Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Apr 4;18(4):e0283668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283668

Integration of targeted sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping into clinically assisted decision support for β-thalassemia invasive prenatal diagnosis

Wenguang Jia 1,2,3,4,#, Jiying Shi 1,#, Hengying Zhu 1,2,3,4, Xiaojing Wu 1, Yayun Ling 1, Ping Chen 1,2,3,4,*
Editor: J Francis Borgio5
PMCID: PMC10072416  PMID: 37014894

Abstract

Background

The high prevalence of β-thalassemia indicates the severe medical burden in Guangxi province in China. Millions of thousands of prenatal women with healthy or thalassemia-carrying fetuses received an unnecessary prenatal diagnosis. We designed a prospective single-center proof-of-concept study to evaluate the utility of a noninvasive prenatal screening method in the stratification of beta-thalassemia patients before invasive procedures.

Methods

Next-generation and optimized pseudo-tetraploid genotyping-based methods were utilized in preceding invasive diagnosis stratification to predict the mater-fetus genotype combinations in cell-free DNA, which is from maternal peripheral blood. Populational linkage disequilibrium information with additional neighboring loci to infer the possible fetal genotype. The concordance of the pseudo-tetraploid genotyping with the gold standard invasive molecular diagnosis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of this method.

Results

127 β-thalassemia carrier parents were consecutively recruited. The total genotype concordance rate is 95.71%. The Kappa value was 0.8248 for genotype combinations and 0.9118 for individual alleles.

Conclusion

This study offers a new approach to picking out the health or carrier fetus before invasive procedures. It provides valuable novel insight into patient stratification management on β-thalassemia prenatal diagnosis.

Introduction

Beta thalassemia (β-thalassemia) is amongst the commonest single-gene disorders worldwide, with the highest prevalence in the Mediterranean region, southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East [1–3]. Over 80 million people (1.5%) worldwide may be carriers of β-thalassemia, and it is estimated that 60,000 affected infants are born yearly [4, 5]. At the same time, only limited prenatal diagnosis choice has been offered for clinical application [3]. In China, thalassemia is mainly prevalent in southern China, south of the Yangtze River. The population carrying frequency (combined α-/β-/α+β- thalassemia) 31.92% [6], 24.19% [7], 23.12% [8], 19.48% [9], 6.8% [10], and 2.63% [11] in the top six provinces Yunnan, Guangxi, Hainan, Guangdong, Fujian, and Sichuan, respectively. A recent meta-analysis suggests that the overall prevalence of α-thalassemia, β-thalassemia, and α+β-thalassemia was 7.88%, 2.21%, and 0.48% [12], respectively, in China, and the high prevalence emerged as a significant impact on public health, society, and economy.

Mutations, including single-nucleotide substitutions or small insertions and deletions within HBB or the immediate flanking sequence, lead to the reduction or complete abolishment of expression of functional HBB chains and cause β-thalassemia [13]. HBB-like globin cluster, located on the short arm of chromosome 11 in a late replicating region, methylated with a relatively low number of genes, which are maintained as closed-chromatin (heterochromatin) in non-erythroid cells [14, 15]. β-thalassemia major causes severe anemia, which becomes apparent 3–6 months after birth, when the switch from fetal globin to adult is almost completed [16, 17].

Currently, there is a lacking of effective treatments for thalassemia. Thalassemia major patients require regular blood transfusions, which cause organ iron overload, particularly in the heart, liver, and other endocrine glands, impairing their function [1, 18]. Detection of carriers and subsequent prenatal screening and diagnosis of fetal thalassemia, as well as early intervention in critically ill patients, are essential and consistent with the focus on congenital disabilities prevention. Thus, prenatal testing of fetuses is the most direct and effective way to control the birth of children with severe thalassemia. In China, Guangxi province has the highest incidence of thalassemia. The incidence of α-, β-, and α+β-thalassemia in Guangxi is 12.51%-15.35%, 5.11%-6.64%, and 1.47%-2.08%, respectively [19, 20], and the newly-born population in 2019 is 660,000 (http://tjj.gxzf.gov.cn//tjsj/tjnj/material/tjnj20200415/2020/zk/indexch.htm). Considering the α-/β-thalassemia combined actual incidence, more than 100,000 pregnant women a year require prenatal diagnosis of fetal thalassemia in this province alone, which takes up a lot of medical resources and places a heavy burden on the local medical system.

Despite the high prevalence and importance of prenatal screening for β-thalassemia, there remains a particular paucity of optional approaches for clinical application. The routine clinical diagnosis of thalassemia is to use invasive prenatal diagnostic techniques such as amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, or umbilical cord puncture to obtain fetal cells and perform thalassemia gene detection. It inevitably carries a risk of infection and a fetal loss rate of approximately 1% [21–24]. However, even in cases where both parents are carriers of the same recessive monogenic disorder, the probability that the child is homozygous is only one in four, meaning that 75 percent of diagnoses result in a healthy child or a carrier who does not require further treatment. In practice, the precious fetus for infertile couples reduces their courage to bear the risk of an interventional prenatal diagnosis. Therefore, prenatal diagnosis of thalassemia in high-incidence areas is in a dilemma. Families and fetuses are at high risk of disease without the invasive prenatal diagnosis. In contrast, timely diagnosis requires tremendous medical resources and facing patient communication pressure for safety and excessive diagnosis. More recently, Noninvasive prenatal testing of common chromosome abnormality has rapidly been incorporated into routine clinical practice over the past decade, showing the potential to revolutionize the management of pregnancies at risk of genetic disorders [25]. Previous studies have also demonstrated the potential of a combined target region capture sequencing approach and pseudo-tetraploid genotype analysis for single-gene prenatal detection [26, 27].

Given this, this study aims to develop an invasive prenatal diagnosis decision-making aid method for parents that are β-thalassemia carriers. In this way, most of the healthy or carrier fetuses can be screened out and excluded from additional invasive surgery, ensuring the homozygous patients have access to the invasive medical diagnostic valuable resource. We intend to optimize existing bioinformatics algorithms to improve sensitivity and specificity further to effectively provide an attainable clinical technique for assessing the need for prenatal diagnosis of β-thalassemia and reducing unnecessary medical diagnoses.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

The ethics committee approved the research from The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China (No. 2019-KY-NFSC-238). Written informed consent for enrollment or consent to continue and to use patient data was obtained from either the patient or the patient’s closest relatives. All procedures in studies involving human participants were performed in compliance with the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. Authors had access to get information on patients that could identify individual participants during or after data collection.

Sample collection and sequencing

As a prospective single-center proof-of-concept study, we consecutively recruited singleton pregnant women preparing for amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, or cordocentesis from April 1 to December 31, 2020, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University in Guangxi Province, which the highest prevalence of β-thalassemia in China. All included patients had a diagnostic confirmation of at least one of the biological parents of the fetus for β-thalassemia carriers included the following types: HBB: CD 41/42(-TCTT), HBB: CD 17(A>T), HBB: IVS-II-654(C>T), HBB: 26(G>A, Hb E), CD 71/72(+A), HBB: -28(A>G), HBB: -29(A>G), HBB: CD 43(G>T), HBB: IVS-I-1(G>T), HBB: CD27/28M (+C), HBB: CD130M (T>A). Patients with vanished twins, malignancy, autoimmune disease, or other factors that are not appropriate for noninvasive prenatal testing were excluded. There is no direct blood relation and collateral blood relation between up to three generations of the couple.

There is 5 ml of maternal peripheral blood samples collected in Streck tubes onsite from consenting participants. The centrifuging, and the preparation of maternal DNA, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolation, library construction, barcoding, sequencing, and data analysis were performed according to previously published methods [26, 27]. Furthermore, 7-bp unique molecular identifier (UMI) was used to determine the real, original, single-allelic molecules [28]. For each maternal plasma sample, an average of 7.7 million reads with 40 bp in length and Q30 > 95% was generated for further analysis.

All fetal genotypes were subjected to standard invasive prenatal diagnosis according to standard protocols for molecular diagnostic testing [29, 30] at the Guangxi Key Thalassemia Research Laboratory. Chorionic villus or amniotic fluid samples of the fetuses were collected by ultrasound-guided transabdominal chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, and then DNA was extracted for PCR. Following that, reverse dot blot hybridization was performed, with 24 oligonucleotide probes arranged on the hybridization membrane to detect seven common and ten rare sites of β-thalassemia mutations in the Chinese population.

Design principle

Compared to the previous attempt to directly target mutational hotspots [26, 27], in this work, we explore the direction of using populational linkage disequilibrium information with additional neighboring loci to infer the possible fetal genotype of pathogenic locus from targeted sequencing of maternal plasma. For those listed known hotspots of β-thalassemia, we evaluate linkage information from common polymorphic loci from the 1000 Genome project, focusing on EAS individuals. We employ the following search scheme:

  1. For each known polymorphic loci as the center, flanking regions of 50 bp on each side were considered candidate target probe regions, and their GC content, uniqueness, and palindromic status were evaluated according to the previous study [28].

  2. For each hotspot, the closest 30 loci upstream and downstream are covered by the continuous span of the LD block constructed from the 1000 Genome data.

Analytical pipeline

gDNA samples from the collection were processed using the same targeting protocol. Sequencing data were aligned to the targeted regions of the human reference genome (hg19). Genomic variants were called using GATK [29]. Haplotyping for each gDNA sample library was processed using Shape it [30]. Pathogenic haplotypes of the known parental carrier were selected and annotated as H1, while the normal haplotypes were grouped as H0.

cfDNA data were pre-processed similarly as previously described [26, 27], with maternal-fetal genotype combinations estimated using pseudo-tetraploid genotyping (PTG). As a follow-up step, fetal genotypes of flanking loci for each hotspot were evaluated against the two haplotype sets formed using the known gDNA data. The fetal cell-free DNA concentration should exceed the detection range (4%) by evaluating the difference between fetal and maternal loci [26]. A likelihood function is defined as the following, and the stepwise accumulated likelihood of both H1 and H0 could be visualized gradually as a function of checked loci within the haplotype.

LLKs,i=∏Hi{1,…,s}P(Gis|His)

Fixme, Select the top-scoring haplotype pair for the test sample and check if it matches.

Fixme, needs to combine the two results somehow, one from PTG, and one from the haplotyping LLK.

Statistical analysis

All data from this study were inputted into SPSS statistics 22 software (IBM, USA) for statistical analysis.

Clinical data such as pregnancy age, gestation week, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and other measurements were processed based on numerical distribution. The ones corresponding to a normal distribution were described statistically with a standard deviation of the mean. For data with skewed distribution, the median was used for statistical description.

The concordance of the pseudo-tetraploid genotyping with the gold standard invasive molecular diagnosis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of this method. The sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa values for genotype combinations and individual alleles were calculated, respectively.

Results

A total of 127 singleton pregnant women from Guangxi provinces in China were prospectively recruited, and these patients all completed the trial and were included in the statistics. Clinical data are shown in Table 1. The β-thalassemia carrier status of fetal parents is presented in Table 2. HBB: CD 41/42 (-TCTT) and HBB: CD 17 (A>T) are the mainstream types of β-thalassemia carriers in this continuous sampling study in Guangxi province, accounting for 43.80% (106 in 242) and 32.64% (79 in 242) respectively. Eighty-nine pregnant women in the study had amniocentesis, 37 had chorionic villus sampling, and only one had cordocentesis. Gold standard invasive molecular diagnosis of 127 fetuses revealed seven mutant homozygous and 19 composite heterozygous fetuses with severe thalassemia in both cases. The remaining fetuses were 64 carriers and 37 healthy fetuses.

Table 1. Clinical information of enrolled subjects (pregnant women, n = 127).

Mean±standard deviation minimum Maximum
Age (years) 28.47±6.05 16 47
Height (cm) 156.44±5.02 145 171
Body weight (kg) 54.78±7.84 40.5 79.0
Gestational age (weeks) 15.24±3.31 12.0 26.0
BMI(m 2 /kg) 20.3±3.2 18.4 23.98
Fetuses with thalassemia major Fetuses with thalassemia minor Healthy fetuses
Reproductive history 2 21 104
Family history 3 43 81

cm, centimeter; kg, kilogram; BMI, body mass index

Table 2. The β-thalassemia carrier status of fetal biological parents.

Mutant type HGVS name Carrier
Mother Father
CD 41/42 (-TCTT) HBB:c.126_129delCTTT 56 50
CD 17 (A>T) HBB:c.52A>T 41 38
-28 (A>G) HBB:c.-78A>G 9 7
IVS-II-654 (C>T) HBB:c.316-197C>T 8 6
26 (G>A, Hb E) HBB:c.79G>A 3 7
CD 71/72 (+A) HBB:c.216_217insA 2 4
IVS-I-1 (G>T) HBB:c.92+1G>T 4 1
CD 43 (G>T) HBB:c.130G>T 1 2
CD27/28M (+C) HBB:c.84_85insC 1 0
-29 (A>G) HBB:c.-79A>G 0 1
CD130M (T>A) HBB:c.393T>A 1 0
Total 126 116

*HGVS: Human Genome Variation Society

Compared with the original genotyping approach [26, 27], our new populational linkage disequilibrium information enhanced pseudo-tetraploid genotyping method increases the mutation ratio bias elimination, which is fundamental in genotype calling. The skew allelic ratios are mainly caused by the noise from the homologous sequences with the target sequences and also can be generated by random sequencing errors, non-uniformity of coverage, or unbalanced PCR amplification efficiency between maternal and fetal cfDNA. In genotyping methods where pseudo-tetraploid analysis is performed only at the target allele locus, the noise and random error cannot be rechecked and eliminated. On the contrary, adding upstream and downstream linkage sites for joint inference of the possible mother-fetal joint genotype of cfDNA compound in maternal peripheral blood makes the allele ratio closer to the true value. Thus, the predicted genotype would be closer to the true genotype and could be more easily distinguished from other false genotypes (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Diagram of pseudo-tetraploid genotype prediction using the original and optimized methods in sample DY07001.

Fig 1

The pathogenic haplotypes of the known parental carrier were annotated as H1, while the normal haplotypes were grouped as H0. The pathogenic haplotypes of the offspring were marked as M1 and the healthy haplotype as M0. (A) The most likely combination of maternal-fetal genotypes (orange and black) predicted using the original method among the eight genotypes of a pair of alleles. (B) The most likely combination of maternal-fetal genotypes (orange and black) was predicted with the optimized method. The accurate combination of maternal-fetal genotypes could be more clearly distinguished from other interfering genotypes after modification.

The cfDNA in maternal peripheral blood is a mixture of the mother and fetus so it can be regarded as a pseudo-tetraploid genotype. This study detected 11 common β-thalassemia mutation sites in each of 127 enrolled pregnant women, resulting in 1397 genotype combinations. Suppose we define the wild-type and mutant alleles of the mother as the letters ‘A’ and ‘B’ and the wild-type and mutant alleles of the fetus as ‘a’ and ‘b’. In that case, there are five pseudo-tetraploid genotype combinations in the maternal cfDNA when the couple is a β-thalassemia carrier. Thus, there are 1337 concordant cases among 1397 detected phenotypes with a total genotype concordance rate of 95.71% (Table 3). Furthermore, homozygous and complex heterozygous mutated alleles need to be diagnosed for the fetus. In contrast, wild-type alleles and carriers are theoretically not life-threatening and may be protected from further treatment. Thus, we compared the concordance of our predictions with gold standard data on the necessity of invasive prenatal diagnosis in 1397 genotype combinations, and the Kappa value was 0.8248 (Table 4). To be more precise, each gene locus has two alleles. The detection effectiveness of this method for individual alleles is shown in Table 5, and the final sensitivity was 82.88%, the specificity was 98.84%, and the Kappa value was 0.9118.

Table 3. Maternal-fetal genotype combinations concordance of the pseudo-tetraploid genotyping (PTG) with the gold standard invasive molecular diagnosis (IMD).

IMD genotype
AAaa AAab ABaa ABab ABbb
PTG genotype AAaa 1232 6 5 3
AAab 1 31 1
ABaa 1 44 11
ABab 11 27 1
ABbb 1 19 3
Total (1397) 1233 38 61 61 4

Table 4. The concordance of pseudo-tetraploid genotyping (PTG) with the invasive molecular diagnosis (IMD) (the current gold standard) on the necessity of invasive prenatal diagnosis.

IMD
PTG Diagnosis inevitable Relatively safe
Diagnosis inevitable 36 18
Relatively safe 6 1337
Sensitivity 85.71%
Specificity 98.67%
PPV 66.67%
NPV 99.55%
Kappa 0.8248

Homozygous and complex heterozygous mutated alleles need to be diagnosed, while wild-type alleles and carriers are theoretically not life-threatening and may be protected from further treatment.

Table 5. The concordance of pseudo-tetraploid genotyping (PTG) with the invasive molecular diagnosis (IMD) (the current gold standard) on the β-thalassemia individual allele.

Mutation ID PTG IMD Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV P0 Pe Kappa
b a
HBB:c.126_129delCTTT b 41 20 93.18% 90.48% 67.21% 98.45% 0.9094 0.6748 0.7215
a 3 190
HBB:c.52A>T b 31 7 73.81% 96.70% 81.58% 94.91% 0.9291 0.7401 0.7273
a 11 205
HBB:c.-78A>G b 4 2 66.67% 99.19% 66.67% 99.19% 0.9843 0.9614 0.5916
a 2 246
HBB:c.316-197C>T b 4 1 80.00% 99.60% 80.00% 99.60% 0.9921 0.9690 0.7457
a 1 248
HBB:c.79G>A b 4 1 100.00% 99.60% 80.00% 100.00% 0.9961 0.9728 0.8550
a 0 249
HBB:c.216_217insA b 4 0 100% 100% 100.00% 100.00% 1.0000 0.9767 1.0000
a 0 250
HBB:c.92+1G>T b 1 0 33.33% 100.00% 100.00% 99.21% 0.9921 0.9922 -0.0039
a 2 251
HBB:c.130G>T b 1 0 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
a 0 253
HBB:c.84_85insC b 1 0 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
a 0 253
HBB:c.-79A>G b 1 0 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
a 0 253
HBB:c.393T>A b 0 0 NA 1 NA 1.0000 1.0000 1.0079 1.0000
a 0 254
All b 92 31 82.88% 98.84% 74.80% 99.29% 10.8030 112.1700 0.9118
a 19 2398

The letter a denote fetal wild-type alleles and b represents mutated alleles.

* NA: not available.

In addition, in the current clinical treatment pathway, 118 cases with both parents being carriers in 127 patients require an invasive diagnosis. However, the invasive molecular diagnosis result shows only five fetuses that are pathology homozygous, 17 are complex heterozygous, and 96 people, including 34 healthy individuals and 62 β-thalassemia carriers, underwent unnecessary invasive diagnoses. On the contrary, our method allows for a tremendous reduction of the invasive demand, and only 30 people (4 homozygous patients, 12 compound heterozygotes, and 14 prediction errors) need an additional diagnosis. However, we still missed one pathogenic homozygous and five complex heterozygous children who required invasive procedures.

Discussion

In China, prenatal management of the thalassemia burden remains a challenging issue due to the sheer size of the population and the high carrier rates in individual provinces. With limited options, prenatal diagnosis of thalassemia relies primarily on invasive procedures associated with risks for both the fetus and the mother. Here, we optimized the existing method based on targeted sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping and established the first invasive diagnosis stratification and fetus β-thalassemia risk prediction model.

Severe β-thalassemia requires a lifelong dependence on blood transfusions and iron removal, which are expensive and have an extremely high mortality rate, placing a huge burden on patients, families, and society [17]. β-thalassemia is a serious public health problem in endemic regions. Carrier screening and genetic counseling for populations in endemic areas, prenatal fetal genetic testing in high-risk couples, and pregnancy intervention to avoid the birth of children with severe β-thalassemia are the only effective measures for preventing and controlling thalassemia [1]. Publicity and education are essential for high-risk screening couples. Two of the 127 couples who participated in this study had previously had anemic children, and more than a quarter of the subjects did not consider themselves anemic before this screening. This status underscores the importance of scientific advocacy for prenatal diagnosis in regions where thalassemia is endemic.

The complexity of the spectrum of the β-thalassemia gene mutation complicates β-thalassemia screening and prenatal diagnosis in high-risk couples. More than 200 types of β-thalassemia gene mutations have been found at home and abroad, covering the promoter region, exon region, cut region, and 3’ untranslated region of the HBB gene. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that there are significant geographical and ethnic differences in the types of gene mutations [7, 31, 32]. For example, HBB:c.79G>A carries 50% in India in South Asia, whereas it carries 0.1% in Pakistan [33]. A total of 46 β-thalassemia mutations have been reported in the Chinese populations. Eight types, including HBB:c.126_129delCTTT, HBB: c.316-197C>T, HBB: c.216_217insA, HBB: c.52A>T, HBB: c.-78A>G, HBB: c.79G>A, HBB: c.-79A>G, HBB: c.130G>T accounted for more than 95% of the total number of β-thalassemia [7, 31, 34]. On this basis, our group designed a probe capture panel with 12 gene mutation types, including the eight mutations mentioned above, to meet the epidemiological and clinical needs. This study is also the study with the largest number of mutation types in noninvasive prenatal exploration.

Obtaining detectable fetal DNA is the key to the success or failure of prenatal diagnosis. Invasive prenatal diagnosis can be performed by chorionic villus sampling in the first trimester and amniocentesis or cordocentesis in the second trimester [35, 36]. These puncture techniques have become the standard methods for obtaining fetal tissue, which can often extract sufficient fetal DNA to meet the needs of conventional thalassemia genetic detection methods, such as multiplex PCR, nested PCR, and digital PCR. They do not require complex bioinformatics analysis to make accurate judgments. However, these procedures lead to unavoidable risks, such as 2% to 3% fetal loss and 1% placental abruption [23, 37, 38], prompting and driving the continuous exploration of noninvasive prenatal testing for thalassemia.

Cell-free fetal DNA in maternal peripheral blood is an ideal method for noninvasive prenatal detection of genetic material in thalassemia fetuses. In 1997, Lo YM et al. first found the presence of cfDNA in maternal peripheral plasma [39], and they described the biological characteristics of cfDNA, such as concentration, origin, fragment length, and half-life, in a subsequent study [40]. In 2010, it was found that cfDNA contains all the information of the fetal genome [41]. Since then, multiple teams have explored using fetal genetic material in cfDNA for noninvasive prenatal testing for β-thalassemia. These studies can be divided into two broad categories from the perspective of DNA amplification techniques: quantitative PCR and high-throughput sequencing. The sensitivity and specificity of droplet digital PCR combined with relative variation dosage method for prenatal detection of HBB: c.93-21G>A (IVSI-110 G>A) mutation [42] were 100% and 97.07%, respectively. A total of 36 fetuses with homozygous mutations were detected by real-time PCR allele-specific amplification refractory mutation system, and its specificity is consistent with invasive testing [43]. These studies have the shortcomings of a few gene mutations and few experimental samples, which limit their promotion and application.

Maternal cell-free DNA background in maternal peripheral blood is an important factor affecting noninvasive prenatal testing, especially when both husband and wife carry the same β-thalassemia gene mutation [44]. Therefore, the analysis and processing methods of sequencing products after PCR sequencing are the key to its application in noninvasive prenatal testing. Researchers have designed a variety of bioinformatics analysis research protocols to attempt to solve the above problems. Among them, the more commonly used algorithm models are relative haplotype dosage (RHDO) [45, 46] and relative mutation dosage (RMD) [4, 47, 48]. Although some strategies have reached 99.19% sensitivity and 99.92% specificity [4], the current RHDO and RMD strategies still cannot meet the requirements of clinical prenatal testing applications. The main reasons that affect the sensitivity and specificity of the RHDO strategy are the identification of a large amount of parental genetic information and the processing method of the following information when constructing linkage disequilibrium. The main factors affecting the application of RMD are the number of loci in a panel, the number of samples that can be detected in one experiment, and the accurate quantification of wild-type and mutant copy numbers of loci, which are difficult to achieve clinically usable levels at the same time. In contrast, our new method only uses maternal blood to obtain the predictive value of fetal genotypes without recruiting parents and adding additional parental experiments like the RHDO method. In addition, the application of high-throughput sequencing makes it possible to detect multiple sites in multiple patients simultaneously, which will help reduce the cost of clinical use.

This study optimized the existing methods based on targeted sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping and, for the first time, established a predictive model for invasive diagnostic stratification and fetal β-thalassemia risk prediction. The new haplotype-based inference method is improved compared to the previous method. The Kappa value of the single allele was 0.9118, and the Kappa value of the genotype combination was 0.8248, which could be used as a choice for screening healthy or carrier fetuses before invasive diagnosis. Therefore, the results of this pilot study will be used to prevent unnecessary treatment of 82 low-risk patients. However, stratification of some patients for β-thalassemia according to existing methods is ineffective. One pathogenic homozygote and five compound heterozygotes requiring invasive diagnosis were missed, and 14 prediction errors resulted in additional amniocentesis diagnoses. As reported in previous studies, the detection rate and accuracy of the seven genotypes of cfDNA in maternal peripheral blood are variable [25]. Since this method assumes a strong 1:1 equilibrium of allele coverage at heterozygous loci, the significant deviation from the minor allele frequency of 0.5 is contributed by the homozygous genotype at the same locus from the fetus [25]. It means that if the mother is a heterozygous carrier, it is difficult to differentiate the carrier fetus (ABAB) from the affected fetus (ABBB). Such unexpected deviation from equilibrium is relatively common in next-generation sequencing and is responsible for most fetal genotype prediction errors in this study. In addition, the new method still suffers from the fetal genotyping error from allele imbalance, UMI, and a more linear amplification method to the rescue, which is the goal to strive for in the future. In addition, the limited number of patients may restrict the validity of the background population database, and a larger population background is still needed. The direct haplotyping methods used to improve background quality are as important as improving accuracy. Moreover, China is a multi-ethnic country, and the number of ethnic groups in Guangxi is particularly rich, and the type of β-thalassemia is diverse. Since the above factors may lead to changes in linkage disequilibrium information in the population, our results must be confirmed in other populations, and other β-thalassemia types before large-scale clinical trials as the populational linkage disequilibrium information may change due to those factors mentioned above.

In conclusion, the present study provides valuable new insights into patient stratification before invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis of β-thalassemia. The predictive ability of cfDNA and noninvasive technologies based on next-generation sequencing will bring better solutions to medical challenges. However, prenatal diagnosis is the only effective way to avoid the birth of the affected fetus. If both parents are present, direct testing of the parents using genomic DNA to predict the risk of a pregnancy giving birth to a child with β-thalassemia would be a more effective, cost-effective, and specific approach. Our strategy is intended only as a reference for clinicians and not as a replacement for invasive testing. Our implementation aims to explore and refine this strategy with a view to its application in clinical practice soon. After all, safe and effective noninvasive prenatal diagnostic techniques have always been the direction and goal of prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases such as thalassemia.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients for participating in this study. We also thank Annoroad Gene Technology Co., Ltd for its technical support and advice in bioinformatics analysis.

Data Availability

Genetic data on thalassemia is prohibited from being transmitted to the public database temporarily by Chinese Law, but it can be disclosed in a restricted way. If necessary, please contact to Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Tel: +867715356557, Fax: +867715359801, Address: No.6, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, Guangxi province, 530021, China. We also provide a point of contact through e-mail which can contact the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, and request access to our data: gxydkyb@163.com.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by National Nature Science Foundation of China (81960574, 82060578) and the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019PT310012).

References

  • 1.Williams TN, Weatherall DJ. World distribution, population genetics, and health burden of the hemoglobinopathies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012. Sep 1;2(9):a011692. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011692 ; PMCID: PMC3426822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Higgs DR, Engel JD, Stamatoyannopoulos G. Thalassaemia. Lancet 2012. Jan 28;379(9813):373–383. Epub 2011 Sep 9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60283-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Modell B, Darlison M. Global epidemiology of haemoglobin disorders and derived service indicators. Bull World Health Organ. 2008. Jun;86(6):480–487. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.036673 ; PMCID: PMC2647473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang X, Zhou Q, Zhou W, Zhong M, Guo X, Wang X, et al. A cell-free DNA barcode-enabled single-molecule test for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders: application to β-thalassemia. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019. Apr 1;6(11):1802332. doi: 10.1002/advs.201802332 ; PMCID: PMC6548944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zheng CG, Liu M, Du J, Chen K, Yang Y, Yang Z. Molecular spectrum of α- and β-globin gene mutations detected in the population of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China. Hemoglobin. 2011;35(1):28–39. doi: 10.3109/03630269.2010.547429 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang TL, Zhang TY, Song CY, Lin YB, Sang BH, Lei QL, et al. Gene mutation spectrum of thalassemia among children in Yunnan province. Front Pediatr. 2020. Apr 15;8:159. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00159 ; PMCID: PMC7174584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wei B, Zhou W, Peng M, Long J, Wen W. The population incidence of thalassemia gene variants in Baise, Guangxi, P. R. China, based on random samples. Hematology. 2022. Sep;27(1):1026–1031. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2119736 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang Z, Sun W, Chen H, Zhang Y, Wang F, Chen H, et al. Prevalence and molecular spectrum of α- and β-globin gene mutations in Hainan, China. Int J Hematol. 2021. Sep;114(3):307–318. Epub 2021 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03173-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xu XM, Zhou YQ, Luo GX, Liao C, Zhou M, Chen PY, et al. The prevalence and spectrum of alpha and beta thalassaemia in Guangdong Province: implications for the future health burden and population screening. J Clin Pathol. 2004. May;57(5):517–522. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2003.014456 ; PMCID: PMC1770296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang H, Xu L, Chen M, Lin N, Xue H, Chen L, et al. Molecular characterization of thalassemia and hemoglobinopathy in Southeastern China. Sci Rep. 2019. Mar 5;9(1):3493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40089-5 ; PMCID: PMC6400947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li B, Han X, Ma J, Yang D. Mutation spectrum and erythrocyte indices characterisation of α-thalassaemia and β-thalassaemia in Sichuan women in China: a thalassaemia screening survey of 42 155 women. J Clin Pathol. 2021. Mar;74(3):182–186. Epub 2020 Jul 27. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206588 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lai K, Huang G, Su L, He Y. The prevalence of thalassemia in mainland China: evidence from epidemiological surveys. Sci Rep. 2017. Apr 19;7(1):920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00967-2 ; PMCID: PMC5430438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thein SL. The molecular basis of β-thalassemia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013. May 1;3(5):a011700. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011700 ; PMCID: PMC3633182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Higgs DR, Garrick D, Anguita E, De Gobbi M, Hughes J, Muers M, et al. Understanding alpha-globin gene regulation: Aiming to improve the management of thalassemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1054:92–102. doi: 10.1196/annals.1345.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mettananda S, Gibbons RJ, Higgs DR. α-Globin as a molecular target in the treatment of β-thalassemia. Blood. 2015. Jun 11;125(24):3694–3701. Epub 2015 Apr 13. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-633594 ; PMCID: PMC4497969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sankaran VG, Orkin SH. The switch from fetal to adult hemoglobin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013. Jan 1;3(1):a011643. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011643 ; PMCID: PMC3530042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Galanello R, Origa R. Beta-thalassemia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010. May 21;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-11 ; PMCID: PMC2893117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.He S, Qin Q, Yi S, Wei Y, Lin L, Chen S, et al. Prevalence and genetic analysis of α- and β-thalassemia in Baise region, a multi-ethnic region in southern China. Gene. 2017. Jul 1;619:71–75. Epub 2016 Feb 10. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.02.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He S, Li J, Li DM, Yi S, Lu X, Luo Y, et al. Molecular characterization of α- and β-thalassemia in the Yulin region of Southern China. Gene. 2018. May 20;655:61–64. Epub 2018 Feb 23. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.02.058 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tabor A, Philip J, Madsen M, Bang J, Obel EB, Nørgaard-Pedersen B. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet. 1986. Jun 7;1(8493):1287–1293. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91218-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sundberg K, Bang J, Smidt-Jensen S, Brocks V, Lundsteen C, Parner J, et al. Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling. Lancet. 1997. Sep 6;350(9079):697–703. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02449-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Odibo AO, Gray DL, Dicke JM, Stamilio DM, Macones GA, Crane JP. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center’s 16-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. Mar;111(3):589–595. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162eb53 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, D’Antonio F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015. Jan;45(1):16–26. doi: 10.1002/uog.14636 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Allen S, Young E, Gerrish A. Chapter 9—noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders. In: Lieve PC, Klein HG, editors. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Academic Press; 2018. p. 157–177. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814189-2.00009-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yin X, Du Y, Zhang H, Wang Z, Wang J, Fu X, et al. Identification of a de novo fetal variant in osteogenesis imperfecta by targeted sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing. J Hum Genet. 2018. Nov;63(11):1129–1137. Epub 2018 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s10038-018-0489-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luo Y, Jia B, Yan K, Liu S, Song X, Chen M, et al. Pilot study of a novel multi-functional noninvasive prenatal test on fetus aneuploidy, copy number variation, and single-gene disorder screening. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019. Apr;7(4):e00597. Epub 2019 Feb 14. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.597 ; PMCID: PMC6465655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang J, Li J, Saucier JB, Feng Y, Jiang Y, Sinson J, et al. Non-invasive prenatal sequencing for multiple Mendelian monogenic disorders using circulating cell-free fetal DNA. Nat Med. 2019. Mar;25(3):439–447. Epub 2019 Jan 28. Erratum in: Nat Med. 2019 Feb 20. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0334-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Du Y, Murani E, Ponsuksili S, Wimmers K. Flexible and efficient genome tiling design with penalized uniqueness score. BMC bioinformatics. 2012. Dec 5;13:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-323 ; PMCID: PMC3583072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011. May;43(5):491–498. Epub 2011 Apr 10. doi: 10.1038/ng.806 ; PMCID: PMC3083463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.O’Connell J, Gurdasani D, Delaneau O, Pirastu N, Ulivi S, Cocca M, et al. A general approach for haplotype phasing across the full spectrum of relatedness. PLoS Genet. 2014. Apr 17;10(4):e1004234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004234 ; PMCID: PMC3990520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xian J, Wang Y, He J, Li S, He W, Ma X, et al. Molecular epidemiology and hematologic characterization of thalassemia in guangdong province, southern China. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022. Jan-Dec;28:10760296221119807. doi: 10.1177/10760296221119807 ; PMCID: PMC9393661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Karnpean R, Tepakhan W, Suankul P, Thingphom S, Poonsawat A, Thanunchaikunlanun N, et al. Genetic background studies of eight common beta thalassemia mutations in Thailand using β-globin gene haplotype and phylogenetic analysis. Genes (Basel). 2022. Aug 3;13(8):1384. doi: 10.3390/genes13081384 ; PMCID: PMC9407504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Colah R, Gorakshakar A, Nadkarni A. Global burden, distribution and prevention of β-thalassemias and hemoglobin E disorders. Expert Rev Hematol. 2010. Feb;3(1):103–117. doi: 10.1586/ehm.09.74 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang H, Chen M, Chen L, Zhang M, Wang Y, Lin N, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of thalassemia in 695 pedigrees from southeastern China: a 10-year follow-up study. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021. Oct;35(10):e23982. Epub 2021 Sep 4. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23982 ; PMCID: PMC8529144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li DZ, Yang YD. Invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal thalassemia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017. Feb;39:41–52. Epub 2016 Oct 26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.10.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu H, Wang H, Lan L, Zeng M, Guo W, Zheng Z, et al. Invasive molecular prenatal diagnosis of alpha and beta thalassemia among Hakka pregnant women. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. Dec;97(52):e13557. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013557 ; PMCID: PMC6314693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wax JR, Davies NP, Watson WJ, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Chard R, et al. Pain associated with chorionic villus sampling: transabdominal vs transcervical approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. Oct;201(4):400.e1-3. Epub 2009 Aug 15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.064 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stergiotou I, Borobio V, Bennasar M, Goncé A, Mula R, Nuruddin M, et al. Transcervical chorionic villus sampling: a practical guide. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1244–1251. Epub 2015 Jun 11. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1043261 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997. Aug 16;350(9076):485–487. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02174-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lo YM, Zhang J, Leung TN, Lau TK, Chang AM, Hjelm NM. Rapid clearance of fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet. 1999. Jan;64(1):218–24. doi: 10.1086/302205 ; PMCID: PMC1377720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lo YM, Chan KC, Sun H, Chen EZ, Jiang P, Lun FM, et al. Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Sci Transl Med. 2010. Dec 8;2(61):61ra91. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001720 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Constantinou CG, Karitzi E, Byrou S, Stephanou C, Michailidou K, Makariou C, et al. Optimized droplet digital PCR assay on cell-free DNA samples for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: application to beta-thalassemia. Clin Chem. 2022. Jul 27;68(8):1053–1063. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac076 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sawakwongpra K, Tangmansakulchai K, Ngonsawan W, Promwan S, Chanchamroen S, Quangkananurug W, et al. Droplet-based digital PCR for non-invasive prenatal genetic diagnosis of α and β-thalassemia. Biomed Rep. 2021. Oct;15(4):82. Epub 2021 Aug 9. doi: 10.3892/br.2021.1458 ; PMCID: PMC8411484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hudecova I, Chiu RW. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of thalassemias using maternal plasma cell free DNA. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017. Feb;39:63–73. Epub 2016 Oct 26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.10.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lam KW, Jiang P, Liao GJ, Chan KC, Leung TY, Chiu RW, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases by targeted massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma: application to β-thalassemia. Clin Chem. 2012. Oct;58(10):1467–1475. Epub 2012 Aug 15. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.189589 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Saba L, Masala M, Capponi V, Marceddu G, Massidda M, Rosatelli MC. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassemia by semiconductor sequencing: a feasibility study in the sardinian population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017. May;25(5):600–607. Epub 2017 Mar 8. PMCID: PMC5437905. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xiong L, Barrett AN, Hua R, Ho S, Jun L, Chan K, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal inheritance of maternal β-thalassaemia mutations using targeted sequencing and relative mutation dosage: a feasibility study. BJOG. 2018. Mar;125(4):461–468. Epub 2018 Jan 9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15045 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Papasavva T, van Ijcken WF, Kockx CE, van den Hout MC, Kountouris P, Kythreotis L, et al. Next generation sequencing of SNPs for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: challenges and feasibility as illustrated by an application to β-thalassaemia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013. Dec;21(12):1403–10. Epub 2013 Apr 10. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.47 ; PMCID: PMC3831067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

J Francis Borgio

8 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-16457Integration of targeted sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping into clinical assisted decision support for β-thalassemia invasive prenatal diagnosisPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chen,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 23 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

J Francis Borgio, Ph.D.,

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This study was funded by the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019PT310012) and National Nature Science Foundation of China (81960574, 82060578).”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.""

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Review Comments to the Author:

The authors tried to investigate the utilization of non-invasive approach to select the healthy or carrier fetus before invasive procedures by using an alternative method, pseudo-tetraploid genotyping in concordance with gold standard invasive method and provided a valuable novel insight into patient stratification management on β-thalassemia prenatal diagnosis. Although much is known about the noninvasive approaches from various publications, they tried to add novel information to the literature by performing this study in chines’ population. The study design, materials and methods and the statics used are appropriate however there are some comments to be addressed, which are noted below.

Major comments:

1. First, much is known about this subject and there are numerous publications discussing this issue. In this paper, it is not very clear in which ways they contributed "novel" to the literature in correlation with other noninvasive approaches using maternal cell free DNA. This must be emphasized clearly and discussed accordingly.

2. The authors should clarify what are the fetal markers used to confirm the presence of fetal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma/blood.

3. Clinical data of the patients and the diversity of the mutations is limited. I suggest broadening the clinical data of the patients and discuss other types of mutations such as deletions, insertions and how these mutations could be applied to this technique. Additionally, it would be useful to discuss the concordant and discordant results.

4. Are the results confirmed by another testing method?

5. The "Discussion" is rather short. It would be better to expand it regarding the clinical data of the patients together with beta thalassemia mutation spectrum in different populations, the molecular techniques used in invasive and non-invasive testing with the up-to-date literature.

6. “Discussion” section is lack of references, it very important to discuss the results of current study in agreement or disagreement with other studies.

Minor comments:

1. There are some grammatical errors, and it should be revised throughout the manuscript where appropriate.

2. It is better to mention the objectives of the study and type of study in the abstract section.

3. It would be better to add more recent and up to date publication and delete old ones unless they are crucial.

4. Mention the name and version of software used for statistical purposes.

5. Also please explain the abbreviations used in the figure and give legend of the figure.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript describes a non invasive methodology to be used a tool for the stratification of patients before invasive procedures on β-thalassaemia prenatal diagnosis.

The authors used previously developed and evaluated methodology, the pseudo-tatraploid genotyping coupled with optimized bioinformatics algorithms to improve sensitivity and specificity. Their results were successful in predicting and linking the cfDNA haplotype to the beta allele. They presented here a very promising and intelligent predictive tool for fetal haplotyping using cell free fetal DNA in the high background of maternal DNA.

This predictive tool can be especially beneficial for the pregnancies where the father is not present or the genotype is unknown. However, in cases where the parents are both available, it would be more efficient, less costly and more specific to test directly the parents using genomic DNA, in order to predict the risk of the pregnancy having a beta thalassaemia child. So I recommend that screening the couple before hand could avoid having to apply this tool which is more complicated and more costly.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 4;18(4):e0283668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283668.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


17 Jan 2023

Dear Editor,

Our revised manuscript, "Integration of targeted sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping into clinical assisted decision support for β-thalassemia invasive prenatal diagnosis", has been resubmitted online to PLOS ONE.

We revised the manuscript according to the reviewers' comments. In the revised manuscript, we improved the writing by correcting typos, grammar, and phrase errors. Detailed presentations of patient clinical data, validation methods, and statistical methods are supplemented. Additionally, the discussion section has been comprehensively revised, adding descriptions of the spectrum of β-thalassemia mutations in different populations, molecular techniques used in invasive and noninvasive testing, and the latest literature.

Following the journal requirements, the manuscript has been restructured to meet the journal style requirements accordingly, including but not limited to text conversion of subsection titles, reformatting the tables, and updating the literature citation format, as indicated in the manuscript files. In addition, this study was funded by the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019PT310012) and National Nature Science Foundation of China (81960574, 82060578). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Genetic data on thalassemia is prohibited from being transmitted to the public database temporarily by Chinese Law, but it can be disclosed in a restricted way. If necessary, please contact to Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Tel: +867715356557, Fax: +867715359801, Address: No.6, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, Guangxi province, 530021, China).

Thank you very much for your time handling our manuscript and the valuable suggestions given by the reviewers. We sincerely hope the revised manuscript could meet the merits and will be finally accepted for publication.

To reviewers

These comments are precious and helpful for revising and improving the manuscript. I have read through the comments carefully and revised the manuscript based on these comments. We revised the manuscript with the final "Clean Version", and point-to-point responses are also presented as follows, precisely describing what amendments have been made to the manuscript and where these can be viewed.

Responses to reviewer 1

1) Comment: First, much is known about this subject and there are numerous publications discussing this issue. In this paper, it is not very clear in which ways they contributed “novel“ to the literature in correlation with other noninvasive approaches using maternal cell-free DNA. This must be emphasized clearly and discussed accordingly.

My response: Thank you for your constructive comments. We have added a separate paragraph in the revised discussion section to give a detailed description instead of the previous unclear statement. Compared with the relative haplotype dosage (RHDO) and relative mutation dosage (RMD) algorithmic models, the "integrated target sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping" strategy has the advantage of detecting multiple sites in multiple patients at a single time. In addition, the pseudo-tetraploid algorithm can perform noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of the fetus and construct the fetal genotype without knowing the proband's genotype or obtaining a large amount of parental DNA information. (Page18-19, Line310-329)

2) Comment: The authors should clarify what are the fetal markers used to confirm the presence of fetal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma/blood.

My response: I am sorry for the unclear presentation. We used information on population linkage disequilibrium at additional adjacent loci upstream and downstream of the target locus, the difference between fetal and maternal genetic linkage, to assess fetal concentration and ensure that it was above the lower detection limit. A description of this section was added in the “Design principles“ section in the revised manuscript. ( Page8, Line159-166)

3) Comment: Clinical data of the patients and the diversity of the mutations is limited. I suggest broadening the clinical data of the patients and discuss other types of mutations such as deletions, insertions and how these mutations could be applied to this technique. Additionally, it would be useful to discuss the concordant and discordant results.

My response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The clinical data of the enrolled patients were supplemented in Table 1, including pregnancy age, gestation week, weight, height, body mass index, reproductive history, and family history. Theoretically, this method is also suitable for detecting deletion and insertion mutations, but further large-scale studies are needed to confirm this. A total of 46 β-thalassemia mutations have been reported in the Chinese populations. Eight types, including HBB:c.126_129delCTTT, HBB: c.316-197C>T, HBB: c.216_217insA, HBB: c.52A>T, HBB: c.-78A>G, HBB: c.79G>A, HBB: c.-79A>G, HBB: c.130G>T accounted for more than 95% of the total number of β-thalassemia. On this basis, considering the economic factors and ethnic specificity of mutations, we designed only a test containing 11 common mutations to meet the epidemiological and clinical needs. This part was also supplemented in the discussion. (Page16-17, Line272-285) In addition, the detection rate and accuracy of the seven genotypes of cfDNA in maternal peripheral blood are variable, leading to the consistency and inconsistency of the test results. A more detailed discussion has been added to the revised manuscript. (Page19, Line338-357)

4) Comment: Are the results confirmed by another testing method?

My response: I am sorry for the unclear presentation. All fetal genotypes were subjected to standard invasive prenatal diagnosis according to standard protocols for molecular diagnostic testing [29, 30] at the Guangxi Key Thalassemia Research Laboratory. Chorionic villus or amniotic fluid samples of the fetuses were collected by ultrasound-guided transabdominal chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, and then DNA was extracted for PCR. Following that, reverse dot blot hybridization was performed, with 24 oligonucleotide probes arranged on the hybridization membrane to detect seven common and ten rare sites of β-thalassemia mutations in the Chinese population. (Page7, Line134-140)

5) Comment: The “Discussion“ is rather short. It would be better to expand it regarding the clinical data of the patients together with beta-thalassemia mutation spectrum in different populations, the molecular techniques used in invasive and non-invasive testing with the up-to-date literature.

My response: Thank you very much for your constructive suggestions. The “Discussion“ section has been revised accordingly. (Page15-21, Line255-368)

6) Comment: “Discussion“ section is lack of references, it very important to discuss the results of current study in agreement or disagreement with other studies.

My response: The entire “Discussion“ section has been revised accordingly, adding nearly 1300 words for a detailed description. (Page15-21, Line255-368)

7) Comment: There are some grammatical errors, and it should be revised throughout the manuscript where appropriate.

My response: I have invited an English speaker to polish the manuscript, and “Track Changes“was used to indicate the modified place in the revised “Track Changes Version” manuscript.

8 Comment: It is better to mention the objectives of the study and type of study in the abstract section.

My response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The "Abstract" section has been modified accordingly. (Page2, Line26-29)

9) Comment: It would be better to add more recent and up-to-date publication and delete old ones unless they are crucial.

My response: As suggested by the reviews, we added the more recent and up-to-date publications and removed old ones. (Page22-31, Line392-591)

10) Comment: Mention the name and version of the software used for statistical purposes.

My response: The name and version number of the statistical software have been added to the "Statistical analysis" chapter in the revised article. (Page8, Line172-173)

11) Comment: Also please explain the abbreviations used in the figure and give legend of the figure.

My response: I am sorry for the unclear presentation. The figure title and legend have been rewritten. All abbreviations used in the figure have been explained, and the pictures have been more clearly illustrated. (Page11, Line209-217)

Responses to reviewer 2

1) Comment: The manuscript describes a non-invasive methodology to be used a tool for the stratification of patients before invasive procedures on β-thalassaemia prenatal diagnosis.

The authors used previously developed and evaluated methodology, the pseudo-tatraploid genotyping coupled with optimized bioinformatics algorithms to improve sensitivity and specificity. Their results were successful in predicting and linking the cfDNA haplotype to the beta allele. They presented here a very promising and intelligent predictive tool for fetal haplotyping using cell free fetal DNA in the high background of maternal DNA.

This predictive tool can be especially beneficial for the pregnancies where the father is not present or the genotype is unknown. However, in cases where the parents are both available, it would be more efficient, less costly and more specific to test directly the parents using genomic DNA, in order to predict the risk of the pregnancy having a beta thalassemia child. So I recommend that screening the couple beforehand could avoid having to apply this tool which is more complicated and more costly.

My response: Thank you for the helpful comment. To date, all noninvasive prenatal diagnostic strategies for thalassemia have failed to meet clinical needs compared with traditional invasive diagnostic methods. The main limiting factors are specificity and sensitivity, complex bioinformatics methods, and economic cost. Admittedly, prenatal diagnosis is the only effective way to avoid the birth of the affected fetus. If both parents are present, direct testing of the parents using genomic DNA to predict the risk of a pregnancy giving birth to a child with β-thalassemia would be a more effective, cost-effective, and specific approach. Our strategy is intended only as a reference for clinicians and not as a replacement for invasive testing. Our implementation aims to explore and refine this strategy with a view to its application in clinical practice soon. After all, safe and effective noninvasive prenatal diagnostic techniques have always been the direction and goal of prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases such as thalassemia. The description concerning this comment was re-written between Pages 20, Lines 358-368, in the "Discussion" section.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

J Francis Borgio

14 Mar 2023

Integration of targeted sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping into clinically assisted decision support for β-thalassemia invasive prenatal diagnosis

PONE-D-22-16457R1

Dear Dr. Chen,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

J Francis Borgio, Ph.D.,

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Revised MS can be accepted

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: No concerns regarding publication data, ethics etc. Author has addressed the comments and incorporated them into the document.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

Acceptance letter

J Francis Borgio

27 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-16457R1

Integration of targeted sequencing and pseudo-tetraploid genotyping into clinically assisted decision support for β-thalassemia invasive prenatal diagnosis

Dear Dr. Chen:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. J Francis Borgio

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Genetic data on thalassemia is prohibited from being transmitted to the public database temporarily by Chinese Law, but it can be disclosed in a restricted way. If necessary, please contact to Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Tel: +867715356557, Fax: +867715359801, Address: No.6, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, Guangxi province, 530021, China. We also provide a point of contact through e-mail which can contact the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, and request access to our data: gxydkyb@163.com.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES