Abstract
TGF-β signaling is a vital regulator for maintaining articular cartilage homeostasis. Runx transcription factors, downstream targets of TGF-β signaling, have been studied in the context of osteoarthritis (OA). Although Runx partner core binding factor β (Cbfβ) is known to play a pivotal role in chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation, the role of Cbfβ in maintaining articular cartilage integrity remains obscure. This study investigated Cbfβ as a novel anabolic modulator of TGF-β signaling and determined its role in articular cartilage homeostasis. Cbfβ significantly decreased in aged mouse articular cartilage and human OA cartilage. Articular chondrocyte-specific Cbfb-deficient mice (Cbfb△ac/△ac) exhibited early cartilage degeneration at 20 weeks of age and developed OA at 12 months. Cbfb△ac/△ac mice showed enhanced OA progression under the surgically induced OA model in mice. Mechanistically, forced expression of Cbfβ rescued Type II collagen (Col2α1) and Runx1 expression in Cbfβ-deficient chondrocytes. TGF-β1-mediated Col2α1 expression failed despite the p-Smad3 activation under TGF-β1 treatment in Cbfβ-deficient chondrocytes. Cbfβ protected Runx1 from proteasomal degradation through Cbfβ/Runx1 complex formation. These results indicate that Cbfβ is a novel anabolic regulator for cartilage homeostasis, suggesting that Cbfβ could protect OA development by maintaining the integrity of the TGF-β signaling pathway in articular cartilage.
Keywords: articular cartilage, Runx1/Cbfβ complex, osteoarthritis, TGF-β signaling, proteasomal degradation
1. Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common and painful disease of the joints, affects nearly half of the world’s elderly population and represents an enormous socioeconomic challenge [1,2]. OA is a joint disease with structural and functional changes in the articular cartilage, subchondral bone, ligaments, capsule, synovium, sensory nerve endings, meniscus, and periarticular muscles. Among these structural components, many studies focus on cartilage or subchondral bone. With regard to OA initiation, both subchondral bone and articular cartilage changes are critical factors for OA initiation [1,3,4,5]. A dynamic equilibrium between synthesis and degradation of the extracellular matrix, such as Col2α1, proteoglycans, and Mmp13, controls articular cartilage homeostasis and integrity [4]. The inactivation of one copy of Col2α1 leads to articular cartilage degeneration and increased OA development [6]. In the early stage of OA, cartilage matrix degradation occurs in the superficial zone of the cartilage but later extends to deeper zones as OA progresses [7]. Mmp13 is a major enzyme that targets the breakdown of cartilage extracellular matrix such as Type II collagen and proteoglycans [8]. A clinical investigation revealed a strong association between articular cartilage destruction and high Mmp13 expression [9].
The tight control of TGF-β signaling plays an essential role in articular cartilage homeostasis [10]. The injection of TGF-β into the knee joint increases proteoglycan, whereas the injection of recombinant soluble TGF-β type II receptor, an endogenous inhibitor, markedly worsens OA phenotypes [11,12]. TGF-β Type I receptor ALK1 (Activin Receptor-like Kinase) correlates well with Mmp13 expression, whereas ALK5 correlates with aggrecan and collagen type II. In senescent and OA articular chondrocytes, ALK5 expression is significantly decreased compared to ALK1, increasing the ALK1/ALK5 ratio, which is associated with the upregulation of Mmp13 in OA [13]. Indeed, the chondrocyte-specific loss of Smad3, ALK5, or the overexpression of dominant-negative TGF-β type II receptor in mice results in OA development at an early stage [14,15]. These findings indicate that abnormal TGF-β signaling increases OA development. Thus, the integrity of the TGF-β signaling pathway is essential for the healthy maintenance of articular cartilage and for preventing OA. Here, we explore the TGF-β signaling integrity regulated by Cbfβ.
Cbfβ is a partner protein of the runt-related transcription factor (Runx) family, which includes Runx1, Runx2, and Runx3. It interacts with the Runt domain of the Runx family to enhance its DNA binding properties and transcription activity [16,17]. Runx1 is a pivotal transcription factor for chondrogenesis, chondrocyte proliferation, and survival. Runx1 in mouse embryonic mesenchymal cells results in a potent induction of early chondrocyte differentiation markers, such as Type II collagen, but not the hypertrophy marker, type X collagen [18]. Runx1 also acts on the superficial zone of articular chondrocytes to stimulate chondrocyte proliferation and promote anabolic protein expression to maintain articular cartilage integrity [19]. Deletion or carboxyl terminus truncation of Runx2 inhibits endochondral bone formation with the arrest of chondrocyte maturation, resulting in the complete absence of mature osteoblast formation [20,21,22]. Runx2 and Runx3 are both expressed in cartilaginous condensations of the mouse limb. The cooperative roles of these two proteins in mediating chondrocyte maturation, hypertrophy, and cartilage formation have been established in vivo using double-knockout mice [23]. The homozygous deletion of Cbfb in mice causes embryonic lethality during pregnancy due to brain hemorrhage and reduces Runx1 stability and transcriptional activity to block fetal hepatic hematopoiesis [24,25]. Cbfβ plays an essential role in endochondral bone formation through skeletal tissue cell-type-specific Cbfb deletions, including mesenchymal cells [26,27], chondrocytes [28,29], and osteoblasts [30]. Since articular chondrocytes remain as non-hypertrophied hyaline cartilage during development, it is interesting to determine how the joint degenerates and progresses to OA as the articular chondrocytes die prematurely or undergo abnormal hypertrophy [7]. However, the role of Cbfβ during articular cartilage development and the evolution of OA is not well understood.
To determine the function of Cbfβ in articular cartilage and its effect on the development of OA, we analyzed the results of the deletion of Cbfb from articular chondrocytes using Gdf5-Cre and Cbfb-floxed mice together with a surgically induced OA model.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Antibodies and Reagents
Antibodies and reagents are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Reagent Type | Designation | Identifiers |
---|---|---|
Antibody | Anti-p-Smad3 (rabbit polyclonal) | Cell Signaling Technology #9520 |
Antibody | Anti-smad3 (rabbit polyclonal) | Cell Signaling Technology #9513 |
Antibody | Anti-Cbfβ (rabbit polyclonal) | Santa Cruz #20693 |
Antibody | Anti-β-actin (mouse monoclonal) | Santa Cruz #47778 |
Antibody | Anti-Col2α1 (rabbit polyclonal) | Abcam #53047 |
Antibody | Anti-Runx1 (mouse monoclonal) | Santa Cruz #365644 |
Antibody | Anti-Myc-Tag (rabbit polyclonal) | Abcam #9106 |
Antibody | Anti-Myc-Tag (mouse monoclonal) | Invitrogen #P/N46-0603 |
Antibody | Anti-Flag-Tag (mouse monoclonal) | Sigma #F1804 |
Antibody | Anti-Mmp13 (mouse monoclonal) | Calbiochem #IM-78 |
Protein ladder | Protein marker | Dokdo-1032 |
Chemical compound, drug | Type IV collagenase | Gibco # 9001-12-1 |
Chemical compound, drug | Lipofectamine 2000 | Invitrogen #11668019 |
Chemical compound, drug | Hematoxylin | Sigma-Aldrich #H9627 |
Chemical compound, drug | Fast green | Sigma-Aldrich #F7258 |
Chemical compound, drug | Ferric chloride | Junsei #18510S0301 |
Chemical compound, drug | Safranin O | Sigma-Aldrich #S-2255 |
Chemical compound, drug | Mammalian cell lysis buffer | Thermo Fisher Scientific #78501 |
Chemical compound, drug | Easy-Blue solution | iNtRON #17061 |
Chemical compound, drug | DAB substrate-chromogen system | Dakocytomation #K3468 |
Chemical compound, drug | Bovine Serum Albumin | Sigma-Aldrich #A9418 |
Chemical compound, drug | 4% Paraformaldehyde | Biosolution #BP031 |
Chemical compound, drug | Mayor’s Hematoxylin | Muto pure chemicals #3000-2 |
Chemical compound, drug | Eosin | Muto pure chemicals #3200-2 |
Chemical compound, drug | Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid | Junsei #17388-0401 |
Recombinant protein | IL-1β | R&D Systems #401-ML |
Recombinant protein | TNF-α | R&D Systems #410-MT |
Recombinant protein | Tgf-β1 | R&D Systems #7666-MB |
2.2. Mice and Experimental OA
Mice harboring an articular chondrocyte-specific deletion of Cbfb (CbfbΔac/Δac) were established by crossing Gdf5-Cre transgenic mice (CreTg/+, kindly provided by Dr. David M Kingsley from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA) [31] with Cbfbfl/fl mice [32], both maintained on a C57BL/6N background. The loxP sites of the Cbfbfl/fl mice encompass exon 5 of Cbfβ, resulting in articular chondrocyte-specific deletion of exon 5 in Cbfb△ac/△ac mice. Cbfbfl/fl served as wild-type control (WT). In twelve-week-old male mice, the destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) surgery was conducted in both knees, and mice were sacrificed at 8 weeks after DMM surgery to assess OA progression (each group n = 6) [33]. We used twelve-month-old male mice for spontaneous OA progression analysis (WT = 5, Cbfb△ac/△ac = 5). All animal procedures followed the guidelines issued by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyungpook National University (KNU-201455).
2.3. Human Subjects
Human OA articular cartilage tissues were obtained from OA surgery patients through total knee arthroplasty. The Institutional Review Board of Kyungpook National University Hospital approved using human OA cartilage. We obtained written informed consent from all patients prior to the surgical procedure (IRB File No of KNUH 2022-01-010-001). The human sample list is described in Table 2.
Table 2.
No. | Age | Gender | ICRS Grade | Joint | Weight (kg) | Height (cm) |
RA | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 65 | F | 4 | Knee | 66 | 158 | X | heart valve disease |
2 | 76 | F | 4 | Knee | 71 | 155 | X | HTN, DM, unstable angina, asthma |
3 | 64 | M | 3 | Knee | 67 | 168 | X | HTM |
4 | 83 | F | 4 | Knee | 55 | 151 | X | HTN |
5 | 76 | F | 3 | Knee | 55 | 155 | X | HTN, DM |
6 | 71 | F | 4 | Knee | 70 | 159 | X | HTM, DM, AF |
F, Female. M, Male. ICRS, International Cartilage Repair Society. RA, rheumatoid arthritis. HTN, hypertension. DM, diabetes mellitus. AF, Atrial fibrillation.
2.4. β-Galactosidase (β-gal) Staining
Whole tissues were fixed for 30 min in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ethylene glycol tetra-acetic acid (EGTA), then washed for 30 min with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer. Tissues were kept in the X-gal staining solution overnight at 37 °C and then washed briefly in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). We made cryosections of the stained samples, fixed the slides briefly in 4% PFA, washed them in PBS, and counterstained them with Nuclear Fast Red (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Samples were washed in PBS and analyzed with a Leica microscope [34].
2.5. Assessment of OA Severity
Knee joints were fixed with 4% PFA and decalcified with 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; pH 7.4) for 4 weeks. Decalcified tissues were dehydrated by ethanol, embedded in paraffin, and then sectioned with a thickness of 3 μm. We performed Safranin-O staining as in the previous study [5]. Briefly, sections were treated in the following order: deparaffinization, rehydration, and soaking in Weigert’s iron hematoxylin solution for 10 min each, followed by fast green solution and 0.1% Safranin-O solution for 5 min each. Assigning OA progression followed the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) diagnosis criteria [5].
2.6. Immunohistochemistry
We quenched the sections with 3% H2O2 and retrieved antigens by boiling them in TEG buffer (1.211 g of Tris and 0.190 g of EGTA in 1 L of MilliQ-water, pH 9.0). After blocking with 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature, sections were incubated with anti-Cbfβ, anti-Runx1, anti-Type II collagen, and anti-Mmp13 antibodies overnight at 4 °C and incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated HRP for 1 h. Signals developed with a DAB substrate-chromogen system (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA).
2.7. Cell Culture
Primary articular chondrocytes were derived from the hindlimb knee joint of wild-type and Cbfβ△ac/△ac mice on postnatal day 5, as previously described [35]. Chondrocytes were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Lonza, ME, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and the appropriate penicillin/streptomycin. Chondrogenic ATDC5 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Lonza) medium supplemented with 5% FBS, 10 μg/mL human transferrin, and 3 × 10−8 M sodium selenite. Chondrocytes were plated at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well on 6-well plates for drug treatment. Protein or total RNA was isolated from chondrocytes after 24 h treatment with TGF-β1 (1, 10, or 100 ng/mL), IL-1β (10 ng/mL), or TNF-α (10 ng/mL).
2.8. Western Blot Analyses
Total protein lysates were isolated from human OA articular cartilage, mouse tibia articular cartilage of 12-month-old mice, and articular chondrocytes derived from articular cartilage by M-PER™ Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) containing a cocktail of protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors. Proteins were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Western blots were performed using the indicated antibodies [36].
2.9. qRT-PCR Analyses
Total RNAs were isolated from hind-limb articular cartilage of 12-month-old mice or primary cultured articular chondrocytes using the easy-BLUE Total RNA Extraction Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) and cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, CA, USA). qRT-PCR was performed using the Power SYBR green master mixture (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The qRT-PCR primers were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems). Sequences of qRT-PCR primers are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Target Gene | Forward Sequence | Reverse Sequence |
---|---|---|
Gapdh | GCATCTCCCTCACAATTTCCA | GTGCAGCGAACTTTATTGATGG |
Cbfb | TATGGGTTGCCTGGAGTT TG | AAGGCCTGTTGTGCTAATGC |
Col2α1 | TTCCACTTCAGCTATGGCGA | GACGTTAGCGGTGTTGGGAG |
Aggrecan | GAGAGAGGCGAATCGAACGA | CGTGAAGGGCAGCTGGTAAT |
Mmp9 | AAACCAGACCCCAGACTCCTC | GAGGACACAGTCTGACCTGAA |
Mmp13 | GCCAGAACTTCCCAACCATG | TCAGAGCCCAGAATTTTCTCC |
Mmp14 | GGATGGACACAGAGAACTTCGTG | CGAGAGGTAGTTCTGGGTTGAG |
Mmp15 | CTGAGCAGCTATGGCACAGACA | TGCTGTGTCTCCTCGTTGAAGC |
IL-6 | TTGCCTTCTTGGGACTGATG | CTGAAGGACTCTGGCTTTGT |
IL-17 | CTCAAAGCTCAGCGTGTCCAAACA | TATCAGGGTCTTCATTGCGGTGGA |
IL-18 | CAGGCCTGACATCTTCTGCAA | TTTGATGTAAGTTAGTGAGAGTGA |
IL-22 | GGTGACGACCAGAACATCCA | GACGTTAGCTTCTCACTTTCCTT |
2.10. Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) Assay
Primary articular chondrocytes were plated at a density of 2 × 106 cells/well in 100 mm plates for transfection experiments. Cells were transfected with 10 μg of DNA, including 5 μg of the pcDNA3.1-myc-Cbfβ and 5 μg of pCS4-2Flag-Runx1 by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and grown for 24 h. Cell lysates (400 μg) were bound with anti-Myc at 4 °C overnight with gentle agitation, then incubated with 0.1 g of Sepharose A beads (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) in lysis buffer for 2 h at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Mixtures were washed with lysis buffer five times, and proteins were eluted by boiling with 50 μL of protein loading buffer. Co-IP was performed using Western blotting with anti-Myc or anti-Flag antibody [37].
2.11. Poly-Ubiquitination Assay
ATDC5 chondrocytes were transfected with 12 μg of DNA, including 4 μg of pCS4-Flag-Runx1, 4 μg of pcDNA3.1-HA-Ubiquitin, and 4 μg of pCS4-Myc-Cbfβ by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and grown for 24 h. After 24 h from transfection, cells were incubated with 20 μm of MG132 for 2 h. Cell lysates (400 μg) were allowed to bind with anti-Flag antibody at 4 °C overnight with gentle agitation, then incubated with 0.1 g of Sepharose A beads (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) in lysis buffer for 2 h at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Proteins were eluted by boiling with 50 μL of protein loading buffer. Ubiquitination levels were evaluated with a Western blot with anti-HA antibody [37].
2.12. Statistical Analyses
We used GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) for statistical analysis. A paired or unpaired Student’s t-test was used to analyze statistically significant comparisons between the two groups. We considered p < 0.05 to be statistically significant (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01), and ns represents no statistical significance. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or mean ± SE.
3. Results
3.1. Cbfβ was Enhanced by Anabolism and Suppressed by Catabolism
To assess the involvement of Cbfβ in articular cartilage metabolism, we analyzed the expression of Cbfβ under TGF-β1, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), or TNF-α activation. Treatment with various concentrations (1, 10, and 100 ng/mL) of TGF-β1, one of the pivotal anabolic factors in articular cartilage, increased p-Smad3 and Cbfβ protein levels in the articular chondrocytes (Figure 1a). TGF-β1 also increased the mRNA expression of Cbfβ, Type II collagen, and Aggrecan (Figure 1b). The pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β or TNF-α decreased Cbfβ expression along with Type II collagen and Aggrecan, while Mmp13 expression increased in primary cultured mouse articular chondrocytes (Figure 1c). We confirmed that Cbfβ decreased under IL-1β or TNF-α treatment in the fluorescent staining (Figure 1d). Moreover, Cbfβ silencing in chondrocytes upregulated the expression of Mmps such as Mmp9, Mmp13, Mmp14, and Mmp15, and inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-17, IL-18, and IL-22 in the chondrocytes (Supplementary Figure S1a,b). Taken together, Cbfβ expression was enhanced by anabolism and suppressed by catabolism in the articular chondrocytes.
3.2. Cbfβ Loss Is Involved in Articular Cartilage Degeneration
We then investigated whether there was a correlation between Cbfβ expression and articular cartilage degeneration in vivo. Aged articular cartilage reduced Cbfβ and its partner protein Runx1, but the expression of Runx2 and Runx3 was not significantly different compared to the young articular cartilage (Figure 1e). Moreover, the expression of Cbfβ decreased in mouse (Figure 1f) and human osteoarthritic cartilage (Figure 1g). These results suggest that a loss of Cbfβ may be involved in articular cartilage degeneration. Next, we investigated Cbfβ functions in joint development using articular-cartilage-specific Cbfb deleted Gdf5-Cre; Cbfβfl/fl (Cbfb△ac/△ac) mice. With Rosa26 reporter (R26R), mice Gdf5-Cre activities were explicitly observed in the articular cartilage through β-galactosidase staining (Supplementary Figure S2a), with around 75% deletion in articular cartilage by qRT- PCR (Supplementary Figure S2b) and immunofluorescent staining in E16.5 (Supplementary Figure S2c,d) and 20-week-old (Supplementary Figure S1e). Cbfb△ac/△ac mice displayed typical joint and cartilage formation at E14.5 and E16.5 embryonic stages (Figure 2a,b). To further understand the effect of Cbfβ on articular cartilage homeostasis, we performed an articular cartilage integrity assessment with the histochemical analysis of 12-month-old mouse joints. Cbfb△ac/+ mice displayed higher OARSI scores than WT mice but without statistical significance. However, Cbfb△ac/△ac mice exhibited high OARSI scores with severe cartilage destruction (Figure 2c,d). Cbfβ, Aggrecan, and Col2α1 mRNAs decreased, whereas Mmp13 expression increased in the articular cartilage of 12-month-old Cbfb△ac/△ac mice (Figure 2e). These results indicate that Cbfβ physiologically protects articular cartilage during aging and that the deletion of Cbfb causes age-dependent spontaneous OA progression.
3.3. Genetic Deletion of Cbfb Accelerated OA Progression
Cbfβ deficiency induced spontaneous OA development and presumably accelerated knee joint degradation in a surgically induced OA model. To explore this idea using a DMM surgery-induced mouse OA model, we confirmed the Cbfb△ac/△ac mouse joints’ OA progression. Safranin O staining and scoring using the OARSI method revealed that Cbfb△ac/△ac mouse joints induced severe damage to articular cartilage compared with controls. Indeed, Cbfb△ac/△ac mouse joints, even the sham group, showed more cartilage degeneration with a higher OARSI score than WT mice at 20 weeks (Figure 3a,b). Immunohistochemical staining showed reduced articular cartilage proteins that provide protection, such as Runx1 and Col2α1 (Figure 3c). Conversely, the matrix-degrading enzyme Mmp13 increased on the articular surface of Cbfb△ac/△ac mice compared to those of WT mice (Figure 3c). TGF-β is one of the most critical anabolic regulators for articular cartilage integrity. Hence, we determined whether Cbfβ could modulate TGF-β signaling in the Cbfb△ac/△ac mouse articular cartilage. In fluorescence staining, the signal of p-Smad3 unexpectedly increased in the Cbfb△ac/△ac mouse articular cartilage (Figure 3d,e). These data raised an additional question as to why TGF-β signaling activation could not increase Type II collagen expression in Cbfb△ac/△ac mouse articular cartilage.
3.4. Cbfβ Modulates Articular Cartilage Integrity by Modulating TGF-β Signaling
To clarify how Cbfβ is involved in the TGF-β1-mediated Type II collagen expression, we performed a TGF-β1-responsive assay in the Cbfβ-deleted chondrocytes. Interestingly, TGF-β1 treatment increased p-Smad3 in the Cbfb△ac/△ac articular chondrocytes compared to Cbfβfl/fl cells (Figure 4a). Consistent with in vivo data, TGF-β1-mediated Cbfβ and Col2α1 (Type II collagen) expression were reduced in Cbfb△ac/△ac articular chondrocytes compared with Cbfβfl/fl (Figure 4b,c). These results indicate that Cbfβ plays an essential role in maintaining TGF-β signaling pathway integrity in the articular cartilage.
3.5. Cbfβ Stabilizes Runx1 in Articular Chondrocytes
Runx1, Runx2, and Runx3 are crucial targets of TGF-β superfamily signaling [38]. Runx1 is a central regulator of articular cartilage integrity by coordinating YAP, TGF-β, and Wnt signaling in articular cartilage formation and maintenance by enhancing Type II collagen and matrix production in collaboration with Sox trios [39]. We, therefore, hypothesized that Runx1 proteolysis resulted in accelerated cartilage degeneration in the Cbfβ-deleted articular chondrocytes [40]. The levels of Runx1 and Col2α1 were reduced in Cbfβ-deleted articular chondrocytes from Cbfb△ac/△ac mice, whereas the rescue of Cbfβ in Cbfb-deleted articular chondrocytes restored Runx1 and Col2α1 (Figure 5a,b). To further investigate the effects of Cbfβ on Runx1 stability in articular chondrocytes, we performed co-immunoprecipitation and poly-ubiquitination (Figure 5c). In articular chondrocytes, Cbfβ can endogenously bind Runx1 and protect Runx1 from polyubiquitination-mediated proteasomal degradation (Figure 5c,d). These results suggest that Cbfβ makes a complex with Runx1, stabilizing Runx1 in articular chondrocytes.
4. Discussion
In this study, we found that the articular-cartilage-specific deletion of Cbfβ resulted in spontaneous OA development and exacerbated OA progression in the surgically induced DMM model. The expression of Cbfβ decreased with aging and OA progression in articular cartilage, and only Runx1 among the Runx transcription factors was downregulated in response to a decrease in Cbfβ (Figure 1c,d). The absence or rescue of Cbfβ in Cbfb-deleted articular chondrocytes determined the levels of Runx1 and the Cbfβ/Runx1 complex as well as Col2α1, indicating that Cbfβ/Runx1 complex formation plays a crucial role in maintaining articular cartilage homeostasis. Moreover, Cbfβ as a component of the Cbfβ/Runx1 complex was a key regulator of TGF-β signaling, with the modulation of p-Smad3 in Cbfb-deleted articular chondrocytes. Proper Cbfβ/Runx1 complex formation via TGF-β signaling is vital for maintaining normal articular chondrocyte functional integrity and preventing degenerative cartilage diseases of joints such as OA.
The physiological maintenance of articular cartilage requires tight control of the TGF-β signaling pathway [10]. Our study demonstrates the critical role of Cbfβ and Runx1 as a mediator of TGF-β signaling (Figure 5e). First, Cbfβ and Runx1, like various components of the TGF-β signaling pathway, such as the ALK1/ALK5 ratio [13], decreased with aging and OA progression. The activation of TGF-β signaling increased Cbfβ and Runx1 expression and Cbfβ/Runx1 complex formation. The deletion of Cbfβ attenuated the activation of the TGF-β signaling pathway; however, the forced expression of Cbfβ recovered Runx1 and Col2α1 (Type II collagen) expression in Cbfβ-deficient chondrocytes. Moreover, the deletion of Cbfβ increased p-Smad3 in the articular cartilage of Cbfb△ac/△ac mice. The increase in p-Smad3 may result from the regulatory role of the negative feedback loop in the TGF-β signaling pathway. Unknown factors regulated by or involved in the Cbfβ/Runx1 complex in articular chondrocytes need further studies.
Several studies have suggested the contributions of Runx transcription factors to OA. For example, Runx1 contributes to articular cartilage maintenance by increasing cartilage matrix production and inhibiting hypertrophic differentiation [40,41]. Another study suggests that the small-molecule KGN binds to filamin A, a cytoplasmic sequestrant of Cbfβ, releasing Cbfβ from filamin A, which translocates Cbfβ to the nucleus and binds to Runx1 but not Runx2 of articular chondrocytes [42]. Runx1 is known to stimulate the differentiation of mesenchymal cells into chondrocytes by regulating the expression of Type II collagen rather than type X collagen, a hypertrophy marker [18,42]. This study showed that Cbfβ levels correlated well with Runx1 but not with Runx2 and Runx3. In aged articular cartilage, Cbfβ and Runx1 decreased, but Runx2 and Runx3 did not, which also correlated well with the articular cartilage phenotype of Cbfb△ac/△ac mice. Our studies revealed that disruption of TGF-β signaling by deletion of Cbfβ in articular chondrocytes increased catabolic cytokines and enzymes such as IL-6, IL-17, IL-18, IL-22, Mmp 9, Mmp 13, Mmp14, and Mmp15. Therefore, the positive relationship of the Cbfβ/Runx1 complex with Type II collagen is essential to the TGF-β signaling pathway in articular cartilage integrity.
Regarding Runx2 and Runx3, Runx2 is negligibly expressed, while Runx3 is comparable to Runx1 in articular cartilage. Our study showed that diminished Runx1 correlated well with the level of Cbfβ, whereas increased Runx2 and Runx3 in the human OA samples did not. Our previous studies showed the protection of Runx2 by Cbfβ in both chondrocytes and osteoblasts [29,30], suggesting the presence of differential heterodimerization of Cbfβ with Runx transcription factors in skeletal tissues. Some cases of OA upregulate Runx2 with a transition from articular chondrocytes to hypertrophic chondrocytes [43]. Runx2 haploinsufficient mice show delayed OA progression after the induction of knee joint instability [44]. Additionally, the deletion of Runx2 in articular chondrocytes slows the progression of surgery-induced OA [45]. Chondrocyte-specific Runx2 overexpression accelerates OA progression [46]. These studies indicate a positive relationship between OA progression and aberrant expression of Runx2 in articular chondrocytes. However, the Cbfβ investigation showed that Runx1, but not Runx2 or Runx3, was primarily involved in the aggravated OA phenotype in the DMM model and Cbfβ-deleted spontaneous OA and human OA samples. Thus, the local upregulation of Cbfβ expression using various methods, including small molecules, AAV vectors, or other mRNA gene delivery systems in joints, might play a critical role in protecting and delaying cartilage degeneration, which is expected to provide a therapeutic method for OA treatment [47].
This study has a few limitations. How the deletion of Cbfβ increased p-Smad3 in the articular cartilage of Cbfb△ac/△ac mice in vivo and primary chondrocytes in vitro is still unclear. P-Smad3 upregulation may result from the negative feedback loop in the TGF-β signaling pathway or a compensatory mechanism. Unknown factors regulated by or involved in the Cbfβ/Runx1 complex in articular chondrocytes need further studies.
5. Conclusions
In this study, the deletion of Cbfβ in articular cartilage decreased Runx1 and Type II collagen, which enhanced OA progression spontaneously in Cbfb△ac/△ac mice. These results indicate that Cbfβ regulates Runx1 protein stability and subsequently modulates Runx1 target genes, such as Type II collagen, in the articular cartilage. Our findings indicate that Cbfβ prevents articular cartilage destruction by maintaining the integrity of the TGF-β signaling pathway through the stabilization of Runx1.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells12071064/s1, Figure S1: Cbfβ loss induces catabolic factors expression. Figure S2: The Gdf5-Cre transgene is active in articular cartilage.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, X.C., X.J. and J.-Y.C.; methodology, X.C., X.J. and J.-Y.C.; software, X.C. and X.J.; validation, X.C., X.J. and J.-Y.C.; formal analysis, X.C., X.J., H.-J.K. (Hee-June Kim). and H.-S.K.; investigation, X.C. and X.J.; provided human osteoarthritis samples, H.-J.K. (Hee-June Kim) and H.-S.K.; data curation, X.C., X.J., H.-J.K. (Hyun-Ju Kim) and J.-Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-Y.C.; writing—review and editing, X.C., X.J., N.R.P., H.-J.K. (Hee-June Kim), H.-S.K., H.-J.K. (Hyun-Ju Kim), J.B.L., J.L.S. and G.S.S.; visualization, X.C., X.J.; supervision, H.-J.K. (Hyun-Ju Kim), J.B.L., J.L.S. and G.S.S.; project administration, X.C., X.J. and J.-Y.C.; funding acquisition, X.C. and J.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyungpook National University (KNU-201455). Human OA articular cartilage tissues were obtained from OA surgery patients through total knee arthroplasty. The Institutional Review Board of Kyungpook National University Hospital approved the use of human OA cartilage, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the surgical procedure (IRB File No of KNUH 2022-01-010-001).
Informed Consent Statement
The Institutional Review Board of Kyungpook National University Hospital approved the use of human OA cartilage, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the surgical procedure (IRB File No of KNUH 2022-01-010-001).
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name “Cells-GDF5-CBFB-Figures” and “Cells-GDF5-CBFB-Figures-Raw data”] at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HzhIw0tjK9N0jeBtw1cG54rShhClxZLh (accessed on 13 February 2023).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07043598 and NRF-2021R1I1A1A01047403) and the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2017R1A5A2015391, 2014M3A9D5A01073658). This study was also supported in part by R01DE029311 NIDCR and R01AR039588 NIAMS.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Martel-Pelletier J., Barr A.J., Cicuttini F.M., Conaghan P.G., Cooper C., Goldring M.B., Jones G., Teichtahl A.J., Pelletier J.P. Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16072. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hunter D.J., Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393:1745–1759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhen G., Guo Q., Li Y., Wu C., Zhu S., Wang R., Guo X.E., Kim B.C., Huang J., Hu Y., et al. Mechanical stress determines the configuration of TGFβ activation in articular cartilage. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1706. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21948-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Glyn-Jones S., Palmer A.J., Agricola R., Price A.J., Vincent T.L., Weinans H., Carr A.J. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2015;386:376–387. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60802-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Che X., Chi L., Park C.Y., Cho G.H., Park N., Kim S.G., Lee B.H., Choi J.Y. A novel method to detect articular chondrocyte death during early stages of osteoarthritis using a non-invasive ApoPep-1 probe. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015;17:309. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0832-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hyttinen M.M., Toyras J., Lapvetelainen T., Lindblom J., Prockop D.J., Li S.W., Arita M., Jurvelin J.S., Helminen H.J. Inactivation of one allele of the Type II collagen gene alters the collagen network in murine articular cartilage and makes cartilage softer. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2001;60:262–268. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.3.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goldring S.R., Goldring M.B. Changes in the osteochondral unit during osteoarthritis: Structure, function and cartilage-bone crosstalk. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12:632–644. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li H., Wang D., Yuan Y., Min J. New insights on the MMP-13 regulatory network in the pathogenesis of early osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017;19:248. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1454-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang M., Sampson E.R., Jin H., Li J., Ke Q.H., Im H.J., Chen D. MMP13 is a critical target gene during the progression of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013;15:R5. doi: 10.1186/ar4133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thielen N.G.M., Neefjes M., Vitters E.L., van Beuningen H.M., Blom A.B., Koenders M.I., van Lent P.L.E.M., van de Loo F.A.J., Blaney Davidson E.N., van Caam A.P.M., et al. Identification of Transcription Factors Responsible for a Transforming Growth Factor-β-Driven Hypertrophy-like Phenotype in Human Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes. Cells. 2022;11:1232. doi: 10.3390/cells11071232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van Beuningen H.M., van der Kraan P.M., Arntz O.J., van den Berg W.B. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 stimulates articular chondrocyte proteoglycan synthesis and induces osteophyte formation in the murine knee joint. Lab. Investig. 1994;71:279–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Scharstuhl A., Glansbeek H.L., van Beuningen H.M., Vitters E.L., van der Kraan P.M., van den Berg W.B. Inhibition of endogenous TGF-beta during experimental osteoarthritis prevents osteophyte formation and impairs cartilage repair. J. Immunol. 2002;169:507–514. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blaney Davidson E.N., Remst D.F., Vitters E.L., van Beuningen H.M., Blom A.B., Goumans M.J., van den Berg W.B., van der Kraan P.M. Increase in ALK1/ALK5 ratio as a cause for elevated MMP-13 expression in osteoarthritis in humans and mice. J. Immunol. 2009;182:7937–7945. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Serra R., Johnson M., Filvaroff E.H., LaBorde J., Sheehan D.M., Derynck R., Moses H.L. Expression of a truncated, kinase-defective TGF-beta type II receptor in mouse skeletal tissue promotes terminal chondrocyte differentiation and osteoarthritis. J. Cell Biol. 1997;139:541–552. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.2.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang X., Chen L., Xu X., Li C., Huang C., Deng C.X. TGF-beta/Smad3 signals repress chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation and are required for maintaining articular cartilage. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:35–46. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Speck N.A., Terryl S. A new transcription factor family associated with human leukemias. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 1995;5:337–364. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v5.i3-4.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bae S.C., Ito Y. Regulation mechanisms for the heterodimeric transcription factor, PEBP2/CBF. Histol. Histopathol. 1999;14:1213–1221. doi: 10.14670/HH-14.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Y., Belflower R.M., Dong Y.F., Schwarz E.M., O’Keefe R.J., Drissi H. Runx1/AML1/Cbfa2 mediates onset of mesenchymal cell differentiation toward chondrogenesis. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:1624–1636. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.LeBlanc K.T., Walcott M.E., Gaur T., O’Connell S.L., Basil K., Tadiri C.P., Mason-Savas A., Silva J.A., van Wijnen A.J., Stein J.L., et al. Runx1 Activities in Superficial Zone Chondrocytes, Osteoarthritic Chondrocyte Clones and Response to Mechanical Loading. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015;230:440–448. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Otto F., Thornell A.P., Crompton T., Denzel A., Gilmour K.C., Rosewell I.R., Stamp G.W.H., Beddington R.S.P., Mundlos S., Olsen B.R., et al. Cbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Cell. 1997;89:765–771. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80259-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Choi J.Y., Pratap J., Javed A., Zaidi S.K., Xing L., Balint E., Dalamangas S., Boyce B., van Wijnen A.J., Lian J.B., et al. Subnuclear targeting of Runx/Cbfa/AML factors is essential for tissue-specific differentiation during embryonic development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:8650–8655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151236498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Komori T., Yagi H., Nomura S., Yamaguchi A., Sasaki K., Deguchi K., Shimizu Y., Bronson R.T., Gao Y.-H., Inada M., et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997;89:755–764. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80258-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yoshida C.A., Yamamoto H., Fujita T., Furuichi T., Ito K., Inoue K., Yamana K., Zanma A., Takada K., Ito Y., et al. Runx2 and Runx3 are essential for chondrocyte maturation, and Runx2 regulates limb growth through induction of Indian hedgehog. Genes Dev. 2004;18:952–963. doi: 10.1101/gad.1174704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang G., Shigesada K., Ito K., Wee H.J., Yokomizo T., Ito Y. Dimerization with PEBP2beta protects RUNX1/AML1 from ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. EMBO J. 2001;20:723–733. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.4.723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang Q., Stacy T., Miller J.D., Lewis A.F., Gu T.L., Huang X., Bushweller J.H., Bories J.C., Alt F.W., Ryan G., et al. The CBFbeta subunit is essential for CBFalpha2 (AML1) function in vivo. Cell. 1996;87:697–708. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81389-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tian F., Wu M., Deng L., Zhu G., Ma J., Gao B., Wang L., Li Y.P., Chen W. Core binding factor beta (Cbfbeta) controls the balance of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation by upregulating Indian hedgehog (Ihh) expression and inhibiting parathyroid hormone-related protein receptor (PPR) expression in postnatal cartilage and bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:1564–1574. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qin X., Jiang Q., Matsuo Y., Kawane T., Komori H., Moriishi T., Ito K., Kawai Y., Rokutanda S., Izumi S., et al. Cbfb regulates bone development by stabilizing Runx family proteins. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2015;30:706–714. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu M., Li Y.P., Zhu G., Lu Y., Wang Y., Jules J., McConnell M., Serra R., Shao J.Z., Chen W. Chondrocyte-specific knockout of Cbfβ reveals the indispensable function of Cbfβ in chondrocyte maturation, growth plate development and trabecular bone formation in mice. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2014;10:861–872. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.8521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Park N.R., Lim K.E., Han M.S., Che X., Park C.Y., Kim J.E., Taniuchi I., Bae S.C., Choi J.Y. Core Binding Factor beta Plays a Critical Role During Chondrocyte Differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016;231:162–171. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lim K.E., Park N.R., Che X., Han M.S., Jeong J.H., Kim S.Y., Park C.Y., Akiyama H., Kim J.E., Ryoo H.M., et al. Core binding factor β of osteoblasts maintains cortical bone mass via stabilization of Runx2 in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015;30:715–722. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rountree R.B., Schoor M., Chen H., Marks M.E., Harley V., Mishina Y., Kingsley D.M. BMP receptor signaling is required for postnatal maintenance of articular cartilage. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Naoe Y., Setoguchi R., Akiyama K., Muroi S., Kuroda M., Hatam F., Littman D.R., Taniuchi I. Repression of interleukin-4 in T helper type 1 cells by Runx/Cbf beta binding to the Il4 silencer. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204:1749–1755. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Glasson S.S., Blanchet T.J., Morris E.A. The surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model of osteoarthritis in the 129/SvEv mouse. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2007;15:1061–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jeong J.H., Jin J.S., Kim H.N., Kang S.M., Liu J.C., Lengner C.J., Otto F., Mundlos S., Stein J.L., van Wijnen A.J., et al. Expression of Runx2 transcription factor in non-skeletal tissues, sperm and brain. J. Cell. Physiol. 2008;217:511–517. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gosset M., Berenbaum F., Thirion S., Jacques C. Primary culture and phenotyping of murine chondrocytes. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:1253–1260. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim H.J., Lee D.K., Jin X., Che X., Ryu S.H., Choi J.Y. Phospholipase D2 controls bone homeostasis by modulating M-CSF-dependent osteoclastic cell migration and microtubule stability. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022;54:1146–1155. doi: 10.1038/s12276-022-00820-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Che X., Park N., Jin X., Jung Y., Han M., Park C., Chun J., Kim S., Jin J., Kim H., et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 2α is a novel inhibitor of chondrocyte maturation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021;236:6963–6973. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ito Y., Miyazono K. RUNX transcription factors as key targets of TGF-beta superfamily signaling. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2003;13:43–47. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(03)00007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang Y., Zuo T., McVicar A., Yang H., Li Y., Chen W. Runx1 is a key regulator of articular cartilage homeostasis by orchestrating YAP, TGFβ, and Wnt signaling in articular cartilage formation and osteoarthritis. Bone Res. 2022;10:63. doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00231-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yano F., Ohba S., Murahashi Y., Tanaka S., Saito T., Chung U.I. Runx1 contributes to articular cartilage maintenance by enhancement of cartilage matrix production and suppression of hypertrophic differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:7666. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43948-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhou C., Cui Y., Yang Y., Guo D., Zhang D., Fan Y., Li X., Zou J., Xie J. Runx1 protects against the pathological progression of osteoarthritis. Bone Res. 2021;9:50. doi: 10.1038/s41413-021-00173-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johnson K., Zhu S., Tremblay M.S., Payette J.N., Wang J., Bouchez L.C., Meeusen S., Althage A., Cho C.Y., Wu X., et al. A stem cell-based approach to cartilage repair. Science. 2012;336:717–721. doi: 10.1126/science.1215157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kawaguchi H. Endochondral ossification signals in cartilage degradation during osteoarthritis progression in experimental mouse models. Mol. Cells. 2008;25:1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kamekura S., Kawasaki Y., Hoshi K., Shimoaka T., Chikuda H., Maruyama Z., Komori T., Sato S., Takeda S., Karsenty G., et al. Contribution of runt-related transcription factor 2 to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in mice after induction of knee joint instability. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2462–2470. doi: 10.1002/art.22041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liao L., Zhang S., Gu J., Takarada T., Yoneda Y., Huang J., Zhao L., Oh C., Li J., Wang B., et al. Deletion of Runx2 in Articular Chondrocytes Decelerates the Progression of DMM-Induced Osteoarthritis in Adult Mice. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:2371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02490-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Catheline S.E., Hoak D., Chang M., Ketz J.P., Hilton M.J., Zuscik M.J., Jonason J.H. Chondrocyte-Specific RUNX2 Overexpression Accelerates Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis Progression in Adult Mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019;34:1676–1689. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dunbar C., High K., Joung J., Kohn D., Ozawa K., Sadelain M. Gene therapy comes of age. Science. 2018;359:eaan4672. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name “Cells-GDF5-CBFB-Figures” and “Cells-GDF5-CBFB-Figures-Raw data”] at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HzhIw0tjK9N0jeBtw1cG54rShhClxZLh (accessed on 13 February 2023).