Skip to main content
Parasitology logoLink to Parasitology
. 2022 Nov 7;150(2):157–171. doi: 10.1017/S0031182022001585

Hard ticks in Burmese amber with Australasian affinities

Lidia Chitimia-Dobler 1, Jason A Dunlop 2, Timo Pfeffer 3, Felix Würzinger 3, Stephan Handschuh 4, Ben J Mans 5,6,
PMCID: PMC10090639  PMID: 36341553

graphic file with name S0031182022001585_figAb.jpg

Key words: Archaeocroton, Australia, Bothriocroton, Cretaceous, fossil, Ixodida, Metastriata, Myanmar, New Zealand

Abstract

Three examples of metastriate hard ticks (Ixodida: Ixodidae) with apparent affinities to modern Australasian genera are described from the mid-Cretaceous (ca. 100 Ma) Burmese amber of Myanmar. Two nymphs of Bothriocroton muelleri sp. nov. represent the oldest (and only) fossil record of this genus, living members of which are restricted to Australia and predominantly feed on monitor lizards, snakes and echidnas. A female of Archaeocroton kaufmani sp. nov. shares its basis capitulum shape with the tuatara tick Archaeocroton sphenodonti (Dumbleton, 1943), the only extant member of this genus and an endemic species for New Zealand. The presence of 2 Australasian genera in Burmese amber is consistent with a previous record of an Ixodes Latreille, 1795 tick from this deposit which resembles Australian members of this genus. They further support an emerging hypothesis that fauna of the amber forest, which may have been on an island at the time of deposition, was at least partly Gondwanan in origin. A revised evolutionary tree for Ixodida is presented compiling data from several new Burmese amber ticks described in the last few years.

Introduction

Ticks (Arachnida: Parasitiformes: Ixodida) are haematophagous ectoparasites found on several vertebrate hosts. For an overview of their biology and economic significance as disease vectors, see Sonenshine and Roe (2013). About 900 living species are known (Guglielmone et al., 2010), divided across 3 families and 20 extant genera. Molecular data (Mans et al., 2012, 2019) suggest that the group may have originated during the Permian, but fossils are only known from the mid-Cretaceous or younger. For recent summaries, see, e.g. de la Fuente (2003), Dunlop et al. (2016), Chitimia-Dobler et al. (2017, 2018, 2022) and Peñalver et al. (2017). An extinct family and genus (Deinocrotonidae: Deinocroton Peñalver et al., 2017), possibly related to the extant Nuttalliellidae, was described from the Cretaceous (ca. 100 Ma) Burmese amber outcropping in Myanmar. A second extinct family, Khimairidae, has since been recognized (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2022), and the same amber deposit yields the oldest hard ticks (Ixodidae). These Burmese amber fossils currently comprise examples of the extant genera Ixodes Latreille, 1795 (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2022), Amblyomma CL Koch, 1844 (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2017) and Haemaphysalis (Allocereae) CL Koch, 1844 (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2018), as well as 2 extinct genera, Cornupalpatum Poinar and Brown, 2003, and Compluriscutula Poinar and Buckley, 2008, whose affinities probably lie close to Amblyomma.

Burmese amber thus yields an increasingly diverse and interesting tick fauna, both in terms of extinct taxa and the oldest records of several living groups. Here, 3 new ticks from amber are described which are of particular biogeographical significance with respect to an ongoing debate (e.g. Poinar, 2018) about whether Burmese amber hosts a fauna with Laurasian or Gondwanan affinities. Two well-preserved nymphs represent the first, and so far only, fossils referable to the extant Australian genus Bothriocroton Keirans, King and Sharrad, 1994, a group which is today found on monitor lizards, snakes and the short-beaked echidna among the monotremes. The third amber fossil is a female referred to Archaeocroton Barker and Burger, 2018 which resembles the extant tuatara tick (cf. Godfrey et al., 2008) from New Zealand. The new material draws 2 more modern tick genera back into the mid-Cretaceous and is consistent with the hypotheses that the so-called metastriate ticks (i.e. all hard ticks excluding Ixodes) radiated during the Early Cretaceous (Mans et al., 2012), or the Jurassic (Mans et al., 2019). In this context, the provisional evolutionary tree presented in Chitimia-Dobler et al. (2017, Fig. 3) is revised and updated to include both the new fossils from the present study and other published records in the recent literature.

Materials and methods

The 2 nymphs assigned to Bothriocroton come from the collection of Mr Patrick Müller and bear the original inventory numbers BUB1544 and BUB1573. The female assigned to Archaeocroton originates from the collections of the first author and has been deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin (accession number MB.A. 4452). Burmese amber mostly comes from deposits in the Hukawng valley of northern Myanmar and has been dated to the mid-Cretaceous (earliest Cenomanian), or about 98.79 ± 0.62 Ma (Shi et al., 2012). A subsequent study by Smith and Ross (2018) based on bivalve borings in the resin suggests that there has been only minimal reworking of the inclusions, and a Cenomanian age of about 100 Ma for the fossils may be appropriate. Further details about the history of discovery and the geological setting can be found in Grimaldi et al. (2002) and Ross et al. (2010); see also Selden and Ren (2017) for a recent review focused on the arachnids. An updated list of Burmese amber inclusions can be found in Ross (2021).

For photography, a Keyence VHX-6000 digital microscope (Keyence Itasca, IL, USA) with a tiltable stand and a combination of incident and transmitted light for focus stacking was used (with 100× to 1000× magnification). Image stacks were combined using software Helicon Focus 6.7.1 and polarized light was used to obtain more details. For computed tomography (μ-CT), the Archaeocroton sample was mounted on a specimen holder and scanned using a Zeiss Xradia MicroXCT-400 (Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Pleasanton, CA, USA) at 40 kVp tube voltage. The tomography was acquired using the 4X detector assembly. The reconstructed image volume was processed and visualized by volume rendering using 3D software package Amira 6.4. Drawings were prepared with a camera lucida attachment on a Leica M205C stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), again using a combination of incident and transmitted light where appropriate.

The Archaeocroton fossil is a female, which shows significant damage to 1 side of its body. All legs on the left side are broken as well as a little part of the idiosoma. The fact that part of the legs (tarsi) are broken and have an unusual position and all broken segments are very dry are signs of possible tick damage by the host during grooming and not during the polishing process of the amber piece.

Results

Systematic palaeontology for the Bothriocroton

Class Arachnida Lamarck, 1801

Order Parasitiformes Reuter, 1909

Suborder Ixodida Leach, 1815

Family Ixodidae Murray, 1877

Bothriocroton Keirans, King and Sharrad, 1994

Bothriocroton muelleri Chitimia-Dobler, Mans and Dunlop sp. nov.

Etymology: In honour of Mr Patrick Müller (Kashöfen), who has made some extraordinary fossil ticks in Burmese amber available for study.

Material: Holotype BUB1544 and paratype BUB1573 (coll. P. Müller). Burmese amber, Myanmar, Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian).

Diagnosis: Body oval, scutum subtriangular with few large punctuations, the second article of palps at least twice as long as the third article, 11 festoons, eyes absent, spiracle plates comma-shaped extruding noticeably from lateral body margins, coxae I–IV with external spurs, tarsus I strongly humped and tarsus IV humped.

Description of the holotype: BUB1544 is an unengorged nymph (Fig. 1); dorsal surface partially obscured because of scratches in the matrix.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Holotype of Bothriocroton muelleri sp. nov., P. Müller collection no. BUB1544, from Late Cretaceous (ca. 100 Ma) Burmese amber from Myanmar. (A) Dorsal overview. (B) Ventral overview. (C) Coxal spurs (arrowed). (D) Posterior idiosoma showing Y-shaped anal groove, extruded spiracle plates (arrowed) and 11 festoons (numbered). (E) Capitulum, including palps with long second article and hypostome with 2/2 dentition. (F) Leg I tarsus with prominent distal hump (arrowed) plus 6 additional lobes. (G) Leg IV tarsus with small hump (arrowed). Scale bars equal 1 mm (A, B), 250 μm (C), 500 μm (D) and 200 μm (E–G).

Idiosoma: Ornamentation indistinct; body oval; length from apices of scapulae to posterior body margin 2013 μm, breadth 1525 μm; scutum width 1056 μm (measured in middle of scutum), and 747 μm (from scapula to edge); subtriangular with hints of a few central large punctuations; scapulae short and rounded (Fig. 2A), cervical grooves long, shallow and linear anteriorly and slightly diverging posteriorly, not reaching end of scutum; eyes equivocal, probably absent; 11 festoons ranging from 145 to 197 μm in basal width (Fig. 1D); spiracle plates extruding noticeably from lateral body margins, 183 μm long, 136 μm wide (Figs 1D and 2B); anus visible, median, to the level of spiracle; anal groove Y-shape, close to anus with lateral arms reaching the upper limit of the anus and slightly converging (Fig. 2B), tail of the ‘Y’ does not reach middle festoon.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Camera lucida drawings of the specimen shown in Fig. 1. (A) Dorsal view. (B) Ventral view. (C) Details of leg I tarsus including humped distal region plus 6 additional lobes (numbered). (D) Details of capitulum; palpal articles numbered, note the elongate second article. (E) Details of leg IV tarsus with small hump. Legs numbered from I to IV. Scale bars equal 500 μm (A, B) and 100 μm (C–E).

Capitulum: Length from apices to posterior margin of basis 725.2 μm; basis capituli rectangular, 239.9 μm long and 334.8 μm broad, posterior margin straight, lateral margins straight, cornua absent, ventrally posterior margin straight, palpi elongated (Figs 1E and 2D), with length of 4 articles as follows: article 1, 79 μm; article 2, 254.1 μm – with external proximal side concave, while distal end of article 2 is noticeably wider, 1.86 times longer than third article – article 3, 136.5 μm; article 4, 31.9 μm; hypostome shorter than the palpi, length 182 μm, width at base 97.7 μm; hypostomal dentition 2/2 (Figs 1E and 2D), with 5 or 6 well-developed, rounded denticles in each file; porose areas absent.

Legs: Coxae I–IV with small external spur (Figs 1C and 2B); tarsus I with stout, strongly humped region distally (Figs 1F and 2C); 6 less prominent lobes present dorsally, decreasing in size in the direction of trochanter, no spurs, length 522 μm; tarsus IV also ends in hump (Figs 1G and 2E); claws paired, slender, simple, slightly curved; with distinct pulvillus on all legs; Haller's organ small, located before the strongly humped region.

Chaetotaxy: Dorsally any setae (see below) were not visible, as the amber matrix bears many scratches hindering further examination.

Description of the paratype: BUB1573 is another unengorged nymph (Fig. 3); slightly smaller than the holotype.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Paratype of B. muelleri sp. nov., P. Müller collection no. BUB1573, from Late Cretaceous (ca. 100 Ma) Burmese amber from Myanmar. (A) Dorsal overview. (B) Ventral overview. (C) Scutum showing large punctuations, cervical grooves (arrowed), but no evidence of eyes; note also several white, peg-like setae on the idiosoma. (D) Posterior idiosoma showing Y-shaped anal groove. (E) Capitulum. Scale bars equal 1 mm (A, B), 200 μm (C–E).

Idiosoma: Body oval with integument leathery; length from apices of scapulae to the posterior body margin 1333 μm, breadth 1207 μm; scutum width 896 μm (measured in middle of scutum), and 558 μm (from scapula to edge); subtriangular with few central large punctuations (Fig. 3C); scapulae short and rounded, cervical grooves long, shallow and linear anteriorly and slightly diverging posteriorly, not reaching end of scutum (Figs 3C and 4A); eyes absent; 11 festoons (first indistinct); spiracle plates on lateral body margins (Fig. 4B), 134 μm long, 88.8 μm broad; anus visible, median, up to level of spiracle; anal groove Y-shaped (Figs 3D and 4B), close to the anus with lateral arms reaching upper limit of anus and slightly converging, tail of the ‘Y’ does not reach middle festoon.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Camera lucida drawings of the paratype specimen shown in Fig. 3. (A) Dorsal view. (B) Ventral view. Legs numbered from I to IV. Scale bar equals 500 μm.

Capitulum: Length from apices to posterior margin of basis 482.5 μm; basis capituli rectangular, 143.8 μm long and 282.6 μm broad, posterior margin straight, lateral margins straight, cornua absent, ventrally posterior margin straight, palpi elongated, with length of 4 articles as follows: article 1, 43.5 μm; article 2, 175.6 μm – again with external proximal side concave and distal end of article 2 noticeably wider, 2.64 times longer than third article – article 3, 66.3 μm, without external spur; article 4, 32.5 μm; hypostome shorter than the palpi (Figs 3E and 4B), length 182 μm, width at base 97.7 μm; hypostomal dentition apparently 2/2 but not as clearly preserved as in holotype, at least 4 well-developed, rounded denticles in each file; porose areas absent.

Legs: Coxae with small external spur (not clearly visible on all legs); tarsus IV ends with slight hump (Fig. 4B); claws paired, slender, simple, slightly curved; with distinct pulvillus on all legs.

Chaetotaxy: Small hairs can again be observed on the legs (Fig. 4). Idiosoma covered dorsally by numerous, short, white, peg-like setae (Figs 3C and 4A) (68–83 μm long and 19.8 μm broad), but very few hairs observed on scutum; a few hairs visible ventrally.

Remarks: The 2 fossils described here as Bothriocroton muelleri sp. nov. are presumed conspecific, despite a slight difference in size, and represent a new hard tick genus for Burmese amber. They appear to lack eyes (Figs 1 and 2), and while blindness matches the condition in, e.g. Compluriscutula vetulum Poinar and Buckley, 2008 the pedipalps of C. vetulum differ from those in the new fossils. Specifically, in C. vetulum the 4th article of the pedipalp is long and ends with elongate terminal setae (cf. Fig. 2D here with its short article 4). Also the idiosoma in C. vetulum bears 13 festoons along its posterior margin (Poinar and Buckley, 2008, Fig. 3), while the new specimens have only 11 (Figs 1 and 2), all more or less the same size. The new taxon is thus the 4th Burmese amber tick species with 11 festoons; the others being Cornupalpatum burmanicum Poinar and Buckley, 2008, Amblyomma birmitum Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2017 and Haemaphysalis (Alloceraea) cretacea Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2018. Of these, C. burmanicum differs from the new fossil in having a unique extra claw on the penultimate (third) pedipalp article (Poinar and Brown, 2003, Figs 3 and 4), which is not seen in the new fossils (Fig. 2D). The absence of eyes in the new fossils is the strongest character for excluding A. birmitum. The other amber species in an extant genus, H. cretacea, has an elongate body, also with 11 festoons, and is eyeless, but unlike the new fossils it has the brevirostrate condition and has a dental formula with 8–10 denticles in a file.

Comparisons with extant ticks

The Amblyomma sensu Horak et al. (2002) remains a controversial genus that includes ticks with quite different morphologies and lifestyles. Twenty eyeless Amblyomma species have been noted in the literature (Horak et al., 2002), of which 19 are now valid (Madder et al., 2010; Schachat et al., 2018), all of which potentially merit comparison with the new (blind) nymphs. The validity of these eyeless Amblyomma species as a group is still subject to debate and a wider reevaluation/reclassification of the entire Amblyomma genus may be necessary (Kaufman, 1972; Klompen et al., 1997, 2002). In detail, several Amblyomma species were originally placed in another genus, Aponomma Neumann, 1899, although the revision of Kaufman (1972) revealed this to be a heterogeneous group of eyeless ticks with a predilection for reptiles. Kaufman (1972) divided Aponomma into 3 species groups: (1) ‘typical’ Aponomma, including 15 species of reptile-associated ticks from the Afrotropical and Oriental zoogeographic regions, (2) ‘indigenous Australian’ species (now Bothriocroton; see below) and (3) 2 ‘primitive’ Aponomma species.

Robertsicus and Archaeocroton

The ‘primitive’ Aponomma species sensu Kaufman (1972) has recently been elevated by Barker and Burger (2018) to new, monotypic genera, namely Robertsicus Barker and Burger, 2018 and Archaeocroton Barker and Burger, 2018. Robertsicus was erected for Robertsicus elaphensis (Price, 1958), formerly Amblyomma elaphense Price, 1958 that parasitizes the Trans-Pecos rat-snake in the Chihuahuan Desert of Mexico and south-eastern USA. Similar to the new fossils (Fig. 1E) this genus/species has a 2/2 hypostomal dentition, but differs in a scutum which is broader than long, but is cordiform, smooth and without cervical grooves (cf. Figs 2B and 4A of the new fossils), the setae and punctuations are minute and it has a very small, bluntly rounded spur on coxae I–IV (e.g. Keirans et al., 1985). In the new fossils the spurs are larger (Figs 1C and 2B). Archaeocroton was erected for Archaeocroton sphenodonti (Dumbleton, 1943). The 2 amber nymphs can also be excluded from Archaeocroton (see below) as the scutum here is sub-cordiform and the coxae have an external spur and a single subterminal spur on the trochanter (Kaufman, 1972). The new fossils lack spurs on the trochanter (Figs 2B and 4B).

Eyeless Amblyomma

Identifying ‘Amblyomma-like’ nymphs is extremely difficult in most cases, even more so with fossils. So far, there are no workable keys, and there are no established diagnostic characters for nymphs of either Amblyomma or Bothriocroton. However, a comparison with known eyeless Amblyomma nymphs (as the new fossil is eyeless) and with described Bothriocroton nymphs are given in the sections below.

Several characters exclude the eyeless Amblyomma species which corresponded to the ‘typical’ Aponomma species sensu Kaufman (1972). Nymphs of this species group are characterized by an anal groove being present and embracing the anus posteriorly; eyes absent; festoons present and numbering 11; basis capituli variable in form but often subrectangular or subtriangular; palpi elongate and constricted proximally, with article 2 being especially long and with reptiles as hosts (Horak et al., 2002; Klompen et al., 2002; Barker and Murrell, 2004; Beati et al., 2008).

Excluding the 2 ‘primitive’ ticks (see above) which are now in their own genera, the eyeless Aponomma sensu Kaufman (1972) is distributed as follows. There are 7 Afrotropical species: Amblyomma arcanum Karsch, 1879, Amblyomma exornatum Koch, 1844, Amblyomma flavomaculatum Lucas, 1846, Amblyomma inopinatum Santos Dias, 1989, Amblyomma latum Koch, 1844, Amblyomma orlovi Kolonin, 1992 and Amblyomma transversale Lucas, 1845. Amblyomma transversale has recently been reinstated as the separate genus Africaniella Travassos Dias, 1974 (Hornok et al., 2020). There is also 1 Afrotropical/Oriental species (Amblyomma gervaisi Lucas, 1847), 3 Oriental species (Amblyomma crassipes Neumann, 1901, Amblyomma fuscolineatum Lucas, 1847 and Amblyomma pattoni Neumann, 1910), 3 Oriental/Australasian species (Amblyomma fimbriatum Koch, 1844, Amblyomma trimaculatum Lucas, 1878 and Amblyomma varanense Supino, 1897) and 3 purely Australasian species (Amblyomma komodoense Oudemans, 1928, Amblyomma kraneveldi Anastos, 1956 and Amblyomma soembawense Anastos, 1956). Any of these could potentially be related to the new amber fossils – which could be taken as evidence for their inclusion in the ‘eyeless’ Amblyomma assemblage – but as detailed below these modern species are either known only from adults or differ from the new material.

Eyeless Amblyomma in the Afrotropics

Amblyomma arcanum and A. inopinatum were accepted as valid species by Guglielmone and Nava (2014) and only adults are known (Guglielmone et al., 2014), which makes it difficult to compare directly to the new amber species at the nymphal stage. For A. orlovi it is not clear whether this is a valid species and is known only from the female (Guglielmone et al., 2014). Amblyomma exornatum is known from various stages and differs from the new fossils in having a hypostome dentition of 3/3 (2/2 in the fossils: Figs 1E and 2D), teeth continuing posteriorly as crenulations and a small corona distally, and tarsus I with a small distal dorsal hump (Theiler, 1945a); as opposed to the large hump seen in the fossils (Figs 1F and 2C). Based on personal observations of A. flavomaculatum nymphs held in the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, observations include: a hypostome dentition of 3/3 with teeth in 6–7 lines, a rosette visible distally, the cervical grooves are short, deep and arched, the setae and interstitial punctuations are small and regularly distributed and the nymphal tarsus is similar to that of the female with less prominent protrusions (see also Saratsiotis, 1972).

Amblyomma latum is a senior synonym of several species and is characterized by a spot of red pigmentation in the eye region, cuticle which is thin and transparent with no hairs present. Again, comparative material (labelled as a synonym: Amblyomma leave Neumann, 1899) in the Museum für Naturkunde collection was examined. The hypostome has a 2/2 dentition (like the fossils) but with a corona, coxa I has an external spur sharper and longer than the internal one (only 1 spur in the fossils: Figs 1C and 2B), coxae II–IV have 1 median spur; tarsus I long; tarsi II–IV taper fairly gradually from a slight median swelling in some instances this swelling is large enough to produce the effect of a hump (Theiler, 1945b), but not to the same extent as in the fossils (Figs 1F and 2C). Finally, A. transversale has abdominal skin showing fine transverse striations, but hairs appear to be absent. The coxae have a single spur, tarsus I show well-pronounced false articulation, the distal portion with a large hump and 1 or 2 ventral spurs (Theiler, 1945b).

Eyeless Amblyomma from other regions

Taxa occurring outside (wholly or in part) of the Afrotropical region are potentially closer in terms of biogeography to possible Australasian-derived fossils. Amblyomma gervaisi ranges across the Afrotropical to the Oriental region. The species is glabrous, with a scutum longer than wide, subtriangular and non-ornamented (punctate in the fossils: Fig. 4A). Its cervical grooves are quite long and the tarsus is without a spur (Neumann, 1899). The purely Oriental species, A. crassipes has a subcordiform scutum and, similar to the fossils, has large punctuations over the entire surface. Unlike the fossils (Figs 1E and 2D), the hypostome has a 3/3 dentition at its base and a corona. Coxa I has 2 spurs and coxae II–IV 1 spur. Tarsus I shows a distinct swelling (Theiler, 1945a), but not the strong hump as in the fossils (Figs 1F and 2C). Amblyomma crassipes is similar to A. fuscolineatum (see below), but is provisionally considered valid because scant material is available for examination and the types have not been compared (Guglielmone et al., 2010).

Amblyomma fuscolineatum Lucas, 1847 is variously recorded in the literature (see Guglielmone and Nava, 2014). The description of the nymph in Schulze (1936) is confusing, but the hypostome has a 3/3 dentition and the cervical groove is divergent and reaches the end of the scutum. Amblyomma pattoni is a senior synonym of Aponomma pseudolaeve Schulze, 1935; cf. Kaufman (1972) and Camicas et al. (1998). The description in Schulze (1935) is very brief; noting that the nymph looks like the female except that the hypostome is different. Thus the hypostome dentition is 2/2 and punctuations are generally absent with just a few punctuations on the scapula (Schulze, 1935).

Other species occur from the Oriental through to the Australasian region. Amblyomma fimbriatum is a senior synonym of several taxa (see Guglielmone and Nava, 2014). It has the scutum postero-lateral margins straight or slightly convex, several, large, scattered punctuations and a few small ones, cervical grooves ending in short, ill-defined depressions, a hypostome dentition of 3/3 (2/2 in the fossils), coxae each with a single short spur (similar to the fossils) and tarsi humped but without spurs (Roberts, 1953). Amblyomma trimaculatum has a scutum with the postero-lateral margins slightly convex, punctuations relatively large and distributed mainly laterally, the hypostome dentition is again 3/3 and the tarsi are humped, but without spurs (Roberts, 1953). Finally, from the Australasian region, A. komodoense and A. kraneveldi only adults are known (Guglielmone et al., 2014) precluding direct comparison to the new fossil nymphs. Amblyomma soembawense Anastos, 1956 is only known from adults and the larva: the nymph is unknown (Guglielmone and Nava, 2014).

Assignment to Bothriocroton

In the absence of a strong match between the 2 amber nymphs and any of the ‘eyeless’ Amblyomma species (see above), the next taxon to consider is Bothriocroton. This subgenus was raised by Keirans et al. (1994) for Aponomma glebopalma Keirans, King and Sharrad, 1994 and subsequently expanded (Klompen et al., 2002) to include the rest of Kaufman's (1972) ‘indigenous Australian’ Aponomma ticks, with Bothriocroton also placed in its own subfamily: Bothriocrotoninae. The ‘indigenous Australian’ Aponomma species were recognized by Kaufman (1972) on the following character combinations: a single subterminal spur on the trochanter (absent in all other Aponomma and in Bothriocroton glebopalma, and also absent in the new fossils) and lateral grooves on the scutum of the male partial or complete – absent in ‘typical Aponomma’, R. elaphensis, and B. glebopalma – but present in A. sphenodonti. Thus absence of eyes, elongate palps, a subpentagonal basis capituli shape, coxae with 2 spurs in all instars and trochanters with a single subterminal ventral spur – albeit absent in B. glebopalma (see e.g. Klompen et al., 2002) – are morphological features that can be considered characteristic for the living Bothriocroton species. Spiracle plates extruding from the lateral border of the idiosoma anterior to the first festoon in Bothriocroton oudemansi (Neumann, 1910) were first described by Neumann (1910) and are present in the new fossil. The large wax glands laterally near setae s6, Md3 of Clifford et al. (1961), and anterior to the first festoons (Klompen et al., 1996) in the larvae are also promising diagnostic characters, but cannot be tested in the present fossil material.

The new Burmese amber nymphs are tentatively assigned to Bothriocroton based on a combination of: (1) the absence of eyes, (2) the second article of the palps being longer than the third (Figs 1E and 2D), (3) a dental formula of 2/2 in a file (Figs 1E and 2D), (4) coxae I–IV with obvious external spurs (Figs 1C and 2B), (5) the absence of a trochanter spur, (6) tarsus I with a stout, strong hump and 6 small dorsal protrusions (Figs 1F and 2C) and tarsus IV also ending with a hump (Figs 1G and 2E) and (7) spiracle plates extruding from the lateral border of the anterior to the first festoon (Fig. 1B and D). The 7th character could place the new fossil tick close to some Asian Amblyomma, species (see above) which, at least in the adult stage, have 3 lobes close to the hump: for example, Amblyomma supinoi in Voltzit and Keirans (2002). It is also similar to some Ornithodoros species – albeit in a different family, Argasidae – which also present prominent dorsal lobes, including bipartite lobes, which are used in species diagnoses (see e.g. Bakkes et al., 2018).

Bothriocroton is, numerically, a small tick genus today with only 7 extant species and no division into subgenera (Barker et al., 2014; Guglielmone et al., 2014). In addition to the type species (B. glebopalma), 4 of its species were traditionally referred to Aponomma: Bothriocroton auruginans (Schulze, 1936), Bothriocroton concolor (Neumann, 1899), Bothriocroton hydrosauri (Neumann, 1899) and Bothriocroton tachyglossi (Roberts, 1953). Note that B. tachyglossi was considered a synonym of B. hydrosauri, but there is convincing evidence for its validity (Guglielmone et al., 2010). The 2 remaining species are B. oudemansi (Neumann, 1910) – at one time considered a synonym of B. concolor, although there is sound evidence for its validity (Guglielmone et al., 2010) – and Bothriocroton undatum (Fabricius, 1775) (=Aponomma decorosum Koch, 1867).

Morphology shows Bothriocroton closely related to Amblyomma and the general leg and palpal chaetotaxy resembles that of Amblyomma sensu lato. Bothriocroton species are generally rather large ticks with long mouthparts: the longirostra condition. Iridescent ornamentation on the scutum is absent, but the living species B. glebopalma and B. undatum have white ornamentation, which could not be observed in the new fossils. Bothriocroton ticks can also be recognized by the adult hypostomal dentition, which is either in a 2/2 or 3/3 arrangement; with the internal row much smaller than other rows. The scutum is also broader than long. In females and nymphs, conspicuous posterolateral indentations formed by the confluence of larger punctuations are present.

Comparisons to living Bothriocroton species

The new amber fossils appear to be morphologically closest to the extant species B. undatum, especially with respect to the dental formula, the coxal spurs and stout, strong hump which is very evident on tarsus I and dorsal lobes which are not so prominent (Figs 1F and 2C), plus a small hump on tarsus IV (Figs 1G and 2E). The fossils also share with B. oudemansi the same dental formula and coxal spurs (see e.g. Beati et al., 2008); however, tarsal humps are lacking in this modern species. The scutum in the new fossils is subtriangular, broader than long, with its postero-lateral margins slightly convex. It is larger than the scutum in both B. undatum and B. oudemansi. The cervical grooves form long, deep depressions (Figs 2A and 4A), which broaden and become shallow and divergent, but do not reach the posterior scutal margin. It may also be noted that B. glebopalma has a deeply pitted and pilose scutum in both the adult and immature stages, unlike the other eyeless Amblyomma species previously placed in Aponomma (Keirans et al., 1994).

Systematic palaeontology for the Archaecroton

Emended diagnosis: Metastriate ticks with body sub-circular; 11 festoons; basis capitulum lateral angles produced into sub-conical processes; hypostome dentition 2/2 without corona; spiracle plates sub-circular; tarsi I–IV with pseudo-articulation at 1/3 of its length.

Family Ixodidae Murray, 1877

Genus Archaeocroton Barker and Burger, 2018

Archaeocroton kaufmani Chitimia-Dobler, Mans and Dunlop sp. nov.

Etymology: After T. S. Kaufman who first recognized the distinctness of the modern species now placed in Archaeocroton.

Material: Holotype from Burmese amber, Myanmar. Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian) in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin (accession number MB.A. 4452).

Diagnosis: Fossil Archaeocroton in which cornuae are extremely broad; spiracle plates comma shape; hypostome dentition 2/2 without corona; 11 festoons; tarsi I–IV with pseudo-articulation to the 1/3 of its length (Supplementary Fig. 1); tarsus IV ends with a dorso-apical hook.

Description: Female.

Idiosoma: Body subcircular, slightly elongate, widest posteriorly, integument leathery; length from middle of scutum to posterior body margin 1390 μm. Maximum width (measured in middle, behind third legs) 1984 μm; scutum 1156 μm wide (measured in middle), or 837 μm long (from middle to edge); sub-cordiform, with few spare punctuations (Figs 5 and 6); scapulae short and rounded. Cervical grooves not visible (Figs 5 and 6). Posterior margin of idiosoma with 11 visible festoons (width 176–229 μm) (Figs 5 and 6), no grooves separate festoons from the rest of idiosoma. Anus visible, median; anal groove semi-circular, contouring behind anus (Figs 5 and 6). Genital aperture not clearly visible, apparently located approximately between coxae II and III. Stigmas best seen in CT scans (Fig. 7), comma-shaped with round macula; left stigma 392 μm long and 265 μm wide, right stigma 403 μm long and 275 μm wide.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Holotype and only known specimen of the hard tick Archaeocroton kaufmani sp. nov. (Ixodida: Ixodidae) in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin (accession number MB.A. 4452).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Interpretative camera lucida drawings of the specimen shown in Fig. 5. Legs numbered from I to IV and festoons numbered from 1 to 11.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

CT images of the holotype (penetrating the artefacts) and emphasizing again the presence of 11 festoons (left both above and down). Additionally highlighting the outline of the stigma (left down), chelicera structure (right above) and the 2 + 2 dentition of the hypostome (right down). The volume renderings especially emphasize air-filled cavities in the amber fossil.

Capitulum: Length from apices to posterior margin of basis 569 μm. Basis capitulum triangular dorsally with lateral angles produced into sub-conical processes, length 452 μm, maximum width 188 μm, more than twice as broad as long; posterior margin straight, cornuae extremely broad and very blunt. Ventrally sub-triangular, lateral projection distinct and appears acute in ventral view; auriculas indistinct; porose areas only slightly visible, but sub-circular, located centrally on basis capituli. Palpi elongate; 4 articles with lengths: article 1, 82 μm; article 2, 280 μm (with external proximal side concave); article 3, 133 μm; article 4 could not be measured. Hypostome somewhat shorter than adjacent palpi (Figs 5 and 6); hypostomal dentition 2/2. The external left file has 10 well-developed denticles, the external right file has only 9; internal files have 7 smaller denticles; apical corona absent. Chelicerae well-developed, equal in length to hypostome, with minute dorsal denticles on internal side of the unmovable fingers and with sawdust appearance due to the 6 kinds of teeth (Fig. 7).

Legs: Coxae I–IV without internal spurs; external spur on coxae I–IV is small. Tarsus I taper distally and has a pseudo-articulation at 1/3 of its length; tarsi IV 520 μm (length of tarsus 190 μm, length of tarsus 330 μm) with pseudo-articulation at 1/3 of its length and ending with a dorso-apical hook; tarsi II and III with pseudo-articulation at 1/3 of its length.

Chaetotaxy: Short hairs observed on all leg articles. Palps bear long seta on internal (mesal) side of second article, and 3 long internal setae on third article, plus 1–2 setae on external side of the second and third articles (Figs 5 and 6).

Anomaly: Basis capitulum reveals an abnormality on the left side (Figs 5 and 6). Deformation occurs before sub-conical process and goes a little below the basis capitulum. Ventrally lateral projection not completely developed, appearing more round than angular. Anomaly also reaches basis of hypostome, where right external file has only 9 denticles (not 10 as per left part) and is thicker than normal.

Remarks: The tuatara tick was originally described as Aponomma sphenodonti Dumbleton, 1943 and was regarded as a ‘primitive Aponomma species’ sensu Kaufman (1972), who hinted that it may warrant a separate genus. Aponomma Neumann, 1899 was subsequently synonymized with Amblyomma by Klompen et al. (2002) (see also above), while Barker and Burger (2018) confirmed Kaufman's earlier intuition and recognized the tuatara tick as the sole representative of a new genus, Archaeocroton, so named for retaining several apparently plesiomorphic features. The body of the new female amber specimen is sub-circular, slightly wider than long, widest posteriorly and has a leathery integument. In this sense it is similar to the previously described Burmese amber fossil A. birmitum as well as some living members of Amblyomma (Voltzit and Keirans, 2003), to B. oudemansi (Beati et al., 2008), R. elaphensis and to A. sphenodonti (see e.g. Barker and Burger, 2018). The new fossil lacks eyes, and in this sense it is similar to the Burmese amber species C. burmanicum (Poinar and Brown, 2003), C. vetulum (Poinar and Buckley, 2008) and H. cretacea (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2018).

The number of festoons around the posterior margin of the idiosoma can be a useful diagnostic character in metastriate ticks, both at the genus and species levels. Hyalomma have 5, Haemaphysalis have 9 or 11 and Amblyomma have 11 (Neumann, 1911; Nuttall et al., 1911; Lindquist et al., 2016). The central festoon is usually positioned directly behind the anus (Clifford and Anastos, 1960). The new fossil has 11 well-defined festoons (Figs 5–7) and no groove separates the festoons from the rest of the idiosoma. The number of festoons and the shape of the stigmata are thus morphological features similar to the Burmese amber fossil A. birmitum. The new fossil has the genital aperture located between coxae II and III. This would be similar to fossil A. birmitum (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2017) and to some modern Amblyomma species coming from former Gondwanan regions, and also to B. oudemansi (Kaufman, 1972; Beati et al., 2008) and to A. sphenodonti (Barker and Burger, 2018). By contrast, other species have the genital aperture located between coxae II (Voltzit and Keirans, 2003; Voltzit, 2007), except for 3 Neotropical Amblyomma species which have the genital aperture between coxae III: namely Amblyomma cruciferum Neumann, 1901, Amblyomma darwini Hirst and Hirst, 1910 and Amblyomma humerale Koch, 1844 (Voltzit, 2007).

The key character here is the shape of the basis capitulum, which is very distinctive in the new fossil. It is triangular dorsally with lateral angles produced into sub-conical processes and extremely broad with very blunt cornuae, while ventrally it is sub-triangular; the lateral projections are distinct and appear acute with indistinct auriculas. A basis capitulum of this form is very rare among the extant ixodid females. This triangular shape dorsally and sub-triangular with lateral projections ventrally is specific for females of A. sphenodonti, and for nymphs and larvae of Hyalomma, but not for the adults (Apanaskevich and Horak, 2008). Some extant Amblyomma species can have a (sub)triangular basis capitulum, as do the extinct Burmese amber genera Cornupalpatum and Compluriscutula (Poinar and Brown, 2003; Poinar and Buckley, 2008), however, in all these cases the basis capitulum is not as broad as in the current fossil.

The denticles on the hypostome are usually arranged in parallel longitudinal rows, or files, and the dentition formula indicates the number of files on each side of the midline of the hypostome. For example, 2/2 indicates the presence of 2 files on each side. The lateral-most row is designated as file 1. The relative size of the denticles differs characteristically between different species of ticks, such that the number of teeth in each file is a useful diagnostic character. The lateral file generally has denticles at least as large as any present elsewhere on the hypostome (Lindquist et al., 2016). In the new fossil, the hypostome tooth columns have a 2/2 arrangement, distributed along the whole length of the hypostome (Figs 5 and 6), with 10 well-developed teeth in the external file and 7 smaller teeth in the second, without corona. All modern Asian, African and Neotropical Amblyomma adults have a 3/3 or 4/4 tooth arrangement, or even 5/5 in females of Amblyomma clypeolatum Neumann, 1899 (Voltzit and Keirans, 2002, 2003; Voltzit, 2007). In a few modern species the internal files are also less developed than the external ones: A. sphenodonti (Barker and Burger, 2018), B. tachyglossi (Roberts, 1953) and A. transversale (Theiler, 1945b). In A. sphenodonti the hypostome tooth columns have a 2/2 arrangement, with 5 or 6 teeth in a file and corona (Dumbleton, 1943; Kaufman, 1972). The chelicerae structure is unique for ixodid ticks, none of the extant tick species is known to have a sawdust appearance on the internal side of the unmovable fingers (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Comparative sketches of the distinctively triangular basis capitulum in dorsal view in the extant tuatara tick, Archaeocroton sphenodonti Dumbleton, 1943 (left), and the new amber species A. kaufmani sp. nov. (right), with the special chelicera structure. Not to scale.

In the amber fossil the stigma is comma-shaped, with round macula and about 392–403 μm long. In A. sphenodonti the stigma is sub-circular and 230 μm long, slightly angulate at a posterior dorsal angle (Dumbleton, 1943). Tarsus IV (527 μm) of the new fossil has a pseudo-articulation at 1/3 of its length and ends in a dorso-apical hook. Tarsi II and III have also a pseudo-articulation at 1/3 of its length, but no dorso-apical hook. Pseudo-articulation of tarsi I and IV is also characteristic for A. sphenodonti. The dorso-apical hook in the new fossil is not present on other ixodid species and represents a useful diagnostic character; see above. Usually, Amblyomma adults have 1 or 2 ventro-apical hook(s) (Kaufman, 1972; Voltzit and Keirans, 2003) as do some Dermacentor species (Filippova, 1997). Taken together, the observed morphological characteristics suggest that the new fossil is closely related to the tuatara tick A. sphenodonti and can also be placed in Archaeocroton.

Anomaly in the basis capitulum

The anomaly observed in the basis capitulum with a discrepancy in the number of teeth between the left and right files is the first example recorded for a tick in amber. It can be classified as an exoskeleton anomaly. A number of biological or non-biological factors may cause morphological abnormalities in ticks: (1) somatic or germinal mutations, (2) injury, (3) exposure to chemical agents, (4) environmental stress, (5) host resistance to tick infestation or (6) blood-feeding on unusual hosts (Feldman-Muhsam, 1948; Campana-Rouget, 1959a, 1959b; Latif et al., 1988; Guglielmone et al., 1999; Dergousoff and Chilton, 2007; Nowak-Chmura, 2012). Zharkov et al. (2000) considered that the exoskeleton abnormalities in Ixodes tick are greatly dependent on anthropogenic pressure, and it may be the most reliable way of biomonitoring the environment pollution level.

Scutum pattern and dental formula

No Amblyomma species have been described thus far with white spots related to colour patterns on the festoons, even more on all festoons and the side of the scutum. Among hard ticks, many species of Metastriata have intricate ornamentation on the scutum and/or festoons that is often used as a taxonomic character. However, the biological function(s) of this ornamentation remains unclear (Schachat et al., 2018). The scutum pattern of the fossil is similar to A. sphenodonti (Barker and Burger, 2018). In fact, the white pattern on the scutum and festoons is related to the parts of extant females where the purple zones are not observed. In addition, the new fossil shares with A. sphenodonti the shape of the basis capitulum and the shape and position of the porose areas (cf. Barker and Burger, 2018). Amblyomma birmitum, the first fossil female, has also a 2/2 dentition but the teeth are of the same size (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2017). Some extant species have the hypostome dentition of the fossil female, e.g. R. elaphensis has a 2/2 hypostomal dentition (although the hypostome figured has a single supernumerary tooth between files 1 and 2 on the left side of the hypostome as viewed from above) and the hypostome ends with a denticle corona (Keirans et al., 1985), while B. oudemansi also has the same dental formula (Beati et al., 2008).

Discussion

All living Bothriocroton ticks are restricted to the Australian faunal region while the single living Archaeocroton species is only found in New Zealand. The new Burmese amber fossils are thus not only the oldest putative records of these 2 genera, but also the only records outside their current biogeographical areas. An obvious question is whether the modern representatives are relicts of previously much wider distributions. Alternatively, are these Australasian genera Gondwanan in origin, with lineages that migrated into the area that became the Burmese amber forest prior to the mid-Cretaceous? Burmese amber was deposited on the so-called West Burma terrane which is presumed to have rifted from northern Australia at some point in Earth history. It forms part of the Incertus Arc which in some models is thought to have formed in the Late Jurassic (about 155 Ma) and was potentially linked to northern Australia and India via the Woyla Arc (see e.g. Hall, 2012). This connection may have provided a short window of land bridges for colonization of the Burma terrane by Gondwanan faunal elements, before the bridges were lost at the beginning of the Cretaceous (ca. 140 Ma). By the time of amber deposition (ca. 100 Ma) the Burmese amber forest was probably on an island (e.g. Westerweel et al., 2019), which eventually collided with southeast Asia.

This scenario would be consistent with Bothriocroton and Archaeocroton originating in Gondwana, with some lineages migrating onto the West Burma terrane and surviving until at least the mid-Cretaceous. Similarly, it explains the presence of an Australasian-like Ixodes in Burmese amber reported by Chitimia-Dobler et al. (2022). Mans et al.'s (2019) estimate of (maximally) 186 Ma for the radiation of metastriate ticks and 164 Ma for the divergence of the main metastriate lineages is well before the date at which the land bridges may have been lost (140 Ma). In other words, metastriates in Gondwanan territories may have diversified into the current genera just prior to the time when they could have still made their way onto the West Burma terrain. If this was not the case, and if the Burmese amber fauna were to be shown to be predominantly Laurasian in origin, the disjunct distribution for Bothriocroton and Archaeocroton in Burmese amber and in Australia and New Zealand, respectively needs explanation. Either a very broad former distribution across Asia and Australasia needs to be explained, or a more recent, probably post-Cretaceous, migration of these ticks from Asia to Australasia, plus the extinction of the genera in Asia needs to be inferred.

An interesting parallel case of Burmese amber hosting an endemic New Zealand taxon is the beetle genus Cyclaxyra Broun, 1893 (Cyclaxyridae) (Wu et al., 2018). Further examples of Burmese amber beetles which are morphologically very similar to living relatives restricted to an austral distribution (e.g. Australia, New Zealand, southern South America) were discussed by Cai et al. (2019 and references therein). They suggested that the modern populations may be relicts of a previously much wider distribution.

Hosts of the living relatives

Examining the hosts of modern Bothriocroton and Archaeocroton species may also be informative for reconstructing the evolutionary history of these genera. Bothriocroton hydrosauri and B. tachyglossi have been mostly collected from the short-beaked echidna, or spiny anteater, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Shaw, 1792) (Monotrema: Tachyglossidae). In detail, Andrews et al. (2006) reported the 2 species from Wowan, Queensland, Boompa, Monto, Gladstone, Woolooga, Biloela, Rockhampton, Emu Park, Belmont, Yeppoon, St Lawrence, Mackay, Marian; from cattle in Dululu, Mackay, Degilbo and from an unknown host in Woolooga, Queensland. Putative specimens of ‘A. hydrosauri’ from a snake from the Darling Downs proved, on re-examination, to be B. undatum. In summary, no specimens of B. hydrosauri or B. tachyglossi were seen from reptiles in Queensland or from echidnas in southern Queensland (Andrews et al., 2006). Bothriocroton glebopalma has been described from the black-palmed rock monitor lizard Varanus glebopalma Mitchell, 1955 and the Kimberly rock monitor Varanus glauerti Mertens, 1957 in Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Some specimens were collected from formalin-preserved hosts, revealing that all stages of B. glebopalma parasitize monitor lizards (Keirans et al., 1994). Bothriocroton glebopalma was found in an area where A. fimbriatum, a parasite of monitor lizards and various species of snakes, was the only known member of the genus found in both regions mentioned above (Keirans et al., 1994). However, the same study also described Amblyomma glauerti Keirans, King and Sharrad, 1994 that occur in the same regions and parasitize the same hosts.

The living species which best matches the new fossils, B. undatum, has also been recorded from echidnas, snakes and monitor lizards (e.g. Roberts, 1964). In a wider context, Chitimia-Dobler et al. (2018) reviewed parameters in the fossil record for host–parasite co-evolution in ticks. It is conceivable that B. muelleri fed on dinosaurs or reptiles in the Burmese amber forests similar to related Bothriocroton lineages in Australasia. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene extinction event may have caused extant Bothriocroton species to undergo host switches to monotremes or to remain with reptiles.

A fossil assignable to Archaeocroton is of particular interest in that the only living species is hosted by the tuatara. The host lives in borrows associated with the fairy prion bird, Pachyptila turtur (Kuhl, 1820). Although this bird has been found infested with Ixodes auritulus Neumann, 1904, it has never been found carrying A. sphenodonti, which suggests that the tuatara tick is quite host-specific (Dumbleton, 1943). The tuatara is, of course, the only living representative of the Rhynchocephalia. This clade is the sister group of Squamata (i.e. lizards and snakes), many of which host species of Amblyomma. As such, a tick with several plesiomorphic characters is associated with a reptile popularly considered to be a ‘living fossil’ (Cree, 2014). In fact, the living fossil moniker has been challenged, or at least requires careful definition, as the tuatara belongs to a previously much more diverse lineage (Rauhut et al., 2012; Herrera-Flores et al., 2017) with rhyncocephalians originating in the Triassic and diversifying in the Jurassic. The new amber fossil may have also used a rhyncocephalian host. Although diversity dropped after the Jurassic, several rhyncocephalian lineages were still present during the mid-Cretaceous (Herrera-Flores et al., 2017, Fig. 1), even if the known fossil genera of similar age to the Burmese amber forest are all American rather than Asian. Determination of the host(s) of the fossil A. kaufmani sp. nov. would be an intriguing prospect, but for the moment remains equivocal.

Tick evolutionary tree

As noted above, Bothriocroton and Archaeocroton belong to the Metastriata; a clade encompassing all hard ticks excluding Ixodes. In detail, Metastriata includes 14 extant and 2 extinct genera. Recent molecular studies have clarified relationships between metastriate genera to some extent (Mans et al., 2019, 2021; Kelava et al., 2021). As such, deep divergences exist at the base of the metastriate tree that result in various separate lineages (Fig. 9). This includes a separate lineage composed of Archaeocroton, Bothriocroton, Haemaphysalis sensu stricto and Haemaphysalis (Allocereae) and a lineage composed of Africaniella and Robertsicus. The extinct Compluriscutula may represent another distinct lineage closely related to either of these prior lineages. Another lineage includes Amblyomma and the Rhipicephalinae (Anomalohimalaya, Cosmiomma, Dermacentor, Hyalomma, Margaropus, Rhipicephalus and Rhipicentor). This latter lineage probably also includes the extinct Cornupalpatum. Possible reasons for the current inability to define the basal relationships of the metastriate genera more clearly may be the rapid diversification of lineages as well as possible extinction of various metastriate genera (represented by Compluriscutula and Cornupalpatum, but probably others as well). Previous hard ticks from Burmese amber documented Amblyomminae (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2017) and Haemaphysalinae (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2018) and now a third subfamily: Bothriocrotoninae. In the phylogeny presented above this represents one of the first lineages to branch off from the metastriate stem.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Evolutionary tree, revised and modified from Chitimia-Dobler et al. (2017, Fig. 3). Included here is Peñalver et al.'s (2017) extinct, mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber genus Deinocroton, which is thought to be close to Nuttalliella, the extinct genus Khimaira and the extant genera Ixodes and Haemaphysalis (Chitimia-Dobler et al., 2018, 2022), together with the new Cretaceous records of Archaecroton and Bothriocroton (this study). The phylogeny and estimated times of divergence are according to Barker and Murrell (2004), Mans et al. (2019), Mans et al. (2021) and Kelava et al. (2021).

Metastriata is estimated to have split off from Prostriata (=Ixodes) in the Early Triassic (ca. 234 ± 18 Ma) with a further putative divergence into the modern genera in the Early Cretaceous at ca. 180 ± 15 Ma (Mans et al., 2019). In other words, the Burmese amber fossils assigned to the Amblyomminae, Haemaphysalinae and now also Bothriocrotoninae and Archaeocrotininae came from a time after the suggested radiation into living genera (Fig. 9). Bothriocroton and Amblyomma, representing the 2 most basal subfamilies (as well as Archaeocroton) tend to be found on reptiles (see also above), while Haemaphysalis tends to be associated with mammals. The subfamily Rhipicephalinae – which are exclusively found on placental mammals – may well be much earlier to the suggested radiation and is currently only known convincingly from a handful of subfossil records.

In this context, a putative Baltic amber example of the rhipicephaline genus Hyalomma in de la Fuente (2003) was treated as a misidentified caeculid mite by E. Sidorchuk in Chitimia-Dobler et al. (2017). Its interpretation as a tick was defended by Estrada-Peña and de la Fuente (2018), who suggested that the distinctive inward-facing ‘rakes’ on the legs could be artefacts of setae covered with debris. This interpretation remains unconvincing. The fossil in question was originally interpreted as male, and is now considered a female, and a clear expression of characters belonging to Hyalomma, or to ticks in general, is absent. For this reason, the amber Hyalomma record is excluded from Fig. 9 and suggests that it remains an unreliable calibration point for molecular clock studies as was used previously (Sands et al., 2017; Mans et al., 2019).

In conclusion, the Burmese amber fossils have to date yielded a remarkable assemblage of tick fossils of both extant and extinct families and genera. This includes the extinct families and genera Deinocrotonidae, Khimairidae, Compluriscutula and Cornupalpatum, respectively. It also includes the extant genera, notably the prostriate Ixodes and the metastriate Amblyomma, Archaecroton, Bothriocroton and Haemaphysalis, giving them minimum dates of origin of at least 100 Ma that serve as valuable calibration points for molecular dating. There is a ray of hope that future findings will highlight more genera that will deepen our understanding of tick evolution.

Acknowledgements

We thank Patrick Müller for making this material available for study and Andy Ross for comments on the biogeography of Burmese amber arthropods. We also thank Santiago Nava and Richard Robbins for providing literature.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182022001585.

S0031182022001585sup001.docx (130.9KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material

Data

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary files).

Author's contributions

L. C.-D. shot the photographs, described the species; B. J. M. contributed to the description and interpreted the tick evolution; S. H. carried out the micro-CT scanning providing images and videos for the description; J. A. D. made the drawing for all specimens. L. C.-D., B. J. M. and J. A. D. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and proofed the final version of the manuscript.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

We acknowledge the current sociopolitical conflict in northern Myanmar that resumed in 2017. We have limited our research to material predating this conflict. We hope that research on specimens collected before the conflict, while acknowledging the situation in Kachin state will raise awareness of this current conflict and its associated human cost.

References

  1. Andrews RH, Beveridge I, Bull CM, Chilton NB, Dixon B and Petney T (2006) Systematic status of Aponomma tachyglossi Roberts (Acari: Ixodidae) from echidnas, Tachyglossus aculeatus, from Queensland, Australia. Systematic and Applied Acarology 11, 23–39. [Google Scholar]
  2. Apanaskevich DA and Horak IG (2008) The genus Hyalomma Koch, 1844: V. Re-evaluation of the taxonomic rank of taxa comprising the H. (Euhyalomma) marginatum Koch complex of species (Acari: Ixodidae) with re-description of all parasitic stages and notes on biology. International Journal of Acarology 34, 13–42. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakkes DK, De Klerk D, Latif AA and Mans BJ (2018) Integrative taxonomy of Afrotropical Ornithodoros (Ornithodoros) (Acari: Ixodida: Argasidae). Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 9, 1006–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker SC and Burger TD (2018) Two new genera of hard ticks, Robertsicus n. gen. and Archaeocroton n. gen., and the solution to the mystery of Hoogstraal's and Kaufman's ‘primitive’ tick from the Carpathian Mountains. Zootaxa 4500, 543–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker SC and Murrell A (2004) Systematics and evolution of ticks with a list of valid genus and species names. Parasitology 129, S15–S36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker SC, Walker AR and Campelo D (2014) A list of the 70 species of Australian ticks; diagnostic guides to and species accounts of Ixodes holocyclus (paralysis tick), Ixodes cornuatus (southern paralysis tick) and Rhipicephalus australis (Australian cattle tick); and consideration of the place of Australia in the evolution of ticks with comments on four controversial ideas. International Journal of Parasitology 44, 941–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beati L, Keirans JE and Durden LA (2008) Bothriocroton oudemansi (Neumann, 1910) n. comb. (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae), an ectoparasite of western long-beaked echidna in Papua New Guinea: redescription of the male and first description of the female and nymph. Systematic Parasitology 69, 185–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai C, Lawrence JF, Yamamoto S, Leschen RAB, Newton AF, Ślipiński A, Yin Z, Huang D and Engel MS (2019) Basal polyphagan beetles in mid-Cretaceous amber from Myanmar: biogeographic implications and long-term morphological stasis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286, 20182175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Camicas J-L, Hervy JP, Adam F and Morel P-C (1998) The Ticks of the World. Nomenclature, Described Stages, Hosts, Distribution (Acarida: Ixodida). Paris: Orstom. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campana-Rouget Y (1959a) La tératologie des tiques. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee 34, 209–260 (in French). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campana-Rouget Y (1959b) La tératologie des tiques (fin). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee 34, 354–431 (in French). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chitimia-Dobler L, De Araujo BC, Ruthensteiner B, Pfeffer T and Dunlop JA (2017) Amblyomma birmitum a new species of hard tick in Burmese amber. Parasitology 144, 1411–1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chitimia-Dobler L, Pfeffer T and Dunlop JA (2018) Haemaphysalis cretacea a nymph of a new species of hard tick in Burmese amber. Parasitology 145, 1440–1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chitimia-Dobler L, Mans BJ, Handschuh S and Dunlop JA (2022) A remarkable assemblage of ticks from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. Parasitology 149, 820–830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Clifford CM and Anastos G (1960) The use of chaetotaxy in the identification of larval ticks (Acarina: Ixodidae). Journal of Parasitology 46, 567–578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Clifford CM, Anastos G and Elbl A (1961) The larval ixodid ticks of the Eastern United States (Acarina: Ixodidae). Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America 2, 213–237. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cree A (2014) Tuatara: Biology and Conservation of a Venerable Survivor. Canterbury: Canterbury University Press, 584pp. [Google Scholar]
  18. de la Fuente J (2003) The fossil record and the origin of ticks (Acari: Parasitiformes: Ixodida). Experimental and Applied Acarology 29, 331–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dergousoff SJ and Chilton NB (2007) Abnormal morphology of an adult Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni (Acari: Ixodidae). Journal of Parasitology 93, 708–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dumbleton LJ (1943) A new tick from the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 24, 185B–190B. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dunlop JA, Apanaskevich DA, Lehmann J, Hoffmann R, Fusseis F, Ehlke M, Zachow S and Xiao X (2016) Microtomography of the Baltic amber tick Ixodes succineus reveals affinities with the modern Asian disease vector Ixodes ovatus. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16, 203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Estrada-Peña A and de la Fuente J (2018) The fossil record and the origin of ticks revisited. Experimental and Applied Acarology 75, 255–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Feldman-Muhsam B (1948) On some abnormalities in Hyalomma savignyi. Parasitology 40, 93–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Filippova NA (1997) Ixodid ticks of the subfamily Amblyomminae. In Fauna of Russia and neighbouring countries. 4 Nauka, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publishing House.
  25. Godfrey SS, Bull CM and Nelson NJ (2008) Seasonal and spatial dynamics of ectoparasite infestation of a threatened reptile, the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). Medical and Veterinary Entomology 22, 374–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grimaldi DA, Engel MS and Nascimbene PC (2002) Fossiliferous Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma): its rediscovery, biotic diversity, and paleontological significance. American Museum Novitates 3361, 1–71. [Google Scholar]
  27. Guglielmone AA and Nava S (2014) Names for Ixodidae (Acari: Ixodoidea): valid, synonyms, incertae sedis, nomina dubia, nomina nuda, lapsus, incorrect and suppressed names – with notes on confusions and misidentifications. Zootaxa 3767, 1–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guglielmone AA, Castella J, Mangold AJ, Estrada-Peña A and Viñabal EA (1999) Phenotypic anomalies in a collection of Neotropical ticks (Ixodidae). Acarologia 40, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  29. Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG, Apanaskevich DA, Petney TN, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG, Shao R and Barker SC (2010) The Argasidae, Ixodidae and Nuttalliellidae (Acari: Ixodida) of the world: a list of valid species names. Zootaxa 2528, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  30. Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG, Apanaskevich DA, Petney TN, Estrada-Peña A and Horak IG (2014) The Hard Ticks of the World (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae). Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hall R (2012) Late Jurassic–Cenozoic reconstructions of the Indonesian region and the Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics 570–571, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  32. Herrera-Flores JA, Stubbs TL and Benton MJ (2017) Macroevolutionary patterns in Rhynchocephalia: is the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) a living fossil? Paleontology 60, 319–328. [Google Scholar]
  33. Horak IG, Camicas J-L and Kierans JE (2002) The Argasidae, Ixodidae and Nuttalliellidae (Acari: Ixodida): a world list of valid tick names. Experimental and Applied Acarology 28, 27–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hornok S, Kontschán J, Takács N, Chaber A, Halajian A, Abichu G, Kamani J, Szekeres S and Plantard O (2020) Molecular phylogeny of Amblyomma exornatum and Amblyomma transversale, with reinstatement of the genus Africaniella (Acari: Ixodidae) for the latter. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 11, 101494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaufman TS (1972) A Revision of the Genus Aponomma Neumann, 1899 (Acarina: Ixodidae). PhD thesis. University of Maryland, College Park, United States of America. [Google Scholar]
  36. Keirans JE, William G and Degenhardt WG (1985) Aponomma elaphense Price, 1959 (Acari: Ixodidae): diagnosis of the adults and nymph with first description of the larva. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 98, 711–717. [Google Scholar]
  37. Keirans JE, King DR and Sharrad RD (1994) Aponomma (Bothriocroton) glebopalma, n. subgen., n. sp., and Amblyomma glauerti n. sp. (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae), parasites of monitor lizards (Varanidae) in Australia. Journal of Medical Entomology 31, 132–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kelava S, Mans BJ, Shao R, Moustafa MAM, Matsuno K, Takano A, Kawabata H, Sato K, Fujita H, Ze C, Plantard O, Hornok S, Gao S, Barker D, Barker SC and Nakao R (2021) Phylogenies from mitochondrial genomes of 120 species of ticks: insights into the evolution of the families of ticks and of the genus Amblyomma. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 12, 101577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Klompen JSH, Black WC IV, Keirans JE and Oliver JH Jr. (1996) Evolution of ticks. Annual Review of Entomology 41, 141–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Klompen JSH, Oliver JH Jr., Keirans JE and Homsher PJ (1997) A re-evaluation of relationships in the Metastriata (Acari: Parasitiformes: Ixodida). Systematic Parasitology 38, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  41. Klompen JSH, Dobson SJ and Barker SC (2002) A new subfamily, Bothriocrotoninae n. subfam., for the genus Bothriocroton Keirans, King & Sharrad, 1994 status amend (Ixodida: Ixodidae), and the synonymy of Aponomma Neumann, 1899 with Amblyomma Koch, 1844. Systematic Parasitology 53, 101–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lamarck JB (1801) Systême des animaux sans vertèbres, ou Tableau général desclasses, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux. Chez L'auteur, au Muséum d'Hist. Naturelle, An IX, Paris, pp. 1–472.
  43. Latif AA, Dhadialla TS and Newson RM (1988) Abnormal development of Amblyomma variegatum (Acarina: Ixodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 25, 142–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Leach WE (1815) A tabular view of the external characters of four classes of animals, which Linné arranged under Insecta; with the distribution of the genera composing three of these classes into orders, &c. and descriptions of several new genera and species. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 11, 306–400. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lindquist EE, Galloway TD, Artsob H, Lindsay LR, Drebot M, Wood H and Robbins RG (2016) A handbook to the ticks of Canada (Ixodida: Ixodidae, Argasidae). Biological Survey of Canada 7, 1–317. [Google Scholar]
  46. Madder M, Horak I and Stoltz H (2010) Ticks. Tick Identification. Pretoria: University of Pretoria, Faculty of Veterinary Science, 58pp. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mans BJ, de Klerk D, Pienaar R, Castro MH and Latif AA (2012) The mitochondrial genomes of Nuttalliella namaqua (Ixodoidea: Nuttalliellidae) and Argas africolumbae (Ixodoidea: Argasidae): estimation of divergence dates for the major tick lineages and reconstruction of ancestral blood-feeding characteristics. PLoS One 7, e4946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mans BJ, Featherston J, Kvas M, Pillay KA, de Klerk DG, Pienaar R, de Castro MH, Schwan TG, Lopez JE, Teel P, Pérez de León AA, Sonenshine DE, Egekwu NI, Bakkes DK, Heyne H, Kanduma EG, Nyangiwe N, Bouattour A and Latif AA (2019) Argasid and ixodid systematics: implications for soft tick evolution and systematics, with a new argasid species list. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 10, 219–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mans BJ, Kelava S, Pienaar R, Featherston J, de Castro MH, Quetglas J, Reeves WK, Durden LA, Miller MM, Laverty TM, Shao R, Takano A, Kawabata H, Moustafa MAM, Nakao R, Matsuno K, Greay TL, Evasco KL, Barker D and Barker SC (2021) Nuclear (18S–28S rRNA) and mitochondrial genome markers of Carios (Carios) vespertilionis (Argasidae) support Carios Latreille, 1796 as a lineage embedded in the Ornithodorinae: re-classification of the Carios sensu Klompen and Oliver (1993) clade into its respective subgenera. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 12, 101688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Murray A (1877) Economic Entomology. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 190–207. [Google Scholar]
  51. Neumann LG (1899) Révision de la famille des ixodidés (3e mémoire). Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France 12, 107–294. [Google Scholar]
  52. Neumann LG (1910) Description de deux nouvelles espèces d'Ixodinae. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 53, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  53. Neumann LG (1911) Ixodidae. Das Tierreich 26, 1–169. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nowak-Chmura M (2012) Teratological changes in tick morphology in ticks feeding on exotic reptiles. Journal of Natural History 46, 911–921. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nuttall GHF, Warburton C, Cooper WF and Robinson LE (1911) Ticks. A Monograph of the Ixodoidea, Part 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  56. Peñalver E, Arillo A, Delclòs X, Peris D, Grimaldi DA, Anderson SR, Nascimbene PC and Pérez-de la Fuente R (2017) Ticks parasitized feathered dinosaurs as revealed by Cretaceous amber assemblages. Nature Communications 8, 1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Poinar GO Jr. (2018) Burmese amber: evidence of Gondwanan origin and Cretaceous dispersion. Historical Biology 31, 1304–1309. [Google Scholar]
  58. Poinar GO Jr. and Brown AE (2003) A new genus of hard ticks in Cretaceous Burmese amber (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae). Systematic Parasitology 54, 199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Poinar GO Jr. and Buckley R (2008) Compluriscutula vetulum (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae), a new genus and species of hard tick from Lower Cretaceous Burmese amber. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 110, 445–450. [Google Scholar]
  60. Price MA (1958) A new species of tick from the Trans-Pecos region of Texas. Journal of Parasitology 4, 649–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rauhut OWM, Heyng AM, López-Arbarello A and Hecker A (2012) A new rhynchocephalian from the Late Jurassic of Germany with a dentition that is unique amongst tetrapods. PLoS One 7, e46839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Reuter ER (1909) Morphologie und Ontogenie der Acariden mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Pediculopsis graminum (E. Reut.). Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae 36, 1–288. [Google Scholar]
  63. Roberts FHS (1953) The Australian Species of Aponomma and Amblyomma (Ixodoidea). Yeerongpilly, Queensland: Division of Animal Health and Production, C.S.I.R.O., Veterinary Parasitology Laboratory, 159pp. [Google Scholar]
  64. Roberts FHS (1964) Further observations on the Australian species of Aponomma and Amblyomma with descriptions of the nymphs of Amblyomma morelliae (L. Koch) and Amb. loculosum Neumann (Acarina: Ixodidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 12, 288–313. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ross AJ (2021) Burmese (Myanmar) amber taxa, on-line supplement v.2021.1. 27pp. Available at http://www.nms.ac.uk/explore/stories/natural-world/burmese-amber/.
  66. Ross AJ, Mellish C, York P and Crighton B (2010) Burmese amber. In Penney D (ed.), Biodiversity of Fossils in Amber from the Major World Deposits. Manchester: Siri Scientific Press, pp. 208–235. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sands AF, Apanaskevich DA, Matthee S, Horak IG, Harrison A, Karim S, Mohammad MK, Mumcuoglu KY, Rajakaruna RS, Santos-Silva MM and Matthee CA (2017) Effects of tectonics and large scale climatic changes on the evolutionary history of Hyalomma ticks. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 114, 153–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Saratsiotis A (1972) Contribution a l’étude morphologique et biologique du genre Aponomma Neumann, 1899 (Acariens, Ixodidea). Acarologia 13, 476–494. [Google Scholar]
  69. Schachat SR, Robbins RG and Goddard J (2018) Color patterning in hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 55, 1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Schulze P (1935) Zur Kenntnis der Zeckengattung Aponomma Neum. Zoologischer Anzeiger 112, 327–331. [Google Scholar]
  71. Schulze P (1936) Neue und wenig bekannte Amblyommen und Aponommen aus Afrika, Südamerika, Indien, Borneo und Australien (Ixodidae). Parasitenkunde 8, 619–637. [Google Scholar]
  72. Selden PA and Ren D (2017) A review of Burmese amber arachnids. Journal of Arachnology 45, 324–343. [Google Scholar]
  73. Shi G-H, Grimaldi DA, Harlow GE, Wang J, Yang M-C, Lei W-Y, Li Q and Li X-H (2012) Age constraints on Burmese amber based on U–Pb dating of zircons. Cretaceous Research 37, 155–163. [Google Scholar]
  74. Smith RDA and Ross AJ (2018) Amberground pholadid bivalve borings and inclusions in Burmese amber: implications for proximity of resin-producing forests to brackish waters, and the age of the amber. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 107, 239–247. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sonenshine D and Roe RM (eds) (2013) Biology of Ticks, 2nd Edn. Bands 1–2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  76. Theiler G (1945a) Ticks in the South African Zoological Survey Collection. Part III. The ornate Aponommas. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry 20, 165–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Theiler G (1945b) Ticks in the South African Zoological Survey Collection. Part IV. The inornate Aponommas. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry 20, 179–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Voltzit OV (2007) A review of Neotropical Amblyomma species (Acari: Ixodidae). Acarina 15, 3–134. [Google Scholar]
  79. Voltzit OV and Keirans JE (2002) A review of Asian Amblyomma species (Acari, Ixodida, Ixodidae). Acarina 10, 95–136. [Google Scholar]
  80. Voltzit OV and Keirans JE (2003) A review of African Amblyomma species (Acari, Ixodida, Ixodidae). Acarina 11, 135–214. [Google Scholar]
  81. Westerweel J, Roprech P, Licht A, Dupont-Nivet G, Win Z, Poblete F, Ruffet G, Swe HH, Thi MK and Aung DW (2019) Burma Terrane part of the Trans-Tethyan arc during collision with India according to palaeomagnetic data. Nature Geoscience 12, 863–868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wu H, Li L and Ding M (2018) The first cyclaxyrid beetle from Upper Cretaceous Burmese amber (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Cyclaxyridae). Cretaceous Research 91, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  83. Zharkov SD, Dubinina HV, Alekseev AN and Jensen PM (2000) Anthropogenic pressure and changes in Ixodes tick populations in the Baltic region of Russia and Denmark. Acarina 8, 137–141. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182022001585.

S0031182022001585sup001.docx (130.9KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary files).


Articles from Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES