Abstract
Background
A recently proposed risk factor for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in men is benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The objective was to explore the association of BPH on 1) 90-day complications, 2) length of stay (LOS), 3) readmission rates, and 4) healthcare expenditures following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).
Methods
A retrospective query was performed using a nationwide claims database from January 2005 to March 2014 for male patients undergoing primary TSA. The study cohort included 5067 patients with BPH while 50,720 patients served as the comparison cohort. Logistic regression determined the association of BPH on complications and readmissions. A p value less than 0.001 was significant.
Results
Patients with BPH had higher incidence and odds (36.8 vs. 6.2%; OR: 2.73, p < 0.0001) of all ninety-day medical complications including PJIs (0.49 vs. 0.32%; OR: 1.54, p < 0.001). BPH patients had longer in-hospital LOS (3- vs. 2-days, p < 0.0001). Study group patients had higher 90-day episode of care reimbursements ($13,653 vs. $12,688), p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
BPH is associated with increased complications and healthcare expenditures following total shoulder arthroplasty. The investigation can be used to educate BPH patients of the possible adverse events which may occur within ninety-days following primary TSA for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia, total shoulder arthroplasty, costs, PJI, periprosthetic joint infection, complications
Introduction
Despite increased utilization of total joint arthroplasty, complications in the form of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occur in 1–2% of patients.1,2 Although shoulder PJI occurs less frequently than hip and knee arthroplasties, the morbidity and healthcare costs associated with this complication continue to be primary research efforts by shoulder surgeons.1–9 Male gender has been demonstrated to be a risk for higher rates of periprosthetic joint infections compared to female counterparts after joint replacement of the hip, knee, and shoulder.2,6,10–12 A recently proposed risk factor for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in men is symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).13–15 Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a nonmalignant proliferation of prostatic tissue that results in symptomatic lower urinary tract symptoms in men. 16 The lifetime prevalence of BPH in men was estimated to be about 26%, and influenced by increasing age. 16 Bladder outlet obstruction from BPH predisposes patients to urinary tract infections which hypothetically can seed a nonnative joint due to transient bacteremia. 17 The frequency of patients with BPH undergoing orthopaedic surgery procedures is unknown and further warrants study in this population as prior arthroplasty studies demonstrate somewhat mixed findings.
Yazdi et al. found a significant association of PJI after hip and knee arthroplasty in men with symptomatic BPH, with a nearly 3-fold increase (7.9% versus 2.8% in controls) in infection rate after lower extremity arthroplasty. 15 In contrast, Gu and colleagues found no significant difference of PJIs in patients with BPH following arthroplasty of the hip (1.54% vs 1.43%) and knee (1.99% vs 2.14%). 14 Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the leading causes of failure and reoperation in total shoulder arthroplasty, occurring in approximately 1% of patients. 12 PJIs are projected to cost the healthcare system over $1.85 billion by 2030, therefore efforts to understand the risk factors and increased expenditures in male patients remain paramount. 18 Given that no studies have explored the association of BPH and increased medical complications including PJIs following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), further exploration is highly warranted.
In light of the lack of studies in TSA patients, the objective of this study was to determine the association of BPH on outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty. Specifically, we investigated the impact of BPH on: 1) medical complications, 2) in-hospital length of stay (LOS), 3) readmission rates, and 4) healthcare expenditures. We hypothesized that male patients undergoing TSA with a history of BPH would have increased medical complications, PJIs, and healthcare expenditures compared to their counterparts.
Methods
Database and cohort
A retrospective analysis of the 100% Parts A and B of the Medicare claims database from January 1st, 2005 to March 31st, 2014 was performed using the for-fee based PearlDiver (PearlDiver Technologies, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States) platform. The database contains information of over 100 million patients from the Medicare claims and a private insurance database known as Mariner. The database allows researchers to identify and query cohorts of patients using an open-based syntax language using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), National Drug Codes, and Diagnostic Related Group codes. Information is then extracted as a comma separated value (.csv) spreadsheet for subsequent data analyses. The study was determined to be exempt from our institution’s institutional review board (IRB) review.
The Medicare database was initially queried for all patients who underwent primary TSA using ICD-9 procedural code 81.80. Those patients with a history of glenohumeral OA were identified using ICD-9 diagnostic codes 715.11, 715.21, 715.31, 715.91. Patients with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia were identified using ICD-9 diagnostic code 600.01. These procedural and diagnostic codes were utilized as they have been used in previously published studies.19–21 The “FIRST_INSTANCE” syntax command was utilized to ensure that patients with these procedures and diagnoses were counted for the first time, to prevent any overestimation on the association of BPH on the dependent variables measured within the study. Using Boolean command-syntax language of the PearlDiver database, the inclusion criteria for the study cohort was patients undergoing primary TSA with a concomitant diagnosis of BPH; whereas those patients without BPH served as the comparison cohort. As patients may enter and leave the Medicare database, patients with an active enrollment one year prior and one year following the procedure were included in the analyses. Exclusions from the study included those patients who were female, patients undergoing surgery for trauma, infections, or malignant etiologies as done in prior investigations.
Primary outcomes measured
Primary endpoints of the study were to compare medical complications, in-hospital LOS, readmission rates, and healthcare expenditures. Readmission rates and medical complications were those which occurred within the 90-day episode of care interval. Complications analyzed included: acute kidney injuries, cerebrovascular accidents, deep vein thromboses, ileus episodes, myocardial infarctions, pneumoniae, prosthetic joint infections, pulmonary emboli, respiratory failures, surgical site infections, transfusion of blood products, urinary tract infections, venous thromboemboli. For healthcare expenditures, day of surgery and total global ninety-day episode of care interval costs were analyzed using reimbursement data. Reimbursements were chosen instead of global costs as they are a more accurate predictor of what providers are paid from the insurance companies and has been used as a benchmark in previously published studies from the same database.22,23
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using the open programming language known as R (R, Foundation for Computational Statistics, Vienna, Austria). Baseline demographics of the two cohorts were analyzed using Pearson’s Chi-Square Analyses or Fischer’s Exact test for categorical variables. The PearlDiver database provides age as a categorical variable for patients less than the age of 64, 65 to 69, 70 to 74, 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and older than 85. Other baseline demographics were compared between the two cohorts and included prevalence of comorbid conditions which are found within the Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index (ECI). An overall mean ECI score was also calculated for each cohort. For continuous variables, Welch’s t-tests were used to assess for significance for LOS, healthcare expenditures, and mean ECI scores between the two cohorts. A multivariate binomial logistic regression model was performed to determine the association of BPH on medical complications and readmission rates. The model was adjusted for age, alcohol use disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, general anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity – defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m2), and tobacco use. These comorbid conditions were entered into the regression model as studies have shown BPH to be associated with these comorbid conditions. To reduce the probability of a type I error, a Bonferroni-correction was performed, and a p-value less than 0.001 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Patient population
A total of 133,393 were identified. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final query consisted of 55,787 patients who underwent TSA with (n = 5067) and without (n = 50,720) BPH. The demographics between the two cohorts differed with respect to age (p < 0.0001), and prevalence of comorbid conditions (Table 1). Specifically, study group patients had higher prevalence of all the comorbid conditions analyzed with an exception to morbid obesity (BMI 40 to 70 kg/m2; p = 0.791). Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index (ECI) was greater in the study group compared to control (6 vs 3, p < 0.0001)(Table 1).
Table 1.
Comparison of baseline demographic profiles of patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis With and without benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMI = Body Mass Index; ECI = Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index.
| Benign Prostate Hyperplasia | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | n | % | n | % | p-value |
| Age (Years) | <0.0001 | ||||
| <64 | 348 | 6.87 | 5177 | 10.21 | |
| 65 to 69 | 1638 | 32.33 | 17,032 | 33.58 | |
| 70 to 74 | 1424 | 28.10 | 13,172 | 25.97 | |
| 75 to 79 | 1029 | 20.31 | 9414 | 18.56 | |
| 80 to 84 | 499 | 9.85 | 4610 | 9.09 | |
| ≥ 85 | 129 | 2.55 | 1315 | 2.59 | |
| Comorbidities | |||||
| Alcohol Use Disorder | 364 | 7.18 | 3460 | 6.82 | <0.0001 |
| Arrhythmia | 2539 | 50.11 | 20,151 | 39.73 | <0.0001 |
| BMI 19 to 24 kg/m2 | 80 | 1.58 | 601 | 1.18 | 0.017 |
| BMI 25 to 29 kg/m2 | 216 | 4.26 | 1408 | 2.78 | <0.0001 |
| BMI 30 to 39 kg/m2 | 685 | 13.52 | 5577 | 11.00 | <0.0001 |
| BMI 40 to 70 kg/m2 | 187 | 3.69 | 1915 | 3.78 | 0.791 |
| Congestive Heart Failure | 1436 | 28.34 | 11,000 | 21.69 | <0.0001 |
| Coagulopathy | 935 | 18.45 | 7068 | 13.94 | <0.0001 |
| Depression | 1467 | 28.95 | 11,071 | 21.83 | <0.0001 |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 1958 | 38.64 | 17,891 | 35.27 | <0.0001 |
| Hypertension | 4650 | 91.77 | 44,089 | 86.93 | <0.0001 |
| Hypothyroidism | 1248 | 24.63 | 9942 | 19.60 | <0.0001 |
| Iron Deficiency Anemia | 2671 | 52.71 | 19,818 | 39.07 | <0.0001 |
| Liver Failure | 421 | 8.31 | 3292 | 6.49 | <0.0001 |
| Peptic Ulcer Disease | 560 | 11.05 | 4202 | 8.28 | <0.0001 |
| Peripheral Vascular Disease | 1878 | 37.06 | 13,698 | 27.01 | <0.0001 |
| Renal Failure | 376 | 7.42 | 2504 | 4.94 | <0.0001 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis | 829 | 16.36 | 5756 | 11.35 | <0.0001 |
| Valvular Disorders | 1562 | 30.83 | 11,504 | 22.68 | <0.0001 |
| Pathologic Weight Loss | 351 | 6.93 | 2802 | <0.0001 | |
| ECI | 6 | 3 | <0.0001 | ||
Ninety-Day medical complications
Patients with BPH were found to have significantly higher frequency and odds of developing adverse events within ninety-days following their surgical procedure (36.8 vs. 6.2%; OR: 2.73, 95%CI: 2.49 to 2.98, p < 0.0001). Study group patients were found to have higher rates of urinary tract infections (7.12 vs. 1.78%; OR: 4.03, 95%CI: 3.55 to 4.58, p < 0.0001), pneumoniae (3.00 vs. 1.21%; OR: 2.37, 95%CI: 1.97 to 2.84, p < 0.0001), acute renal failure (2.92 vs. 1.18%; OR: 2.33, 95%CI: 1.93 to 2.80, p < 0.0001), and PJI (0.49 vs. 0.32%; OR: 1.54, 95%CI: 1.01 to 2.36, p < 0.001), in addition to other adverse events (Table 2).
Table 2.
Comparison on the frequency of ninety-Day medical complications among study group and control cohorts undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
| BPH | Control | OR | 95%CI | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urinary Tract Infection | 7.12 | 1.78 | 4.03 | 3.55 – 4.58 | <0.0001 |
| Pneumoniae | 3.00 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 1.97 – 2.84 | <0.0001 |
| Ileus | 0.55 | 0.22 | 2.34 | 1.51 – 3.51 | <0.0001 |
| Acute Renal Failure | 2.92 | 1.18 | 2.33 | 1.93 – 2.80 | <0.0001 |
| Transfusions | 1.89 | 0.04 | 2.25 | 1.38 – 3.53 | 0.0006 |
| Myocardial Infarctions | 0.73 | 0.30 | 2.17 | 1.49 – 3.09 | <0.0001 |
| Respiratory Failure | 0.26 | 0.12 | 2.02 | 1.06 – 3.58 | 0.02 |
| Deep Vein Thromboses | 6.61 | 0.12 | 1.71 | 1.28 – 2.25 | 0.0001 |
| Venous Thromboemboli | 8.31 | 0.14 | 1.62 | 1.24 – 2.08 | 0.0001 |
| Cerebrovascular Accidents | 1.11 | 0.64 | 1.58 | 1.14 – 2.03 | <0.0001 |
| PJIs | 0.49 | 0.32 | 1.54 | 1.01 – 2.36 | <0.001 |
| Surgical Site Infections | 0.280 | 0.08 | 3.60 | 1.95 – 6.63 | 0.0001 |
| Pulmonary Emboli | 3.51 | 0.05 | 1.27 | 0.80 – 1.91 | 0.268 |
| Total | 36.78 | 6.20 | 2.73 | 2.49 – 2.98 | <0.0001 |
BPH = Benign Prostate Hyperplasia; PJIs = Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infections; OR = Odds-Ratio; 95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval.
* = Adjusted for Age, Geographic Region, Alcohol Use Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, General Anxiety Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, Obesity, and Tobacco Use.
In-Hospital LOS and readmission rates
Patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty with BPH were found to have longer in-hospital LOS (3-days vs. 2-days, p < 0.0001) compared to controls. Additionally, study group patients were found to have similar incidence and odds of readmission rates within 90 days of surgery (6.49% vs. 6.43%, OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.09, p = 0.587) compared to the control population.
Healthcare expenditures
When assessing healthcare expenditures, BPH patients were found to have significantly higher day of surgery ($11,664.55 vs. $11,135.75, p < 0.0001) and total global 90-day episode of care reimbursement rates $13,652.71 vs. $12,688.37, p < 0.0001) compared to the control cohort following TSA.
Discussion
Shoulder arthroplasty procedures have exponentially increased over the last few decades, with the proposed revision burden following a similar trajectory.24–29 Despite an abundance of literature detailing the risk factors for complication following TSA,6,30–37 no studies to date have explored the association of BPH history on postoperative outcomes. To address a gap in the existing literature, we attempted to determine the associated comorbidities in patients with BPH undergoing TSA and the rates of postoperative complications in comparison to controls. Using a nationwide database, this study found that patients undergoing TSA with a history of BPH have a higher comorbidity burden (ECI 6 vs ECI 3), significantly higher 90 day medical complications (including PJIs), longer lengths of stay, and increased healthcare associated costs.
Perhaps the most clinically important finding of our study was the increased rate of medical complications including PJIs in patients with a history of BPH within 90 days of surgery. Gender, specifically male patients undergoing arthroplasty, has been reported to be a increased risk for PJI compared to females. It is postulated that sex hormones may modulate and interact with the immune system differently between genders, however more study is needed to confirm these findings.38,39 Groups have proposed that underlying BPH may be a potential contributor due to a higher systemic bioburden from postop urinary retention, catheterization, and UTIs.14,15 Yazdi et al. demonstrated in all total joint arthroplasties of the hip and knee, BPH was associated with a nearly 3-fold increase in PJI rate (7.9% versus 2.8% in controls). 15 In the present study, we noted a increase in 90-day PJI rate (0.49% vs 0.32%) for patients with a history of BPH. The 90-day PJI rates of the BPH cohort in our study (0.49%) were midway between 90-day (0.23%) and 1 year (0.75%) rates of all TSA patients in another study. 40 Because of the economic and morbidity ramifications of PJI, optimization of perioperative voiding dynamics has recently become an area of study in the lower extremity arthroplasty population. Moverman et al. performed a break-even economic model to determine the viability of routine voiding optimization in BPH patients undergoing lower extremity TJA. 13 They found that medical intervention was economically justified whereas surgical intervention was less recommended. Surgical intervention was only a consideration when factoring in the long-term costs of PJI. Because this area of study has not been undertaken in upper extremity arthroplasty, further economic analyses should be performed to understand the cost benefit of urinary optimization in preventing postoperative complications in TSA patients with BPH. Moving forward, it is imperative to understand the reason for higher rates of PJI in patients with symptomatic BPH. Longer term prospective studies should be done to understand the underlying cause and incidence of PJI in male patients undergoing TSA.
This present study found that patients with BPH had longer in-hospital LOS (3-days vs. 2-days, p < 0.0001) with similar rates of 90-day readmissions (6.49% vs. 6.43%) compared to the control population. Further, long term prospective studies are needed to understand the influence of BPH history on shoulder arthroplasty reoperation, readmission, and LOS. One facet that has not been evaluated is the healthcare associated costs in patients with a history of BPH undergoing joint arthroplasty. The healthcare expenditures in the current study reflect an increase in patients with a history of BPH both on the day of surgery, and within the 90-day episode of care interval. Understanding where insurance and payer reimbursements are being allocated from a surgeon and hospital standpoint remain complex issues. Casp et al. reported trends and variation in hospital charges and payments compared with surgeon charges and payments for TSA in Medicare patients. 22 They found that hospital institutions were reimbursed at disproportionately higher rates relative to surgeons despite stable patient complexity and a decreasing LOS. These findings are important in the context of our study as upper extremity arthroplasty surgeons aim to provide quality and cost effective care while minimizing patient and financial risks.
There are some limitations to this retrospective study. The study relies on accurate coding for proper patient identification and procedural and diagnostic coding, however a presumed small amount of coding errors occur with the use of administrative databases. Patient charts cannot be directly reviewed for verification, thus the scope of the investigation is limited to information captured in billing codes. Additionally, analysis of this study was done using a single insurance database and the results may not be generalizable and a true representation of the association of BPH following total shoulder arthroplasty. Since the database does not track patients based on insurance plan but instead on provider network, longitudinal followup may be missed. Furthermore, there may be an underestimation of patients with symptomatic BPH due to a lack of clinical diagnosis, therefore influencing the strength of association of BPH on the dependent variables of interest Patients with BPH were shown to have an increased comorbidity burden, therefore the increased complications in the study group is subject to potential confounding. Despite controlling for the common comorbidities that are associated with BPH within the logistic regression model, it is possible the increased complication rate is explained by other factors. Lastly, there is a lack of information regarding postoperative catheterization, which may influence the results seen in the study. Chronic intermittent catheterization and indwelling urinary catheterization have been demonstrated to be a risk factor for PJI, and to what extent this plays a role in postoperative complications as it relates to BPH is an area of further research. There are other factors that potentially impact readmission and complication rates after total shoulder arthroplasty that are unable to be characterized within the database, including operative time, surgical approach, hospital volume, and anesthetic technique. Some of the medications (5-alpha reductase inhibitors −5ARIs) used as long term treatment for BPH have been hypothesized to be associated with an increased risk of VTE and could confound some of the results seen in our study. Furthermore, while the large sample size is an advantage to the study, a formal power analysis was not done due to the retrospective nature of the study. Despite these limitations, this is the first study to use a large patient population to analyze the association between BPH on multiple outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty.
Conclusion
Patients with an BPH are at a significant risk for medical complications, PJIs, and healthcare expenditures following TSA within 90 days of surgery. In-hospital LOS was significantly longer in BPH patients, despite 90-day readmission rates similar to controls. The current investigation can be used by healthcare professionals to educate patients who have BPH on the potential outcomes following their TSA procedure. Future investigations should stratify the severity of BPH on postoperative outcomes following these orthopaedic procedures to identify at which threshold is it safe and cost effective to undergo primary TSA for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Furthermore, longer term follow-up is also recommended as this would allow to identify additional adverse events which may have been overlooked as in this investigation.
Footnotes
Informed consent was not sought for the present study because this study utilized deidentified nationwide data.
Ethical approval for this study was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Maimonides Medical Center
AMG wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AH, AL, BS edited first draft. RS, JC oversaw study. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iD: Adam M. Gordon https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-0172
References
- 1.Paxton ES, Green A, Krueger VS. Periprosthetic infections of the shoulder: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27: E935–E944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Ramsey MLet al. et al. Periprosthetic shoulder infection in the United States: incidence and economic burden. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 741–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Contreras ES, Frantz TL, Bishop JYet al. et al. Periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2020; 13: 757–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cooper ME, Trivedi NN, Sivasundaram Let al. et al. Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2019; 7: e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garrigues GE, Zmistowski B, Cooper AM, et al. Proceedings from the 2018 international consensus meeting on orthopedic infections: the definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: S8–S12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR, Blom AWet al. et al. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0150866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Manning L, Metcalf S, Clark B, et al. Clinical characteristics, etiology, and initial management strategy of newly diagnosed periprosthetic joint infection: a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of 783 patients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020; 7: ofaa068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Patel VV, Ernst SMC, Rangarajan Ret al. et al. Validation of new shoulder periprosthetic joint infection criteria. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30: S71–S76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Simha S, Shields EJW, Wiater JM. Periprosthetic infections of the shoulder. JBJS Rev 2018; 6: e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Okoroha KR, Muh S, Gabbard M, et al. Early outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty according to sex. JSES Open Access 2019; 3: 43–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kapadia BH, Berg RA, Daley JAet al. et al. Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet 2016; 387: 386–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Richards J, Inacio MCS, Beckett M, et al. Patient and procedure-specific risk factors for deep infection after primary shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 2809–2815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moverman MA, Bruha MJ, Pagani NRet al. et al. Perioperative medical optimization of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia is an economically justified infection prevention strategy in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36: 2551–2557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gu A, Agarwal A, Fassihi SCet al. et al. Does symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2021; 36: 897–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yazdi H, Restrepo C, Foltz C, et al. Symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection in male patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102: 543–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee SWH, Chan EMC, Lai YK. The global burden of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 7984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mohee AR, Gascoyne-Binzi D, West Ret al. et al. Bacteraemia during transurethral resection of the prostate: what are the risk factors and is it more common than we think? PLoS One 2016; 11: e0157864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Premkumar A, Kolin DA, Farley KX, et al. Projected economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36: 1484–1489.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Casp AJ, Montgomery SR, Cancienne JMet al. et al. Osteoporosis and implant-related complications after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28: 121–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Deasey MJ, Bell JE, Chen Met al. et al. A comparison of perioperative pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty: preoperative tramadol is associated with decreased long-term opiate use when compared with traditional opioids. Semin Arthroplasty 2021; 31: 105–111. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ode GE, Odum S, Connor PMet al. et al. Ambulatory versus inpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of trends, outcomes, and charges. JSES Int 2020; 4: 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Casp AJ, Smith JM, Brockmeier SFet al. et al. Surgeon charges and reimbursements are declining compared with hospital payments for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29: 924–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Gulotta L Vet al. et al. Ambulatory total shoulder arthroplasty: a comprehensive analysis of current trends, complications, readmissions, and costs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 629–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Day JS, Lau E, Ong KLet al. et al. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 1115–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Yet al. et al. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 2249–2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the u.s., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100: 1455–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wagner ER, Farley KX, Higgins Iet al. et al. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29: 2601–2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Farley KX, Wilson JM, Daly CAet al. et al. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared to hip and knee arthroplasty. JSES Open Access 2019; 3: 44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Farley KX, Wilson JM, Kumar A, et al. Prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States and the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. JBJS Open Access 2021; 6: e20.00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wright-Chisem J, Apostolakos JM, Dines JS, et al. The impact of prior ipsilateral arthroscopy on infection rates after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30: 1596–1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smith JM, Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SFet al. et al. Vitamin D deficiency and total shoulder arthroplasty complications. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13: 99–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Werner BC, Burrus MT, Begho Iet al. et al. Early revision within 1 year after shoulder arthroplasty: patient factors and etiology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: e323–e330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Carr JCet al. et al. Implant removal and spacer placement for infected shoulder arthroplasty: risk factors for repeat procedures, spacer retention, and mortality. HSS J 2018; 14: 228–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Werner BC. Association of perioperative glycemic control with deep postoperative infection after shoulder arthroplasty in patients with diabetes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26: e238–e245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Werner BC, Cancienne JM, Burrus MTet al. et al. The timing of elective shoulder surgery after shoulder injection affects postoperative infection risk in medicare patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 390–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Werner BC, Burrus MT, Browne JAet al. et al. Superobesity (body mass index >50 kg/m2) and complications after total shoulder arthroplasty: an incremental effect of increasing body mass index. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 1868–1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Aibinder W, Schoch B, Parsons M, et al. Risk factors for complications and revision surgery after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30: e689–e701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gubbels Bupp MR, Potluri T, Fink ALet al. et al. The confluence of sex hormones and aging on immunity. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2016; 16: 626–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wickman JR, Goltz DE, Levin JMet al. et al. Early aseptic reoperation after shoulder arthroplasty increases risk of subsequent prosthetic joint infection. JSES Int 2021; 5: 1067–1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
