Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1984 Feb;41(1):122–132. doi: 10.1136/oem.41.1.122

Effects of impulse noise and continuous steady state noise on hearing.

S Mäntysalo, J Vuori
PMCID: PMC1009246  PMID: 6691929

Abstract

In this study the effects on hearing induced by occupational exposure to impulse noise were compared with those induced by exposure to continuous steady state noise. Three groups exposed to impulse noise, one group exposed to continuous steady state noise, and an unexposed control group were studied. The hearing thresholds of the groups were measured by a puretone audiometer three times in two workdays. None of the groups showed significant differences between the hearing thresholds measured in the morning, at midday, and in the afternoon. Group 1 with the shortest duration of exposure and group 2 with the intermediate duration of exposure to impulse noise had the highest thresholds at 6000 Hz in both ears. Group 3 with the longest duration of exposure to impulse noise had the highest thresholds asymmetrically, at 4000 Hz in the left ear and at 6000 Hz in the right ear. The group exposed to continuous steady state noise also had the highest thresholds asymmetrically, in the left ear at 6000 Hz. It was concluded that the longer the duration of exposure to impulse noise the wider the region of the frequencies that showed raised threshold shifts in both ears. Impulse noise seemed to produce permanent threshold shifts at 4000 and 6000 Hz after a shorter duration of exposure than continuous steady state noise.

Full text

PDF
122

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alberti P. W., Symons F., Hyde M. L. Occupational hearing loss. The significance of asymmetrical hearing thresholds. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979 Mar-Apr;87(3-4):255–263. doi: 10.3109/00016487909126417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dieroff H. G. The mechanism of impulse-noise-induced hearing loss in industry and its resulting measurement problems. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1980 Aug;(Suppl 12):249–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GALLO R., GLORIG A. PERMANENT THRESHOLD SHIFT CHANGES PRODUCED BY NOISE EXPOSURE AND AGING. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1964 May-Jun;25:237–245. doi: 10.1080/00028896409342582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hetu R., Parrot J. A field evaluation of noise-induced temporary threshold shift. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978 Apr;39(4):301–311. doi: 10.1080/0002889778507762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mills J. H., Gengel R. W., Watson C. S., Miller J. D. Temporary changes of the auditory system due to exposure to noise for one or two days. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970 Aug;48(2):524–530. doi: 10.1121/1.1912167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nilsson R., Lindgren F. The effect of long term use of hearing protectors in industrial noise. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1980 Aug;(Suppl 12):204–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Robinson D. W., Sutton G. J. Age effect in hearing - a comparative analysis of published threshold data. Audiology. 1979;18(4):320–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rop I., Raber A., Fischer G. H. Study of the hearing losses of industrial workers with occupational noise exposure, using statistical methods for the analysis of qualitative data. Audiology. 1979 May-Jun;18(3):181–196. doi: 10.3109/00206097909081522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schwetz F., Hloch T., Schewczik R. Experimental exposure to impulse noise in the especially pathogenic impact frequency range. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979 Mar-Apr;87(3-4):264–266. doi: 10.3109/00016487909126418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ward W. D. Effects of impulse noise on hearing. Summary and overview. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1980 Aug;(Suppl 12):339–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES