Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1978 May;35(2):109–116. doi: 10.1136/oem.35.2.109

Lung cancer in workers in a nickel refinery

L Kreyberg 1
PMCID: PMC1008363  PMID: 656334

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study is an analysis of the occurrence of lung cancer in nickel workers, particularly with regard to development time, histological types and tobacco smoking, in addition to specific exposure to nickel dust and fumes. It is a continuation of previous work in this field (Kreyberg, 1954a, b; 1962, 1969). The series consists of 44 cases of lung cancer occurring during the years 1948-74 in people currently or previously employed at Falconbridge nickel refinery. A seven-year period of reduced activity during the war enables lung cancer in workers who took up employment in 1927-39 to be compared with that in workers who started in or after 1946. It is confirmed that exposure to nickel dust and fumes increases the risk of developing lung cancer. However, all subjects with small cell anaplastic carcinoma and at least 25 out of 28 subjects with epidermoid carcinoma had been tobacco smokers. Four smokers and four non-smokers had Group II tumours. The mean age at diagnosis of lung cancer in the nickel workers corresponds closely with that of male subjects with lung cancer in general, in spite of the very wide differences in the development time, if this is related to the employment time in the refinery alone. The mean age at diagnosis is, however, consistent if the development time is related to the length of tobacco smoking. Tobacco smoking is an important factor in the development of lung cancer in nickel workers, and under the conditions described in this study the reduced carcinogenic influence may be attributable to reduced exposure to nickel and possibly also to tobacco.

Full text

PDF
109

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown W. M., Doll R. Mortality from cancer and other causes after radiotherapy for ankylosing spondylitis. Br Med J. 1965 Dec 4;2(5474):1327–1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5474.1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DOLL R. Cancer of the lung and nose in nickel workers. Br J Ind Med. 1958 Oct;15(4):217–223. doi: 10.1136/oem.15.4.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DOLL R., HILL A. B. MORTALITY IN RELATION TO SMOKING: TEN YEARS' OBSERVATIONS OF BRITISH DOCTORS. Br Med J. 1964 May 30;1(5395):1399–1410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5395.1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KREYBERG L. Occupational influences in a Norwegian material of 235 cases of primary epithelial lung tumours. Br J Cancer. 1954 Dec;8(4):605–612. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1954.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KREYBERG L. The significance of histological typing in the study of the epidemiology of primary epithelial lung tumours; a study of 466 cases. Br J Cancer. 1954 Jun;8(2):199–208. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1954.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kreyberg H. J. Empirical relationship of lung cancer incidence to cigarette smoking and a stochastic model for the mode action of carcinogens. Biometrics. 1965 Dec;21(4):839–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pedersen E., Hogetveit A. C., Andersen A. Cancer of respiratory organs among workers at a nickel refinery in Norway. Int J Cancer. 1973 Jul 15;12(1):32–41. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910120104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sunderman F. W., Jr The current status of nickel carcinogenesis. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1973 May-Jun;3(3):156–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES