Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jan 17;18(5):811–812. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.01.011

Heartbeat music

Edward G Lakatta 1
PMCID: PMC10089232  NIHMSID: NIHMS1881997  PMID: 33465513

The heart is a central player within a hierarchical system of clocks operating within an autonomic neurovisceral axis that creates and synchronizes rhythmic functions ranging from milliseconds to days and beyond.1

Neurons within the ganglia embedded on the epicardial surface—“the Little Brain of the Heart”2—extend into to the sinoatrial node (SAN), encountering and embracing SAN pacemaker cells. Afferent electrochemical and mechanical “vibrations” emerge from the SAN to communicate with other components of the neurovisceral axis on a beat-to-beat basis informing on neurotransmitter input required for the heart-brain grand symphony (H-BGS) that emerges when the heart beats.1,2 The H-BGS is composed of variations that differ in tempo and timing; owing to variable degrees of synchronization of brain-heart clock periods,3,4 these variations are broadcast to the body surface on time, frequency, nonlinear, and heart rate (HR) fragmentation electrocardiogram “channels.” D’Souza et al5 of Mark R. Boyett Lab in the United Kingdom as well as numerous European collaborators tuned into “H-BGS” Circadian Variations (“Eine Kleine Nachtmusik”) to discover whether the brain or the heart conducts the Circadian Variations: the vigilant, hypothalamic “clock genes” or “cardiac clock genes”, coding for proteins that operate the SAN cell ultradian “coupled-clock system variations” (C-CSVs).3,4,69

C-CSVs emerge when the sarcoplasmic reticulum, a “Ca2+ clock”, that continuously cycles Ca2+ via a criticality mechanism,610 couples to an ensemble of surface membrane ion channels (“M clock”, operating on a limit-cycle mechanism10 to produce current oscillations that underlie action potentials (APs). C-CSVs, are the most beautiful variations of H-BGS11 and kinetic transitions in Ca2+ and membrane potential (MP) during each AP cycle are the most basic motifs within the C-CSVs.8,9 The AP firing rate and rhythm informon the degree to which Ca2+ and MP transitions are synchronized during AP cycles.8,9 These Ca2+ and voltage transitions throughout AP cycles are cues that not only regulate the activation-inactivation kinetics of clock proteins in a time-dependent manner, but are also regulated by the activation states of the very proteins they regulate. In other terms, C-C proteins “dance to their own music” during each AP cycle. The presence of beat-to-beat (and diurnal) variability of AP cycle intervals in vitro, or in HR in vivo, indicates that C-C system functions never achieve true steady states from one beat to the next or throughout the day and night.9

Although heart rates (HRs) of species from mice to humans differ by 10-fold, kinetics of Ca2+ and MP transitions throughout AP cycles are self-similar to each other across species.8 And because the kinetics of these Ca2+ and MP transitions determine the mean AP cycle interval,3,4,69 kinetic transitions in SAN cells across species and AP cycle intervals in vitro, and HRs in vivo, are self-similar to each other, that is, they obey a power law.8

A recent discovery has added an entire new layer of complexity to C-C variations that extends well beyond individual isolated SAN cells.12 Specifically, local oscillatory Ca2+ signals that are heterogeneous in phase, amplitude, and frequency occur within a meshwork of HCN4 expressing cells that extends nearly the entire length and depth of the central mouse SAN.12

“Neuronal Variations” via vagal and sympathetic “motifs” modulate the tempo and timing of the SAN C-CSVs on millisecond timescales by affecting the degree to which criticality and limit-cycle mechanisms of “Ca2+ and M clocks”10 are synchronized or coupled during AP cycles and, on this basis, modulate the SAN cell AP firing rate and rhythm.3,4,69

D’Souza et al5 used pharmacological, surgical, and genetic tools in order to ablate Neuronal Variations within the H-BGS, thereby exposing the SAN C-CSVs. They measured diurnal expression of SAN C-CS genes and confirmed marked diurnal expression of genes coding for ion channels of the “M clock” (for review, see reference 5) and discovered that both HCN4 channels of the M clock, activated by cyclic-AMP (cAMP),13 and calcium-calmodulin activated kinase II (CAMKII), which phosphorylates proteins within both “M and Ca2+ clocks”,3,4,69 also manifest circadian variability. D’Souza et al demonstrated that the hyperpolarization-activated inward current, (If), which they believed to be the “hallmark “of the C-CSVs, also manifests circadian variability, and that ablation of the cardiac βmal1 gene abolished circadian variability of HCN4 and If.5 Similar links between cardiac circadian genes and functions intrinsic to the ultradian C-CS of SAN cells had been noted previously (for review, see reference 4).

So, what does If contribute to the C-CSVs? One predominant view had been that If was the pacemaker13 of the C-CS system: acceleration of the HR in response to β-adrenergic receptor stimulation was attributed to an increase in If activation by cAMP,13 suggesting that If plays on the C-CS “offense.” But knock-in of HCN channels that are insensitive to cAMP,14 pharmacological inhibition of If, or genetic ablation of HCN4 (for review, see reference 15) and If reduction in parametric sensitivity analyses in numerical models16 all result in sinus bradycardia, or sinus arrest, and chronotropic incompetence,14 but do not have much of an effect on the b-adrenergic receptor stimulation-induced increase in rate at which the C-CS fires APs.1416 These data1416 point to the SAN cell “Ca2+ clock” as the C-CS “quarterback” and to If as a indenspensible “middle linebacker” of the C-CS “defense.”

So, in reality, to achieve nighttime bradycardia, nature arranges that circadian variations occur within both “M and Ca2+ clocks” of the C-CS intrinsic to SAN cells.3,4,69 These circadian changes partially uncouple3,4,69 the criticality and limit-cycle mechanisms10 within the C-CS. The reduction in If facilitates nighttime bradycardia by weakening the C-CS “defense” against clock uncoupling.1416 Concurrent shifts in “vagal motifs” within Neuronal Variations of H-BGS effected by input from hypothalmic clock genes creates additional desynchronization within the C-CSV to further ensure nighttime bradycardia.4 It is likely that nature, in using mechanisms intrinsic to the SAN in conjunction with hypothalmic input, also partially desynchronizes “neighborhoods” of cells with the SAN12,14 to guarantee nighttime bradycardia.

Acknowledgments

I thank Victor A. Maltsev, PhD, for thoughtful reading of the manuscript, and I am grateful to Loretta E. Lakatta, BSN, for her persevering editorial assistance.

Footnotes

Disclosures: The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Shivkumar K, Ajijola OA, Anand I, et al. Clinical neurocardiology defining the value of neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics. J Physiol 2016;594:3911–3954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Armour JA. Potential clinical relevance of the ‘little brain’ on the mammalian heart. Exp Physiol 2008;93:165–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lakatta EG, Malsev VA, Vinogradova TM. A coupled SYSTEM of intracellular Ca2+ clocks and surface membrane voltage clocks control the timekeeping mechanism of the heart’s pacemaker. Circ Res 2010;106:659–673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lakatta EG, Yaniv Y, Maltsev VA. Minding the gaps that link intrinsic circadian clock within the heart to its intrinsic ultradian pacemaker clocks: focus on “The cardiomyocyte molecular clock, regulation of Scn5A, arrhythmia susceptibility. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2013;304:C941–C944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.D’Souza A, Wang Y, Anderson C, et al. A circadian clock in the sinus node mediates day-night rhythms in Hcn4 and heart rate. Heart Rhythm 2021;18:801–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lyashkov AE, Behar J, Lakatta EG, Yaniv Y, Maltsev VA. Positive feedback mechanisms among local Ca releases, NCX, and ICaL ignite pacemaker action potentials. Biophys J 2018;114:1176–1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsutsui K, Monfredi OL, Sirenko-Tagirova SG, et al. A coupled-clock system drives the automaticity of human sinoatrial nodal pacemaker cells. Sci Signal 2018;11:eaap7608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sirenko ST, Tsutsui K, Tarasov K, et al. Self-similar synchronization of calcium and membrane potential transitions during AP cycles predict HR across species [published online ahead of print December 22, 2020]. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2020.10.26.355412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang D, Lyashkov AE, Morrell CH, et al. Self-similar action potential cycle-to-cycle variability of Ca2+ and current oscillators in cardiac pacemaker cells [published online ahead of print September 2, 2020]. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2020.09.01.277756. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weiss JM, Zhilin Qu The sinus node: still mysterious after all these years. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020;6:1841–1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lakatta EG, Maltsev VA. Reprogramming paces the heart. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:31–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bychkov R, Juhaszova M, Tsutsui K, et al. Synchronized cardiac impulses emerge from heterogeneous local calcium signals within and among cells of pacemaker tissue. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020;6:907–931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.DiFrancesco D, Tortora P. Direct activation of cardiac pacemaker channels by intracellular cyclic AMP. Nature 1991;351:145–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fenske S, Hennis K, Rötzer RD, et al. cAMP-dependent regulation of HCN4 controls the tonic entrainment process in sinoatrial node pacemaker cells. Nat Commun 2020;11:5555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vinogradova TM, Lakatta EG. Regulation of basal and reserve cardiac pacemaker function by interactions of cAMP-mediated PKA-dependent Ca2+ cycling with surface membrane channels. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2009;47:456–474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maltsev VA, Lakatta EG. Synergism of coupled subsarcolemmal Ca2+ clocks and sarcolemmal voltage clocks confers robust and flexible pacemaker function in a novel pacemaker cell model. Am J Physiol 2009;296:H594–H615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES