Abstract
The development of an effective and durable vaccine remains a central goal in the fight against malaria. Circumsporozoite protein (CSP) is the major surface protein of sporozoites and the target of the only licensed Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01. However, vaccine efficacy is low and short-lived, highlighting the need for a second-generation vaccine with superior efficacy and durability. Here, we report a Helicobacter pylori apoferritin-based nanoparticle immunogen that elicits strong B cell responses against PfCSP epitopes that are targeted by the most potent human monoclonal antibodies. Glycan engineering of the scaffold and fusion of an exogenous T cell epitope enhanced the anti-PfCSP B cell response eliciting strong, long-lived and protective humoral immunity in mice. Our study highlights the power of rational vaccine design to generate a highly efficacious second-generation anti-infective malaria vaccine candidate and provides the basis for its further development.
Subject terms: Malaria, Protein vaccines
Introduction
Malaria caused by the unicellular parasite Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) remains a major health problem particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, which carries nearly 95% of the global disease burden1. The only available malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01 (Mosquirix, GSK Biologicals, short RTS,S), targets the pre-erythrocytic sporozoite stage of the parasite that is transmitted to humans by the bite of infected Anopheles mosquitoes. RTS,S has been developed more than 30 years ago with the aim to prevent the infection through the induction of antibody responses against Pf circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP) that densely coats the surface of sporozoites and is essential for parasite development2–5. PfCSP contains three domains: the N-terminal domain (N-CSP), the central repeat domain and the C-terminal domain (C-CSP), which anchors the protein to the cell membrane through a GPI-linker6,7. To induce protective humoral immunity, RTS,S includes part of the PfCSP central repeat domain comprising 18 repeating motifs composed of asparagine, alanine, asparagine and proline (NANP)8,9 that are known targets of potent antibodies and highly conserved across Pf isolates10. In contrast, the vast majority of reported PfCSP T cell epitopes are located in the polymorphic C-CSP11–18. To provide T cell help, RTS,S contains the complete C-CSP of the Pf laboratory strain NF548. Immunogenicity is further boosted through genetic fusion with the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and complexing of the recombinant fusion protein with free HBsAg (S) for self-assembly into virus-like particles.
Vaccination with RTS,S in a monophosphoryl lipid A and saponin containing adjuvant system (AS01), induces strong humoral anti-NANP responses in humans. However, a large phase III field trial and recent implementation studies have shown that its efficacy is overall limited and protection is relatively short-lived19, which might be related to a drop in anti-PfCSP-reactive IgG and IgM antibodies at around 6 months after vaccination20. However, the exact reasons for this remain elusive and it remains to be determined whether the Matrix M saponin-adjuvanted R21, an evolved immunogen version that lacks free HBsAg and, therefore, has an increased proportion of PfCSP components compared to RTS,S, will provide better efficacy and longevity in phase III trials21–23. To instruct the design of a second-generation PfCSP vaccine, recent studies have dissected the human anti-PfCSP antibody response at monoclonal level10,24–31. The work aimed at defining the target epitopes of the most potent anti-PfCSP antibodies beyond the NANP repeats and to characterize the molecular and cellular mechanisms that drive the induction of protective humoral anti-PfCSP immunity. To date no potent antibody targeting the N-CSP or C-CSP could be identified, suggesting that these regions are poor vaccine targets25,29,32,33. In contrast, several additional target epitopes of potent antibodies were discovered in the junction that links the N-CSP and the NANP central repeats by a short stretch of a few alternating NANP and NANP-like NPDP and NVDP motifs (junction) that is absent from RTS,S26,30,31,34. Due to the high degree of similarity between these minor motifs in the junction and the NANP repeats, most anti-junction antibodies show cross-reactivity with the NANP-repeat motifs26,30,31. Cross-reactivity was linked to antibody binding strength and parasite inhibition suggesting that inclusion of the junction might promote the induction of potent humoral anti-parasite responses.
Here, we integrated our combined molecular and cellular understanding of anti-PfCSP antibodies and B cell affinity maturation to design a PfCSP-based immunogen that induced strong long-lasting parasite-inhibitory serum-antibody responses and protection in mice, laying the foundational basis for its further development.
Results
Antibody responses against the NANP repeats but not the immunodominant C-CSP show parasite-inhibitory activity
To determine whether the C-CSP induces protective humoral immune responses and may play an important role in vaccine design beyond inducing T cell help, we directly compared the protective properties of antibodies targeting the different PfCSP domains. Repeated immunization of C57BL/6J wild type (wt) mice with a recombinant full-length PfCSP (FL-PfCSP) adjuvanted with SAS, an oil-in-water adjuvant system containing MPL in combination with trehalose dicorynomycolate (TDM)35, induced anti-PfCSP IgG responses dominated by antibodies against the C-CSP compared to NANP repeats, whereas antibodies against the N-CSP were barely detectable (Fig. 1a). Thus, in contrast to the known immunodominance of the NANP repeat region in anti-PfCSP antibody responses induced by sporozoites24,34,36,37, the C-CSP is highly immunodominant in recombinant soluble FL-PfCSP.
Given the overall low immunogenicity and lack of evidence of potent antibody epitopes in the N-CSP25, we focused our further analyses on the NANP repeats and C-CSP. To dissect the relative contribution of antibodies against NANP repeats and C-CSP to parasite inhibition, we depleted the immune sera of NANP-reactive antibodies by affinity purification and compared serum-antibody binding to live Pf sporozoites before and after the depletion by flow cytometry (Fig. 1b, c). Only sera containing NANP-reactive IgG antibodies showed sporozoite binding to Pf sporozoites, suggesting that the C-CSP-reactive antibodies failed to access their target epitopes on the surface of live sporozoites (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1). In line with the lack of sporozoite binding, NANP-antibody depletion also strongly reduced sera potency to inhibit Pf sporozoite traversal of hepatocytes in vitro (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 2). Thus, despite the high immunogenicity of the C-CSP and strong reactivity of the antibodies with recombinant PfCSP, this component of the response lacked direct functional relevance. Instead, the parasite inhibitory activity of humoral immune responses against PfCSP was linked primarily to antibodies against the central repeat region.
Helicobacter pylori apoferritin-based PfCSP nanocage immunogens induce strong parasite-inhibitory antibody responses
To avoid the induction of strong antibody responses against the C-CSP, we focused our immunogen design on the NANP repeat and the junction, the target epitopes of high-affinity, cross-reactive and protective antibodies10,24,26,28,30,31. Furthermore, we limited the number of repeating NANP motifs to five per PfCSP peptide to avoid the potential activation of low-affinity B cells by strong BCR cross-linking34,38–40. To compensate for the lack of PfCSP-derived T cell epitopes in the absence of the C-CSP and to promote affinity maturation, we used a universal pan DR T helper cell epitope PADRE known to induce a strong response in humans and mice41. The PfCSP and PADRE sequences were genetically fused to the N- and C-terminus, respectively, of H. pylori apoferritin, a self-assembling protein that oligomerizes into spherical nanocages with 24 subunits (Fig. 2a). N-terminal fusion of the PfCSP peptides enabled their display on the particle surface to mediate efficient B cell activation, whereas the C-terminal PADRE peptides were encapsulated inside the nanocage, thereby avoiding the induction of humoral immune responses against these T cell epitopes. This nanoparticle, referred to as immunogen 126, assembled into monodisperse, well-formed spherical particles (Fig. 2b, c), and bound strongly to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) reactive to the junction and NANP repeats, but not N- or C-CSP (Supplementary Fig. 4a).
Immunization of wt mice with immunogen 126 adjuvanted with SAS induced a long-lasting and significantly stronger antibody response against the junction and NANP repeats compared to immunization with the FL-PfCSP monomer (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 5). Similar results were obtained in mice of the Kymouse™ platform transgenic for the entire human variable gene repertoire42 (Fig. 2e). Ig gene sequencing of PfCSP-reactive B cells from these transgenic mice immunized with immunogen 126 adjuvanted with SAS showed that the response was dominated by VH3-33 antibodies paired with VK1-5 light chains, a combination associated with high anti-PfCSP antibody reactivity in humans24 (Fig. 2f, Supplementary Fig. 6). The vast majority of VH3-33 antibodies carried somatic mutations and showed clear signs of affinity maturation based on the selection of somatic hypermutations previously shown to increase PfCSP affinity (H.31, H.50)24,43 (Fig. 2g), demonstrating the efficiency of the employed immunogen design strategy.
The potency of immunogen 126 was also reflected by the parasite inhibitory activity of the elicited humoral immune response. Sera from mice of the Kymouse™ platform immunized with immunogen 126 were significantly more efficient at blocking Pf sporozoite traversal of hepatocytes than sera from FL-PfCSP immunized animals with overall lower titers and lack of junction-reactive antibody responses (Fig. 2h). In summary, immunization with the newly designed nanoparticle immunogen 126 induced high and stable antibody responses against the protective PfCSP epitopes in the junction and NANP repeats that showed clear signs of efficient affinity maturation and mediated strong parasite inhibitory activity.
Glycan engineering of the nanocage scaffold focuses and enhances the humoral response against PfCSP epitopes
The apoferritin nanocage scaffold is known to induce strong humoral immune responses44,45. To suppress the anti-particle response through glycan shielding, we engineered a modified immunogen (immunogen 145) by introducing two non-native glycosylation sites at position N79 and N99 of each apoferritin monomer. Expression of immunogen 145 in mammalian HEK293S cells [GnT I−/−] produced particles with homogeneous high mannose N-linked glycans at these positions (referred to as immunogen 145S, Fig. 3a). Similar to immunogen 126, 145S assembled into monodisperse, well-formed spherical particles (Fig. 3b, c), and bound strongly to mAbs reactive to the junction and NANP repeats, but not N- or C-CSP (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Immunization in wt mice with the glycosylated nanoparticle 145S adjuvanted with SAS lowered the anti-carrier response significantly compared to the parental immunogen 126 (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b), while the desired antibody response against the PfCSP epitopes in the junction and NANP repeats was strongly increased (Supplementary Fig. 7c, d). Similar results were observed with the adjuvant LMQ, a liposome-based adjuvant containing the saponin QS-21 and a synthetic TLR4 agonist46 resembling AS01 (Fig. 3d–g). Importantly, adjuvanting the glycan-engineered immunogen with LMQ induced high anti-PfCSP antibody responses after two immunizations (Supplementary Fig. 8).
The superior properties of the glycan-engineered immunogen 145S compared to the parental non-glycosylated immunogen 126 were also observed at the cellular level (Fig. 3h, i). Flow cytometric analyses showed significantly stronger anti-PfCSP B cell responses in draining lymph nodes after immunization with immunogen 145S compared to immunogen 126 (Fig. 3h, Supplementary Fig. 9). ELISpot analyses demonstrated that both immunogens induced the formation of PfCSP-reactive bone marrow (BM) plasma cells at high (10 µg) and at low (0.5 µg) immunization dose (Fig. 3i). Similar to the response in the periphery, the frequency of PfCSP-reactive BM plasma cells was significantly higher in mice immunized with immunogen 145S compared to immunogen 126, whereas H. pylori apoferritin-reactive BM plasma cells were much less abundant even after low-dose vaccination. Furthermore, sera from mice immunized with 145S had a higher capacity to inhibit Pf sporozoite traversal of hepatocytes in vitro than sera from mice immunized with immunogen 126 at both immunogen doses tested (Fig. 3j). We conclude that the engineering of N-linked glycosylation sites boosted the response against the protective PfCSP epitopes and efficiently shielded the nanocage carrier protein from the humoral immune response.
Induction of strong T cell responses
The induction of strong T helper cell responses is of great importance for the development of high-quality affinity matured and durable humoral immunity. To evaluate T cell responses induced by immunogen 145S, we determined the frequency of CD44highCD62Lneg effector memory (EM) and CXCR5posPD-1pos T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in mice immunized with immunogen 145S compared to adjuvant alone (Fig. 4a, b, Supplementary Fig. 10) and quantified the frequency of antigen-reactive T cells of different T cell populations using a PADRE-tetramer (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 10). Prime-boost immunization with immunogen 145S adjuvanted with LMQ induced strong EM and Tfh cells responses with high proportion of PADRE-reactive cells that mostly showed an activated (CD44+) phenotype (Fig. 4a–c). The frequency of antigen-specific cells was highest among Tfh cells (Fig. 4c) that also showed the strongest proliferative response upon PADRE restimulation ex vivo (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. 11). The high potency of the PADRE T cell epitope was reflected by the extremely low peptide concentration of about 2 nM that was sufficient to induce proliferation (Fig. 4e). Of note, PADRE did not induce humoral responses much above background (Supplementary Fig. 12). Together, these data demonstrated the potency of the immunogen-encapsulated PADRE epitopes at inducing strong T helper cell responses and T cell memory.
Long-lived protective immunity
Next, we examined whether immunization with immunogen 145S would induce strong and durable antibody responses and protection against Plasmodium infection. Mice were immunized with formulations of 0.5 or 10 µg of immunogen 145S adjuvanted with LMQ following a prime-boost scheme. Robust antibody responses against the junction and NANP repeats were elicited at both doses (Fig. 5a). Although higher peak IgG levels were observed in the 10 µg group, the titers reached similar levels by day 50 after primary immunization and remained stable over 141 days (Fig. 5a, b). Independent of the immunogen dose, sera of the immunized mice efficiently blocked Pf sporozoite traversal of hepatocytes in vitro even 5 months after immunization (Fig. 5c). Immunized mice were exposed to the bites of mosquitoes infected with P. berghei transgenic mCherry reporter sporozoites expressing PfCSP instead of the endogenous P. berghei CSP, (PbPfCSP(mCherry) Supplementary Figs. 13, 14a–c) and the development of blood stage parasitaemia was measured by flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. 14d). Challenge of the immunized mice under stringently controlled conditions with bites from three mosquitoes infected with PbPfCSP(mCherry) sporozoites 23 days after the booster immunization (day 51) showed sterile protection in all mice from the development of blood stage parasitemia (Fig. 5d). Importantly, a high level of protection was also observed when the immunized animals were challenged 5 months after immunization (day 142, Fig. 5e), where 4 mice and 3 mice out of 5 were protected after immunization with 10 and 0.5 ug, respectively. Thus, two immunizations of mice with immunogen 145S induced highly efficacious and durable immune responses against Plasmodium infections over a 20-fold dose range.
Discussion
Here, we describe the design and engineering of a second-generation anti-infective malaria vaccine candidate following a reverse vaccinology 2.047 approach guided by the molecular and cellular analysis of human anti-PfCSP antibody responses10,24–32,34. Our immunogens elicited strong, durable and protective humoral immunity against the most potent PfCSP epitopes in the junction and the repeat. The potency of antibodies against these target sites was associated with cross-reactivity to junction and repeat motifs26. Although B cells with NANP specificity dominated the immediate response to PfCSP on sporozoites in humans, cross-reactive antibodies were continuously selected due to their overall higher affinity24,26. GCs are essential mediators of affinity maturation and were efficiently induced by our immunogens, which were designed to improve the quality and the quantity of the humoral response. The high quality of the antibody response was also confirmed in the Kymouse™ model, where the selection of mutations known to increase the affinity of human anti-PfCSP antibodies and efficient class-switch recombination to IgG were clear indicators for efficient GC reactions and active affinity maturation.
The defining features of our immunogen design as compared to RTS,S and R21 – the inclusion of the junction, a low number of NANP motifs and the exclusion of the immunodominant C-CSP – might have helped focusing the response on the potent junction and repeat epitopes. Limiting the NANP repeat length and thereby valency likely increased the BCR activation threshold to selectively activate only precursors with strong antigen-binding capacity30,34,40. At the same time, it may have promoted the subsequent differentiation of these precursors into GC rather than antibody-secreting cells. The junction by itself seems to be poorly immunogenic31 but is often targeted by cross-reactive antibodies that recognize NANP motifs in their core epitope and gain junction affinity by somatic mutations26. Our results suggest that limiting the number of NANP motifs might be essential for the induction of strong anti-junction responses. Together, the data strongly support our strategy to focus the immune response on the target epitopes of the most potent human anti-PfCSP antibodies while avoiding the induction of non-inhibitory PfCSP antibodies, especially in the immunodominant C-terminus.
For efficient presentation to the immune system, we fused the PfCSP component to the N-terminus of H. pylori apoferritin, exposing the target B cell epitopes on the exterior of the nanoparticle. H. pylori apoferritin shows only 20% sequence similarity to human ferritin and no cross-reactivity has been reported during clinical evaluations44,45 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03814720, NCT04579250). Immunogens that utilize the H. pylori apoferritin scaffold exhibit robust thermostability48,49 and high yields when adapted to a stable CHO manufacturing cell line50, illustrating the high translation potential of this scaffold. Presenting the PfCSP antigen on the surface of these nanoparticles drastically increased the anti-NANP serum response compared to monomeric PfCSP demonstrating that H. pylori apoferritin is a promising scaffold for the delivery of Plasmodium antigens.
The use of PADRE with its ability to elicit strong T cell responses via HLA-DR in humans (and via I-Ab in C57BL/6 mice)51,52 induced robust Ag-specific Tfh and potent memory responses linked to the generation of affinity matured long-lasting B cell immunity. Thus, PADRE compensated for the lack of the C-CSP, which contains the majority of all known T helper cell epitopes13–18. A potential drawback of choosing PADRE over PfCSP-derived epitopes could be that natural Pf infections will be unable to boost the vaccine-induced T cell memory response. However, the PfCSP C-terminus is highly polymorphic, and human T helper cells seem to be highly sensitive to the strong sequence variation in their target epitopes suggesting that boosting would be limited to infections with parasites that show high PfCSP sequence similarity to the vaccine strain, likely a rare natural event13–18.
The ability to hide T cell epitopes within the nanocage is an inherent advantage of the H. pylori apoferritin nanocage platform over other nanocage scaffolds, such as lumazine synthase or Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)-like disks that allow physical access to peptide epitopes fused to the termini in the context of the assembled multimer. PADRE being a small peptide might not be expected to induce strong humoral responses; furthermore, as would be expected from its encapsulation inside the nanocage, we did not observe PADRE-specific antibodies to the fused T cell epitope after immunization. Future studies leveraging the H. pylori apoferritin nanocage platform might benefit from further exploration of size and immunogenicity considerations for concealed T cell epitopes.
The addition of non-native N-linked glycans onto the H. pylori apoferritin scaffold was another engineered feature that contributed to augmenting the quality of the immune response. In contrast to a recent study that investigated the effect of scaffold glycosylation in the context of viral glycoprotein antigens53, we observed that in addition to dampening of the anti-scaffold response, glycan modification of the H. pylori apoferritin nanocage boosted anti-PfCSP responses and increased the frequency of PfCSP-reactive B cells compared to the non-glycosylated immunogen. Both effects were also evident in the BM plasma cell compartment indicating a long-lasting effect and qualitative difference in the response. Previous studies have shown that mannosylated protein nanoparticles accumulated in lymph node follicles in a mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and complement dependent manner, and that this accumulation was associated with an enhanced humoral response54,55. Our findings demonstrate the potential benefits of including mannosylated glycans on nanoparticles to improve vaccine responses. In contrast to many viral glycoprotein antigens (such as HA in influenza, Env in HIV-1, S protein in SARS-CoV-2, or F protein in RSV), the PfCSP junction and NANP repeats lack N-linked glycosylation sites. Therefore, by introducing mannosylated N-linked glycans onto the scaffold of this Pf vaccine candidate, we likely utilized the MBL and complement pathway to improve the antigen-specific humoral response. Further studies will be required to dissect the mechanisms that decreased anti-carrier responses while boosting anti-PfCSP immunity by the engineered N-linked glycans and how different glycoforms of the apoferritin nanocage might impact these mechanisms.
The overall high protective capacity of our immunogen, even at the lowest tested dose and over the six months after immunization demonstrates the success of our reverse vaccinology-based approach. Strong support for its further development comes from the observation that our H. pylori apoferritin-scaffolded immunogen elicited VH3-33 antibodies with similar VK pairings and somatic hypermutation patterns as potent human mAbs26,30,31,34 in the context of the human variable gene repertoire of the Kymouse™ platform. Future preclinical and, ultimately, clinical studies will be required to address the optimal choice of adjuvant for this vaccine candidate and to evaluate the full extent of its efficacy and durability in humans.
Methods
Immunogen expression and purification
To express and purify FL-PfCSP (NF54, residues 20–384), FL-PfCSP was cloned into pHLsec for transient expression in HEK293F cells. Putative N-linked glycan sites encoded in the sequence were mutated to glutamine. FL-PfCSP was purified via HisTrap FF (Cytiva) and size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL, Cytiva), prior to immunization studies. To generate immunogen 126, a gene comprising a Strep-II tag, TEV cleavage site, the PfCSP junction epitope, NVDP and NANP motifs, a 15-aa linker, H. pylori apoferritin, a 3-aa linker and PADRE was synthesized by GeneArt and cloned into pHLsec for transient expression in HEK293F cells. Immunogen 126 was purified via StrepTrap HP (Cytiva) followed by TEV cleavage of the Strep-II tag for 3 h at room temperature (RT). Cleaved immunogen 126 was further purified via an additional StrepTrap HP (Cytiva) and size exclusion chromatography (Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL, Cytiva) in PBS, prior to immunization studies. To generate immunogen 145 and introduce N-linked glycan sites onto the H. pylori apoferritin scaffold at positions 79 and 99, we introduced the following mutations; K79N, E81T, E99N and I101T. As recently reported, some nanoparticles with a high mannose content tended to exhibit more efficient follicular localization and stronger antibody responses compared to those with native, complex glycans54. Therefore, immunogen 145 was transiently transfected in HEK293S (GnT I−/−) cells to generate immunogen 145S.
Negative stain electron microscopy
3 μL of immunogens 126 and 145S were applied to glow-discharged carbon grids. After 20 s, the grid was blotted and 3 μL of 2 % (w/v) uranyl formate solution was applied to the grid three times for two lots of 5 s and a final 18 s, with blots in between. Data were collected on a FEI Tecnai 20 operated at 200 kV.
Biolayer interferometry binding studies
BLI (Octet RED96, Sartorius) experiments were conducted to test whether immunogens could be recognized by mAbs reactive to the junction and NANP motifs. mAbs CIS43, 1210, 1710, and 5D5 were diluted to 10 μg/mL in kinetics buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, 0.1 % (w/v) BSA, and 0.02% Tween20) and immobilized onto FAB2G biosensors. Following the establishment of a stable baseline with loaded ligand in kinetics buffer, biosensors were dipped into wells containing immunogen 126 or 145S. Tips were then dipped back into kinetics buffer to monitor the dissociation rate. Analysis of affinity constants was not attempted, as the high avidity of the interactions resulted in negligible dissociation rates.
LMQ preparation, formulations with immunogens and characterization
LMQ adjuvant was developed by and manufactured at the Vaccine Formulation Institute by mixing a solution of QS21 (Desert King International, CA, USA) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with liposomes containing the synthetic TLR4 agonist 3D-(6-acyl) PHAD (3D6AP; Merck-Avanti 699855P, USA). Liposomes were prepared by the lipid film method, using 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) and cholesterol as lipids. The TLR4 agonist 3D6AP was incorporated within the lipid film. Rehydration of the lipid film was done in PBS followed by extrusion to yield liposomes. To evaluate immunogens compatibility with adjuvant, stability of formulations containing the immunogens in combination with LMQ was monitored after storage for 24 h at 5 °C. Formulations were characterized by visual inspection, particle size, polydispersity, zeta potential, pH and osmolality. The lipid content was also measured by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-UV (Agilent Technologies, CA, US) and QS21/3D6AP amounts measured by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (Waters, MA, US).
Mice
For immunization experiments, female C57BL/6J mice (Janvier labs) were maintained at a specific pathogen-free facility of the Central Animal Laboratory of the German Cancer Research Center. All C57BL/6J mouse procedures were approved by the regional authorities in Karlsruhe, Germany (project numbers G-255/17 and G-278/20) and experiments were conducted in accordance with the German Animal Protection Law.
Male and female transgenic mice from the Kymouse™ platform42 were housed and all procedures carried out under United Kingdom Home Office License 70/8718 with the approval of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body.
For generation of the new PbPfCSP(mCherry) reporter line, female OF1 mice (6–7-week old; Charles River, NL) were used. All animal experiments were granted with a license by Competent Authority after an advice on the ethical evaluation by the Animal Experiments Committee Leiden (AVD1160020171625). All experiments were performed in accordance with the Experiments on Animals Act (Wod, 2014), the applicable legislation in the Netherlands in accordance with the European guidelines (EU directive no. 2010/63/EU) regarding the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. All experiments were executed in a licensed establishment for the use of experimental animals (LUMC). Mice were housed in individually ventilated cages furnished with autoclaved aspen woodchip, fun tunnel, wood chew block and nestlets at 21 ± 2 °C under a 12:12 h light-dark cycle at a relative humidity of 55 ± 10%.
For mosquito infections with PbPfCSP(mCherry) parasites, female CD1 mice (7–12-week old) and female C57BL/6J mice (14-week old) were bred in the MPIIB Experimental Animal Facility (Marienfelde, Berlin) and housed in a pathogen-free animal facility at the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology in individually ventilated cages containing nestlets, fun tunnel and wood chew block. Mice were handled in accordance with the German Animal Protection Law (§8 Tierschutzgesetz) and approved by the Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales (LAGeSo), Berlin, Germany (project numbers 368/12 and H0335/17).
Mouse immunizations
Immunogens were mixed 1:1 with Sigma Adjuvant System (SAS, Sigma) according to manufacturer’s instruction or with LMQ (as described above). Adjuvant control animals received a PBS-adjuvant mixture. Mice were immunized at an age of 7–9 weeks, according to the immunization schedule and immunogen dose mentioned in the figure legends. Each mouse received 100 μl immunogen-SAS mixture subcutaneously (s.c.) at the right and left side of the tail base or 25 μl immunogen-LMQ mixture injected intramuscularly (i.m.) into the right and left thigh muscle.
Blood and organ collections
Peripheral whole blood was collected from the submandibular vein, allowed to clot for 1–2 h at RT and kept at 4 °C for 4–16 h. Serum was collected after spinning at 2350 g in a top-bench centrifuge for 5 min at 4 °C, and stored at −20 °C.
Mice were sacrificed 7 days after the final boost by cervical dislocation (C57BL/6J mice) or under UK Home Office Schedule 1 by rising concentration of CO2 (mice from the Kymouse™ platform). Popliteal, inguinal and axial lymph nodes, spleens, and bone marrow were collected. Single-cell suspensions were prepared by mashing cells through a 40 μm cell strainer (BD).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Antigen ELISAs were performed as described27. In brief, high-binding 384-well polystyrene plates (Corning) were coated overnight at 4 °C with 2 µg/ml NPDPNANPNVDPNANP (junction,) (NANP)5 (repeat), SLGENDDGNNEDNEKLRKPKHKKLKQPADGNPDP (N-CSP), NKNNQGNGQGHNMPNDPNRNVDENANANSAVKNNNNEEPSDKHIKEYLNKIQNSLSTEWSPCSVTCGNGIQVRIKPGSANKPKDELDYANDIEKKICKMEKCSSVFNVVNSS (C-CSP), 0.7 µg/ml AKFVAAWTLKAAA (PADRE) or 1 µg/ml H. pylori apoferritin in 20 µl. Plates were washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS, blocked with 50 µL of 4% BSA in PBS for 1 h at RT, and washed again prior to incubation with 20µL per well of serum samples diluted in 1% BSA in PBS for 90 min at RT. Wells were washed six times and incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP at 1:1000 (Jackson Immuno Research) in PBS with 1% BSA for 1 h. Wells were washed again and one-step ABTS substrate (RT, 20 µL per well; Roche) and 1× KPL ABTS peroxidase stop solution (RT, 20 µL per well; SeraCare Life Sciences) were used for detection. The concentration of antigen-specific IgG was determined by comparison to an IgG1 standard curve (BD Pharming) of known concentration on each plate.
Enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot)
The ELISpot assay was conducted according to the manufacturer´s protocol (Mouse IgG/IgM double color ELISpot kit, Immunospot). Briefly, 96-well assay plates were coated overnight with 1 µg/ml FL-PfCSP (3D7) or H. pylori apoferritin. The next day, primary bone marrow cells were seeded at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/well for each antigen. Plates were incubated for 16–18 h in a cell culture incubator (37 °C, 8% CO2) before being developed. Spots were automatically counted using a CTL immunospot reader.
Serum NANP antibody depletion
HisPur Cobalt Resin (50 µl, Thermo Fisher) was washed with binding buffer (300 mM NaCl and 50 mM Na3PO4) twice by spinning at 700 × g for 2 min followed by removal of the supernatant and coated with 80 µg/ml (NANP)10H6 in binding buffer for 3 h at 4 °C rotating. Beads were washed again and blocked for 3 h with 4% BSA in PBS at RT rotating. Sera of mice from each group were pooled and 200 µl of pooled sera was diluted 1:1 in imidazole buffer (20 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Na3PO4) were added to the beads that had been washed again and incubated for a minimum of 2 h at 4 °C rotating. Beads were spun down and supernatant was transferred to a new tube with coated and washed beads. This procedure was repeated two times before further analysis in ELISA or Pf sporozoite hepatocyte traversal assay.
CFSE proliferation assay
Splenocytes (1 × 107) were resuspended in 1 ml PBS. 1 ml of 1 µM CFSE (Sigma) solution in PBS was added slowly to the tube followed by incubation for 8–10 min at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding pre-warmed 10% FCS in PBS solution. Cells were washed in PBS and resuspended in 1 ml DMEM containing 10% FCS, 0.01 M Hepes, 2 mM L-Glutamine, 0.05 mM β-Mercaptoethanol, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Cells were plated at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/200 µL to a 96-well round U bottom plate without or with PADRE or OVALBUMIN at various concentrations mentioned in the figure legends and incubated for three days at 37 °C and 8% CO2.
Preparation of p126-SA tetramers for flow cytometric analysis
Peptide p126 (GKQPADGNPDPNANPNVDPNANPNVDPNANPNVDPNANPNANPNANPNANPNANP, Peptide Specialty Laboratories GmbH, Heidelberg) at a concentration of 0.64 μg/µl in PBS was slowly mixed with either SA-PE (Agilent Technologies) or SA-APC (Agilent Technologies) in a 1:4.1 molar ratio. After overnight incubation at 4 °C in the dark, sterile PBS was added before transfer to a 50K membrane filtration tube (Merck-Millipore) and centrifugation for 5 min at 8,000 x g until about 50 μl were left. After washing the tetramers once by repeating the above procedure, filters were inserted upside down into a collection tube and centrifuged for 3 min at 1,000 x g. Subsequently, 100 μl of sterile PBS was added to the filter and centrifuged for collection into the same tube as described above. After repeating the previous step, both tetramers were mixed and topped up to a concentration of 87.5 pmol/ml with PBS containing 2% FCS to be used in FACS.
Flow cytometric analysis
Single-cell suspensions from lymph nodes, bone marrow or spleen cell cultures (CFSE proliferation assay) of C57BL/6J mice were incubated for 15 min at 4 °C with anti-CD16/CD32 Fc-receptor block (2.4G2, eBiosciences, #14-0161-82, 1:100), followed by incubation for 1 h at RT with p126-SA tetramers or PADRE-MHCII tetramers (I-A(b) synthetic epitope PADRE AKFVAAWTLKAA APC-Labeled Tetramer (NIH)). Cells were then washed and stained with anti-CD4-APC-Cy7 (GK1.5, Biolegend, #100414, 1:100), anti-CD8-APC-R700 (53–6.7, BD Biosciences, #564983, 1:200), anti-CD44- BV785 (IM7, Biolegend, #103041, 1:100), anti-CD44- FITC (IM7, BD Pharmigen, #553133), anti-CD62L-BV711 (MEL-14, Biolegend, #104445, 1:800), anti-PD-1-BV605 (J43, BD Biosciences, #563059, 1:100), anti-CXCR5-BV421 (L138D7, Biolegend, #145511, 1:400), anti-GL-7-FITC (GL7, BD Pharmigen, #562080, 1:1000), anti-CD38-Pe-Cy7 (90, Biolegend, #102718, 1:400), anti-IgD-APC-Cy7 (11-26c.2a, Biolegend, #405715, 1:1000), anti-CD19-APC-Red (1D3, BD Biosciences, #565473, 1:400), anti-IgM-BV786 (II/41, BD Biosciences, #743328, 1:100), anti-IgG1-BV510 (RMG1-1, Biolegend, #406621, 1:100), anti-IgG2a/b-BV510 (R2-40, BD Biosciences, #744293, 1:100), anti-IgG3-BV510 (R40-82, BD Biosciences, #744134, 1:100) and anti-TACI-BV421 (8F10, BD Biosciences, #742840, 1:200) antibody respectively, all diluted in PBS containing 2% FCS. Dead cells were excluded using 7-Aminoactinomycin D (7AAD, Life Technologies).
Single-cell preparation from lymph nodes of mice of the Kymouse™ platform were incubated for 10 min at 4 °C with TruStain FcX/Fc blocker (Biolegend), followed by incubation for 30 min at 4 °C with FL-PfCSP-SA-APC tetramers, generated by incubation in a (4:1 CSP: Streptavidin (Prozyme) ratio) for 30 min at 4 °C and with anti-CD19-BV510 (6D5, Biolegend, #115546, 1:80), anti-CD45R/B220-BUV395 (RA3-6B2, BD Biosciences, #563793, 1:80), anti-GL7-eFluor450 (GL7, eBiosience, #48-5902-82, 1:80), anti-CD95-PE-Cy7 (Jo2, BD Biosciences, #557653, 1:80) all diluted in Brilliant stain buffer (BD Biosciences). Dead cells were excluded using Draq7 (BioStatus) together with the following antibodies staining Dump channel positive cells: anti-CD8-APC-Cy7 (53–6.7, BD Bioscience, #557654, 1:80), anti-CD4-APC-Cy7 (GK1.5, BD Bioscience, #552051, 1:80), anti-Ly-6G-APC-Cy7(RB6-8C5, BD Pharmingen, #557661, 1:80), anti-F4/80-APC-Cy7 (BM8, Biolegend, #123118, 1:80) and anti-CD11c-APC-Cy7 (HL3, BD Pharmingen, #561241, 1:80). Data were collected on a BD FACSAriaTM III cell sorter, using the BD FACSDivaTM software. Cell events were analyzed using the FlowJo v10.7.2 software.
Mosquitoes
All mosquitoes were kept at 28–30 °C, 70–80% humidity and 12:12 h light-dark cycle. Anopheles coluzzii Ngousso S1 strain56 was used for the production of Pf NF54 sporozoites for in vitro traversal assays and sporozoite binding assays. A. gambiae 7b line, immunocompromised transgenic mosquitoes derived from the G3 laboratory strain57, were used for the production of PbPfCSP(mCherry) sporozoites for in vivo infections.
P. falciparum cultures
P. falciparum NF54 parasites (a kind gift of R. Sauerwein) were cultured in O+ human red blood cells (Haema, Berlin) at 37 °C, 4% CO2 and 3% O2 in a Heracell 150i Tri-gas incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For gametocyte production, asynchronous asexual parasite cultures were diluted to 1% parasitemia and 4% hematocrit and maintained for 15–16 d with daily change of RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% human A+ serum (Haema, Berlin) and 10 mM hypoxanthine (c-c-Pro) until mosquito infections.
P. falciparum sporozoite hepatocyte traversal assay
The human hepatocyte line HC-0458 was cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in HC-04 medium (MEM (- L-glu, Gibco) and F-12 Nutrient Mix (+L-glu, Gibco) 1:1 vol/vol mix, 15 mM HEPES, 1.5 g/l NaHCO3, 2.5 mM additional L-glutamine, 10% FCS and 1X Penicillin-Streptomycin (Gibco)).
A. coluzzii mosquitoes were infected with mature Pf gametocytes via artificial midi-feeders (Glass Instruments, the Netherlands) for 15 min and kept at 26 °C and 80% humidity in a controlled S3 facility in accordance with local safety authorizations (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales Berlin, Germany, LAGeSo, project number 297/13). Infected mosquitoes received an additional uninfected blood meal 8 days post-infection (dpi) and were collected at 13–15 dpi. Sporozoites were isolated in HC-04 medium by dissecting and grinding mosquito thorax portions containing the salivary glands with glass pestles, followed by filtering the extracts with a 40 µm cell strainer (BD Biosciences). The isolated salivary gland sporozoites were enumerated in a hemocytometer (Malassez) and used for traversal assays. Sera from individual mice from the same experimental group were pooled in an equivolumetric fashion. Salivary gland Pf sporozoites in HC-04 medium were pre-incubated with diluted pooled serum samples for 30 min on ice and added to HC-04 cells for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in the presence of 0.5 mg mL–1 dextran-rhodamine (Molecular Probes). Cells were washed, trypsinized and fixed with 1% PFA in PBS before measuring dextran positivity using a FACS LSR II instrument (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed by subtraction of the background (dextran positivity in cells treated with uninfected mosquito salivary gland material) and normalization to the maximum Pf traversal capacity (dextran positivity in cells treated with salivary gland Pf sporozoites without serum) using FlowJo V.10.0.8 (Tree Star) (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Transgenic P. berghei parasite lines expressing PfCSP
To generate transgenic P. berghei parasites expressing PfCSP and the reporter mCherry (PbPfCSP(mCherry)), the published reference reporter P. berghei (ANKA) line expressing mCherry and luciferase under the constitutive hsp70 and eef1a promotors, respectively (Pb-mCherryhsp70-Luceef1a; line 1868cl1, RMgm-1320, www.pberghei.eu) was used59. To generate a chimeric parasite line that has the Pbcsp gene (PBANKA_0403200) replaced with the Pfcsp gene (PF3D7_0304600/PfNF54_030009700) we used a 2-step gene insertion/marker out transfection protocol (GIMO)60. In the first step, we deleted the Pbcsp coding open reading frame (ORF) and replaced it with the positive-negative selectable marker (SM), to create a P. berghei CSP deletion GIMO line (PbCSP GIMO). For this purpose, we generated the pL2153 construct that is based on the standard GIMO DNA construct pL0034 (MRA-849, www.beiresources.org). This construct contains the positive-negative (hdhfr::yfcu) SM cassette, and was used to insert both the PbCSP 5’- and 3’-gene targeting regions (TR), encompassing the full-length promoter and transcription terminator (TR) sequences, respectively. The construct was linearized using Apa I, Xho I and Sca I restriction sites outside of the 5’- and 3’-TRs before transfection. Pb-mCherryhsp70-Luceef1a parasites were transfected with pL2153 using standard methods of GIMO-transfection60. Transfected parasites were selected by positive selection in mice by providing pyrimethamine in the drinking water61. Cloning of selected parasites resulted in line 3065cl1 Pb-mCherryhsp70-Luceef1a-CSP-GIMO. Correct integration of DNA construct into the genome of parasites of line 3065cl1 was verified by Southern analyses of Pulsed Field Gel (PFG)-separated chromosomes and by diagnostic PCR analysis60. PFG-separated chromosomes were hybridized with a mixture of two probes: a probe recognizing the hdhfr gene and a control probe recognizing gene PBANKA_0508000 on chromosome 562. PCR primers used to confirm correct integration of the construct into the CSP locus are shown in Supplementary Fig. 13. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
In the second step, the positive-negative SM in the Pb-mCherryhsp70-Luceef1a-CSP-GIMO parasites (line 3065cl1) was replaced with the Pfcsp gene by GIMO transfection, using construct pL1972 containing Pfcsp (PF3D7_0304600/PfNF54_030009700) flanked by the Pbcsp 5’- and 3’-gene targeting regions27. The construct was linearized using Afl II and Sac I restriction sites before transfection and used to transfect parasites using standard methods of GIMO-transfection60. Transfected parasites were selected in mice by applying negative selection by providing 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) in the drinking water60. Transgenic parasites with the hdhfr::yfcu SM in the csp locus of Pb-mCherryhsp70-Luceef1a-CSP-GIMO parasites replaced by the Pfcsp gene, were selected by negative selection with 5-FC and cloned by limiting dilution resulting in PbPfCSP(mCherry) parasites (line 3079cl1). Correct integration of DNA construct into the genome was verified by Southern analyses of Pulsed Field Gel (PFG)-separated chromosomes and by diagnostic PCR analysis60. PFG-separated chromosomes were hybridized with a mixture of two probes: a probe recognizing the hdhfr gene and a control probe recognizing gene fragment of PBANKA_0508000 on chromosome 562. PCR primers used to confirm correct integration of the construct into the PfCSP locus are shown in Supplementary Fig. 13. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Challenge of immunized mice with PbPfCSP(mCherry) sporozoites
PbPfCSP(mCherry) blood stage parasites were passaged every 3–4 d in CD1 female mice, and A. gambiae 7b mosquitoes were infected (0.5–0.9% gametocytemia), kept at 20 °C and 80% humidity and offered an additional uninfected blood meal at 7 dpi. PbPfCSP(mCherry)-infected mosquitoes were knock down on ice at 17 dpi and selected for mCherry signal in the salivary glands under a fluorescence stereo microscope (Leica, M205 FA, Supplementary Fig. 14a). Salivary gland-positive mosquitoes were singled out in individual containers and starved overnight. The next day (18 dpi), anesthetized naïve C57BL/6J mice (14-week old) were exposed for 10 min to three or five bites of the presorted PbPfCSP(mCherry)-infected mosquitoes. Mouse blood was collected from the tail vein in heparinized capillaries (Brand) in PBS and parasitemia (mCherry-positive red blood cells / total red blood cells) was measured from days 3 to 7 and on day 10 post mosquito bite by flow cytometry (LSR II instrument, BD Biosciences). Blood stage positivity and negativity were confirmed by Giemsa-stained thin blood smears before mouse euthanasia and on day 10 post mosquito bite, respectively. All infected mice were euthanized on day 7 post mosquito bite, before the occurrence of malaria symptoms. FACS data were analyzed by FlowJo V.10.0.8 and the prepatency period was declared on the first day when parasitaemia values were above the background signal from negative mice. In these controlled conditions, three bites from salivary gland-positive mosquitoes were sufficient for 100% patent infection in naïve mice at day 5 post mosquito bite (n = 10, Supplementary Fig. 14b). Therefore, 3 bites were chosen as a controlled inoculum dose in the immunization experiments. Challenge by mosquito bite was performed in immunized mice (51 or 141 days post immunization) as detailed above (Supplementary Fig. 14c).
Quantification of serum-antibody binding to live Pf sporozoites by flow cytometry
Pf sporozoites were isolated from mosquito salivary glands 13–15 dpi using the same procedures described for traversal assay. Siliconized microcentrifuge tubes (Alpha Laboratories) and pipet tips (VWR) were used to minimize sporozoite binding to the surfaces. Immunized mice pooled sera pre or post NANP antibody depletion (dilution 1:100) were incubated with 150,000 sporozoites in a total volume of 100 µl PBS with 1% FCS for 30 min at 4 °C. Upon washing, the sporozoites were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 555 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Molecular Probes; A-21422, 1:1,000) and SYBR Green I nuclear dye (Thermo Scientific; S7563, 1:10,000) in PBS with 1% BSA for 30 min at 4 °C. After washing, the live sporozoites were identified by SYBR Green signal and serum-antibody binding was quantified using FACS LSR II instrument (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed using FlowJo V.10.0.8 (Tree Star).
Single-cell analysis
Spleens, lymph nodes and bone marrow isolated from each mouse from the Kymouse™ platform were processed to single-cell suspensions, cryopreserved in 10% DMSO/FBS and stored in liquid nitrogen. The target population, CD19+ B220+ GL7+ CD95+ germinal center B cells from spleen and lymph nodes was sorted into individual wells in a 96-well plate filled with lysis buffer (RNA Lysis buffer from QuickExtract™ RNA Extraction Kit, Epicentre, QER090150) using the BD FACS Aria Fusion flow cytometer (Beckton Dickinson). RT-PCR was performed to amplify the VH and VL domains, and standard Illumina libraries were generated before sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq. Reads corresponding to the same plate/well location were combined into consensus sequences. Germline assignment and sequence annotation of the consensus sequences was performed using the Kymab seq-utils Java program that automates the constant-region binning and identifies the V(D)J segments in large sets of antibody transcript sequences42. Sequence analysis was performed using R version 4.2.263.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 7.04 (GraphPad) or R version 4.2.263 using two-tailed Mann–Whitney assuming non-normal distribution, Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s correction or two-tailed Mantel–Cox log-rank test for in vivo experiments, as described in the figure legends. P values below 0.05 were considered significant and indicated by asterisks.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank C. Winter, C. Niesik, M. Stoll (DKFZ) and H. Gordon, C. Kreschel, L. Spohr, M. Andres and D. Eyermann (MPIIB) for technical assistance. The PADRE-MHCII tetramers was obtained from NIH. HC-04, human hepatocytes, MRA-975 were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH, contributed by Jetsumon Sattabongkot Prachumsri. The work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1179906; J.-P.J, H.W. and E.A.L. and OPP1159947; S.B. and P.K.), by the CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholar program (J.P.J.), the Ontario Early Researcher Award program (J.P.J.), and the Canada Research Chair program (J.P.J.). S.W.S. was supported by a SickKids Lap-Chee Tsui Postdoctoral Fellowship and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship. Biophysical instruments were accessed at the Structural and Biophysical Core Facility, The Hospital for Sick Children, supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation and Ontario Research Fund. The development of LMQ adjuvant and its formulation with the nanoparticle-based malaria vaccine candidate is supported by grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV001759 (VFI Adjuvants for Global Health) and INV010271 (Global Health Discovery Collaboratory)) to VFI.
Author contributions
J. Ludwig (co-first-author) designed and conducted experiments, interpreted experimental results and wrote the paper. S.W.S. (co-first-author) designed the immunogens, conducted experiments, interpreted experimental results and wrote the paper. G.C. (co-first-author) designed and conducted experiments, interpreted experimental results and wrote the paper. S.H. conducted experiments and interpreted experimental results. R.M. designed and conducted experiments, interpreted experimental results. J. Lossin conducted experiments and interpreted experimental results. K.P. conducted experiments and interpreted experimental results. A.O. performed analyses and interpreted results. N.L. conducted experiments and interpreted experimental results. B.F. conducted experiments and interpreted experimental results. C.J.J. conducted experiments and interpreted experimental results. S.B. designed and conducted experiments and interpreted experimental results. P.K. designed experiments and interpreted experimental results. C.L. prepared the LMQ adjuvant and characterized formulation with immunogen. N.C. performed quality control. E.A.L., H.W. and J.-P.J. conceived the study, designed and supervised the experiments, interpreted all results and wrote the paper. Funding acquisition: J.-P.J, H.W., E.A.L, P.K., N.C. and S.W.S.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files). The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
S.H., J. Lossin, A.O., N.L., B.F., C.J.J., S. B., P.K. declare no conflicts of interest. J. Ludwig, S.W.S., G.C., R.M., K.P., H.W., E.A.L. and J.-P.J. have filed a patent application related to the immunogens described in this work.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Julia Ludwig, Stephen W. Scally, Giulia Costa.
Change history
6/5/2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41541-023-00687-x
Contributor Information
Elena A. Levashina, Email: levashina@mpiib-berlin.mpg.de
Hedda Wardemann, Email: h.wardemann@dkfz.de.
Jean-Philippe Julien, Email: jean-philippe.julien@sickkids.ca.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41541-023-00653-7.
References
- 1.WHO. World Malaria Report 2021 (WHO Press, 2021).
- 2.Sidjanski SP, Vanderberg JP, Sinnis P. Anopheles stephensi salivary glands bear receptors for region I of the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1997;90:33–41. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(97)00124-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ménard R, et al. Circumsporozoite protein is required for development of malaria sporozoites in mosquitoes. Nature. 1997;385:336–339. doi: 10.1038/385336a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Frevert U, et al. Intravital observation of plasmodium berghei sporozoite infection of the liver. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cerami C, et al. The basolateral domain of the hepatocyte plasma membrane bears receptors for the circumsporozoite protein of plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. Cell. 1992;70:1021–1033. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Enea V, et al. DNA cloning of plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite gene: amino acid sequence of repetitive epitope. Science. 1984;225:628–630. doi: 10.1126/science.6204384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dame JB, et al. Structure of the gene encoding the immunodominant surface antigen on the sporozoite of the human malaria parasite plasmodium falciparum. Science. 1984;225:587–593. doi: 10.1126/science.6204383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Casares S, Brumeanu TD, Richie TL. The RTS,S malaria vaccine. Vaccine. 2010;28:4880–4894. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stoute JA, et al. A preliminary evaluation of a recombinant circumsporozoite protein vaccine against plasmodium falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;336:86–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701093360202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Julien J-P, Wardemann H. Antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum malaria at the molecular level. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19:761–775. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0209-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Doud MB, et al. Unexpected fold in the circumsporozoite protein target of malaria vaccines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:7817–7822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205737109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gandhi K, et al. Variation in the circumsporozoite protein of plasmodium falciparum: vaccine development implications. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e101783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wahl I, et al. Clonal evolution and TCR specificity of the human TFH cell response to Plasmodium falciparum CSP. Sci. Immunol. 2022;7:9644. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abm9644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guttinger M, et al. Human T cells recognize polymorphic and non-polymorphic regions of the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein. EMBO J. 1988;7:2555–2558. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03104.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Good MF, et al. Human T-cell recognition of the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum: Immunodominant T-cell domains map to the polymorphic regions of the molecule. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1988;85:1199–1203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moreno A, et al. CD4+ T cell clones obtained from Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite-immunized volunteers recognize polymorphic sequences of the circumsporozoite protein. J. Immunol. 1993;151:489–499. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.151.1.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jalloh A, Jalloh M, Matsuoka H. T-cell epitope polymorphisms of the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein among field isolates from Sierra Leone: Age-dependent haplotype distribution? Malar. J. 2009;8:120. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Neafsey DE, et al. Genetic diversity and protective efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:2025–2037. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.RTS SCTP. Efficacy and safety of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine with or without a booster dose in infants and children in Africa: Final results of a phase 3, individually randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:31–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60721-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mugo RM, et al. Seven-year kinetics of RTS, S/AS01-induced anti-CSP antibodies in young Kenyan children. Malar. J. 2021;20:452. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03961-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Datoo MS, et al. Efficacy of a low-dose candidate malaria vaccine, R21 in adjuvant Matrix-M, with seasonal administration to children in Burkina Faso: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397:1809–1818. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00943-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Datoo MS, et al. Efficacy and immunogenicity of R21/Matrix-M vaccine against clinical malaria after 2 years’ follow-up in children in Burkina Faso: a phase 1/2b randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022;22:1728–1736. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00442-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Birkett A, Miller RS, Soisson LA. The importance of exercising caution when comparing results from malaria vaccines administered on the EPI schedule and on a seasonal schedule. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022;1:1. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0544a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Murugan R, et al. Clonal selection drives protective memory B cell responses in controlled human malaria infection. Sci. Immunol. 2018;3:8029. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aap8029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thai E, et al. A high-affinity antibody against the CSP N-terminal domain lacks Plasmodium falciparum inhibitory activity. J. Exp. Med. 2020;217:e20200061. doi: 10.1084/jem.20200061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Murugan R, et al. Evolution of protective human antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein repeat motifs. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1135–1145. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0881-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Triller G, et al. Natural parasite exposure induces protective human anti-malarial antibodies. Immunity. 2017;47:1197–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang LT, et al. A potent anti-malarial human monoclonal antibody targets circumsporozoite protein minor repeats and neutralizes sporozoites in the liver. Immunity. 2020;53:733–744.e8.. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Scally SW, et al. Rare human antibodies against the circumsporozoite protein C-terminal domain are ineffective against Pf sporozoites. J. Exp. Med. 2018;215:63–75. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kisalu NK, et al. A human monoclonal antibody prevents malaria infection by targeting a new site of vulnerability on the parasite. Nat. Med. 2018;24:408–416. doi: 10.1038/nm.4512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tan J, et al. A public antibody lineage that potently inhibits malaria infection through dual binding to the circumsporozoite protein. Nat. Med. 2018;24:401–407. doi: 10.1038/nm.4513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beutler N, et al. A novel CSP C-Terminal epitope targeted by an antibody with protective activity against Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18:e1010409. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Espinosa DA, et al. Proteolytic cleavage of the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein is a target of protective antibodies. J. Infect. Dis. 2015;212:1111–1119. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chatterjee D, et al. Avid binding by B cells to the Plasmodium circumsporozoite protein repeat suppresses responses to protective subdominant epitopes. Cell Rep. 2021;35:108996. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chaitra MG, Nayak R, Shaila MS. Modulation of immune responses in mice to recombinant antigens from PE and PPE families of proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Ribi adjuvant. Vaccine. 2007;25:7168–7176. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zavala F, Cochrane AH, Nardin EH, Nussenzweig RS, Nussenzweig V. Circumsporozoite proteins of malaria parasites contain a single immunodominant region with two or more identical epitopes. J. Exp. Med. 1983;157:1947–1957. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.6.1947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zavala F, et al. Rationale for development of a synthetic vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Science. 1985;228:1436–1440. doi: 10.1126/science.2409595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Langowski MD, et al. Restricted valency (NPNA)n repeats and junctional epitope-based circumsporozoite protein vaccines against Plasmodium falciparum. npj Vaccines. 2022;7:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41541-022-00430-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Langowski MD, et al. Optimization of a Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein repeat vaccine using the tobacco mosaic virus platform. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:3114–3122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911792117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cockburn IA, Seder RA. Malaria prevention: from immunological concepts to effective vaccines and protective antibodies. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:1199–1211. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Alexander J, et al. The optimization of helper T lymphocyte (HTL) function in vaccine development. Immunologic Res. 1998;18:79–92. doi: 10.1007/BF02788751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee E-C, et al. Complete humanization of the mouse immunoglobulin loci enables efficient therapeutic antibody discovery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:356–363. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Imkeller K, et al. Antihomotypic affinity maturation improves human B cell responses against a repetitive epitope. Science. 2018;360:1358–1362. doi: 10.1126/science.aar5304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Houser KV, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a ferritin nanoparticle H2 influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a phase 1 trial. Nat. Med. 2022;28:383–391. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01660-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kanekiyo M, et al. Self-assembling influenza nanoparticle vaccines elicit broadly neutralizing H1N1 antibodies. Nature. 2013;499:102–106. doi: 10.1038/nature12202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rivera-Hernandez, T. et al. Vaccine-induced th1-type response protects against invasive group a Streptococcus infection in the absence of opsonizing antibodies. MBio 11 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Rappuoli R, Bottomley MJ, D’Oro U, Finco O, De Gregorio E. Reverse vaccinology 2.0: Human immunology instructs vaccine antigen design. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:469–481. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sliepen K, et al. Structure and immunogenicity of a stabilized HIV-1 envelope trimer based on a group-M consensus sequence. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10262-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kanekiyo M, et al. Rational design of an Epstein-Barr virus vaccine targeting the receptor-binding site. Cell. 2015;162:1090–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Swanson KA, et al. A respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) F protein nanoparticle vaccine focuses antibody responses to a conserved neutralization domain. Sci. Immunol. 2020;5:6466. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aba6466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Alexander J, et al. Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides. Immunity. 1994;1:751–761. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(94)80017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fraser CC, et al. Generation of a universal CD4 memory T cell recall peptide effective in humans, mice and non-human primates. Vaccine. 2014;32:2896–2903. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kraft JC, et al. Antigen- and scaffold-specific antibody responses to protein nanoparticle immunogens. Cell Rep. Med. 2022;3:100780. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Read BJ, et al. Mannose-binding lectin and complement mediate follicular localization and enhanced immunogenicity of diverse protein nanoparticle immunogens. Cell Rep. 2022;38:110217. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tokatlian T, et al. Innate immune recognition of glycans targets HIV nanoparticle immunogens to germinal centers. Science. 2019;363:649–654. doi: 10.1126/science.aat9120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Harris C, et al. Polymorphisms in Anopheles gambiae Immune Genes Associated with Natural Resistance to Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001112. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pompon J, Levashina EA. A new role of the mosquito complement-like cascade in male fertility in Anopheles gambiae. PLOS Biol. 2015;13:e1002255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sattabongkot J, et al. Establishment of a human hepatocyte line that supports in vitro development of the exo-erythrocytic stages of the malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006;74:708–715. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Prado M, et al. Long-term live imaging reveals cytosolic immune responses of host hepatocytes against plasmodium infection and parasite escape mechanisms. Autophagy. 2015;11:1561–1579. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1067361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lin J, et al. A novel ‘gene insertion/marker out’ (GIMO) method for transgene expression and gene complementation in rodent malaria parasites. PLoS One. 2011;6:e29289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Janse CJ, Ramesar J, Waters AP. High-efficiency transfection and drug selection of genetically transformed blood stages of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:346–356. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Salman, A. M. et al. In Methods in Molecular Biology 1325, 257-286 (Humana Press Inc., 2015).
- 63.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing 11 (R Core Team). https://www.r-project.org.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files). The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.