Abstract
Since the Bhopal disaster, in which the causal agent was methyl isocyanate (MIC), exposed people have complained of various disorders including neuromuscular dysfunction. In an attempt to gain some information about the response of muscle tissue to MIC its effects were investigated in cells in culture isolated from muscle of 2 day old rats. After treatment with a range of MIC concentrations (0.025-0.5 microliter/5 ml culture) the total number of nuclei of the two main cell types (fibroblasts and myoblasts) and the number of nuclei in muscle fibres (myotubes) were recorded. At lower doses which had little effect on the total number of nuclei, the formation of muscle fibres--that is, fusion of muscle cells--was prevented as the proportion of nuclei in myotubes was decreased. At higher doses both cell types were killed. This would suggest either an effect on muscle differentiation or a selective toxicity towards myoblasts. The observations were supported by light and electron microscopy.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson D., Blowers S. D., Nemery B. Investigation by the Ames test of urine samples from rats exposed to methyl isocyanate. Br J Ind Med. 1986 Aug;43(8):566–567. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.8.566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KIMMERLE G., EBEN A. ZUR TOXICITAET VON METHYLISOCYANAT UND DESSEN QUANTITATIVER BESTIMMUNG IN DER LUFT. Arch Toxikol. 1964 May 27;20:235–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nemery B., Dinsdale D., Sparrow S., Ray D. E. Effects of methyl isocyanate on the respiratory tract of rats. Br J Ind Med. 1985 Dec;42(12):799–805. doi: 10.1136/oem.42.12.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nemery B., Sparrow S., Dinsdale D. Methyl isocyanate: thiosulphate does not protect. Lancet. 1985 Nov 30;2(8466):1245–1246. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90775-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaidi S. H. Bhopal and after. Am J Ind Med. 1986;9(3):215–216. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700090302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]