Correction: EJNMMI Physics (2023) 10:9 10.1186/s40658-023-00531-0
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in Fig. 1. The correct figure is given below.
Fig. 1.
DL models. The number under the blocks presents the patch size (upper number) and number of filters (lower number). Noisy 32 × 32 × 32 patches cropped from reduced acquisition time OSEM images were used as model input and model gave denoised 32 × 32 × 32 patches as output. Output patches were later combined using weighted averaging to produce images at the original reconstruction matrix size
The original article [1] has been updated.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
- 1.Sohlberg A, Kangasmaa T, Constable C, et al. Comparison of deep learning-based denoising methods in cardiac SPECT. EJNMMI Phys. 2023 doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00531-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

