Abstract
Objectives
Chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) is an underdiagnosed but severe condition. Access to functional testing is often limited and the diagnosis is usually based primarily on symptoms and imaging. One of the functional tests available is measurement of the splanchnic blood flow (SBF). The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate if changes in the splanchnic perfusion after revascularization can be detected by measuring the SBF and hepatic vein oxygenation.
Materials and Methods
The SBF was measured in 10 patients before and after revascularization of the mesenteric arteries by either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 9) or open revascularization (n = 1). The SBF was measured indirectly using Fick's principle and using the tracer Tc‐99m Mebrofenin along with assessment of hepatic blood oxygenation, before and after a standard meal, following catheterization of a hepatic vein and the femoral artery.
Results
Nine of 10 patients (90%) achieved a profound increase in SBF after revascularization (mean increase in postprandial response to meal stimulation from 71 ± 95 to 531 ± 295 ml/min, p = 0.001), and an increase in postprandial hepatic vein oxygen saturation (from 52 ± 14% to 59 ± 13%, p = 0.006). The symptoms of the patients diminished accordingly. One patient had no symptom relief, and no increase in postprandial SBF, but an angiographic result with no significant stenosis postrevascularization.
Conclusions
Revascularization increased the SBF and hepatic vein oxygen saturation significantly concurrent with symptom relief and according with the angiographic successful result in the vast majority of patients. A satisfying angiographic result post vascular intervention does not rule out CMI.
Keywords: angiography; atherosclerosis; chronic mesenteric ischaemia; clinical laboratory techniques, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, splanchnic blood flow
1. INTRODUCTION
The symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) are often equivocal but frequently consist of postprandial abdominal pain, weight loss and diarrhoea. Due to the nonspecific clinical findings CMI may be a challenge to diagnose (Kolkman & Geelkerken, 2017). CMI involve atherosclerotic, constrictive or microvascular lesions, which give rise to decreased mesenteric perfusion due to vessel stenosis (Thomas et al., 1998). However, asymptomatic mesenteric artery stenosis are common in the general population (Bjorck et al., 2017). The abundant collateral circulation between the coeliac artery, the superior mesenteric artery and the inferior mesenteric artery may be an explanation (Acosta, 2010). Earlier it was proposed that CMI is unlikely unless at least two of the three vessel need to have a haemodynamic significant stenosis limiting the splanchnic blood flow (SBF) (Brandt & Boley, 2000). However, CMI can also arise from single‐vessel mesenteric artery disease and studies have reported symptom relief in the majority of these patients after intervention (Altintas et al., 2021; L.J.D. van Dijk et al., 2018; Høyer et al., 2022; Mensink et al., 2006). There are only a few methods available for functional testing such as tonometry or visible light spectroscopy based on endoscopy or indirect measurement of the SBF via catheterization of the hepatic vein (Terlouw et al., 2020). The findings in patients with CMI is usually an insufficient SBF increase to meal stimulation along with a drop in hepatic vein oxygenation. Due to limited access to function testing, the diagnosis of CMI are in most vascular centres primarily based on symptoms together with a finding of mesenteric artery stenosis, and ruling out other possible explanations for the symptoms by for example, endoscopy and imaging (Altintas et al., 2021).
The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate if improvement in the splanchnic perfusion after revascularization of the mesenteric vessels in patients with CMI can be detected by measuring the SBF and hepatic vein oxygenation concomitant with symptom relief.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Design
Prospective single‐blinded comparative trial.
2.2. Subjects
Patients undergoing revascularization of the mesenteric arteries at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Denmark following diagnosis of CMI by measurement of the SBF at the Department of Clinical Physiology, Viborg Regional Hospital were invited to participate in the trial. The eligibility criteria were patients >18 years with mental capacity for complying with study procedure, and willing to have measurement of SBF performed following revascularization. A total of 10 patients were included (2008−2017). The patients were reinvestigated at least 5 weeks after revascularization. The median time between baseline and postinterventional SBF measurement of was 84 days (range 35−335 days). Exclusion criteria were patients with previous revascularization of the mesenteric vessels or patients not able to ingest the test meal. The study was approved by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and all patients provided signed informed consent.
2.3. Experimental procedure
The method for measuring the SBF has been described in detail earlier (Zacho & Abrahamsen, 2008). In brief, all investigations were performed in the morning following an overnight fast. Local analgesia was applied in the groin region and a 4 F sheath was inserted in the femoral artery and a 7 F sheath was inserted in the femoral vein. Through the venous sheath a Swan‐Ganz catheter (7 F) was positioned in a hepatic vein under fluoroscopic control. The presence of a portosystemic shunt caused by portal hypertension was excluded by measuring the hepatic vein pressure gradient (Xu et al., 2019).
2.4. Hemodynamic measurements and imaging
The total SBF was measured indirectly via Fick's principle by using a primer followed by constant tracerinfusion with Tc‐99m labelled Mebrofenin (Mebrofenin®; GE Healthcare), as described in previous studies (Zacho & Abrahamsen, 2010). Blood samples were extracted simultaneously from the hepatic vein and femoral artery every 10 min. Following baseline measurements for 1 h, the patients consumed a standard liquid meal of 4000 kJ. After the test meal, the measurement continued for another hour. A normal SBF response to the test meal is an increase of more than 250 ml/min or 30% compared to baseline flow (Zacho, et al., 2013). Finally, a 4 F pigtail catheter was placed in the aorta to allow aorto‐iliac subtraction angiography with anterior and lateral horizontal projections with a pig‐tail catheter positioned appropriately. On average, 12 ml Iomeron (Iomeron® 200 mG iodine/ml; Bracco) was used for each the projection. After completion of the trial all angiographies were reread by a trained vascular radiologist blinded to the clinical data and blinded to the outcome of the SBF measurements. A significant mesenteric artery stenosis was defined as having a vessel stenosis of more than 70% of the vessel diameter (Terlouw et al., 2020).
2.5. Revascularization
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with stenting was performed according to the institutional standards of the Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Denmark as described recently (Altintas et al., 2021). In connection with PTA, a stent was placed in all treated arteries. In 1 patient open surgery with transposition of the superior mesenteric artery with preimplantation into the aorta was necessary.
2.6. Statistical analysis
The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The differences in hemodynamic variables were analysed using a paired t‐test in the case of quantitative variables with approximate normal distribution. A p‐value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 20.0 (SPSS Inc.).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Patients and data sampling
The demographic data before revascularization is presented in Table 1 for the 10 patients which included 4 female patients (40%). All patients had postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss. Eight of the patients (80%) had diarrhoea. Four of the patient (40%) has significant three‐vessel disease, 3 (30%) had two‐vessel disease and 3 (30%) had one‐vessel disease according to the angiography. In 8 of the 10 patients PTA with stenting was performed on a single mesenteric artery. One patient underwent surgical transposition of the superior mesenteric artery intro the aorta, and 1 patient had PTA with stenting of both the coeliac artery and the superior mesenteric artery (Table 2). At follow‐up, 9 of the 10 patients (90%) had an increase in postprandial SBF after revascularization, a concomitant relief of abdominal pain and no longer a significant stenosis on the targeted vessels for revascularization (Table 2). As several significant stenoses were not intervened upon in cases with multivessel disease, 3 patients (30%) had two‐vessel disease and 4 patients had (40%) one‐vessel disease after the revascularization. No complications were registered in relation to the revascularization procedures or the SBF measurements.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics
| N | 10 |
| Female | 4 (40%) |
| Age | 66 ± 13 |
| Height (cm) | 170 ± 8 |
| Weight (kg) | 64 ± 17 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22 ± 5 |
| Weight loss (kg) | 17 ± 9 |
| Postprandial abdominal pain | 10 (100%) |
| Meal induced nausea | 4 (40%) |
| Chronic diarrhoea | 8 (80%) |
| Smokers | 4 (40%) |
| Hypercholesterolaemia | 4 (40%) |
| Arterial hypertension | 5 (50%) |
| Diabetes | 2 (20%) |
| Ischaemic heart disease | 2 (20%) |
| Claudication | 4 (40%) |
| Cerebral ischaemia | 2 (20%) |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Table 2.
Angiography, SBF and hepatic vein oxygen saturation pre and postintervention
| Angiography % stenosis | Intervention | Postprandial increase in SBF (ml/min) | Postprandial increase in HVsat (%) | Symptom relief | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||||
| CA | 100% | nc | PTA of IMA | 79 | 469 | −4% | ‐4% | Yes | |
| Patient 1 | SMA | 100% | nc | ||||||
| IMA | 70%−99% | 0%−10% | |||||||
| CA | 7%−99% | 11%−49% | PTA of CA | 106 | 1000 | −2% | 11% | Yes | |
| Patient 2 | SMA | 0%−10% | nc | ||||||
| IMA | 0%−10% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 70%−99% | 0%−10% | PTA of CA and SMA | −15 | 865 | −2% | −1% | Yes | |
| Patient 3 | SMA | 70%−99% | 0%−10% | ||||||
| IMA | 100% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 100% | nc | PTA of SMA | 102 | 712 | −12% | 0% | Yes | |
| Patient 4 | SMA | 70%−99% | 0%−10% | ||||||
| IMA | 0%−10% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 100% | nc | PTA of SMA | −16 | 274 | −16% | −12% | Yes | |
| Patient 5 | SMA | 70%−99% | 0%−10% | ||||||
| IMA | 50%−69% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 100% | nc | PTA of SMA | 74 | 350 | −3% | 3% | Yes | |
| Patient 6 | SMA | 100% | 0%−10% | ||||||
| IMA | 100% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 50%−69% | nc | PTA of SMA | 56 | 49 | −1% | −2% | No | |
| Patient 7 | SMA | 70%−99% | 0%−10% | ||||||
| IMA | 0%−10% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 100% | nc | Transposition of SMA | 169 | 665 | −8% | 1% | Yes | |
| Patient 8 | SMA | 100% | 0%−10% | ||||||
| IMA | 100% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 70%−99% | nc | PTA of SMA | −90 | 629 | −6% | −5% | Yes | |
| Patient 9 | SMA | 70%−99% | 0%−10% | ||||||
| IMA | 0%−10% | nc | |||||||
| CA | 11%−49% | nc | PTA of SMA | 239 | 300 | 0% | −1% | Yes | |
| Patient 10 | SMA | 70%−99% | 50%−69% | ||||||
| IMA | 11%−49% | nc | |||||||
Abbreviations: CA, coeliac artery; HVsat, hepatic vein oxygen saturation, pre‐ and postrevascularization; IMA, inferior mesenteric artery; nc, no change; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; SBF, splanchnic blood flow; SMA, superior mesenteric artery.
The results of SBF measurements and hepatic vein oxygen saturation before and after revascularization are shown in Table 2. The individual haemodynamic parameters of the 10 patients are listed in Table 3. Nine patients (90%) had an enhancement in postprandial SBF excluding CMI according to the flow criteria. At same time the abdominal pain was abolished. One patient had persistent postprandial abdominal pain and a lack of increase in postprandial SBF, despite a visual radiographic disappearance of the stenosis in the superior mesenteric artery after PTA (patient number 7).
Table 3.
Haemodynamic parameters
| Preintervention | Postintervention | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 10 | |
| SBF fasting [ml/min] | 916 ± 229 | 972 ± 339 | 0.425 |
| SBF postprandial [ml/min] | 987 ± 226 | 1504 ± 567 | 0.004 |
| SBF increase [ml/min] | 71 ± 95 | 531 ± 295 | 0.001 |
| SBF increase [%] | 9 ± 10 | 54 ± 30 | 0.001 |
| HVsat fasting [%] | 58 ± 11 | 60 ± 9 | 0.266 |
| HVsat postprandial [%] | 52 ± 14 | 59 ± 13 | 0.006 |
| HVsat increase [%] | −5 ± 5 | −1 ± 6 | 0.023 |
| VO2 fasting [ml/min] | 49 ± 13 | 48 ± 11 | 0.507 |
| VO2 postprandial [ml/min] | 62 ± 14 | 74 ± 19 | 0.028 |
| VO2 increase [%] | 28 ± 23 | 56 ± 25 | 0.014 |
Abbreviations: HVsat, hepatic vein oxygen saturation; SBF, splanchnic blood flow; VO2, oxygen consumption.
The SBF and hepatic oxygen saturation as a function of time before and after a standard meal both before and after intervention are demonstrated in the Figures 1 and 2, respectively.
Figure 1.

Total splanchnic blood flow (SBF) before and after revascularization with 95% confidence intervals. *p < 0.05.
Figure 2.

Change in hepatic vein oxygen saturation compared to mean fasting values with 95% confidence intervals (n = 10). *p < 0.05.
The changes in SBF as well as the lowest postprandial hepatic vein oxygen saturation before and after intervention are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Changes in fasting SBF (a), postprandial increase in SBF (b) and lowest hepatic vein saturation (c) pre and postrevascularization on a patient basis (n = 10). The patient with no symptom relief is indicated with a full dot. SBF, splanchnic blood flow.
4. DISCUSSION
Ten patients with abdominal pain and weight loss who met the criteria of CMI according to measurements of SBF were revascularised. The vascular intervention increased the SBF and hepatic vein oxygen saturation significantly concurrent with symptom relief and according with the angiographic successful result in the vast majority of patients. The demand for increased oxygen consumption postprandially can be met by either increased SBF, increased oxygen extraction, that is, decrease in hepatic vein oxygen saturation, or a combination of increased SBF and oxygen extraction. The normal physiological response to meal stimulation is an increase in venous blood oxygenation in the hepatic vein due to an abundant splanchnic hyperaemia surpassing the need for oxygen (Zacho et al., 2013). In patients with CMI on the other hand, a gradual decrease in hepatic vein oxygenation is typically seen postprandially (Høyer et al., 2022). In the present study, the majority of the patients had an increase in the postprandial oxygenation after revascularization. In 2 patients, the enhanced SBF did not satisfy the need for extra oxygen in the postprandial state and a slight decrease in hepatic oxygen saturation was seen. Although the postprandial changes in hepatic vein oxygen saturation is a plausible indicator of splanchnic malperfusion, there has not been established clear diagnostic cut‐offs for diagnosis of CMI. The present results are in agreement with an older study from 1977 including 6 patients who had open surgery to achieve revascularization (Hansen et al., 1977).
In 1 patient with unchanged symptoms postintervention with an acceptable visual result on arteriography, the SBF still did not increase and the hepatic vein oxygen saturation remained very low, indicating persistent splanchnic ischaemia. Non‐occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) is suggested to consists of a combination of clinical symptoms of CMI, absence of significant mesenteric artery stenosis and preferably a positive functional test (Harki et al., 2017; Terlouw et al., 2020). The present patient could be a NOMI patient since both clinical symptoms and SBF were unaffected after PTA, although the patient did have a borderline coeliac artery stenosis not intervened upon.
Discrepancies between clinical improvement and angiographic results after vascular intervention are well known due to a high prevalence of asymptomatic mesenteric artery stenosis (L.J.D. van Dijk et al., 2018). In a recent study, a total of 178 CMI patients were subjected to endovascular treatment of the mesenteric arteries (Altintas et al., 2021). Sixty‐seven percent of the patients had a complete relief of symptoms, and 12% had partial clinical improvement after 6 months postintervention. The diagnosis of CMI in that study was based on a combination of clinical symptoms (99.4% suffering from abdominal pain), and the presence of significant mesenteric artery stenosis. Due to the limited availability of functional testing, the diagnose of CMI is usually based primarily on these criteria's. Functional testing may improve the diagnose of CMI as described in guidelines (Bjorck et al., 2017; Terlouw et al., 2020). Several proposals for such tests have been forwarded (Mensink et al., 2008; van Noord et al., 2013; Sana et al., 2015). None, however, with widespread clinical use, due to limited access. Noninvasive methods such as MRI and CT based calcium scoring offer a noninvasive approach, and are also being investigated although their diagnostic potential in CMI remain to be clarified (Hall Barrientos et al., 2021; Terlouw et al., 2021). In contrast to CMI, there is a vast availability of advanced methods for the diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease. It has been well established that insufficient coronary blood flow requiring intervention to improve the prognosis, does not only present itself with classic angina, but also as with vague symptoms such as for example, fatigue or dyspnoea (Neumann et al., 2019). Similarly, there has also been described a broad symptomatology in CMI. The insufficient blood flow can induce symptoms of general bowel dysfunction, not dominated of pain, such as abdominal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea or constipation (L.J. van Dijk et al., 2019; Kolkman & Geelkerken, 2017). Further development of diagnostic modalities for CMI will likely reveal a currently undetected large proportion of patients with atypical CMI symptoms that could benefit from mesenteric artery revascularization to restore bowel function. PTA of the mesenteric arteries in patients falsely diagnosed with CMI should also be avoided, as the procedure is not without risk of complications (Altintas et al., 2021).
The advantage of the present method, as a functional test measuring SBF, despite its cumbersome setup, is that it offers a method that has been demonstrated in the present study and in former studies, to be able to detect flow changes in regard to revascularization (Møller & Madsen, 2002). The disadvantage is its cumbersome work up and a lack of a large scale clinical trials to verify the diagnostic accuracy to predict the outcome of vascular intervention.
5. STUDY LIMITATIONS
Not all patients diagnosed with CMI based on SBF measurement that had revascularization performed in the inclusion period were invited to participate in the trial, due to failure to invite the patients. We found no significant difference in major haemodynamic variables when comparing the included patients at baseline to other patient diagnosed with CMI at our Department in the same period (data not shown) (Høyer et al., 2022). However, the patients enroled in the present trial had a higher mean weight, height and female ratio, which could influence the generalizability of our study.
6. CONCLUSION
Revascularization increased the SBF and hepatic vein oxygen saturation significantly concurrent with symptom relief and according with the angiographic successful result in the vast majority of patients.
As a functional test for the diagnosis of CMI, measurement of the SBF was able to detect the hemodynamic effects of revascularization. A satisfying angiographic result post vascular intervention does not rule out CMI.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the nurses and laboratory technicians involved for their contributions to the study. This study was supported by the Region Midt Research Foundation, the Rosa and Asta Jensen Foundation and the Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation.
Høyer, C. , Zacho, H.D. , Stefanov, V. & Abrahamsen, J. (2023) Improvement of the splanchnic blood flow and hepatic vein oxygenation following revascularization in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 43, 33–39. 10.1111/cpf.12790
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data will be available upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- Acosta, S. (2010) Epidemiology of mesenteric vascular disease: clinical implications. Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 23, 4–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altintas, U. , Lawaetz, M. , de la Motte, L. , Riazi, H. , Lonn, L. , Lindh, M. et al. (2021) Endovascular treatment of chronic and acute on chronic mesenteric ischaemia: results from a national cohort of 245 cases. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 61, 603–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bjorck, M. , Koelemay, M. , Acosta, S. , Bastos Goncalves, F. , Kolbel, T. , Kolkman, J.J. et al. (2017) Editor's choice—management of the diseases of mesenteric arteries and veins: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 53, 460–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandt, L.J. & Boley, S.J. (2000) AGA technical review on intestinal ischemia. American Gastrointestinal Association. Gastroenterology, 118, 954–968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk, L.J. , van Noord, D. , de Vries, A.C. , Kolkman, J.J. , Geelkerken, R.H. , Verhagen, H.J. et al. (2019) Clinical management of chronic mesenteric ischemia. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 7, 179–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk, L.J.D. , Moons, L.M.G. , van Noord, D. , Moelker, A. , Verhagen, H.J.M. , Bruno, M.J. et al. (2018) Persistent symptom relief after revascularization in patients with single‐artery chronic mesenteric ischemia. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 68, 779–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall Barrientos, P. , Knight, K. , Black, D. , Vesey, A. & Roditi, G. (2021) A pilot study investigating the use of 4D flow MRI for the assessment of splanchnic flow in patients suspected of mesenteric ischaemia. Scientific Reports, 11, 5914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, H.J. , Engell, H.C. , Ring‐Larsen, H. & Ranek, L. (1977) Splanchnic blood flow in patients with abdominal angina before and after arterial reconstruction. A proposal for a diagnostic test. Annals of Surgery, 186, 216–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harki, J. , Vergouwe, Y. , Spoor, J.A. , Mensink, P.B. , Bruno, M.J. , van Noord, D. et al. (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of the combination of clinical symptoms and CT or MR angiography in patients with chronic gastrointestinal ischemia. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 51, e39–e47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Høyer, C. , Christensen, M.H. , Sandermann, J. , Leusink, R. & Abrahamsen, J. (2022) Chronic mesenteric ischaemia: the importance of the individual mesenteric artery. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 42, 15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolkman, J.J. & Geelkerken, R.H. (2017) Diagnosis and treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia: an update. Best Practice and Research. Clinical Gastroenterology, 31, 49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mensink, P.B. , Geelkerken, R.H. , Huisman, A.B. , Kuipers, E.J. & Kolkman, J.J. (2008) Twenty‐four hour tonometry in patients suspected of chronic gastrointestinal ischemia. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 53, 133–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mensink, P.B. , van Petersen, A.S. , Geelkerken, R.H. , Otte, J.A. , Huisman, A.B. & Kolkman, J.J. (2006) Clinical significance of splanchnic artery stenosis. British Journal of Surgery, 93, 1377–1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Møller, S. & Madsen, J.L. (2002) Outcome of splanchnic blood flow determination in patients with suspected chronic intestinal ischaemia. A retrospective survey. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14, 1193–1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neumann, F.J. , Sousa‐Uva, M. , Ahlsson, A. , Alfonso, F. , Banning, A.P. , Benedetto, U. et al. Group ESCSD . (2019) 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European Heart Journal, 40, 87–165.30165437 [Google Scholar]
- van Noord, D. , Sana, A. , Moons, L.M. , Pattynama, P.M. , Verhagen, H.J. , Kuipers, E.J. et al. (2013) Combining radiological imaging and gastrointestinal tonometry: a minimal invasive and useful approach for the workup of chronic gastrointestinal ischemia. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 25, 719–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sana, A. , Moons, L.M. , Hansen, B.E. , Dewint, P. , van Noord, D. , Mensink, P.B. et al. (2015) Use of visible light spectroscopy to diagnose chronic gastrointestinal ischemia and predict response to treatment. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 13, 122–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terlouw, L.G. , Moelker, A. , Abrahamsen, J. , Acosta, S. , Bakker, O.J. , Baumgartner, I. et al. (2020) European guidelines on chronic mesenteric ischaemia—joint United European Gastroenterology, European Association for Gastroenterology, Endoscopy and Nutrition, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, Netherlands Association of Hepatogastroenterologists, Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and Dutch Mesenteric Ischemia Study group clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 8(4), 371–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terlouw, L.G. , van Noord, D. , van Walsum, T. , Bruno, M.J. & Moelker, A. (2021) Mesenteric artery calcium scoring: a potential screening method for chronic mesenteric ischemia. European Radiology, 31, 4212–4220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, J.H. , Blake, K. , Pierce, G.E. , Hermreck, A.S. & Seigel, E. (1998) The clinical course of asymptomatic mesenteric arterial stenosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 27, 840–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, G. , Li, F. & Mao, Y. (2019) Portal pressure monitoring‐state‐of‐the‐art and future perspective. Annals of Translational Medicine, 7, 583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zacho, H.D. & Abrahamsen, J. (2008) Chronic intestinal ischaemia: diagnosis. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 28, 71–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zacho, H.D. & Abrahamsen, J. (2010) Functional versus radiological assessment of chronic intestinal ischaemia. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 30, 116–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zacho, H.D. , Henriksen, J.H. & Abrahamsen, J. (2013) Chronic intestinal ischemia and splanchnic blood‐flow: reference values and correlation with body‐composition. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 19, 882–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be available upon reasonable request.
