Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1986 Jun;43(6):363–373. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.6.363

Cancer mortality in the British rubber industry: 1946-80.

T Sorahan, H G Parkes, C A Veys, J A Waterhouse
PMCID: PMC1007665  PMID: 3718880

Abstract

The mortality experienced by a cohort of 36445 rubber workers during 1946-80 has been investigated. These workers were all male operatives first employed in any one of the 13 participating factories in 1946-60; all had worked continuously in the industry for a minimum period of one year. Compared with the general population, statistically significant excesses relating to cancer mortality were found for cancer of the stomach (E = 245.9, O = 282, SMR = 115), primary cancer of the liver (E = 12.8, O = 22, SMR = 172), cancer of the lung (E = 892.7, O = 1191, SMR = 133), and all neoplasms (E = 2165.2, O = 2487, SMR = 115). Statistically significant deficits were found for cancer of the prostate (E = 79.7, O = 59, SMR = 74) and cancer of the testis (E = 10.3, O = 4, SMR = 39). The method of regression models in life tables (RMLT) was used to compare the duration of employment in the industry, the duration in "dust exposed" jobs, and the duration in "fume and/or solvent exposed" jobs of those dying from causes of interest with those of all matching survivors. Significant positive associations were found only for cancer of the stomach and cancer of the lung. The results of the RMLT analysis are independent of those from the SMR analysis, and the study has provided further evidence of a causal association between the risks of lung and stomach cancer and certain occupational exposures in the rubber industry.

Full text

PDF
363

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fox A. J., Collier P. F. Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1976 Dec;30(4):225–230. doi: 10.1136/jech.30.4.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Holmberg B., Westerholm P., Maasing R., Kestrup L., Gumaelius K., Holmlund L., Englund A. Retrospective cohort study of two plants in the Swedish rubber industry. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1983;9 (Suppl 2):59–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kneale G. W., Mancuso T. F., Stewart A. M. Hanford radiation study III: a cohort study of the cancer risks from radiation to workers at Hanford (1944-77 deaths) by the method of regression models in life-tables. Br J Ind Med. 1981 May;38(2):156–166. doi: 10.1136/oem.38.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Norell S., Ahlbom A., Lipping H., Osterblom L. Oesophageal cancer and vulcanisation work. Lancet. 1983 Feb 26;1(8322):462–463. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91453-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Parkes H. G., Veys C. A., Waterhouse J. A., Peters A. Cancer mortality in the British rubber industry. Br J Ind Med. 1982 Aug;39(3):209–220. doi: 10.1136/oem.39.3.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sorahan T., Waterhouse J. A. Mortality study of nickel-cadmium battery workers by the method of regression models in life tables. Br J Ind Med. 1983 Aug;40(3):293–300. doi: 10.1136/oem.40.3.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES