Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Environ Health Rep. 2022 Oct 25;9(4):673–696. doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00382-4

Metals exposures and DNA methylation: Current evidence and future directions

Elana R Elkin 1,*, Cesar Higgins 2,*, Max T Aung 3, Kelly M Bakulski 2
PMCID: PMC10082670  NIHMSID: NIHMS1884184  PMID: 36282474

Abstract

Purpose of the review:

Exposure to essential and non-essential metals is widespread. Metals exposure is linked to epigenetic, particularly DNA methylation, differences. The strength of evidence with respect to the metal exposure type, timing, and level, as well as the DNA methylation association magnitude, and reproducibility are not clear. Focusing on the most recent three years, we reviewed the human epidemiologic evidence (n=26 studies) and the toxicologic animal model evidence (n=18 studies) for associations between metals exposure and DNA methylation.

Recent findings:

In humans, the greatest number of studies focused on lead exposure, followed by studies examining cadmium and arsenic. Approximately half of studies considered metals exposure during the in utero period and measured DNA methylation with the genome-wide Illumina arrays in newborn blood or placenta. Few studies performed formal replication testing or meta-analyses. Toxicology studies of metals and epigenetics had diversity in model systems (mice, rats, drosophila, tilapia, and zebrafish were represented), high heterogeneity of tissues used for DNA methylation measure (liver, testis, ovary, heart, blood, brain, muscle, lung, kidney, whole embryo), and a variety of technologies used for DNA methylation assessment (global, gene specific, genome-wide). The most common metals tested in toxicologic studies were lead and cadmium.

Summary:

Together, the recent studies reviewed provide the strongest evidence for DNA methylation signatures with prenatal metals exposures. There is also mounting epidemiologic evidence supporting lead, arsenic, and cadmium exposures with DNA methylation signatures in adults. The field of metals and DNA methylation is strengthened by the inclusion of both epidemiology and toxicology approaches, and further advancements can be made by coordinating efforts or integrating analyses across studies. Future advances in understanding the molecular basis of sequence specific epigenetic responses to metals exposures, methods for handling exposure mixtures in a genome-wide analytic framework, and pipelines to facilitate collaborative testing will continue to advance the field.

Keywords: Metals, epigenetics, DNA methylation, exposure, lead, cadmium

Introduction

Environmental exposures to metals are an enduring public health issue. Non-essential metals, such as lead and cadmium, are those with no normal physiologic function in the body. At increasing levels, they have deleterious effects on multiple health endpoints, including neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, and cardiometabolic disorders [1-3]. Non-essential metal exposures arise through multiple sources and pathways, including contamination of food and water systems from industrial processes, as well as exposure through ambient air and tobacco smoke [4]. Other trace metals, such as manganese and selenium, are distinguished by their essential nature for normal biological processes, including serving as co-factors for enzymatic function or as a component of amino acids (selenocysteine) [5,6]. Essential metals can exhibit non-linear dose-response curves with health endpoints, wherein toxicity is observed at both low and excess levels. Epidemiology studies can approximate human exposure to environmental trace metals through biomonitoring levels in human tissue (e.g. placenta, whole blood) and excretion samples (e.g. urine and fecal samples), but these studies are often observational and available tissues may be limited. Toxicology studies of trace metals are better able to assess causality and mechanisms of action, however their findings may not always be able to be extrapolated to humans. Selection of model systems and relevance of dose for human exposures are important toxicologic study design factors. Across both epidemiology and toxicology studies of metals, the exposure timing (e.g. adulthood, in utero), route (e.g. inhalation, ingestion, injection), duration (e.g. acute, chronic), and source, and dose may influence the impacts. Altogether, the integration of complementary evidence from both epidemiology and toxicology studies are critical for advancing human health risk assessments of metals exposures.

Metals exposure levels related to health can have epigenetic marks as a biomarker or mechanism of that action. Upon human exposure, trace metals can interact with enzymes and interfere with intracellular gradients of micronutrients and reactive oxygen species [7]. These interactions are detectable via shifts in molecular signals, including epigenetic modifications [8]. There are several types of epigenetic modifications, and although their mechanisms are unique, they have important implications for regulating gene expression. DNA methylation is one epigenetic mechanism that can directly influence the magnitude of gene expression. Levels of epigenetic factors and responses to metals exposure can be tissue specific. For example, whole blood and saliva are less invasive source tissues in epidemiology studies, and they may be a proxy or surrogate of changes in the epigenome at hypothesized target organs where toxicological effects are occurring [9]. Studies conducted in animal models are better equipped to directly determine epigenetic mechanisms in target tissues, such as the brain or heart. The timing of epigenetic measurements is also important. When measuring epigenetics as a potential consequence of environmental exposures, prospective study designs with exposure prior to DNA methylation measurement are necessary. Biologically there are major waves of epigenetic change throughout the life course, including the in utero or early life period for all tissues, or other time periods like puberty for specific tissues. Studies may monitor exposures during these windows of epigenetic susceptibility.

In this review article, we link together exciting recent research on metals and epigenetics. The field of metals and epigenetics has been active for at least two decades and previous review articles summarized early progress [10-13]. To bring the reader up to date, in this article, we focused on metals and epigenetics research published in the last three years. First, we cover the domain of human population-based epidemiology. Second, we review studies using model system-based toxicology. In both fields of research, we summarized their findings and evaluated the strength of the current evidence. Lastly, we reflect on the critical gaps and future directions of this field to make suggestions for strategies to make further advances.

Metals and epigenetics: Epidemiologic evidence

Many recent studies have associated metal exposures to changes in epigenetic endpoints. Through a PubMed search (Supplementary Methods) and subject matter expertise, we identified recent epidemiologic observational studies, published between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022. DNA methylation is the most common epigenetic endpoint used in epidemiologic studies that include epigenetic measurement. We included studies based on DNA methylation being the primary endpoint, metal exposure the primary exposure, and observational studies based on human subjects only (Supplemental Figure 1). These epidemiological studies vary in design, sample characteristics, and timing of exposure and DNA methylation collection. Our findings included 26 observational studies, including three prospective studies, three meta-analyses, nineteen cross-sectional studies, and one case-control study (Table 1). We organized the results by study design and when possible, by metal exposure (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Epidemiology-based studies of metals exposure and DNA methylation published between January 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022.

Citation Study design Study sample Metal Metal exposure
assessment (tissue,
timing)
Target tissue for
epigenetic analysis
Endpoint/method of epigenetic
measurement
Epigenetic findings Non-epigenetic findings
[72] Case-control Study sample (n=177), cases (n=59)
Shanxi (China)
Lead Umbilical cord tissue and blood samples of infants collected at delivery or time of termination Blood (umbilical cord) DNA methylation via Sequenom MassARRAY with bisulfite PCR Higher methylation of gene WNT3A was significantly higher in cases than in controls None
[73] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=46), cases (n=23)
(China)
Iron Oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) Sampling was performed before and during work at worksite. Blood (non-pregnant adults) DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation bisulfite conversion and pyrosequencing Higher median DNA hydroxymethylation levels in cases than in controls. No change in 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, and glutathione levels (markers for oxidative stress)
[24] Cross-sectional Exposed areas of high lead levels (n=102)
Exposed to areas of low lead levels (n=38)
Kabwe (Zambia)
Lead Blood levels. Analysis upon collection. Blood (non-pregnant adults) DNA methylation via methylation specific PCR High methylation levels of the ALAD gene in high lead exposed children in comparison to those in low exposed areas. None
[22] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=738) (531 for methylation)
(Taiwan)
Lead and Cadmium Urine samples, collected between 2006 & 2008 Blood (non-pregnant adults) Global DNA methylation levels (5-methyl-2*-deoxycytidine) were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography. The concentration was expressed as 5mdC/dG (a global marker of DNA methylation) Lead and cadmium had a direct and indirect effect, through 5mdC/dG, on atherosclerotic risk Cadmium exposure associated with elevated carotid intima-media thickness (proxy for atherosclerosis)
[17] Meta-analysis Sample size made up of two independent mother infant cohorts. New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study (n=306) and the Rhode Island Child Health Study (n=141)
(United States)
Copper For both cohorts, placental copper concentrations were measured at delivery. Placenta DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray The study identified 9 copper associated differentially methylated regions and 15 suggestive CpG sites. The DMR interfere with the expression of the gene ZNF197 which is commonly associated with birthweight None
[31] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=114)
(United States)
Multiple metals: Non-essential trace metals (cadmium, lead, mercury) and essential trace metals (manganese and selenium). Blood samples collected at two study visits during the pregnancy period Blood (pregnant adult) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray
Array average DNA methylation levels were compared for each metal
Average DNA methylation levels were higher for cadmium and manganese. After multiple comparison adjustment lead was associated with 11 individual CpG sites None
[18] Meta-analysis Two sites: Chile and Bangladesh
Chile
Study sample (n=40) from blood tissue & (n=39) from buccal sample
Exposed (n=20) from blood sample & exposed (n=19) from buccal sample
Bangladesh
Study Sample (n=48). Exposed to high arsenic levels (n=23).
In an additional sample of (n=32) male adults, (n=11) were exposed to high arsenic concentration levels
Arsenic Chile
Arsenic exposure assessed based on history of exposure to high arsenic areas in Region II
Bangladesh
Arsenic exposure assessed from baseline measurement of water sources
Chile
Blood (peripheral blood mononuclear cells, or PBMC)
Buccal Cells
Bangladesh
Blood (peripheral blood mononuclear cells, or PBMC)
Chile
DNA methylation measures were performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and buccal cells using the Illumina Infinium EPIC BeadArray
Bangladesh
DNA methylation measurement was performed using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray or EPIC BeadArray
Meta-analysis results of PBMC EWAS and buccal cells (Chile study only) identified three differentially methylated positions (DMPs). Regional analysis of the PBMC (include both countries) meta-analysis identified 11 differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Pathway analysis revealed representations of genes with differential methylation of fatty acid metabolism and lysosome. None
[16] Prospective Study sample
Cord blood sample (n=361)
Mid-Childhood (n=333)
(United States)
Multiple metals (aluminum, arsenic, barium, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, cesium, copper, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, tin, and mercury) Blood sample collected at recruitment during first trimester of pregnancy. Placenta
Blood (child)
DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium Human Methylation 450K BeadArray The study identified two CpG sites at which cord blood DNA methylation levels were associated with specific metals. Lead was associated with DNA methylation of the CASP8 gene. Manganese was associated with DNA methylation of the A2BP1 gene. These associations persisted through mid-childhood none
[19] Meta-analysis Study Sample
Cord blood sample (n=1462)
Childhood sample at age 7–8 years. (n=794)
Countries (Spain, Korea, United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Norway, Greece)
Mercury Depending on country cohort concentrations were measured in maternal blood, hair, or cord blood Blood (umbilical)
Blood (child)
DNA methylation measures derived from cord blood at delivery and child blood using the Illumina Infinium Human Methylation 450K BeadArray, except the Korean cohort that used the EPIC BeadArray Meta-analysis revealed total mercury concentrations associated with higher DNA methylation of two CPG sites annotated to MED31 in both cord and childhood blood. None
[15] Prospective Study sample. Cord blood sample (n=364)
(Korea)
Lead Maternal blood samples collected during early pregnancy (12-20 gestational weeks) and late pregnancy (28-42 gestational weeks) Blood (umbilical cord) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray Results demonstrated sex-specific differences in DNA methylation patterns. Among males 11 sites were associated with maternal blood lead levels during early pregnancy. None of the differentially methylated positions were present in the analysis for females None
[14] Prospective Study sample. Cord blood sample (n=89).
(Mexico)
Lead Blood lead levels were measured in each trimester. To obtain a cumulative indicator of lead levels, bone lead was measured in maternal left patella and left mid tibia one-month post-partum. Blood (umbilical cord) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray Trimester specific differentially methylated sites were identified. During first trimester, 3 CpG sites were significantly associated with blood lead levels, 1 CpG site with third trimester, and 2 sites with tibia bone lead levels. None
[23] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=96)
(United States)
Lead Blood spot samples from neonatal archives. Blood (neonate blood spots via heel stick) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray Without cell type adjustment lead levels were associated with 30 CpG sites that showed decreasing methylation and 3 CpG sites that showed increasing methylation. After cell-type proportion adjustment, CpG sites were not associated with lead None
[21] Cross-sectional Sample size (n=420 mother-child dyads)
Mexico City (Mexico)
Lead Maternal blood was collected during 2nd and 3rd trimester visits, as well as, umbilical cord. Additionally, bone lead measures were collected one-month post-partum from tibia and patella Blood (umbilical cord) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray The study found 47 significant CpG sites; among those the site cg25953130 has been associated with birthweight in two previous cohorts. no association between prenatal lead exposure and cord blood DNA methylation None
[30] Cross-sectional (but not specified) Study Sample (n=204). Exposed (101)
(China)
Multiple metals (Lead, cadmium, manganese, and chromium) Umbilical cord blood samples Blood (umbilical cord) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray The study identified 125 CpG sites differential methylated, 46 of which were hypermethylated and 79 were hypomethylated in the e-waste exposed group None
[28] Cross-sectional (within a prospective cohort) Study sample (n=2,325)
(United States)
Arsenic Urine samples collected at baseline (1989-1991) Blood (DNA extracted from white blood cells) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadArray This study identified 20 locus specific methylated positions associated with urine arsenic levels after multiple comparison adjustment. Additionally, a differentially methylated region in chromosome 11 was identified. Gene ontology analysis revealed pathways associated with transport of cysteine. The study also identified an association between urine arsenic levels and white blood cell proportions. In particular, a positive relationship between arsenic and NK cells.
[29] Cross-sectional Two study populations
Aragon Workers Health Study (AWHS) (n=30)
(Spain)
Folic Acid and Creatinine Trial (FACT) (n = 31)
(Bangladesh)
Arsenic Spain (AWHS)
Urine and blood samples were collected to measure inorganic and organic arsenic concentrations during 2011-2014
Bangladesh (FACT)
Urine and blood samples were collected to measure urinary arsenic metabolites and total blood arsenic concentrations (2009-2011)
Spain (AWHS)
Blood (whole blood)
Bangladesh (FACT)
Blood (peripheral blood mononuclear cells)
Spain (AWHS)
Measured DNA methylation (5mC) and hydroxymethylation (5-hmC) using the Cambridge Epigenetix kit TrueMethyl Array
Bangladesh (FACT)
Measured DNA methylation (5mC) and hydroxymethylation (5-hmC) using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadArray
In the AWHS study, 3 differentially methylated positions were associated with urine arsenic concentrations, these positions were annotated to the gene CLEC12A. In the FACT study, one differentially hydroxymethylated position was associated to blood arsenic concentrations and annotated to the gene NPLOC4. None
[26] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=2,325)
(United States)
Cadmium Urine samples collected at baseline (1989-1991) Blood (DNA extracted from white blood cells) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadArray The study found 6 differentially methylated positions associated with urine cadmium levels, these positions were annotated to genes PRSS23, 2q37.1, AHRR, F2RL3, and RARA. Enrichment analysis revealed pathways related to cancer, cardiovascular disease, and inflammation None
[27] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=185)
Exposed/Cases (n=92)
Unexposed/Controls (n=93)
(China)
Chromium Blood and urine samples for analysis of chromium concentrations Whole blood DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadArray This epigenome wide association study found a total of eight CpG sites associated with chromium levels. Enrichment analysis identified pathways related to single-organism process, cellular process, and response to stimulus. None
[25] Cross-sectional study Study sample (n=8)
(China)
Lead Blood lead concentration levels Whole blood DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadArray.
Validation was performed through pyrosequencing
The study found 356 differentially methylated sites associated with blood lead levels, gene ontology revealed that 180 of these sites were mapped to differentially methylated genes, enrichment was seen in gene ontology adherents junction, cell adhesion, and nervous system development None
[74] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=168)
Exposed (n=112)
Unexposed/Controls (n=56)
(China)
Chromium Blood and urine sample for analysis of chromium concentrations Peripheral blood Global DNA methylation was measured with the MethylFlash Methylated DNA ELISA assay Global DNA methylation analysis found statistically significant lower median global DNA methylation levels in exposed individuals to chromium (1.27%) in comparison to global DNA methylation levels in unexposed individuals (1.73%) (p<0.001). None
[75] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=151)
Exposed/E-waste workers (n=100)
Unexposed/Controls (n=51)
(Ghana)
Lead and Cadmium Blood and urine samples for analysis of lead and cadmium concentrations Whole blood samples Alterations in long interspersed nucleotide elements (LINE1) were used as a proxy for global DNA methylation. Additionally, CpG-specific methylation analysis was performed using PyroMark pyrosequencing. In multiple metal analysis, blood lead levels were associated with lower global DNA methylations (LINE1) in the e-waste exposed group after adjustment for age, behavioral risk factors, and biomass fuel use for cooking None
[76] Cross-sectional Study sample with metal and DNA methylation analysis (n=90)
(Peru)
Lead Whole blood lead levels Venous blood samples DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadArray The study found four differentially methylated positions and 45 differentially methylated regions associated with whole blood lead levels after multiple comparison adjustment. Enrichment analysis revealed differentially methylated regions mapped to genes involved in metal ion biding, neurodegeneration, neurogenesis, and neurological system process. None
[77] Cross-sectional Study sample with metal and DNA methylation analysis (n=100)
(Korea)
Cadmium Blood samples were used to measure cadmium concentrations Buffy coat sample DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450k BeadArray The study found 307 differentially methylated sites associated with blood cadmium concentration. Gene ontology analysis identified pathways related to transcription regulation and signal transduction None
[78] Cross-sectional (within a cohort) Study sample (n=67)
(Japan)
Mercury Umbilical cord blood (at childbirth) Umbilical cord tissue (at childbirth) DNA methylation via Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadArray The study found a differentially methylated position associated with mercury blood concentrations after multivariable adjustment. This CpG site was mapped to HDHD1, a gene that may be involved in RNA processing and turnover. None
[79] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=91)
(China)
Arsenic, Nickel, Silver, Lanthanum, Cerium Venous blood sample Venous blood sample Global DNA methylation levels (5-mc) were measured using MethylFlash and Imprint In this study, blood cerium levels were associated with lower global DNA methylation blood levels among former e-waste dismantling workers None
[80] Cross-sectional Study sample (n=181)
(Mexico)
Toxic Metals
Arsenic, Manganese, Mercury, Molybdenum, Lead,
Essential Trace Metals
Copper, Selenium, Zinc
Maternal urine samples were obtained for analysis of metals at time of delivery Umbilical cord blood (at time of delivery) Alterations in long interspersed nucleotide elements (LINE1) was used as a marker of global DNA methylation. Gene-specific methylation of OGG1 (4 CpG sites) and PARP1 (12 CpG sites) analysis was performed using PyroMark pyrosequencing. Maternal urine levels of molybdenum and manganese were associated with lower global DNA methylation levels in cord blood. Zinc, an essential trace metal, was associated with higher global DNA methylation in cord blood. None

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Summary of epidemiology-based metals exposure and DNA methylation studies published between January 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022.

DNA methylation is sequence specific and microarrays or sequencing technologies allow for measurement of DNA methylation at candidate locations or genome-wide to test for differentially methylated positions or regions. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) are performed as a discovery analysis when all positions or regions are tested for differences. These methods often rely on bisulfite treatment of the DNA, which converts an un-modified cytosine to uracil and maintains modified cytosines in the sequence.

Prospective studies

Prospective studies are a strong epidemiologic study design as the exposures are measured prior to DNA methylation measures, limiting the potential for reverse causation. We identified three prospective studies testing prenatal maternal lead concentration levels and cord blood DNA methylation at birth. Although there were substantial differences in sample size, these studies were characterized by having repeated measures of lead concentrations during critical gestational periods with the purpose of unveiling 1) trimester-specific effects of maternal lead exposure on the offspring DNA methylation levels, and 2) sex-specific DNA methylation patterns in response to lead exposure. Specifically, in a cohort of Mexican mother-child pairs, first trimester blood lead concentrations were associated with DNA methylation levels at three sites, annotated to the genes RAB5A, EXT1, and a non-genic region, and sites were enriched for pathways related to neurodevelopment [14]. No associations were observed between second trimester maternal blood lead levels and DNA methylation, but third trimester blood lead concentrations were associated with one site in a non-genic region [14]. Additionally, in a study of mother-child pairs in Korea, the maternal blood lead levels measured during pregnancy weeks 12-20 were tested with infant sex-specific cord blood DNA methylation was tested [15]. Among males, 11 sites were differentially methylated by lead levels, and sites were enriched for endothelial cell development via CDH5 and axonogenesis via PLXNA4 [15]. Among females, no differentially methylated sites were observed [15]. Finally, a multi-metal epigenome-wide association study in the United States explored the relationship between prenatal exposure to essential and non-essential trace metals during first trimester of pregnancy and DNA methylation at two time points, in cord blood at birth and in whole blood at mid childhood [16]. Manganese concentrations were associated with higher DNA methylation at one site, mapping to the gene A2BP1, while lead exposure was associated with to lower DNA methylation of a site, mapping to the gene CASP8. In females, manganese exposure was associated with nine differentially methylated sites, seven of which persisted to mid-childhood [16]. Among males, manganese exposure was associated with higher DNA methylation of one site linked to the gene A2BP1, which persisted to mid-childhood [16]. Jointly, the results from these studies suggest that metal exposures during critical gestational periods, in particular during the first trimester of pregnancy, are associated with sex-dependent differences in DNA methylation in the offspring, which may persist until mid-childhood.

Meta-analyses

Discovery analyses through EWAS are often challenged by a greater number of DNA methylation positions being tested than number of participants in the study. Testing for replication or meta-analyses across samples can help reduce false positive associations. It has traditionally been difficult to perform meta-analyses of metal exposure epigenetic signatures due to heterogeneity in relevant design characteristics such as sample size, demographic composition (sex and genetic ancestry), timing of metal exposure (prenatal vs adulthood), and epigenetic tissues measured (cord blood, buccal cells, and blood). Three recent meta-analyses used standardized protocols to harmonize exposure assessment and DNA methylation datasets with the aim of identifying epigenetic signatures of copper [17], arsenic [18] and mercury exposure [19], across different populations.

The first meta-analysis combined data from two mother-infant pair cohorts, the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study and the Rhode Island Child Health Study, to explore the relationship between placental copper concentrations and genome-wide DNA methylation in placental tissue [17]. These cohorts had similar collection of demographic and anthropometric measures from mother-infant pairs, assessment of metal concentrations, measurement of DNA methylation, and data analysis procedures. Through meta-analysis, placental copper concentrations were associated with DNA methylation at 15 sites and a region in the promoter of the gene GSTP1 [17]. Sensitivity analyses indicated these results were robust to differences in the racial/ethnic composition of the two cohorts [17]. With common investigators involved in the design of these two cohorts, harmonization of exposure assessment and DNA methylation measurement was facilitated.

In the meta-analysis of prenatal mercury exposure and DNA methylation, seven existing cohorts participated [19], and this collaboration was facilitated through the Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics consortium [20]. Total mercury cord blood concentration was selected as the primary exposure variable. For cohorts with mercury assessment in different tissues (one in maternal hair and five in maternal whole blood), exposure levels were transformed to cord blood levels. The timing of DNA methylation measures varied across cohorts. Five cohorts measured cord blood DNA methylation at birth, four cohorts measured child blood DNA methylation at ages 7-8, and two cohorts had DNA methylation measures for both time points [19]. By leveraging the increased power across cohorts, the meta-analysis identified mercury exposure was associated with higher DNA methylation levels at two sites mapped to the MED31 gene in both cord and childhood blood. These findings suggest prenatal exposure to mercury is associated with DNA methylation differences at birth that are sustained through childhood.

Third, the meta-analysis of arsenic and DNA methylation aimed at identifying arsenic related signatures of DNA methylation across two different studies (in Chile and Bangladesh) through standardized data pipelines, study design procedures, and common applications of statistical methods [18]. The two study samples had differences in exposure assessment and selected tissues for DNA methylation analysis. The Chilean study assessed exposure based on recruitment from historical high or low arsenic exposure areas. The Bangladesh study measured baseline arsenic levels in water samples during recruitment [18]. The Chilean sample used peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and buccal cells for DNA methylation measurement, while the Bangladesh study used blood samples only [18]. Results were meta-analyzed using a combination of all PBMC samples from Chile and Bangladesh; and all PBMC samples (Chile and Bangladesh) plus buccal cells (Chile only). The meta-analysis from all PBMC samples revealed 11 differentially methylated regions, the meta-analysis from PBMC plus buccal cells identified 16 differentially methylated regions, and eight of the differentially methylated regions overlapped [18]. Arsenic-associated sites were enriched for pathways related to fatty acid elongation, fatty acid metabolism, and lysosome activity [18]. In general, these copper, mercury, and arsenic meta-analyses leverage large sample sizes to achieve statistical power to detect common epigenetic signatures from unique metal exposures across widely diverse populations. Standardized data procedures facilitated DNA methylation analysis from different tissues and time points to identify persistent epigenetic differences across the lifespan.

Cross-sectional studies

Cross-sectional studies are a highly feasible epidemiologic study design because they only require one participant visit, though we should be cautious when interpreting findings. Across 19 cross-sectional studies identified, lead exposure was the most researched metal [21-24]. These studies varied in sample size, geographical region, and target tissue. In general, lead blood levels were associated with gene specific DNA methylation patterns, higher average levels of DNA methylation, or differentially methylated sites. In Zambia, blood lead levels were correlated with differential patterns of DNA methylation of the ALAD and the p16 tumor suppressor gene promoter regions [24]. At least 84.3% of children with high lead exposure levels exhibited altered ALAD gen DNA methylation, in comparison to only 42.1% of children with low lead exposure levels [24]. In a study involving neonates from the United States, lead exposure was associated with lower cord blood DNA methylation at 30 sites and higher methylation at three sites [23]. These associations were attenuated after adjusting for blood cell type proportions, which is an important factor in DNA methylation profiles. A small study of occupational lead exposure in China analyzed DNA methylation associations with high blood lead levels (>300μg/L) versus low (<100μg/L), and lead concentrations were associated with 356 differentially methylated sites enriched for pathways associated with nervous system development [25]. Lastly, in Mexico, an epigenome-wide association study of prenatal lead exposure and cord blood DNA methylation found 47 differently methylated sites, 20 of which were previously identified to be associated with low birth weight [21]. These findings may suggest differences in DNA methylation may be a mechanism by which lead exposure contributes to low birth weight [21]. Altogether, these studies provide evidence of the variable effects of lead exposure on DNA methylation at early life stages and during adulthood, though a formal meta-analysis across studies has not yet been performed and is warranted.

After lead, the next most abundant metals examined in human cross-sectional studies are cadmium, arsenic, and chromium. Among 13 American Indian tribes, cadmium exposure in adults was associated with six DNA methylation sites, and sites were enriched for cancer pathways, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and inflammation [26]. A cross-sectional analysis of electroplating workers in China found chromium exposure was associated with eight DNA methylation sites, these results were confirmed in vitro; and were associated with expression of SEMA4B, a gene involved in chromium-related carcinogenesis [27]. Chronic arsenic exposure has previously been associated with epigenetic dysregulation and carcinogenesis. A large United States cross-sectional study observed arsenic exposure was associated with 20 differentially methylated sites and one differentially methylated region, which were consistent across sex groups and replicated findings from independent studies [28]. The most significant differentially methylated site mapped to the SLC7A11 gene, involved in transport of cysteine, an established mechanism related to arsenic [28]. In a cross-sectional study in Spain and Bangladesh, urinary arsenic levels were associated with six common differentially methylated sites and seven differentially hydroxymethylated sites, enriched for cardiometabolic disease, inflammation, and cancer [29]. Across these metals, there may be sufficient individual studies for a formal meta-analysis to examine consistency across populations.

Environmental exposure to metals occurs in mixtures, and a diverse set of cross-sectional studies have analyzed the associations between multiple metal exposures and DNA methylation. For example, among Chinese mothers exposed to e-waste recycling areas during pregnancy, concentrations of lead, cadmium, manganese, and chromium were tested for association with DNA methylation in their newborns’ cord blood [30]. Multiple metal exposures were associated with 125 differentially methylated sites, including 79 with higher DNA methylation and 46 with lower DNA methylation [30]. In Taiwan, a log unit increase in lead concentration was associated 0.315% higher global DNA methylation (p < 0.001), and a log unit increase in cadmium concentration was associated with 0.263% higher global DNA methylation (p < 0.001) [22]. One study evaluated the relationship between maternal concentrations of three non-essential metals (lead, cadmium, and mercury) and two essential trace metals (manganese and selenium), and whole blood DNA methylation levels during pregnancy [31]. Cadmium and manganese exposure were associated with higher global DNA methylation [31]. Lead was associated with 11 differentially methylated sites (false discovery rate <0.1), enriched for neurology-related gene ontologies [31], similar to previous observations [14]. These studies demonstrate that differences in DNA methylation may be observed at different life periods with concomitant exposure to multiple metals.

Case-control studies

Case-control studies can be leveraged for environmental epigenetic epidemiology to provide insights for populations with existing conditions. A matched case-control study conducted mediation analysis to explore the indirect effect of DNA methylation at the WNT3A gene on the relationship between prenatal lead exposure and non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate (NSCL/P). In utero lead concentrations were associated (p < 0.05) with 0.52% higher DNA methylation at the WNT3A gene. They also observed that 9.2% of the lead exposure association with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate may be attributable to the mediating effect of WNT3A DNA methylation. Additional studies indirectly point to the role of metals in DNA methylation. For example, a matched case-control study explored the joint association between blood aluminum levels and DNA methylation of the beta-2 adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) gene in asthmatic children (n=70) compared to those without asthma (n=70) [32]. High aluminum levels were associated with asthma (OR = 11.6, 95%CI: 2.1, 63.4), but high ADRB2 DNA methylation was not associated with asthma (OR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.2, 3.1), suggesting uncontrolled asthma may be affected by elevated blood aluminum concentrations rather than ADRB2 DNA methylation [32]. However, the study did not explore the relationship between aluminum concentrations and ADRB2 DNA methylation levels directly. In studies such as this, it will be possible to directly test for relationships between exposure and DNA methylation in the future.

Together, the recent epidemiology studies reviewed provide the strongest evidence for DNA methylation signatures with prenatal exposures to lead, mercury, arsenic, copper, and cadmium. Epidemiology studies of metals and DNA methylation are strengthened by prospective study designs and collaborative meta-analysis or replication testing. Common limitations of these studies include using surrogate tissues for both exposure and DNA methylation assessment, instead of the target tissues. DNA methylation measures area often collected at delivery, though critical periods in development may occur earlier. Complementary toxicology studies are able to overcome many of these challenges and provide controlled exposure doses and epigenetic measures in target tissues.

Metals and epigenetics: Toxicologic evidence

Overview of metal exposure toxicology studies with epigenetic endpoints

Metal exposure toxicology studies with epigenetic endpoints seek to investigate biological mechanisms of exposure toxicity and the role of changes in the epigenome. We searched for metal exposure toxicology studies with epigenetic endpoints published as current research between January 1, 2019 and March 21, 2022 (Supplementary Methods). We included studies based on epigenetic factors being the primary endpoint, metal exposure the primary exposure/treatment, and studies in animal models only (Supplemental Figure 2). A total of 18 studies were identified (Table 2).

Table 2.

Toxicology-based studies of metals exposure and DNA methylation published between January 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022.

Citation Species/Strain Condition Tissue Type Number of
Animals/sex
Metal/Dose/Exposure
Method/ Duration
Endpoint/Method of Measurement Epigenetic findings Non-epigenetic findings
[44] zebrafish embryo embryo 30 embryos set in 3 parallels 0 ,0.0089, 0.089, and 0.89 μM cadmium in fresh water for 24 h Global DNA methylation via MethylFlash Methylated DNA Quantification Kit (colorimetric) Global DNA methylation analysis: ↓ DNA methylation in highest dose that returned to normal with time; DMNTs gene expression: 0.089 μM Cd exposure group ↑ DNMT1 and 3 upregulated, 0.89 μM Cd exposure group ↓ DNMT3 None
[41] mice (C57BL/6J) pregnant females neuronal cortex cells isolated from brain of adult male offspring (F1) 3 males per 3 treatment groups 2.1 ppm (low), or 32 ppm (high) lead in drinking water and lactation for 2 weeks prior to mating and 3 weeks after birth (through weaning) DNA methylation of gene promoters via NimbleGen Mouse 3x720K CpG Island Promoter Array (Roche) DNA methylation analysis of promoters: Small level of ↓ DNA methylation in cortical neurons. None
[81] drosophila melanogaster adult female whole muscle tissue 50 samples 52 mg/L cadmium in air for 10 days Genome-wide DNA methylation via Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing (WGBS) Genome-wide DNA methylation: More genes ↓ DNA methylation in promoter region (39), than ↑ DNA methylation (24), Mekk1 , Slbp, baz, Cdc42, AGO3 ↓ methylation genes showed ↑ gene expression; Pathway analysis: ↓ DNA methylation in genes associated with development, reproduction, cellular defense and repair, antioxidant stress, and apoptosis. None
[42] rat (Sprague-Dawley) pregnant females hippocampus (brain) of offspring (F1) 9 control female; 9 treated females (3 pups per group for DNA methylation analysis) 1 g/L lead in drinking water and lactation for length of pregnancy until after offspring weaned (42 days) DNA methylation of gene promoters via NimbleGen’s rat DNA methylation 385K Promoter Plus CpG Island Array (Roche) DNA methylation analysis of promoters: ↑ DNA methylation of high CpG-containing promoters, intermediate CpG-containing promoters and low CpG-containing promoters in hippocampus. Learning and memory abilities of offspring significantly lower.
[40] Nile tilapia fish juvenile fish liver 100 fish per group (3 replicates) 10 and 50 μg/L cadmium in fresh water for 45 and 90 days Global DNA methylation via MethylFlash Methylated DNA Quantification Kit (colorimetric) and DNA methylation of imprinted genes GH and IFG-1 via bisulfite conversion/pyrosequencing Global DNA methylation analysis: Increase ↓ DNA methylation with increasing Cd concentration and exposure time; GH and IFG-1: ↑ methylation across dose and exposure time; DMNTs gene expression: ↓ DNMT3a and DNMT3b, otherwise, no significant t change; TETs gene expression: ↑ TET1 and TET2, otherwise, no significant change. Decreased body mass and body length. Elevated ROS and reduction of antioxidant activities.
[82] rat (Sprague-Dawley) pregnant females sperm in F0, F1, F2 generation of adult males 20 rats per treatment group 1 mg/rat/day uranium in drinking water and lactation for 9 months prior to pregnancy Global DNA methylation (ELISA) via 5-mC DNA ELISA Kit (Zymo) Global DNA methylation analysis: No change in F0 and F1 sperm, significant ↓ DNA methylation in F2 sperm; DMNTs gene expression: F0 ↓ DMNT3L, otherwise, no significant change; TETs gene expression: F2 ↓ TET2 and TET3, otherwise, no significant change. Higher number of abnormal sperm in F1 generation than F0 and F2 generations; Reduced pregnancy rate in F1 generation.
[83] mice (NIH/OlaHsd) 5 week and 10 week male mice lung 6 male mice per treatment group 20 mg/kg titanium dioxide in intranasal instillation for distal pulmonary delivery for 30 days Global DNA methylation via MethylFlashMethylated DNA Quantification Kit (colorimetric), hyroxymethylation via MethylFlash Hydroxymethylated DNA Quantification Kit (colorimetric) and genes specific DNA methylation via bisulfite conversion/pyrosequencing Global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation analysis: ↓ DNA methylation and ↓ hyroxymethylation global methylation only in young group; DMNTs gene expression: ↑ DMNT1 and DMNT3B, TETs gene expression: ↑ TET1 and TET3, otherwise, no significant change The altered methylation in promoter of TNF-α and Thy-1 were found to play a role in the inflammatory response and fibration. RNA-sequencing showed that in pathways in cancer expression of 197 genes was up-regulated in the young mice more that in the adult mice. Pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis were more severe in young mice.
[84] mice ( C57BL/6J) pregnant females Brain in neonate offpring 6-7 offspring per treatment group separated by sex 0.25 μg/μL 1 μg/μL or 4 μg/μL titanium dioxide suspension intratracheally via MicroSprayer on GD 10.5 Genome-wide DNA methylation via Mouse CpG Island 2 × 105 K
Microarray
DNA methylation analysis of promoters: More Decreased DNA methylation, than increased methylation in both male and female mice; Correlation to RNA-seq data: 88 and 89 genes upregulated accompanied by demethylation of CpG
Islands, while 13 and 33 genes were downregulated accompanied by methylation of CpG islands in male and female offspring mice.
None
[85] rat (Wistar) adult male testis, liver and kidney 10 male rat each exposure group (total 30 rats) 75 mg/kg lead + 0.4 cadmium mg/kg, or 3750 mg/kg lead+ 6 mg/kg cadmium in soil at bottom of cage (Inhalation) for 1 year Global DNA methylation via Luminometric Methylation Assay (LUMA) Global DNA methylation analysis: ↓ DNA methylation in testes of high-dose group; DMNTs gene expression: ↓ DNMT3A and DMNT3B in high-dose group testes, otherwise, no significant change. After 1 year of exposure, the metal levels, Pb isotopic values, and molecular indicators were measured. Rats in the high-group showed significantly greater concentrations of Pb and Cd in tissues. Higher accumulation factors (tissue/soil) of Cd than Pb were observed in the liver, kidney, brain, and lung, while the factor of Pb was higher in the tibia.
[47] rat (Long-Evans) pregnant females ovaries and testes in F0-F3 6 male control; 6 male treated; 6 female control; 6 treated female 1 ppm arsenic in drinking water Global DNA methylation via MethylFlash Methylated DNA Quantification Kit (colorimetric) Global DNA methylation analysis: F0 testis ↓ DNA methylation, F2 and F3 testis ↑ DNA methylation, F3 ovaries ↑ DNA methylation. Sperm concentration, motility, vitality and morphology were decreased in all generations except F2.
[39] rat (Sprague-Dawley) adult rats liver 6-8 male rat per treatment group; 43 rats total; 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg/day cadmium via gavage (0, 5, and 40 mg/kg for methylation analysis) for 6 days a week for 12 weeks Genome-wide DNA methylation via Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing (WGBS) Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis: 40 mg/kg high-dose group ↓ DNA methylation in gene promoter regions, more DMRs and more concentrated in promoter regions compared to low-dose group, F2rl3 gene had 20% ↓ methylation; Pathway analysis: Cell transport and cell transformation pathways enrich in high dose group but not low-dose. No change to growth rate. Liver enzyme ALT and AST elevated in the two highest dose groups. Histopathological evidence of damage to liver cells.
[86] mice (C57BL/6J) adult male Spermatozoa 30 males 0.9 ppm cadmium in drinking water for 9 weeks Global DNA methylation via 5-mC DNA ELISA Kit (Zymo) and base-pair DNA methylation via Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (EERBS) for base-pair resolution Global DNA methylation analysis ↓ DNA methylation, but not significant; Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis: Differential methylation in 1788 CpGs, of which 58.78% (1051) ↑ DNA methylation and 41.22% (737) ↓ DNA methylation; Pathway analysis: DMRs in promoter regions of genes involved in spermatogenesis on chromosome 6. No effects on body weight, fat accumulation, or structure of mice testes.
[37] mice (C57BL/6J) pregnant females blood and liver in adult offspring (5 months) 6 males and 6 females 32 ppm lead in drinking water and lactation for 2 weeks prior to mating and 3 weeks after birth (through weaning) Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (EERBS) Genome-wide DNA methylation: Hundreds tissue-specific and sex-specific DMRs, hundreds differentially methylated sites directly overlapped between blood and liver; small subset of DMC-associated genes with significant overlap between tissues in both males and females, including obesity and metabolic syndrome genes Prdm16 and Fto. ↑ DNA methylation at the Gnas locus in both males and females was accompanied by reduced Gnas transcript expression. DNA methylation of imprinted genes: Bargain, Peg12, Rasgrf1, Snrpn differentially methylated across male liver and blood, none across female liver and blood, Commd1, Gnas, Nespas, Pde10a, and Pde4d differentially methylated across male and female liver; Pathway analysis: Enrichment for pathways involved in neurological development and function in male and female liver.  None
[87] mice (C57BL/6J) pregnant females cardiac in adult offspring 6 males and 6 females 32 ppm lead in drinking water and lactation for 2 weeks prior to mating and 3 weeks after birth (through weaning) Genome-wide DNA methylation via Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (EERBS) Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis: In males and females, differentially methylated cytosines (DMC) and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were more often ↑ DNA methylated than ↓DNA methylation, 100 genes in mapped to DMCs and 8 genes mapped to DMRs in common between males and females DMRs that overlapped directly between males and females; Pathway analysis: In males, methylation changes affect genes implicated in the regulation of the Notch and hedgehog pathways. In females, methylation changes affect genes implicated in the regulation of the lysine (H3K36) demethylation and arginine hydroxylation. Did not assess cardiac function and no change in heart size.
[88] mice (C57BL/6J) adult male testes 10 male mice per group; 50 mice total 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg/day cadmium via intraperitoneally injection for 35 days Global DNA methylation of LINE-1 via bisulfite conversion/pyrosequencing Global DNA methylation analysis of line-1: ↓ DNA methylation with increasing exposure dose to Cd in the testis. Two highest doses decreased body weight. Highest dose reduced fertility.
[38] mice (C57BL/6J) pregnant females blood and liver in offspring (F1) post-natal day 21 7 males and 7 females 32 ppm lead in drinking water and lactation for 2 weeks prior to mating and 3 weeks after birth (through weaning) Genome-wide DNA methylation via Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (EERBS) Genome-wide DNA methylation: Many tissue-specific and sex-specific DMRs, few differentially methylated sites directly overlapped between blood and liver, more ↓ DNA methylation than ↑ methylation in male blood, other tissue equal ↓ and ↑ DNA methylation, DMRs annotated to 5 genes - Prdm16, Hjurp, Cdh23, Bc1, and Arid1b – in common across combination of tissues and sex; Methylation of imprinted genes: Arid1b, Pde10a differentially methylated across female liver and blood, Smoc2, Trappc9 differentially methylated across male liver and blood, Arid1b differentially methylated across male and female blood and liver; Pathway analysis: Enrichment for pathways involved in embryonic organ development in female tissue and liver and male  None
[45] mice (CD1) pregnant females preimplantation embryos 349 control embryos; 419 treated embryos (total used in methylation analysis unclear) 32 mg/L cadmium in drinking water for 2 days Global DNA methylation of LINE-1 DNA methylation of imprinted genes Peg3 and H19 via bisulfite conversion/pyrosequencing Global DNA methylation analysis of LINE-1: no change; DNA methylation of imprinted genes Peg3 and H19: H19 ↓ DNA methylation and no change in Peg3; Histone modifications: ↓ H4K8ac and H4K12ac and ↑ HDAC1. Elevated embryo death and fragmentation.
[89] zebrafish Adult males and adult females F0 and F1 sperm, embryos 10-12 adult males and 50 to 60 embryos per treatment group used in methylation analysis 0, 0.078 μM (5 μg/L), and 0.156 μM(10 μg/L) copper in fresh water for 21 days Genome-wide DNA methylation via Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing (WGBS) Genome-wide DNA methylation: ↑ global DNA methylation, differentially methylated regions in Pmpcb, Crebl2 and Tab2 promoters also show corresponding changes in gene transcription in F0 and F1 spermatozoa. F1 offspring of the 0.156 μM group displayed developmental defects, such as shorter body and head and eye hypoplasia.

The studies profiled here were extremely diverse in every aspect. The metal exposures evaluated in these studies included: cadmium (7 studies), lead (5 studies), titanium dioxide (1 study), uranium (1 study), and arsenic (1 study), with an additional study that evaluated a mixture of lead and cadmium exposure (1 study) (Figure 2). Exposure methods included drinking water, lactation, gavage, intraperitoneally injection and inhalation. Multiple in vivo experimental models were used including mice (C57BL/6J, CD1, NIH/OlaHsd), rats (Sprague-Dawley, Wistar, Long-Evans), drosophila, zebrafish, and Nile tilapia fish. The target tissues evaluated for DNA methylation in the studies varied considerably. Liver (5) and testes (4) were the most common targets, with additional tissues including spermatozoa (2), brain (2), blood (2), embryos (2), kidney (1), ovaries (1), heart (1), and muscle (1). DNA methylation was the principal epigenetic endpoint measured in all toxicology studies, though most of the studies evaluated multiple epigenetic endpoints. Methyl groups are added to DNA using DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) enzymes, and studies measure levels or activity of DNMT to understand regulation of DNA methylation. Expression DNMTs and ten-eleven translocation (TET) methylcytosine dioxygenases were often measured as secondary epigenetic endpoints.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Summary of toxicology-based metals exposure and DNA methylation studies published between January 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022.

Assessment methods of DNA methylation in exposure toxicology studies

DNA methylation was the primary epigenetic endpoint measured in the exposure toxicology studies, though there were considerable differences in the assessment methods. Specific DNA methylation endpoints included global, genome-wide, and locus-specific. Approximately half of the studies reported results for global DNA methylation, which represents overall degree of methylated cytosine compared to total cytosine content [33]. Studies reporting changes in global DNA methylation used colorimetric, ELISA, or luminometric microplate-based assays, or bisulfite conversion/pyrosequencing of LINE-1, a repetitive DNA retrotransposon used as a proxy for global DNA methylation because it constitutes 17% of human genome [34]. The other half of included toxicology studies evaluated genome-wide DNA methylation with either whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), an expensive method that covers DNA methylation across the entire genome [35], or enhanced reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (EERBS), a more streamlined method that focuses coverage on a large number of biologically relevant loci. Lastly, a handful of profiled studies evaluated the DNA methylation at individual gene loci, primarily focusing on imprinted genes.

Differential DNA methylation in liver in metal exposure toxicology studies

As a major organ, the liver is the primary site of xenobiotic metabolism in vivo, making it a prominent target for metal exposure toxicity [36]. In the studies profiled here, the liver was the most evaluated target tissue for changes in DNA methylation. Only two studies evaluated the same metal (lead) and target tissues (liver and blood), using the same model (mice) [37,38]. In both studies, maternal mice were exposed to lead through drinking water 2 weeks prior to pregnancy, during pregnancy, and through weaning [37,38]. Male and female base-pair resolution DNA methylation was measured in offspring at 3 weeks old in one study [38] and 5 months old in the other study [37]. Although, both studies had hundreds of tissue- and sex-specific differentially methylated regions in lead-exposed tissues compared to controls, there was little in common between the results reported. For example, one of the goals of the two studies was to determine if DNA methylation changes in the liver corresponded to those in paired blood samples. In young mice, there were few differentially methylated regions in common between blood and liver, however, in the adult mice, there were hundreds of differentially methylated regions in common between the two tissues. Moreover, each study had differentially methylated regions at different imprinted genes in common between blood and liver: young mice had Arid1b, Pde10a, Smoc2, Trappc9, and adult mice had Bargain, Peg12, Rasgrf1, Snrpn, and different enriched pathways. Together, the results of these two studies demonstrated that perinatal lead exposure caused changes in liver and blood DNA methylation in a dynamic manner over time, even after lead exposure had ceased.

In addition to the two studies, several other studies evaluated exposure induced differential DNA methylation in the liver. One study demonstrated that cadmium exposure in adult rats caused statically significant lower DNA methylation in liver gene promoter regions [39], while a second study demonstrated that cadmium exposure in juvenile tilapia fish caused significant time- and dose-dependent lower global DNA methylation [40]. These findings suggest that cadmium exposure may cause a trend toward lower DNA methylation in functional regions of the genome, with potential impacts on gene expression.

Differential DNA methylation in brain and embryotic tissue in metal exposure toxicology studies

In addition to the liver, multiple toxicology evaluated exposure-induced differential DNA methylation in other target tissues. Neurotoxicity is one of the most studied adverse health outcomes of lead exposure. Two studies evaluated the effects of perinatal lead exposure on DNA methylation in different parts of the rodent brain [41,42]. One study evaluated neurons isolated from the mouse neuronal cortex [41], and the other study evaluated bulk tissue from the hippocampus [42]. The neuron study reported a trend towards lower DNA methylation in gene promoter regions in the cortex [41]. In contrast, the hippocampus study reported higher DNA methylation in gene promoter regions of the hippocampus [42]. The results of these two studies demonstrated that exposure to metals may cause variable changes in DNA methylation within different regions from the same organ.

Besides the brain, early embryonic target tissue was evaluated in several studies for exposure-induced differential DNA methylation. During early embryonic development, DNA methylation undergoes multiple windows of reprogramming, making embryos particularly vulnerable to exposure-induced alternations to DNA methylation, which can last into adulthood and impact chronic disease risk [43]. One study reported lower methylation in 12-hour cadmium-exposed zebrafish embryos that returned back to baseline by 24-hour exposure [44]. Another study reported no change to the global DNA methylation status of LINE-1 in preimplantation mouse embryos perinatally exposed to cadmium [45]. The findings of these two studies suggest that cadmium exposure may not significantly affect global DNA methylation, however, more comprehensive studies using base-pair resolution methods and cell type adjusted methods are needed to further understand the effects of cadmium on embryonic tissue DNA methylation changes.

Effects of metal exposure on multi-generational changes in DNA methylation in toxicology studies

Multi-generational epigenetic studies are conducted with exposure in one generation and epigenetic markers measured in subsequent generations. Maternal (F0) exposure to toxicants during pregnancy can directly cause changes in DNA methylation and traits in the offspring (F1) generation [46]. The F2 generation was also directly exposed to the toxicant through germ cells, and changes have been observed [46]. Some research examines the F3 and subsequent generations that were never directly exposed to the toxicant. Reflected in current research, there has been considerable interest in studying effects of maternal metal exposure on DNA methylation patterns in adult offspring and subsequent generations. Half of the studies profiled here evaluated multigeneration effects of metal exposure. Although the variability in study designs makes it hard to draw specific conclusions about the findings, these studies reported some type of alterations to DNA methylation resulting from maternal exposure to metals. Most of the studies only involve evaluation of epigenetic changes in the F1 generation, however, several studies extend findings to the F2 and F3 generations. For example, in response to arsenic exposure in rats, lower global testes DNA methylation was observed in F0, higher testes DNA methylation was observed in F2 and F3, and higher ovary DNA methylation was observed in F3 [47]. Collectively, the current studies have demonstrated metal exposures are capable of causing multigenerational epigenetic alterations, however, the effects of such alterations on the health trajectory over the life course of individuals in future generations is not yet understood.

Summary, critical gaps, & future directions

Metals exposure and epigenetics research is in a period of rapid growth. A critical mass of studies and research groups are active in the area, which has generated breadth in the timing and type of exposure measures, as well as the timing and tissue of DNA methylation measures. Studies from the last three years offer compelling findings in their study population or model system. In recent human epidemiology studies, there is most evidence for lead and cadmium exposure during pregnancy and DNA methylation differences in tissues collected at birth (cord blood and placenta tissue). In recent toxicology studies, there is most evidence for prenatal lead and cadmium exposure causing differences in DNA methylation in liver from rodent models. Building on these successes, we identify areas of future development to advance the field.

The most pressing and perplexing question in metals exposure epigenetics, and indeed in environmental epigenetics more broadly, is the molecular basis for highly reproducible, sequence-specific epigenetic differences. Metals may have a generalized response on epigenetic modifying enzymes. For examples, exposures, including some metals, that generate reactive oxygen species can deplete available methyl groups [48] or oxidize DNA which alters methyl binding domains [49]. Metals can also influence levels of DNMT enzymes [50] and cadmium can non-competitively bind DNMT, changing enzyme function [51]. Metabolism of metals, particularly arsenic, may also influence the availability of the methyl substrate for DNA methylation [12]. These types of epigenetic enzyme-based mechanisms would be expected to produce widespread or global differences in DNA methylation, which have been observed [50]. However, they fail to account for the highly sequence specific differences in DNA methylation that are also observed with metals exposures. The availability of sequences for action by epigenetic enzymes (based on the presence or absence of transcription factors or histone occupancy) varies by developmental timing and tissue and this has been hypothesized to dictate the exposure-epigenetic specificity [52,53]. Similarly, while groups of environment-related DNA methylation differences are concurrently associated with gene expression differences [54], and new findings suggest epigenetic factors may influence cellular cytoskeletal structures [55], the range of potential consequences of environment-related DNA methylation differences have not been fully explored. Early life epigenetic programming may have lagged effects in adulthood [56], requiring longitudinal investigations of consequences. Targeted, sequence-specific epigenetic editing techniques [57,58], such as using piRNA to edit DNA methylation [59], CRISPR to modulate chromatin marks or perturb DNA [60], or the DNA binding proteins zinc finger nucleases and transcriptional activator like effector nucleases [61] are emerging. Experimental toxicologic work using these types of techniques will revolutionize the biologic understanding of the consequences of altered DNA methylation. Understanding the biologic basis for reproducible, sequence-specific signatures of metals exposure and their consequences will catapult the field forward.

There are numerous complementary areas of future development in the fields of metals exposure modeling and in epigenetic measurement. With respect to metals exposure, especially for essential metals where adverse effects are expected at both low and high exposures, we need to incorporate non-linear dose-response curves. In epidemiology studies, the choice of biological media for exposure assessment is a function of important considerations, including metabolism and half-life of metals, directness of inference to biological processes according to tissue specificity, and invasiveness towards human subjects sampling. Additionally, some metals, such as arsenic may be conjugated or modified upon metabolism within the human body. As such, different species of metals may be quantified and afford inference of the metal at different stages of the metabolism process. Metals exposures occur in combination and can influence absorption and metabolism of each other. Advanced methods for modeling exposure mixtures has been applied [16], though will be challenged by features of complex exposure matrices, including sparsity of effect estimate signals within small sample sizes, collinearity between exposures, and potential high-dimensional interactions between exposures. Inclusion of multiple offspring generations of model systems may yield important insight into potential transgenerational effects attributable to metals exposures. Multigenerational studies should take particular care when interpreting potential effects, as up to three generations may be directly exposed to the parent chemical. Future work may also incorporate genetic polymorphisms that influence metals metabolism, and in turn may modify the relationship between metals exposure and epigenetics.

In the area of epigenetic markers, repeated longitudinal epigenetic measures will help answer questions of the persistence and timing of exposure and epigenetic associations. The development of human DNA methylation microarrays enabled standardization of measurement across populations, and the new mouse DNA methylation microarray and the new custom mammalian array [62] should enable new opportunities for cross-toxicology study investigation. Notably, standard laboratory methods collapse all DNA modifications (methylation, hydroxymethylation, formylation, carboxylation), though findings are often attributed to the most abundant DNA modification, which is DNA methylation. Studies highlighted here have largely focused on DNA methylation for utilitarian purposes (stability of the marker in archived samples), though biologically DNA methylation is expected to follow histone modifications [63]. Histone modifications are expected to be rapid responses to environmental conditions with more immediate impacts on gene expression, while DNA methylation provides longer term maintenance of environmental signals [64]. Earlier environmental epigenetic influences may be captured by using additional epigenetic markers, including histone modifications. Measures of hydroxymethylation may also be considered, particularly early in development or in brain or placenta tissues where the marker is most abundant [65]. Rapid expansion in technology to measure multi-omics data frames in combination with enhanced exposure assessment will yield new opportunities. Improvements in the areas of metals exposure modeling and expansion on epigenetic markers under consideration or standardization of epigenetic measures will build on the existing foundational research.

Additionally, advances in the field of metals and epigenetics together will continue. The rigor of associations between metals exposures and epigenetics is enhanced by testing triangulation using diverse study designs and is a major current strength. This includes testing findings across toxicologic model systems for evolutionary conservation and across diverse human study samples with wide ranges of exposure for assessing generalizability or specificity of signals. Statistically, we have noted that several the current studies lack replication testing and are underpowered for epigenome-wide assessment. As with any genome-wide analysis with relatively small effect sizes and small sample sizes, false positive associations are expected. It is time for partnerships and replication testing to increase the impact and rigor of the research. Larger and more collaborative epidemiologic studies which involve replication testing or meta-analysis, akin to the recent mercury study in the PACE consortium [19], are critically needed. There is also high potential for these collaborative meta-analyses of metals and epigenetics through the Toxicant Exposures and Responses by Genomic and Epigenomic Regulators of Transcription (TaRGET II) consortium [66], the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium [67], and the Cohorts of Heart and Aging Research in Genetic Epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium [68]. When testing associations between metals exposures and epigenetics, we need to be clear about the limits of the inferences we can make (association, biomarker, mechanism, cell composition marker) [69]. For example, reproducible epigenetic signatures of metals may be assessed as biomarker of exposure, as has been effectively demonstrated with smoking epigenetic signatures [70] and follow up questions can include the persistence and cross-tissue applicability of the biomarker signal. Currently, human studies lack evidence of a causal relationship between metals exposure and epigenetic signatures, but toxicologic studies are advancing this area. Epigenetic signatures may be a marker of metals exposure-induced altered cell type composition, particularly in toxicology studies where cell type has generally not been adjusted for, which could be an important biologic effect of exposures [71]. Continued and expanded collaboration across metals and epigenetics studies will enable the assessment of reproducible findings, which will open opportunities for using these signatures in biomarker or mechanistic studies.

Conclusion

In summary, metals exposures that are common in populations are associated with epigenetic markers, specifically DNA methylation. To date, epigenome-wide studies have largely investigated cadmium and lead exposure measured in blood and observed sequence specific differences in DNA methylation, though replication testing is needed. It is an exciting era for metals and epigenetics studies with emerging methods for multi-metal exposure assessment, reproducible epigenome-wide DNA methylation measures, and pipelines to facilitate collaborative testing. The next several years are expected to bring further rapid advancements.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Funding

Support for Dr. Elkin was provided by NIH award number T32 DK071212. Mr. Higgins was supported by NIH award number R01 AG067592-01S1. Support for Dr. Aung was provided by NIH award number P30 ES030284. Dr. Bakulski was supported by NIH awards: R01 AG070897, R01 AG067592, R35 ES031686, R01 MD013299, and R01 ES025531.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Compliance with ethical standards

This article did not involve human participants or animal models.

References cited

  • 1.Bakulski KM, Seo YA, Hickman RC, Brandt D, Vadari HS, Hu H, et al. Heavy Metals Exposure and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76:1215–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cosselman KE, Navas-Acien A, Kaufman JD. Environmental factors in cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:627–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vrijheid M, Casas M, Gascon M, Valvi D, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Environmental pollutants and child health—A review of recent concerns. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2016;219:331–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp Suppl. 2012;101:133–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Argüello JM, Raimunda D, González-Guerrero M. Metal transport across biomembranes: emerging models for a distinct chemistry. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:13510–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lewicka I, Kocyłowski R, Grzesiak M, Gaj Z, Oszukowski P, Suliburska J. Selected trace elements concentrations in pregnancy and their possible role - literature review. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88:509–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Milnerowicz H, Ściskalska M, Dul M. Pro-inflammatory effects of metals in persons and animals exposed to tobacco smoke. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015;29:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ruiz-Hernandez A, Kuo C-C, Rentero-Garrido P, Tang W-Y, Redon J, Ordovas JM, et al. Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bakulski KM, Halladay A, Hu VW, Mill J, Fallin MD. Epigenetic research in neuropsychiatric disorders: the “tissue issue”. Current behavioral neuroscience reports. 2016;3:264–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng T-F, Choudhuri S, Muldoon-Jacobs K. Epigenetic targets of some toxicologically relevant metals: a review of the literature. J Appl Toxicol. 2012;32:643–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fragou D, Fragou A, Kouidou S, Njau S, Kovatsi L. Epigenetic mechanisms in metal toxicity. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2011;21:343–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martinez-Zamudio R, Ha HC. Environmental epigenetics in metal exposure. Epigenetics. 2011;6:820–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ryu H-W, Lee DH, Won H-R, Kim KH, Seong YJ, Kwon SH. Influence of toxicologically relevant metals on human epigenetic regulation. Toxicol Res. 2015;31:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rygiel CA, Dolinoy DC, Perng W, Jones TR, Solano M, Hu H, et al. Trimester-Specific Associations of Prenatal Lead Exposure With Infant Cord Blood DNA Methylation at Birth. Epigenet Insights. 2020/August/01 ed. 2020;13:2516865720938669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Park J, Kim J, Kim E, Kim WJ, Won S. Prenatal lead exposure and cord blood DNA methylation in the Korean Exposome Study. Environ Res. 2021/January/31 ed. 2021;195:110767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bozack AK, Rifas-Shiman SL, Coull BA, Baccarelli AA, Wright RO, Amarasiriwardena C, et al. Prenatal metal exposure, cord blood DNA methylation and persistence in childhood: an epigenome-wide association study of 12 metals. Clin Epigenetics. 2021;13:208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *17. Kennedy E, Everson TM, Punshon T, Jackson BP, Hao K, Lambertini L, et al. Copper associates with differential methylation in placentae from two US birth cohorts. Epigenetics. 2020;15:215–30. This recent epidemiology study is notable because it uses a meta-analysis approach to identify replicated associations between copper exposure and placenta DNA methylation.
  • *18. Bozack AK, Boileau P, Wei L, Hubbard AE, Sille FCM, Ferreccio C, et al. Exposure to arsenic at different life-stages and DNA methylation meta-analysis in buccal cells and leukocytes. Environ Health. 2021/July/11 ed. 2021;20:79. This recent epidemiology study is notable because it uses a meta-analysis approach to identify replicated associations between arsenic exposure and DNA methylation in two tissues.
  • *19. Lozano M, Yousefi P, Broberg K, Soler-Blasco R, Miyashita C, Pesce G, et al. DNA methylation changes associated with prenatal mercury exposure: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies from PACE consortium. Environ Res. 2022;204:112093. This recent epidemiology study is notable because it uses a meta-analysis approach to identify replicated associations between mercury exposure and newborn blood DNA methylation.
  • 20.Felix JF, Joubert BR, Baccarelli AA, Sharp GC, Almqvist C, Annesi-Maesano I, et al. Cohort Profile: Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics (PACE) Consortium. Int J Epidemiol. 2017/October/13 ed. 2018;47:22–23u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Heiss JA, Téllez-Rojo MM, Estrada-Gutiérrez G, Schnaas L, Amarasiriwardena C, Baccarelli AA, et al. Prenatal lead exposure and cord blood DNA methylation in PROGRESS: an epigenome-wide association study. Environ Epigenet. 2020/December/17 ed. 2020;6:dvaa014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lin C-Y, Lee H-L, Hwang Y-T, Huang P-C, Wang C, Sung F-C, et al. Urinary heavy metals, DNA methylation, and subclinical atherosclerosis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;204:111039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Montrose L, Goodrich JM, Morishita M, Kochmanski J, Klaver Z, Cavalcante R, et al. Neonatal Lead (Pb) Exposure and DNA Methylation Profiles in Dried Bloodspots. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020/September/23 ed. 2020;17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yohannes YB, Nakayama SM, Yabe J, Nakata H, Toyomaki H, Kataba A, et al. Blood lead levels and aberrant DNA methylation of the ALAD and p16 gene promoters in children exposed to environmental-lead. Environ Res. 2020;188:109759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang X-X, He Z, Feng B, Shao H. An epigenome-wide DNA methylation study of workers with an occupational exposure to lead. J Appl Toxicol. 2019;39:1311–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Domingo-Relloso A, Riffo-Campos AL, Haack K, Rentero-Garrido P, Ladd-Acosta C, Fallin DM, et al. Cadmium, Smoking, and Human Blood DNA Methylation Profiles in Adults from the Strong Heart Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128:067005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Feng L, Guo X, Li T, Yao C, Xia H, Jiang Z, et al. Novel DNA methylation biomarkers for hexavalent chromium exposure: an epigenome-wide analysis. Epigenomics. 2020;12:221–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bozack AK, Domingo-Relloso A, Haack K, Gamble MV, Tellez-Plaza M, Umans JG, et al. Locus-Specific Differential DNA Methylation and Urinary Arsenic: An Epigenome-Wide Association Study in Blood among Adults with Low-to-Moderate Arsenic Exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128:067015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Domingo-Relloso A, Bozack A, Kiihl S, Rodriguez-Hernandez Z, Rentero-Garrido P, Casasnovas JA, et al. Arsenic exposure and human blood DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation profiles in two diverse populations from Bangladesh and Spain. Environmental Research. 2022;204:112021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zeng Z, Huo X, Zhang Y, Hylkema MN, Wu Y, Xu X. Differential DNA methylation in newborns with maternal exposure to heavy metals from an e-waste recycling area. Environmental Research. 2019;171:536–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *31. Aung MT, M. Bakulski K, Feinberg JI, F. Dou J, D. Meeker J, Mukherjee B, et al. Maternal blood metal concentrations and whole blood DNA methylation during pregnancy in the Early Autism Risk Longitudinal Investigation (EARLI). Epigenetics. 2021;1–16. This recent epidemiology study is notable because it considers multiple metals exposures for association with cord blood DNA methylation and tests for replication of previously published associations.
  • 32.Nafea OE, El-Korashi LA, Gehad MH, Yousif YM, Zake LG. Association between blood aluminum and beta-2 receptor gene methylation with childhood asthma control. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2020;39:1301–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vryer R, Saffery R. What’s in a name? Context-dependent significance of “global” methylation measures in human health and disease. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cordaux R, Batzer MA. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:691–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Harris RA, Wang T, Coarfa C, Nagarajan RP, Hong C, Downey SL, et al. Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1097–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gu X, Manautou JE. Molecular mechanisms underlying chemical liver injury. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2012;14:e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *37. Svoboda LK, Neier K, Wang K, Cavalcante RG, Rygiel CA, Tsai Z, et al. Tissue and sex-specific programming of DNA methylation by perinatal lead exposure: implications for environmental epigenetics studies. Epigenetics. 2021;16:1102–22. This recent toxicology study is notable because it details a coordinated evaluation of changes in DNA methylation resulting from perinatal in two tissues, liver, and blood. The purpose of this coordinated evaluation is to test weather DNA methylation in blood can be used as a proxy for changes in DNA methylation in liver, allowing for a potentially less invasive biomarker for liver epigenetic changes. The study also evaluated sex-specific DNA methylation.
  • 38.Wang K, Liu S, Svoboda LK, Rygiel CA, Neier K, Jones TR, et al. Tissue- and Sex-Specific DNA Methylation Changes in Mice Perinatally Exposed to Lead (Pb). Front Genet. 2020;11:840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *39. Ren C, Ren L, Yan J, Bai Z, Zhang L, Zhang H, et al. Cadmium causes hepatopathy by changing the status of DNA methylation in the metabolic pathway. Toxicol Lett. 2021;340:101–13. This recent toxicology study is notable because it used whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, the gold standard method. This study also evaluated visual and functional changes in the liver corresponding with DNA methylation changes in the same tissue.
  • 40.Hu F, Yin L, Dong F, Zheng M, Zhao Y, Fu S, et al. Effects of long-term cadmium exposure on growth, antioxidant defense and DNA methylation in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquat Toxicol. 2021;241:106014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dou JF, Farooqui Z, Faulk CD, Barks AK, Jones T, Dolinoy DC, et al. Perinatal Lead (Pb) Exposure and Cortical Neuron-Specific DNA Methylation in Male Mice. Genes (Basel). 2019;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *42. Hong T, Li S-M, Jia B, Huang Y, Shu K, Yuan K-W, et al. DNA methylation changes in the hippocampus of learning and memory disorder offspring rats of lead exposure during pregnant and lactation period. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:1059–69. This recent toxicology study is notable because in addition to evaluating changes in DNA methylation in the hippocampus, functional learning and memory tests were also carried out, directly connecting DNA methylation changes with functional outcomes specific to the relevant tissue.
  • 43.Breton-Larrivée M, Elder E, McGraw S. DNA methylation, environmental exposures and early embryo development. Anim Reprod. 2019;16:465–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bian X, Gao Y. DNA methylation and gene expression alterations in zebrafish embryos exposed to cadmium. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:30101–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhu J, Huang Z, Yang F, Zhu M, Cao J, Chen J, et al. Cadmium disturbs epigenetic modification and induces DNA damage in mouse preimplantation embryos. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;219:112306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tuscher JJ, Day JJ. Multigenerational epigenetic inheritance: One step forward, two generations back. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;132:104591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nava-Rivera LE, Betancourt-Martínez ND, Lozoya-Martínez R, Carranza-Rosales P, Guzmán-Delgado NE, Carranza-Torres IE, et al. Transgenerational effects in DNA methylation, genotoxicity and reproductive phenotype by chronic arsenic exposure. Sci Rep. 2021;11:8276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kreuz S, Fischle W. Oxidative stress signaling to chromatin in health and disease. Epigenomics. 2016;8:843–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Valinluck V, Tsai HH, Rogstad DK, Burdzy A, Bird A, Sowers LC. Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res. 2004/August/11 ed. 2004;32:4100–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sanchez OF, Lee J, Yu King Hing N, Kim S-E, Freeman JL, Yuan C. Lead (Pb) exposure reduces global DNA methylation level by non-competitive inhibition and alteration of dnmt expression. Metallomics. 2017;9:149–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Takiguchi M, Achanzar WE, Qu W, Li G, Waalkes MP. Effects of cadmium on DNA-(Cytosine-5) methyltransferase activity and DNA methylation status during cadmium-induced cellular transformation. Exp Cell Res. 2003;286:355–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Collings CK, Anderson JN. Links between DNA methylation and nucleosome occupancy in the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2017;10:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Martin EM, Fry RC. Environmental Influences on the Epigenome: Exposure- Associated DNA Methylation in Human Populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:309–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Joubert BR, Felix JF, Yousefi P, Bakulski KM, Just AC, Breton C, et al. DNA Methylation in Newborns and Maternal Smoking in Pregnancy: Genome-wide Consortium Meta-analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2016/April/05 ed. 2016;98:680–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Walker C, Burggren W. Remodeling the epigenome and (epi)cytoskeleton: a new paradigm for co-regulation by methylation. J Exp Biol. 2020;223:jeb220632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Treviño LS, Dong J, Kaushal A, Katz TA, Jangid RK, Robertson MJ, et al. Epigenome environment interactions accelerate epigenomic aging and unlock metabolically restricted epigenetic reprogramming in adulthood. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.de Groote ML, Verschure PJ, Rots MG. Epigenetic Editing: targeted rewriting of epigenetic marks to modulate expression of selected target genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:10596–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gjaltema RAF, Rots MG. Advances of epigenetic editing. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2020;57:75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Perera BPU, Svoboda L, Dolinoy DC. Genomic Tools for Environmental Epigenetics and Implications for Public Health. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2019;18:27–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nakamura M, Gao Y, Dominguez AA, Qi LS. CRISPR technologies for precise epigenome editing. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23:11–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yim YY, Teague CD, Nestler EJ. In vivo locus-specific editing of the neuroepigenome. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21:471–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Arneson A, Haghani A, Thompson MJ, Pellegrini M, Kwon SB, Vu H, et al. A mammalian methylation array for profiling methylation levels at conserved sequences. Nat Commun. 2022;13:783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stewart KR, Veselovska L, Kim J, Huang J, Saadeh H, Tomizawa S, et al. Dynamic changes in histone modifications precede de novo DNA methylation in oocytes. Genes & development. 2015;29:2449–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Przybilla J, Buske P, Binder H, Galle J. Histone modifications control DNA methylation profiles during ageing and tumour expansion. Frontiers in Life Science. 2013;7:31–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wen L, Tang F. Genomic distribution and possible functions of DNA hydroxymethylation in the brain. Genomics. 2014;104:341–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang T, Pehrsson EC, Purushotham D, Li D, Zhuo X, Zhang B, et al. The NIEHS TaRGET II Consortium and environmental epigenomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:225–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Breton CV, Landon R, Kahn LG, Enlow MB, Peterson AK, Bastain T, et al. Exploring the evidence for epigenetic regulation of environmental influences on child health across generations. Communications Biology. 2021;4:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Colicino E, Marioni R, Ward-Caviness C, Gondalia R, Guan W, Chen B, et al. Blood DNA methylation sites predict death risk in a longitudinal study of 12, 300 individuals. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:14092–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bakulski KM, Fallin MD. Epigenetic epidemiology: promises for public health research. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2014;55:171–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Reese SE, Zhao S, Wu MC, Joubert BR, Parr CL, Håberg SE, et al. DNA methylation score as a biomarker in newborns for sustained maternal smoking during pregnancy. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017;125:760–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Campbell KA, Colacino JA, Park SK, Bakulski KM. Cell types in environmental epigenetic studies: biological and epidemiological frameworks. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2020;1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yang W, Guo Y, Ni W, Tian T, Jin L, Liu J, et al. Hypermethylation of WNT3A gene and non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate in association with in utero exposure to lead: A mediation analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2021;208:111415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yu M, Zhou X, Ju L, Yu M, Gao X, Zhang M, et al. Characteristics of iron status, oxidation response, and DNA methylation profile in response to occupational iron oxide nanoparticles exposure. Toxicol Ind Health. 2020;36:170–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ha F, Li N, Long C, Zheng P, Hu G, Jia G, et al. The Effect of Global DNA Methylation on PDCD5 Expression in the PBMC of Occupational Chromate Exposed Workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2021;63:600–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Issah I, Arko-Mensah J, Rozek LS, Zarins KR, Agyekum TP, Dwomoh D, et al. Global DNA (LINE-1) methylation is associated with lead exposure and certain job tasks performed by electronic waste workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94:1931–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Childebayeva A, Goodrich JM, Chesterman N, Leon-Velarde F, Rivera-Ch M, Kiyamu M, et al. Blood lead levels in Peruvian adults are associated with proximity to mining and DNA methylation. Environment International. 2021;155:106587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lee J-E, Kim H-R, Lee M, Kim N-H, Wang K-M, Lee S, et al. Smoking-Related DNA Methylation is Differentially Associated with Cadmium Concentration in Blood. Biochem Genet. 2020;58:617–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nishizawa-Jotaki S, Sakurai K, Eguchi A, Tanabe H, Watanabe M, Mori C. Association between mercury in cord serum and sex-specific DNA methylation in cord tissues. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. Cambridge University Press; 2021;12:124–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li Z, Guo C, Li X, Wang Z, Wu J, Qian Y, et al. Associations between metal exposure and global DNA methylation in potentially affected people in E-Waste recycling sites in Taizhou City, China. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;711:135100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Montes-Castro N, Alvarado-Cruz I, Torres-Sánchez L, García-Aguiar I, Barrera-Hernández A, Escamilla-Núñez C, et al. Prenatal exposure to metals modified DNA methylation and the expression of antioxidant- and DNA defense-related genes in newborns in an urban area. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 2019;55:110–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *81. Guan D-L, Ding R-R, Hu X-Y, Yang X-R, Xu S-Q, Gu W, et al. Cadmium-induced genome-wide DNA methylation changes in growth and oxidative metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:356. This recent toxicology study is notable because it used whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, the gold standard method. This study also directly connected gene-specific DNA methylation changes to measured gene expression changes.
  • 82.Legendre A, Elmhiri G, Gloaguen C, Magneron V, Kereselidze D, Saci N, et al. Multigenerational exposure to uranium changes morphometric parameters and global DNA methylation in rat sperm. C R Biol. 2019;342:175–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ma Y, Guo Y, Ye H, Huang K, Lv Z, Ke Y. Different effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles instillation in young and adult mice on DNA methylation related with lung inflammation and fibrosis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;176:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tachibana K, Kawazoe S, Onoda A, Umezawa M, Takeda K. Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profile in the Mouse Brain. Front Toxicol. 2021;3:705910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *85. Nakayama SMM, Nakata H, Ikenaka Y, Yabe J, Oroszlany B, Yohannes YB, et al. One year exposure to Cd- and Pb-contaminated soil causes metal accumulation and alteration of global DNA methylation in rats. Environ Pollut. 2019;252:1267–76. This recent toxicology study is notable because it used the unique exposure method of contaminated soil for a long period of time (1 year). It also evaluated a mixture of lead and cadmium.
  • 86.Saintilnord WN, Tenlep SYN, Preston JD, Duregon E, DeRouchey JE, Unrine JM, et al. Chronic Exposure to Cadmium Induces Differential Methylation in Mice Spermatozoa. Toxicol Sci. 2021;180:262–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Svoboda LK, Wang K, Jones TR, Colacino JA, Sartor MA, Dolinoy DC. Sex-Specific Alterations in Cardiac DNA Methylation in Adult Mice by Perinatal Lead Exposure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:E577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang X, Wang M, Zeng L, Su P. Hypomethylation of LINE-1 retrotransposons is associated with cadmium-induced testicular injury. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27:40749–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tai Z, Guan P, Zhang T, Liu W, Li L, Wu Y, et al. Effects of parental environmental copper stress on offspring development: DNA methylation modification and responses of differentially methylated region-related genes in transcriptional expression. J Hazard Mater. 2022;424:127600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES