Abstract
Lung mast cells are important in host defense, and excessive proliferation or activation of these cells can cause chronic inflammatory disorders like asthma. Two parallel pathways induced by KIT–stem cell factor (SCF) and FcεRI–immunoglobulin E interactions are critical for the proliferation and activation of mast cells, respectively. Here, we report that mast cell-expressed membrane protein1 (MCEMP1), a lung-specific surface protein, functions as an adaptor for KIT, which promotes SCF-mediated mast cell proliferation. MCEMP1 elicits intracellular signaling through its cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif and forms a complex with KIT to enhance its autophosphorylation and activation. Consequently, MCEMP1 deficiency impairs SCF-induced peritoneal mast cell proliferation in vitro and lung mast cell expansion in vivo. Mcemp1-deficient mice exhibit reduced airway inflammation and lung impairment in chronic asthma mouse models. This study shows lung-specific MCEMP1 as an adaptor for KIT to facilitate SCF-mediated mast cell proliferation.
Subject terms: Asthma, Chronic inflammation, Mechanisms of disease, Mast cells, Mucosal immunology
Mast cells are activated and proliferate during allergic reactions which can involve mast cell specific proteins. Here the authors show that mast cell-expressed membrane protein1 (MCEMP1) is an adaptor for KIT to promote SCF mediated mast cell proliferation and lack of MCEMP1 reduces inflammation in mouse asthma models.
Introduction
Mast cell-expressed membrane protein1 (MCEMP1) is a type II transmembrane protein that is highly expressed in human lung tissue1. MCEMP1 is primarily expressed in myeloid lineage immune cells, such as lung-resident mast cells and alveolar macrophages. MCEMP1 is one of the top inducible genes in many inflammatory diseases, such as asthma2–4, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis5,6, cancer7, sepsis8,9, and stroke10,11. Mounting evidence suggests MCEMP1 as a critical factor in allergic and inflammatory lung diseases, with the level of MCEMP1 expression positively correlates with disease severity. For instance, asthma patients at exacerbation stage exhibit significantly higher expression of MCEMP1 compared to the recovery stage2. Furthermore, a single cell mass cytometry analysis of patients at high risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis shows higher expression of MCEMP1 in granulocytes than those from patients at low risk6. Collectively, these findings indicate that MCEMP1 may have a crucial function in pulmonary inflammation. However, the underlying molecular mechanism by which MCEMP1 contributes to the pathogenesis of lung inflammatory diseases has not been understood.
Mast cells are primarily located on tissues that are exposed to the external environment such as skin, conjunctiva, lung, and gastrointestinal track, as well as other tissues such as brain meninges and adipose tissue12,13. Although rare in population, mast cells indispensably contribute a unique and versatile function in human health and disease. As one of the important tissue-resident immune cells, mast cells elicit host defense immune responses against helminths infection14,15. Mast cells also provide protection against bee and snake venoms, as well as endogenous peptide toxins such as endothelin-1 and neurotensin, by producing peptidases to inactivate the toxins16–20. On the other hand, aberrant proliferation or activation of mast cells is associated not only with many allergic disorders such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, systemic anaphylaxis, mast cell activation syndrome, and mastocytosis, but also with nonallergic conditions, including stroke and cardiovascular diseases21–24.
Mast cells respond to various external signals through the coordination of numerous activating and inhibitory surface receptors, including high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) and KIT receptor25. FcεRI activates mast cells, while the KIT receptor promotes mast cell proliferation. When exposed to allergens, the high-affinity receptor FcεRI is crosslinked by IgE, leading to rapid degranulation of mast cells and the release of various granule-stored mediators, including bioactive amines (histamine and serotonin), mast cell proteases (tryptase, chymase, and carboxypeptidase), proteoglycans (heparin), β-hexosaminidase, lipid mediators (leukotrienes and prostaglandins), neuropeptide substance P, and other cytokines and chemokines26. Subsequently, mast cell mediators recruit immune cells, increase vascular permeability and smooth muscle contraction, and activate epithelial, neuronal, and stromal cells27,28.
On the other hand, KIT is a type III receptor tyrosine kinase that provides signals for the growth and survival of mast cells. Activation of KIT occurs upon binding to either the membrane-bound or soluble form of stem cell factor (SCF), a growth factor that is expressed by endothelial cells and fibroblasts. SCF-mediated activation of KIT leads to autophosphorylation of its own tyrosine residues in the intracellular region, acting as docking sites for downstream signaling molecules29. Structural analysis shows that binding of SCF induces dimerization or oligomerization of KIT, which leads to trans-autophosphorylation of KIT and the subsequent release of its autoinhibitory constraint30–33. Activation of KIT induces downstream signal transduction pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, phosphatidylinositol 3´-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathway, phospholipase C pathway, and Lyn and Lck tyrosine kinase signaling pathway. The signaling amplitude of SCF-KIT axis in mast cells is dependent on full KIT receptor agonism, thus engineered SCF that acts as a partial agonist impedes KIT dimerization and fails to induce mast cell proliferation34.
The essential activity of KIT in mast cell proliferation is demonstrated in mice with Kit mutations, such as Kitw-sh and Kitw-v, which exhibit mast cell-deficiency and have been commonly used to investigate the role of mast cells in allergic disorders35,36. Also, aberrant KIT kinase activity has been linked to various cancers and allergic disorders29. For instance, the oncogenic KIT mutations, such as KIT D816V and KIT V560G, lead to constitutively active tyrosine kinase activity and growth factor-independent proliferation of mast cells in tissue lesions associated with mast cell tumors and systemic mastocytosis37,38. Thus, multi-selective kinase inhibitors such as imatinib and dasatinib have been used clinically to reduce mast cell burdens in cancer and other allergic disorders39–41.
Particularly, the SCF-KIT signaling is engaged in maintaining mast cells within lung tissue. The extent of mast cells accumulation in inflamed areas of allergic lung tissues correlates with the severity and progression of asthma, underscoring the pivotal function of mast cells in the pathophysiology of asthma35,36,42,43. However, despite this striking association, it remains unclear how mast cells expand within the lungs of individuals with asthma and whether dysregulation of mast cell proliferation influence the progression and severity of asthma.
In this work, we elucidate the pathological activity of MCEMP1-mediated amplification of KIT receptor signaling in mast cell proliferation, and its impact on the progression of airway inflammation and lung function impairment in a chronic asthma mouse model. This discovery of MCEMP1-mediated mast cell expansion could be important to the development of therapeutic strategies to alleviate airway mast cell burdens in severe or poorly controlled lung inflammation.
Results
MCEMP1 induces intracellular signal transduction in an ITAM-dependent manner
The cytoplasmic domain of MCEMP1 contains a highly conserved immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM), an essential signaling motif that links immunoreceptors to downstream signaling machinery (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). To investigate the functional phosphorylation of the putative cytoplasmic ITAM, we substituted the tyrosine residue with phenylalanine (referred to as YF). In addition, we incorporated a Flag epitope at the carboxyl-terminal extracellular domain of MCEMP1 to employ anti-Flag antibody-mediated stimulation of MCEMP1. When C57 mouse mast cells or HMC-1 human mast cells stably expressing either wild-type (WT) or mutant (YF) MCEMP1 were stimulated with Flag antibody, WT MCEMP1, but not the YF mutant, was rapidly phosphorylated (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1f).
To identify cellular proteins interacting with the cytoplasmic ITAM-containing domain of MCEMP1, a GST pull-down assay was performed using bacterial GST fusion proteins. Tyrosine-phosphorylated GST/MCEMP1-C(P) was produced from E. coli strain TKX1, which contains the elk tyrosine kinase. Wild-type GST/MCEMP1-C(P) fusion protein (GST-WT) or mutant protein (GST-YF) purified from TKX1 was used as an affinity column for HMC-1 cell lysates (Supplementary Fig. 1b). In addition, lysates of C57 cells expressing MCEMP1 WT were subjected to protein purification with anti-Flag antibody. Mass spectrometry analysis of polypeptides that specifically interacted with GST-WT or full-length MCEMP1 WT, but not with GST or GST-YF mutant, identified two adaptor signaling proteins, proline-rich-motif-containing son of sevenless 1/2 (SOS1/2) and SH2-SH3 domain-containing growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) (Supplementary Fig. 1b,c and Supplementary Table 1). When lysates of 293T cells exogenously expressing SOS1 or SOS2 were used for GST pull-down assay, GST-WT readily bound to endogenous Grb2 and exogenous SOS1/2 (Supplementary Fig. 1d). In contrast, GST and GST-YF showed no detectable interaction with Grb2 or SOS1/2. Interestingly, treatment of the SOS SH3 domain inhibitor (VPPPVPPRRR), a biologically active peptide that blocks SOS-Grb2 interaction, effectively reduced SOS-GST-WT interaction without affecting Grb2-GST-WT interaction (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Finally, full-length MCEMP1 readily interacted with Grb2 and SOS1 in C57 or HMC-1 cells in an ITAM-dependent manner (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1f). These results suggest that the SH2 domain of Grb2 interacts with the cytoplasmic ITAM of MCEMP1 in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner, whereas the SH3 domain of Grb2 interacts with the proline-rich motif of SOS1/2, forming a MCEMP1-Grb2-SOS1/2 signalosome.
Stimulation of Flag antibody that induced the activation and phosphorylation of MCEMP1 triggered downstream signal transduction of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and MAP kinase pathways (Figs. 1c, d). Strikingly, MCEMP1-mediated activation of MAP kinase pathway was only observed in C57 mast cells, but not in Raw264.7 macrophages or DC2.4 dendritic cells (Fig. 1d). In addition, MCEMP1 activation robustly induced expressions of several cytokine and chemokine genes including Il4, Il13, Il6, Tnf, Ifng, Ccl4, and Ccl11 in C57 mast cells, but not in DC2.4 dendritic cells or J774.1 macrophages (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1g). Flag antibody mediated MCEMP1 activation also induced intracellular calcium mobilization in C57 mast cells (Fig. 1f). On the other hand, MCEMP1 activation showed no effect on DNP-specific IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation, suggesting that MCEMP1 signaling is independent of the FcεRI-IgE pathway (Fig. 1g). Collectively, these data demonstrate that MCEMP1 forms a signalosome with Grb2 and SOS1/2 in a cytoplasmic ITAM-dependent manner, which induces multiple downstream signal transduction and elicits intracellular calcium mobilization and inflammatory cytokine production.
MCEMP1 enhances SCF-induced mast cell proliferation
To investigate a physiological function of MCEMP1 in vivo, we generated Mcemp1–/– mice using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Deletion of 11 nucleotides at the exon 1 of Mcemp1 resulted in a frameshift that created a premature termination codon (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b). Loss of MCEMP1 expression was confirmed by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry of the lungs of Mcemp1–/– mice (Fig. 2a and Supplementary 2c). To induce primary mast cell differentiation and proliferation in vitro, purified cells from the peritoneal lavage or bone marrow of Mcemp1+/+ or Mcemp1–/– mice were cultured with SCF and IL-3. Strikingly, the numbers of expanded peritoneal cells (PC) from Mcemp1–/– mice were markedly lower than those from Mcemp1+/+ mice (Fig. 2b). In contrast, bone marrow cells (BM) from Mcemp1–/– mice showed comparable levels of the numbers to those from Mcemp1+/+ mice (Fig. 2c). When KIT-positive cells were isolated from the peritoneum lavage using CD117 MicroBeads and subsequently cultured with SCF and IL-3, the numbers of KIT-positive cells from Mcemp1–/– mice were also markedly lower than those from Mcemp1+/+ mice (Fig. 2d). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the total numbers of bone marrow-derived macrophage from Mcemp1–/– mice compared to those from Mcemp1+/+ mice (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis showed that the percentages of KIT+FcεRI+ PC and BM from Mcemp1–/– mice were similar to those from Mcemp1+/+ mice (Supplementary Fig. 2e, f).
We further examined the effect of individual growth factor, SCF or IL-3, on the proliferation of PC and BM from Mcemp1–/– mice or Mcemp1+/+ mice. It should be noted that SCF or IL-3 individual treatment of PC or BM-induced mast cell proliferation at considerably reduced level than both treatments. Intriguingly, SCF-treated PC from Mcemp1–/– mice showed minimal proliferation compared to SCF-treated PC from Mcemp1+/+ mice, whereas IL-3-induced growth of PC from either Mcemp1–/– or Mcemp1+/+ mice was similar (Figs. 2e, f). In contrast, SCF-treated BM or IL-3-treated BM from Mcemp1–/– or Mcemp1+/+ mice showed minimal or no growth in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 2g, h). This indicates that MCEMP1 enhances SCF-induced mast cell proliferation in vitro. We also performed RNA-seq analysis to investigate whether peritoneal cell-derived mast cells (PCMC) exhibited similar gene expression patterns to pulmonary mast cells. Peritoneal cells were in vitro cultured with SCF and IL-3 for 13 days. KIT and FcεRI double-positive cells (KIT+FcεRI+) and KIT single-positive cells (KIT+FcεRI–) were isolated by cell sorter and subjected to RNA-seq (Supplementary Fig. 2i). We utilized the Tabula Muris repository of single-cell transcriptome data as a reference for lung mast cell gene expression44. We evaluated single-cell transcriptome of mouse lungs and compiled a list of genes that were specifically upregulated in lung mast cell. The analyses showed that KIT+FcεRI+ PCMC expressed mast cell signature genes that were similar to those enriched in pulmonary mast cells, including mast cell carboxypeptidase A3 (Cpa3), mast cell protease (Mcpt8), and specific transcription factor (Gata2). These results indicate that the gene expression profiles of peritoneal cell-derived mast cells and pulmonary mast cells are highly similar.
To further address whether MCEMP1 deficiency has an impact on SCF-induced mast cell expansion in vivo, 12-week-old Mcemp1+/+ or Mcemp1–/– mice were intranasally challenged with 1 mg/kg of endotoxin-free SCF or saline every 4 days for a total of 3 times (Fig. 2g). Intranasal instillation of SCF significantly elevated KIT+FcεRI+ mast cell population among the total CD45+ immune cells in the lungs of Mcemp1+/+ mice (Fig. 2h). In contrast, in vivo SCF-induced lung mast cell expansion was considerably reduced in Mcemp1−/− mice compared to Mcemp1+/+ mice (Fig. 2h). Collectively, these results indicate that MCEMP1 is a critical factor for efficient SCF-induced proliferation of peritoneal mast cells in vitro and lung resident mast cells in vivo.
MCEMP1 interacts with and activates KIT signaling activity
Mechanistically, immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated a strong interaction between human MCEMP1 and human KIT, as well as between mouse MCEMP1 and mouse KIT (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 3a). We also observed that human MCEMP1 interacted with mouse KIT receptor (Supplementary Fig. 3b). MCEMP1 also interacted with endogenous KIT in C57 mast cells stably expressing MCEMP1 (Supplementary Fig. 3c). KIT kinase-dead mutant (D794N) was capable of binding to MCEMP1, indicating that the kinase activity of KIT is not required for MCEMP1 interaction (Fig. 3b). We further constructed various deletion mutants of KIT to identify the binding domain(s) that are responsible for MCEMP1 binding. The extracellular region of KIT comprises of five Ig-like domains (designated as D1 to D5) and the intracellular region of KIT contains a juxta membrane domain (JM), tyrosine kinase domain-1 (KD1), kinase insert domain (KI), and tyrosine kinase domain-2 (KD2). The extracellular domain deletion mutant (ΔD1-D4) of KIT showed efficient MCEMP1 binding, indicating that the intracellular domain of KIT is critical for the interaction with MCEMP1 (Fig. 3c). While ΔJM or ΔKD1 mutant maintained MCEMP1 binding, ΔJM-KD1 mutant lost MCEMP1 binding, suggesting that either the JM or KD1 domain of KIT is responsible for the binding of MCEMP1 (Fig. 3c). Moreover, the JM and KD1 region (JM-KD1) of KIT efficiently interacted with MCEMP1, indicating that the JM-KD1 region of KIT is sufficient for MCEMP1 interaction (Supplementary Fig. 3d).
Interestingly, ectopic expression of WT MCEMP1, but not YF mutant, increased KIT Y719 phosphorylation (Fig. 3d); anti-Flag-mediated MCEMP1 activation further increased KIT phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. 3e); and expression of WT MCEMP1, but not YF mutant, markedly elevated SCF-mediated KIT phosphorylation and downstream signal transduction including MEK, JNK, and ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 3e). In addition, expression of WT MCEMP1, but not YF mutant, drastically enhanced SCF-induced Il6 and Il13 expressions (Figs. 3f, g). In addition, MCEMP1 WT or YF mutant was present as a dimer or trimer form regardless of αFlag or SCF stimulation, indicating that MCEMP1 may function as an oligomer to amplify its signaling activity (Supplementary Fig. 3f). Collectively, these results indicate that MCEMP1 interacts with and activates KIT activity and downstream signal transduction in an ITAM-dependent manner.
MCEMP1 deficiency alters gene expression related to mast cell proliferation
Since MCEMP1 expression is involved in mast cell proliferation, we examined the transcriptomic changes in Mcemp1–/– PC versus Mcemp1+/+ PC cultured with SCF and IL-3 for 9 days. Mcemp1–/– PC exhibited a total of 1193 downregulated and 340 upregulated genes in comparison to Mcemp1+/+ PC (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) showed that compared to Mcemp1+/+ PC, Mcemp1–/– PC exhibited downregulation of gene sets associated with phagosome formation/FAK signaling, TREM1 signaling, and MAPK signaling, while demonstrating upregulation of gene sets related to aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling (Figs. 4a, b). Network IPA identified key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in the reduced proliferation of Mcemp1–/– PC (Supplementary Fig. 4b). In addition, IPA upstream analysis identified that signaling molecules (IFN-γ, NF-κB, and MAPK) and transcription factors [SREBF1 and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF)] were significantly repressed in Mcemp1–/– PC compared to Mcemp1+/+ PC (Fig. 4c). Overall, transcriptomic profiling indicates that deficiency of MCEMP1 significantly disrupts multiple intracellular signaling pathways, leading to a decrease in PC proliferation in vitro.
SCF-mediated KIT receptor activation has been shown to induce downstream signal transduction of MAPK and MITF that facilitates cell proliferation45–48. We examined whether MCEMP1 deficiency impairs SCF-mediated MAPK signal transduction and MITF activation in PCMC from Mcemp1+/+ mice or Mcemp1–/– mice. KIT-positive PC were cultured with SCF for 4 to 7 days in vitro. The levels of phosphorylated JNK (T183/Y185 residues) and MITF (Ser180/73 residues) were markedly lower in Mcemp1–/– PC when compared to Mcemp1+/+ PC (Figs. 4d, e). These results indicate that MCEMP1 is required for the efficient phosphorylation and activation of JNK and MITF in response to SCF-mediated KIT receptor activation. In addition, the expression of G1/S-phase cyclins (Ccne1, Ccna1) and mitotic cyclins (Ccnb1 and Ccnb2) was significantly decreased in Mcemp1–/– PC compared to Mcemp1+/+ PC, suggesting that MCEMP1 deficiency results in a reduction of cell cycle progression of peritoneal cell-derived mast cells (Fig. 4f). Collectively, these results suggest that MCEMP1 interacts with and activates KIT activity to induce downstream signal transduction in an ITAM-dependent manner, ultimately facilitating mast cell proliferation (Fig. 4g).
MCEMP1 deficiency diminishes airway inflammation in chronic asthma mouse model
Several studies have shown that MCEMP1 is one of the top inducible genes in inflammatory lung diseases including asthma2–4. Indeed, when C57BL/6 mice were sensitized with chicken egg ovalbumin (OVA) via intraperitoneal injection and subsequently challenged with the same antigen via intranasal administration, MCEMP1 expression was remarkably upregulated in the lung lesions, but not in the guts (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). To examine whether MCEMP1 deficiency impairs the immune response in chronic asthma model, 6–8 weeks old Mcemp1+/+ or Mcemp1–/– C57BL/6 mice were immunized via intraperitoneal injection of OVA on days 1, 4, and 7 (Fig. 5a). At 5 days after the third sensitization, mice were challenged with intranasal instillation of OVA weekly for a total of 8 weeks. Control mice received saline for both sensitization and challenge. Compared to saline-treated Mcemp1+/+ and Mcemp1–/– mice, OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice exhibited significant peribronchiolar and perivascular leukocyte infiltration and lung damage, which was considerably reduced in OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice (Fig. 5b). Strikingly, Mcemp1–/– mice showed lower percentages and numbers of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid than Mcemp1+/+ mice after being challenged with OVA (Fig. 5c). Moreover, the percentages and absolute numbers of infiltrated eosinophils and inflammatory monocytes, but not neutrophils, were considerably lower in the lungs of Mcemp1–/– mice than Mcemp1+/+ mice upon OVA challenge (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). In addition, Mcemp1–/– mice showed decreased levels of mast cells accumulation in the lungs compared to Mcemp1+/+ mice after being challenged with OVA (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 5c). In comparison to OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice, OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice also exhibited less collagen deposition in the lungs, indicating reduced lung fibrosis (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 5d). These findings indicate that MCEMP1 deficiency leads to the mitigation of OVA-induced chronic inflammatory responses, such as eosinophil and inflammatory monocyte infiltration, mast cell accumulation, as well as collagen deposition.
Furthermore, we performed mast cell engraftment into Mcemp1–/– mice for OVA-induced chronic lung inflammation. Bone marrow cells from Mcemp1+/+ mice were cultured with SCF and IL-3 for 4 weeks. 107 bone marrow-derived WT mast cells were intravenously injected into 10-week-old recipient mouse via the tail vein. At 12 weeks later, Mcemp1–/– recipients were subjected to OVA-induced chronic asthma model (Fig. 5g). Consistently, the percentages and absolute numbers of infiltrated eosinophils and inflammatory monocytes were considerably higher in the lungs of Mcemp1+/+ mice than Mcemp1–/– mice after being challenged with OVA (Fig. 5g and Supplementary Fig. 5e). However, adoptive transfer of WT mast cells into Mcemp1–/– mice led to the increase of OVA-induced infiltrates of leukocytes including eosinophils and neutrophils, and the decrease of percentages of alveolar macrophages compared to saline-treated Mcemp1+/+ mice or OVA-treated Mcemp1–/– mice (Fig. 5h and Supplementary Fig. 5e). These results indicate that MCEMP1 expression in mast cells is critical for the OVA-induced recruitment of leukocytes including eosinophils and neutrophils in chronic asthma model.
MCEMP1 deficiency alters gene expression related to lung inflammation and damage
Furthermore, we assessed multiple cytokines and growth factors in the BAL and plasma. Mcemp1–/– mice exhibited significantly lower levels of BAL concentrations of Th2-type cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5), chemokines and growth factors [CCL6, MIP-1γ (CCL9), KC-GRO (CXCL1), M-CSF-1, IP-10 (CXCL10), MIP-1β (CCL4)], airway remodeling-related molecules (MMP-9 and TIMP-1), and inflammatory substances (CRP, RAGE, VEGF-A, and VCAM-1) for airway obstruction and chronic vascular inflammation, compared to Mcemp1+/+ mice upon OVA challenge (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 6a). In addition, OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice showed lower concentrations of plasma IL-5, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 than OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice (Fig. 6b). However, Mcemp1+/+ and Mcemp1–/– mice showed similar amounts (100 to 150 pg/mL) of SCF in bronchoalveolar lavages, suggesting that the low proliferation of mast cells in Mcemp1–/– mice is not due to the low level of SCF but due to the lack of MCEMP1-mediated activation of KIT (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Collectively, these data indicate that MCEMP1 deficiency results in the reduction of proinflammatory cytokine-mediated airway inflammation.
We further analyzed the lung transcriptome of OVA-challenged mice by RNA sequencing. The number of DEGs in OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice compared to saline-treated Mcemp1+/+ mice was significantly higher than those in OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice compared to saline-treated Mcemp1–/– mice (Supplementary Fig. 6b). The extent of gene expression alteration between OVA-challenged versus saline-treated Mcemp1+/+ mice was much greater than that between OVA-challenged versus saline-treated Mcemp1–/– mice (Supplementary Fig. 6c). In addition, OVA challenge led to greater upregulation of genes related to Th2 pathway and lung damage in Mcemp1+/+ mice compared to Mcemp1–/– mice (Fig. 6c). Among the upregulated core DEGs in OVA-challenged versus saline-treated Mcemp1+/+ mice were genes encoding Th2-type cytokines and cytokine receptors (Il13, Il10, Ccl5, Ccr1, Ccl3, and Ccr5), interferon related genes (Ifng and Stat1), matrix metallopeptidase (Mmp12), and complement proteins (C3 and Cfb) (Fig. 6d). In contrast, the alteration of these gene expressions was markedly reduced in Mcemp1–/– mice (Fig. 6d). qRT-PCR analysis of lung tissues further showed that OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice had lower expression levels of Il13, Il5, Il10, Ccl2, Ccr5, and Cxcl10 compared to OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice (Fig. 6e). Taken together, these data indicate that MCEMP1 deficiency results in a global suppression of various lung-specific signaling pathways, with a particular impact on those related to airway inflammation and lung damage.
MCEMP1 deficiency alleviates lung function impairment in OVA-induced chronic asthma
We next examined lung function parameters of OVA-challenged mice, including lung stiffness and airway hyperreactivity, upon methacholine inhalation using Flexivent system. OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice exhibited significantly decreased compliance of respiratory system (Crs, ability of the lung to stretch) in response to increasing doses of methacholine, whereas OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice showed similar levels of Crs to saline-treated Mcemp1+/+ or Mcemp1–/– mice (Fig. 7a). OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice also showed increased elastance of respiratory system (Ers, an index of stiffness) and tissue elastance (H, alveoli stiffness) compared to OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice, indicating that Mcemp1–/– mouse lung was less remodeled and stiffer than Mcemp1+/+ mouse lung when intranasally challenged with OVA (Figs. 7b, c). On the other hand, OVA-challenge did not significantly increase the overall resistance of the respiratory system (Rrs), and central (Rn) and alveoli airway (G) in either Mcemp1+/+ mice or Mcemp1–/– mice (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b, c).
We further assessed functional lung impairments using X-ray velocimetric 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DMedical lung scanning) technology that allows the visualization of lung motion and quantification of time-resolved regional airflow. OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice exhibited sporadic distributions of increased or decreased regional ventilation the peak of inspiration as represented by the blue or the red area, respectively, whereas OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice displayed a relatively uniform regional ventilation (Fig. 7d). The ventilation frequency distribution histogram showed that OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice had a significantly higher ventilation deficit percent (VDP), defined as the percentage of ventilation less than 60% of the mean, compared to OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice, saline-treated Mcemp1+/+ mice, or saline-treated Mcemp1–/– mice (Figs. 7e, f). Consistently, the ventilation heterogeneity (VH) of OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice was higher than OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice regardless of the small or large region of airways (Fig. 7g and Supplementary Fig. 7d, e). Tidal volume, which is the total volume of air inhaled and exhaled in each breath, was significantly lower in OVA-challenged Mcemp1+/+ mice compared to OVA-challenged Mcemp1–/– mice (Fig. 7h). These results indicate that Mcemp1–/– mice have significantly weaker functional ventilation defect phenotypes than Mcemp1+/+ mice following OVA challenge. Overall, Flexivent lung functional examinations and 4DMedical imaging results indicate that MCEMP1 deficiency leads to reduced lung inflammation and improved lung function in OVA-induced chronic asthma model.
Discussion
Our study implicates the critical function of MCEMP1 as an adaptor for the KIT receptor in promoting SCF-mediated mast cell proliferation, which in turn contributes to chronic airway inflammation. The crystal structure of KIT has alluded that the intracellular domain of KIT features a high-order regulation of its kinase activity through multiple post-translational modifications and conformational changes31,32. For instance, the JM domain of KIT excerts an autoinhibitory function by interacting with the kinase domains and suppressing its kinase activity32. Upon SCF-mediated KIT activation, two tyrosine residues in the JM domain of KIT undergo phosphorylation that releases its autoinhibitory configuration, allowing the two kinase domains to adopt a conformation for active catalytic function32. We found that the deletion of JM and KD1 regions of KIT led to a loss of binding to MCEMP1, suggesting that MCEMP1 may interact with either the JM or KD1 domain of KIT and interfere with its autoinhibitory configuration and keeps the kinase domain of KIT in an active form. Human MCEMP1 shares 44% amino acid sequence identity with mouse MCEMP1 ortholog. A cross-species interaction study demonstrated that human MCEMP1 interacts with mouse KIT receptor, suggesting the presence of an evolutionarily conserved motif or similar secondary structure within the intracellular domain of MCEMP1 that is essential for KIT binding. Further investigation is required to validate this hypothesis and elucidate the molecular mechanism of MCEMP1-KIT interaction in KIT activation.
Moreover, our study demonstrates that MCEMP1 is critical for optimal proliferation of primary mast cell populations in the peritoneum, but not in bone marrow. Our in vitro study indicates that MCEMP1 is critical for SCF/KIT-mediated mast cell proliferation, indicating that MCEMP1 may primarily be responsible for SCF-dependent signaling, rather than IL-3-dependent signaling, for mast cell growth. This is further supported by our in vivo study demonstrating impaired lung mast cell expansion in Mcemp1-deficient mice upon intranasal SCF challenge. Overall, our study elucidates a regulatory mechanism that accounts for KIT-mediated mast cell proliferation.
We have also evaluated the pathological immune responses in the airways of Mcemp1–/– mice after sensitization and challenge to OVA. We developed a chronic asthma mouse model in Mcemp1–/– mice of the C57BL/6 strain, based on previous studies that utilized C57BL/6-KitW-sh mast cell-deficient mice to demonstrate the critical role of mast cells in the OVA-induced chronic asthma model36,49. MCEMP1 deficiency resulted in significantly lower levels of inflammatory cytokines, decreased numbers of eosinophils and mast cells, and less deposition of fibrotic collagen in the lung. We employed Flexivent to measure airway responsiveness in response to methacholine and 4DMedical lung scanning to assess respiratory mechanics. Combination of these advanced technologies enabled us to analyze various lung parameters and draw phenotypical consequences of MCEMP1 deficiency. Compared to Mcemp1+/+ mice, Mcemp1–/– mice developed less affected lung functions, including lung compliance, elastance, ventilation heterogeneity, ventilation deficit percent, and tidal volume. Mechanistically, our in vivo study indicates that MCEMP1 promotes the expansion of mast cells, which contributes to severe lung inflammation in asthma. RNA-seq analysis of lung tissues showed that Mcemp1–/– mice exhibited downregulation of gene expressions related to lung damage in comparison to Mcemp1+/+ mice, supporting the notion that MCEMP1 is a crucial factor that mediates immune responses and airway inflammation in the development of chronic asthma.
Mast cells originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow. Immature progenitor cells that circulate in the blood migrate to the periphery, where they further differentiate into mature mast cells50–52. Tissue-resident mast cells exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity (maturity, granule formation, and varied mast cell mediators) and considerable plasticity that are influenced by microenvironmental factors such as cytokines, growth factors, and microbiome13,27,28,53,54. Further investigation of lung mast cell phenotypes from Mcemp1–/– mice in chronic asthma model is required to examine whether Mcemp1–/– mice have defects in the development of distinct mast cell subtype clusters, induction of specific gene sets or pathways that contribute to asthma exacerbation in comparison with Mcemp1+/+ mice upon OVA challenge. It is important to include different mouse strains in further studies as the genetic background can have an impact on the functional properties of mast cells. MCEMP1 and KIT are also expressed in other immune cells including dendritic cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells and KIT signaling is also involved in mast cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, and migration. Thus, further studies are required to gain a better understanding of the role and mechanism of action of MCEMP1 in other aspects of mast cell biology, tissue-specific mast cells, additional immune cells, its potential ligand(s), and protein kinases responsible for MCEMP1 phosphorylation.
Therapeutic interventions aimed at modulating mast cell functions can be achieved by various approaches, including reducing the mast cell population, inhibiting mast cell activation, intervening intracellular signal transduction, and blocking the effects of mast cell mediators12. A comprehensive understanding of the signaling pathways and mechanisms that contribute to mast cell hyper-proliferation or hyperplasia in human tissue is necessary for the development of targeted therapies aimed at regulating mast cell numbers. Reducing mast cell numbers is a promising treatment strategy for clonal mast cell disorders such as mastocytosis and allergic lung diseases, which are characterized by abnormally elevated mast cell populations. The SCF-mediated KIT receptor signaling is considered as a critical factor for mast cell hyperplasia in physiological and pathological conditions. Given that MCEMP1 expression is highly upregulated in allergic and inflammatory lung diseases2–4 and that MCEMP1 regulates SCF/KIT-mediated mast cell proliferation, the development of MCEMP1 inhibitors holds significant potential for the treatment of lung inflammatory diseases. In summary, this study advances our understanding of the MCEMP1-mediated regulation of KIT receptor for mast cell proliferation and asthma development, and further offer molecular insights into the development of new therapies for allergic and inflammatory lung diseases.
Methods
All experiments were reviewed and approved by Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) and Institutional Animal Care and Use committees (IACUC) at USC and Cleveland Clinic.
Cell culture
293T, Raw264.7, HMC-1 cells were purchased from ATCC. C57 and DC2.4 cells were kindly provided by S.J. Galli and K.L. Rock, respectively. 293T and RAW264.7 cell lines were grown in DMEM (Gibco, 11965-092) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, 26140-079), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (1% Pen/Strep, Gibco, 15140-163). C57 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco, 35050-061), and 55 μM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME, Gibco, 21985-023). HMC-1 cells were culture in RPMI-1640 (Gibco, 11875-093) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, and 55 μM β-ME. DC2.4 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1× non-essential amino acids (Gibco, 11140-050), 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 (Gibco, 15630-080), and 55 μM β-ME. All cells were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Plasmids
All constructs for transient and stable expression in mammalian cells include pEF-MCS-IRES-puro (modified), pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-puro (System Biosciences, CD510B-1), pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-Hygro (System Biosciences, CD515B-1), and pLKO.1-TRC (Addgene, 10878) vectors. All human and mouse MCEMP1 expression plasmids contain a carboxy-terminal Flag epitope and all human and mouse KIT expression plasmids contain a carboxy-terminal HA or V5 epitope. All constructs were constructed by standard PCR cloning strategy or Gibson assembly method.
Co-immunoprecipitation and GST-pulldown
293T cells were transfected with the indicated DNA plasmids using polyethylenimine transfection (Polysciences, 23966). Cells were collected 48 h post-transfection, washed by DPBS pH 7.5 (Gibco, 14190-144), and resuspended in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (Invitrogen, 15568-025), 150 mM NaCl (Sigma, 31434), 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma, T9284), supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 48047900). After sonication or freeze/thaw cycles, whole-cell lysates (WCL) were rotating at 4 °C for 1 h and centrifuged for 10 min at 16,000 × g. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.45 μm polyethersulfone filter. For Co-immunoprecipitation, WCL were incubated with M2 beads (Sigma, F2426) or HA beads (Sigma, E6779) at 4 °C for 1-2 h. For GST-pulldown, WCL were incubated with glutathione-conjugated sepharose beads (GE, GE17-0756-01) at 4 °C for 1 h. The immobilized M2 immune complexes or GST complexes containing beads were washed five times using 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer containing 150~400 mM NaCl. Beads were eluted in 2×Laemmli dye (Sigma, S3401) by heating at 95 °C for 5 min and subjected to immunoblotting.
Immunoblotting
Antibodies included MCEMP1 (polyclonal rabbit made by GST-mouse MCEMP1-ectodomain fusion protein), Phospho-KIT (Cell Signaling, 3391S), KIT (Cell Signaling, 3074S), SOS1 (Cell Signaling, 12409S), Grb2 (Santa Cruz, C-23), 4G10 (EMD Millipore, 05-321), 4G10-HRP (EMD Millipore, 16-105), P-Tyr-1000 (Cell Signaling, 8952S), Phospho-IκBα (Cell Signaling, 9241S), IκBα (Cell Signaling, 4814S), Phospho-MEK1/2 (Cell Signaling, 9154S), MEK1/2 (Cell Signaling, 9122S), Phospho-p38 (Cell Signaling, 9211S), p38 (Cell Signaling, 9212S), Phospho-JNK (Cell Signaling, 9251S), JNK (Cell Signaling, 4668S), Phospho-ERK (Cell Signaling, 4370S), ERK (Cell Signaling, 4695S or 9101S), GST (Santa Cruz, B-14), Actin (Santa Cruz, C4), Tubulin (Santa Cruz, B7), rabbit-Flag (Sigma, F7425), mouse-Flag (Sigma, F1804, M2), rabbit-HA (Covance, PRB-101P and BioLegend 902302), mouse-HA (BioLegend 901503, 16B12), mouse Flag-HRP (Abcam ab49763, M2), mouse HA-HRP (BioLegend 901519, 16B12), mouse V5-HRP (Thermo R961-25), mouse IgG-HRP (Cell Signaling, 7076), and rabbit IgG-HRP (Cell Signaling, 7074). Information on antibodies for immunoblotting is presented in Supplementary Table 2.
Flag antibody stimulation
Cells (5 × 106) were washed once with serum free DMEM, resuspended in 25 μl serum free DMEM, pre-incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. 25 μl of cells were incubated with 25 μl of monoclonal mouse anti-Flag antibody (1 μg) for 1~5 min at 37 °C. Cells were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 1 min at 4 °C and rapidly frozen by a dry ice/ethanol or liquid nitrogen. Cells were lysed with 1 ml of 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche 04906 837001), and 2 mM Na3VO4 (tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, NEB P0758L). WCL were immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. To detect the phosphorylated MCEMP1, WCL were incubated with rabbit anti-Flag antibody at 4 °C for 3–12 h, followed by incubation with protein A/G agarose beads (Thermo Fisher, 20422) at 4 °C for 3 h. The immobilized immune complexes were washed five times with 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer containing 150 to 300 mM NaCl. Beads were eluted in 2×Laemmli dye by heating at 95 °C for 5 min and subjected to immunoblotting with 4G10 antibody. To perform a qRT-PCR, cells (106) were incubated with 1 μg/ml anti-Flag antibody for 6–8 h at 37 °C.
qRT-PCR
500 ng to 1 μg total RNA was extracted using TRI reagent (Sigma, T9424) or RNeasy kit (Qiagen, 74104 or 74004), digested with DNase I (Sigma, AMPD1), and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, 1708891). cDNAs were quantified using iQ SYBR Green Supermix kit (Bio-Rad, 1725271) and a CFX96 thermocycler (Bio-Rad). Gene-specific probes for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Calcium mobilization assay
Cells (2 × 106) were loaded with calcium indicator (BD, 640176) in 200 μl of complete RPMI-1640 medium for 30 min at 37 °C, washed once, resuspended in 1 ml of the medium, and put on ice until analyzed. Baseline calcium level was established for 1 min prior to addition of stimuli. Cells were stimulated with 1 μg/ml anti-Flag antibody or 2 μM calcium Ionophore A23187 (Sigma, C7522), then intracellular calcium level was monitored by flow cytometry analysis.
Degranulation assay
Cells (106) were preloaded with 100 ng/ml anti-2,4,dinitrophenyl antibody (α-DNP IgE, Clone SPE-7, Sigma, D8406) at 37 °C for 18 h. Cells were washed twice and resuspended in 250 μl of Tyrode’s buffer pH 7.4 containing 10 mM HEPES, 129 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.4 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5.6 mM Glucose, 0.1% BSA. 10 μl of cells were incubated with 10 μl of 2,4,dinitrophenyl -BSA (DNP-BSA, 2-200 ng/ml, Invitrogen, A23018), anti-Flag antibody (1 μg/ml, Sigma, F7425), anti-V5 antibody (1 μg/ml, Invitrogen, 46-1157), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 50 ng/ml, Sigma, P8139) plus calcium ionophore A23187 (10 μM) in 96-well V-bottom plate at 37 °C for 1 h without CO2. Cells were centrifuged at 500 × g for 3 min and supernatant (10 μl) was transferred to a new 96-well flat-bottom plate. Cell pellets were lysed with 40 μl of 1% Triton X-100 in Tyrode’s buffer. After centrifugation at 500 × g for 3 min to remove debris, cell lysate (10 μl) was transferred to the 96-well flat-bottom plate. The substrate 4-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide (p-NAG, 4 mM, Sigma, N9376) was prepared in a substrate buffer pH 4.5 containing 50.3 mM Na2HPO4 (Sigma, S7907) and 109.4 mM citric acid (Sigma, 251275). The 10 μl of supernatant and cell lysate were incubated with 40 μl of p-NAG at 37 °C for 90 min without CO2. Reactions were stopped with 150 μl of 0.2 M glycine pH 10.7 (Bio-Rad, 1610724) and read at 405 nm using Filtermax F5 plate reader (Molecular Devices).
TKX1 expression system and mass spectrometry
GST fusion proteins were purified from E. coli strain TKX1, which contains a mammalian elk tyrosine kinase expression vector (Agilent, 200124) as previously described55. Briefly, the TKX1 strain was transformed with a pGEX6p-1 plasmids expressing 5’GST-tagged human wild-type MCEMP1 or mutant MCEMP1 amino-terminal intracellular domain. The phosphorylated MCEMP1 proteins were purified by GST-pulldown. HMC-1 human mast cell lysates were incubated with the glutathione beads containing GST fusion proteins in a binding buffer containing 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 (Sigma, 74385), and protease inhibitors at 4 °C for 2 h. Glutathione beads were then washed four times with binding buffer, and the proteins associated with the beads were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subjected to silver staining. Protein bands were excised and sent to Taplin Biological Mass Spectrometry Facility at Harvard Medical School (HMS) for protein identification.
SCF purification for in vivo study
pCMV3-sp-HA-mKITLG plasmid (Sino Biological) was used to construct pET21b-mouse-SCF vector. The construct was transformed and expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) RIPL strain (Agilent, 230280). Cells were grown in LB broth (Invitrogen, 12780-052) containing ampicillin (Sigma, A9518) and chloramphenicol (Sigma, C0378) at 37 °C until OD600 reached 0.8 and the protein expression was induced with 1 mM Isopropyl β-d−1-thiogalactoside (GoldBio, 367-93-1) at 37 °C for 4 h. Bacteria were lysed in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.01 mM EDTA pH 8.0 (Invitrogen, 15575-038), and 1 mM DL-Dithiothreitol (DTT; GoldBio, DTT100). After sonication, cell lysates were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Inclusion body pellet was washed three times with lysis buffer (wash buffer I), and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Inclusion body pellet was washed again with wash buffer II containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.01 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT to remove Triton X-100, and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Inclusion body pellet was solubilized in a dissolving buffer containing 8 M urea (Sigma, U5378), 50 mM sodium acetate pH 6.0 (Sigma, S2889), 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT. The solubilized SCF was slowly injected into the vortex of stirring refolding buffer containing 2.5 M urea, 0.01 mM EDTA, 5 mM sodium acetate, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 0.5 mM oxidized glutathione (Sigma, G4501), 5 mM reduced glutathione (Sigma, G4251), and 0.2 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (Sigma, 78830) by slowly dripping from 21 G needle at 4 °C. After 40 h, the refolding mixture was dialyzed in a dialysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 150 mM NaCl. The dialyzed solution was subjected to 30% followed by 70% ammonium sulfate (Sigma, A4418) precipitation to remove misfolded aggregates and enrich for properly folded proteins. The 70% precipitates were resolubilized in 1 X HEPES buffered saline (HBS) and purified by HisPur cobalt resin (Thermo Fisher, 89965) and size exclusion chromatography with a Superdex-200 column (GE, 28990945) using HBS buffer. For in vivo experiment, endotoxin was removed using Triton X-114 (Sigma, X114) and endotoxin removal was confirmed using the ToxinSensor Chromogenic LAL Endotoxin Assay Kit (Genscript, L00350C).
Mice
Mcemp1–/– mice (C57BL/6) were generated by CRISPR-Cas9 system. For production of sgRNA, bicistronic vector expressing Cas9 and sgRNA were digested with BsmBI and the linearized vector was gel purified56. MCEMP1-targeting guide RNA sequence (Mcemp1-RGEN) was kindly provided by J.-S. Kim57. A pair of oligos for target exon 1 of mouse Mcemp1 was annealed, phosphorylated, and ligated into linearized vector. T7 promoter was then added to the sgRNA template by PCR amplification. Gel-purified T7-sgRNA PCR product was used as a template for in vitro transcription using MEGAshortscript T7 Transcription kit (Life Technologies, AM1354), subsequently purified by MEGAclear kit (Life Technologies, AM1908) and eluted in RNase-free water. Microinjection of the oligos was performed by the University of Southern California (USC) transgenic/knockout rodent core facility. Briefly, Cas9 mRNA (TriLink, L-6129) and sgRNA were mixed and injected into pronuclei-stage zygotes obtained from the embryo donor C57BL/6 female mice. The injected zygotes were transferred into the uterus of pseudopregnant B6D2F1 (C57BL/6 X DBA2) foster female mice. For genotyping of pups, genomic DNA was extracted from the tail and the sgRNA target site was PCR amplified using the following primers (Forward: 5’-TGAGATTTCCCCATCTATCTGA-3’; Reverse: 5’- CTCACCTTGTTTTGTGGGTGT-3’). The PCR products were then subjected to T7 endonuclease I assay (NEB, M0302L) and Sanger sequencing. All mice were bred and housed in specific pathogen-free facilities maintained by the USC Animal Research Center at Keck Medical School and Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute. All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use committees (IACUC) at USC and Cleveland Clinic.
Primary mast cell and macrophage isolation
Peritoneal cells (PC) were isolated using a buffer containing HBSS (Gibco, 14175-095), 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, and 3% FBS. Bone marrow cells (BM) were isolated from femur and tibia using RPMI-1640. PC and BM were grown in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, 2mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher, 11360-070), 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 55 μM β-ME, 30 ng/ml SCF (Peprotech, 250-03) and/or 30 ng/ml IL-3 (Peprotech, 213-13). On Day 4, 7, 13, 16, 19, the fresh media was added. MACS column magnetic separation was performed to isolate CD117(KIT)-positive cells using CD117 MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-091-224) and MACS buffer containing DPBS, 0.5% BSA, and 2 mM EDTA. Counting cell number was performed using Countess 2 (Thermo Fisher) automated cell counter. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were isolated and cultured as previously described58. Briefly, Bone marrow cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (PeproTec, 300-25), 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate.
Immunofluorescence staining
Primary PC were mounted onto cytoslide using Cytopin 4 (Thermo Fisher). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Thermo, 28908) for 10 min, washed with DPBS, permeabilized with a buffer containing DPBS and 0.1% Triton X-100, washed three times with a PBST washing buffer containing DPBS and 0.01% Tween 20 (Amresco, 0777), and subjected to blocking with a buffer containing PBST, 10% goat serum and 1% BSA for 1 h at 25 °C. After blocking, the cytoslide was incubated with a primary antibody [Phospho-JNK (Cell Signaling, 9255 S) or Phospho-MITF (Millipore Sigma, SAB4503940)] in a buffer containing PBST and 0.1% BSA for 18 h at 4 °C, washed three times with PBST, incubated with a secondary antibody [Alexa Fluor-488 Goat-anti-Rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, A11008) or Alexa Fluor-568 Goat-anti-Rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, A11011)] and Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen, H3570) in a buffer containing PBST and 0.1% BSA for 1 h at 25 °C, and washed three times with PBST. After drying, the cytoslide was covered by coverslips with Flouromount-G mounting medium (SouthernBiotech, 0100-01) and stored at 4 °C for 18 h. Images were captured using a BZ-X710 series microscope (Keyence). Information on antibodies for immunofluorescence is presented in Supplementary Table 4.
SCF intranasal challenge
12-week-old age- and sex-matched Mcemp1+/+ and Mcemp1–/– mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine HCl (Zoetis, NDC 54771-2013-1) and 10 mg/kg xylazine (PIVETAL, NDC 46066-750-02), and intranasally (i.n.) administered with 1 mg/kg SCF or 0.9% saline in 30–50 μl on days 1, 4, and 8. At 24 h after the last challenge, lungs were isolated for flow cytometry analysis.
Ovalbumin (OVA)-induced chronic asthma model
This animal model has been previously described34. Briefly, 6–8-week-old age- and sex-matched Mcemp1+/+ and Mcemp1–/– mice were i.p. immunized with 50 μg OVA (Worthington, LS003054) in 100 μl saline on days 1, 4, and 7. Starting on day 12, mice were i.p. anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine HCl and 10 mg/kg xylazine, and i.n. challenged with 20 μg OVA in 30-50 μl saline weekly for a total of 8 weeks. Control mice received 0.9 % saline alone for i.p. injections and i.n. instillations. At 24 h after the last challenge, lung imaging was acquired using 4Dx scanner (4DMedical). Airway responses to aerosolized methacholine were measured using Flexivent system (SCIREQ)59. Mice were sacrificed and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was recovered by 700 μl of saline with 5% FBS and examined for cell numbers and types. BAL cells were counted in hematocytometer and differential leukocyte counts were performed visually in Eosin Y/Methylene Blue-stained cytospin preparations. Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture. BAL fluid (85 μl) and plasma (50 μl) were subjected to mouse MAP 4.1 Luminex platform multiplex analysis (Ampersand biosciences). The lung was perfused and isolated for histology, flow cytometry analysis, and RNA sequencing.
Mast cell engraftment
Bone marrow cells from Mcemp1+/+ mice were culture with 30 ng/ml SCF and 30 ng/ml IL-3 for 4 weeks to generate cell populations that contained more than 95% immature mast cells. 107 bone marrow-derived mast cells were intravenously injected into 10-week-old recipient mouse via the tail vein. At 12 weeks later, recipients were subjected to OVA-induced chronic asthma model.
4DMedical Imaging
The NHD Preclinical Scanner is an X-ray device, optimized for performing 4D CT of mouse lungs, which in conjunction with 4DMedical data processing delivers regional measurements of lung function. Each mouse was i.p. anesthetized with 100 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium (SAGENT Pharmaceuticals, NDC 25021-676-20) and after tracheotomy the trachea was cannulated using a 20ga ½ Luer Stub (Insteach Laboratories). The mouse was placed in an animal holder that was connected to the ventilator. A typical 4D CT scan took around 3-4 min and 4–10 scans/mouse were collected.
Flexivent measurement of airway reactivity
Mice were i.p. anesthetized with 100 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium, tracheostomized, placed on a rodent ventilator flexivent (SCIREQ) set at a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg and at a rate of 200 breaths per min, and i.p. administered with 1 mg/kg with pancuronium bromide (Sigma, P1918-50MG). Mice were given a total of 2–4 serially increasing doses of methacholine (2.5–100 mg/ml, Sigma, A2251-100G) via a small volume nebulizer connected to the tracheostomy tube and ventilator. After each dose, the change in lung resistance was recorded on a computer.
Histology
Tissues were fixed in 10% formaldehyde (Sigma, HT501128) and embedded in paraffin. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with MCEMP1 antibody (1:500 dilution) and counterstained with hematoxylin. For immunofluorescence staining, tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected by 30% sucrose (JT Baker, 4072-05) in PBS until tissue sank, and cryopreserved in Tissue Freezing Medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 72592). Immunofluorescence staining was performed with MCEMP1 antibody (1:1000 dilution) and Alexa Fluor-568 Goat-anti-Rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, A11011). Mast cells were stained by 0.5% Toluidine blue and counterstain by 0.01% eosin. Number of toluidine blue positive cells was counted by Image J. Images were captured using a BZ-X710 series microscope (Keyence). Paraffin embedding, sectioning (7 μm), hematoxylin-eosin staining, Luna’s Toluidine blue staining, and Masson’s Trichrome staining were performed by the USC Immunohistochemistry Core facility and the Cleveland Clinic Imaging Histology Core facility.
Flow cytometry
Surface staining of lung cells was performed with CD45-APC-Cy7 (BD, 557659), KIT-PE (BD, 553355), FcεRI-Alexa488 (BioLegend, 134330), Mouse Lineage Cocktail-APC (BD, 558074), Ly-6G-APC (BioLegend, 127614), Ly-6C-BV650 (BioLegend, 128049), CD11b-Alexa488 (BD, 557672). CD11c-BV421 (BD, 562782), Siglec-F-PE (BD, 552126), and CD16/CD32 (BD, 553142) antibodies. Blue Dead Cell Stain (Thermo Fisher, L34962) was used for fixable live/dead staining as per manufacturer instructions. Information on antibodies for flow cytometry is provided in Supplementary Table 5. FACS buffer contains DPBS, 5% FBS, and 0.02% sodium azide. Brilliant stain buffer plus (BD Biosciences, 566385) was added when using two or more BD Horizon Brilliant antibodies. Lungs were mechanically dispersed using scissors and enzymatically digested using 1 ml of 1.67 mg/ml collagenase IV (Worthington, LS004210) plus 10 μl of 10 mg/ml DNase Type IV (Sigma, D5025) per lobe for 1 h at 37 °C with shaking. After filtering through 40 μm strainer and RBC lysis (BioLegend, 420301), cells were incubated with Fc block in 50 μl FACS buffer for 10 min at 4 °C, then incubated with antibody cocktail of interest in total 100 μl FACS buffer for 30 min at 4 °C, washed with FACS buffer, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at 4 °C. CountBright absolute counting beads (Thermo Fisher, C36950) were used for calculating absolute cell numbers. UltraComp eBeads Plus compensation beads (Thermo Fisher, 01-3333-42) were used for compensation or unmixing. FACS acquisition was performed on BD FACS Celesta (BD Biosciences) and Sony ID7000 (Sony). Sony ID7000 acquisition was performed by the Cleveland Clinic LRI FlowCore. All flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo v10.0 software.
RNA-seq
The lung was lysed using TissueLyser II (Qiagen) for 30 frequency/s and 30 s. RNA from PCMC and lung was extracted using RNeasy kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop and processed into RNA sequencing libraries with the KAPA mRNA Hyperprep kit (Roche, 08098123702). Library quality control was tested using an Agilent TapeStation 4200 and sequencing was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 500 (PCMC) or NovaSeq 6000 (lung). Sequencing was handled by the University of Southern California Molecular Genomics Core and the Cleveland Clinic Genomics Core. Subsequent demultiplexed fastq files were analyzed with Partek Flow software, v10.0. Further analysis was performed using R (Core Team, 2014) and figures were produced with the ggplot2 package (Wickham, 2009). Pathway analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (QIAGEN, version 01-20-04).
Statistics and reproducibility
All experiments were independently repeated at least twice with similar results. Results are presented as mean±s.e.m., violin plot with lines at median and quartiles, or min to max of box and whiskers. For data analysis, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s or Sidak’s multiple comparisons; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test for two-component comparisons determined by GraphPad Prism 9.0. For RNA seq data analysis, right-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test determined by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis version 01-20-04; p-values in volcano plots determined by Gene Specific Analysis in Partek Flow software, v10.0.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. S.J. Galli (Stanford) and K.L. Rock (University of Massachusetts Medical School) J.-S. Kim (Seoul national university) for reagents and protocols. We thank Dr. S. Erzurum (Cleveland Clinic) for advisory support. This work was partly supported by National Institutes of Health grants K99HL153688 (Y.J.C.); CA200422, CA251275, AI140718, AI140705, AI152190, DE023926, DE027888, DE028521, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Initiative Program KGM9942012 and Betsy B. deWindt (J.U.J.). This work utilized a Sony ID7000 purchased with funding from the National Institutes of Health SIFAR grant S10OD025207 (K.A.). The work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL103453, HL081064, and HL109250 (K.A.).
Source data
Author contributions
Y.J.C., J.-S.Y., and J.U.J. designed the experiments, analyzed the data, interpreted the results, and wrote the manuscript. K.J. analyzed transcriptomic data. L.R., D.K., V.Z., M.F., E.M., U.Y.C., S.-S.F., Y.C., Z.J., H.J., M.-J.K., S.K., B.H., S.A.-B.-O., H.M. performed the experiments. G.J.S., S.K., S,-A.L., O.A., K.A. contributed to data interpretation and discussion.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code GSE197042 Subseries, GSE197040 (lung) and GSE197041 (PCMC). All other data are available in the article and its Supplementary files or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Youn Jung Choi, Ji-Seung Yoo.
Contributor Information
Youn Jung Choi, Email: CHOIY4@ccf.org.
Jae U. Jung, Email: JUNGJ@ccf.org
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-37873-3.
References
- 1.Li K, et al. Identification and expression of a new type II transmembrane protein in human mast cells. Genomics. 2005;86:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Subrata LS, et al. Interactions between innate antiviral and atopic immunoinflammatory pathways precipitate and sustain asthma exacerbations in children. J. Immunol. 2009;183:2793–2800. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Su MW, et al. Childhood asthma clusters reveal neutrophil-predominant phenotype with distinct gene expression. Allergy. 2018;73:2024–2032. doi: 10.1111/all.13439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rastogi D, et al. CDC42-related genes are upregulated in helper T cells from obese asthmatic children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;141:539–548.e537. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Herazo-Maya JD, et al. Validation of a 52-gene risk profile for outcome prediction in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an international, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017;5:857–868. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30349-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Herazo-Maya JD, et al. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene expression profiles predict poor outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:205ra136. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zeng D, et al. Tumor microenvironment evaluation promotes precise checkpoint immunotherapy of advanced gastric cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2021;9:e002467. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen JX, Xu X, Zhang S. Silence of long noncoding RNA NEAT1 exerts suppressive effects on immunity during sepsis by promoting microRNA-125-dependent MCEMP1 downregulation. IUBMB Life. 2019;71:956–968. doi: 10.1002/iub.2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jian R, Yang M, Xu F. Lentiviral-mediated silencing of mast cell-expressed membrane protein 1 promotes angiogenesis of rats with cerebral ischemic stroke. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:16786–16797. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raman K, et al. Peripheral Blood MCEMP1 Gene Expression as a Biomarker for. Stroke Prognosis. Stroke. 2016;47:652–658. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wood H. Stroke: MCEMP1-a new prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for stroke? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2016;12:127. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Siebenhaar F, Redegeld FA, Bischoff SC, Gibbs BF, Maurer M. Mast Cells as Drivers of Disease and Therapeutic Targets. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dwyer DF, Barrett NA, Austen KF, Immunological Genome Project C. Expression profiling of constitutive mast cells reveals a unique identity within the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:878–887. doi: 10.1038/ni.3445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hepworth MR, et al. Mast cells orchestrate type 2 immunity to helminths through regulation of tissue-derived cytokines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2012;109:6644–6649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112268109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Knight PA, Wright SH, Lawrence CE, Paterson YY, Miller HR. Delayed expulsion of the nematode Trichinella spiralis in mice lacking the mucosal mast cell-specific granule chymase, mouse mast cell protease-1. J. Exp. Med. 2000;192:1849–1856. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.12.1849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Metz M, et al. Mast cells can enhance resistance to snake and honeybee venoms. Science. 2006;313:526–530. doi: 10.1126/science.1128877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schneider LA, Schlenner SM, Feyerabend TB, Wunderlin M, Rodewald HR. Molecular mechanism of mast cell mediated innate defense against endothelin and snake venom sarafotoxin. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204:2629–2639. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Akahoshi M, et al. Mast cell chymase reduces the toxicity of Gila monster venom, scorpion venom, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:4180–4191. doi: 10.1172/JCI46139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Maurer M, et al. Mast cells promote homeostasis by limiting endothelin-1-induced toxicity. Nature. 2004;432:512–516. doi: 10.1038/nature03085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Piliponsky AM, et al. Neurotensin increases mortality and mast cells reduce neurotensin levels in a mouse model of sepsis. Nat. Med. 2008;14:392–398. doi: 10.1038/nm1738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Galli SJ, Tsai M. IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat. Med. 2012;18:693–704. doi: 10.1038/nm.2755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Theoharides TC, Valent P, Akin C. Mast Cells, Mastocytosis, and Related Disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:1885–1886. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1409760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Varricchi G, Marone G, Kovanen PT. Cardiac Mast Cells: Underappreciated Immune Cells in Cardiovascular Homeostasis and Disease. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:734–746. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Serhan N, et al. House dust mites activate nociceptor-mast cell clusters to drive type 2 skin inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:1435–1443. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0493-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilfillan AM, Tkaczyk C. Integrated signalling pathways for mast-cell activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006;6:218–230. doi: 10.1038/nri1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wernersson S, Pejler G. Mast cell secretory granules: armed for battle. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:478–494. doi: 10.1038/nri3690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boyce JA. The role of mast cells in asthma. Prostaglandins Leukot. Ess. Fat. Acids. 2003;69:195–205. doi: 10.1016/S0952-3278(03)00081-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Galli SJ, et al. Mast cells as “tunable” effector and immunoregulatory cells: recent advances. Annu Rev. Immunol. 2005;23:749–786. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lennartsson J, Ronnstrand L. Stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit: from basic science to clinical implications. Physiol. Rev. 2012;92:1619–1649. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00046.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yuzawa S, et al. Structural basis for activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT by stem cell factor. Cell. 2007;130:323–334. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mol CD, et al. Structure of a c-kit product complex reveals the basis for kinase transactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:31461–31464. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300186200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mol CD, et al. Structural basis for the autoinhibition and STI-571 inhibition of c-Kit tyrosine kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:31655–31663. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403319200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reshetnyak AV, et al. The strength and cooperativity of KIT ectodomain contacts determine normal ligand-dependent stimulation or oncogenic activation in cancer. Mol. Cell. 2015;57:191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ho CCM, et al. Decoupling the Functional Pleiotropy of Stem Cell Factor by Tuning c-Kit Signaling. Cell. 2017;168:1041–1052.e1018. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Williams CM, Galli SJ. Mast cells can amplify airway reactivity and features of chronic inflammation in an asthma model in mice. J. Exp. Med. 2000;192:455–462. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.3.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yu M, et al. Mast cells can promote the development of multiple features of chronic asthma in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116:1633–1641. doi: 10.1172/JCI25702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gajiwala KS, et al. KIT kinase mutants show unique mechanisms of drug resistance to imatinib and sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2009;106:1542–1547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812413106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pittoni P, Piconese S, Tripodo C, Colombo MP. Tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic roles of c-Kit: mast cells as the primary off-target of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene. 2011;30:757–769. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Castells M, Akin C. Finding the right KIT inhibitor for advanced systemic mastocytosis. Nat. Med. 2021;27:2081–2082. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01588-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pardanani A, Tefferi A. Imatinib targets other than bcr/abl and their clinical relevance in myeloid disorders. Blood. 2004;104:1931–1939. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cahill KN, et al. KIT Inhibition by Imatinib in Patients with Severe Refractory Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1911–1920. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brightling CE, et al. Mast-cell infiltration of airway smooth muscle in asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:1699–1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bingham CO, 3rd, Austen KF. Mast-cell responses in the development of asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2000;105:S527–S534. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90056-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tabula Muris C, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature. 2018;562:367–372. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lee YN, et al. KIT signaling regulates MITF expression through miRNAs in normal and malignant mast cell proliferation. Blood. 2011;117:3629–3640. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-293548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Phung B, Sun J, Schepsky A, Steingrimsson E, Ronnstrand L. C-KIT signaling depends on microphthalmia-associated transcription factor for effects on cell proliferation. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gu Y, et al. Rac2, a hematopoiesis-specific Rho GTPase, specifically regulates mast cell protease gene expression in bone marrow-derived mast cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;22:7645–7657. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.21.7645-7657.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Timokhina I, Kissel H, Stella G, Besmer P. Kit signaling through PI 3-kinase and Src kinase pathways: an essential role for Rac1 and JNK activation in mast cell proliferation. EMBO J. 1998;17:6250–6262. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.21.6250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hernandez JD, Yu M, Sibilano R, Tsai M, Galli SJ. Development of multiple features of antigen-induced asthma pathology in a new strain of mast cell deficient BALB/c-Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice. Lab Invest. 2020;100:516–526. doi: 10.1038/s41374-019-0354-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Humbles AA, et al. The murine CCR3 receptor regulates both the role of eosinophils and mast cells in allergen-induced airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2002;99:1479–1484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.261462598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Abonia JP, et al. Alpha-4 integrins and VCAM-1, but not MAdCAM-1, are essential for recruitment of mast cell progenitors to the inflamed lung. Blood. 2006;108:1588–1594. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-012781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hallgren J, et al. Pulmonary CXCR2 regulates VCAM-1 and antigen-induced recruitment of mast cell progenitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2007;104:20478–20483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709651104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Qi X, et al. Antagonistic regulation by the transcription factors C/EBPalpha and MITF specifies basophil and mast cell fates. Immunity. 2013;39:97–110. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cildir G, Pant H, Lopez AF, Tergaonkar V. The transcriptional program, functional heterogeneity, and clinical targeting of mast cells. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:2491–2506. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee BS, et al. Characterization of the Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus K1 signalosome. J. Virol. 2005;79:12173–12184. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.19.12173-12184.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Heckl D, et al. Generation of mouse models of myeloid malignancy with combinatorial genetic lesions using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:941–946. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim S, Kim D, Cho SW, Kim J, Kim JS. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 2014;24:1012–1019. doi: 10.1101/gr.171322.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Choi YJ, et al. SERPINB1-mediated checkpoint of inflammatory caspase activation. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:276–287. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0303-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Weiss K, et al. Barrier Housing and Gender Effects on Allergic Airway Disease in a Murine House Dust Mite Model. Immunohorizons. 2021;5:33–47. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2000096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code GSE197042 Subseries, GSE197040 (lung) and GSE197041 (PCMC). All other data are available in the article and its Supplementary files or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.