Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Apr 10;18(4):e0284134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284134

Urban modeling of shrinking cities through Bayesian network analysis using economic, social, and educational indicators: Case of Japanese cities

Haruka Kato 1,*
Editor: Jun Yang2
PMCID: PMC10085021  PMID: 37036884

Abstract

Shrinking cities due to low birthrates and aging populations represent a significant urban planning issue. The research question of this study is: which economic, social, and educational factors affect population decline in Japanese shrinking cities? By modeling shrinking cities using the case of Japanese cities, this study aims to clarify the indicators that affect the population change rate. The study employed Bayesian network analysis, a machine learning technique, using a dataset of economic, social, and educational indicators. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that social and educational indicators affect the population decline rate. Surprisingly, the impact of educational indicators is more substantial than that of economic indicators such as the financial strength index. Considering the limitations in fiscal expenditures, increasing investment in education might help solve the problem of shrinking cities because of low birthrates and aging populations. The results provide essential insights and can function as a planning support system.

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

Shrinking cities pose significant urban planning issues [1]. These issues have been seen, for example, in former East Germany due to political changes [2] and in United States’ Rust Belt due to the economic decline [3]. In addition, during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was reported that city populations declined due to urban exodus [4]. Among the various types of population decline, this study focused on Japanese shrinking cities due to the low birthrates and aging populations [5]. The population decline is inevitable in Japan, where immigration is low. In 2021, the Japanese population aged over 65 comprised 36.21 million people, constituting 28.9% of the total population [6]. It was also reported that the national population will decrease to between 38 and 65 million people by 2100 [6]. Fig 1 shows the population change rate (PCR) in Japanese cities in 2010. In Fig 1, PCR is the percentage of change from population in 2005 (P2005) to population in 2010 (P2010), as calculated in Eq (1). Fig 1 indicates that most cities’ populations have been declining. Similar problems are likely to be faced in other East Asian countries such as China [7, 8]. In China, it was identified that 153 cities were shrinking between 1992 and 2019 [9]. Population decline driven by low birthrates and aging populations poses various problems, including overall economic and social decline [10]. For example, population decline correlates with various types of social problems, such as economic decline and increasing vacant houses [11]. However, there is a cascading and complex relationship between economic and social factors within the context of population decline, and researchers have yet to systematically elucidate the factors affecting population decline.

Fig 1. Population change rate in Japanese cities in 2010.

Fig 1

In Fig 1, left side map indicates the location of Tokyo and Osaka in major East Asian cities, and right side indicates map focused on the Osaka Metropolitan area. Fig 1 shows the population change in graduated colors from red to blue. The gray color areas are other cities, such as merged cities. Republished from Fig 1 under a CC BY license, with permission from ESRI Japan, original copyright 2023.

PCR=P2010P2005P2005×100 (1)

The research question of this study is: which economic, social, and educational factors affect population decline in Japanese shrinking cities? These economic, social, and educational factors might be strongly or weakly interrelated with the PCR; such relationships are complex, ranging from the micro to the macro level [12]. That means that the relationship would not reveal deductively using a fixed framework, but inductively using a large set of indicators. The relationships between these factors also do not occur through a simple linear mechanism, but through a non-linear and complex mechanism [13]. To understand these relationships, the logical framework to be utilized is an inductive statistical urban model using various indicators of shrinking cities [14]. The statistical urban models allow policymakers to monitor population decline [15]. For the analysis, this study developed an urban network model that interrelates economic, social, and educational indicators. By providing systematic insights into the issues emerging due to population decline, the model can deliver a planning support system for municipal leaders and urban planners.

1.2 Purpose

This study aims to clarify the indicators that affect the PCR by modeling shrinking cities. For the analysis, this study uses the case of Japanese cities. In Japan, there were 1,733 cities in 2010. Among these, this study analyzes 1,316 cities whose populations were declining as of 2010 (Fig 1). Japan is suitable for this study because it contains the largest number of shrinking cities due to low birthrates and aging populations worldwide. In Japan, the government has begun to develop urban plannings for shrinking cities [16]. Therefore, this study’s results from Japan may contribute by providing insights and a planning support system for shrinking cities worldwide facing similar problems.

Methodologically, this study employed Bayesian network analysis, a machine learning technique, to model shrinking cities using a dataset of economic, social, and educational indicators by cities. The Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) developed the dataset used in this study to promote research that contributes to policy formulation. The dataset comprises cross-sectional data of 259 indicators, including economic, social, and educational indicators [17]. The dataset covers most city-level government statistics that are available publicly. The Bayesian network constructed from this dataset is a stochastic model representing the quantitative causal relationship between individual indicators with conditional probability [18]. The probabilistic estimation of the network makes it possible to predict uncertain scenarios.

1.3 Literature review

The novelty of this study is to develop an urban statistical model of shrinking cities by Bayesian network analysis. Urban models of shrinking cities have been proposed in previous studies. In an early study, the researchers conceptualized an urban model consisting of economic and population decline and policy changes [19]. As research on shrinking cities progressed, particularly in Europe, researchers also conceptualized an urban model in which diverse forms of decline at the global and regional levels caused population declines [20]. These conceptual urban models indicated that population decline is related to economic and social decline. However, it was also found that the indicators associated with population decline are multifaceted and pertain to diverse perspectives [21]. Therefore, to investigate the complicated relationships among these indicators, researchers need to develop both an urban statistical model that strength conceptual models of shrinking cities. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop an urban statistical model of shrinking cities.

Previous studies have analyzed the statistical relationship between population decline and economic indicators in shrinking cities. Specifically, the positive correlation between population change and industrial diversity was clarified [22]. For example, it was investigated the case of Yubari City, a single-industry mining city in Japan, well-known for suffering from rapid population decline and financial collapse because of the mining industry decline [23]. From a different perspective, researchers demonstrated the positive correlation between investment network centralities and population change in shrinking cities [24]. In addition, it was explained that development zone policies have helped curb population decline in these shrinking cities [25]. Academicians also demonstrated that shrinking cities are influenced by socioeconomic development and social indicators, including expenditure on education [26]. In Japan, it was found that population decline in densely inhabited districts is caused by the outflow of residents and the formulation of suburban residential areas [27]. In addition, in the case of Yokohama city, Japan, it was clarified that urban shrinkage was correlated with the aging population, distance to the nearest parks, and proportion of private houses and flats [28]. Despite the important contributions of these past studies, they failed to elucidate the complex and cascading relationships of factors related to population decline. Accordingly, the originality of this study lies in its extension of these prior pieces of evidence by developing an urban statistical model of shrinking cities using a dataset comprising economic, social, and educational indicators, and in its aim to identify the factors influencing PCR. For the analytical methodology, this study refers to the study by Kato [29], wherein urban modeling developed by Bayesian network analysis was used to estimate future populations.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Economic, social, and educational indicators

As mentioned above, this study’s data come from a cross-sectional dataset of economic, social, and educational indicators by cities which MEXT collected to promote research contributing to the formulation of educational policies [17]. This study used this dataset because it covers most publicly available city-level government statistics in Japan. Specifically, it stems from sources such as the Japanese Census, the School Basic Survey, the National Survey of Academic Progress, the Social Education Survey, the Survey on Time Uses and Leisure Activities, the Housing and Land Survey of Japan, the Major Financial Indicators of Local Governments, the Economic Census, and the National Survey of Family Income and Expenditure [30]. While this dataset cannot be shared publicly because of governments’ confidentiality, the dataset is available from the Japanese MEXT Institutional data access for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Since April 5, 2022, the author has received permission from MEXT to provide this data. All indicators are listed in S1 Table.

The indicators present in the dataset are used not only for policymaking but also for academic research [31, 32], and the dataset encompasses 259 indicators in total [33]. This study used all 259 indicators containing numerical and nominal scale data. The dataset covers the ten years from April 1, 2001, to April 1, 2011. This study used data as of April 2011. Although the dataset is 10 years old, no other datasets in Japan have such a comprehensive range of indicators. As population decline is a long-term urban phenomenon, the dataset is valuable and appropriate for this study.

2.2 Bayesian network analysis

Bayesian network analysis was used for urban modeling based on the economic, social, and educational indicators. Compared to similar statistical analysis methods, such as structural equation model analysis, neural network analysis, and decision tree analysis, Bayesian network analysis allows for the flexible analysis of nonlinear and non-normal relationships between indicators [29]. It also enables researchers to obtain robust models that avoid collinearity risk [34]. It is important for the current study that that the analytical process of choice can avoid collinearity risk because 259 indicators are under scrutiny. This study used BayesiaLab 10.2 as its Bayesian network construction algorithm [34].

This study adopted the maximum weight spanning tree (MWST) and taboo algorithms for the optimal local search for each child node; the MWST algorithm was deployed first, followed by the taboo algorithm. The MWST algorithm makes it possible to compute big data, which this study analyzed, faster than other algorithms [35]. The taboo algorithm is effective for refining networks built by updating another network learned on a different dataset, because it refers to structural learning by implementing the taboo search for Bayesian networks [36].

For the analysis, this study set the indicator of PCR as the target variable; Bayesian network analysis revealed the total effect (TE) and correlation of indicators on the PCR. TE was analyzed by standard target mean analysis (STMA), which uses the mean value evidence to go through the indicators’ variation domain and measure the impact of indicators on the target’s mean. That is, TE is the derivative of the total effects curve computed at the a priori mean of that variable, δx = 0 and δy = 0 [34]. The standardized total effect (STE) normalized the TE by taking into account the ratio between the standard deviations of the indicators (σx) and the target indicator (PCR) (σy) [34]. The STE was calculated using Eq (2), as follows:

STE=δyδx×σyσx (2)

Correlation analysis was based on mutual information (MI), defined as the difference between the marginal entropy H(Y) of the target indicator (PCR) and its conditional entropy H(Y|X). The MI was calculated using Eq (3), which is equivalent to Eq (4); in the latter, p(x,y) is the joint probability function of X and Y, while p(x) and p(y) are the marginal probability functions of X and Y.

MI(Y,X)=H(Y)H(Y|X) (3)
MI(T,X)=xXyYp(x,y)log2p(x,y)p(x)p(y) (4)

The binary mutual information (BMI) is the amount of information brought by each indicator to the knowledge of the state of the target indicator (PCR) compared to an unconnected network [34]. That means that BMI is amount of information brought by each variable to the knowledge of the state of the target indicator (PCR).

3. Results

Fig 2 shows the urban model of shrinking cities developed by Bayesian network analysis. In the network, Pearson’s correlation coefficients between indicators are shown in the links. In total, 208 out of 259 indicators formed a significant network. These 208 indicators, including economic, educational, and social indicators, represent an interrelated urban model.

Fig 2. Bayesian network of shrinking cities.

Fig 2

The upper graph shows the whole network. The lower graph shows the network around the PCR. In the lower graph, numbers between links indicate the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

The lower part of Fig 2 shows a Bayesian network focusing on PCR as the target indicator. Among social indicators, "population change rate aged 0–14" and " population aged over 65" are strongly related to the PCR. "Population aged over 65" has a negative correlation coefficient, indicating that an increase in the number of older adults results in a decrease in the PCR. Meanwhile, relevant educational indicators include "number of children per teacher in elementary schools," "number of children per teacher in junior high schools," and "number of students per educational computer in junior high schools. "Financial strength index," which serves to represent the financial strength of a local government and is the average of the values obtained by dividing the standard financial revenue amount by the standard financial demand amount over the past three years, is one of the relevant economic indicators. Finally, urban planning indicators were not found to be related to PCR.

Table 1 shows the STE, MI, BMI, and p-value of each indicator in relation to the PCR. Table 1 focuses on 14 indicators with STE more than |0.2|. Hence, indicators with STE less than |0.2| have little effect on the PCR. The STE, MI, and p-value of all indicators are listed in S1 Table.

Table 1. STE, MI, BMI, and p-value of each indicator.

BMI
Indicators STE MI ≤0 ≤-4.0 ≤-7.7 ≤-12.6 p-value
Population change rate aged 0–14 0.73 0.54 0.09 0.19 0.16 0.35 **
Population aged over 65 -0.70 0.50 0.08 0.16 0.14 0.35 **
Natural population change rate 0.57 0.30 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.22 **
Percentage of population aged 0–14 0.51 0.22 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.15 **
Number of children per teacher in elementary school 0.47 0.20 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.15 **
Average age of unmarried men -0.43 0.16 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.11 **
Number of children per teacher in junior high school 0.36 0.10 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.08 **
Population change rate aged over 65 0.30 0.08 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.06 **
Financial strength index 0.29 0.09 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.07 **
Percentage of combined classes in elementary school -0.27 0.06 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.05 **
Average age of unmarried women -0.26 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.04 **
Number of students per educational computer in junior high schools 0.25 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.05 **
Number of students per educational computer in schools 0.21 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.03 **
Percentage of workers in primary industry -0.20 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.03 **

Table 1 focuses on 14 indicators with STE more than |0.2|. In Table 1, STE is standardized total effects. MI is mutual information. BMI is binary mutual information.

* indicates p-value < 0.05.

** indicates p-value < 0.01.

Table 1 shows that the most significant indicators of the PCR are the social indicators of "population change rate aged 0–14” (STE = 0.73), " population aged over 65” (STE = -0.70), "average age of unmarried men” (STE = -0.43), and "natural population change rate” (STE = 0.57). In shrinking cities with a PCR under -12.6, BMI is higher for "population change rate aged 0–14” (BMI = 0.35) and " population aged over 65” (BMI = 0.35), suggesting that these two indicators strongly correlate with increased population change. It is worth noting the low STE of the "population aged 15–65” (STE = 0.09), which was not included in Table 1. The strong relationship between the "population aged 15–65” and the PCR might suggest that the population has decreased due to migration, as in other shrinking cities in the US and European countries. However, the model indicates the weak relationship between the "population aged 15–65” and the PCR in Japanese shrinking cities. Thus, population decline in Japanese shrinking cities occurred primarily due to natural population change rather than population change because of migration.

The PCR is also found to be affected by educational indicators, with relevant factors including "number of children per teacher in elementary school” (STE = 0.47), "percentage of combined classes in elementary school” (STE = -0.27), and "number of students per educational computer in schools” (STE = 0.21). Therefore, population change is related to aspects of education, such as the number of teachers and educational computers.

Two economic indicators are shown to affect the PCR, namely "financial strength index” (STE = 0.29) and "percentage of workers in primary industry” (STE = -0.20), albeit other economic indicators such as "per capita income of prefectural citizens, and "taxable income" did not affect PCR. Hence, the analysis suggests that the PCR is more strongly influenced by social and educational indicators than economic indicators in Japan.

Many other indicators show a weak relationship with the PCR but are not listed in Table 1, including indicators related to urban facilities (e.g., "number of community centers" and "number of medical clinics,") and housing, (e.g., "number of homes located more than 500 meters from the nearest elementary school" and "number of land transactions").

Fig 3 shows the probabilistic change of shrinking cities with rapid population decline. In this study, shrinking cities with rapid population decline are those with a PCR under -12.6%, which accounted for 4.6% of shrinking cities in Japan. Among these cities, the probabilities of the social indicators of "population change rate aged 0–14 ≤ -26.3" and "natural population change rate ≤ -1.3" change from 4.1% to 52.7% and from 7.0% to 38.9%, respectively. Regarding educational indicators, the probability of "number of children per teacher in elementary school ≤ -7.8" and "number of students per educational computer in schools ≤ -4.0" changed from 17.8% to 55.1% and from 38.4% to 59.9%, respectively. Regarding economic indicators, the "financial strength index ≤ 0.34" probability changed from 40.7% to 72.3%. These results suggest that shrinking cities with rapidly declining populations experience a significant deterioration in social, educational, and economic indicators.

Fig 3. Probabilistic change of shrinking cities with rapid population decline.

Fig 3

Fig 3 focuses on 14 indicators with STE more than |0.2|.

4. Discussions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that social and educational indicators affect the population decline rate by modeling shrinking cities in Japan through Bayesian network analysis. The statistical urban model of this study indicates the cascading and complex relationships between the factors affecting population decline in shrinking cities. While the results regarding social indicators are in line with those of previous research [2628], the current findings are still novel and unexpected; particularly, the study shows that educational indicators have a more substantial impact than economic indicators such as the financial strength index. Previous studies have pointed to the impact of economic decline on shrinking cities [22, 24]; this occurs when people migrate out of cities as local industry declines and jobs are lost. Meanwhile, the results of this study demonstrate that population decline in Japanese shrinking cities is not because of such outflow decline related to migration but because of a natural decline related to low birthrates and aging populations.

This reality of shrinking cities in Japan might explain why children’s education have a stronger impact on the PCR in this context. Parents might feel more comfortable having and raising children if city governments value educational support. The educational support includes not only teachers but also educational computers. This result is consistent with those of prior research showing that those who continue to live in shrinking cities have been found to value the attractions of the city, including social connections, and economic activities in the city [37].

Still, this relevance of educational indicators might be unique to Japan, which has experienced a declining population due to its low birthrates. In Japan, education accounts for a low percentage of national and administrative fiscal expenditures, primarily because social security expenditures for older adults are a heavy burden [38]. However, when considering the current results and the fiscal expenditure limitations in Japan, the suggestion is that increasing investment in education for children might help solve the problem of shrinking cities.

The results also suggest that urban planning indicators—including "number of community centers," "number of medical clinics," "number of homes located more than 500 meters from the nearest elementary school," and "number of land transactions"—do not directly affect population decline rates in Japanese shrinking cities. Further, based on the low STE scores for these indicators, they only indirectly affect the population decline rate. This result is surprising when seen against studies that analyzed shrinking cities in the context of urban planning [28, 29]. However, these findings do not imply that urban planning has no impact on the population decline rate. Urban planners are still suggested to continue to implement urban planning strategies for shrinking cities. At the same time, considering that governments have limited financial resources, the results also suggest that it might not be necessary for governments to prioritize urban planning as a target for tackling population decline in shrinking cities. Instead, it might be better to effectively maintain and manage, not build and construct, the range of urban planning-related factors that were developed during the city’s population growth period. Overall, urban planning in shrinking cities remains an important topic that needs to be considered more in the future.

It should be noted that this study was conducted in Japan, a country characterized by a comfort climate. However, in some countries worldwide, including those in the Global South, global warming issues might cause population decline. Particularly, researchers show that there are correlations between the urban population, the built environment, and land surface temperatures [3942], and that land surface temperatures are influenced more by the built than natural environment [43]. Another study shows that the relationship between these factors and urban temperature is nonlinear [44]. These pieces of evidence suggest that populations might begin to decline as temperatures exceed a threshold. Specifically, the natural disasters caused by global warming, such as hurricanes and floods, have been reported to be related to emerging refugee issues [45]. Thus, future researchers attempting to use methods and conduct analyses similar to those of the current study in the context of other countries may need to also consider the impact of global warming. Scholars have also remarked that research networks enabling the interaction between research and practice play an essential role in global research regarding shrinking cities [46].

A limitation of this study is the use of data only as of 2011. Specifically, the dataset of economic, social, and educational indicators used in this study covers most city-level government statistics; there is no other Japanese dataset that covers as many city-level indicators. However, due to the need to match the year, the data is only as of 2011. Because population decline is a long-term urban phenomenon, this dataset still allowed for the provision of novel conclusions. Considering this limitation, researchers could endeavor to combine the most recent and past datasets comprising economic, social, and educational indicators of cities into time series data, and then analyze the urban model developed in this study using this time series dataset. Such analysis may help us investigate future scenarios based on the urban model developed in this study.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the study findings provide essential insights into the importance of education investment for children in shrinking cities. Regarding theoretical implications, this study shows that the impact of educational investment is more substantial than that of economic indicators (e.g., the financial strength index). With this in mind and considering the limitations regarding fiscal expenditures in Japan, it may be important for municipal leaders to invest in education for children in order to prevent rapid population decline. In summary, increasing the budget for education to tackle the decline in the number of children and increasing the welfare expenditure to tackle the growth in the number of older adults are likely important measures in the context of population decline because of low birth rates and aging populations.

In Japan, population decline is expected to continue for a long time, as immigration is low. In this context, Japanese shrinking cities need to achieve a gradual, rather than a rapid, population decline to maintain residents’ abundant lifestyle. The conclusions of this study could contribute to countries other than Japan that are likely to experience future population decline because of low birth rates and aging populations.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Results of the economic, social, and educational indicators.

The table below shows the 259 indicators with their average, standard deviation score, standardized total effect, mutual information, and p-value.

(PDF)

Data Availability

Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators cannot be shared publicly because of governments’ confidentiality. Data are available from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Institutional Data Access (contact via MEXT, +81-5253-4111, https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/001/1322611.htm) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

H.K., 21K14318, JSPS KAKENHI, https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHIPROJECT- 21K14318/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mallach A, Haase A, Hattori K. The shrinking city in comparative perspective: Contrasting dynamics and responses to urban shrinkage. Cities. 2017;69: 102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nelle A, Großmann K, Haase D, Kabisch S, Rink D, Wolff M. Urban shrinkage in Germany: An entangled web of conditions, debates and policies. Cities. 2017;69: 116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hackworth J. Rightsizing as spatial austerity in the American Rust Belt. Environ Plan A: Econ Space. 2015;47: 766–782. doi: 10.1068/a140327p [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kato H, Takizawa A. Impact of the Urban Exodus Triggered by the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Shrinking Cities of the Osaka Metropolitan Area. Sustainability. 2022;14: 1601. doi: 10.3390/su14031601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buhnik S. From shrinking cities to Toshi no Shukushō: Identifying patterns of urban shrinkage in the Osaka Metropolitan Area. Berkeley Plan J. 2011;23. doi: 10.5070/BP323111434 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Statistical Handbook of Japan 2022. In: Statistics Bureau of Japan [Internet]. 2022 [cited 25 May 2022]. Available: https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/pdf/2022all.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 7.You H, Yang J, Xue B, Xiao X, Xia J, Jin C, et al. Spatial evolution of population change in Northeast China during 1992–2018. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;776: 146023. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ye Y. When will China’s population peak? It depends who you ask. Nature. 2022. Aug 25 [cited 4 February 2023]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02304-8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-02304-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang Y, Wu J, Wang Y, Huang Q, He C. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of shrinking cities in urbanizing China: A novel approach based on time-series nighttime light data. Cities. 2021;118: 103346. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103346 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Manville M, Kuhlmann D. The social and fiscal consequences of urban decline: Evidence from large American cities, 1980–2010. Urban Affairs Rev. 2018;54: 451–489. doi: 10.1177/1078087416675741 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park Y, Newman GD, Lee J-E, Lee S. Identifying and comparing vacant housing determinants across South Korean cities. Appl Geography. 2021;136: 102566. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Großmann K, Bontje M, Haase A, Mykhnenko V. Shrinking cities: Notes for the further research agenda. Cities. 2013;35: 221–225. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baum-Snow N, Ferreira F. Causal inference in urban and regional economics. 2015;5: 3–68. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kertész J, Török J, Murase Y, Jo H-H, Kaski K. Modeling the complex network of social interactions. In: Rudas T, Péli G, editors. Pathways between social science and computational social science. Cham: Springer; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-54936-7_1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Banzhaf E, Kindler A, Haase D. Monitoring and modeling indicators for urban shrinkage—the city of Leipzig, Germany. In: Center for Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces, editor. Second Workshop of the EARSeL SIG on Remote Sensing of Land Use & Land Cover—Application and Development. Bonn: Center for Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces; 2006. pp. 299–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hattori K, Kaido K, Matsuyuki M. The development of urban shrinkage discourse and policy response in Japan. Cities. 2017;69: 124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.MEXT (Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology). Dataset of economic, social, and educational indicators by prefecture and municipality [in Japanese]. [cited 25 May 2022]. https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/001/1322611.htm [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pearl J. Bayesian networks: a model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning. Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1985. 1985; 329–334. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573668925805842688.bib?lang=ja [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Friedrichs J. A theory of urban decline: Economy, demography and political elites. Urban Stud. 1993;30: 907–917. doi: 10.1080/00420989320080851 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haase A, Rink D, Grossmann K, Bernt M, Mykhnenko V. Conceptualizing urban shrinkage. Environ Plan A Econ Space. 2014;46: 1519–1534. doi: 10.1068/a46269 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haase A, Bernt M, Grossmann K, Mykhnenko V, Rink D. Varieties of shrinkage in European cities. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 2016;23: 86–102. doi: 10.1177/0969776413481985 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang J, Yang Z, Qian X. Driving factors of urban shrinkage: Examining the role of local industrial diversity. Cities. 2020;99: 102646. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102646 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martinez-Fernandez C, Wu C-T, Schatz LK, Taira N, Vargas-Hernández JG. The shrinking mining city: Urban dynamics and contested territory. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2012;36: 245–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01094.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu K, Yao C. Exploring the association between shrinking cities and the loss of external investment: An intercity network analysis. Cities. 2021;119: 103351. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103351 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hu Y, Wang Z, Deng T. Expansion in the shrinking cities: Does place-based policy help to curb urban shrinkage in China? Cities. 2021;113: 103188. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103188 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guo F, Qu X, Ma Y, Tong L. Spatiotemporal pattern evolution and influencing factors of shrinking cities: Evidence from China. Cities. 2021;119: 103391. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103391 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Iwasaki Y. Shrinkage of regional cities in Japan: Analysis of changes in densely inhabited districts. Cities. 2021;113: 103168. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103168 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ma S, Kumakoshi Y, Koizumi H, Yoshimura Y. Determining the association of the built environment and socioeconomic attributes with urban shrinking in Yokohama City. Cities. 2022;120: 103474. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103474 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kato H. How does the location of urban facilities affect the forecasted population change in the Osaka Metropolitan Fringe Area? Sustainability. 2020;13: 110. doi: 10.3390/su13010110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.National Statistics Center. The portal Site of Official Statistics of Japan. [cited 25 May 2022]. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en.
  • 31.Kato H, Takizawa A. Which residential clusters of walkability affect future population from the perspective of real estate prices in the Osaka Metropolitan Area? Sustainability. 2021;13: 13413. doi: 10.3390/su132313413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kato H. Effect of walkability on urban sustainability in the Osaka Metropolitan Fringe Area. Sustainability. 2020;12: 9248. doi: 10.3390/su12219248 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.MEXT (Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology). Economic, social, and educational indicators. In: MEXT [In Japanese]. [cited 30 September 2022]. https://www.mext.go.jp/component/b_menu/other/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/12/06/1322611_01_1.pdf.
  • 34.Conrady S, Jouffe L. Introduction to Bayesian networks & Bayesialab. Bayesia SAS. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fujie T. An exact algorithm for the maximum leaf spanning tree problem. Comput Oper Res. 2003;30: 1931–1944. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(02)00117-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gallego RA, Romero R, Monticelli AJ. Tabu search algorithm for network synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2000;15: 490–495. doi: 10.1109/59.867130 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Guimarães MH, Nunes LC, Barreira AP, Panagopoulos T. What makes people stay in or leave shrinking cities? An empirical study from Portugal. Eur Plan Stud. 2016;24: 1684–1708. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1177492 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.OECD iLibrary. Japan. [cited 25 May 2022]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/1426642c-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/1426642c-en
  • 39.Chen Y, Yang J, Yang R, Xiao X, Xia J (Cecilia). Contribution of urban functional zones to the spatial distribution of urban thermal environment. Build Environ. 2022;216: 109000. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Han D, Yang X, Cai H, Xu X, Qiao Z, Cheng C, et al. Modelling spatial distribution of fine-scale populations based on residential properties. Int J Remote Sens. 2019;40: 5287–5300. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1579387 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Qiao Z, Liu L, Qin Y, Xu X, Wang B, Liu Z. The Impact of Urban Renewal on Land Surface Temperature Changes: A Case Study in the Main City of Guangzhou, China. Remote Sens (Basel). 2020;12: 794. doi: 10.3390/rs12050794 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou C, Zhang D, Cao Y, Wang Y, Zhang G. Spatio–temporal evolution and factors of climate comfort for urban human settlements in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1001064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ren J, Yang J, Zhang Y, Xiao X, Xia JC, Li X, et al. Exploring thermal comfort of urban buildings based on local climate zones. J Clean Prod. 2022;340: 130744. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130744 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Han D, An H, Wang F, Xu X, Qiao Z, Wang M, et al. Understanding seasonal contributions of urban morphology to thermal environment based on boosted regression tree approach. Build Environ. 2022;226: 109770. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109770 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Berchin II, Valduga IB, Garcia J, de Andrade Guerra JBSO. Climate change and forced migrations: An effort towards recognizing climate refugees. Geoforum. 2017;84: 147–150. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Haase A, Athanasopoulou A, Rink D. Urban shrinkage as an emerging concern for European policymaking. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 2016;23: 103–107. doi: 10.1177/0969776413481371 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jun Yang

19 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-35408Urban Modeling of Shrinking Cities through Bayesian Network Analysis Using Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators: Case of Japanese CitiesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kato,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 05 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jun Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.  Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Additional Editor Comments:

Reviewer 1

The authors analyzed the impacts of economic, social, and educational factors on population decline in Japanese shrinking cities. The disadvantages of this research are that the research content is simple, the structure is irrational, and the innovation is insufficient. I focus here only on some points, which are hopefully easy for the authors to take into account in the revision.

(1) Line 33-34, Fig.1 is not clear enough, and i do not understand population change rate in 2010. What does it mean?

(2) Line 37, 'However, these risks have not been identified systematically.', add more details.

(3) Sec Literature Review, conlude it and highlight the innovation.

(4) Sec Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators, why choose this these indicators, explain it. Importantly, Is there collinearity?

(5) Sec Discussions, this part should be improved. Does urban climate change affect city shrinkage and population. Some important references as follows:

1)Understanding seasonal contributions of urban morphology to thermal environment based on boosted regression tree approach, Building and Environment, 2022, 2022, 226: 109770, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109770.

2)Contribution of urban functional zones to the spatial distribution of urban thermal environment, Building and Environment (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109000.

3)Modelling spatial distribution of fine-scale populations based on residential properties, International Journal of Remote Sensing (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1579387.

4)Exploring thermal comfort of urban buildings based on local climate zones, Journal of Cleaner Production (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130744.

5)The impact of urban renewal on land surface temperature changes: A case study in the main city of Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050794.

(6) Sec Conclusions, conclude the main colusions of this study, remove references.

(7) English language should be improved.

Reviewer 2

The author used bayesian network analysis to explored the influencing factors of shrinking cities from the perspective of economic, social and education. The topic is innovative, while there also have some problems should be revised as follow.

1.There are lack of the theory or logic framework to illustrate the relationship of shrinking cities with the indicators. The author should not only calculated the correlation of them.

2. There should have some formulas or models in methods.

3.The websites of data source should not only be added in references, but also needed to be added in data source.

4.In line 112, the authors mentioned population change rate. Is it refer to average population change rate in ten years or total population change rate in ten years.

5.In line 125, the authors illustrated there have 208 out of 259 indicators formed a significant network. However, there only have 14 indicators with STE more than 0.2. The author should listed all of correlation of 208 indicators.

6.What's the difference of section bayesian network of shrinking cities with correlation of indicatiors. Maybe these two sections could be integrated into one section.

7.The significance of correlation should be mentioned. Such as 99%,95% and so on.

8.In line 51, the authors could re-draw a new figure of study area to show the 1316 cities clearly by GIS. The color of study area and non-study area are different.

9.In table 1, what's the BMI refer to in different ranges? It should be explained clearly.

10.In conclusion, the author should illustrate some conclusions in your own research. What can be concluded by your research? It is not suitable to cite others researches.

11.The serial number of sub-title should be added.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors analyzed the impacts of economic, social, and educational factors on population decline in Japanese shrinking cities. The disadvantages of this research are that the research content is simple, the structure is irrational, and the innovation is insufficient. I focus here only on some points, which are hopefully easy for the authors to take into account in the revision.

(1) Line 33-34, Fig.1 is not clear enough, and i do not understand population change rate in 2010. What does it mean?

(2) Line 37, 'However, these risks have not been identified systematically.', add more details.

(3) Sec Literature Review, conlude it and highlight the innovation.

(4) Sec Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators, why choose this these indicators, explain it. Importantly, Is there collinearity?

(5) Sec Discussions, this part should be improved. Does urban climate change affect city shrinkage and population. Some important references as follows:

1)Understanding seasonal contributions of urban morphology to thermal environment based on boosted regression tree approach, Building and Environment, 2022, 2022, 226: 109770, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109770.

2)Contribution of urban functional zones to the spatial distribution of urban thermal environment, Building and Environment (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109000.

3)Modelling spatial distribution of fine-scale populations based on residential properties, International Journal of Remote Sensing (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1579387.

4)Exploring thermal comfort of urban buildings based on local climate zones, Journal of Cleaner Production (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130744.

5)The impact of urban renewal on land surface temperature changes: A case study in the main city of Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050794.

(6) Sec Conclusions, conclude the main colusions of this study, remove references.

(7) English language should be improved.

Reviewer #2: The author used bayesian network analysis to explored the influencing factors of shrinking cities from the perspective of economic, social and education. The topic is innovative, while there also have some problems should be revised as follow.

1.There are lack of the theory or logic framework to illustrate the relationship of shrinking cities with the indicators. The author should not only calculated the correlation of them.

2. There should have some formulas or models in methods.

3.The websites of data source should not only be added in references, but also needed to be added in data source.

4.In line 112, the authors mentioned population change rate. Is it refer to average population change rate in ten years or total population change rate in ten years.

5.In line 125, the authors illustrated there have 208 out of 259 indicators formed a significant network. However, there only have 14 indicators with STE more than 0.2. The author should listed all of correlation of 208 indicators.

6.What's the difference of section bayesian network of shrinking cities with correlation of indicatiors. Maybe these two sections could be integrated into one section.

7.The significance of correlation should be mentioned. Such as 99%,95% and so on.

8.In line 51, the authors could re-draw a new figure of study area to show the 1316 cities clearly by GIS. The color of study area and non-study area are different.

9.In table 1, what's the BMI refer to in different ranges? It should be explained clearly.

10.In conclusion, the author should illustrate some conclusions in your own research. What can be concluded by your research? It is not suitable to cite others researches.

11.The serial number of sub-title should be added.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 10;18(4):e0284134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284134.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


8 Mar 2023

Dear Reviewer:

We appreciate the reviewer for the generous comment on the manuscript. We have attached our response letter. We believe that the manuscript is now suitable for publication in Plos One and look forward to hearing from you concerning your decision.

Yours sincerely

Attachment

Submitted filename: 3_Response to Reviewers_20230308.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Jun Yang

15 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-35408R1Urban Modeling of Shrinking Cities through Bayesian Network Analysis Using Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators: Case of Japanese CitiesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kato,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 29 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jun Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The quality of this manuscript have improved after revision. There only have two problems should be revised. 1.The authors choose population change rate aged 0-14 and population aged over 65. Why the authors not choose age 15-64. It should be explained simply. 2.Some relevant references should be cited. Spatial evolution of population change in Northeast China during 1992–2018. Science of the Total Environment.2021,776:146023.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146023. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of urban land area and PM2.5 concentration in China.Urban Climate,2022,45:101268.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101268. Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Primary and Secondary Educational Resources for Relocated Children of Migrant Workers:The Case of Liaoning Province.Complexity,volume 2020,Article ID7457109,13 pages.doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7457109. Theoretical framework and research prospect of the impact of China's digital economic development on population.Frontiers in Earth Science,2022,10:988608. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.988608. Differences in Accessibility of Public Health Facilities in Hierarchical Municipalities and the Spatial Pattern Characteristics of Their Services in Doumen District,China.Land 2021, 10, 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111249. Spatiotemporal relationship characteristic of climate comfort of urban human settlement environment and population density in China. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022,10:953725.doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.953725. Spatio–temporal evolution and factors of climate comfort for urban human settlements in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022,10:1001064. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1001064

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The quality of this manuscript have improved after revision. There only have two problems should be revised.

1.The authors choose population change rate aged 0-14 and population aged over 65. Why the authors not choose age 15-64. It should be explained simply.

2.Some relevant references should be cited.

Spatial evolution of population change in Northeast China during 1992–2018. Science of the Total Environment.2021,776:146023.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146023.

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of urban land area and PM2.5 concentration in China.Urban Climate,2022,45:101268.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101268.

Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Primary and Secondary Educational Resources for Relocated Children of Migrant Workers:The Case of Liaoning Province.Complexity,volume 2020,Article ID7457109,13 pages.doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7457109.

Theoretical framework and research prospect of the impact of China's digital economic development on population.Frontiers in Earth Science,2022,10:988608. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.988608.

Differences in Accessibility of Public Health Facilities in Hierarchical Municipalities and the Spatial Pattern Characteristics of Their Services in Doumen District,China.Land 2021, 10, 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111249.

Spatiotemporal relationship characteristic of climate comfort of urban human settlement environment and population density in China. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022,10:953725.doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.953725.

Spatio–temporal evolution and factors of climate comfort for urban human settlements in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022,10:1001064. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1001064

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 10;18(4):e0284134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284134.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


23 Mar 2023

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to strengthen our manuscript with your valuable comments. I have worked hard to incorporate your feedback and hope that these revisions persuade you to accept our submission.

Attachment

Submitted filename: 3_Response to Reviewers_20230319.pdf

Decision Letter 2

Jun Yang

27 Mar 2023

Urban Modeling of Shrinking Cities through Bayesian Network Analysis Using Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators: Case of Japanese Cities

PONE-D-22-35408R2

Dear Dr. Kato,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jun Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Accept

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors have revised all the problems. All the problems have been addressed. I think it could be accepted.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Jun Yang

31 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-35408R2

Urban Modeling of Shrinking Cities through Bayesian Network Analysis Using Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators: Case of Japanese Cities

Dear Dr. Kato:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jun Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Results of the economic, social, and educational indicators.

    The table below shows the 259 indicators with their average, standard deviation score, standardized total effect, mutual information, and p-value.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 3_Response to Reviewers_20230308.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 3_Response to Reviewers_20230319.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    Economic, Social, and Educational Indicators cannot be shared publicly because of governments’ confidentiality. Data are available from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Institutional Data Access (contact via MEXT, +81-5253-4111, https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/001/1322611.htm) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES