Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Oct 27;62(12):2490–2501. doi: 10.1111/trf.17157

Aged versus fresh autologous platelet transfusion in a two‐hit healthy volunteer model of transfusion‐related acute lung injury

Floor L F van Baarle 1,2,, Sanne de Bruin 1,2, Esther B Bulle 1,2, Niels van Mourik 1,2, Endry H T Lim 1,2, Anita M Tuip‐de Boer 1, Annabel Bongers 1, Marit B de Wissel 1, Robin van Bruggen 3, Dirk de Korte 3,4, Christie Vermeulen 4, Khik Wie Tan 5, René E Jonkers 6, Peter I Bonta 6, René Lutter 6,7,8, Tamara Dekker 7, Barbara S Dierdorp 7, Anna L Peters 9, Bart J Biemond 10, Alexander P J Vlaar 1,2
PMCID: PMC10092071  PMID: 36300793

Abstract

Background

Transfusion‐related acute lung injury (TRALI) is a severe complication of blood transfusion that is thought of as a two‐hit event: first the underlying patient condition (e.g., sepsis), and then the transfusion. Transfusion factors include human leukocyte antigen antibodies or biologic response modifiers (BRMs) accumulating during storage. Preclinical studies show an increased TRALI risk with longer stored platelets, clinical studies are conflicting. We aim to discover whether longer platelet concentrate (PC) storage time increases TRALI risk in a controlled human experiment.

Study Design and Methods

In a randomized controlled trial, 18 healthy male volunteers received a first hit of experimental endotoxemia (2 ng/kg lipopolysaccharide), and a second hit of fresh (2‐day old) or aged (7‐day old) autologous PC, or physiological saline. After 6 h, changes in TRALI pathways were determined using spirometry, chest X‐ray, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).

Results

All subjects reacted adequately to lipopolysaccharide infusion and satisfied SIRS criteria (increased pulse [>90/min] and temperature [>38°C]). There were no differences between the saline, fresh, and aged PC groups in BAL‐fluid protein (95 ± 33 μg/ml; 83 ± 21 μg/ml and 104 ± 29 μg/ml, respectively) and relative neutrophil count (1.5 ± 0.5%; 1.9 ± 0.8% and 1.3 ± 0.8%, respectively), nor in inflammatory BAL‐fluid BRMs (Interleukin‐6, CXCL8, TNFα , and myeloperoxidase), clinical respiratory parameters, and spirometry results. All chest X‐rays were normal.

Conclusions

In a human endotoxemia model of autologous platelet transfusion, with an adequate first hit and platelet storage lesion, transfusion of 7‐day‐old PC does not increase pulmonary inflammation compared with 2‐day‐old PC.

Keywords: autologous blood transfusion, bronchoalveolar lavage, platelet activation, platelet transfusion, transfusion‐related acute lung injury


Abbreviations

A‐PLT

apheresis platelet concentrate

ARDS

acute respiratory distress syndrome

ANOVA

analysis of variance

BC‐PLT

buffy coat‐derived platelet concentrate

BRMs

biologic response modifiers

BAL

bronchoalveolar lavage

DLCO

diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide

ECG

electrocardiogram

HLA

human leukocyte antigen

HNA

human neutrophil antigen

IL

interleukin

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

PAS

platelet additive solution

P/F

PaO2/FiO2

PC

platelet concentrate

sCD40L

soluble CD40 ligand

TRALI

transfusion‐related acute lung injury

TNF

tumor necrosis factor

1. INTRODUCTION

Transfusion‐related acute lung injury (TRALI) is a severe complication of blood transfusion, with a high mortality rate and an especially high incidence among critically ill patients. 1 , 2 TRALI causes dyspnea within 6 h of blood transfusion, with clinical symptoms alike to the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 3 TRALI is characterized by an increase in pulmonary inflammation, leading to endothelial damage, neutrophil influx and fluid leakage. 4 , 5 It is thought to be a two‐hit event, where an underlying clinical condition serves as a first hit and antibodies and inflammatory agents in the transfusion product serve as a second hit. 4 , 5 TRALI can be mediated by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or human neutrophil antigen (HNA) antibodies present in the transfusion product (antibody‐mediated), but also by bioactive lipids and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) that accumulate during storage (non‐antibody‐mediated). 4 , 6 , 7 Non‐antibody‐mediated TRALI has been shown to occur in animal models, yet in human settings the lipids and cytokines involved have only been implicated in transfusion reactions in general. 7 , 8 The incidence of antibody‐mediated TRALI has been greatly reduced by the exclusion of female plasma donors and donors with HLA or HNA antibodies that were implicated in a previous TRALI case. However, this has no effect on non‐antibody‐mediated TRALI. 2 , 4 , 9 , 10 , 11

Platelets are sensitive cells that are prone to develop a platelet storage lesion during collection and storage of platelet concentrates (PCs). 12 The storage lesion refers to a myriad of biochemical changes, such as the accumulation of leukocyte‐derived cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]α, interleukin [IL] 1α, IL‐6, CXCL8), platelet‐derived sCD40L and extracellular vesicles in the PC, and increased expression of platelet apoptosis and activation markers (phosphatidylserine, CD62P). 12 In a case–control study of TRALI‐implicated and control PCs, sCD40L levels increased during storage in all products, but PCs implicated in TRALI showed significantly higher levels. 13 In animal models, increased PC storage time is associated with TRALI, 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 while clinical studies report conflicting data. 1 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 In this study, we investigated the effect of PC storage time on pathways leading to the development of TRALI in a two‐hit in vivo human autologous platelet transfusion model, and hypothesized that longer storage duration decreases respiratory function and increases pulmonary inflammation and neutrophil and fluid extravasation.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study protocol “Development of a ‘two‐hit’ in vivo autologous platelet transfusion model in healthy volunteers” was approved by the Academic Medical Centre Medical Ethical Committee, part of Amsterdam UMC, on 18 November 2014 under reference number 2014_294#B2014961, and is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All volunteers provided written informed consent prior to study enrolment. The study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR6493).

2.1. Inclusion of volunteers

Between April 2018 and November 2021, we included 18 healthy male volunteers aged 18–35. Volunteers who dropped out of the study between the screening visit and subsequent study visits were replaced. Volunteers were screened on medical history, physical examination, blood and urine tests, electrocardiogram (ECG), chest X‐ray, spirometry, and the lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Any previous participation in a trial using lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was not allowed, and participation in another intervention trial was not allowed in the 3 months prior to inclusion and during the course of the study.

2.2. Preparation of transfusion products

Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 6 per group): autologous transfusion of fresh (2‐day‐old) PC, autologous transfusion of aged (7‐day‐old) PC, or infusion of an equal volume of normal saline (0.9% wt/vol NaCl). A randomization sequence was created by the investigators using R‐Studio (version 1.3.1093; Boston, MA) and put into consecutively numbered opaque envelopes that were opened after inclusion of each participant. All volunteers donated one unit of apheresis PC, either 2 or 7 days before the experiment, including those who were allocated to the saline group (three of whom donated 2 days prior and three of whom donated 7 days prior to the experiment). PCs were stored in 100% platelet additive solution (PAS) E and kept at 22°C under gentle agitation, according to Dutch Blood Bank standards. On the day of the experiment, 50 ml PC was labeled with biotin, as previously described and then returned to the storage bag. 26 Activation markers CD62P (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and CD63 (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and apoptosis marker phosphatidylserine (Biorbyt, Cambridge, UK) were measured on post‐storage, pre‐transfusion platelets using flow cytometry (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

2.3. Blinding

As volunteers had to donate either 2 or 7 days before the experiment, it was impossible to keep them blinded, and according to Good Clinical Practice, it was impossible to blind for saline or PC transfusion, so we performed an open‐label randomized trial.

2.4. Two‐hit model

Experiments were conducted at the research unit of the intensive care department, and volunteers were monitored during the entire experiment (Figure S1). A peripheral venous catheter was inserted to administer 1 L of normal saline prehydration 1 h before the start of the experiment, after which maintenance fluids were set at 1.5 L of normal saline per 24 h until the end of the experiment. An arterial catheter was placed in the radial artery or, if anatomy obliged, the femoral artery. Recordings of continuous five‐lead ECG, pulse oximetry, respiratory rate (patient monitor; Philips, Eindhoven, the Netherlands), and invasive arterial blood pressure (Edwards Life Sciences, Irvine, CA) were automatically recorded in the electronic medical record (Epic, Verona, WI) from prehydration until 9 h after the start of the experiment (T9). Body temperature was measured hourly by an infrared tympanic thermometer (Genius II; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). The experiment started at timepoint T0 with the bolus administration of 2 ng/kg Escherichia coli LPS (National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD) as first hit. Two hours after the first hit (T2), volunteers received either fresh or aged PC or a saline infusion as second hit. The second hit was infused over the course of 50 min.

2.5. Sample collection and analysis

Each hour during the experiment, self‐reported symptoms (dyspnea, headache, myalgia, chills, nausea, and photophobia) were recorded on a five‐point scale (mild–moderate–severe–life‐threatening–fatal). Vital parameters were recorded simultaneously. Arterial blood was collected prior to LPS, prior to transfusion, 10, 30, and 60 min after the transfusion was fully administered and each hour afterwards until T9. Blood‐gas variables were analyzed unadjusted for temperature and without oxygen supplementation, with a RapidLab 1265 (Siemens, Germany) in lithium heparin anticoagulated blood, and were used to calculate the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio. Five hours after the start of transfusion (T7), the spirometry, DLCO‐measurement, and chest X‐ray were repeated. Six hours after the start of transfusion (T8), a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed by an experienced pulmonologist, in the middle lobe, using 8 fractions of 20 ml normal saline. The BAL was performed using a flexible bronchoscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) after local anesthesia with lidocaine 1% according to Dutch guidelines. 27

Potassium EDTA anticoagulated blood was used for differential leukocyte count by the routine hospital laboratory before LPS, before transfusion, and every second hour afterwards. BAL‐fluid (BALF) and potassium EDTA anticoagulated blood at T8 were used for differential leukocyte count by a specialized immunological laboratory. Total protein content was measured in BALF using a Lowry assay. IL‐6, CXCL8, TNFα , and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were measured in potassium EDTA anticoagulated plasma (T0, T2, T4, and T8) and BALF. IL‐6, CXCL8, and TNFα were measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and MPO was measured using a Luminex multiplex assay (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) read on a BioPlex 200 (BioRad, Hercules, CA).

2.6. Outcomes

Co‐primary outcomes were the BALF protein and neutrophil content. Secondary outcomes include respiratory parameters (P/F ratio, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, spirometry, and DLCO) and inflammatory parameters (IL‐6, CXCL8, TNFα, and MPO) in both BALF and plasma.

2.7. Sample size

Based on the BALF protein content in a previous nested case–control study of TRALI cases (239 ± 85 μg/ml) and transfused controls (85 ± 26 μg/ml), 28 a sample size of three subjects per group was calculated (α = .05, β = .2). To account for the mildness of the expected lung injury in this model using LPS‐primed healthy volunteers instead of critically ill patients, the sample size was doubled to six subjects per group, which would give 80% power to detect a difference of 91 μg/ml in BALF protein content.

2.8. Statistical analysis

Normally distributed data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and non‐normally distributed data as median with interquartile range. Between‐group differences were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), a Kruskal–Wallis test, Student's t‐test, or Wilcoxon signed rank‐test as appropriate. Repeated measurements were analyzed using ANOVA repeated measurements with an interaction term for time and treatment allocation. Normality of data was assessed visually and using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Homogeneity of variance was assessed visually and using Levene's test. Sphericity of data was assessed using Mauchly's test and Greenhouse–Geisser corrections were applied as necessary. All statistical analyses were performed in R‐Studio (version 1.3.1093; Boston, MA), using packages Rmisc, rstatix, grid, ggplot2, tableone, and tidyverse. 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34

3. RESULTS

3.1. Baseline characteristics

Thirty‐one subjects were screened, of whom six were found ineligible due to abnormalities in spirometry, ECG, blood glucose level, or medical history. Seven eligible subjects withdrew from the study prior to the platelet apheresis appointment and were replaced by new subjects. There were no dropouts during the experiment. One subject randomized to the saline group was found to have abnormally high IL‐6, CXCL8, and TNFα levels at T0 and was retrospectively excluded from the analysis (Figure S2). A sensitivity analysis was performed without exclusion of this subject, and showed no difference to the primary analysis (Table S1). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were no serious adverse events.

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics

Variable Saline (n = 5) 2d PLTs (n = 6) 7d PLTs (n = 6)
Age (year) 25 (21–26) 23 (23–25) 27 (26–29)
BMI (kg/m2) 24 (2.6) 23 (0.8) 26 (2.8)
Heart rate (beats/min) 60 (5.7) 75 (18) 64 (7.7)
Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) 92 (6.4) 94 (9.4) 99 (7.2)
Platelet count (×109/L) 270 (38) 295 (83) 261 (42)
Leukocytes (×109/L) 6.7 (1.0) 7.8 (2.4) 6.1 (0.7)
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 15.0 (13.9–15.6) 15.9 (14.9–16.4) 14.3 (14.0–15.0)
FEV‐1/VC ratio (%) 81 (4.2) 81 (6.7) 80 (3.4)
Maximum vital capacity (L) 5.8 (5.4–6.3) 6.4 (5.8–6.8) 6.0 (5.6–6.2)
Lung CO diffusion capacity (mmol/min/kPa) 10.8 (1.4) 12.8 (1.9) 10.1 (1.4)

Note: Presented variables were measured during the screening visit, data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or as median (25th percentile–75th percentile).

Abbreviations: CO, carbon monoxide; FEV‐1/VC, forced expiratory volume in 1 s divided by vital capacity.

3.2. Transfusion products

All products were cleared for use by the blood bank and transfusion laboratory. However, the aged products expressed significantly more activation markers in flow cytometry analysis (Figure 1). The percentage of CD62P‐positive platelets was 5.0 ± 4.8% in the fresh platelets group and 11.0 ± 3.2% in the aged platelets group, p = .03. The percentage of CD63‐positive platelets was 1.1 ± 0.8% in the fresh platelets group and 3.2 ± 1.1% in the aged platelets group, p = .004. There was no difference in the percentage phosphatidylserine‐positive platelets as a marker of apoptosis: 19.9 ± 5.6% in the fresh platelets group and 20.6 ± 3.6 in the aged platelets group, p = .8. After stimulation with TRAP, all markers increased and no significant differences between fresh and aged platelets were found.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Aged platelets were significantly more activated than fresh platelets. Platelet activation (A/B: CD62P and C/D: CD63) and apoptosis (E/F: phosphatidylserine) markers were measured after storage, after biotinylation of 50 ml platelet concentrate out of a total volume of 300–350 ml, but prior to transfusion. Markers were measured using flow cytometry. Significance levels: *p < .05; **p < .01.

3.3. First hit

All subjects reacted to the LPS infusion as expected. There were significant changes over time in LPS‐related symptoms (Figure S3) and most vital parameters, with a maximum change approximately 4 h after LPS administration (Figure 2). Notably, temperature increased from 36.6 ± 0.5°C at baseline to 38.7 ± 0.8°C, pulse increased from 68/min ± 14 to 105/min ± 9, mean arterial pressure decreased from 91 ± 10 mmHg to 75 ± 10 mmHg, and oxygen saturation decreased from 100 ± 0.6% to 98 ± 1.3%. Blood neutrophil count increased until the end of the experiment, from 2.8 × 109/L ± 1.0 at baseline to 13.9 × 109/L ± 3.4, while IL‐6, CXCL8, and TNFα increased within 2 h (to 278 ± 129 pg/ml, 240 ± 146 pg/ml, and 296 ± 241 pg/ml, respectively) and then returned to normal levels (Figure 3). There were no significant interaction effects for time and treatment allocation. All subjects met the SIRS criteria, with their pulse above 90 beats/min and temperature above 38°C. 35

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

All subjects reacted adequately to a first hit of lipopolysaccharide. The light gray area represents the time before transfusion, and the dark gray area represents the time after transfusion. Data were analyzed using repeated measurements analysis of variance, with an interaction term for time and treatment allocation.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Blood cell counts and inflammatory biomarkers changed after infusion of lipopolysaccharide. The light gray area represents the time before transfusion, and the dark gray area represents the time after transfusion. Data were analyzed using repeated measurements analysis of variance, with an interaction term for time and treatment allocation.

3.4. Second hit

There were no significant between‐group differences in BALF protein content (95 ± 33 μg/ml, 83 ± 21 μg/ml, and 104 ± 29 μg/ml, respectively for the saline, fresh, and aged PC group) and relative neutrophil count (1.5 ± 0.5%, 1.9 ± 0.8%, and 1.3 ± 0.8%, respectively, for the saline, fresh, and aged PC group; Figure 4 and Table S2). There were also no significant between‐group differences with respect to BALF IL‐6, CXCL8, TNFα, and MPO levels (Table 2). BALF recovery was similar across groups. When comparing pre‐transfusion and post‐transfusion values for respiratory parameters, spirometry, DLCO, and N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), there were no between‐group differences (Table 3). None of the subjects met TRALI criteria: the P/F ratio remained above 300 mmHg for all subjects and all chest X‐rays were normal.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

BAL‐fluid protein content and neutrophil count did not differ between groups. Boxplots show the median and interquartile ranges for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid protein content (A) and BAL‐fluid relative neutrophil count (B). Individual measurements are shown as small dots, while group means are shown as ♦.

TABLE 2.

Biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained 6 h after the second hit

Biomarker Saline (n = 5) 2d PLTs (n = 6) 7d PLTs (n = 6) p
Median interleukin 6 (IQR)—pg/ml 1.74 (0.48–3.84) 1.61 (0.22–5.26) 2.96 (1.92–3.87) .867
Median CXCL8 (IQR)—pg/ml 10.35 (4.59–10.61) 2.63 (2.17–7.84) 5.27 (5.04–5.64) .318
Median TNFα (IQR)—pg/ml 1.14 (0.34–2.10) 2.64 (2.07–4.08) 2.89 (2.09–3.96) .289
Median myeloperoxidase (IQR)—ng/ml 1.94 (1.48–10.96) 1.61 (1.31–1.67) 2.02 (1.78–2.48) .483

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

TABLE 3.

Respiratory parameters

Variable Pre‐transfusion Post‐transfusion p (change)
Saline (n = 5) 2d PLTs (n = 6) 7d PLTs (n = 6) Saline (n = 5) 2d PLTs (n = 6) 7d PLTs (n = 6)
P/F ratio (mmHg) a 454 (57) 460 (51) 496 (25) 396 (34) 398 (35) 410 (39) 0.75
Oxygen saturation (%) a 99 (0.6) 100 (0.4) 100 (0.0) 97 (1.3) 98 (1.0) 98 (1.4) 0.35
Respiratory rate (/min) a 17 (4.2) 19 (5.4) 19 (3.1) 21 (2.3) 24 (2.1) 23 (2.5) 0.97
Subjective dyspnea a 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0.5 (0–1) 0.69
FEV‐1/VC ratio (%) b 98 (5.3) 98 (7.5) 96 (3.5) 92 (8.6) 95 (12.1) 94 (2.9) 0.29
Maximum vital capacity (%) b 108 (8.5) 105 (9.7) 111 (13.7) 106 (9.7) 102 (8.1) 109 (12.0) 0.99
Lung CO diffusion capacity (%) b 95 (6.8) 105 (10.5) 92 (13.6) 97 (6.3) 101 (6.9) 90 (15.4) 0.58
NT‐proBNP (ng/L) c 49 (49–49) 49 (49–49) 49 (49–49) 152 (106–219) 49 (49–111) 135 (68–154) 0.34

Note: The last column represents the p‐value of the difference in relative change in pre‐ and posttransfusion between the different experimental groups and is calculated with analysis of variance if normally distributed with homogeneous variance and Kruskal–Wallis test if not. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or as median (25th percentile–75th percentile).

Abbreviations: CO, carbon monoxide; FEV‐1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; P/F, arterial partial oxygen pressure/inhaled oxygen fraction; VC, vital capacity.

a

Values were assessed hourly, values pre‐transfusion are at timepoint 2 or, if missing, the most recent available timepoint, and values post‐transfusion are the worst value at timepoints 3–8.

b

Values pre‐ and posttransfusion are at screening and at timepoint 7, respectively. Values represent the percentage of the expected value, based on age, sex, height, and weight.

c

Values pre‐ and posttransfusion are at timepoint 0 and at timepoint 8, respectively. Values below the detection limit (<50) are represented as 49.

4. DISCUSSION

In this study, we hypothesized that transfusion of PC with longer storage duration decreases respiratory function and increases pulmonary inflammation and neutrophil and fluid extravasation during human experimental endotoxemia. Our data showed no difference between 2‐day stored and 7‐day stored autologous PCs. These results add to existing evidence from animal studies that showed a relation between PC storage length and TRALI development, and evidence from clinical studies, showing conflicting results. Our setup differs in some important aspects from previous studies, which might explain these results.

First, the conflicting evidence in the clinical setting is mainly derived from observational data, and thus likely suffers from bias and confounding. Two case–control studies found a difference in PC storage duration between TRALI cases and transfused controls, 20 , 21 while two other case–control studies did not. 1 , 22 Two small randomized studies on PC storage duration found no TRALI cases, but were likely underpowered to find any, as their focus was on platelet count increment and transfusion intervals. 23 , 24 An individual patient data meta‐analysis of PC storage duration found no relation with in‐hospital mortality, 36 and neither did two retrospective and one prospective cohort study. 37 , 38 , 39

Second, when comparing our results with the positive findings in previous animal models, it is important to note that the studies by Tung et al. and Silliman et al. used cross‐species transfusions of only the platelet supernatant, 14 , 15 , 17 the studies by McVey et al. used different strains of mice as donor and as model animals, 18 , 19 and the study by Vlaar et al., which used the same strain of rats both as donor and as model animal, only found an effect in lung coagulopathy, but not in lung inflammation and lung injury. 16 Moreover, in the studies by Vlaar et al. and McVey et al., the murine platelets were stored in smaller volumes than regular human PCs, 16 , 18 , 19 which might have increased their ex vivo activation, as was previously shown in human PCs. 26 Another important difference concerns the dose of lipopolysaccharide, which was 7.5–1000 times higher in the animal models, representing a very severe phenotype that cannot be used ethically in a human volunteer study. Instead, in this study, we were interested in the pulmonary inflammatory reaction that precedes and accompanies TRALI, with BALF protein, neutrophil, IL‐6, CXCL8, TNFα , and MPO content serving as surrogate outcomes for the development of full‐blown TRALI.

Allogeneic transfusions are the clinical standard and were also used in the previously mentioned animal studies, which makes it hard to discern whether any effect arises from an increase in storage length or from patient–donor mismatch and/or HLA antibodies. The use of autologous transfusions in our study has allowed us to selectively study the effect of platelet storage duration, while disregarding any antibody‐mediated effects. The difference between 2 days of storage and 7 days of storage is as large a difference as feasible, and even larger than possible in regions where PCs are stored for a maximum of 5 days. Indeed, 7‐day‐stored platelets showed significantly increased activation compared with two‐day stored platelets, yet did not induce changes in any of the clinical and laboratory outcomes in this experimental human model. Moreover, we found no difference between either autologous PC group and the saline control group, suggesting that an allogeneic factor might be needed for TRALI to occur.

Our study has some limitations. First, we only studied male subjects, so we cannot preclude that a difference does exist for females, especially since females tend to show a stronger immune response to LPS treatment. 40 However, sex and gender are no clinical risk factors for TRALI. 3 Also, since we found no effect whatsoever in all primary and secondary outcomes, it is unlikely that inclusion of female subjects would alter these results. Second, although LPS infusion results in a pronounced immune response, it does not give the same degree of severity as seen in critically ill patients. However, we think that the LPS model is sufficient to investigate our hypothesis for several reasons: the current LPS model was directly translated from animal experiments where TRALI was observed; bolus injection of LPS results in sustained transcriptomic changes in circulating neutrophils, and adequately primes circulating neutrophils, which ought to be a sufficient first hit. 41 , 42 Moreover, our sample size was doubled to account for the expected less severe clinical condition as compared with critically ill patients. Another limiting factor is that PC storage performance consistently differs between donors, with older donors and diabetic donors showing worse storage performance than young and healthy donors. 43 , 44 Therefore, the use of younger instead of older volunteers, and healthy instead of diabetic volunteers, might have influenced our results. This was, however, a choice made out of concern for the safety of our human volunteers, who are both donor and recipient in this autologous model. A follow‐up study could potentially include these older and diabetic subjects, but would need to balance volunteer risk with scientific potential.

The use of apheresis PC (A‐PLT) instead of the buffy‐coat‐derived PCs (BC‐PLT), necessitated by the autologous nature of this study, could be considered both a strength and a limitation, as different regions have different preferences for either A‐PLT or BC‐PLT, and there are important differences between the two. In one study, A‐PLTs were shown to be more activated than BC‐PLTs after production, but showed a smaller increase in activation during storage. 45 In line with these results, PAS storage medium was shown to decrease TRALI incidence for BC‐PLTs, but not for A‐PLTs. 10 However, in another study, there was increased activation in BC‐PLTs after production and no difference in additional storage‐related activation between BC‐PLTs and A‐PLTs. 46 Therefore, we cannot say with certainty whether the use of A‐PLTs instead of BC‐PLTs influenced the results of our study.

While we were able to study the isolated effect of storage duration, in the absence of HLA or HNA antibodies, it remains an open question whether an interaction between these two TRALI mechanisms exists. Knockout of CD62P in a murine model decreased pulmonary edema and both pulmonary and systemic inflammation during antibody‐mediated TRALI. 47 Since platelets show increased CD62P expression during storage, it could be hypothesized that aged platelets play an intermediary role in antibody‐mediated TRALI. It would be interesting to further study such an interaction in a clinical trial, but given the incidence rate of TRALI that study would require a very large sample size.

Meanwhile, several steps have already been taken to prevent TRALI and other transfusion reactions. Universal leukoreduction prevents leukocyte‐derived cytokines from accumulating during storage and decreases the incidence of transfusion reactions. 48 , 49 Similarly, the use of PAS for storage of platelets, as opposed to plasma, has decreased the incidence of transfusion reactions. 50 The incidence of antibody‐mediated TRALI has decreased since the exclusion of antibody‐positive donors. 2 , 9 , 10

In this study, we have shown that autologous transfusion of longer stored platelets in the presence of endotoxemia does not increase pulmonary fluid and neutrophil leakage nor decrease respiratory function in a human experimental model of mild TRALI, suggesting that increased storage duration alone does not increase TRALI risk. We propose instead that future research focus more on further reduction of antibody‐mediated TRALI.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This study is funded by ZonMW [Zorgonderzoek Medische Wetenschappen] (part of the NWO [Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research], Den Haag, The Netherlands), project number 843002625 and project 09150172010047 and Sanquin PPO 18–06/L‐number: 2329. The sponsors of this work were not involved in the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Appendix S1. Supporting information.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Alexander P. J. Vlaar, Anna L. Peters, Robin van Bruggen, and Dirk de Korte were involved in study conception and design. Floor L. F. van Baarle, Sanne de Bruin, Esther B. Bulle, Niels van Mourik, Endry H. T. Lim, Christie Vermeulen, Khik Wie Tan, René E. Jonkers, and Peter I. Bonta were involved in data collection. Floor L. F. van Baarle, Sanne de Bruin, Esther B. Bulle, Anita M. Tuip‐de Boer, Annabel Bongers, Marit B. de Wissel, René Lutter, Tamara Dekker, and Barbara S. Dierdorp were involved in data analysis. Floor L. F. van Baarle, Alexander P. J. Vlaar, Bart J. Biemond, Robin van Bruggen, and Dirk de Korte prepared the manuscript and all authors read and agreed to the final submitted version. We would like to thank all Amsterdam UMC nurses and physicians who helped in acquiring the data presented in this manuscript by inserting arterial catheters or assisting during bronchoalveolar lavages, and all Sanquin personnel who helped produce the autologous PCs. We would also like to thank M. C. A. Müller and R. Kapur for their critical reading of this manuscript.

van Baarle FLF, de Bruin S, Bulle EB, van Mourik N, Lim EHT, Tuip‐de Boer AM, et al. Aged versus fresh autologous platelet transfusion in a two‐hit healthy volunteer model of transfusion‐related acute lung injury. Transfusion. 2022;62(12):2490–2501. 10.1111/trf.17157

Funding information Stichting Sanquin Bloedvoorziening, Grant/Award Number: PPO 18‐06 / L‐number: 2329; ZonMw, Grant/Award Numbers: 09150172010047, 843002625

REFERENCES

  • 1. Vlaar APJ, Binnekade JM, Prins D, van Stein D, Hofstra JJ, Schultz MJ, et al. Risk factors and outcome of transfusion‐related acute lung injury in the critically ill: a nested case‐control study. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):771–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Toy P, Gajic O, Bacchetti P, Looney MR, Gropper MA, Hubmayr R, et al. Transfusion‐related acute lung injury: incidence and risk factors. Blood. 2012;119(7):1757–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Vlaar APJ, Toy P, Fung M, Looney MR, Juffermans NP, Bux J, et al. A consensus redefinition of transfusion‐related acute lung injury. Transfusion. 2019;59(7):2465–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vlaar APJ, Juffermans NP. Transfusion‐related acute lung injury: a clinical review. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):984–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Semple JW, Rebetz J, Kapur R. Transfusion‐associated circulatory overload and transfusion‐related acute lung injury. Blood. 2019;133(17):1840–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Semple JW, McVey MJ, Kim M, Rebetz J, Kuebler WM, Kapur R. Targeting transfusion‐related acute lung injury: the journey from basic science to novel therapies. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(5):e452–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zeeuw van der Laan EAN, van der Velden S, Porcelijn L, Semple JW, van der Schoot CE, Kapur R. Evaluation of platelet responses in transfusion‐related acute lung injury (TRALI). Transfus Med Rev. 2020;34(4):227–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sut C, Tariket S, Cognasse F, Garraud O. Determination of predictors of severity for recipient adverse reactions during platelet product transfusions. Transfus Clin Biol. 2017;24(2):87–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Muller MCA, van Stein D, Binnekade JM, van Rhenen DJ, Vlaar APJ. Low‐risk transfusion‐related acute lung injury donor strategies and the impact on the onset of transfusion‐related acute lung injury: a meta‐analysis. Transfusion. 2015;55(1):164–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Andreau G, Boudjedir K, Muller JY, Pouchol E, Ozier Y, Fevre G, et al. Analysis of transfusion‐related acute lung injury and possible transfusion‐related acute lung injury reported to the French hemovigilance network from 2007‐2013. Transfus Med Rev. 2018;32(1):16–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kuldanek SA, Kelher M, Silliman CC. Risk factors, management and prevention of transfusion‐related acute lung injury: a comprehensive update. Expert Rev Hematol. 2019;12(9):773–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ng MSY, Tung JP, Fraser JF. Platelet storage lesions: what more do we know now? Transfus Med Rev. 2018;32(3):144–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Khan SY, Kelher MR, Heal JM, Blumberg N, Boshkov LK, Phipps R, et al. Soluble CD40 ligand accumulates in stored blood components, primes neutrophils through CD40, and is a potential cofactor in the development of transfusion‐related acute lung injury. Blood. 2006;108(7):2455–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Silliman CC, Bjornsen AJ, Wyman TH, Kelher M, Allard J, Bieber S, et al. Plasma and lipids from stored platelets cause acute lung injury in an animal model. Transfusion. 2003;43(5):633–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Silliman CC, Khan SY, Bradley Ball J, Kelher MR, Marschner S. Mirasol Pathogen Reduction Technology® treatment does not affect acute lung injury in a two‐event in vivo model caused by stored blood components. Vox Sang. 2010;98(4):525–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vlaar APJ, Hofstra JJ, Kulik W, van Lenthe H, Nieuwland R, Schlutz MJ, et al. Supernatants of stored platelets causes lung inflammation and coagulopathy in a novel in vivo transfusion model. Blood. 2010;116(8):1360–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tung JP, Fung YL, Nataatmadja M, Colebourne KI, Esmaeel HM, Wilson K, et al. A novel in vivo ovine model of transfusion‐related acute lung injury (TRALI). Vox Sang. 2011;100(2):219–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. McVey MJ, Kim M, Tabuchi A, Srbely V, Japtok L, Arenz C, et al. Acid sphingomyelinase mediates murine acute lung injury following transfusion of aged platelets. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017;312(5):L625–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. McVey MJ, Weidenfeld S, Maishan M, Spring C, Kim M, Tabuchi A, et al. Platelet extracellular vesicles mediate transfusion‐related acute lung injury by imbalancing the sphingolipid rheostat. Blood. 2021;137(5):690–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Silliman CC, Boshkov LK, Mehdizadehkashi Z, Elzi DJ, Dickey WO, Podlosky L, et al. Transfusion‐related acute lung injury: epidemiology and a prospective analysis of etiologic factors. Blood. 2003;101(2):454–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Middelburg RA, Borkent B, Jansen M, van de Watering LMG, Wiersum‐Osselton JC, Schipperus MR, et al. Storage time of blood products and transfusion‐related acute lung injury. Transfusion. 2012;52(3):658–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Vlaar APJ, Hofstra JJ, Determann RM, Veelo DP, Paulus F, Kulik W, et al. The incidence, risk factors, and outcome of transfusion‐related acute lung injury in a cohort of cardiac surgery patients: a prospective nested case‐control study. Blood. 2011;117(16):4218–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Diedrich B, Ringdén O, Watz E, Shanwell A. A randomized study of buffy coat platelets in platelet additive solution stored 1‐5 versus 6‐7 days prior to prophylactic transfusion of allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell transplant recipients. Vox Sang. 2009;97(3):254–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. MacLennan S, Harding K, Llewelyn C, Choo L, Bakrania L, Massey E, et al. A randomized noninferiority crossover trial of corrected count increments and bleeding in thrombocytopenic hematology patients receiving 2‐ to 5‐ versus 6‐ or 7‐day‐stored platelets. Transfusion. 2015;55(8):1856–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Peters AL, van Hezel ME, Juffermans NP, Vlaar APJ. Pathogenesis of non‐antibody mediated transfusion‐related acute lung injury from bench to bedside. Blood Rev. 2015;29(1):51–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. de Bruin S, van de Weerdt EK, Sijbrands D, Vlaar R, Gouwerok E, Biemond BJ, et al. Biotinylation of platelets for transfusion purposes a novel method to label platelets in a closed system. Transfusion. 2019;59(9):2964–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. NVALT . Nederlandse Vereniging van Artsen voor Longziekten en Tuberculose. Bronchoscopie. NVALT. 2003. [Accessed 2022 May 3rd]. Available from: https://www.nvalt.nl/kwaliteit/richtlijnen/behandelkamer‐operatiekamer/_/Behandelkamer%20‐%20Operatiekamer/Richtlijn%20Bronchoscopie%20April%202003.pdf.
  • 28. Vlaar APJ, Hofstra JJ, Determann RM, Veelo DP, Paulus F, Levi M, et al. Transfusion‐related acute lung injury in cardiac surgery patients is characterized by pulmonary inflammation and coagulopathy: a prospective nested case‐control study. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(10):2813–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. R core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hope RM (2013). Rmisc: Ryan miscellaneous. R package version 1.5. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rmisc/
  • 31. Kassambara A. Rstatix: pipe‐friendly framework for basic statistical tests. R package version 0.7.0. 2021. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix.
  • 32. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer‐Verlag; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yoshida K, Bartel A. Tableone: create ‘table 1’ to describe baseline characteristics with or without propensity score weights. R package version 0.12.0. 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tableone.
  • 34. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, Francios R. Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4(43):1686. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ng MSY, Hay K, Choy J, Middelburg RA, Tung JP, Fraser JF. Fresh frozen plasma and platelet concentrate storage duration not associated with in hospital mortality risk. Vox Sang. 2019;114(8):835–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Inaba K, Branco BC, Rhee P, Blackbourne LH, Holcomb JB, Spinella PC, et al. Impact of the duration of platelet storage in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1766–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Flint AF, Aubron C, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Pilcher D, Cheng AC, et al. Duration of platelet storage and outcomes of critically ill patients. Transfusion. 2017;57(3):599–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Nellis ME, Spinella PC, Tucci M, Stanworth SJ, Steiner ME, Cushing MM, et al. Effect of platelet storage duration on clinical outcomes and incremental platelet change in critically ill children. Transfusion. 2020;60(12):2849–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wegner A, Elsenbruch S, Rebernik L, Roderigo T, Engelbrecht E, Jäger M, et al. Inflammation‐induced pain sensitization in men and women: does sex matter in experimental endotoxemia? Pain. 2015;156(10):1954–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Pillay J, Ramakers BP, Kamp VM, Lo Tam Loi A, Lam SW, Hietbrink F, et al. Functional heterogeneity and differential priming of circulating neutrophils in human experimental endotoxemia. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88(1):211–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. de Kleijn S, Kox M, Sama IE, Pillay J, van Diepen A, Huijnen MA, et al. Transcriptome kinetics of circulating neutrophils during human experimental endotoxemia. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bontekoe IJ, van der Meer PF, van den Hurk K, Verhoeven AJ, de Korte D. Platelet storage performance is consistent by donor: a pilot study comparing “good” and “poor” storing platelets. Transfusion. 2017;57(10):2373–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Bontekoe IJ, van der Meer PF, Verhoeven AJ, de Korte D. Platelet storage properties are associated with donor age: in vitro quality of platelets from young donors and older donors with and without type 2 diabetes. Vox Sang. 2019;114(2):129–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sut C, Tariket S, Aloui C, Arthaud C‐A, Eyraud M‐A, Fagan J, et al. Soluble CD40L and CD62P levels differ in single‐donor apheresis platelet concentrates and buffy coat‐derived pooled platelet concentrates. Transfusion. 2019;59(1):16–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Singh S, Hakimi CS, Jeppsson A, Hesse C. Platelet storage lesion in interim platelet unit concentrates: a comparison with buffy‐coat and apheresis concentrates. Transfus Apher Sci. 2017;56(6):870–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Tong S, Wang H, Zhang T, Chen L, Liu B. Accumulation of CD62P during storage of apheresis platelet concentrates and the role of CD62P in transfusion‐related acute lung injury. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(5):7777–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Blumberg N, Heal JM, Gettings KF, Phipps RP, Masel D, Refaai MJ, et al. An association between decreased cardiopulmonary complications (transfusion‐related acute lung injury and transfusion‐associated circulatory overload) and implementation of universal leukoreduction of blood transfusions. Transfusion. 2010;50(12):2738–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kreuger AL, Caram‐Deelder C, Jacobse J, Kerkhoffs J‐L, van der Bom J, Middelburg RA. Effect of storage time of platelet products on clinical outcomes after transfusion: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Vox Sang. 2017;112(4):291–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. van der Meer PF. PAS or plasma for storage of platelets? A concise review. Transfus Med. 2016;26(5):339–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix S1. Supporting information.


Articles from Transfusion are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES