Abstract
In recent years, food irradiation using γ-rays is one of the most valuable practices for insect disinfestation in rice grains for extended shelf life. In this study, flours from four pigmented rice cultivars were exposed to γ-irradiation using 60Co at different doses (0, 5, 10, and 15 kGy). The impact of γ-irradiation on the physico-chemical, functional, and morphological characteristics of pigmented rice flours were analyzed. Results revealed that reduction in amylose content, pH, bulk density, tapped density, and syneresis, while solubility, water absorption capacity, and swelling power values increased significantly (p < 0.05). Pasting characteristics of pigmented rice flours also reduced after exposure to γ-irradiation. Morphological features of pigmented rice flour granules revealed no evidence of physical destruction after irradiation except for black kavuni flour. The structural analysis by FTIR confirms no effect of γ-irradiation on pigmented rice flours. Overall, the study revealed that irradiated pigmented rice flours with enhanced functional properties of less than 10 kGy can be effectively used in the development of value-added rice-based food products considering all the beneficial and safety aspects.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-023-05709-z.
Keywords: Pigmented rice, γ-Irradiation, Antioxidant, Functional characteristics
Introduction
Rice is a one of the most important cereal crops that is consumed as a primary stable food by the world’s majority population (Monks et al. 2013). It stands second in utilization next to wheat in the world’s cereal production, and India ranks second in the production of rice in the world (Bhat and Riar 2017). Though rice constitutes a key part of the South Indian diet, traditionally grown rice was not given patronage because of its variable qualities such as cooking quality and poor sensorial attributes (Ocloo et al. 2017). Traditionally, rice has been consumed in the form of whole grain, but after the green revolution, white or polished rice is the most prevalent type of rice consumed worldwide. In recent years, pigmented rice cultivars including brown, black, and red rice has gained wide recognition among consumers, as they are aware of its unique health benefits, such as protecting the human system against microbial infections, cardiac diseases, cholesterol metabolism, and prostate health (Bhat and Riar 2017).
In recent times, pigmented rice varieties can be used as a source of functional foods that can naturally prevent the oxidation process in foods. Pigmented rice has higher nutritional value than non-pigmented due to the presence of numerous bioactive compounds in the embryo and bran sections containing phytochemical compounds, functional lipids, minerals, vitamins, dietary fiber, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (Reddy et al. 2017; Sultan et al. 2018). The pigmented rice flours with flavonoids and phenolics exhibits diverse unique bioactivities, viz., antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activities, thereby bolstering the overall immune system of the human body, implying that pigmented rice is a source of potential functional food (Bhat and Riar 2017; Reddy et al. 2016).
Recently, pigmented rice flour has been considered the most important cereal flour from a nutritional perspective, and its usage in infant foods, and also for gluten intolerant patients has been increasing (Chinma et al. 2015). Due to its distinctive functional qualities, it has become one of the most vital ingredients in many novel food products like puddings, beverages, tortillas, salad dressings, and gluten-free breads (Falade and Christopher 2015). The utility of rice flour in the food industry for novel food production needs a look at its functional and physicochemical attributes. In modern food systems, functional and physicochemical characteristics of rice play a vital role in establishing the food quality and cooking attributes of rice. However, these properties are subject to change over with storage conditions and post-harvest handling. Modification of flour can be useful in improving the functional and physicochemical attributes of certain components present in food products.
Gamma-irradiation is one of the key modification practices that is widely used in the food processing industry for the modification of biopolymers to their desirable end uses. This irradiation method is mostly preferred as it is fast, low cost, environmentally friendly, and safe (Reddy and Viswanath 2019). FSSAI proposed the best irradiation dose for microbe free sample, to diminish food-borne microbial growth, for cleaning and for commercial sterilization of diverse food groups at about a 0–25 kGy dose range (Zhu et al. 2010). In recent years, the horizon of γ-irradiation has been widely employed worldwide owing to its numerous advantageous effects. This irradiation treatment aids in the inactivation of food-borne pathogens, hinders food allergies, and effectively lengthens the shelf stability of rice flour and rice-based products like rice noodles, murukku, idiyappam, and rice puddings. The use of γ-irradiation is believed as a green technology, which is reliable with the practice of sustainable agriculture. Proximate composition, physical, functional, and antioxidant properties constitute the main criteria for the acceptability and adoption of pigmented rice flour in food systems.
Irradiation processing of foods brings about desired changes in their structural, functional, and physical attributes depending upon dose of γ-irradiation. The influence of gamma treatment was stated on a few attributes of rice flour at specific doses like 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 5, 10, 15 and 20 kGy (Sultan et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2010). Ocloo et al. (2017) reported that ionizing radiation showed a fallen trend towards pH, swelling power, and pasting viscosities, while an increase in trend was observed in solubility for rice cultivars at 0 to 1.5 kGy dosage. Improvements in food safety and reduction of postharvest losses could happen during irradiation of some plant foods at determined doses (Zhu et al. 2010). Sultan et al. (2018) studied the effect of γ-irradiation on the functional, physicochemical, and antioxidant properties of brown rice flour. Their results showed a significant reduction in amylose, foaming capacity, foaming stability, and pasting viscosities. Irradiation of pigmented brown rice flour up to 5 kGy increased its total phenolics and antioxidant activities (Sultan et al. 2018). However, a variety of studies have stated the effect of γ-irradiation on the quality characteristics of rice flour. However, to our knowledge, studies have not been done so far especially in these pigmented rice varieties of Southern India. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of γ-irradiation on changes in morphological, physico-chemical, and functional characteristics, and structural identification of functional groups using FTIR of pigmented rice flours of Southern India.
Materials and methods
Raw materials
Traditional paddy cultivars (2 brown, 1 black and 1 red rice), namely ‘Kattuyanam’ (KYF), ‘Black kavuni’ (BKF), ‘Red kavuni’ (RKF) and ‘Karungkuruvai’ (KKF) were procured from rice farmers in Tamilnadu, India. Prior to use, the paddy samples were dried, cleaned manually, packed in screw-capped plastic containers, and stored at 4 °C for further analysis. All reagents and solvents used for the experimental study were procured from Himedia, Mumbai and of analytical grade.
Pigmented rice flour preparation
The paddy grains were dehusked with the laboratory Husker (THU-34A, Satake Engineering Co., Japan) to obtain the pigmented rice. Flour was prepared from the pigmented rice varieties by grinding the rice grains using Mini Grain Mill (A11B, IKA Inc, Bangalore, India.) The resulting flours were sieved using 100 µm mesh-sieve and kept at 4 °C for further analysis.
Irradiation treatment
Gamma irradiation was executed at Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF), Pondicherry University, India, and irradiation treatments were given in triplicates. The pigmented rice flours (50 g/bag) were irradiated using Cobalt-60 (60Co) γ-irradiator (GC5000, BRIT India) at room temperature (24 ± 1 °C). The irradiation doses of 5, 10, and 15 kGy at dose rate of 2.5 kGy/h were given. Irradiation doses were confirmed by ceric-cerous dosimeter. One of the flour samples from each of the four cultivars was used as control (0 kGy).
Chemical composition of pigmented rice flours
Following the standard AOAC procedures, the fat, protein, ash, and moisture content of pigmented rice flours was quantified. Total dietary fibre (TDF) and amylose content was analyzed, following the procedures described by Savitha and Singh (2011) and Reddy et al. (2017), respectively.
Color characteristics
The color characteristics of pigmented rice flours was analyzed using a Colorimeter (D-25, Hunter Associates Lab, Ruston, USA). Chroma (C) and hue angle was calculated from the obtained Hunter L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) values and the Eqs. (1) and (2) were given below.
| 1 |
| 2 |
Bulk and tapped densities
The relationship between the mass and volume ratio was used to figured out the density of flour. Briefly, 6 g of flour was dispersed into an empty calibrated measuring cylinder of 100 mL from a constant height and cylinder was patted gently until no variation in the volume (V1). Bulk density (pb) was represented as kg/m3 (Wani et al. 2013). Tapped density (pt) was analyzed by carefully tapping 10 times without compacting the flour (V2). The bulk and tapped densities were calculated by the Eqs. (3) and (4) were given below:
| 3 |
| 4 |
pH and carboxyl content
The pH of each flour blend (1 g of flour in 25 ml of water) was determined using a digital pH meter (Hanna, USA) at 25 °C. The carboxyl content of pigmented rice flours was analyzed by the method described by Suriya et al. (2017). The amount of carboxyl content was calculated by the following formula:
Swelling index
The swelling index rice flours was determined by the method of Reddy et al. (2015).
Water absorption capacity (WAC) and water solubility index (WSI)
Flour (0.5 g) on dry basis (db) was suspended with 6 ml of deionized water and kept for incubation in a water bath at 30 °C with continuous shaking for 30 min, then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was placed in hot air oven (105 °C) for drying. The wet sediment and the dried supernatant were weighed.
Pasting properties
The pasting profile of flours were performed using Rapid Visco Analyser-S4 (Perten Instruments Pvt. Ltd., Warriewood, Australia) (Reddy et al. 2015).
Morphological characteristics
Morphological characteristics of pigmented rice flours was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, S-3400N, Tokyo, Japan). Flour sample was fixed on aluminum stubs using double-sided adhesive tape, coated with a thin film of gold (10 nm) under vacuum. Images was taken at × 1.10 k magnification using 15 kV voltage.
Assay for total phenols
Total phenolic content (TPC) was executed using the Folin–Ciocalteau spectrophotometric method (Reddy et al. 2017). Gallic acid was used as the standard and the obtained results were expressed as mg GAE/g of rice flour.
Assay for total flavonoids
Total flavonoid content (TFC) was determined using the method of Chen et al. (2017) with slight modifications. The standard flavonoid used was catechin and the results were expressed as mg CE/g.
Assay for DPPH radical scavenging activity
100 µl of the pigmented rice extract was mixed with methanol (3.9 ml) and DPPH radical methanolic solution (1.0 ml in 1.0 mM). The absorbance was measured against blank (100 µl methanol in 1.0 ml DPPH radical solutions) at 517 nm after incubating in a dark room for 30 min.
Assay for ABTS radical scavenging activity
ABTS (2,2-azino-bis-(3 ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) diammonium salt) radical scavenging activity of flour extract was performed spectrophotometrically by the method of Shen et al. (2009). Results obtained was expressed as mmol Trolox equivalents per g dry weight.
Spectral analysis by FT-IR
The functional groups of native and irradiated pigmented rice flours were determined by using FTIR optical spectrometer (Model: 6700, UK) at room temperature. Spectra achieved were smoothed and baselines were corrected using OPUS software.
Statistical analysis
All experimental analysis was carried out in triplicates. The data collected was analyzed and computed statistically using SPSS 22.0 software package (SPSS Institute Inc., Chicago, USA). Values were manifested as mean ± standard deviation. DMRT test was employed to compute the significance of differences between mean values at p < 0.05.
Results and discussion
Effect of γ-irradiation proximate composition
Table 1 showed the proximate values of native and irradiated pigmented rice flours. From the findings, the protein and moisture content of native pigmented rice flours were at around 11.81–14.30% and 7.42–11.85%, respectively. Irradiation of pigmented rice flours resulted in no changes in protein or moisture content. Darfour et al. (2012) also reported that γ-irradiation did not alter the protein and moisture content of cowpea flour. In this study, the moisture content of irradiated pigmented flours was comparatively lower than that reported by Lee and Kim (2018). The moisture content of all rice flours was low, indicating better starch keeping quality as well as the storage stability of rice (Ocloo et al. 2017). In native pigmented rice flours, there were 66.80–72.49% carbohydrates and 7.04–11.88% dietary fibre in them (Table 1). After γ-irradiation, no changes in quantity of carbohydrates and total dietary fibre content of pigmented flours were noted. The fat and ash content of native pigmented flours were around 4.17–5.42% and 2.17–2.85%, respectively. The γ-irradiation process did not significantly (p < 0.05) affect the fat and ash content of pigmented flours (Table 1). Overall, the proximate constituents of pigmented flours were not significantly influenced by the 15 kGy dose of irradiation.
Table 1.
Proximate composition and apparent amylose content of native and γ-irradiated pigmented rice flours
| Parameter | Dose (kGy) | KYF | BKF | RKF | KKF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein (%) | 0 | 12.64 ± 0.24a | 13.20 ± 0.24a | 11.81 ± 0.24a | 14.30 ± 0.25a |
| 5 | 12.66 ± 0.24a | 13.25 ± 0.22a | 11.86 ± 0.12a | 14.25 ± 0.13a | |
| 10 | 12.68 ± 0.23a | 13.29 ± 0.21a | 11.93 ± 0.15a | 14.41 ± 0.05a | |
| 15 | 12.70 ± 0.24a | 13.33 ± 0.21a | 11.88 ± 0.03a | 14.44 ± 0.04a | |
| Fat (%) | 0 | 4.17 ± 0.02b | 5.29 ± 0.01c | 5.42 ± 0.02b | 5.28 ± 0.01c |
| 5 | 4.20 ± 0.01ab | 5.33 ± 0.02b | 5.45 ± 0.01b | 5.30 ± 0.01c | |
| 10 | 4.19 ± 0.01ab | 5.35 ± 0.01b | 5.48 ± 0.02a | 5.35 ± 0.02b | |
| 15 | 4.22 ± 0.01a | 5.40 ± 0.02a | 5.50 ± 0.01a | 5.39 ± 0.02a | |
| Ash (%) | 0 | 2.17 ± 0.01c | 2.85 ± 0.02b | 2.26 ± 0.06b | 2.45 ± 0.03b |
| 5 | 2.18 ± 0.01bc | 2.88 ± 0.01ab | 2.30 ± 0.02ab | 2.48 ± 0.02ab | |
| 10 | 2.20 ± 0.02b | 2.89 ± 0.01a | 2.33 ± 0.03a | 2.50 ± 0.02a | |
| 15 | 2.23 ± 0.02a | 2.90 ± 0.02a | 2.37 ± 0.02a | 2.51 ± 0.02a | |
| Moisture (%) | 0 | 8.52 ± 0.49a | 11.85 ± 0.13a | 11.20 ± 0.12a | 7.42 ± 0.25a |
| 5 | 8.51 ± 0.46a | 11.83 ± 0.14a | 11.21 ± 0.08a | 7.40 ± 0.05a | |
| 10 | 8.48 ± 0.47a | 11.79 ± 0.09a | 11.19 ± 0.01a | 7.38 ± 0.03a | |
| 15 | 8.47 ± 0.45a | 11.82 ± 0.02a | 11.17 ± 0.03a | 7.33 ± 0.02a | |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 0 | 72.49 ± 0.57a | 66.79 ± 0.27a | 69.31 ± 0.29a | 70.55 ± 0.33a |
| 5 | 72.45 ± 0.52a | 66.69 ± 0.26a | 69.19 ± 0.19ab | 70.57 ± 0.18a | |
| 10 | 72.37 ± 0.53a | 66.63 ± 0.14a | 68.93 ± 0.20ab | 70.24 ± 0.07ab | |
| 15 | 72.29 ± 0.47a | 66.43 ± 0.23a | 68.86 ± 0.03b | 70.03 ± 0.07b | |
| Total dietary fibre (%) | 0 | 9.33 ± 0.12a | 11.88 ± 0.13a | 7.04 ± 0.09b | 10.87 ± 0.11b |
| 5 | 9.36 ± 0.13a | 11.91 ± 0.02a | 7.08 ± 0.04ab | 10.92 ± 0.02ab | |
| 10 | 9.40 ± 0.09a | 11.87 ± 0.15a | 7.13 ± 0.04ab | 10.95 ± 0.03ab | |
| 15 | 9.45 ± 0.11a | 11.86 ± 0.07a | 7.17 ± 0.02a | 10.99 ± 0.02a | |
| Apparent amylose content (%) | 0 | 30.03 ± 0.09a | 27.30 ± 0.08a | 27.28 ± 0.26a | 29.39 ± 0.35a |
| 5 | 27.69 ± 0.61b | 26.85 ± 0.26b | 26.04 ± 0.08b | 26.35 ± 0.31b | |
| 10 | 24.32 ± 0.86c | 24.42 ± 0.08c | 23.69 ± 0.21c | 25.06 ± 0.07c | |
| 15 | 24.19 ± 0.95c | 24.18 ± 0.17c | 23.13 ± 0.24d | 23.34 ± 0.06d |
Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. Means with the same superscript letters within the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 level
Effect of γ-irradiation on apparent amylose content
After γ-irradiation treatment, the levels of apparent amylose (AAC) in all the irradiated pigmented flours were significantly (p < 0.05) reduced (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, the AAC of native and irradiated pigmented flours was observed in the range of 30.03–24.19% (KYF), 27.30–24.18% (BKF), 27.28–23.13% (RKF) and 29.39–23.34% (KKF), respectively. In pigmented rice flours, decline in the volume of amylose might be possible due to the breakdown of amylose polymer into smaller fragments that lower the iodine binding ability of the amylose molecules. Further, γ-irradiation can lower the amount of apparent amylose by interfering with the amylose-iodine bindings in amylose–lipid complexes. Exposure of molecules to γ-irradiation can cause carboxylic acid formation by altering the amylose and amylopectin ratios and can accelerate AAC diminution (Bashir and Haripriya 2016).
Effect of γ-irradiation on optical property
The color values of native and γ-treated rice flours are shown in Table 2. According to the findings, there were significant difference in color values of native and pigmented rice flours with respect to L* (Lightness), a* (Redness) and b* (Yellowness). Results demonstrated that L* value of KYF and BKF was improved with an increase in irradiation dose, while in the case of RKF and KKF, a decrease in trend was observed. The a* value of native flour was 8.01 (KYF), 3.87 (BKF), 8.43 (RKF) and 6.92 (KKF). After γ-irradiation, a decrease in redness (a*) was observed with the rise of the irradiation dose up to 15 kGy. Wani et al. (2015) reported similar findings regarding the decrease in a* value of arrowhead tuber flour with increasing dose of irradiation up to 15 kGy. Hunter color b* value, however, increased significantly (p < 0.05) from 10.86–12.16 (KYF), 4.18–5.95 (BKF), 12.44–13.31 (RKF) and 11.04–12.93 (KKF) with the lowest value for native rice flour and the highest value for 15 kGy. Thus, rather than caramelization, the color change in pigmented rice flour could be attributed to the Maillard reaction between protein residues and sugars or the alteration of residual phenolics (Zhu et al. 2010).
Table 2.
Density and color attributes of native and γ-irradiated pigmented rice flours
| Parameter | Dose (kGy) | KYF | BKF | RKF | KKF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulk density (kg/m3) | 0 | 501.67 ± 1.66a | 428.97 ± 0.49a | 417.22 ± 0.32a | 398.41 ± 0.66a |
| 5 | 497.52 ± 1.13b | 425.37 ± 1.45b | 411.60 ± 0.64b | 395.12 ± 0.95b | |
| 10 | 494.41 ± 1.02c | 421.52 ± 1.02c | 408.97 ± 0.61c | 392.71 ± 1.12c | |
| 15 | 492.86 ± 0.36c | 419.03 ± 0.95d | 406.86 ± 0.57d | 389.59 ± 0.56d | |
| Tapped bulk density (kg/m3) | 0 | 528.07 ± 1.75a | 474.12 ± 0.55a | 455.15 ± 0.35a | 416.51 ± 0.69a |
| 5 | 524.78 ± 0.59b | 470.63 ± 0.82b | 450.71 ± 0.45b | 413.04 ± 0.96b | |
| 10 | 520.03 ± 0.18c | 467.57 ± 1.16c | 448.66 ± 0.39c | 409.86 ± 0.68c | |
| 15 | 516.62 ± 0.62d | 465.97 ± 1.00c | 445.60 ± 0.62d | 406.89 ± 0.78d | |
| Color parameters | |||||
| L* | 0 | 69.52 ± 1.02b | 52.81 ± 0.39c | 68.06 ± 0.25a | 69.89 ± 0.02a |
| 5 | 70.87 ± 1.53ab | 59.76 ± 0.10a | 67.65 ± 1.43a | 67.08 ± 0.51bc | |
| 10 | 71.94 ± 0.18a | 59.32 ± 0.11a | 68.04 ± 1.49a | 68.19 ± 0.19b | |
| 15 | 71.53 ± 0.09a | 58.29 ± 0.27b | 68.21 ± 0.21a | 66.11 ± 1.24c | |
| a* | 0 | 8.01 ± 0.03a | 3.87 ± 0.05a | 8.43 ± 0.04a | 6.92 ± 0.01c |
| 5 | 7.74 ± 0.08b | 3.85 ± 0.01a | 7.84 ± 0.25b | 7.26 ± 0.07a | |
| 10 | 7.70 ± 0.05b | 3.81 ± 0.03a | 7.90 ± 0.02b | 7.14 ± 0.02b | |
| 15 | 7.75 ± 0.01b | 3.86 ± 0.04a | 8.04 ± 0.03b | 7.12 ± 0.07b | |
| b* | 0 | 10.86 ± 0.13c | 4.18 ± 0.12d | 12.44 ± 0.09b | 11.04 ± 0.02c |
| 5 | 11.41 ± 0.16b | 5.45 ± 0.02c | 12.35 ± 0.44b | 12.51 ± 0.10b | |
| 10 | 11.96 ± 0.09a | 5.75 ± 0.05b | 13.06 ± 0.08a | 12.89 ± 0.01a | |
| 15 | 12.16 ± 0.01a | 5.95 ± 0.03a | 13.31 ± 0.03a | 12.93 ± 0.11a | |
| Hue angle | 0 | 53.59 ± 0.25d | 47.17 ± 1.17c | 55.87 ± 0.12c | 57.91 ± 0.05d |
| 5 | 55.87 ± 0.13c | 54.77 ± 0.06b | 57.59 ± 0.09b | 59.85 ± 0.06c | |
| 10 | 57.22 ± 0.03b | 56.45 ± 0.32a | 58.81 ± 0.09a | 60.99 ± 0.07b | |
| 15 | 57.49 ± 0.05a | 57.05 ± 0.29a | 58.87 ± 0.13a | 61.15 ± 0.02a | |
| Chroma | 0 | 13.49 ± 0.12c | 5.70 ± 0.05d | 15.03 ± 0.09bc | 13.03 ± 0.02c |
| 5 | 13.79 ± 0.17b | 6.67 ± 0.02c | 14.63 ± 0.51c | 14.46 ± 0.12b | |
| 10 | 14.22 ± 0.10a | 6.89 ± 0.04b | 15.26 ± 0.08ab | 14.73 ± 0.07a | |
| 15 | 14.42 ± 0.01a | 7.09 ± 0.03a | 15.55 ± 0.09a | 14.76 ± 0.13a | |
Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. Means with the same superscript letters within the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 level
The hue angle of the native rice flour was 53.59 (KYF), 47.17 (BKF), 55.87 (RKF) and 57.91 (KKF), which was increased in irradiated flours (Table 2). The values for irradiated flours showed an increased trend from 53.59–57.49 (KYF), 47.17–57.05 (BKF), 55.87–58.87 (RKF) and 57.91–61.15 (KKF), with the highest value being recorded at 15 kGy dose. The chroma value of native flour was noted as 13.49 (KYF), 5.70 (BKF), 15.03 (RKF) and 13.03 (KKF), respectively, which was enhanced to 14.42, 7.09, 15.55, and 14.76 at 15 kGy doses. Reduction in lightness (L*) and redness (a*) with an increase in yellowness (b*) and chroma intensity indicates that pigmented flours were darker with an enormous amount of yellow tint, which in turn was caused by the caramelization of simple carbohydrates during high energy exposure (Abu et al. 2006).
Effect of γ-irradiation on functional properties
Bulk and tapped densities
Bulk density and tapped density of flour are key factors in the design of devices used for grain handling and storage, such as silos and hoppers (Nalladurai et al. 2002). The bulk density of the native rice flour samples (KKF < RKF < BKF < KYF) showed significant difference ranging from 398.41 − 501.67 kg/m3 respectively (Table 2). The bulk density of the irradiated rice flour samples decreased (KKF < RKF < BKF < KYF) from 395.12 kg/m3 to 497.52 kg/m3 at 5 kGy dose. Thereafter, the bulk density was reduced significantly (p < 0.05) with an increase in irradiation dose, and the least values were recorded as 492.86 kg/m3 (KYF), 406.86 kg/m3 (RKF), 419.03 kg/m3 (BKF) and 389.59 kg/m3 (KKF) in the samples irradiated with 15 kGy. The tapped density of the native rice flours (0 kGy) samples order as follows: KKF < RKF < BKF < KYF. The tapped density and bulk density of the irradiated flour was decreased significantly (p < 0.05) when compared with the native rice flour with respect to the increase in dosage. From Table 2, it is clear that flour treated with gamma-irradiation diminishes the bulk and tapped density of flour by up to 15 kGy, which is significantly lower than standard flour, which might be because of potent degradation of starch molecules present in the flour samples (Rombo et al. 2001).
Carboxyl content and pH
The levels of pH values and carboxyl content for native and irradiated pigmented rice flours are given in Table 3. Results demonstrated that carboxyl content increased significantly with an increasing dose of γ-irradiation. However, the percent increase in carboxyl content was higher in RKF when compared to other flours. The highest carboxyl content was found for 15 kGy dose treated flour. The increase in carboxyl content of native and γ-treated flours might be possible not only due to free radical oxidation breakdown, but also to starch molecule breakdown (Reddy and Viswanath 2019). This shift in carboxyl content could also be ascribed to variations in the generation of carboxylic acids due to free radical action (Suriya et al. 2017). The pH values of native pigmented rice flours are 6.31 (KYF), 6.61 (BKF), 6.65 (RKF) and 6.70 (KKF), respectively (Table 3). An increase in dosage noted a reduction in pH of the flour blends. The decrease in pH values was mainly owing to the partial interruption of starch fragments by γ-rays, thereby inducing the increase of carboxylic acid (Suriya et al. 2017).
Table 3.
Functional properties of native and γ-irradiated pigmented rice flours
| Parameters | Dose (kGy) | KYF | BKF | RKF | KKF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carboxyl content (%) | 0 | 0.53 ± 0.01d | 0.49 ± 0.01d | 0.78 ± 0.02d | 0.69 ± 0.01d |
| 5 | 0.61 ± 0.01c | 0.58 ± 0.01c | 0.89 ± 0.01c | 0.74 ± 0.01c | |
| 10 | 0.62 ± 0.01b | 0.58 ± 0.01b | 0.94 ± 0.02b | 0.78 ± 0.01b | |
| 15 | 0.69 ± 0.01a | 0.60 ± 0.01a | 0.99 ± 0.01a | 0.90 ± 0.01a | |
| pH | 0 | 6.31 ± 0.05a | 6.61 ± 0.01a | 6.65 ± 0.03a | 6.70 ± 0.01a |
| 5 | 6.21 ± 0.04b | 6.56 ± 0.01b | 6.53 ± 0.03b | 6.59 ± 0.01b | |
| 10 | 6.19 ± 0.06b | 6.47 ± 0.04c | 6.52 ± 0.01b | 6.42 ± 0.01c | |
| 15 | 5.98 ± 0.05c | 6.09 ± 0.01d | 6.20 ± 0.04c | 6.18 ± 0.01d | |
| Swelling power (g/g) | 0 | 7.85 ± 0.28d | 7.61 ± 0.15c | 8.39 ± 0.25d | 5.78 ± 0.03d |
| 5 | 10.09 ± 0.10b | 8.05 ± 0.05b | 10.91 ± 0.03a | 9.07 ± 0.03b | |
| 10 | 10.38 ± 0.02a | 8.19 ± 0.01b | 10.28 ± 0.03b | 9.44 ± 0.03a | |
| 15 | 8.75 ± 0.06c | 9.37 ± 0.03a | 8.79 ± 0.01c | 7.78 ± 0.03c | |
| Water absorption capacity (%) | 0 | 240.96 ± 1.67c | 247.33 ± 1.92b | 253.61 ± 0.54c | 250.09 ± 0.69d |
| 5 | 232.32 ± 0.71d | 252.64 ± 0.99a | 261.87 ± 0.88a | 266.37 ± 0.86b | |
| 10 | 251.21 ± 0.33a | 254.83 ± 0.87a | 257.95 ± 0.85b | 269.63 ± 0.45a | |
| 15 | 248.46 ± 1.08b | 238.41 ± 1.49c | 237.04 ± 1.08d | 264.53 ± 1.10c | |
| Water solubility index (%) | 0 | 2.96 ± 0.02c | 3.19 ± 0.01c | 3.69 ± 0.01b | 3.11 ± 0.02d |
| 5 | 3.86 ± 0.01a | 3.94 ± 0.02b | 3.63 ± 0.01c | 3.34 ± 0.01b | |
| 10 | 2.98 ± 0.02c | 4.16 ± 0.02a | 4.37 ± 0.01a | 3.56 ± 0.01a | |
| 15 | 3.57 ± 0.02b | 3.92 ± 0.02b | 4.37 ± 0.01a | 3.29 ± 0.01c |
Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. Means with the same superscript letters within the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 level
Swelling index
The swelling index of the native and irradiated pigmented rice flours is illustrated in Table 3. The swelling index of rice flour increased significantly with the rise of irradiation dose and revealed a possible reduction at 15 kGy dosage. Wani et al. (2015) found that degradation of amylopectin chains by gamma-irradiation caused a diminution in the swelling of flour, whilst the swelling power of rice flour granules is presumably due to the amylopectin fraction rather than the amylose molecules. De Kerf et al. (2001) found a significant decrease in amylopectin fragments of irradiated starches. The texture of the cooked food would be better because the swelling power would be less. This could be a good thing because the shattering of starch could be slowed down.
Water absorption capacity (WAC) and solubility
In Table 3, the WAC and solubility of native and irradiated pigmented rice flours are depicted. The WAC of pigmented rice flours increased significantly (p < 0.05) upon irradiation. The WAC of native rice flours is 240.96% (KYF), 247.33% (BKF), 253.61% (RKF) and 250.09% (KKF) respectively. Higher WAC of gamma-treated rice flours could be attributed to partial degradation of starch to dextrin, disaccharides, and monosaccharides with higher water affinity (Abu et al. 2006). The high WAC of gamma-treated flours is advantageous for use in the formulation of food products such as breads, sausages, and buns, extending freshness and shelf life (Wani et al. 2015). The highest WAC was recorded for 10 kGy treated flour (Table 3). However, further increments in irradiation dosage cause a reduction in the WAC of flour. This decrease in WAC might be due to polymer cross-linking that occurred concurrently with chain scission at a 15 kGy dose.
With an increase in irradiation doses for the flour samples, there was a significant increase in water solubility index (WSI) (Table 3). Wani et al. (2015) stated that the presence of soluble fragments like albumin, sugars, and amylose aids the solubility of flours. As a result, gamma irradiation depolymerizes the starch molecules into smaller fragments and hence it increases the smaller chain production, which can be easily dissolved by surrounding water molecules. As a result, it produces a large number of hydrogen bonds, which increases the solubility of flour.
Pasting properties
The pasting behaviors of the native and irradiated flours are shown in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2. Significant reductions (p < 0.05) in peak viscosity, hold, final, setback and breakdown viscosities were noted in pigmented flours by dose-dependent manner with increasing irradiation dose. The peak viscosity of native rice flours was 2040.0 cP (KYF), 1190.7 cP (BKF), 2069.33 cP (RKF) and 1378.33 cP (KKF), respectively. Chung and Liu (2010) stated that a substantial reduction in the peak viscosity of flours after irradiation might be possible due to the depletion of starch swelling index and degradation of amylose and amylopectin through chain scission. The disruption of starch particles caused by shearing and heating resulted in a reduction in hold viscosity. The re-ordering of leached amylose and long-linear amylopectin shortening is substantially responsible for the setback and final viscosities. Drastic reduction in the values of setback viscosity results in disruption of starch molecular structure that causes inability to develop longer helical networks and association between starch polymers, hence the induction of minimal starch retrogradation (Ocloo et al. 2017). The decrease in setback value also indicates that the food products produced from irradiated flour have a softer texture. Breakdown viscosity, which measures the ability of starch molecules to resist shear force during heating, decreased after irradiation. Diminution in breakdown viscosity stipulates that the irradiated flours are highly resistant to shear thinning during cooking. Pasting temperatures of native flours were 80.0 °C (KYF), 82.0 °C (BKF), 79.90 °C (RKF), and 87.23 °C (KKF), and decreased significantly after irradiation, indicating that starch granules have an increased ability to expand freely. Gamma irradiation causes a reduction in rice viscosities, which makes it unsuitable as a thickener but suitable for foods like porridges and any other food in which solids need to be added to enhance the quantity and quality of the child’s nutritional aspects as well as be used as fillers in starch matrix (Ocloo et al. 2017).
Morphological characteristics
The microscopic images of native and irradiated flours are displayed in Fig. 1. The size of the starch granules was varied from small to large, with different sizes and shapes, and agglomerated with some molecules. These molecules were the incidence of fibre, minerals, and protein bodies shattered during milling (Wani et al. 2015). The granules revealed spherical, polyhedral, and irregular shapes with varying sizes. There was no significant difference observed after irradiation of the flour samples except for BKF. In BKF, the surface of the native flour was smooth in texture, whereas in irradiated flour, the surface became rough, tightly packed, and more agglomeration was observed in 10 and 15 kGy treated flour. Flour did not show any superficial changes in shape and size after irradiation.
Fig. 1.

Scanning electron micrographs of native and gamma-irradiated pigmented rice flours. A-KYF 0 kGy, B-KYF 5 kGy, C-KYF 10 kGy, D-KYF 15 kGy, E-BKF 0 kGy, F-BKF 5 kGy, G-BKF 10 kGy, H-BKF 15 kGy, I-RKF 0 kGy, J-RKF 5 kGy, K-RKF 10 kGy, L-RKF 15 kGy, M-KKF 0 kGy, N-KKF 5 kGy, O-KKF 10 kGy, P-KKF 15 kGy
Total phenolic content
The effect of γ-irradiation on total phenolic content (TPC) in all native and irradiated rice flours is showed in Table 4. TPC values for native pigmented flours are 5.99 mg GAE/g (KYF), 3.33 mg GAE/g (BKF), 5.89 mg GAE/g (RKF), and 4.59 mg GAE/g (KKF), respectively. Results demonstrated that the γ-irradiation significantly (p < 0.05) altered, either reduced or enhanced the phenolic content in all rice flours as compared to their native counterparts. For KYF and KKF, γ-irradiation significantly increased their TPC as compared with native flour in a dose-dependent manner. However, in RKF, γ-irradiation at 5 kGy attained the highest TPC (10.23 mg GAE/g) as compared to native counterpart. For BKF, irradiation significantly (p < 0.05) improved their TPC, but their growth was not in a dose-dependent manner. Zhu et al. (2010) reported that γ-irradiation at specific doses enhance the antioxidant activities of flours. The variance in phenolic content of rice flours might be possible due to the stimulation of specific enzymes during irradiation treatment, resulting in improved or reduced the synthesis of phenolic compounds (Sultan et al. 2018). Thus, it is plausible that γ-irradiation may disrupt the phenolic acids resulting in a reduction of the content and activate some enzyme inducing the synthesis of the phenolic acids Zhu et al. 2010). In addition, the variance in phenolic content of rice flour might be possible due to release of phenolic compounds from the glycosidic compounds and with the degradation of larger phenolic compounds into smaller ones by γ-irradiation (Santos et al. 2022).
Table 4.
Antioxidant properties of native and γ-irradiated pigmented rice flours
| Parameters | Dose (kGy) | KYF | BKF | RKF | KKF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g) | 0 | 5.99 ± 0.11c | 3.33 ± 0.02c | 5.89 ± 0.20d | 4.59 ± 0.11d |
| 5 | 8.48 ± 0.06b | 3.99 ± 0.05a | 10.23 ± 0.10a | 5.48 ± 0.07c | |
| 10 | 8.71 ± 0.19b | 3.45 ± 0.13c | 7.59 ± 0.16b | 7.82 ± 0.11b | |
| 15 | 9.40 ± 0.25a | 3.77 ± 0.11b | 7.14 ± 0.11c | 8.99 ± 0.21a | |
| Total flavonoid content (mg CE/g) | 0 | 71.10 ± 2.36a | 44.08 ± 0.38a | 84.40 ± 0.95a | 51.33 ± 2.02b |
| 5 | 60.60 ± 2.07b | 42.93 ± 2.01a | 66.18 ± 0.85b | 47.30 ± 0.70c | |
| 10 | 51.41 ± 1.61c | 36.30 ± 2.68b | 54.35 ± 1.60c | 60.23 ± 1.17a | |
| 15 | 51.78 ± 2.05c | 42.33 ± 0.96a | 53.63 ± 1.39c | 58.23 ± 2.57a | |
| DPPH (%) | 0 | 99.45 ± 0.14a | 95.48 ± 0.24a | 99.52 ± 0.00a | 99.61 ± 0.04a |
| 5 | 98.59 ± 0.51ab | 93.24 ± 0.46b | 98.86 ± 0.03b | 98.94 ± 0.03b | |
| 10 | 98.68 ± 0.21ab | 91.99 ± 0.63c | 98.51 ± 0.44b | 98.85 ± 0.04c | |
| 15 | 98.07 ± 0.73b | 92.63 ± 0.10bc | 98.53 ± 0.32b | 98.71 ± 0.03d | |
| ABTS (mmol TE/g) | 0 | 453.43 ± 1.15a | 207.80 ± 2.30c | 452.39 ± 0.01a | 433.14 ± 0.63a |
| 5 | 399.93 ± 5.39c | 226.65 ± 2.92b | 364.32 ± 3.59bc | 305.70 ± 1.20d | |
| 10 | 435.15 ± 4.74b | 230.39 ± 4.41b | 354.29 ± 1.61c | 381.09 ± 1.94c | |
| 15 | 446.31 ± 5.50a | 247.79 ± 2.18a | 373.24 ± 2.15b | 414.27 ± 1.07b |
Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. Means with the same superscript letters within the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 level. mg GAE/g, mg gallic acid equivalent per gram; mg CE/g, mg catechin equivalent per gram; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl; ABTS (mmol TE/g), 2,2-azino-bis-(3 ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) diammonium salt (mmol trolox equivalent per gram)
Total flavonoid content
Flavonoids are a group of secondary metabolites with potent antioxidant capacity and metal chelating properties. TFC of native flours is 71.10 mg CE/g (KYF), 44.08 mg CE/g (BKF), 84.40 mg CE/g (RKF), and 51.33 mg CE/g (KKF), respectively (Table 4). Reduction in the TFC of rice flour samples was observed with an increase in irradiation doses. For KKF, a significant increase was noted in 10 kGy dosage when compared to their analogous native sample. Verma et al. (2016) also reported a significant decrease or increase in TFC in different mungbean cultivars upon irradiation. The generation of free radicals during γ-irradiation modifies the structure of flavonoids, which consequently decreased solubility in the extraction medium and hence a decrease in trend was observed in TFC. The creation of novel flavonoids by breakdown of bigger flavonoids could explain the increase in TFC in 10 and 15 kGy dosages for KKF.
ABTS radical scavenging activity
The antioxidant potential of native and irradiated flours was analyzed by using the ABTS radical scavenging method (Table 4). As a result, γ-irradiation at various dosage levels resulted in a significant difference (p < 0.05), although not in a dose-dependent manner. A significant reduction in radical scavenging activity was observed for KYF, RKF, and KKF, respectively. But the BKF rice cultivar showed an increasing trend with increasing irradiation dose, but not in a dose-dependent manner. According to Chawla et al. (2009), the maillard reaction may be responsible for the development of novel derivates due to increased antioxidant activity in rice flour samples.
DPPH radical scavenging activity
In Table 4, the DPPH radical scavenging activity (RSA) of native and gamma-treated rice flours is depicted. A decrease in absorbance at 517 nm defines the reaction between DPPH and phytochemicals, as well as the antioxidant reducing ability of pigmented whole grains (Bhat and Riar 2017). With increasing irradiation dose, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in RSA of rice flour was observed, but not in a dose-dependent manner. The decrease in RSA of rice flours could be owing to the decline of phenolic compounds. The native KKF recorded the highest antioxidant activity (99.61%). The irradiated pigmented rice flour showed an increase in antioxidant activity at a 5 kGy dosage (98.94%). This increase in antioxidant activity may be the result of the maillard reaction, which would have formed novel derivative compounds. Reduction in RSA of samples might be owing to the development of free radicals and higher doses of γ-irradiation in samples.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
The FTIR spectroscopy proved to be a dynamic tool for identifying the presence of functional groups as well as substantiating the reduction of starch double helical crystalline order and glycosidic bond disruption. Spectrum of native and irradiated flours of various rice cultivars is depicted in Fig. 2. After irradiation, the spectrum remained unchanged, and no new functional compounds were formed. This confirms that the flour treated with gamma irradiation did not produce any new compounds. The band 3395 cm−1 in the area of 3300–3600 cm−1 corresponds to O–H stretching complex with strong intensity. Peak at 2931 cm−1 represents the C–H stretching vibration mode. Two prominent peaks 1545 cm−1 and 1645 cm−1 primarily correspond to coupling of NH deformation (amide II) and C=O stretching (amide I) especially in proteins where the hydrogen bonding abilities of amide linkages partly take place in the protein secondary structure. Band at 1412 cm−1 represents C–N in primary amide (Amide II). Sharp band at 1155 cm−1 and 1080 cm−1 are usually assigned to the coupling of stretching C–C and C–O and bending C–O–H band, respectively. Absorption IR peak at 1022 cm−1 is associated to amorphous starch structure (Suriya et al. 2017). IR peaks below 1000 cm−1 (called as fingerprint region) with bands at 930 cm−1 (amylose (α-1,4) linkage), 859 cm−1 (C–O–C ring mode and C1-H deformation mode) and 764 cm−1 (C–C stretching), respectively.
Fig. 2.
FTIR spectrum of native and gamma-irradiated pigmented rice flours
Conclusion
The current study revealed that pigmented rice flour irradiated at a dosage of 5–15 kGy exhibited significant changes with enhancement in irradiation dosage in various characteristics like amylose, bulk density, tapped density, color attributes, carboxyl content, pH, syneresis, swelling power, water absorption capacity, water solubility, total phenol, total flavonoid and ABTS radical scavenging activity. At the same time, significant changes were not observed in morphological characteristics and spectral analysis using FTIR. The pasting viscosities of the irradiated rice flours reduced drastically which is advantageous in formulation of novel baby food products. Further, pigmented rice flour irradiated less than 10 kGy helps to minimize the loss of phenolic acids and can be effectively used in the development of value-added rice-based food products considering all over beneficial and safety aspects.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The first and second author is thankful to the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India for granting financial assistance in the form of Junior Research Fellowship (Grant No. 12688/NET-DEC 2013 and Grant No. 1538/NET-JUNE 2013). Thanks to SVR Sriram for his kind support for providing the raw materials in time.
Author contributions
SM: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review and Editing; MK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Data curation; SH: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—Review and Editing; JD: Formal analysis, Visualization, Investigation; CMB: Formal analysis, Visualization, Investigation; PG: Formal analysis, Investigation; CKR: Writing—Review and Editing. The article has not been submitted for publication in any other journal and this submission is with the approval by all the authors.
Funding
Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.
Data availability
The data generated during this research work is available with the authors.
Code availability
Not applicable to the study.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts in the submission and publication of the work.
Consent to participate
All the authors have given the consent to participate in the work.
Consent for publication
The authors have no objection in the publication of data in tables or figures presented in this paper.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Haripriya Sundaramoorthy, Email: shprieya@gmail.com.
Chagam Koteswara Reddy, Email: koteswarreddychagam@gmail.com.
References
- Abu JO, Müller K, Duodu KG, Minnaar A. Gamma irradiation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) flours and pastes: effects on functional, thermal and molecular properties of isolated proteins. Food Chem. 2006;95:138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bashir M, Haripriya S. Physicochemical and structural evaluation of alkali extracted chickpea starch as affected by γ-irradiation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;89:279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhat FM, Riar CS. Extraction, identification and assessment of antioxidative compounds of bran extracts of traditional rice cultivars: an analytical approach. Food Chem. 2017;237:264–274. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chawla S, Chander R, Sharma A. Antioxidant properties of Maillard reaction products obtained by gamma-irradiation of whey proteins. Food Chem. 2009;116:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X, Li X, Mao X, Huang H, Wang T, Qu Z, Gao W. Effects of drying processes on starch-related physicochemical properties, bioactive components and antioxidant properties of yam flours. Food Chem. 2017;224:224–232. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chinma CE, Anuonye JC, Simon OC, Ohiare RO, Danbaba N. Effect of germination on the physicochemical and antioxidant characteristics of rice flour from three rice varieties from Nigeria. Food Chem. 2015;185:454–458. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chung H-J, Liu Q. Molecular structure and physicochemical properties of potato and bean starches as affected by gamma-irradiation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2010;47:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darfour B, Wilson D, Ofosu D, Ocloo F. Physical, proximate, functional and pasting properties of flour produced from gamma irradiated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, L. Walp) Radiat Phys Chem. 2012;81:450–457. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- De Kerf M, Mondelaers W, Lahorte P, Vervaet C, Remon JP. Characterisation and disintegration properties of irradiated starch. Int J Pharm. 2001;221:69–76. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00655-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falade KO, Christopher AS. Physical, functional, pasting and thermal properties of flours and starches of six Nigerian rice cultivars. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;44:478–490. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee N-Y, Kim J-K. Effects of gamma radiation on the physicochemical properties of brown rice and changes in the quality of porridge. Radiat Phys Chem. 2018;152:89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.07.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Monks JLF, Vanier NL, Casaril J, Berto RM, de Oliveira M, Gomes CB. Effects of milling on proximate composition, folic acid, fatty acids and technological properties of rice. J Food Compos Anal. 2013;30:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nalladurai K, Alagusundaram K, Gayathri P. PH—postharvest technology: airflow resistance of paddy and its byproducts. Biosyst Eng. 2002;83:67–75. doi: 10.1006/bioe.2002.0091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ocloo FC, Owureku-Asare M, Agyei-Amponsah J, Agbemavor WS, Egblewogbe MN, Apea-Bah FB. Effect of gamma irradiation on physicochemical, functional and pasting properties of some locally-produced rice (Oryza spp) cultivars in Ghana. Radiat Phys Chem. 2017;130:196–201. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.08.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Perera C, Hoover R. Influence of hydroxypropylation on retrogradation properties of native, defatted and heat-moisture treated potato starches. Food Chem. 1999;64:361–375. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00130-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy CK, Haripriya S, Vidya PV. Morphology, physico-chemical and functional characteristics of starches from different banana cultivars. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52:7289–7296. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1809-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy CK, Kimi L, Haripriya S. Variety difference in molecular structure, functional properties, phytochemical content and antioxidant capacity of pigmented rice. J Food Meas Charact. 2016;10:605–613. doi: 10.1007/s11694-016-9344-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy CK, Kimi L, Haripriya S, Kang N. Effects of polishing on proximate composition, physico-chemical characteristics, mineral composition and antioxidant properties of pigmented rice. Rice Sci. 2017;24:241–252. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2017.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy CK, Viswanath KK. Impact of γ-irradiation on physicochemical characteristics, lipoxygenase activity and antioxidant properties of finger millet. J Food Sci Technol. 2019;56:2651–2659. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-03753-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rombo GO, Taylor JRN, Minnaar A. Effect of irradiation, with and without cooking of maize and kidney bean flours, on porridge viscosity and in vitro starch digestibility. J Sci Food Agric. 2001;81:497–502. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.838. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Santos ALd, Morais RA, Soares CMdS, Vellano PO, Martins GAdS, Damiani C, Souza ARMd. Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical, functional and bioactive properties of red pitaya (Hylocereus costaricensis) bark flour. Radiat Phys Chem. 2022;199:110371. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Savitha Y, Singh V. Status of dietary fiber contents in pigmented and non-pigmented rice varieties before and after parboiling. LWT. 2011;44:2180–2184. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Y, Jin L, Xiao P, Lu Y, Bao J. Total phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity in rice grain and their relations to grain color, size and weight. J Cereal Sci. 2009;49:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sultan N, Wani IA, Masoodi FA. Moisture mediated effects of γ-irradiation on physicochemical, functional, and antioxidant properties of pigmented brown rice (Oryza sativa L.) flour. J Cereal Sci. 2018;79:399–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.10.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Suriya M, Rethina C, Bashir M, Reddy CK, Harsha N, Haripriya S. Impact of γ-irradiation on physicochemical properties of freeze dried Amorphophallus paeoniifolius flour. Food Chem. 2017;234:276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verma M, Sharma P, Gour VS, Kothari S. Moisture-mediated effects of γ-irradiation on antioxidant properties of mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) cultivars. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;34:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wani IA, Sogi DS, Wani AA, Gill BS. Physico-chemical and functional properties of flours from Indian kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. LWT. 2013;53:278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wani IA, Wani AA, Gani A, Muzzaffar S, Gul MK, Masoodi FA, Wani TA. Effect of gamma-irradiation on physico-chemical and functional properties of arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolia L.) tuber flour. Food Biosci. 2015;11:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2015.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu F, Cai Y-Z, Bao J, Corke H. Effect of γ-irradiation on phenolic compounds in rice grain. Food Chem. 2010;120:74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data generated during this research work is available with the authors.
Not applicable to the study.

