Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2023 Mar 24;16(3):601–606. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.601-606

Expression profiling of heat shock protein genes in whole blood of Romosinuano cattle breed

Juan Camilo Taborda-Charris 1, Roy Rodríguez-Hernández 2, María Paula Herrera-Sánchez 2, Heinner Fabian Uribe-García 1, Rafael J Otero-Arroyo 3,4, Juan Sebastian Naranjo-Gomez 1, Kelly Johanna Lozano-Villegas 1,2, Iang Schroniltgen Rondón-Barragán 1,2,
PMCID: PMC10082753  PMID: 37041848

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Heat shock proteins are highly conserved proteins that work as molecular chaperones expressed in response to thermal stress. This study aimed to determine the expression profile of genes related to the heat stress response in whole blood obtained from the Romosinuano creole breed.

Materials and Methods:

Real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to analyze the transcript of hsp90, hsp70, hsp60, and hsf1 in the whole blood of Romosinuano under different temperature-humidity indices (THIs).

Results:

The expression levels of the hsp70 and hsf1 genes at the high-THI level were higher (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0003, respectively) than those at the low-THI level. In addition, no differences in the expression levels of the hsp60 and hsP90 genes were detected between the two THIs.

Conclusion:

The overexpression of hsf1 and hsp70 genes play an important role in protecting cells from damage induced by heat stress.

Keywords: climate change, external environment, heat shock proteins, heat stress, mRNA, temperature-humidity index

Introduction

Climate change affects food production in tropical and subtropical regions, especially dairy and meat production [1, 2]. Adverse weather conditions limit agricultural and livestock production development and heat stress is one of the main problems in animals raised outdoors and indoors [37]. Heat stress in livestock is caused when environmental conditions challenge the animal’s thermoregulatory mechanisms. It is defined as the increment in body temperature that leads to a physiological response to compensate for the heat gain, avoiding a state of hyperthermia [6, 8, 9]. Heat stress has been associated with decreased milk and meat production in cattle. It has deleterious effects on reproduction and immunity due to changes in animal metabolism and physiology and is responsible for the lower quality of derived dairy and meat products [1, 8, 10, 11]. In animal husbandry, the temperature-humidity index (THI) is a parameter that considers the environmental conditions that cause heat stress, including relative humidity and environmental temperature [12]. THI allows animal classification into mild heat stress, moderate heat stress, and severe heat stress, used in performing retrospective studies, heat stress economic studies, and farm heat stress abatement strategies [8, 12].

The use of novel omics technologies is becoming increasingly common in animal production. Omics technologies are related to studying the collection of molecules, biological processes, or physiologic functions and structures as systems [13]. Transcriptomics and proteomics allow the study of animal responses at the molecular level when subjected to certain factors, including environmental conditions and diet [14]. Heat stress in cattle can be determined by identifying proteins and genes that increase their expression under heat stress, such as heat shock proteins (HSP) [5, 15, 16]. Body temperature above the threshold induces gene expression in the biosynthesis of HSP and their expression is different in each cattle breed depending on external factors [1720]. In general, the overexpression of HSP protects against hyperthermia, circulatory shock, and cerebral ischemia during heat shock, which plays a significant role in cell protection [21]. HSP has chaperone activity that ensures the folding, unfolding, and refolding of proteins denatured by stress [22].

The survivability of cattle in the tropical environment depends on the adaptations developed throughout successive exposition to the continuous stressor, in our case, cattle raising in grazing in the tropical and subtropical regions [23]. The Romosinuano creole breed from Colombia is a breed that stands out for tolerating heat and different humidity conditions and exhibits remarkable characteristics of adaptation, such as high fertility, weight gain, and longevity, which give it an advantage over other breeds in tropical conditions [24, 25]. It has been reported that Romosinuano bovine embryos showed a better response to heat stress than other breeds, constituting an advantage for embryo development in adverse weather conditions [26]. At present, studies of gene expression profiles of genes related to heat stress in Colombian Creole cattle under tropical environmental conditions are limited. Thus, it is important to establish the gene transcripts of heat shock proteins such as hsp60, hsp70, hsp90, and hsf1 in whole blood, as an additional tool for selecting better-adapted individuals in tropical conditions.

This study aimed to determine the expression profile of genes related to the heat stress response in whole blood obtained from the Romosinuano creole breed.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

All procedures involving animals were approved by the Ethics committee of the University of Tolima (Approval no. 001-2021), based on Law 84/1989 and Resolution 8430/1993 and complied with the guidelines for animal care and use in research and teaching [27].

Study period and location

The study was conducted from July to August 2020. Fifteen healthy cows (n = 15) of Romosinuano breed (age: 48 ± 96 months) and weight (400 ± 39 kg body weight) were selected by phenotypic characteristics and productive and reproductive behavior of the parents, and located on a farm near Monteria city - Cordoba district in northern region of Colombia, (Latitude 8◦45′36′N and Longitude 75◦53′08′′W), with an average temperature of 29°C and relative humidity between 70% and 85%, in the wet season. Cows were kept under the same sanitary and nutritional management in a grazing system using Megathyrsus maximus, cv. Tanzania and Dichantium aristatum, and supplemented with corn silage, mineralized salt, and water ad libitum.

Sample collection

Sixty blood samples (4 mL) were collected twice in the wet season, sampling daily between 7:00 and 9:00 h and then from 15:00 until 17:00 h. Blood samples were obtained by venipuncture of the Caudalis medium vein (tail vein) using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes (Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); blood samples were divided into aliquots of 2 mL in vial tubes and frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −20°C until experimental analysis.

Weather data

Air temperature and relative humidity data were obtained from the experimental cattle yard using PCE-FWS20N weather station equipment (PCE Instruments™, Meschede, Germany). Temperature monitoring was carried out 15 days before taking the blood samples to determine the coolest and hottest hours of the day in the wet season. The THI was calculated using the formula [28] as follows:

THI = (1.8Tdv + 32) – 0.55 – 0.00551.8Tdb – 26 1.

THI data were used to identify categories of livestock weather safety index [29].

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from whole blood samples using the RNA-solv® reagent kit (OMEGA, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with certain modifications [28]. Before reverse transcription, all RNA samples were diluted to 200 ng/mL, and cDNA was synthesized using the GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. End-point polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed to determine the cDNA quality and the amplicon size.

Real-time PCR analysis

The relative expression of hsp60, hsp70, hsp90, and hsf1 genes was measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in a QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) by fast ramp program, using GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix (Promega). All reactions were performed in duplicate. The relative gene expression was nor­malized using actb as a reference gene [30]. Primer sequences for hsp60, hsp70, hsp90, and hsf1 amplification by qPCR assay are presented in Table-1 [30, 31]. Thermal cycling conditions were initial denaturation for 2 min at 95°C, then 40 cycles of denaturation for 3 s at 95°C, and annealing for 30 s at 60°C. Subsequently, a melting step was performed at 95°C for 1 s, 60°C for 20 s, and a continuous rise in temperature to 95°C at a rate of 0.15°C per second. The data obtained were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

Table-1.

Primer sequences for hsp60, hsp70, hsp90, and hsf1 amplification by qPCR assay.

Gene Primer sequence (5´-3´) Primer length (NT) TM (°C) GC% Amplicon size (bp) Reference
hsp60 F GGAAAAGGTGACAAGGCTCA 20 58.02 50 214 This study
R CAGCTCGTGTGGCATTAAGA 20 58.27 50
hsp70 F AGGACTTCGACAACAGGCTG 22 56.53 39.14 141 This study
R TGCTGGACGACAAGGTTCTC 20 60 55
hsp90 F GGAGGATCACTTGGCTGTCA 20 59.38 55 177 [31]
R GATTAGCTCCTCGCAGTT 20 59.53 55
hsf1 F CCCCGACCACCCTTATTG 18 57.02 61.11 139 This study
R GCGACGCTGAGGCACTT 17 60.42 64.71
actb F GGGATGAGGCTCAGAGCAAGAGA 23 63.65 56.52 118 [30]
R AGCTCGTTGTAGAAGGTGTGGTGCC 25 66.91 56.00

qPCR=Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, NT=Nucleotides, TM=Temperature, GC=Guanine-cytosine

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using cycle threshold data from cow blood samples obtained in the morning and afternoon. The differences in the relative gene expression between the two groups were analyzed by Mann–Whitney test using GraphPad Prism software v 8.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

Results

Temperature-humidity index

The coolest hours and lowest humidity percentages were between 5:00 and 7:00, with a calculated THI: 76, and the hottest and high humidity hours were between 13:00 and 14:00, showing THI: 83. Thus, blood samples were collected approximately 1 h after the lowest and highest THI, between 7:00 to 9:00 (THI: 78) and 15:00 to 17:00 (THI: 81).

Gene expression profile of hsp60, hsp70, hsp90, and hsf1

The difference between the increase in THI at the sampling times evidenced a differential expression in the hsp70 gene (AM vs. PM p = 0.0011) and the hsf1 gene (AM vs. PM p = 0.0003) (Figure-1). In contrast, the expression of hsp60 and hsp90 did not show a statistical difference between the two sampling times (p = 0.12 and p = 0.73, respectively).

Figure-1.

Figure-1

mRNA expression of hsp60, hsp70, hsp90, and hsf1 in Romosinuano breed at two different hours a day. Data are presented as the means ± standard errors. Means with different superscripts differ significantly (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).

Discussion

Livestock productions are under different stressors that generate significant economic losses [32]. Heat stress is one of the most critical stressors that affect livestock production, with an estimated annual economic loss of 1.69–2.36 billion US dollars [33, 34]. Heat stress negatively affects livestock parameters, including feed intake, growth, fertility, and conception rates [35]. However, livestock can respond to heat stress through evolutionarily conserved processes that regulate differential gene expression and related pathways [36]. For example, under heat stress conditions, HSP synthesis protects cells from heat stress by repairing protein damage [37].

This study was conducted to evaluate changes in the expression of HSP genes (hsp60, hsp70, hsp90, and hsf1) in whole blood obtained from Romosinuano creole breed in two different environmental conditions during the day in the wet season, using THI according to the Livestock Weather Safety Index to categorize the heat stress associated with hot-weather conditions for livestock exposed to extreme conditions [38]. One category corresponds to the THI obtained at morning sampling, calculated THI 78 (alert), and THI obtained at afternoon sampling 83 (danger). Our results indicated that compared to the samples taken during the heat stress of the Alert category, the mRNA expression of the hsf1 and hsp70 genes was significantly higher than in the samples taken during the danger category (Figure-1). This way, the overexpression of hsf1 in samples taken during the danger category can be explained because this gene is the main modulator of heat shock response [39]. hsf1 plays an essential role in cells subjected to heat shock or other proteotoxic conditions by protecting against stressors by positively regulating HSP mRNA levels [4042]. For example, HSF1 interaction between HSP70 and its companion HSP40 has been correlated with increased hsp70 gene expression [43, 44].

Furthermore, the level of hsp70 mRNA in samples taken during the category of danger can also be attributed to the conserved role that this gene plays in cellular thermotolerance between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms [45]. In the present study, the mRNA expression profile of hsp70 in blood samples agrees with the previous studies, where the increment of expression of hsp70 mRNA was reported after heat exposure at higher temperatures [46]. Further, an increase in hsp60 expression without a significant difference was observed in the samples taken during the danger category. The induction of hsp60 has been reported to help prevent apoptotic cell death by rapidly activating pro-caspase-3 during apoptosis [4749]. The previous studies also reported that hsp70 and hsp60 are upregulated in cattle during heat stress [50].

On the other hand, the decrease in hsp90 mRNA expression without a significant difference can be attributed to the rapid induction of translation of the HSP90 protein to protect cells from heat stress [51]. Finally, it is important to mention that this is the first research on HSP gene expression in the Romosinuano cattle breed. Romosinuano cattle is an adapted Bos taurus breed that has a thermoregulatory capacity explained through physiological processes such as the reduction of heat production and the ability to increase heat loss to the environment [5254].

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the THI threshold influences changes in the gene expression of some genes related to heat stress in the Romosinuano cattle in the dry tropical forest, especially in the danger THI category (afternoon) under conditions in our study and induced the expression of hsf1 and hsp70 genes in whole blood samples compared to the THI range in the alert category (morning), due to these proteins being in charge of cell protection during heat stress, providing information about the possible cellular adaptation in this creole cattle.

Authors’ Contributions

JCT, RR, KJL, and ISR: Conceptualization and formal analysis. JCT, RJO, KJL, JSN, and HFU: Methodology. HFU, JCT,JSN and ISR: Software. ISR and MPH: Validation. RR, MPH, KJL, RJO and ISR: Writing – original draft preparation and writing – review and editing. KJL, MPH and ISR: Supervision. RR, JSN, RJO and ISR: Project administration. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the members of Union Temporal Embriotecno y Embriovet for their support with the sample collection. This study was funded by Sistema General de Regalías de Colombia project code: BPIN 2016000100026 and approved for the University of Tolima Research and Technologic development office at the project 50618.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.

References

  • 1.Summer A, Lora I, Formaggioni P, Gottardo F. Impact of heat stress on milk and meat production. Anim. Front. 2019;9(1):39–46. doi: 10.1093/af/vfy026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Henry R.C, Engström K, Olin S, Alexander P, Arneth A, Rounsevell M.D.A. Food supply and bioenergy production within the global cropland planetary boundary. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chao Q, Feng A. Scientific basis of climate change and its response. Glob. Energy. Interconnect. 2018;1(4):420–427. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ali M.Z, Carlile G, Giasuddin M. Impact of global climate change on livestock health:Bangladesh perspective. Open. Vet. J. 2020;10(2):178–188. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v10i2.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pires B.V, Stafuzza N.B, Lima S.B.G, Negrão J.A, Paz C.C.P. Differential expression of heat shock protein genes associated with heat stress in Nelore and Caracu beef cattle. Livest. Sci. 2019;230:103839. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thornton P, Nelson G, Mayberry D, Herrero M. Increases in extreme heat stress in domesticated livestock species during the twentyfirst century. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021;27(22):5762–5772. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.West J.W. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2003;86(6):2131–2144. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Polsky L, von Keyserlingk M.A. Invited review:Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J. Dairy. Sci. 2017;100(11):8645–8657. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Foster J, Hodder S.G, Lloyd A.B, Havenith G. Individual responses to heat stress:Implications for hyperthermia and physical work capacity. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:541483. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.541483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paula-Lopes F.F, Lima R.S.D, Satrapa R.A, Barros C.M. Physiology and endocrinology symposium:Influence of cattle genotype (Bos indicus vs. Bos taurus) on oocyte and preimplantation embryo resistance to increased temperature. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;91(3):1143–1153. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Naranjo-Gómez J.S, Uribe-García H.F, Herrera-Sánchez M.P, Lozano-Villegas K.J, Rodríguez-Hernández R, Rondón-Barragán I.S. Heat stress on cattle embryo:Gene regulation and adaptation. Heliyon. 2021;7(3):e06570. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ouellet V, Toledo I.M, Dado-Senn B, Dahl G.E, Laporta J. Critical temperature-humidity index thresholds for dry cows in a subtropical climate. Front. Anim. Sci. 2021;2:28. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Keusch G.T. What do-omics mean for the science and policy of the nutritional sciences? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006;83(2):520S–522S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.520S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ribeiro D.M, Salama A.A.K, Vitor A.C.M, Argüello A, Moncau C.T, Santos E.M, Caja G, de Oliveira J.S, Balieiro J.C.C, Hernández-Castellano L.E, Zachut M, Poleti M.D, Castro N, Alves S.P, Almeida A.M. The application of omics in ruminant production:A review in the tropical and subtropical animal production context. J. Proteomics. 2020;227:103905. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bharati J, Dangi S.S, Bag S, Maurya V.P, Singh G, Kumar P, Sarkar M. Expression dynamics of HSP90 and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms during heat stress acclimation in Tharparkar cattle. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017;61(8):1461–1469. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1323-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Souza-Cácares M.B, Fialho A.L.L, Silva W.A.L, Cardoso C.J.T, Pöhland R, Martins M.I.M, Melo-Sterza F.A. Oocyte quality and heat shock proteins in oocytes from bovine breeds adapted to the tropics under different conditions of environmental thermal stress. Theriogenology. 2019;130:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Archana P.R, Aleena J, Pragna P, Vidya M.K, Niyas A.P.A, Bagath M, Krishnan G, Manimaran A, Beena V, Kurien E.K, Sejian V, Bhatta R. Role of heat shock proteins in livestock adaptation to heat stress. J. Dairy. Vet. Anim. Res. 2017;5(1):00127. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu S, Yue T, Ahmad M.J, Hu X, Zhang X, Deng T, Hu Y, He C, Zhou Y, Yang L. Transcriptome analysis reveals potential regulatory genes related to heat tolerance in Holstein dairy cattle. Genes. 2020;11(1):68. doi: 10.3390/genes11010068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cooke R.F, Cardoso R.C, Cerri R.L, Lamb G.C, Pohler K.G, Riley D.G, Vasconcelos J.L. Cattle adapted to tropical and subtropical environments:Genetic and reproductive considerations. J. Anim. Sci. 2020;98(2):skaa015. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deb R, Sajjanar B, Singh U, Kumar S, Singh R, Sengar G, Sharma A. Effect of heat stress on the expression profile of Hsp90 among Sahiwal (Bos indicus) and Frieswal (Bos indicus×Bos taurus) breed of cattle:A comparative study. Genes. 2014;536(2):435–440. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.11.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith G.G. Polymorphisms of Bovine HSP90 and Their Implications in Beef Cattle Productivity. Animal Science Undergraduate Honors Theses. 2018 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mullins C.R, Zerby H.N, Fitzpatrick L.A, Parker A.J. Bos indicus cattle possess greater basal concentrations of HSP27, alpha B-crystallin, and HSP70 in skeletal muscle in vivo compared with Bos taurus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94(1):424–429. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lees A.M, Sejian V, Wallage A.L, Steel C.C, Mader T.L, Lees J.C, Gaughan J.B. The impact of heat load on cattle. Animals. 2019;9(6):322. doi: 10.3390/ani9060322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vásquez R, Martínez R, Ballesteros H, Grajales H, Pérez G.J.E, Abuabara Y, Barrera C.G.P. El Ganado Romosinuano en la Producción de Carne en Colombia. Corporacion Colombiana de Investigacion Agropecuaria, Bogotá. 2006 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Scharf B, Carroll J.A, Riley D.G, Chase C.C, Jr, Coleman S.W, Keisler D.H, Weaber R.L, Spiers D.E. Evaluation of physiological and blood serum differences in heat-tolerant (Romosinuano) and heat-susceptible (Angus) Bos taurus cattle during controlled heat challenge. J. Anim. Sci. 2010;88(7):2321–2336. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hernández-Cerón J, Chase C.C, Jr, Hansen P.J. Differences in heat tolerance between preimplantation embryos from Brahman, Romosinuano, and Angus breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 2004;87(1):53–58. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73141-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (US), Committee on Care, and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (No. 86). US Department of Health and Human Service. United States: Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.National Research Council. A guide to environmental research on animals. National academic science. Washington, DC: NRC; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hahn G. L, Gaughan J. B, Mader T. L, Eigenberg R. A. Thermal indices and their applications for livestock environments. In livestock energetics and thermal environment management. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 2009:113–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lozano-Villegas K.J, Rodríguez-Hernández R, Herrera-Sánchez M.P, Uribe-García H.F, Naranjo-Gómez J.S, Otero-Arroyo R.J, Rondón-Barragán I.S. Identification of reference genes for expression studies in the whole blood from three cattle breeds under two states of livestock weather safety. Animals. 2021;11(11):3073. doi: 10.3390/ani11113073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Singh R.L, Mondal S. Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture:Emerging Approaches and Strategies. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rojas-Downing M.M, Nejadhashemi A.P, Harrigan T, Woznicki S.A. Climate change and livestock:Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Clim. Risk Manag. 2017;16:145–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Slimen I.B, Najar T, Ghram A, Abdrrabba M. Heat stress effects on livestock:Molecular, cellular and metabolic aspects, a review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2016;100(3):401–412. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.St-Pierre N.R, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J. Dairy Sci. 2003;86:E52–E77. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kishore A, Sodhi M, Kumari P, Mohanty A.K, Sadana D.K, Kapila N, Khate K, Shandilya U, Kataria R.S, Mukesh M. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells:A potential cellular system to understand differential heat shock response across native cattle (Bos indicus), exotic cattle (Bos taurus), and riverine buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) of India. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2014;19(5):613–621. doi: 10.1007/s12192-013-0486-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Garner J.B, Chamberlain A.J, Vander Jagt C, Nguyen T.T.T, Mason B.A, Marett L.C, Leury B.J, Wales W.J, Hayes B.J. Gene expression of the heat stress response in bovine peripheral white blood cells and milk somatic cells in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):19181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75438-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vabulas R.M, Raychaudhuri S, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl F.U. Protein folding in the cytoplasm and the heat shock response. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010;2(12):a004390. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mesika R, Reichmann D. When safeguarding goes wrong:Impact of oxidative stress on protein homeostasis in health and neurodegenerative disorders. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2019;114:221–264. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Anckar J, Sistonen L. Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response:Implications in aging and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011;80:1089–1115. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060809-095203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mohapatra S, Kundu A.K, Mishra S.R, Senapati S, Jyotiranjan T, Panda G. HSF1 and GM-CSF expression, its association with cardiac health, and assessment of organ function during heat stress in crossbred Jersey cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021;139:200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Morimoto R.I, Hunt C, Huang S.Y, Berg K.L, Banerji S.S. Organization, nucleotide sequence, and transcription of the chicken HSP70 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261(27):12692–12699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Baler R, Welch W.J, Voellmy R. Heat shock gene regulation by nascent polypeptides and denatured proteins:Hsp70 as a potential auto-regulatory factor. J. Cell Biol. 1992;117(6):1151–1159. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.6.1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shi Y, Mosser D.D, Morimoto R.I. Molecular chaperones as HSF1-specific transcriptional repressors. Genes Dev. 1998;12(5):654–666. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.5.654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lindquist S, Craig E.A. The heat-shock proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1988;22(1):631–677. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bharati J, Dangi S.S, Chouhan V.S, Mishra S.R, Bharti M.K, Verma V, Shankar O, Yadav V.P, Das K, Paul A. Expression dynamics of HSP70 during chronic heat stress in Tharparkar cattle. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017;61(6):1017–1027. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1281-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Samali A, Cai J, Zhivotovsky B, Jones D.P, Orrenius S. Presence of a pre-apoptotic complex of pro-caspase-3, Hsp60 and Hsp10 in the mitochondrial fraction of Jurkat cells. EMBO J. 1999;18(8):2040–2048. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.8.2040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wehner P.S, Nielsen B, Hokland M. Expression levels of hsc70 and hsp60 are developmentally regulated during Bcell maturation and not associated to childhood cALL at presentation or relapse. Eur. J. Haematol. 2003;71(2):100–108. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xanthoudakis S, Roy S, Rasper D, Hennessey T, Aubin Y, Cassady R, Tawa P, Ruel R, Rosen A, Nicholson D.W. Hsp60 accelerates the maturation of pro-caspase-3 by upstream activator proteases during apoptosis. EMBO J. 1999;18(8):2049–2056. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.8.2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Khan A, Dou J, Wang Y, Jiang X, Khan M.Z, Luo H, Usman T, Zhu H. Evaluation of heat stress effects on cellular and transcriptional adaptation of bovine granulosa cells. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020;11(1):1–20. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0408-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Collier R.J, Collier J.L, Rhoads R.P, Baumgard L.H. Genes involved in the bovine heat stress response:An invited review. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91(2):445–454. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Carroll J.A, Burdick N.C, Chase C.C, Jr, Coleman S.W, Spiers D.E. Influence of environmental temperature on the physiological, endocrine, and immune responses in livestock exposed to a provocative immune challenge. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2012;43(2):146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2011.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Carroll J.A, Burdick N.C, Reuter R.R, Chase C.C, Jr, Spiers D.E, Arthington J.D, Coleman S.W. Differential acute phase immune responses by Angus and Romosinuano steers following an endotoxin challenge. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2011;41(4):163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Baumgard L.H, Rhoads R.P, Rhoads M.L, Gabler N.K, Ross J.W, Keating A.F, Boddicker R.L, Lenka S, Sejian V. In:Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. Impact of climate change on livestock production; pp. 413–468. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim W.S, Nejad J, Roh S.G, Lee H.G. Heat-shock proteins gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as an indicator of heat stress in beef calves. Animals. 2020;10(5):895. doi: 10.3390/ani10050895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES