Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1985 May;42(5):336–340.

Accident liability.

J B Kuné
PMCID: PMC1007481  PMID: 3986144

Abstract

The idea of accident proneness, which originated in the early 1900s, has proved to be ineffectual as an operational concept. Discrete econometric methods may be useful to find out which factors are at work in the process that leads to accidents and whether there are individuals who are more liable to accidents than others.

Full text

PDF
336

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cleland J. B. A Preliminary Note on Melanotic Deposits in Cattle and Sheep in Western Australia. Proc R Soc Med. 1909;2(PATHOL):37–40. doi: 10.1177/003591570900201103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. MARITZ J. S. On the validity of inferences drawn from the fitting of Poisson and negative binomial distributions to observed accident data. Psychol Bull. 1950 Sep;47(5):434–443. doi: 10.1037/h0060487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. WEBB W. B. The illusive phenomena in accident proneness. Public Health Rep. 1955 Oct;70(10):951–956. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES