Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2023 Mar 22;2023:10.17912/micropub.biology.000776. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000776

Hypoxia induces food leaving in C. elegans

Longjun Pu 1,2,3,#, Lina Zhao 1,2,3,#, Qiongxuan Lu 1,2,3,§, Changchun Chen 1,2,3,§
Reviewed by: Anonymous
PMCID: PMC10077061  PMID: 37033703

Abstract

Hypoxia alters eating behavior in different animals. In C. elegans , hypoxia induces a strong food leaving response. We found that this behavior was independent of the known O 2 response mechanisms including acute O 2 sensation and HIF-1 signaling of chronic hypoxia response. Mutating egl-3 and egl-21 , encoding the neuropeptide pro-protein convertase and carboxypeptidase, led to defects in hypoxia induced food leaving, suggesting that neuropeptidergic signaling was required for this response. However, we failed to identify any neuropeptide mutants that were severely defective in hypoxia induced food leaving, suggesting that multiple neuropeptides act redundantly to modulate this behavior.


Figure 1. Hypoxia evokes food leaving response in C. elegans .


Figure 1.

Hypoxia evokes food leaving response in
C. elegans

(A) Representative images showing food leaving of wild type animals ( N2 ) in 1% O 2 for 0, 12 and 24 hours. (B) Lawn occupancy of wild type animals in the indicated O 2 concentrations for 0, 4, 12 and 24 hours. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Three independent experiments were performed with three technical replicates for each strain in each experiment. *, p <0.05; ***, p <0.001; ****, p <0.0001; NS = not significant. One way ANOVA with Tukey's test. (C) Video tracking of lawn occupancy of wild type animals in 1% O 2 for 4 hours. 5 videos were acquired. The average lawn occupancy of 5 videos was plotted every 10 minutes. Error bars indicate SEM. (D) Lawn occupancy of wild type animals on dead bacteria for 0, 4, 12 and 24 hours in 21% O 2 (blue) and 1% O 2 (red). Three independent experiments were performed with three technical replicates for each strain in each experiment. **, p <0.01; ****, p <0.0001. One way ANOVA with Tukey's test. (E) Lawn occupancy of wild type, dyf-3 ( m185 ) , bbs-9 ( gk471 ) and gpa-3 ( pk35 ) odr-3 ( n1605 ) in 21% O 2 (blue) and 1% O 2 (red) for 24 hours. Three independent experiments were performed with three technical replicates for each strain in each experiment. **, p <0.01; NS = not significant. One way ANOVA with Tukey's test. (F) Lawn occupancy of wild type, gas-1 ( fc21 ) and isp-1 ( qm150 ) mutants in 21% O 2 (blue) or 1% O 2 (red) for 24 hours. Three independent experiments were performed with three technical replicates for each strain in each experiment. ***, p <0.001; NS = not significant. One way ANOVA with Tukey's test. (G) Lawn occupancy of wild type, hif-1 ( ia4 ) and egl-9 ( sa307 ) in 21% O 2 (blue) and 1% O 2 (red) for 24 hours. Three independent experiments were performed with three technical replicates for each strain in each experiment. NS = not significant. One way ANOVA with Tukey's test. (H) Lawn occupancy of wild type gcy-35 ( ok769 ) , tax-4 ( p678 ) and qaIs2241 in 21% O 2 (blue) or 1% O 2 (red) for 24 hours. In the qaIs2241 strain, the O 2 sensing neuron URX, AQR and PQR were genetically ablated. Three independent experiments were performed with three technical replicates for each strain in each experiment. NS = not significant. One way ANOVA with Tukey's test. (I) Lawn occupancy of wild type, egl-3 ( ok979 ) and egl-21 ( n476 ) in 21% O 2 (blue) or 1% O 2 (red) for 24 hours. Three independent experiments were performed with three technical replicates for each strain in each experiment. ****, p <0.0001. One way ANOVA with Tukey's test.

Description

The exposure to hypoxia at high altitude often triggers the inhibition of appetite and causes the loss of body weight (Kayser & Verges, 2021; Kietzmann & Makela, 2021; Quintero, Milagro, Campion, & Martinez, 2010; Westerterp, Kayser, Wouters, Le Trong, & Richalet, 1994). Hypoxia induced anorexia has also been observed in the nematode C. elegans (Figure 1A) (Abergel, Shaked, Shukla, Wu, & Gross, 2021; Gross et al., 2014; Van Voorhies & Ward, 2000). The neuroglobin GLB-5 and the phosphatidylinositol transfer protein PITP-1 have been reported to regulate the recovery from hypoxia evoked food leaving (Abergel et al., 2021; Gross et al., 2014). In this study, we aimed to identify the molecules, which were required for animals to leave the bacterial lawn under hypoxia (Figure 1A). C. elegans displayed an O 2 dependent escaping from the food lawn. The majority of animals left the food after 4 hours in 3% O 2 , whereas 5% O 2 did not effectively trigger food leaving response even though there was a significant reduction of lawn occupancy after 12 or 24 hours in 5% O 2 (Figure 1B). The strongest food leaving response was observed at 1% O 2 (Figure 1B). Intriguingly, the response was less robust at 0.1% O 2 (Figure 1B). Therefore, 1% O 2 was used for the rest of our analysis. We next continuously tracked the food leaving events in 1% O 2 for 4 hours. Animals quickly escaped from the bacterial lawn once they were exposed to 1% O 2 , and nearly all the animals left the food after 2 hours in 1% O 2 (Figure 1C). When animals encountered the bacteria again, they immediately initiated reversals and remained outside the lawn (Extended Data), suggesting that they avoid food under hypoxia.

One plausible mechanism underlying this phenomenon was that bacterial metabolites generated under hypoxia might be aversive to C. elegans . Therefore, we assayed hypoxia induced food leaving using heat-killed bacteria. C. elegans robustly left the dead bacteria at 1% O 2 (Figure 1D), which excluded this possibility. We also noticed that a significant proportion of animals left the dead bacteria after 12 and 24 hours at 21% O 2 (Figure 1D), probably due to poor food qualities. We next sought to probe the potential mechanisms of hypoxia evoked food leaving, and began with the examination if the known O 2 response machineries were involved. C. elegans markedly increased its locomotory speed when O 2 level rapidly dropped to hypoxia (Onukwufor et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2022). dyf-3 , bbs-9 , and gpa-3 odr-3 mutants, which were defective in speed response to hypoxia (Zhao et al., 2022), appeared to exhibit strong food leaving in 1% O 2 (Figure 1E). Similarly, the mitochondrial mutants, gas-1 and isp-1 that were unable to increase their locomotory speed in hypoxia (Zhao et al., 2022), also exhibited robust escaping from the food in 1% O 2 (Figure 1F), with significant but mild defects observed in gas-1 and dyf-3 mutants (Figure 1E and F). These observations suggest distinct mechanisms underlie hypoxia induced food leaving and acute speed response to hypoxia. We subsequently explored if chronic hypoxia response contributed to hypoxia induced food leaving. With sufficient O 2 supply, the proline-4-hydroxylase PHD/ EGL-9 modifies HIF-1 for the degradation, a process that is mediated by the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor protein (Kaelin & Ratcliffe, 2008; Semenza, 2010). The disruption of PHD/ EGL-9 or VHL stabilizes HIF-1 . We found that disrupting hif-1 or egl-9 did not affect the hypoxia induced escaping from bacterial lawn (Figure 1G), suggesting that HIF-1 signaling is not required for this response. The other well described O 2 response mechanism in C. elegans is the sensation of 21% O 2 . This is mediated by the O 2 sensing neurons URX, AQR and PQR, and requires soluble guanylate cyclase GCY-35 and cGMP gated channel TAX-4 (Busch et al., 2012; Cheung, Cohen, Rogers, Albayram, & de Bono, 2005; Couto, Oda, Nikolaev, Soltesz, & de Bono, 2013; Gray et al., 2004; Laurent et al., 2015; Zimmer et al., 2009). However, gcy-35 and tax-4 mutants as well as qaIs2241 strain that lacked O 2 sensing neurons displayed robust food leaving under hypoxia (Figure 1H). Taken together, these observations suggest that animals leave the bacterial food under hypoxia via a distinct O 2 response mechanism.

To gain further insight into hypoxia induced anorexia in C. elegans , we performed a candidate screen for mutants that were defective in this response (Table 1 in Reagents). We discovered that egl-3 and egl-21 mutants were defective in hypoxia induced food leaving (Table 1 in Reagents). Over 60% of both egl-3 and egl-21 mutants remained on the bacterial lawn after 24 hours in 1% O 2 (Figure 1I). egl-3 encodes a pro-peptide convertase required for neuropeptide precursor cleavage (Kass, Jacob, Kim, & Kaplan, 2001), and egl-21 encodes a carboxypeptidase that removes C-terminal basic residues from peptide sequences (Jacob & Kaplan, 2003), suggesting that neuropeptidergic signaling is required for hypoxia induced food avoidance. These observations prompted us to probe which neuropeptide was involved. We assayed 36 strains, in which all neuropeptide genes were disrupted, for their food leaving behavior under hypoxia (Table 1 in Reagents). Surprisingly, we did not recover any strains that were as defective as egl mutants (Table 1 in Reagents), suggesting that multiple neuropeptides might act redundantly to regulate the food leaving under hypoxia.

Methods

C. elegans maintenance

C. elegans strains were maintained under standard conditions (Brenner, 1974). The Bristol N2 were used as wild type. Strains used in this study were listed in Table 1.

Behavioral analysis under hypoxia

To analyze hypoxia induced food leaving events, three biological replicates were performed for each strain, and 3 technical replicates were included in each biological replicate. The assay was performed as the following. 5.5 cm assay plates were seeded with a 1 cm diameter OP50 lawn two days before use. 100 day-one adults were picked to each assay plate and were allowed to settle down for 30 minutes in the room air. The number of animals remained on the bacterial lawn after 30 minutes in 21% O 2 was counted and used as the lawn occupancy of time 0. The assay plates were subsequently exposed to the defined O 2 concentrations (0.1%, 1%, 3%, 5% or 7% O 2 balanced with nitrogen) in the hypoxia chamber (Don Whitley M85 workstation). The temperature in the chamber was set to 21°C, which was close to the room temperature in the lab. A Zeiss Stemi 508 microscope coupled with a Grasshopper camera (FLIR) and a laptop was placed in the hypoxia chamber to capture images and videos. Images were collected after assay plates were transferred to the chamber for 4, 12 and 24 hours. The number of animals on the food lawn could be easily counted in the high-resolution images. The assays were also run in parallel at 21% O 2 , and the lawn occupancy at 21% O 2 at each time point was used as the control. To monitor the dynamic food leaving events, videos were recorded with 2 frames per second for 4 hours. The recording was started immediately when assay plates were placed into the hypoxia chamber. 5 videos of 4 hours were collected at 5 different days. The number of animals on the bacteria lawn were counted every 10 minutes for each video.

To assay hypoxia induced escaping from the dead bacteria, 100 ml of OP50 was grown overnight at 37°C followed by the incubation at 70°C for 4 hours, which efficiently killed the bacteria. The dead bacteria were concentrated, and seeded on the assay plates to generate a 1 cm bacterial lawn. The assay was performed as described above.

In the candidate screen, 30 day-one adult animals were picked to each assay plate, and each strain was assayed 3 times, with one plate per day at 3 different days. The data in Table 1 were the average lawn occupancy of 3 assays.

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing

The yum alleles were all generated using CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing as outlined previously (Dokshin, Ghanta, Piscopo, & Mello, 2018; Ghanta & Mello, 2020). The strategy involved the homology-directed integration of single strand DNA oligo (ssODN). The ssODN templates contained two homology arms of 35 bases flanking the targeted PAM sites. The insertion of ssODN introduced one in-frame and two out-of-frame stop codons as well as a unique restriction enzyme cutting site for genotyping. 16bp coding sequence was simultaneously deleted to generate frameshift. The ribonucleoprotein complexes were assembled by mixing 0.5μl of Cas9 protein (IDT), 5μl of 0.4μg/μl tracrRNA (IDT), and 2.8μl of 0.4μg/μl crRNA (IDT), and incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes. 2.2μl of 1μg/μl ssODN, 2μl of 600μg/μl rol-6 co-injection, and 7.5μl nuclease free water were subsequently added to the final volume of 20μl. The mixture was centrifuged at maximum speed for 5 minutes and loaded into micro-capillary for injection. The F1 roller animals were picked and genotyped for the integration of ssODN. The detailed sequence information of crRNA, ssODN and genotyping primers are available upon request.

Reagents

Strain

Genotype

Source

Lawn occupancy ± SEM (%), 24 hours in 1% O 2

N2

Wild type

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

Ciliogenesis

SP1603

dyf-3 ( m185 ) IV.

CGC

10.00 ± 1.9%

VC1062

bbs-9 ( gk471 ) I.

CGC

4.44 ± 2.9%

PR802

osm-3 ( p802 ) IV.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

VC1228

klp-11 ( tm324 ) IV.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

CB3330

che-11 ( e1810 ) V.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

CB1124

che-3 ( e1124 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

MX124

ifta-1 ( nx61 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

Biogenic amine related

MT15434

tph-1 ( mg280 ) II.

CGC

5.56 ± 2.9%

LC33

bas-1 ( tm351 ) III.

CGC

4.44 ± 2.9%

BZ873

dop-3 ( ok925 ) X.

CGC

3.33 ± 1.9%

MT9455

tbh-1 ( n3247 ) X.

CGC

2.22 ± 1.1%

CB1112

cat-2 ( e1112 ) II.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

LC81

cat-4 ( tm773 ) V.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

LX636

dop-1 ( vs101 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

FG58

dop-4 ( tm1392 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

Channels

PR678

tax-4 ( p678 ) III.

CGC

5.56 ± 2.9%

VC1233

ocr-2 ( ok1711 ) IV.

CGC

4.44 ± 2.2%

RB1556

shw-3 ( ok1884 ) V.

CGC

4.44 ± 4.4%

VC542

kcc-1 ( ok692 ) IV.

CGC

3.33 ± 1.9%

AX1964

cng-1 (db111) V.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

RB1374

ocr-3 ( ok1559 ) X.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

CB1126

che-6 ( e1126 ) IV.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS504

cng-3 ( jh113 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

RB753

lov-1 ( ok522 ) II.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

VC602

trp-2 ( gk298 ) III.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

EJ1158

gon-2 ( q388 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

VC244

gtl-1 ( ok375 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

NM1968

slo-1 ( js379 ) V.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

LY100

slo-2 ( nf100 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

VC1149

kqt-1 ( ok413 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

RB883

kqt-2 ( ok732 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

VC160

trp-1 ( ok323 ) III.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

VC1141

trp-4 ( ok1605 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

Guanylate cyclases

CHS11290

gcy-11 ( tm8150 ) X.

NBRP, Japan

8.89 ± 5.8%

CHS11291

gcy-21 (tm11147) II.

NBRP, Japan

4.44 ± 2.9%

CHS502

gcy-28 (yum32) I.

This study

4.44 ± 2.9%

OH4844

gcy-5 ( tm897 ) II.

CGC

3.33 ± 1.9%

AX1295

gcy-35 ( ok769 ) I.

CGC

2.77 ± 1.4%

CHS11285

gcy-1 ( tm2669 ) II.

NBRP, Japan

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS11289

gcy-9 ( tm7632 ) X.

NBRP, Japan

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS56

npr-1 ( ad609 ) X; gcy-31 (syb852) X; gcy-32 ( ok995 ) V; gcy-33 (syb842) V; gcy-34 ( ok1012 ) V; gcy-35 ( ok769 ) I; gcy-36 ( db42 ) X; gcy-37 ( ok384 ) IV.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

VC2796

gcy-3 ( gk1154 ) II.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS11287

gcy-6 ( tm1449 ) V.

NBRP, Japan

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS11288

gcy-7 ( tm901 ) V.

NBRP, Japan

1.11 ± 1.1%

CX2065

odr-1 ( n1936 ) X.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

RB1935

gcy-20 ( ok2538 ) V.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS11292

gcy-25 ( tm4300 ) IV.

NBRP, Japan

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS11293

gcy-27 (tm11852) IV.

NBRP, Japan

1.11 ± 1.1%

DR47

daf-11 (m47) V.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

VC3024

gcy-2 ( ok3721 ) II.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

CHS11286

gcy-4 ( tm1653 ) II.

NBRP, Japan

0.00 ± 0%

IK597

gcy-23 ( nj37 ) gcy-8 ( oy44 ) gcy-18 ( nj38 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

CHS419

gcy-12 (yum88) II; bbs-9 ( gk471 ) I.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS497

gcy-13 (yum85)V; bbs-9 ( gk471 ) I.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

JN1194

gcy-14 ( pe1102 ) V.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

VC2675

gcy-15 ( gk1102 ) II.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

VC2450

gcy-17 ( gk1155 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

RB1909

gcy-19 ( ok2472 ) II.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

Globins

CHS11299

glb-20 (tm12286) X.

NBRP, Japan

3.33 ± 1.9%

CHS521

glb-27 (yum20) II.

This study

3.33 ± 1.9%

CHS534

glb-32 (yum26) V.

This study

3.33 ± 1.9%

FX05440

glb-5 ( tm5440 ) V.

NBRP, Japan

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS519

glb-9 (yum19) II.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS11300

glb-21 ( tm8033 ) IV.

NBRP, Japan

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS529

glb-22 (yum24) V.

This study

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS515

glb-23 (yum17) IV.

This study

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS517

glb-24 (yum18) V.

This study

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS523

glb-31 (yum21) II.

This study

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS11303

glb-33 ( tm3655 ) V.

NBRP, Japan

2.22 ± 2.2%

CHS506

glb-1 (yum12) III.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS540

glb-3 (yum29) V.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS11294

glb-6 ( tm3795 ) V.

NBRP, Japan

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS541

glb-8 (yum30) I.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS509

glb-11 (yum14) III.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS543

glb-12 (yum31) II.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS11296

glb-16 ( tm5264 ) X.

NBRP, Japan

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS11302

glb-28 ( tm6910 ) X.

NBRP, Japan

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS527

glb-29 (yum23) II.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS508

glb-2 (yum13) IV.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS535

glb-7 (yum27) IV.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS11295

glb-10 ( tm5533 ) II.

NBRP, Japan

0.00 ± 0%

CHS925

glb-13 ( tm2825 ) X.

NBRP, Japan

0.00 ± 0%

CHS513

glb-17 (yum16) X.

NBRP, Japan

0.00 ± 0%

CHS11297

glb-18 ( tm6017 ) I.

NBRP, Japan

0.00 ± 0%

CHS11298

glb-19 ( tm6965 ) IV.

NBRP, Japan

0.00 ± 0%

CHS531

glb-25 (yum25) V.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS11301

glb-26 ( tm4837 ) I.

NBRP, Japan

0.00 ± 0%

CHS538

glb-30 (yum28) III.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

Mitochondria

CW152

gas-1 ( fc21 ) X.

CGC

18.89 ± 8.6%

VC3201

atfs-1 ( gk3094 ) V.

CGC

3.33 ± 1.9%

PH13

rad-8 ( mn163 ) I.

CGC

2.22 ± 1.1%

MQ887

isp-1 ( qm150 ) IV.

CGC

2.22 ± 1.1%

MQ130

clk-1 ( qm30 ) III.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

RB2547

pink-1 ( ok3538 ) II.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

NK2784

trak-1 (qy158[ trak-1 ::mNG + loxP]) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

CZ1998

mcu-1 ( ju1154 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

MQ1333

nuo-6 ( qm200 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

TK22

mev-1 ( kn1 ) III.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

RB2434

asg-2 ( ok3344 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

Neuropeptides

KP2018

egl-21 ( n476 ) IV.

CGC

85.81 ± 3.8%

VC671

egl-3 ( ok979 ) V.

CGC

68.11 ± 1.6%

CHS10032

flp-1 (yum393) IV; flp-23 (yum394) III; flp-14 (yum423) III; flp-25 (yum424) III.

This study

10.00 ± 1.9%

CHS10149

nlp-12 (yum458) I; nlp-39 (yum500) I; capa-1 (yum522) X; nlp-6 (yum537) X.

This study

8.89 ±1.1%

CHS10088

nlp-60 (yum462) IV; nlp-68 (yum463) III; nlp-67 (yum538) X.

This study

8.89 ±1.1%

CHS10025

ins-26 (yum386) I; ins-32 (yum387) II; ins-9 (yum486) X; ins-13 (yum487) II.

This study

7.78 ± 2.2%

CHS10183

nlp-30 (yum420) V; nlp-28 (yum548) V; nlp-29 (yum549) V; nlp-31 (yum550) V.

This study

7.78 ± 1.1%

CHS10011

nlp-19 (yum425) X; nlp-62 (yum426) I; ntc-1 (yum478) X; nlp-64 (yum479) X.

This study

6.67 ± 1.9%

CHS10110

nlp-41 (yum501) II; nlp-45 (yum502) X; nlp-17 (yum528) IV; nlp-77 (yum529) II.

This study

6.67 ± 3.3%

CHS10057

ins-25 (yum388) I; ins-28 (yum389) I; ins-5 (yum409) II; ins-29 (yum410) I; ins-27 (yum455) I.

This study

5.56 ± 2.9%

CHS10009

flp-12 (yum400) X; flp-21 (yum401) V; flp-5 (yum422) X; flp-24 (yum423) III; flp-28 (yum475) X.

This study

5.56 ± 2.2%

CHS10091

nlp-48 (yum467) III; nlp-52 (yum468) III; nlp-40 (yum541) I; nlp-78 (yum542) II.

This study

5.56 ± 1.1%

CHS10073

ins-2 (yum391) II; ins-34 (yum392) IV; ins-12 (yum428) II; ins-15 (yum429) II; ins-11 (yum508) II.

This study

4.44 ± 2.9%

CHS10010

ins-10 (yum413) V; ins-19 (yum414) II; ins-35 (yum476) V; ins-36 (yum477) I.

This study

3.33 ± 1.9%

CHS10118

ins-20 (yum382) II; ins-30 (yum383) I; daf-28 (yum514) V; ins-24 (yum515) I; ins-33 (yum534) I.

This study

3.33 ± 1.9%

CHS10065

nlp-1 (yum551) X; nlp-38 (yum552) I; nlp-3 (yum553) X; nlp-13 (yum554) V.

This study

3.33 ± 1.9%

CHS10093

nlp-34 (yum419) nlp-33 (yum503) nlp-27 (yum504) nlp-25 (yum520) V.

This study

3.33 ± 1.9%

CHS10095

nlp-4 9(yum417) X; nlp-51 (yum418) II; nlp-22 (yum461) X; nlp-46 (yum546) V; nlp-71 (yum547) IV.

This study

3.33 ± 1.9%

CHS10085

flp-10 (yum472) IV; flp-27 (yum473) II; flp-34 (yum395) V; flp-11 (yum509) X.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS10006

flp-7 (yum436) X; flp-9 (yum437) IV; flp-17 (yum405) IV; flp-22 (yum406) I.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS10148

nlp-66 (yum427) X; nlp-11 (yum480) II; nlp-5 4(yum535) IV; nlp-79 (yum536) IV.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS10013

nlp-16 (yum432) IV; nlp-55 (yum433) II; nlp-8 (yum481) I; nlp-61 (yum482) X.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS10092

nlp-23 (yum469) X; nlp-59 (yum470) V; nlp-35 (yum523) IV; pdf-2 (yum524) X.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS10102

nlp-9 (yum415) V; nlp-32 (yum416) III; nlp-26 (yum460) V; nlp-24 (yum543) V.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS10111

nlp-56 (yum459) IV; nlp-57 (yum543) X; nlp-63 (yum544) II; nlp-53 (yum545) X.

This study

2.22 ± 1.1%

CHS10034

flp-3 (yum396) X; flp-6 (yum397) V; flp-13 (yum430) IV; flp-18 (yum431) X.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS10040

nlp-4 (yum451) I; nlp-80 (yum452) V; nlp-18 (yum489) II; nlp-42 (yum490) V.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS10089

nlp-70 (yum464) V; nlp-76 (yum510) X; nlp-36 (yum511) III.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS10109

nlp-21 (yum445) III; nlp-69 (yum446) V; nlp-73 (yum505) V; pdf-1 (yum527) III.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS10046

ins-3 (yum384) II; ins-21 (yum385) III; ins-22 (yum407) III; ins-23 (yum456) III.

This study

1.11 ± 1.1%

CHS10062

ins-17 (yum493) III; ins-18 (yum494) I; ins-16 (yum495) III; ins-37 (yum496) II.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS10081

ins-14 (yum402) II; ins-31 (yum408) II; ins-39 (yum444) X; ins-1 (yum497) IV.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS10080

ins-4 (yum390) II; ins-6 (yum411) II; ins-7 (yum412) IV; ins-8 (yum521) IV.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS10033

flp-4 (yum398) II; flp-15 (yum399) III; flp-2 (yum421) X; flp-16 (yum422) II.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS10063

flp-20 (yum403) X; flp-32 (yum404) X; flp-19 (yum457) X; flp-33 (yum498) I; flp-26 (yum499) X.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS10084

nlp-20 (yum440) IV; nlp-43 (yum441) III; msrp-7 (yum506) II; lury-1 (yum507) III.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS10103

nlp-5 (yum449) II; nlp-10 (yum450) III; nlp-2 (yum488) X; nlp-50 (yum531) II.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

CHS10119

nlp-58 (yum465) V; nlp-15 (yum512) I; nlp-14 (yum513) X; nlp-47 (yum539) IV.

This study

0.00 ± 0%

Others

KP1097

dgk-1 ( nu62 ) X.

CGC

10.00 ± 8.3%

MT1083

egl-8 ( n488 ) V.

CGC

7.78 ± 4.4%

DG1856

goa-1 ( sa734 ) I.

CGC

6.67 ± 1.9%

MT6308

eat-4 ( ky5 ) III.

CGC

5.56 ± 1.1%

KP4

glr-1 ( n2461 ) III.

CGC

4.44 ± 1.1%

NL2105

gpa-3 ( pk35 ) odr-3 ( n1605 ) V.

CGC

4.10 ± 1.3%

CX7102

qaIs2241 [ gcy-36 :: egl-1 ; gcy-35 ::GFP; lin-15 (+)] X.

CGC

3.33 ± 0.9%

VC2393

acy-2 ( ok3003 ) V.

CGC

3.33 ± 1.9%

BS3383

pmk-3 ( ok169 ) IV.

CGC

2.22 ± 1.1%

RB754

aak-2 ( ok524 ) X.

CGC

2.22 ± 2.2%

RB1231

pde-4 ( ok1290 ) II.

CGC

2.22 ± 2.2%

JT307

egl-9 ( sa307 ) V.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

CB1370

daf-2 ( e1370 ) III.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

RB2302

daf-7 ( ok3125 ) III.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

DA609

npr-1 ( ad609 ) X.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

RB1920

mig-10 ( ok2499 ) III.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

BX24

fat-1 ( wa9 ) IV.

CGC

1.11 ± 1.1%

IB16

ceh-17 ( np1 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

GJ7

gpa-2 ( pk16 ) gpa-3 ( pk35 ) gpa-13 ( pk1270 ) V; gpa-5 ( pk376 ) gpa-6 ( pk480 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

MT1073

egl-4 ( n478 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

STE68

nhr-49 ( nr2041 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

IK130

pkc-1 ( nj3 ) V.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

PS3551

hsf-1 ( sy441 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

RB674

stam-1 ( ok406 ) I.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

RB711

pqm-1 ( ok485 ) II.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

JT1058

hid-1 ( sa1058 ) X.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

BX106

fat-6 ( tm331 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

BX30

fat-3 ( wa22 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

KP1182

acy-1 ( nu329 ) III.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

BX26

fat-2 ( wa17 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

BX17

fat-4 ( wa14 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

ZG31

hif-1 ( ia4 ) V.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

GR2245

skn-1 ( mg570 ) IV.

CGC

0.00 ± 0%

Extended Data

Description: A short video clip showing how animals react when they encounter the bacteria in 1% O2. Resource Type: Audiovisual. DOI: 10.22002/aknxd-92g65

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

We thank the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs P40 OD010440) and the National BioResources Project Japan for strains.

Funding

This work was supported by an ERC starting grant (802653 OXYGEN SENSING), a Swedish Research Council VR starting grant (2018-02216), and the Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine.

References

  1. Abergel Z, Shaked M, Shukla V, Wu ZX, Gross E. The phosphatidylinositol transfer protein PITP-1 facilitates fast recovery of eating behavior after hypoxia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J. 2021 Jan 1;35(1):e21202–e21202. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000704R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May 1;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Busch KE, Laurent P, Soltesz Z, Murphy RJ, Faivre O, Hedwig B, Thomas M, Smith HL, de Bono M. Tonic signaling from O₂ sensors sets neural circuit activity and behavioral state. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Mar 4;15(4):581–591. doi: 10.1038/nn.3061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheung BH, Cohen M, Rogers C, Albayram O, de Bono M. Experience-dependent modulation of C. elegans behavior by ambient oxygen. Curr Biol. 2005 May 24;15(10):905–917. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Couto A, Oda S, Nikolaev VO, Soltesz Z, de Bono M. In vivo genetic dissection of O2-evoked cGMP dynamics in a Caenorhabditis elegans gas sensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 12;110(35):E3301–E3310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217428110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dokshin Gregoriy A, Ghanta Krishna S, Piscopo Katherine M, Mello Craig C. Robust Genome Editing with Short Single-Stranded and Long, Partially Single-Stranded DNA Donors in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics. 2018 Sep 13;210(3):781–787. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghanta Krishna S, Mello Craig C. Melting dsDNA Donor Molecules Greatly Improves Precision Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics. 2020 Nov 1;216(3):643–650. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gray JM, Karow DS, Lu H, Chang AJ, Chang JS, Ellis RE, Marletta MA, Bargmann CI. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C. elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. Nature. 2004 Jun 27;430(6997):317–322. doi: 10.1038/nature02714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gross E, Soltesz Z, Oda S, Zelmanovich V, Abergel Z, de Bono M. GLOBIN-5-dependent O2 responses are regulated by PDL-1/PrBP that targets prenylated soluble guanylate cyclases to dendritic endings. J Neurosci. 2014 Dec 10;34(50):16726–16738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5368-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacob TC, Kaplan JM. The EGL-21 carboxypeptidase E facilitates acetylcholine release at Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junctions. J Neurosci. 2003 Mar 15;23(6):2122–2130. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02122.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaelin WG Jr, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008 May 23;30(4):393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kass J, Jacob TC, Kim P, Kaplan JM. The EGL-3 proprotein convertase regulates mechanosensory responses of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 1;21(23):9265–9272. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-23-09265.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kayser B, Verges S. Hypoxia, energy balance, and obesity: An update. Obes Rev. 2021 Jan 20;22 Suppl 2:e13192–e13192. doi: 10.1111/obr.13192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kietzmann T, Mäkelä VH. The hypoxia response and nutritional peptides. Peptides. 2021 Feb 9;138:170507–170507. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2021.170507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laurent P, Soltesz Z, Nelson GM, Chen C, Arellano-Carbajal F, Levy E, de Bono M. Decoding a neural circuit controlling global animal state in C. elegans. Elife. 2015 Mar 11;4 doi: 10.7554/eLife.04241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Onukwufor JO, Farooqi MA, Vodičková A, Koren SA, Baldzizhar A, Berry BJ, Beutner G, Porter GA Jr, Belousov V, Grossfield A, Wojtovich AP. A reversible mitochondrial complex I thiol switch mediates hypoxic avoidance behavior in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 2022 May 3;13(1):2403–2403. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30169-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Quintero P, Milagro FI, Campión J, Martínez JA. Impact of oxygen availability on body weight management. Med Hypotheses. 2009 Nov 12;74(5):901–907. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Semenza GL. Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics. Oncogene. 2009 Nov 30;29(5):625–634. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Voorhies WA, Ward S. Broad oxygen tolerance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol. 2000 Aug 1;203(Pt 16):2467–2478. doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.16.2467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Westerterp KR, Kayser B, Wouters L, Le Trong JL, Richalet JP. Energy balance at high altitude of 6,542 m. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1994 Aug 1;77(2):862–866. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao L, Fenk LA, Nilsson L, Amin-Wetzel NP, Ramirez-Suarez NJ, de Bono M, Chen C. ROS and cGMP signaling modulate persistent escape from hypoxia in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 2022 Jun 21;20(6):e3001684–e3001684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zimmer M, Gray JM, Pokala N, Chang AJ, Karow DS, Marletta MA, Hudson ML, Morton DB, Chronis N, Bargmann CI. Neurons detect increases and decreases in oxygen levels using distinct guanylate cyclases. Neuron. 2009 Mar 26;61(6):865–879. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES