Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1987 Apr;44(4):236–243. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.4.236

Pregnant women's working conditions and their changes during pregnancy: a national study in France.

M J Saurel-Cubizolles, M Kaminski
PMCID: PMC1007814  PMID: 3567097

Abstract

In a study of 2387 employed women who had worked for more than three months of their pregnancy the data were extracted from a survey carried out on a national sample of births in France in 1981. Manual, service and shop workers had a higher preterm delivery rate than professional, administrative, or clerical workers. Assembly line work was associated with a higher preterm delivery rate even when production workers only were considered. Cumulated physically tiring working conditions--standing work, carrying of heavy loads, assembly line work, and considerable physical effort--were related to higher preterm delivery and low birthweight rate. During pregnancy, sickness absences were commoner when the working conditions were arduous. Changes in the working conditions were less clearly related to arduous work than sick leaves; they were not significantly more frequent for standing work or for assembly line work. Refusals from employers to grant favourable arrangements were more frequent when the working conditions were tiring and sick leaves were more common among women whose requests had been refused.

Full text

PDF
236

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chamberlain G., Garcia J. Pregnant women at work. Lancet. 1983 Jan 29;1(8318):228–230. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92599-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fricker H. S., Bruppacher R. Erwerbstätigkeit während der Schwangerschaft und Geburtsgewicht. Soz Praventivmed. 1984;29(2):92–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02077101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Greenough A., Wood S., Morley C. J., Davis J. A. Pancuronium prevents pneumothoraces in ventilated premature babies who actively expire against positive pressure inflation. Lancet. 1984 Jan 7;1(8367):1–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90177-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mamelle N., Laumon B., Lazar P. Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Mar;119(3):309–322. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Papiernik E., Kaminski M. Multifactorial study of the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. I. A study of the frequency of 30 predictive characteristics. J Perinat Med. 1974;2(1):30–36. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1974.2.1.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M., Llado-Arkhipoff J., Du Mazaubrun C., Estryn-Behar M., Berthier C., Mouchet M., Kelfa C. Pregnancy and its outcome among hospital personnel according to occupation and working conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985 Jun;39(2):129–134. doi: 10.1136/jech.39.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M., Rumeau-Rouquette C. Activité professionnelle des femmes enceintes, surveillance prénatale et issue de la grossesse. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1982;11(8):959–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M. Work in pregnancy: its evolving relationship with perinatal outcome (a review). Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(4):431–442. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90048-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES