Abstract
Efficient and accurate termination is required for gene transcription in all living organisms1,2. Cellular RNA polymerases (RNAP) in both bacteria and eukaryotes can terminate their transcription through a factor-independent termination pathway (called intrinsic termination transcription in bacteria)3,4, in which RNAP recognizes terminator sequences, stops nucleotide addition, and releases nascent RNA spontaneously. Here we report a set of single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structures of E. coli transcription intrinsic termination complexes representing key intermediate states of the event. The structures show how RNAP pauses at terminator sequences, how the terminator RNA hairpin folds inside RNAP, and how RNAP rewinds the transcription bubble to release RNA and then DNA. These macromolecular snapshots define a structural mechanism for bacterial intrinsic termination and a pathway for RNA release and DNA collapse relevant for factor-independent termination by all RNA polymerases.
Genomic DNA is composed of functional genes transcribed to RNAs with defined 5′ and 3′ boundaries. The 5′ boundary is defined by a promoter, from which RNAP initiates RNA synthesis5. The 3′ boundary is defined by a terminator, at which RNAP stops transcription and releases the nascent RNA1,2,6,7. Efficient and accurate termination is required for gene transcription in all living organisms to ensure precise control of transcription units and to define the 3′ boundary of RNA transcripts1,2. Programmed transcription termination of RNAP occurs by two pathways, factor-independent (or intrinsic) and factor-dependent termination. Intrinsic termination requires only interactions of RNA and DNA with RNAP and can be modulated by transcription factors3,4,7,8. Intrinsic termination is prevalent in viruses and bacteria and used in eukaryotes by RNAPIII3,4,9.
The intrinsic terminator sequences in bacteria comprise a G/C-rich inverted repeat immediately followed by a stretch of thymidine that encodes an RNA with a G/C-rich terminator hairpin immediately followed by a uridine tract10,11. Genetic, biochemical, and single-molecule studies all suggest that intrinsic termination occurs via three sequential intermediates: (i) a pause state when RNAP pauses at the terminator in response the rU–dA hybrid and preceding G-rich sequence that are thought to inhibit tDNA translocation 12-14; (ii) a hairpin-nucleation state when the RNA hairpin partially folds into RNAP; and (iii) a hairpin-completion state when the RNA hairpin completes folding and releases nascent RNA aided by the weak rU–dA base pairs. However, how the compact terminator sequence pauses, destabilizes, and dissociates RNAP remains elusive. To address the questions, we determined a set of cryo-EM structures representing the key intermediate states formed during intrinsic termination.
RNAP pauses at the terminator sequence
RNAP first pauses at the −2/−1 positions (−1 corresponds to the position of the RNA 3′ end) of intrinsic terminators independent of the terminator hairpin to begin intrinsic termination4,12. To study the structural mechanism of the terminator-induced pause, we reconstituted a paused transcription termination complex (TTC-pause) using E. coli RNAP core enzyme and a nucleic-acid scaffold that comprises a nascent RNA with λtR2 terminator sequence but lacking the upstream half of the hairpin stem (Fig. 1a). The TTC-pause structure was determined at 3.6-Å resolution using single-particle cryo-EM (Extended Data Fig. 1, Extended Data Table 1). The cryo-EM map of TTC-pause shows unambiguous signals for ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides within and near the transcription bubble, including the 10-bp RNA–DNA hybrid, the 10-nt single-stranded non-template DNA (ntDNA), the 12-bp downstream double-stranded (dsDNA), and 3-bp of the upstream dsDNA (Fig. 1b, c, Extended Data Fig. 1h, Supplementary Video 1).
The RNA–DNA hybrid of TTC-pause adopts a half-translocated state, an off-pathway state that has been reported previously in paused transcription complexes13-15 and differs from the post-translocated state seen in ECs reconstituted on similar scaffolds with non-pause sequences19. In the half-translocated state, the RNA strand has translocated by 1-nt step from the pre-translocation state but the next template strand DNA (tDNA) nucleotide remains base-paired in the downstream dsDNA (Fig. 1d, Extended Data Fig. 2c, Supplementary Video 1). This bp is unwound and untranslocated except for slight positional shift of backbone phosphates (Extended Data Fig. 2c). Half-translocation results in a tilted RNA–DNA hybrid and an empty NTP-binding site (i+1 site) lacking the template nucleotide for base-pairing to the incoming NTP (Fig. 1d). A survey of 100 native intrinsic terminators shows that intrinsic terminators resemble the consensus sequence for elemental pausing at two out of the three key positions (S−10U−1 vs. S−10Y−1G+1; Fig. 1e, Extended Data Fig. 2a, b)11,16,17. We infer that the sequences at the upstream and downstream edges of the transcription bubble (S−10, U−1) likely account for formation of the half-translocated conformation of TTC-pause complex by inhibiting tDNA translocation18,19.
We also observed a global conformational change of RNAP involving multiple structural modules in TTC-pause compared with the normal transcription elongation complex (EC)19. The clamp module of RNAP rotates along an axis parallel to the bridge helix. The rotation movement of clamp module resembles the ‘swivel’ movement observed in the hairpin-stabilized paused elongation complex (PEC)13,14,18, but it only reaches halfway to the fully swiveled position (Fig. 1f). However, different from the swivel movement in the hairpin-stabilized PEC complex, the RNAP-β lobe/SI1 module in TTC-pause moves slightly towards the RNAP main cleft, likely due to unique interactions between RNAP and ntDNA of the transcription bubble (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Video 1). These movements of structural modules in TTC-pause likely accommodate the slightly shifted downstream dsDNA in the downstream dsDNA channel and stabilize the half-translocated RNA–DNA hybrid in the main cleft (Extended Data Fig. 2c, d).
Our cryo-EM map of TTC-pause revealed a novel path of the single-stranded ntDNA in the transcription bubble across the RNAP main cleft. The ntDNA was accommodated in the upper floor of the main cleft and was separated from the active-site tunnel by the RNAP-β′ rudder loop and fork loop 2 (Fig. 1c, Extended Data Fig. 2e). Eight nucleotides of the ntDNA form a continuous base stack that starts upstream at the RNAP-β′ coiled-coil (Fig. 1g, Extended Data Fig. 2e), travels across the cleft to the RNAP-β protrusion and lobe, and follows fork loop 2 to reach the downstream dsDNA (Extended Data Fig. 2e). The −4A is flipped out ~180° from this continuous base stack. The backbone phosphates of the stacked nucleotides are stabilized by polar contacts with RNAP residues β′R271, β′R297, βR470, and βR473; residue βW183 supports the 8-nt base stack and separates it from the downstream dsDNA (Extended Data Fig. 2f). We anticipate similar interactions between RNAP and the natural ntDNA in a complementary transcription bubble because the protein–DNA interactions are sequence non-specific (see below).
The interaction between RNAP and the −4 nucleotide is notable. The flipped out −4 nucleotide inserts into a protein pocket (NT–4 pocket) located in the gap between RNAP β protrusion and lobe (Fig. 1g). A pyrimidine base was also shown occupying the same pocket in previously reported structures20, suggesting the pocket accommodates bases sequence-non-specifically. In our structure, the A–4 base was sandwiched between residues βR180 and βV469; and the N1 atom of the adenine moiety makes a H-bond with βR465 (Fig. 1g, Extended Data Fig. 2f). To test for potential effects of the pocket interaction on intrinsic termination, we measured the termination efficiency of RNAP derivatives bearing substitutions in the pocket at three different terminators. The results revealed no obvious effects on termination efficiency of disruption of either the stacking interaction (βR180A/βV469A) or H-bond interaction (βR465A) (Extended Data Fig. 3a-f). Disruption of the pocket interaction also had no effect on transcriptional pausing at a hairpin-less λPR terminator (Extended Data Fig. 3g). Although no significant role in intrinsic termination was found, the pocket interaction might play roles in other stages of transcription20.
RNA hairpin forms in RNA exit channel
The RNA hairpin of intrinsic terminators is thought to start folding in the RNA exit channel when RNAP pauses at terminators, a stage named hairpin nucleation12,21. To trap the hairpin-nucleation complex of transcription termination (TTC-hairpin), we incubated the TTC-pause complex with an antisense RNA10 (asRNA10) to form a 10-bp RNA duplex with the nascent RNA that mimics the upstream part of the hairpin stem (−20 to −11) and determined a TTC-hairpin structure at 3.1 Å resolution (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 4, Extended Data Table 1). The cryo-EM map of TTC-hairpin revealed clear and sharp signals for the transcription bubble. The RNA–DNA hybrid adopts the same half-translocated conformation as in TTC-pause and the ntDNA nucleotides stack together and make interactions with RNAP essentially the same as in TTC-pause (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 5a). The cryo-EM map of TTC-hairpin shows unambiguous signal for the 14-bp downstream dsDNA, the 3-bp upstream dsDNA, and, most importantly, the 10-bp dsRNA in the RNA exit channel (Fig. 2b, c, Extended Data Fig. 4e, Supplementary Video 2). These features indicate we successfully trapped the TTC-hairpin complex of intrinsic termination.
The 10-bp dsRNA was tightly accommodated in the RNA exit channel by RNAP β′ dock, β C-terminal helix region (β CTR), β′ zinc-binding domain (β′ ZBD), and β flap (Fig. 2d), consistent with the important roles of these elements in intrinsic termination22,23. The phosphate backbones of the RNA hairpin were held by RNAP polar residues in the RNA exit channel, including β′K66, β′K76, β′R77, β′Q1256, β′K395, β′K398, βN856, βK890, βK914, and βR919 (Fig. 2e). The innermost base pair of the RNA duplex reaches the bottom of the RNA exit channel. The −11G of the nascent RNA makes a base-stack interaction with βL1253 and the sugar moiety of the asRNA −11C fits into a shallow pocket of β′ ZBD (Fig. 2f). The RNA duplex in our structure of TTC-hairpin lacks the ssRNA upstream of the hairpin stem, which can be routed out of the RNA exit channel through a positively charged groove without interfering with the hairpin stem in the RNA exit channel (Extended Data Fig. 5b). Further extension of the RNA hairpin stem into the active-center cleft was stopped by β Sw3, β′ ZBD, and β′ lid (Fig. 2g). Most of these features of the hairpin stem closely match those observed for the hairpin-stabilized hisPEC even though the TTC-hairpin stem is extended 1 bp closer to the RNA–DNA hybrid13,14.
The formation of an RNA duplex in TTC-hairpin causes a global conformational change of RNAP. The RNA duplex enlarges the RNA exit channel by stretching the four surrounding structural elements (Fig. 2h), likely triggering a global conformational change of RNAP structure modules, including further swiveling of the clamp module and outward rotation of the protrusion/lobe/SI1 module (Fig. 2i, Supplementary Video 2). The net result of such global rearrangement widens the main cleft and secures the hairpin in the RNA exit channel. Moreover, the fully swiveled conformation prevents trigger loop from refolding and further stabilizes the half-translocated RNA-DNA hybrid13,24. In short, our TTC-hairpin structure shows that the RNA duplex in the RNA exit channel induces further conformational changes of RNAP compared with TTC-pause to inhibit nucleotide addition, stabilize the pause, and likely to prepare for subsequent completion of RNA hairpin.
The completion of RNA hairpin requires melting of at least two upstream base pairs of RNA-DNA hybrid 25. Our cryo-EM structure of TTC-hairpin provides a structural clue for how the first base pair of the RNA–DNA hybrid is disrupted. In the TTC-hairpin structure, the half-translocated RNA–DNA hybrid shifts each template nucleotide towards upstream from their respective positions in the pre-translocation state (Fig. 2j). As a result, the −10 nucleotide of tDNA shifts ~1-bp register out of the RNAP active-center cleft to a new position under the small tunnel formed by the rudder and lid loops (Fig. 2k, Extended Data Fig. 5c, d). This new location allows unpairing of tDNA with the −10 nucleotide of the nascent RNA and its flipping through the tunnel to pair with the −10 nucleotide of ntDNA (Extended Data Fig. 5e, Supplementary Video 3). Rewinding of this upstream base pair of the transcription bubble would weaken the next base-pair in the RNA–DNA hybrid due to loss of stacking interactions, thus enabling its disruption and lowering the energy barrier to RNA hairpin completion. The base pair at the −10 position shows the weakest map signals among the nucleotides of the RNA–DNA hybrid (Extended Data Fig. 5f), indicative of its high flexibility necessary for spontaneous unwinding.
DNA rewinding promotes RNA release
The last stage of transcription termination involves disruption of RNA–DNA hybrid, completion of RNA hairpin, rewinding of transcription bubble, and release of RNA and DNA4,12,25-28. To trap intermediates of the last stage of intrinsic termination, we took advantage of asRNA-induced termination (Fig. 3a)4. The in vitro transcription termination assay suggests that, upon challenge with asRNA12 that could form an RNA duplex with nascent RNA mimicking RNA hairpin completion, RNAP began to release nascent RNA in 30 seconds and released most of the nascent RNA at 5 minutes (Fig. 3b). Therefore, we challenged the TTC-pause complex with excess amount of 12-nt asRNA and vitrified the reaction mixture after 3-minute incubation, followed by cryo-EM data collection. A cryo-EM map was reconstructed at 3.5 Å from 54,471 particles (19% of total particles) after two rounds of 3D classification (Extended Data Fig. 6, Extended Data Table 1). The cryo-EM density map for this novel complex (TTC-release) shows clear signals for 14-bp dsDNA in the downstream DNA channel, 6-bp upstream dsDNA located between the β′ clamp helices and β protrusion, and a partially rewound transcription bubble (from upstream) with 5 nt of ntDNA remaining single-stranded (Fig. 3c, d, Extended Data Fig. 6h, Supplementary Video 4). The cryo-EM map shows no signal in the RNA-exit channel and weak disconnected signal in the active-center cleft that is likely from the non-specific rebinding of released RNA (Fig. 3d)29. The map features suggest that we have trapped an intermediate state of DNA–RNA release (TTC-release), in which RNA is released from the RNA exit channel, the transcription bubble is disrupted, and the ntDNA and tDNA of the transition bubble are partially rewound (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Video 4).
The upstream dsDNA of TTC-release undergoes a radical conformation change compared with that of TTC-hairpin. The helix axis of the upstream dsDNA of TTC-release rotates ~75° in an upward direction compared with that of TTC-hairpin (Extended Data Fig. 7a). The rotation of the dsDNA relocates the 6-bp upstream dsDNA (−17 to −12) away from RNAP and thus becomes disordered in the structure (Extended Data Fig. 7b). The rewound 5-bp dsDNA (−10 to −6) were loosely restrained by β protrusion, β′ CC, and β′ rudder (Fig. 3f). Further rewinding of the upstream dsDNA is stopped by the β lobe domain and requires cleft opening to a greater extent (Fig. 3f). The 5-nt single-stranded ntDNA remains in the same location as in TTC-pause and TTC-hairpin (Fig. 3e). The 14-bp dsDNA of TTC-release locates at the downstream dsDNA channel and makes interactions with RNAP as it does in an EC (Extended Data Fig. 7c). Structural comparison shows that the RNAP clamp and lobe adopt the closed conformation seen in canonical EC (Extended Data Fig. 7d), consistent with the previous findings that clamp opening is required for DNA release30. In short, our TTC-release structure suggests that DNA duplex remains bound to RNAP in a partially rewound form after RNA release.
The TTC-release complex also shows that transcription bubble rewinding is accompanied by hairpin completion and release of the nascent RNA31,32. The structure of the TTC-hairpin complex reveals the −10 nucleotide of tDNA is ready to unpair with RNA and to rewind with the −10 nucleotide of ntDNA (Fig. 2j, 2k, Extended Data Fig. 5c-e). These results lead us to hypothesize that rewinding of the transcription bubble triggers the subsequent steps of hairpin completion and RNA release. To test our hypothesis, we measured termination efficiency at λtR2 with pre-melted regions at various positions close to the termination site (Fig. 3g, Extended Data Fig. 8a). The results show that pre-melting the downstream half of the transcription bubble (−5 to −1; D5) has no effect on the termination at all, but pre-melting the upstream half of the transcription bubble (−10 to −6; U5) completely abolished termination (Fig. 3g). This result supports the ideas that rewinding of transcription bubble is required for intrinsic termination and that the process initiates from the upstream end, consistent with a previous report32. We next performed a more refined mapping to define the minimal requirements of bubble rewinding for efficient termination. Pre-melting two base pairs in the middle of the transcription bubble (−7/−6) had little effect. Moving the 2-bp pre-melted region upstream gradually decreased the termination efficiency. Strikingly, pre-melting the first two base pairs (−10/−9) completely abolished termination, highlighting the crucial role of rewinding the first two base pairs (−10/−9) during intrinsic termination (Fig. 3g). The same results were obtained using the ϕt500 terminator sequence (Extended Data Fig. 8b). These results support our hypothesis that rewinding the transcription bubble is an important step for intrinsic termination, likely through reducing the energetic barriers for hairpin completion and RNA release. We also noticed that termination occurred, albeit with low efficiency, in response to asRNAs (asRNA −11 and −10) that only form a duplex in the RNA exit channel and do not disrupt the RNA–DNA hybrid (Extended Data Fig. 8c)33. This result suggests that rewinding the transcription bubble is sufficient to induce termination even without hairpin extension, consistent with bubble rewinding beginning the RNA release process. Together, our cryo-EM structures and in vitro transcription results suggest that rewinding the upstream two base pairs of transcription bubble is a requisite for subsequent RNA hairpin completion and RNA release.
An intriguing implication of our structures is that the nascent RNA dissociates before RNAP releases dsDNA, consistent with evidence that terminated RNAP can remain associated with and slide on DNA after termination34,35. We tested this idea by measuring the rates of RNA and DNA release from TTC in physiologically relevant solutes using a scaffold that provided all RNAP–DNA contacts (Fig. 3h). After addition of asRNA to trigger termination, RNA was released ~5 times faster than DNA. This result indicates that the binary RNAP–DNA complex survives after RNA release at the post-termination stage. This binary complex may dissociate more slowly in vivo where sliding RNAP would not immediately encounter a DNA end.
Discussion
On the basis of our cryo-EM structures and biochemical evidence, we propose a detailed model for bacterial intrinsic termination (Fig. 4, Extended Data Fig. 9): (i) RNAP pauses at the terminator site containing elemental pause-like sequence motif (S−10U−1)4,12, where it adopts the ‘half-swiveled’ conformation that accommodates a half-translocated RNA-DNA hybrid in the active-site cleft; (ii) initial folding of terminator hairpin enlarges the RNA exit channel12,21, induces a ‘full-swivel’ RNAP conformation13,14,18, and weakens the upstream RNA–DNA base-pair interactions; (iii) RNAP rewinds the two base pairs of the upstream transcription bubble and clears the energetic barrier for subsequent RNA hairpin completion31,32; (iv) the terminator hairpin completes formation in the RNA exit channel by extracting the RNA out the exit channel either by ‘hybrid shearing’ (RNA moves but tDNA does not)26, by pulling the RNA–DNA hybrid upstream by ‘forward translocation’ (the downstream duplex melts without nucleotide addition to RNA)26,27, or by extending the hairpin stem into the active-site cleft by ‘hairpin invasion’ (RNAP clamp opens to allow hairpin extension)12,25,28,36 – rewinding of the transcription bubble propagates concurrently with RNA hairpin completion; and (v) RNAP releases the nascent RNA but retains the partially rewound DNA34-36. RNAP may either slide on genomic DNA or finally dissociate DNA spontaneously or aided by pro-termination factors7,34,35,37-39.
In summary, our cryo-EM structures of transcription termination complexes reveal how bacterial RNAP pauses at intrinsic terminator sequence, how a terminator hairpin nucleates its folding in the RNA exit channel to weaken the RNA–DNA hybrid, how RNAP rewinds the transcription bubble to allow completion of the terminator hairpin and release of nascent RNA, and how RNAP retains the partially rewound dsDNA. The structures provide structural mechanisms for bacterial intrinsic termination. The “DNA rewinding-triggered RNA release” mechanism provides clues for factor-independent termination at hairpin-less terminator sequences by eukaryotic RNA polymerase III40,41.
Methods
Plasmid construction
Plasmid pET-28a-TEV-Ec-σ70 (Supplementary Table 1) was constructed by inserting the E. coli σ70 gene amplified using Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd) from E. coli genomic DNA into a modified pET-28a plasmid carrying the TEV protease cleavage site by a homogenous recombination method (pEASY®-Basic Seamless Cloning and Assembly Kit, Transgen Biotech, Inc.). Derivatives of pRL706 were constructed by primer-mediated, site-directed mutagenesis using NEB Q5 site-directed mutagenesis reagents.
E. coli RNAP core enzyme
E. coli RNAP core enzyme for cryo-EM and most in vitro assays was over-expressed from E. coli BL21(DE3) (Novo protein, Inc.) carrying pEcABC and pCDF-Ec rpoZ (Supplementary Table 1) and purified as described42. E. coli RNAP core enzyme used in experiments shown in Fig. 3h and Extended Data Fig. 8c was purified as described previously43.
E. coli RNAP core enzyme with substitutions in the β subunit used in experiments shown in Extended Data Fig. 3 was purified using β-subunit overexpression from pRL706 derivatives (Supplementary Table 1). Each plasmid was independently transformed into E. coli strain RL1204 (Table S1) and a single colony was inoculated into 30 mL LB + 100 μg carbenicillin/mL and grown overnight at 37 °C. The saturated cell culture was added to 1 L fresh LB + 100 μg carbenicillin/mL and grown at 37 °C with adequate aeration by orbital shaking in a Fernbach flask until apparent OD600 reached 0.2. β subunit overexpression was induced by adding IPTG (Gold Biotechnology) to 1 mM and cell growth was monitored until apparent OD600 reached 0.9. The cells were harvested and homogenized by sonication in 30 mL Lysis Buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 5% v/v glycerol, 233 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 μg PMSF/mL, 1 tablet of protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), and 10 mM DTT). After removing cell debris by centrifugation (27000 × g, 15 min, 4 °C), DNA binding proteins including target RNAPs were precipitated by addition of polyethyleneimine (PEI, Sigma-Aldrich) to 0.6% (w/v) final and stirred for at least 10 min. After centrifugation (11000 × g, 15 min, 4 °C), the protein pellet was resuspended in 25 mL of PEI wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 5% v/v glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 μM ZnCl2, 500 mM NaCl) to remove non-target proteins. After centrifugation (11000 × g, 15 min, 4 °C), RNAP was eluted from the pellet into 25 mL PEI Elution Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 5% v/v glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 μM ZnCl2, 1 M NaCl). The crude extract of RNAP was subjected to sequential FPLC purifications using Ni2+-affinity (HisTrap FF 5 mL, Cytiva), followed by purification using a Heparin column (HiTrap FF 5 mL, Cytiva). The purified RNAPs were dialyzed into RNAP Storage Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 25% v/v glycerol, 100 mM NaCl, 100 μM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 μM ZnCl2, 10 mM DTT). Samples were aliquoted, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in −80 °C.
E. coli σ70
E. coli σ70 was over-expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells (Novo protein, Inc.) carrying pET28a-TEV-Ec-σ70 (Supplementary Table 1). Protein expression was induced with 0.3 mM IPTG at 18 °C for 14 h when OD600 reached to 0.6-0.8. Cell pellet was lysed in lysis buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 500 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.1 mM PMSF) using an Avestin EmulsiFlex-C3 cell disrupter (Avestin, Inc.). The lysate was centrifuged (16,000 × g; 50 min; 4 °C) and the supernatant was loaded on to a 2 mL column packed with Ni-NTA agarose beads (Smart-Lifesciences, Inc.). The bound proteins were washed by lysis buffer B containing 20 mM imidazole and eluted with the lysis buffer B containing 400 mM imidazole. The eluted fractions were supplemented with TEV protease and transferred to a dialysis bag to exchange buffer to 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 150 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol. The sample was reloaded onto the Ni-NTA column, and the tag-free protein was retrieved from the flow-through fraction. The sample was diluted, loaded onto a Q HP column (HiPrep Q HP 16/10, Cytiva) and eluted with a salt gradient of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 150 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM DTT) and buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 500 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM DTT). The fractions containing target proteins were collected, concentrated to 5.2 mg/mL, and stored at −80 °C.
E. coli σ70 used in experiments shown in Extended Data Figs. 3, 8c was purified as described previously43.
E. coli RNAP holoenzyme
E. coli RNAP core (3 μM, final concentration) and σ70 (12 μM, final concentration) were incubated in 0.5 mL 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 100 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM DTT for 2 h at 4 °C. The reaction mixture was applied to a Superdex 200 10/300 column (Cytiva) equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 100 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM DTT. Fractions containing RNAP holoenzyme were collected and concentrated to ~5 mg/mL, and stored at −80 °C.
Nucleic-acid scaffolds.
Nucleic-acid scaffolds (Supplementary Table 1) for cryo-EM study of E. coli TTC-pause and TTC-hairpin were prepared as follows: nontemplate-strand DNA (5’-GGCGTACGGAAAAATAACACGGCGAATACCC-3’; 0.3 mM, final concentration; Sangon Biotech), template-strand DNA (5’-GGGTATTCGCCGTGAATAAAAAGGGTACGCC-3’; 0.33 mM, final concentration; Sangon Biotech) and RNA (5’-GCGUCGCAGGCCUUUUUAUU-3’; 0.39 mM, final concentration; GenScript Biotech Corp.) in 50 μL annealing buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, and 10 mM MgCl2) were heated for 5 min at 95°C, cooled to 22 °C in 2 °C steps with 30 s per step using a thermal cycler.
Nucleic-acid scaffold (Supplementary Table 1) for cryo-EM study of E. coli TTC-release was prepared as follows: template-strand DNA (5’-GGGTATTCGCCGTGAATAAAAAGGGTACGCC-3’; 0.39 mM, final concentration; Sangon Biotech) and RNA (5’-Cy5-ACGCGUCGCAGGCCUUUUUAUU-3’; 0.3 mM, final concentration; GenScript Biotech Corp.) in 50 μL annealing buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, and 10 mM MgCl2) were heated for 5 min at 95°C, cooled to 22 °C in 2 °C steps with 30 s per step using a thermal cycler.
For experiments shown in Fig. 3g, Extended Data Figs. 3, 8c, DNA and RNA oligos (Supplementary Table 1, Extended Data Fig. 8c) were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT; Coralville, IA) and were purified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE; 15% 19:1 acrylamide: bisacrylamide, 45 mM Tris-borate, pH 8.3, 1.25 mM Na2EDTA, 8M urea) before use, unless otherwise stated. [γ-32P]ATP, [α-32P]UTP and [α-32P]GTP were obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences; rNTPs, from Promega (Madison, WI, USA); and 3’deoxy GTP (3′dGTP) from Jena Bioscience.
Cryo-EM data collection and processing: E. coli TTC-pause
E. coli RNAP core enzyme (20 μM, final concentration) and the nucleic-acid scaffold (26 μM, final concentration) were incubated in 0.5 mL 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM DTT at room temperature for 50 min. The mixture was applied to a Superdex 200 10/300 column (Cytiva) equilibrated in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM DTT. Fractions containing TTC-pause complex were collected and concentrated to 13 mg/mL.
The freshly purified E. coli TTC-pause at 13 mg/mL was incubated with 3-([3-cholamidopropyl] dimethylammonio)-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPSO, 8 mM, final concentration; Hampton Research Inc.) prior to grid preparation. The complex (3 μL) was subsequently applied on a glow-discharged C-flat CF-1.2/1.3 400 mesh holey carbon grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences), blotted with Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI), and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane with 95% chamber humidity at 10 °C.
The data were collected on a 300 keV Titan Krios (FEI) equipped with a K2 Summit direct electron detector (Gatan) at National Center for Protein Sciences Shanghai. A total of 1,796 images were recorded using the Serial EM44 in super-resolution counting mode with a pixel size of 1.0 Å, and a dose rate of 8 electrons/pixel/s. Movies were recorded at 200 ms/frame for 7.6 s (38 frames total) and defocus range was varied between −1.2 μm and −2.2 μm. Frames of individual movies were aligned using MotionCor245, and contrast-transfer-function estimations were performed using CTFFIND446. About 1,000 particles were picked and subjected to 2D classification in RELION 3.047. The resulting distinct two-dimensional classes were served as templates for particle auto-picking and 203,216 particles were picked out. The resulting particles were subjected to 2D classification in RELION 3.0 by specifying 100 classes47. Poorly-populated classes were removed. We used a 50-Å low-pass-filtered map calculated from structure of E. coli RNAP core enzyme (PDB: 6ALF) as the starting reference model for 3D classification (N=3). The final concentration maps calculated from 132,648 particles were obtained through 3D auto-refinement, CTF-refinement, Bayesian polishing, and post-processing in RELION 3.0. Gold-standard Fourier-shell-correlation analysis indicated a mean map resolution of 3.58 Å (Extended Data Fig. 1)
The model of RNAP core enzyme from the cryo-EM structure of E. coli TEC (PDB: 6ALF) was manually fit into the cryo-EM density map using Chimera48. Rigid body and real-space refinement was performed in Coot49 and Phenix50.
Cryo-EM data collection and processing: E. coli TTC-hairpin
The freshly purified E. coli TTC-pause complex (13 mg/mL, 33 μM, final concentration) and antisense RNA (asRNA10, 330 μM, final concentration) were incubated in 30 μL 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM DTT for 3 h at 4°C. The sample was vitrified by the same procedure as the TTC-pause complex.
The data were collected on a 300 keV Titan Krios (FEI) equipped with a K2 Summit direct electron detector (Gatan) at center of Electron Microscopy, Zhejiang University. A total of 3,888 images were recorded using the Serial EM44 in counting mode with a pixel size of 1.307 Å, and a dose rate of 9.9 electrons/pixel/s. Movies were recorded at 250 ms/frame for 10 s (40 frames total) and defocus range was varied between −1.8 μm and −2.6 μm. Frames of individual movies were aligned using MotionCor245, and contrast-transfer-function estimations were performed using CTFFIND446. About 1,548 particles were picked and subjected to 2D classification in RELION 3.047. The resulting distinct two-dimensional classes were served as templates and a total of 1,548 particles for were picked out. The resulting particles were subjected to 2D classification in RELION 3.0 by specifying 100 classes 47. Poorly-populated classes were removed. We used a 50-Å low-pass-filtered map calculated from structure of E. coli RNAP core enzyme19 (PDB: 6ALF) as the starting reference model for 3D classification (N=4). Two same classes were combined and 360,313 particles were used for 3D auto-refinement. To resolve heterogeneity around RNA hairpin in RNA exit channel, a soft mask that excludes RNA duplex and nearby protein regions (β′ ZBD, β′ dock, β flap, β CTR) was generated in Chimera and RELION 3.0. The mask was used to make a subtracted particle stack in RELION 3.0. The subtracted particles were applied for masked 3D classification (N=6, without alignment), the best-resolved class containing obvious RNA hairpin (293,294 particles) was used for 3D auto-refinement, CTF-refinement and Bayesian polishing, Postprocessing. Gold-standard Fourier-shell-correlation analysis indicated a mean map resolution of 3.05 Å (Extended Data Fig. 4). The structural model of RNAP core enzyme from the cryo-EM structure of E. coli hisPEC (PDB: 6ASX) was manually fit into the cryo-EM density map using Chimera48. Rigid-body and real-space refinement was performed in Coot49 and Phenix50.
Cryo-EM data collection and processing: E. coli TTC-release
E. coli RNAP core enzyme (20 μM, final concentration) and nucleic-acid scaffold comprising tDNA and RNA (30 μM, final concentration) were incubated in 0.5 mL 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM DTT at room temperature for 30 min. The ntDNA (200 μM, final concentration) was subsequently added and the mixture was further incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The mixture was applied to a Superdex 200 10/300 column (Cytiva) equilibrated in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM DTT. Fractions containing TTC-pause complex were collected and concentrated to 17 mg/mL (~43 μM), then the sample mixed with CHAPSO (Hampton Research, Inc.) to a final concentration 8 mM, 430 μM (final concentration) antisense RNA12 (asRNA12) was added and the reaction was incubated for 3 min prior to grid preparation. The complex (3 μL) was quickly applied on a glow-discharged UltraAuFoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh holey Au grids (Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH), blotted with Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI), and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane with 100% chamber humidity at 22 °C.
The data were collected on a 300 keV Titan Krios (FEI) equipped with a K3 Summit direct electron detector (Gatan) at National Center for Protein Sciences Shanghai. A total of 1,355 images were recorded using the EPU using super-resolution counting mode for 2.67 s exposures in 40 frames to give a total dose of 49.65 electrons per Å2 with defocus range of −1.2 to −2.2 μm. Frames of individual movies were aligned using MotionCor245, and contrast-transfer-function estimations were performed using CTFFIND446. About 1,000 particles were picked and subjected to 2D classification in RELION 3.047. The resulting distinct two-dimensional classes were served as templates for auto-picking and a total of 592,713 particles were picked out. The resulting particles were subjected to 2D classification in RELION 3.0 by specifying 100 classes47. Poorly-populated classes were removed. We used a 50-Å low-pass-filtered map calculated from TTC-hairpin map as the starting reference model for 3D classification (N=6). Two classes were combined and 282,423 the particle numbers used for 3D auto-refinement. To resolve heterogeneity about the DNA and RNA in the main cleft, a soft map that excludes the upstream dsDNA, the transcription bubble, the RNA-DNA hybrid, the downstream dsDNA, and the β’clamp domain nearby was generated in Chimera and RELION 3.0. The mask was used to make a subtracted particle stack in RELION 3.0. The subtracted particles were applied for masked 3D classification (N=6, without alignment), the 3D class of TTC-release (54,309 particles) were used for 3D auto-refinement, CTF-refinement and Bayesian polishing, Postprocessing. Gold-standard Fourier-shell-correlation analysis indicated a mean map resolution of 3.48 Å (map A in Extended Data Fig. 6d). The structural model of RNAP core enzyme from the cryo-EM structure of E. coli hisPEC (PDB: 6ASX) was manually fit into the cryo-EM map using Chimera48. Rigid body and real-space refinement was performed in Coot49 and Phenix50. The other two major classes were also processed under the similar procedure resulting in two maps at 3.40 Å (map B and C in Extended Data Fig. 6d), both of which show little signal for the upstream dsDNA, the non-template ssDNA, and the ssRNA in the RNA exit channel, although clear signals for the downstream dsDNA and the half-translocated RNA–DNA hybrid. These features suggest that these two complexes were likely not properly assembled during complex reconstitution.
Fluorescence-detected RNA release assay
To study asRNA-induced RNA release, E. coli RNAP core enzyme (200 nM, final concentration) and TTC-release nucleic-acid scaffold (800 nM, final concentration) comprising Cy5-labelled RNA and tDNA were incubated in 300 mL transcription buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol at room temperature for 15 min. Then ntDNA (2 μM, final concentration) was subsequently added and the mixture was further incubated at room temperature for 15 min to form TTC-pause complex. The complex was immobilized on 150 mL Ni-NTA agarose beads (smart-lifesciences, Inc.) pre-washed with transcription buffer. The immobilized complex was washed with 300 mL transcription buffer for three times. The reaction mixture was aliquoted and each of the aliquot (70 μL) was supplemented with 7 mL asRNA12 (final concentration: 1 μM) to induce RNA release. For each of the aliquots, 20 mL reaction mixtures were taken out as reference of total amount of nascent RNA. The resulting reaction mixtures (50 μL) were separated into supernatant and pellet fractions by centrifugation at specified time points. Both the total and supernatant samples (20 mL) were mixed with 5 μL loading buffer (8 M urea, 20 mM EDTA, 0.025% xylene cyanol), 95 °C boiled for 5 min, and cooled down in ice for 5 min. RNA were separated by 20% urea-polyacrylamide slab gels (19:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) in 90 mM Tris-borate, pH 8.0 and 0.2 mM EDTA and analyzed by fluorescein scanning (Typhoon; GE Healthcare, Inc.).
Release assay to measure RNA and DNA rates release during intrinsic termination
The TTC release scaffold (Fig. 3a) was modified by addition of 12 downstream base pairs to eliminate any effect of RNAP–DNA-end contacts that could affect the DNA release rate (Fig. 3h). ECs were reconstituted one nucleotide upstream from the U8 termination site by incubation of 1 μM RNA21, 200 nM T DNA that was 5′ 32P-labeled by treatment with [γ-32P]ATP polynucleotide kinase, and 400 nM E. coli core RNAP in 100 μL EC buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 8.0, 50 mM KGlutamate, 10 mM MgOAc, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 μg acetylated BSA/mL and 1 mM DTT) for 5 min at 37 °C. Non-template DNA (2 μM) was added and the mixture was incubated for an additional 5 min at 37 °C. The final ratio of RNAP:RNA:T:NT was 2:5:1:10. The estimated concentration of the assembled transcription termination complex was 200 nM. Heparin (50 μg/mL) was added to the mixture to prevent core RNAP from rebinding to the scaffold after release. The RNA was extended to U8 by reaction with 2 μM [α-32P]UTP (136 Ci/mmol) yielding TTC with 5′ 32P-labeled T DNA and 3′ 32P-labeled RNA. The complex was immobilized on 20 μL of Ni-NTA agarose beads (Qiagen) with occasional pipetting. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, the immobilized complex was washed with EC buffer (five cycles of centrifugation and resuspension of the pelleted beads in 200 μL of fresh EC buffer). The washed bead-complex was resuspended in 200 μL EC buffer. One 5 μL portion was mixed with 5 μL stop buffer (8 M urea, 50 mM EDTA, 90 mM Tris-Borate buffer, pH 8.3, 0.02% bromophenol blue, 0.02% xylene cyanol) for total 0-timepoint sample. A second 5 μL portion was incubated with ATP, CTP, and 3′-dGTP (150 μM each), then combined with stop buffer as a check for TTC integrity. (Fig. 3h). The magnetic Ni-NTA beads were pulled to one side using a magnet, then 25 μL of the supernatant was passed through a nitrocellulose microfilter plate (384 wells) placed on top of a multi-well plate vacuum manifold (Operated at 20 Hg) with a receiver plate on the bottom (Pall Corporation). A portion (5 μL) of the filtrate was mixed with 5 μL stop buffer for the released 0-timepoint sample. To initiate the termination reaction and monitor RNA and DNA release, asRNA – 12mer (Fig. 3h) was added to a final concentration of 1 μM and supernatant portions (25 μL) were removed after 10, 20, 30, 60, 120 and 180 s, filtered, and combined with stop buffer as described for the 0-timepoint sample. Samples were then analyzed by denaturing PAGE (15% 19:1 acrylamide: bis-acrylamide, 45 mM Tris-borate, pH 8.3, 1.25 mM Na2EDTA, 8M urea) for 2 h at 60 W, the gel exposed on a Storage Phosphor Screen and imaged on a Typhoon PhosphoImager (GE Healthcare). The RNA and T DNA were quantified using Image J software (NIH). Released RNA and DNA were compared to the total samples to calculate fractions remaining in the TTC from triplicate reactions. These fractions vs. time were fit to a first-order dissociation rate equation with a small fraction that remained bound to the beads (recalcitrant to release) (Fig. 3h). The recalcitrant fractions (both RNA and DNA) were 0.05 for the first replicate and 0.13 for the second and third replicates. One timepoint (30 s) was lost for replicate 1.
In vitro transcription assay
DNA templates used for in vitro transcription assays contains the T5-N25 promoter, a coding region, and the λtR2 terminator. The DNA template was prepared by PCR primer extension using the single-stranded ntDNA (5’-TCATAAAAAATTTATTTGCTTTCAGGAAAATTTTTCTGTATAATAGATTCATAAATTTGAGAGAGGAGTTTAAATCCAGGCCTGCTGGTAATCGCAGGCCTTTTTATTTGGATCCCCGGGTAGAATTCG-3’; 1 μM; RuiMian) as template and tDNA (5’- CGAATTCTACCCGGGGATCCAAATAAAAAGGCCTGCGATT ACCAGCAGGCCTGGATTTA TGATCCCCGAGGAGAAGCAGAGGTACC-3’; 2 μM; Sangon Biotech) as the primer in a thermal cycler. The efficiency of primer extension was confirmed on a 1.5% agarose gel and the extended dsDNA were further purified by a Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-Tek). The pre-melted DNA templates were prepared by the same procedure using tDNA primer with non-complementary sequences at the specified positions (Fig. 3g, Extended Data Fig. 8a, b).
Reaction mixture (20 μL) in transcription buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 75 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 12.5% Glycerol, 2.5 mM DTT, and 50 μg/ml BSA) containing RNAP holoenzyme (50 nM) and DNA template (50 nM) were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. RNA synthesis was initiated by addition of 1.2 μL NTP mixture (5 μM ATP, 5 μM GTP, 0.05 μM UTP and 0.55 μM [α-32P]UTP (45 Bq/fmol), final concentration) for 10 min at 37 °C to obtain TECs halted at U25. Subsequently, 1μL Heparin (50 μg/mL; final concentration) was added to only allows single-round transcription. RNA extension was resumed by addition of 1 μL NTP mixture (5 μM ATP, 5 μM CTP, 5 μM GTP, and 5μM UTP; final concentration). Reactions were terminated by adding 5 μL loading buffer, boiled at 95 °C for 5 min, and cooled down in ice for 5 min. The RNA transcripts were separated by 12% urea-polyacrylamide slab gels (19:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) in 90 mM Tris-borate, pH 8.0 and 0.2 mM EDTA and analyzed by storage-phosphor scanning (Typhoon; GE Healthcare, Inc.).
Promoter-based template DNA sequences with a λPR promoter, C-less cassette, and wild-type or variant λtR2 or ϕt500 terminators for experiments shown in Extended Data Figs. 3, 8c were PCR-amplified using primers flanking both ends and gel-purified using Qiagen Qiaquick purification reagents. NusA protein was purified as described previously51. Core RNAP was incubated with σ70 for 30 min at 37 °C to form holo-RNAP. To initiate transcription, holo-RNAP (31.25 nM) was incubated with template DNA (25 nM), ApU (150 μM), ATP + UTP (both at 2.5 μM), and 2 μM [α-32P]GTP (54.5 Ci/mmol) in EC buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 8.0, 50 mM KGlutamate, 10 mM MgOAc, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 μg acetylated BSA/mL and 1 mM DTT) for 5 min at 37 °C to form a halted complex at A26. Transcription was then restarted by adding a mastermix containing NTP mix (A+C+G+U), Heparin and KGlutamate at a final concentration of 150 μM, 50 μg/mL and 100 mM respectively. Reactions were stopped and products were separated as described above. The termination efficiencies were calculated from three independent replicates.
For experiments shown in Extended Data Fig. 3f, ECs were reconstituted 15 nucleotides upstream from the U8 termination site by incubation of 25 nM RNA23, 50 nM T DNA, and 50 nM E. coli core RNAP in 50 μL EC buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 8.0, 50 mM KGlutamate, 10 mM MgOAc, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 μg/mL Acetylated BSA and 1 mM DTT) for 5 min at 37 °C. Non-template DNA (125 nM) was added and the mixture was incubated for an additional 5 min at 37 °C. Heparin (50 μg/mL) was added to the mixture to prevent core RNAP from rebinding to nucleic acids. The RNA was extended to A25 by a reaction with ATP + CTP (2.5 μM final for both) followed by radiolabeling to G27 by reacting with 0.037 μM [α-32P]GTP (3000 Ci/mmol). The RNA was then extended to the termination site by addition of 150 μM NTP mix.
Extended Data
Extended Data Table 1.
TTC-pause (EMDB-33996) (PDB 7YP9) |
TTC-hairpin (EMDB-33997) (PDB 7YPA) |
TTC-release (EMDB-33998) (PDB 7YPB) |
|
---|---|---|---|
Data collection and processing | |||
Magnification | 22,500 | 22,500 | 64,000 |
Voltage (kV) | 300 | 300 | 300 |
Electron exposure (e−/Å2) | 60.8 | 58.5 | 49.6 |
Defocus range (μm) | −1.2 to −2.2 | −1.8 to −2.6 | −1.2 to −2.2 |
Pixel size (Å) | 1.0 | 1.307 | 1.1 |
Symmetry imposed | C1 | C1 | C1 |
Initial particle images (no.) | 203,216 | 497,373 | 592,713 |
Final particle images (no.) | 132,648 | 294,721 | 54,471 |
Map resolution (Å) | 3.58 | 3.05 | 3.48 |
FSC threshold | 0.143 | 0.143 | 0.143 |
Map resolution range (Å) | 3-5 | 2.5-4.5 | 3-6 |
Refinement | |||
Initial model used (PDB code) | 6ALF | 6ASX | 6ASX |
Model resolution (Å) | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.4 |
FSC threshold | 0.143 | 0.143 | 0.143 |
Model resolution range (Å) | 3-5 | 2.5-4.5 | 3-6 |
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) | −112.57 | −59.23 | −90.8 |
Model composition | |||
Non-hydrogen atoms | 24,548 | 26,022 | 25,626 |
Protein residues | 3,013 | 3,129 | 3,133 |
Ligands | 2/1 | 2/1 | 2/1 |
B factors (Å2) | |||
Protein | 35.89 | 43.66 | 31.81 |
Nucleotide | 56.84 | 110.2 | 113.78 |
Ligand | 52.73 | 63.86 | 49.7 |
R.m.s. deviations | |||
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Bond angles (°) | 0.674 | 0.575 | 0.556 |
Validation | |||
MolProbity score | 1.52 | 1.27 | 1.23 |
Clashscore | 5.57 | 3.02 | 2.96 |
Poor rotamers (%) | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
Ramachandran plot | |||
Favored (%) | 96.56 | 96.94 | 97.23 |
Allowed (%) | 3.44 | 3.06 | 2.77 |
Disallowed (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS XDB29020000 (Y.Z.), National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFA0903701 (Y.Z.), Basic Research Zone Program of Shanghai JCYJ-SHFY-2022-012 (Y.Z.), Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation program (19JC1415900) (Y.Z.), and US National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH (GM38660) (R.L.). We thank Dr. Liangliang Kong, Dr. Fangfang Wang, Dr. Guangyi Li, and Dr. Jialin Duan at the cryo-EM center of NFPS in Shanghai, Dr. Shenghai Chang at the cryo-EM center of Zhejiang University.
Footnotes
Competing interests
Authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data availability
The cryo-EM map and coordinates were deposited in Protein Data Bank and Electron Microscopy Data Bank (TTC-pause: 7YP9 and EMD-33996; TTC-hairpin: 7YPA, EMD-33997; TTC-release: 7YPB, EMD-33998).
Main References
- 1.Ray-Soni A, Bellecourt MJ & Landick R Mechanisms of Bacterial Transcription Termination: All Good Things Must End. Annu Rev Biochem 85, 319–347, doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014844 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Proudfoot NJ Transcriptional termination in mammals: Stopping the RNA polymerase II juggernaut. Science 352, aad9926, doi: 10.1126/science.aad9926 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arimbasseri AG & Maraia RJ Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element. Mol Cell 58, 1124–1132, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.002 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yarnell WS & Roberts JW Mechanism of intrinsic transcription termination and antitermination. Science 284, 611–615 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vannini A & Cramer P Conservation between the RNA polymerase I, II, and III transcription initiation machineries. Mol Cell 45, 439–446, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.023 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Porrua O & Libri D Transcription termination and the control of the transcriptome: why, where and how to stop. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16, 190–202, doi: 10.1038/nrm3943 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roberts JW Mechanisms of Bacterial Transcription Termination. J Mol Biol 431, 4030–4039, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.003 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nielsen S, Yuzenkova Y & Zenkin N Mechanism of eukaryotic RNA polymerase III transcription termination. Science 340, 1577–1580, doi: 10.1126/science.1237934 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mairhofer J, Wittwer A, Cserjan-Puschmann M & Striedner G Preventing T7 RNA polymerase read-through transcription-A synthetic termination signal capable of improving bioprocess stability. ACS Synth Biol 4, 265–273, doi: 10.1021/sb5000115 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peters JM, Vangeloff AD & Landick R Bacterial transcription terminators: the RNA 3'-end chronicles. J Mol Biol 412, 793–813, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.036 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen YJ et al. Characterization of 582 natural and synthetic terminators and quantification of their design constraints. Nat Methods 10, 659–664, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2515 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gusarov I & Nudler E The mechanism of intrinsic transcription termination. Mol Cell 3, 495–504 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kang JY et al. RNA Polymerase Accommodates a Pause RNA Hairpin by Global Conformational Rearrangements that Prolong Pausing. Mol Cell 69, 802–815 e801, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.018 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guo X et al. Structural Basis for NusA Stabilized Transcriptional Pausing. Mol Cell 69, 816–827 e814, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.008 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vos SM, Farnung L, Urlaub H & Cramer P Structure of paused transcription complex Pol II-DSIF-NELF. Nature 560, 601–606, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0442-2 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vvedenskaya IO et al. Interactions between RNA polymerase and the "core recognition element" counteract pausing. Science 344, 1285–1289, doi: 10.1126/science.1253458 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Larson MH et al. A pause sequence enriched at translation start sites drives transcription dynamics in vivo. Science 344, 1042–1047, doi: 10.1126/science.1251871 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhu C et al. Transcription factors modulate RNA polymerase conformational equilibrium. Nat Commun 13, 1546, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29148-0 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kang JY et al. Structural basis of transcription arrest by coliphage HK022 Nun in an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase elongation complex. Elife 6, doi: 10.7554/eLife.25478 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang Y et al. Structural visualization of transcription activated by a multidrug-sensing MerR family regulator. Nat Commun 12, 2702, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22990-8 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lubkowska L, Maharjan AS & Komissarova N RNA folding in transcription elongation complex: implication for transcription termination. J Biol Chem 286, 31576–31585, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.249359 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.King RA, Markov D, Sen R, Severinov K & Weisberg RA A conserved zinc binding domain in the largest subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase modulates intrinsic transcription termination and antitermination but does not stabilize the elongation complex. J Mol Biol 342, 1143–1154, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.072 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Toulokhonov I & Landick R The flap domain is required for pause RNA hairpin inhibition of catalysis by RNA polymerase and can modulate intrinsic termination. Mol Cell 12, 1125–1136, doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00439-8 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ray-Soni A, Mooney RA & Landick R Trigger loop dynamics can explain stimulation of intrinsic termination by bacterial RNA polymerase without terminator hairpin contact. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, E9233–E9242, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706247114 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Komissarova N, Becker J, Solter S, Kireeva M & Kashlev M Shortening of RNA:DNA hybrid in the elongation complex of RNA polymerase is a prerequisite for transcription termination. Mol Cell 10, 1151–1162 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Larson MH, Greenleaf WJ, Landick R & Block SM Applied force reveals mechanistic and energetic details of transcription termination. Cell 132, 971–982, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.027 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Santangelo TJ & Roberts JW Forward translocation is the natural pathway of RNA release at an intrinsic terminator. Mol Cell 14, 117–126 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Epshtein V, Cardinale CJ, Ruckenstein AE, Borukhov S & Nudler E An allosteric path to transcription termination. Mol Cell 28, 991–1001, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.011 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kashlev M & Komissarova N Transcription termination: primary intermediates and secondary adducts. J Biol Chem 277, 14501–14508, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200215200 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bellecourt MJ, Ray-Soni A, Harwig A, Mooney RA & Landick R RNA Polymerase Clamp Movement Aids Dissociation from DNA but Is Not Required for RNA Release at Intrinsic Terminators. J Mol Biol 431, 696–713, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.003 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Park JS & Roberts JW Role of DNA bubble rewinding in enzymatic transcription termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 4870–4875, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600145103 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ryder AM & Roberts JW Role of the non-template strand of the elongation bubble in intrinsic transcription termination. J Mol Biol 334, 205–213, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.039 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shankar S, Hatoum A & Roberts JW A transcription antiterminator constructs a NusA-dependent shield to the emerging transcript. Mol Cell 27, 914–927 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harden TT et al. Alternative transcription cycle for bacterial RNA polymerase. Nat Commun 11, 448, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14208-9 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kang W et al. Transcription reinitiation by recycling RNA polymerase that diffuses on DNA after releasing terminated RNA. Nat Commun 11, 450, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14200-3 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dey S et al. Structural insights into RNA-mediated transcription regulation in bacteria. Mol Cell 82, 3885–3900 e3810, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.020 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pei HH et al. The delta subunit and NTPase HelD institute a two-pronged mechanism for RNA polymerase recycling. Nat Commun 11, 6418, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20159-3 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kouba T et al. Mycobacterial HelD is a nucleic acids-clearing factor for RNA polymerase. Nat Commun 11, 6419, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20158-4 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Newing TP et al. Molecular basis for RNA polymerase-dependent transcription complex recycling by the helicase-like motor protein HelD. Nat Commun 11, 6420, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20157-5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hou H et al. Structural insights into RNA polymerase III-mediated transcription termination through trapping poly-deoxythymidine. Nat Commun 12, 6135, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26402-9 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Method references
- 41.Girbig M et al. Architecture of the yeast Pol III pre-termination complex and pausing mechanism on poly(dT) termination signals. Cell Rep 40, 111316, doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111316 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hudson BP et al. Three-dimensional EM structure of an intact activator-dependent transcription initiation complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 19830–19835, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908782106 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hein PP et al. RNA polymerase pausing and nascent-RNA structure formation are linked through clamp-domain movement. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21, 794–802, doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2867 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mastronarde DN Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J Struct Biol 152, 36–51, doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zheng SQ et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14, 331–332, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rohou A & Grigorieff N CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol 192, 216–221, doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zivanov J et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pettersen EF et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612, doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Emsley P & Cowtan K Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 2126–2132, doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Adams PD et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 213–221, doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ha KS, Toulokhonov I, Vassylyev DG & Landick R The NusA N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for enhancement of transcriptional pausing via interaction with the RNA exit channel of RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 401, 708–725, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.036 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chakraborty A et al. Opening and closing of the bacterial RNA polymerase clamp. Science 337, 591–595, doi: 10.1126/science.1218716 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Feklistov A et al. RNA polymerase motions during promoter melting. Science 356, 863–866, doi: 10.1126/science.aam7858 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The cryo-EM map and coordinates were deposited in Protein Data Bank and Electron Microscopy Data Bank (TTC-pause: 7YP9 and EMD-33996; TTC-hairpin: 7YPA, EMD-33997; TTC-release: 7YPB, EMD-33998).