Skip to main content
International Journal for Equity in Health logoLink to International Journal for Equity in Health
. 2023 Apr 6;22:63. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01866-x

Factors influencing treatment status of syphilis among pregnant women: a retrospective cohort study in Guangzhou, China

Huihui Liu 1,2,3,#, Niannian Chen 1,2,3,#, Weiming Tang 4, Songying Shen 1,2,3, Jia Yu 2, Huiyun Xiao 2, Xingwen Zou 2, Jianrong He 1,2,3, Joseph D Tucker 4,5, Xiu Qiu 1,2,3,6,
PMCID: PMC10080893  PMID: 37024898

Abstract

Background

Many syphilis infected pregnant women do not receive treatment, representing a major missed opportunity to reduce the risk of syphilis-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study explored correlates of treatment among pregnant women with syphilis in Guangzhou, China.

Methods

Pregnant women with a diagnosis of syphilis in Guangzhou between January 2014 and December 2016 were included. Information of syphilis treatment and correlates were extracted from a comprehensive national case-reporting system. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the correlations between information on the demographic characteristics, previous history, clinical characteristics about current syphilis, information of diagnosing hospital, and receiving no treatment or inadequate treatment among syphilis-seropositive pregnant women. A causal mediation analysis was used to explore the potential mediating role of the timing of syphilis diagnosis in the correlates.

Results

Among 1248 syphilis-seropositive pregnant women, 379 (30.4%) women received no treatment or inadequate treatment. Migrant pregnant women (adjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.25–2.73), multiparous participants (adjusted OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 2.51–5.50), unmarried participants (adjusted OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.97–5.28) and unemployed participants (adjusted OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.41–4.39) were more likely to receive no treatment or inadequate treatment. Participants who with history of syphilis infection (adjusted OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42–0.82) and with high school and higher education participants (adjusted OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.97) were less likely to receive untreated or inadequately treatment. And that the impact of all these factors (except for the migrants) on treatment status are fully mediated through the syphilis diagnosis time, with the direct effect of migrants that would have resulted in a higher rate of no or inadequate treatment (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.08–5.32) was partially cancelled out by the syphilis diagnosis time.

Conclusions

Pregnant women who were migrant without local residence and women with syphilis diagnosed at a later gestational age were more likely to slip through the cracks of the existing antenatal care system. More programs should focus on eliminating these gaps of residence-related health inequalities. This research highlights actionable elements for health services interventions that could increase syphilis treatment rates among pregnant women.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-023-01866-x.

Keywords: Syphilis, Treatment, Risk factors, Pregnant women

Background

Maternal syphilis is a health threat to both pregnant women and their children. Without treatment, syphilis during pregnancy may result in stillbirth, neonatal death, prematurity, low birth weight, and congenital syphilis [1, 2]. Approximately one million pregnant women are infected with syphilis each year, leading to over 350,000 births with adverse outcomes (including 200,000 stillbirths and neonatal deaths) worldwide [35]. Preventing maternal syphilis is one of the most cost-effective public health measures that can strengthen health systems by improving access to quality-assured prenatal screening and saving newborn lives [6].

Timely treatment of maternal syphilis with an intramuscular injection of penicillin can reliably prevent mother-to-child transmission and other syphilis-related adverse pregnancy outcomes [7]. However, many infected women do not receive testing or treatment in low- and middle-income countries [8]. In 2013, around 38% of pregnant women with syphilis in China received untreated [9], similar to treatment rates among pregnant women with syphilis in Brazil [10]. Meanwhile, nearly all pregnant women with syphilis receive treatment in the United Kingdom [11].

To reduce the incidence of mother-to-child syphilis transmission in China, the Ministry of Health integrated and standardized the prevention programs for mother-to-child transmission (iPMTCT) of HIV, syphilis, and HBV in 2010. The ministry initiated nationwide comprehensive services [12]. According to the iPMTCT program, an opt-out syphilis testing and treatment program for all women receiving antenatal care (ANC) was established [12]. Pregnant women undergoing initial antenatal care and before delivery are tested for syphilis using two types of serologic tests: treponemal and nontreponemal assays. Pregnant women who first test positive with the nontreponemal test are confirmed with the treponemal test; pregnant women who first test positive with the treponemal test are followed with the nontreponemal test. Discordant results between two types of serologic tests are resolved with a second confirmatory treponemal test. In this program, obstetric care providers collect detailed clinical information on the women diagnosed with syphilis and provide them free treatment and follow-up care until delivery. Although the program has been running for several years, many syphilis-seropositive pregnant women still do not receive timely treatment. We previously reported that one quarter of syphilis-seropositive pregnant women failed to receive any syphilis treatment during pregnancy in Guangzhou, a city with high rates of hospitalized deliveries and high-quality maternal services [13]. At present, few studies have investigated correlates of syphilis treatment among pregnant women in large Chinese cities.

This underlines the need for more research to better understand treatment of syphilis during pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to identify correlates of receiving no treatment or inadequate treatment among pregnant women with syphilis.

Methods

Study design and participants

This retrospective cohort study used data were extracted from the iPMTCT program in China [12]. As part of the iPMTCT program, an obstetric care provider collects and reports basic information and clinical features related to the syphilis diagnosis and obstetric history among all pregnant women newly diagnosed with syphilis. In addition, they, and provide free treatment and follow-up for the syphilis-infected woman until she gives birth.

Between January 2014 and December 2016, 694,894 pregnant women hospitalized for delivery, of which 694,353 were screened for syphilis at delivery, and 635,546 were screened for syphilis during pregnancy. The present study included all syphilis-seropositive pregnant women who were reported to iPMTCT and received prenatal and delivery care in Guangzhou between January 2014 and December 2016 (n = 1,391). Participants who terminated their pregnancy (n = 94), had no treatment information (n = 45), or could not access complete information on outcome (n = 4) were excluded. As a result, a total of 1248 women were included in this analysis (Fig. 1). This study was approved by the Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center Ethics Approval Board (reference number, 2,017,072,601).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow chart of study participants

Outcomes

Syphilis infection was diagnosed by a positive treponemal serological test (either treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)), and a positive non-treponemal test (either toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST) or rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test).

According to national guidelines[12], syphilis-seropositive pregnant women should be provided with free syphilis treatment for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission. Chinese guidelines recommend either benzathine penicillin 2.4 million units intramuscularly per week for three consecutive weeks or procaine penicillin 0.8 million units intramuscularly daily for 15 consecutive days. Ceftriaxone (one gram intravenous or intramuscularly daily for 10 consecutive days) may be used as an alternative to penicillin. For women who are allergic to penicillin, erythromycin (500 milligrams orally four times daily for 15 consecutive days) may be used. Full treatment must be initiated 30 days before delivery to prevent congenital syphilis.

The outcome was the treatment status during pregnancy defined as adequately treated and untreated or inadequately treated, adequate treatment as at least one course of treatment at least 30 days before delivery, and women who completed anything less than one course were defined as receiving no treatment or inadequate treatment.

Exposure factors

Demographic and clinical characteristics of syphilis-seropositive pregnant women were collected by medical professionals using standardized questionnaires. (I) Demographic characteristics included age, education level (middle school or less, high school and higher), occupation (officer or business or service industry, farmer, and unemployed or others or unknown), marital status (first marriage, unmarried, and others). And residence was defined as local (with holding a local residence permit) and migrant (without holding a local residence permit). (II) Previous history included multipara (yes, no), history of adverse pregnancy outcome (yes, no), history of syphilis infection (yes, no). (III) Clinical characteristics on this syphilis infection included syphilis staging (latent, primary, secondary, tertiary), non-treponemal serum test titer (< 1:8 or ≥ 1:8), and gestational age at the time of syphilis diagnosis (< 28weeks or pre-pregnancy, ≥ 28weeks). Fourth, we also collected hospital information about hospital location (hospitals in Yuexiu, Haizhu, Liwan, Tianhe and Huangpu districts were categorized as urban; hospitals in Baiyun and Panyu districts were categorized as suburban; hospitals in Huadu, Conghua, Zengcheng & Nansha districts were categorized as rural), hospital administrative level (township, district, municipal/provincial), and type of diagnosing hospital (public hospital, private hospital).

We compared women with and without an adequately treated according to exposure factors status (age, education level, occupation, marital status, residence, multipara, history of adverse pregnancy outcome, history of syphilis infection, syphilis staging, non-treponemal serum test titer, gestational age at the time of syphilis diagnosis, hospital location, hospital administrative level, and type of diagnosing hospital).

Statistical analysis

The screening rate analysis uses the number of all hospital births in Guangzhou, and the analysis of treatment factors is the number of pregnant women infected with syphilis in Guangzhou who were born or gave birth. Syphilis screening rate during pregnancy was calculated as the number of women in labor who had received syphilis tests during pregnancy divided by total number of women in labor. Syphilis screening rate at delivery was calculated as the number of women in labor who had received syphilis tests at delivery divided by total number of women in labor. The rate of untreated or inadequately treated syphilis was calculated as the number of pregnant women with untreated or inadequately treated syphilis during pregnancy divided by the total number of pregnant women with syphilis at delivery.

Descriptive analyses were used to describe the distributions in socio-demographic characteristics of study participants. T-tests were used to analyze continuous variables. Chi-square tests were used to summarize and compare categorical socio-demographic information and clinical characteristics participants with different treatment statuses and with different residence categories. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze correlates of receiving no treatment or inadequate treatment among syphilis-seropositive pregnant women, all factors (age, residence, marital status, education, multipara status, history of adverse pregnancy outcome, history of syphilis infection, current staging of syphilis infection, non-treponemal serum test titer, location of diagnosing hospital, type of diagnosing hospital, and grade of diagnosing hospital) are entered into the model. When the analysis was restricted to women diagnosed with syphilis before 28 gestational weeks of pregnancy, the logistic regression model used a backward approach. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

A causal mediation analysis [14] was used to explore the potential mediating role of time of syphilis diagnosis in the relationship between individual variables and receiving no treatment or inadequate treatment. The method allows for the decomposition of the total effect into direct and indirect (mediated through time of syphilis diagnose) components, while incorporating possible variable - time to syphilis diagnosis interactions. When the indirect effect was in the same direction as the total effect, the proportion (percentage) of the indirect effect was also calculated. We included time to syphilis diagnosis as a potential mediator and receiving untreated or inadequately treatment (1 = yes, 0 = no) as a separate outcome variable.

All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, USA). Significance was set as α = 0.05.

Results

Syphilis screening in pregnant women

The syphilis screening rate during pregnancy increased between 2014 and 2016 (87.03%, 91.91%, 95.26). However, the syphilis screening rate at delivery remained above 99.9% (99.91%, 99.93%, 99.92%). The rate of receiving no or inadequate treatment for syphilis decreased from 35% to 2014 to 27% in 2016 (Fig. S1).

Participant information

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 1248 included participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 30.3 ± 6.0 years old. The majority of the participants were migrants (70.5%), married (79.5%), had middle school education level or below (54.6%), unemployed (51.9%), diagnosed in a public hospital (94.0%), and diagnosed with syphilis before 28 weeks gestation (67.2%). Overall, the rate of untreated or inadequately treated syphilis during pregnancy was 304 per 1000 syphilis-seropositive pregnant women (379/1248), and 82.1% of untreated or inadequately treated women were migrants. The percentage of untreated or inadequately treatment was higher in pregnant women who were migrants (35.3%), diagnosed at later gestational age (78.5%), with middle school or less education (35.1%), with higher parity (37.3%) and unmarried (50.0%) (Table 1). Among 1248 included participants, 81.2% of patients diagnosed before presentation for delivery, 18.8% of participants were diagnosed at or after delivery. Of 379 untreated or inadequately treated syphilis-seropositive pregnant women, 309 (81.5%) women did not any treatment for syphilis before delivery and 235 (62.0%) women were diagnosed at or after delivery.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of syphilis-seropositive pregnant women with treatment or treatment failure during pregnancy in Guangzhou, China, 2014–2016 (N = 1248)

Variable Women with untreated or inadequately treated
N(%)
Women with adequately treated
N(%)
Total
N(%)
P-valuea
Number 379 (30.4) 869 (69.6) 1248
Age in years, mean ± SD 30.2 ± 6.4 30.4 ± 5.7 30.3 ± 6.0 0.488b
Residence < 0.001
 Local 68 (18.5) 300 (81.5) 368 (29.5)
 Migrant 311 (35.3) 569 (64.7) 880 (70.5)
Marital status < 0.001
 First marriage 263 (26.5) 729 (73.5) 992 (79.5)
 Unmarried 71 (50.0) 71 (50.0) 142 (11.4)
 Others 45 (39.5) 69 (60.5) 114 (9.1)
Education < 0.001
 Middle school or less 239 (35.1) 442 (64.9) 681 (54.6)
 High school and higher 100 (21.7) 362 (78.4) 462 (37.0)
 Unknown 40 (38.1) 65 (61.9) 105 (8.4)
Occupation < 0.001
 Officer / Business / Service industry 25 (15.3) 138 (84.7) 163 (13.1)
 Farmer 41 (26.3) 115 (73.7) 156 (12.5)
 Unemployed or Others or Unknown 313 (33.7) 616 (66.3) 929 (74.4)
Multipara < 0.001
 No 78 (17.9) 359 (82.2) 437 (35.0)
 Yes 300 (37.3) 505 (62.7) 805 (64.5)
 Unknown 1 (16.7) 5 (83.3) 6 (0.5)
History of adverse pregnancy outcome 0.020
 No 316 (31.9) 674 (68.1) 990 (79.3)
 Yes 63 (24.4) 195 (75.6) 258 (20.7)
History of syphilis infection < 0.001
 No 267 (35.2) 492 (64.8) 759 (60.8)
 Yes 112 (22.9) 377 (77.1) 489 (39.2)
Time of syphilis diagnose (gestational age, weeks)
 < 28w or pre-pregnancy 58 (6.9) 781 (93.1) 839 (67.2)
 ≥ 28w 321 (78.5) 88 (21.5) 409 (32.8)
Current staging of syphilis infection 0.125
 Latent 302 (29.9) 708 (70.1) 1010 (80.9)
 Primary / Secondary / Tertiary 18 (24.0) 57 (76.0) 75 (6.0)
 Unknown 59 (36.2) 104 (63.8) 163 (13.1)
Non-treponemal serum test titer 0.001
 < 1:8 297 (28.4) 750 (71.6) 1047 (83.9)
 ≥ 1:8 69 (39.0) 108 (61.0) 177 (14.2)
 Unknown 13 (54.2) 11 (45.8) 24 (1.9)
Location of diagnosing hospital 0.002
Urban 107 (25.9) 306 (74.1) 413 (33.1)
 Suburban 157 (36.4) 274 (63.6) 431 (34.5)
 Rural 115 (28.5) 289 (71.5) 404 (32.4)
Type of diagnosing hospital < 0.001
 Public 341 (29.1) 832 (70.9) 1173 (94.0)
 Private 38 (50.7) 37 (49.3) 75 (6.0)
Grade of diagnosing hospital < 0.001
 Township 122 (40.7) 178 (59.3) 300 (24.0)
 District 103 (27.8) 267 (72.2) 370 (29.7)
 Municipal / Provincial 154 (26.6) 424 (73.4) 578 (46.3)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.

a: Chi-square tests; b: T-test;

Factors influencing treatment of syphilis during pregnancy

The associations between participants characteristics and untreated or inadequately treatment were further explored via multivariable logistic regression. The results are shown in Table 2. Odds of untreated or inadequately treatment were higher among migrant participants (adjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.25–2.73), multiparous participants (adjusted OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 2.51–5.50), unmarried participants (adjusted OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.97–5.28) and unemployed participants (adjusted OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.41–4.39). Participants who with history of syphilis infection (adjusted OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42–0.82) and with high school and higher education participants (adjusted OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.97) were less likely to receive untreated or inadequately treatment. Pregnant women delivering across different location of diagnosing hospital (rural, suburban and urban areas) or different grade or different type of diagnosing hospital have similar rates of receiving untreated or inadequately treatment. The difference in rates of receiving untreated or inadequately treatment between the different current staging of syphilis infection and between the different non-treponemal serum test titers were not significant.

Table 2.

Variables associated with receiving untreated or inadequately treatment for maternal syphilis

Variables OR (95% CI) P-value Adjusted ORa (95% CI) P-value
Age 0.98(0.95-1.00) 0.086 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.410
Residence status
 Local reference reference
 Migrant 3.91 (2.60–6.09) < 0.001 1.83 (1.25–2.73) 0.003
Marital status
 First marriage reference reference
 Unmarried 3.15(2.18–4.53) < 0.001 3.21 (1.97–5.28) < 0.001
 Others 2.08(1.36–3.12) 0.001 1.26 (0.75–2.08) 0.372
Education
 Middle school or less reference reference
 High school and higher 0.48 (0.34–0.66) < 0.001 0.69 (0.49–0.97) 0.033
Occupation
 Officer / Business / Service industry reference reference
 Farmer 2.23 (1.21–4.25) 0.012 1.74 (0.89–3.50) 0.109
 Unemployed / Others / Unknown 3.15 (1.92–5.46) < 0.001 2.43 (1.41–4.39) 0.002
Multipara
 No reference reference
 Yes 2.66 (1.87–3.83) < 0.001 3.68 (2.51–5.50) < 0.001
History of adverse pregnancy outcome
 No reference reference
 Yes 0.60(0.39–0.89) 0.014 0.66 (0.44–0.98) 0.045
History of syphilis infection
 No reference reference
 Yes 0.42 (0.30–0.59) < 0.001 0.59 (0.42–0.82) 0.002
Current staging of syphilis infection
 Latent reference reference
 Primary / Secondary / Tertiary 0.74 (0.38–1.37) 0.363 1.15 (0.79–1.66) 0.478
Non-treponemal serum test titer
 < 1:8 reference reference
 ≥ 1:8 1.34 (0.94–1.89) 0.108 1.15(0.79–1.66) 0.477
Location of diagnosing hospital
 Urban reference reference
 Suburban 1.74 (1.20–2.55) 0.004 1.19 (0.81–1.76) 0.374
 Rural 1.07 (0.72–1.58) 0.746 0.87 (0.58–1.30) 0.495
Type of diagnosing hospital
 Public reference reference
 Private 2.64 (1.47–4.74) 0.001 1.45 (0.74–2.85) 0.275
Grade of diagnosing hospital
 Township reference reference
 District 0.50 (0.33–0.75) < 0.001 0.72 (0.46–1.13) 0.148
 Municipal / Provincial 0.49 (0.34–0.71) < 0.001 0.77 (0.51–1.18) 0.229

Abbreviations: OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals

a: Adjusted for age, residence, marital status, education, multipara status, history of adverse pregnancy outcome, history of syphilis infection, current staging of syphilis infection, non-treponemal serum test titer, location of diagnosing hospital, type of diagnosing hospital, and grade of diagnosing hospital.

The mediating role of syphilis diagnosis time

There is a close relationship between gestational age of syphilis diagnosis and inadequacy of treatment, because women diagnosed at delivery or less than 30 days before delivery cannot by definition receive adequate treatment. We found that 307 (81.0%) of the 379 untreated or inadequately treated patients were diagnosed within 30 days before delivery, and that the timing of diagnosis was probably the most direct factor affecting treatment. We therefore restricted the time of diagnosis to before 28 gestational weeks for the analysis, and by backward, the final model retained the inclusion of only one factor - residence (OR = 5.42, 95% CI: 2.13–18.33). A mediated analysis of the timing of syphilis diagnosis during pregnancy was carried out. The indirect effect is in the same direction as the total effect of untreated or inadequately treatment, indicating that the relationship between various factors and untreated or inadequately treatment is mediated by the time of diagnosis of syphilis, which we observed to be significantly mediated by the timing of syphilis diagnosis. (Fig. 2) The positive association between residence status and untreated or inadequately treated (total effect) was partially mediated by the proportion of total effect mediated by the indirect effect of time to syphilis diagnosis, which was 62.6%, with a direct effect is greater than 1 (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.08–5.32). The positive association between the marital status, multipara, occupation and untreated or inadequately treatment (total effect) was fully mediated by the indirect effect of syphilis diagnosis time, the direct effect being close to 1. The negative association between the education, history of syphilis infection and untreated or inadequately treatment (total effect) was entirely mediated by the indirect effect of syphilis diagnosis time, with a direct effect also close to 1 (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.47–1.51 and OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.55–1.81 respectively).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Mediation effect of syphilis diagnose time on the correlates of receiving nontreatment or inadequate treatment. Adjusted for residence, marital status, occupation, education status, multipara, history of syphilis infection. Abbreviations: OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals

Factors related to treatment status for syphilis in pregnancy for migrants

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between local and migrant participants (Table S1). Differences between local and migrant participants were observed in marital status, education, occupation, history of syphilis infection, time of syphilis diagnose, location/type, and grade of diagnosing hospital (all P < 0.05). This includes migrant women who are more likely to be diagnosed at ≥ 28 weeks of gestation and in private hospitals, etc.

Among local participants, multiparous women (adjusted OR = 5.69, 95% CI: 2.20–17.15), and women’s occupation unknown (adjusted OR = 7.02, 95% CI: 1.86–46.42) were more likely to receiving untreated or inadequately treatment. As an exception, a marginally significant lower was observed between without or with history of syphilis infection (adjusted OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18–0.79). Among migrant participants, odds of receiving untreated or inadequately treatment were higher among multiparous participants (adjusted OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 2.24–5.28), unmarried participants (adjusted OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.95–5.66) and unemployed participants (adjusted OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.09–3.80). Participants who with history of syphilis infection (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45–0.96) and with high school and higher education participants (adjusted OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42–0.91) were less likely to receive untreated or inadequately treatment. (Table S2)

As shown in A of Fig. 3 shows the rate of untreated or inadequately treated syphilis during pregnancy in pregnant women in 11 districts of Guangzhou. The rates of untreated or inadequately treated syphilis were lower in districts of Yuexiu, Huadu and Conghua, and vary among urban, suburban and rural hospitals (25.91%, 36.43%, 28.47%, p = 0.0024). B shows the proportion of migrants infected with syphilis during pregnancy in 11 districts of Guangzhou. These districts (i.e. Baiyun, Huangpu & Nansha) appears to be with a higher proportion of migrants infected with syphilis.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Rate of untreated or inadequately treated syphilis and the proportion of migrants in women infected with syphilis during pregnancy by districts. A. Rate of untreated or inadequately treated syphilis during pregnancy in pregnant women by districts. B. The proportion of migrants in women infected with syphilis during pregnancy by districts. The circles were not line up with geographical boundaries

Discussion

This study examined correlates of syphilis treatment among pregnant women in Guangzhou. We found that women who were migrants, multiparous, unmarried, unemployed, with low educational attainment and without history of syphilis infection were more likely to receive no or inadequate treatment, and that the impact of all these factors (except for the migrants) on treatment status are fully mediated through the timing of syphilis diagnosis. Furthermore, not receiving treatment or inadequate treatment was not significantly associated with hospital and current syphilis characteristics. Additionally, we found the syphilis screening rate increased and the rate of untreated or inadequately treated syphilis during pregnancy decreased over time.

We observed that one third of pregnant women with syphilis in Guangzhou did receive no treatment or inadequate treatment. This may be related to delayed screening, as multiple factors lead to non-treatment due to syphilis being diagnosed later than 28 weeks of pregnancy. Delayed or absent antenatal care was common among women with syphilis. Around 56% of women with maternal syphilis were identified during pregnancy and more than 40% were diagnosed at delivery or postpartum period [9]. This suggests an opportunity for earlier syphilis screening in pregnancy.

Residence status can affect treatment status partly independently of the time of syphilis diagnosis, leading to non-treatment. Our data suggest migrant women were more likely to be diagnosed ≥ 28 weeks of gestation. This may reflect migrant women have delayed syphilis screening compared to local pregnant women. In China, the residence permit system is usually associated with local health care and social security [15]. There is a correlation between residence permit and health inequality [16, 17]. However, most pregnant women infected with syphilis are without holding a local residence permit in Guangzhou [13]. Many internal migrant women in China do not receive adequate prenatal care. China has a large domestic migrant population and a Chinese study examined their use of antenatal care and the factors influencing this using data from a large national survey of the migrant population. This study examined demographics and migration experiences as predictors of early pregnancy antenatal care and adequate antenatal visits. It was found that 12.6% of migrant women reported no check-ups in the first trimester, 27.6% had fewer than five antenatal visits during their most recent pregnancy and 12.3% had three or fewer prenatal visits, and demographic predictors of delayed and inadequate care included lower levels of education, lower income and lack of maternity insurance. [18] Migrant women with syphilis had less education and higher levels of unemployment. However, in addition to the late diagnosis of syphilis, there may be other peculiarities in migrant women that lead to their inadequate treatment. Policy implementation and supervision may need to be strengthened to guarantee syphilis screening at the first prenatal visit.

Most pregnant women infected with syphilis are migrants in Guangzhou [13], increasing the importance of understanding syphilis services for both temporary migrants, permanent migrants, and other transient people. In May 2019, a global action plan was agreed at the 72nd World Health Assembly, which seeks to establish a “framework of priorities and guiding principles… to promote the health of refugees and migrants”. The plan includes short- and long-term steps to mainstream migrant health care; enhance partnerships; strengthen health monitoring and information systems and counter misperceptions about migrant health [19]. With the continuous development of reform and opening up and economy, the number of migrants in Guangzhou has increased rapidly, reaching 5.52 million, accounting for about one third of the total population [20]. There may be a need for policy or advocacy for earlier syphilis screening and for precise management of treatment for non-local residence permit migrant women with syphilis.

Our data also suggest that migrant syphilis-seropositive pregnant women were more likely to be diagnosed in a private hospital. Previous literature shows that pregnant women attending private ANC clinics receive fewer STD services [21]. Among the 6% of syphilis infected pregnant women seeking ANC in private hospitals, 50.7% received no or inadequate treatment. However, we did not find that participants diagnosed in private hospitals were more likely to be untreated or inadequately treated syphilis. Given the current expansion of private healthcare and increasing government investment in primary care in China, more women may receive prenatal care at private hospitals in the coming years [22]. Comprehensive strategies to promote high-quality prenatal services may also needed in private hospitals.

Maternity and marital status can affect treatment status leading to non-treatment. Previous studies have indicated that grand multipara women were received lesser antenatal care, and had more adverse pregnancy compared to the primipara [23]. One Portuguese study aim to evaluate the adequacy of prenatal care according to the family structure (single motherhood vs. two-parent family) in a population with free universal access to prenatal care [24]. It was based on 8001 mothers from the Portuguese birth cohort Geração XXI, and a questionnaire was administered to women between 24 and 72 h after delivery at the public maternity hospital in Porto, Portugal, between April 2005 and August 2006. It was found that 5.5% (n = 438) were single mothers, that single mothers were more likely to have an unplanned pregnancy (OR = 4.55; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.76) and that the frequency of private antenatal care was significantly lower among single mothers (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.79) [24]. Perhaps more attention needs to be paid to these two groups in addition to the current implementation of the policy, with increased awareness or policy emphasis on the importance of maternity testing and syphilis treatment for them.

However, this study did not find that the grade, type, and region of the hospital caused individual syphilis treatment to be affected, and our screening rates have been consistently high, so potentially indicating that all hospital consultations are uniform and standardized, with no hospital variation. Also, the clinical information on syphilis at current diagnosis does not correlate with treatment status. Therefore, other factors may need to be explored to reduce the untreated rate.

This study has several limitations. First, the dataset for this study was obtained using the administrative systems and there is likely some misclassification bias [25]. Second, we only included data from a single large city, which is the provincial hub and has more resources and better infrastructure for screening and treating syphilis in pregnancy than most other settings in China. Syphilis-seropositive pregnant women who delivered outside of Guangzhou were not included, making our results an over-estimate of treatment rates. Additionally, we do not have access to the exact timing of the first prenatal visit. However, the guidelines state that STD testing should be performed at the first antenatal visit and delayed testing likely reflects delays in first prenatal visit. Our analysis could not differentiate whether pregnant women were diagnosed at the time of delivery or earlier in the pregnancy.

This study has several research and policy implications. Further implementation research is needed to improve screening and expand treatment. Quality improvement measures to enhance early syphilis testing among all women should be further investigated. Comprehensive strategies to promote high-quality prenatal services are needed in migrant women with non-local residence permit.

Conclusion

Women without holding a local residence permit and women diagnosed later in pregnancy were less likely to receive syphilis treatment during pregnancy. Our data suggest many pregnant women slip through the cracks of the existing ANC system, providing actionable elements for health service interventions, and greater efforts are needed to eliminate disparities in syphilis treatment due to the residence permit system.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12939_2023_1866_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22.7KB, docx)

Supplementary Material Table S1 Baseline characteristics of syphilis-seropositive pregnant women with different residence in Guangzhou, China, 2014-2016 (N=1248)

12939_2023_1866_MOESM2_ESM.docx (20.3KB, docx)

Supplementary Material Table S2 Variables associated with receiving untreated or inadequately treatment for maternal syphilis in different residence status

12939_2023_1866_MOESM3_ESM.docx (199.3KB, docx)

Supplementary Material Fig. S1 Syphilis screening rate in pregnant women and syphilis prevalence in pregnant women

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Thomas Fitzpatrick of Institute for Global Health & Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Yingyi Lin of Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia & British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, for their language polishing and modification, and grateful to the obstetric care providers who have assisted the implementation of the IPMTCT program.

Abbreviations

ANC

Antenatal Care

iPMTCT

Integrated Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission

SD

Standard deviation

OR

Odds ratio

CI

Confidence intervals

Authors’ contributions

XQ, WT and JT conceived and designed the study, and drafted the manuscript. HL, NC conceived and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. SS, JH analyzed and interpreted the data. JY, HX, and XZ collected, assembled, and interpreted the data. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC2702903), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82173525), Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2022B1515120080) and Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission (Grant No. 2023A031001). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangzhou Municipality.

( http://www.gzmed.gov.cn/rhingzmed/xxgk/xxgkzn/25769.html ) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangzhou Municipality.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center Ethics Approval Board (No. 2017072601). The data was anonymised and subsequently, consent requirement was waived by the Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center Ethics Approval Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Huihui Liu and Niannian Chen contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Gomez GB, Kamb ML, Newman LM, Mark J, Broutet N, Hawkes SJ. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(3):217–26. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.107623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hong F, Wu X, Yang F, Lan L, Guan Y, Zhang C, Feng T, Yang Y, Yin Y, Yu W. Risk of congenital syphilis following treatment of maternal syphilis: results of a congenital syphilis control program in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(4):588–94. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Korenromp EL, Rowley J, Alonso M, Mello MB, Wijesooriya NS, Mahiane SG, Ishikawa N, Le LV, Newman-Owiredu M, Nagelkerke N, et al. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes-estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0211720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In.:World Health Organization; 2019.
  • 5.Wijesooriya NS, Rochat RW, Kamb ML, Turlapati P, Temmerman M, Broutet N, Newman LM. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis in 2008 and 2012: a health systems modelling study. The Lancet Global Health. 2016;4(8):e525–33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30135-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mabey DC, Sollis KA, Kelly HA, Benzaken AS, Bitarakwate E, Changalucha J, Chen XS, Yin YP, Garcia PJ, Strasser S, et al. Point-of-care tests to strengthen health systems and save newborn lives: the case of syphilis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Watson-Jones D, Gumodoka B, Weiss H, Changalucha J, Todd J, Mugeye K, Buvé A, Kanga Z, Ndeki L, Rusizoka M, et al. Syphilis in pregnancy in Tanzania. II. The effectiveness of antenatal syphilis screening and single-dose benzathine penicillin treatment for the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2002;86(7):948–57. doi: 10.1086/342951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Joseph Davey DL, Shull HI, Billings JD, Wang D, Adachi K, Klausner JD. Prevalence of Curable sexually transmitted infections in pregnant women in low- and Middle-Income Countries from 2010 to 2015: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(7):450–8. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dou L, Wang X, Wang F, Wang Q, Qiao Y, Su M, Jin X, Qiu J, Song L, Wang A. Epidemic Profile of Maternal Syphilis in China in 2013. Biomed Res Int 2016, 2016:9194805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Torres RG, Mendonça ALN, Montes GC, Manzan JJ, Ribeiro JU, Paschoini MC. Syphilis in pregnancy: the reality in a Public Hospital. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(2):90–6. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Townsend CL, Francis K, Peckham CS, Tookey PA. Syphilis screening in pregnancy in the United Kingdom, 2010–2011: a national surveillance study. BJOG. 2017;124(1):79–86. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Integrated prevention of. Mother-to-child transmission for human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis and hepatitis B virus in China. In.: China National Health Commission; 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Liu H, Chen N, Yu J, Tang W, He J, Xiao H, Lin S, Hu F, Feng Q, Tucker JD, et al. Syphilis-attributable adverse pregnancy outcomes in China: a retrospective cohort analysis of 1187 pregnant women with different syphilis treatment. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3896-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Valeri L, Vanderweele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013;18(2):137–50. doi: 10.1037/a0031034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Song Q, Smith JP. Hukou system, mechanisms, and health stratification across the life course in rural and urban China. Health Place. 2019;58:102150. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guo J, Guan L, Fang L, Liu C, Fu M, He H, Wang X. Depression among Chinese older adults: a perspective from Hukou and health inequities. J Affect Disord. 2017;223:115–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jiang H, Burstrom B, Chen J, Burstrom K. Rural-Urban Inequalities in Poor Self-Rated Health, Self-Reported Functional Disabilities, and Depression among Chinese Older Adults: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2011 and 2015.Int J Environ Res Public Health2021, 18(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Zong Z, Huang J, Sun X, Mao J, Shu X, Hearst N. Prenatal care among rural to urban migrant women in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1934-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.World Health Assembly Update. In. World Health Organization; 27 May 2019.
  • 20.Howe CG, Cox B, Fore R, Jungius J, Kvist T, Lent S, Miles HE, Salas LA, Rifas-Shiman S, Starling AP, et al. Maternal gestational diabetes Mellitus and Newborn DNA methylation: findings from the pregnancy and Childhood Epigenetics Consortium. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(1):98–105. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen L, Dai Y, Zhang Y, Wu Q, Rudan D, Saftic V, van Velthoven MH, Su J, Tan Z, Scherpbier RW. A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China. Croatian Med J. 2013;54(2):146–56. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yip W, Hsiao W. Harnessing the privatisation of China’s fragmented health-care delivery. Lancet (London England) 2014;384(9945):805–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61120-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.incim Bezircioglu NYG, Ali Balo¤lu Y, Baydar The effect of grand multiparity on maternal, obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes. Perinat J. 2013;21(1):17–22. doi: 10.2399/prn.13.0211012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martins S, Pinto SSE, Barros H. Single motherhood and prenatal care utilisation.BMJ Journals ADC Fetal & Neonatal Edition2011, 96(Suppl 1).
  • 25.Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer SE, Gregory EC. Measuring gestational age in vital Statistics Data: transitioning to the Obstetric Estimate. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Natl Vital Stat Syst. 2015;64(5):1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12939_2023_1866_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22.7KB, docx)

Supplementary Material Table S1 Baseline characteristics of syphilis-seropositive pregnant women with different residence in Guangzhou, China, 2014-2016 (N=1248)

12939_2023_1866_MOESM2_ESM.docx (20.3KB, docx)

Supplementary Material Table S2 Variables associated with receiving untreated or inadequately treatment for maternal syphilis in different residence status

12939_2023_1866_MOESM3_ESM.docx (199.3KB, docx)

Supplementary Material Fig. S1 Syphilis screening rate in pregnant women and syphilis prevalence in pregnant women

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangzhou Municipality.

( http://www.gzmed.gov.cn/rhingzmed/xxgk/xxgkzn/25769.html ) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangzhou Municipality.


Articles from International Journal for Equity in Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES