Abstract
Background
Successful regenerative medicine strategies need the manipulation and control of macrophages’ phenotypic switching. Our previous study indicated that rat and porcine adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles could successfully promote soft tissue repair. However, whether human adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles (h-sEV-AT) showed the same ability to promote soft tissue regeneration and whether adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles (sEV-AT) contribute to modulating the polarization of macrophages were unknown.
Methods
In this study, we, for the first time, isolated h-sEV-AT from liposuction adipose tissue and characterized the morphology, size distribution, and marker protein. In vitro, we treated adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs), endothelial cells (ECs), and M1 macrophages with h-sEV-AT. In vivo, the ability of h-sEV-AT to promote soft tissue regeneration and polarize macrophages was investigated.
Results
The results indicated that h-sEV-AT possessed the characteristics of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs). In vitro, an obvious increase in adipogenesis and angiogenesis was induced by h-sEV-AT. In vivo, h-sEV-AT successfully induced the regeneration of adipose tissue and effectively accelerated full-thickness skin wound healing. Besides, we found that h-sEV-AT showed the ability to increase the percentage of M2 macrophages both in vivo and in vitro, which had been reported to contribute to tissue repair and regeneration.
Conclusions
Taken together, these results suggested that h-sEV-AT showed the ability to induce soft tissue repair supported by not only the differentiation of ASCs and ECs but also the polarization of macrophages. Considering the abundant sources, high yield, and guaranteed effectiveness, this study provided a cell-free strategy for soft tissue regeneration that directly isolated small extracellular vesicles from human liposuction adipose tissue.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-023-03306-7.
Keywords: Human adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles, Adipose tissue regeneration, Skin wound healing, Macrophage polarization
Background
Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), released from different cells and tissues, were considered a new additive biomaterial through the transport of multiple proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids [1–5]. They have been extensively studied in various fields as therapeutic targets, diagnosis tools, drug delivery vectors, and inducers of tissue regeneration [4]. For soft tissue regeneration, sEVs have been reported to recruit host cells, regulate immune responses, stimulate angiogenesis, and promote tissue repair or regeneration [6–8].
Cell-free induced tissue regeneration began with immediate adsorption of a large number of host proteins to the surface of the implants, followed by rapid neutrophil infiltration and activation. Then, tissue-surrounding macrophages and circulating monocytes entered the implants to engulf and digest the foreign body [9]. All these host reactions made up the immune response that evoked the regeneration process. If the immune response was well controlled, the regenerated tissue will be architecture-morphological equivalency to normal tissue. However, if the immune response was uncontrolled and dysregulated, the host response always ended with chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and even necrosis of tissues [10]. With all stages, macrophages exhibit extraordinary plasticity [11].
Macrophage phenotypes were generally defined as pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, respectively [12]. M1 macrophages promoted inflammatory response with intensive releasing of pro-inflammatory factors, like interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). In contrast, M2 macrophages antagonized M1 macrophages’ responses and reduced inflammatory response by releasing anti-inflammatory factors, like interleukin 4 (IL-4), interleukin 13 (IL-13), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), and interleukin 10 (IL-10), functioning in tissue regeneration and remodeling [11, 12].
Our previous study has shown that rat and porcine adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles effectively promoted soft tissue regeneration [13–16]. However, whether small extracellular vesicles could be isolated from human liposuction adipose tissue and whether it also showed effectiveness on soft tissue were unknown. Besides, the role of sEV-AT in guiding macrophage polarization was elusive.
In this study, we, for the first time, isolated h-sEV-AT from liposuction adipose tissue and investigated the differentiation of ASCs and ECs induced by h-sEV-AT. In vivo, the effect of h-sEV-AT on rat adipose tissue regeneration and full-thickness skin wound were evaluated. Besides, the polarization of macrophages induced by adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles was also investigated here.
Methods
h-sEV-AT isolation and characterization
Subcutaneous adipose tissue was collected from the abdomen of four healthy females (age, 25 ± 5 years, body mass index [BMI]: 19–22) after obtaining their consent. All participants agreed to offer their liposuction tissue and were informed of the procedures and purpose of the study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University. The approval number was WCHSIRB-CT-2022–281. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), adipose tissue was cut into small pieces and transferred into a flask to culture for 2 days. Then, the supernatant was collected, filtered, and concentrated. The concentrated extract medium was mixed with 0.5 volume of Total Exosome Isolation™ reagent (Life Technologies, USA), incubated overnight at 4 °C, and spun down at 10,000 g, 4 °C for 1 h. The pellet was resuspended in PBS for further experiments.
The isolated h-sEV-AT was visualized using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, USA) by negative staining. The particle size and size distribution of h-sEV-AT were determined by Zeta View analysis system (Particle Metrix, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The marker proteins were detected by Western blot according to our previous methods [13, 16]. Briefly, 30 μg h-sEV-AT mixed with loading buffer (Solarbio, China), boiled for 10 min, resolved on 10% polyacrylamide gel, and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Primary antibodies, CD81(1:1000, Zen Bioscience, 381296), TSG101(1:1000, Abcam, Ab125011), CD9 (1:1000, Zen Bioscience, 380411), CD63 (1:1000, Zen Bioscience, R23327), GM130(1:1000, Abcam, ab52649), and Actin (1:5000, Abcam, ab179467), were used and followed by Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies. High sig ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Tanon, China) was used for detecting protein signals by ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini machine (GE Healthcare, USA).
h-sEV-AT labeling and cellular uptake
ASCs and ECs were prepared and cultured exactly as described previously [13]. For cellular uptake, 100 μg h-sEV-AT, dissolved in 1 ml culture medium, were labeled with 1 μg membrane-labeling dye DiO (Life Tech, V22886) for 30 min, re-purified with the Total Exosome Isolation™ reagent (Life Technologies, USA) to remove the unincorporated dye. The obtained DiO-labeled h-sEV-AT pellet was cultured with ASCs or ECs for 6 h, respectively. These labeled cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with phalloidin (1:200, Invitrogen, A34055-300U) and DAPI (1:1000, Solarbio, C0050), washed with PBS, and imaged by confocal microscopy (Olympus FV1000, Japan).
Cell differentiation induced by h-sEV-AT
ASCs were seeded into 24-well plates with a density of 1 × 105 per well, and continuously cultured with 0.5 ml culture medium containing 50 μg h-sEV-AT. The culture medium only was considered as the blank group. The culture medium was changed every 2 days to maintain the treatment effect. After culturing ASCs with h-sEV-AT for 10 days, the relative expression of adipogenic genes (PPARγ, C/EBPα, adiponectin, and FABP4) was analyzed by real-time PCR and primer sequences are listed in Table 1 (n = 3). After culturing for 16 days, lipid clusters were stained with oil red O and imaged by an inverted microscope (Olympus DP80, Japan) (n = 3).
Table 1.
Target cDNA | Primer sequence (5′–3′) |
---|---|
Rat-GAPDH |
TATGACTCTACCCACGGCAAG TACTCAGCACCAGCATCACC |
Rat-PPARγ2 |
GCCCTTTGGTGACTTTATGGAG GCAGCAGGTTGTCTTGGATGT |
Rat-C/EBPα |
GCCAAGAAGTCGGTGGATAAGA GTCACTGGTCAACTCCAACACCT |
Rat-Adiponectin |
CGTTCTCTTCACCTACGACCAGT ATTGTTGTCCCCTTCCCCATAC |
Rat-FABP4 |
GTAGAAGGGGACTTGGTCGTCAT ACTTTCCTGTCATCTGGGGTGA |
Rat-CD31 |
CCAGGTGCTATTCTATAAGGACGATGC TGGAAGACCCGAGACTGAGGAATG |
Rat-VEGF |
GGAGAGGAGCCCGCCAAGG GCAGTAAAGCCAGGGTCCAGTG |
Rat-FGF2 |
GAGCGACCCACACGTCAAACTAC CAGCCGTCCATCTTCCTTCATAGC |
Rat-Angiogenin |
GATGAGCCTGCGTCCTCTGTTG ATCTGGCATCCCGACCCTTGG |
Mouse-GAPDH |
AAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAGGCATC CGGCATCGAAGGTGGAAGAGTG |
Mouse-IL-6 |
CTCTGGGAAATCGTGGAAAT CCAGTTTGGTAGCATCCATC |
Mouse-IL-1β |
ATCTCGCAGCAGCACATCAA ATGGGAACGTCACACACCAG |
Mouse-TNF-α |
GTGCCAGCCGATGGGTTGTAC TGACGGCAGAGAGGAGGTTGAC |
Mouse-iNOS |
CGGACGAGACGGATAGGCAGAG GGAAGGCAGCGGGCACATG |
Mouse-Arg1 |
AGTGTGGTGCTGGGTGGAGAC GCTGGTTGTCAGGGGAGTGTTG |
Mouse-TGF-β1 |
ATGGTGGACCGCAACAACGC GGCACTGCTTCCCGAATGTCTG |
Mouse-IL-10 |
GAGGATCAGCAGGGGCCAGTAC AAGGCAGTCCGCAGCTCTAGG |
Mouse-CD206 |
TCAATGCCACTGCCATGCCTAC AGCTTGCCGTGCGTCTTGC |
ECs were seeded into 24-well plates with a density of 1 × 105 per well and continuously cultured with 0.5 ml culture medium containing 50 μg h-sEV-AT. The culture medium only was considered as the blank group. The culture medium was changed every 2 days to maintain the treatment effect. After culturing ECs with h-sEV-AT for 4 days, the relative expression of angiogenic genes (CD31, VEGF, FGF2, and angiogenin) was determined by real-time PCR and primer sequences are listed in Table 1 (n = 3). For tube formation, ECs were suspended in the culture medium with h-sEV-AT and seeded into 96-well plates coated with Matrigel (Corning, USA). After incubation for 5 h, images were acquired on an inverted microscope (Olympus DP80, Japan) (n = 3).
Macrophage polarization induced by h-sEV-AT
M0 macrophages (the primary Raw 264.7 cell line) were seeded at 1 × 105 cells per well into 24-well plates and 100 ng/ml LPS (Sigma) was added to induce M1 macrophages. Then, M1 macrophages were continuously cultured with 0.5 ml culture medium containing 50 μg h-sEV-AT. The culture medium only was considered as the blank group. The culture medium was changed every 2 days to maintain the treatment effect. After 4 days of induction, the percentage of M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages was analyzed by immunofluorescence staining (n = 3). The relative expression of M1 marker genes (IL-6, IL-1β, TNFα, and iNOS) and M2 marker genes (Arg1, TGF-β1, IL-10, and CD206) was analyzed by qRT-PCR, and primer sequences are listed in Table 1 (n = 3).
Animal experiments
4-week-old male SD rats (75 ± 10 g, n = 12) were obtained from Dashuo Experimental Animal Co. Ltd. (Chengdu, China). All operations of animals were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committees of the State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University. The approval number was WCHSIRB-D-2020–391.
In the adipose tissue regeneration experiments, 4-week-old male SD rats (75 ± 10 g, n = 4) were under general anesthesia with 1% pentobarbital sodium (10 ml/kg, intraperitoneal injection). Two custom-designed silicone tubes (diameter: 4.87 mm, height: 5 mm) were subcutaneously implanted into the back on each side, which contained 120 μl Matrigel only or 120 μl Matrigel mixed with 720 μg h-sEV-AT. Rats are raised separately. All rats (n = 4) were euthanized via rapid cervical dislocation at 4 weeks, and the samples were harvested for further analysis. No animal was excluded.
In the full-thickness skin wound healing experiments, 4-week-old male SD rats (75 ± 10 g, n = 8) were under general anesthesia by 1% pentobarbital sodium (10 ml/kg, intraperitoneal injection). Two full-thickness skin wounds (20 mm in diameter) were made on each side. 100 μl PBS only or 100 μl PBS containing 600 μg h-sEV-AT were subcutaneously injected around the wounds at 4 points. Rats are raised separately. To ensure the therapeutic effect of sEV-AT, injections were performed once a week. Digital photographs were taken every 4 days until the wounds in one group were completely healed. The wound area between the two groups was significantly different on day 6, so digital photographs at this time point were taken. The wound area was measured using the Image J software. Rats were euthanized on day 8 and day 16, respectively (n = 4 per timepoint), via rapid cervical dislocation, and the samples were harvested for further testing. No animal was excluded.
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining
The samples were harvested and fixed in 4% neutral paraformaldehyde overnight, dehydrated, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned into 5–6 µm thick sections for H&E staining, Masson staining, immunochemical staining, and immunofluorescence staining.
Immunochemical staining
Sections were blocked for 2 h and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Primary antibodies against perilipin A (1:200, Abcam, ab3526) and CD31(1:200, Santa Cruz, sc-376764) were used in this study for analyzing adipocytes and blood vessels. The secondary antibody was shown by the DAB kit (Gene Tech, Shanghai, China). Images were captured by an inverted microscope (Olympus DP80, Japan) (n = 3).
Immunofluorescence staining
Cells or sections were blocked for 2 h and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Primary antibodies against F4/80 (1:200, Abcam, ab240946) and iNOS (1:200, Santa Cruz, sc-7271) or CD206 (1:200, Santa Cruz, sc-58986) were used in this study to analyze M1 and M2 macrophages. The secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse 488 (1:200, Invitrogen, A11008) and goat anti-rabbit 555 (1:200, Invitrogen, A21428) were followed. DAPI (1:1000, Solarbio, C0050) was used to mark the nuclei. Images were captured by confocal microscopy (Olympus FV1000, Japan) using the same imaging threshold and exposure time for each experiment. The number of positive cells per field was calculated with ImageJ software. The results were further analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 software (n = 3).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel or GraphPad Prism 7 software. All results were expressed as mean value ± standard deviation. An unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test was used to determine the level of significance. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Results
Characterization of h-sEV-AT
Human adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles (h-sEV-AT) were isolated from liposuction adipose tissue (Fig. 1A). The morphology of h-sEV-AT was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and the results showed that h-sEV-AT displayed a round shape or a double-membrane spherical structure (Fig. 1B). Western blot analysis confirmed that h-sEV-AT expressed the exosomal proteins (CD81, TSG101, CD9, CD63), and not expressed the cellular proteins (actin and GM130) (Fig. 1C and Additional file 1: Figure S1). Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was used for evaluating the size distribution of h-sEV-AT. The diameter of h-sEV-AT was mainly between 25 and 240 nm and showed certainly homogenous. The peak was 120 nm (Fig. 1D). These results indicated that h-sEV-AT possessed the characteristics of sEVs.
The differentiation of ASCs and ECs induced by h-sEV-AT
To investigate the effect of h-sEV-AT on the differentiation of ASCs and ECs, we first evaluated the cellular uptake of h-sEV-AT by these cells. The results showed that h-sEV-AT could be taken by ASCs (Fig. 2A). After culturing ASCs with h-sEV-AT for 10 days, the expression of adipogenic marker genes (PPARγ2, C/EBPα, adiponectin, and FABP4) was upregulated (Fig. 2B). After culturing for 16 days, there were lipid droplets accumulated in ASCs stained by Oil Red O in the h-sEV-AT group. However, in the blank group, there were no Oil Red O-stained cells (Fig. 2C-2D). Similarly, for angiogenesis, h-sEV-AT could be taken by ECs (Fig. 2E). After culturing ECs with h-sEV-AT for 4 days, the expression of angiogenesis marker genes (CD31, VEGF, FGF2, and angiogenin) was also upregulated by h-sEV-AT compared with that of the blank group (Fig. 2F). Besides, h-sEV-AT could also promote tube-like structures formation in ECs (Fig. 2G-2H). Taken together, h-sEV-AT showed the ability to promote the differentiation of ASCs or ECs, which was similar to that of rat and porcine-derived sEV-AT in our previous study [13].
Macrophage polarization induced by h-sEV-AT
To evaluate the effect of h-sEV-AT on the polarization macrophages, we pre-treated M0 macrophages with 100 ng/ml LPS for 4 h to mimic M1 macrophages, then cultured M1 macrophages with 100 ug/ml h-sEV-AT for 4 days (Fig. 3A). Immunofluorescence staining showed that the percentage of M1 macrophages was decreased and the percentage of M2 macrophages was increased by adding h-sEV-AT. However, in the blank group, most of the cells were M1 macrophages (Fig. 3B-3D). The expression of M1 marker genes (IL-6, IL-1β, TNFα, and iNOS) and M2 maker genes (Arg1, TGF-β1, IL-10, and CD206) was also detected by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the expression of M1 marker genes (IL-6 and TNFα) was decreased and the expression of M2 marker genes (Arg1, TGF-β1, IL-10, and CD206) was significantly increased by h-sEV-AT (Fig. 3E).
Adipose tissue regeneration induced by h-sEV-AT
To evaluate the effectiveness of h-sEV-AT in inducing adipose tissue regeneration, h-sEV-AT, mixed with Matrigel, were transferred into the tube and subcutaneously implanted into the back of SD rats (Fig. 4A). After 4 weeks of implantation, the implants with tube were photographed (Fig. 4B). Then, the tubes were removed, and the implants were isolated. Macroimages showed that the volume of regenerated tissue in the h-sEV-AT group was significantly larger than that in the blank group (Fig. 4C). Immunohistochemical staining with adipocyte marker (perilipin A) indicated that a large number of adipocytes could be detected in the h-sEV-AT group, which was surrounded by a small amount of fiber stained by Masson staining. However, in the blank group, no regenerated adipocyte was detected, and nearly all contents were composed of fibers (Fig. 4D and 4E). These results indicated that h-sEV-AT could successfully promote adipose tissue regeneration within 4 weeks.
Skin wound healing promoted by h-sEV-AT
To further investigate the ability of h-sEV-AT to repair full-thickness skin defects, we subcutaneously injected h-sEV-AT around the wounds at 4 points (Fig. 5A). Digital photographs were taken on day 0, day 4, day 6, day 8, and day 12 and day 16 to measure the closure rate (Fig. 5B). Pattern graph was made to indicate the speed of wound closure more clearly. The dotted circle represented the scope of the initial wound, and the colored part represented the area of the unhealed wound at different time points (Fig. 5C). By calculating the percentage of the wound area, the results showed that h-sEV-AT could effectively accelerate skin wound healing (Fig. 5D). In microstructure, wounded skins were collected at day 8 followed by H&E staining and immunohistochemical staining and collected at day 16 followed by Masson staining. Compared with the blank group, the re-epithelialization was significantly accelerated by subcutaneous injection of h-sEV-AT. The edge of re-epithelialization was pointed by red inverted triangles (Fig. 6A). Besides, CD31-stained blood vessels were denser and more mature in the h-sEV-AT group than that in the blank group on day 8 (Fig. 6B-6C). Moreover, Masson staining showed that the collagen was irregular in the h-sEV-AT group on day 16. In addition, the regenerated hair follicles indicated by the red arrows could also be observed in the h-sEV-AT group (Fig. 6D-6E). These results indicated that h-sEV-AT could accelerate the healing of full-thickness skin wounds both in the macro- and microstructure.
Macrophage phenotypes induced by h-sEV-AT in vivo
To further investigate the influence of h-sEV-AT on macrophage phenotypes in vivo, we evaluated the percentage of M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages both in the adipose tissue regeneration and the full-thickness skin wound healing. F4/80+iNOS+ cells and F4/80+CD206+ cells were identified as M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages, respectively. For adipose tissue regeneration induced by h-sEV-AT, at 4 weeks, there were more CD206+ signals in the h-sEV-AT group but fewer iNOS+ signals compared with that in the blank group (Fig. 7A). The percentage of M1 macrophages was only 18.21% but the percentage of M2 macrophages was up to 75.9% in the h-sEV-AT group (Fig. 7B). Besides, we evaluated the ratio of M2/M1 and the result indicated that h-sEV-AT could increase the ratio from 0.19 to 3.76 (Fig. 7C), which had been reported to contribute to tissue regeneration directly [17]. A similar phenomenon also occurred in full-thickness skin wound healing. h-sEV-AT successfully increased the percentage of M2 macrophages and the ratio of M2/M1 at day 8 (Fig. 8). Taken together, h-sEV-AT showed the ability to decrease the percentage of M1 macrophages and increase the percentage of M2 macrophages both in vivo and in vitro, which could cooperate with its role in inducing differentiation of ASCs and ECs and jointly promoted soft tissue repair.
Discussions
In our previous studies, small extracellular vesicles could be isolated from rat and porcine adipose tissue and these two types of sEVs showed the ability to promote soft tissue regeneration [13]. However, whether small extracellular vesicles could be isolated from human adipose tissue and whether it also showed effectiveness on soft tissue repair were unknown. In this study, we successfully isolated h-sEV-AT from human liposuction adipose tissue and confirmed that h-sEV-AT possessed the characterization of sEVs.
The migration and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells[18, 19] and endothelial cells[20, 21] were reported to play a crucial role in the regeneration progress. Therefore, we first cultured h-sEV-AT with ASCs and ECs. The results showed that these cells could successfully uptake h-sEV-AT within 6 h. Then, we evaluated the adipogenic differentiation of ASCs and the angiogenic differentiation of ECs induced by h-sEV-AT. The results indicated that h-sEV-AT showed the ability to induce the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells. This echoed the previous adipose tissue formation induced by rat and porcine adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles [13], further illustrating that different species-derived sEVs showed similar effects.
The ability of h-sEV-AT to promote adipose tissue regeneration and accelerate skin wound healing was further evaluated. We found that h-sEV-AT could significantly promote adipose tissue formation within 4 weeks. This provided us with a strategy to develop an ideal soft tissue replacement in a short period, which was well-vascularized. For skin wound healing, many types of small extracellular vesicles derived from human cells were used and showed effectiveness. For example, human ASC-derived exosomes were reported to promote skin wound healing [22]. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes also accelerated diabetic skin wound healing by increasing the expression of CD31 and Ki69 in the wound area [23]. Human amniotic fluid-derived stem cell-derived exosomes were reported to not only promote skin regeneration but also alleviate scar formation [24]. We noted that some studies pointed out that dermal adipose tissue showed an important function in skin development and repair [25, 26]. However, there was no study focused on the effect of human adipose tissue-derived sEVs on skin wound repair. In this study, by comparison of macro and microstructure, we found that h-sEV-AT could significantly accelerate skin wound healing and effectively induced re-epithelialization, blood vessel formation, and hair follicles regeneration.
The importance of understanding and modulating the inflammatory response was becoming increasingly appreciated for biomaterials in regenerative medicine [27]. Macrophages, a type of important immune cells with great plasticity, had received much attention [11]. Macrophages have been reported to switch phenotypes to modulate inflammation and promote tissue regeneration activities in response to environmental cues [11, 28]. The initial stage is marked by the presence of mostly pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages [29] but lasts for only a short time before giving way to the next phase, in which macrophages with an anti-inflammatory phenotype, like M2 macrophages, which could promote implants integration and tissue regeneration [17, 30–33].
A lot of studies have shown that sEVs possessed the anti-inflammation ability to polarize M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages which facilitated tissue regeneration [34–46]. However, the role of adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles in modulating macrophage phenotypes and whether it was associated with soft tissue repair was unclear. In this study, in vitro, we treated M1 macrophages with h-sEV-AT for 4 days. The results showed that h-sEV-AT could effectively promote the polarization of M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages. In vivo, we also found that the percentage of M2 macrophages was significantly increased by adding h-sEV-AT both in adipose tissue regeneration and skin wound healing.
Different from the sEVs derived from adipose stem cells (sEV-ASCs), there were many other cell types such as adipocytes, endothelial, immune cells, and fibroblasts which contributed to the secretion of sEV-AT. Although tissue-derived sEVs were more heterogeneous, they were closer to the microenvironment under physiological conditions and simpler to isolate than cell-derived sEVs. Besides, the immunoregulatory ability of sEV-AT to polarize macrophages might reflect the low immunogenicity of sEVs, which is beneficial in clinical transformation.
Despite these encouraging results, some limitations of mechanism and clinical transformation need to be further improved. For example, the use of a single component is more conducive to safety evaluation and dose standardization, and more conducive to clinical transformation, so which components of h-sEV-AT played a key role in the repair of soft tissue defects need to be further determined. In addition, M2 macrophages are known to be beneficial to tissue regeneration. However, studies in recent years have shown that the immune regulation mechanism is extremely complex, and all types of macrophages are indispensable in the process of tissue repair [47]. Therefore, it is necessary to further clarify the specific role of different immune cells in the process of tissue regeneration, which is also what clinical transformation of biological agents needs in-depth research.
Conclusions
In this study, we, for the first study, isolated h-sEV-AT from human liposuction adipose tissue and confirmed that it showed encouraging effectiveness in soft tissue repair. Besides, we also indicated that the ability of sEV-AT to induce soft tissue repair was supported by not only the differentiation of ASCs and ECs but also the polarization of macrophages. Considering the abundant sources, high yield, and guaranteed effectiveness, h-sEV-AT appeared to be a potential raw material for further application.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the members of the Tian Lab for the helpful discussions and assistance.
Abbreviations
- h-sEV-AT
Human adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles
- ASCs
Adipose-derived stromal/ stem cells
- ECs
Endothelial cells
- sEV-AT
Adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles
- sEVs
Adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles
- IL-6
Interleukin 6
- IL-1β
Interleukin 1 beta
- TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
- IL-4
Interleukin 4
- IL-13
Interleukin 13
- TGF-β1
Transforming growth factor-beta 1
- IL-10
Interleukin 10
- PPARγ2
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ2
- C/EBPα
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha
- FABP4
Fatty acid binding protein 4
- VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- FGF2
Fibroblast growth factor 2
Author contributions
JD, BW, and WT designed and discussed the experiment; JD performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the original draft; WT revised the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M722257) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20369). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was performed following the principles recommended by the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients agreed to offer their liposuction tissue and were informed of the procedures and purpose of the study. All experiments and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committees of West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University (Title of the approved project: Study on tissue repair promoted by liposuction adipose tissue-derived extracellular vesicles; Approval number: WCHSIRB-CT-2022-281; Date of approval: June 30, 2022). All animal experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Sichuan University. All animal experiments in our research followed the Animal Research: Reporting of in Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines. All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University (Title of the approved project: The effect of dose and species of adipose tissue-derived small extracellular vesicles on soft tissue repair; Approval number: WCHSIRB-D-2020-391; Date of approval: November 30, 2020).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no competing interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Jia Dong, Email: scu2013dongjia@sina.com.
Weidong Tian, Email: drtwd@sina.com.
References
- 1.Raposo G, Stahl P. Extracellular vesicles: a new communication paradigm? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(9):509–510. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0158-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flaherty S, Grijalva A, Xu X, Ables E, Nomani A, Ferrante A. A lipase-independent pathway of lipid release and immune modulation by adipocytes. Science (New York, NY) 2019;363(6430):989–993. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jeppesen D, Fenix A, Franklin J, Higginbotham J, Zhang Q, Zimmerman L, Liebler D, Ping J, Liu Q, Evans R, et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell. 2019;177(2):428–445.e418. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang X, Sun C, Wang L, Guo X. New insight into isolation, identification techniques and medical applications of exosomes. J Control Rel. 2019;308:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Théry C, Witwer K, Aikawa E, Alcaraz M, Anderson J, Andriantsitohaina R, Antoniou A, Arab T, Archer F, Atkin-Smith G, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ahn S, Park W, Kim Y, Sung D, Sung S, Ahn J, Chang Y. Vascular endothelial growth factor mediates the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles against neonatal hyperoxic lung injury. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(4):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0055-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang S, Chu W, Lai R, Lim S, Hui J, Toh W. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(12):2135–2140. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Qi X, Zhang J, Yuan H, Xu Z, Li Q, Niu X, Hu B, Wang Y, Li X. Exosomes secreted by human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells repair critical-sized bone defects through enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis in osteoporotic rats. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12(7):836–849. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.14809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grainger D. All charged up about implanted biomaterials. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(6):507–509. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Karin M, Clevers H. Reparative inflammation takes charge of tissue regeneration. Nature. 2016;529(7586):307–315. doi: 10.1038/nature17039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wynn T, Vannella K. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450–462. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mosser D, Edwards J. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):958–969. doi: 10.1038/nri2448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dong J, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Yu M, Tian W. Comparison of the therapeutic effect of allogeneic and xenogeneic small extracellular vesicles in soft tissue repair. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:6975–6991. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S269069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dai M, Yu M, Zhang Y, Tian W. Exosome-like vesicles derived from adipose tissue provide biochemical cues for adipose tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;23:1221–1230. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang Y, Yu M, Dai M, Chen C, Tang Q, Jing W, Wang H, Tian W. miR-450a-5p within rat adipose tissue exosome-like vesicles promotes adipogenic differentiation by targeting WISP2. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(6):1158–1168. doi: 10.1242/jcs.197764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.He C, Dai M, Zhou X, Long J, Tian W, Yu M. Comparison of two cell-free therapeutics derived from adipose tissue: small extracellular vesicles versus conditioned medium. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02757-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li H, Sun J, Li J, Yang H, Luo X, Chen J, Xie L, Huo F, Zhu T, Guo W, et al. Xenogeneic bio-root prompts the constructive process characterized by macrophage phenotype polarization in rodents and nonhuman primates. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(5):1601112. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brown C, McKee C, Bakshi S, Walker K, Hakman E, Halassy S, Svinarich D, Dodds R, Govind CK, Chaudhry GR. Mesenchymal stem cells: Cell therapy and regeneration potential. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13(9):1738–1755. doi: 10.1002/term.2914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fu X, Liu G, Halim A, Ju Y, Luo Q, Song AG. Mesenchymal stem cell migration and tissue repair. Cells. 2019;8(8):784. doi: 10.3390/cells8080784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ribatti D, Tamma R, Annese T. The role of vascular niche and endothelial cells in organogenesis and regeneration. Exp Cell Res. 2021;398(1):112398. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yuan P, Ma X. Endothelial cells facilitate cell-based cardiac repair: progress and challenge. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;9(5):415–423. doi: 10.2174/1574888X09666140710100143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang L, Hu L, Zhou X, Xiong Z, Zhang C, Shehada HMA, Hu B, Song J, Chen L. Exosomes secreted by human adipose mesenchymal stem cells promote scarless cutaneous repair by regulating extracellular matrix remodelling. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12919-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yang J, Chen Z, Pan D, Li H, Shen J. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes combined pluronic F127 hydrogel promote chronic diabetic wound healing and complete skin regeneration. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:5911–5926. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S249129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wgealla M, Liang H, Chen R, Xie Y, Li F, Qin M, Zhang X. Amniotic fluid derived stem cells promote skin regeneration and alleviate scar formation through exosomal miRNA-146a-5p via targeting CXCR4. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;52:5026–5036. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Merrick D, Seale P. Skinny fat cells stimulate wound healing. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(6):801–803. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Guerrero-Juarez C, Plikus M. Emerging nonmetabolic functions of skin fat. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(3):163–173. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Anderson J, Rodriguez A, Chang D. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86–100. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Witherel C, Abebayehu D, Barker T, Spiller K. Macrophage and fibroblast interactions in biomaterial-mediated fibrosis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(4):e1801451. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Daley J, Brancato S, Thomay A, Reichner J, Albina J. The phenotype of murine wound macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87(1):59–67. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0409236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sindrilaru A, Peters T, Wieschalka S, Baican C, Baican A, Peter H, Hainzl A, Schatz S, Qi Y, Schlecht A, et al. An unrestrained proinflammatory M1 macrophage population induced by iron impairs wound healing in humans and mice. J Clin Investig. 2011;121(3):985–997. doi: 10.1172/JCI44490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Spiller K, Nassiri S, Witherel C, Anfang R, Ng J, Nakazawa K, Yu T, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Sequential delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance vascularization of bone scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2015;37:194–207. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lan T, Chen J, Zhang J, Huo F, Han X, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Huang Y, Liao L, Xie L, et al. Xenoextracellular matrix-rosiglitazone complex-mediated immune evasion promotes xenogenic bioengineered root regeneration by altering M1/M2 macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2021;276:121066. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu W, Gao R, Yang C, Feng Z, Ou-Yang W, Pan X, Huang P, Zhang C, Kong D, Wang W. Staphylococcus aureusECM-mimetic immunomodulatory hydrogel for methicillin-resistant-infected chronic skin wound healing. Sci Adv. 2022;8(27):eabn7006. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li N, Gao Z, Zhao L, Du B, Ma B, Nian H, Wei R. viaMSC-derived small extracellular vesicles attenuate autoimmune dacryoadenitis by promoting M2 macrophage polarization and inducing Tregs miR-100-5p. Front Immunol. 2022;13:888949. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.888949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tang Y, Wu P, Li L, Xu W, Jiang J. Mesenchymal stem cells and their small extracellular vesicles as crucial immunological efficacy for hepatic diseases. Front Immunol. 2022;13:880523. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.880523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang S, Jiang H, Qian M, Ji G, Wei Y, He J, Tian H, Zhao Q. MSC-derived sEV-loaded hyaluronan hydrogel promotes scarless skin healing by immunomodulation in a large skin wound model. Biomed Mater (Bristol, England) 2022;17(3):034104. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ac68bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhao R, Wang L, Wang T, Xian P, Wang H, Long Q. Inhalation of MSC-EVs is a noninvasive strategy for ameliorating acute lung injury. J Control Rel. 2022;345:214–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu Y, Zhang Z, Wang B, Dong Y, Zhao C, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Liu X, Guo J, Chen Y, et al. Inflammation-stimulated MSC-derived small extracellular vesicle miR-27b-3p regulates macrophages by targeting CSF-1 to promote temporomandibular joint condylar regeneration. Small. 2022;18(16):e2107354. doi: 10.1002/smll.202107354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kwak G, Cheng J, Kim H, Song S, Lee S, Yang Y, Jeong J, Lee J, Messersmith P, Kim S. Sustained exosome-guided macrophage polarization using hydrolytically degradable peg hydrogels for cutaneous wound healing: identification of key proteins and MiRNAs, and sustained release formulation. Small. 2022;18(15):e2200060. doi: 10.1002/smll.202200060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang S, Chuah S, Lai R, Hui J, Lim S, Toh W. MSC exosomes mediate cartilage repair by enhancing proliferation, attenuating apoptosis and modulating immune reactivity. Biomaterials. 2018;156:16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Toh W, Zhang B, Lai R, Lim S. Immune regulatory targets of mesenchymal stromal cell exosomes/small extracellular vesicles in tissue regeneration. Cytotherapy. 2018;20(12):1419–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lo Sicco C, Reverberi D, Balbi C, Ulivi V, Principi E, Pascucci L, Becherini P, Bosco M, Varesio L, Franzin C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as mediators of anti-inflammatory effects: endorsement of macrophage polarization. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(3):1018–1028. doi: 10.1002/sctm.16-0363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Blázquez R, Sánchez-Margallo F, Álvarez V, Usón A, Marinaro F, Casado J. Fibrin glue mesh fixation combined with mesenchymal stem cells or exosomes modulates the inflammatory reaction in a murine model of incisional hernia. Acta Biomater. 2018;71:318–329. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Deng S, Zhou X, Ge Z, Song Y, Wang H, Liu X, Zhang D. Exosomes from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate cardiac damage after myocardial infarction by activating S1P/SK1/S1PR1 signaling and promoting macrophage M2 polarization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2019;114:105564. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.105564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lv K, Li Q, Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhong Z, Zhao J, Lin X, Wang J, Zhu K, Xiao C, et al. Incorporation of small extracellular vesicles in sodium alginate hydrogel as a novel therapeutic strategy for myocardial infarction. Theranostics. 2019;9(24):7403–7416. doi: 10.7150/thno.32637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhao H, Shang Q, Pan Z, Bai Y, Li Z, Zhang H, Zhang Q, Guo C, Zhang L, Wang Q. Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells attenuate adipose inflammation and obesity through polarizing M2 macrophages and beiging in white adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2018;67(2):235–247. doi: 10.2337/db17-0356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pajarinen J, Lin T, Gibon E, Kohno Y, Maruyama M, Nathan K, Lu L, Yao Z, Goodman SB. Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials. 2019;196:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.