Abstract
This investigation was undertaken primarily to examine the possibility of hearing damage from industrial ultrasonic equipment. In the factory concerned, ultrasonic washers and drills were used at a number of different locations, and girls working 12 ft (3·6 m.) away from one bank of three small washers complained of unpleasant subjective effects which included fatigue, persistent headaches, nausea, and tinnitus.
As personnel working in the vicinity of similar washers in other parts of the factory did not complain of these effects, it seemed possible that the noise had been transmitted along a column of air in a bank of dryboxes. Enclosure of these washers by a sliding screen of Perspex had completely abated the trouble.
Sound pressure level measurements taken in the positions occupied by the operators indicated that, when the effects occur, they are probably caused by high sound levels at the upper audio-frequencies present with the ultrasonic noise, and this was supported by a limited laboratory investigation. Audiometric investigation showed that hearing damage due to noise from these industrial ultrasonic devices is unlikely. However, extrapolations of currently accepted hearing damage risk criteria may be valid in predicting the occurrence of these subjective effects.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Acton W. I. A review of hearing damage risk criteria. Ann Occup Hyg. 1967 Apr;10(2):143–153. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/10.2.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DAVIS H., PARRACK H. O., ELDREDGE D. H. Hazards of intense sound and ultrasound. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1949 Sep;58(3):732–738. doi: 10.1177/000348944905800310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DICKSON E. D. D., CHADWICK D. L. Observations on disturbances of equilibrium and other symptoms induced by jet-engine noise. J Laryngol Otol. 1951 Mar;65(3):154–165. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100009919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skillern C. P. Human response to measured sound pressure levels from ultrasonic devices. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1965 Mar-Apr;26(2):132–136. doi: 10.1080/00028896509342712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TAYLOR W., BURNS W., MAIR A. A MOBILE UNIT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HEARING. Ann Occup Hyg. 1964 Dec;7:343–352. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/7.4.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WHITTLE L. S., ROBINSON D. W. British normal threshold of hearing. Nature. 1961 Feb 25;189:617–618. doi: 10.1038/189617a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]