Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1973 Apr;30(2):187–198. doi: 10.1136/oem.30.2.187

A study of neurosis and occupation

David Ferguson 1
PMCID: PMC1009503  PMID: 4703090

Abstract

Ferguson, D. (1973).British Journal of Industrial Medicine,30, 187-198. A study of neurosis and occupation. Claims that male telegraphists in an Australian communications undertaking were unduly subject to neurosis and certain psychosomatic disorders as a result of the stress of their work were investigated by sickness absence and environmental and prevalence studies. The absence records of all telegraphists in the mainland capital city offices of the undertaking were compared with those of random samples of clerks and mechanics and, because of excess absence among sydney telegraphists, with those of mail sorters in that city. Subsequently, 516 telegraphists, 93% of those available in Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane, and 155 Sydney mail sorters (79% of a sample) were examined medically.

Absence attributed to neurosis was much commoner in telegraphists than in the other occupations in each capital, and in Sydney telegraphists than in those of other capitals. Employees having such absence were more likely than others also to have uncertified and repeated absences, and absence attributed to bronchial and dyspeptic disorder and to injury. One-third (33%) of the 516 telegraphists examined were considered to have or to have had disabling neurosis, the prevalence being much greater in Sydney (44%) than in Melbourne (19%) or Brisbane (26%). The onset, course, associations, and other characteristics of neurosis are described.

There was some evidence that the neurotic employee had increased liability to some other disorders but also that he was more likely to report ill health than others. Interpretation of increased other ill health in neurosis is confounded by the effects of an excess indulgence in habits. An increase in indices of mental stress was noted but some disorders commonly attributed to stress were not unduly prevalent in neurotics. Loss of craft status, monotony, dissatisfaction with job, fear of displacement by machine, group size, and supervisory practices were all thought to predispose to the high prevalence of neurosis in Sydney telegraphists. However, personal and social maladjustment was particularly evident in telegraphists in that city, and the population from which telegraphists were drawn may have been less well adjusted in Sydney than in Melbourne or Brisbane.

Though it was possible in general to characterize the employee liable to neurosis, the predictive power of the characterization would be poor. The disorder followed no one pattern. Rather it appeared to be a collection of clinical syndromes which present as a result of the complex interaction of the personality with multiple factors at work and elsewhere over most of a lifetime. In individual subjects the relationship of stress at work to symptoms was usually ill defined, even in cases in which the identified probable factors were mainly or solely occupational. Nevertheless, there seems much to be gained from the establishment of mental health programmes in industry.

Full text

PDF
187

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANGELERI F., GRANATI A., LENZI R. NEVROSI E LAVORO FEMMINILE NELL'INDUSTRIA. CONTRIBUTO CLINICO. Folia Med (Napoli) 1964 Feb;47:157–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Browne R. C. Automation and stress. J Psychosom Res. 1966 Jul;10(1):73–75. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(66)90139-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CHIESMAN W. E. Absenteeism in industry. C. Clinical aspects of absenteeism. R Soc Health J. 1957 Oct;77(10):681–689. doi: 10.1177/146642405707701014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dirken J. M. Industrial shift work: decrease in well-being and specific effects. Ergonomics. 1966 Mar;9(2):115–124. doi: 10.1080/00140136608964357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HINKLE L. E., Jr, PLUMMER N., WHITNEY L. H. The continuity of patterns of illness and the prediction of future health. J Occup Med. 1961 Sep;3:417–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamilton M. Observer error in psychiatry. Proc R Soc Med. 1968 May;61(5):453–454. doi: 10.1177/003591576806100517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Howell R. W., Crown S. Sickness absence levels and personality inventory scores. Br J Ind Med. 1971 Apr;28(2):126–130. doi: 10.1136/oem.28.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knupfer G., Clark W., Room R. The mental health of the unmarried. Am J Psychiatry. 1966 Feb;122(8):841–851. doi: 10.1176/ajp.122.8.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Köppich A., Preda N., Gavrilescu N., Elias R., Voicu G. Beiträge zum Studium der Atiologie der asthenischen Neurose bei Arbeiterinnen mit vorweiegend nervöser Beanspruchung. Int Arch Arbeitsmed. 1968;24(3):211–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Martinez-O'Ferrall J. A. Circadian rhythms. J Occup Med. 1968 Jun;10(6):305–315. doi: 10.1097/00043764-196806000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McClintock C. G. Group support, satisfaction, and the behaviour profiles of group members. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1965 Sep;4(3):169–174. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1965.tb00459.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PASAMANICK B., ROBERTS D. W., LEMKAU P. V., KRUEGER D. E. A survey of mental disease in an urban population. I. Prevalence by age, sex, and severity of impairment. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1957 Aug;47(8):923–929. doi: 10.2105/ajph.47.8.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Raffle P. A. Human factors in automation. Trans Assoc Ind Med Off. 1965 Jul;15(3):88–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SLATER E. GENETICAL FACTORS IN NEUROSIS. Br J Psychol. 1964 Aug;55:265–269. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SMILEY J. A. A clinical study of a group of accident-prone workers. Br J Ind Med. 1955 Oct;12(4):263–278. doi: 10.1136/oem.12.4.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SMITH J. A. Occupational stress and emotional illness. J Am Med Assoc. 1956 Jul 14;161(11):1038–1040. doi: 10.1001/jama.1956.02970110004002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Semmence A. Rising sickness absence in Great Britain--a general practitioner's view. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1971 Mar;21(104):125–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. TRICE H. M. ALCOHOLIC EMPLOYEES; A COMPARISON OF PSYCHOTIC, NEUROTIC, AND "NORMAL " PERSONNEL. J Occup Med. 1965 Mar;7:94–99. doi: 10.1097/00043764-196503000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor P. J. Individual variations in sickness absence. Br J Ind Med. 1967 Jul;24(3):169–177. doi: 10.1136/oem.24.3.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thurlow H. J. General susceptibility to illness: a selective review. Can Med Assoc J. 1967 Dec 2;97(23):1397–1404. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Trumbull R. Diurnal cycles and work-rest scheduling in unusual environments. Hum Factors. 1966 Oct;8(5):385–398. doi: 10.1177/001872086600800502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WARREN W. A STUDY OF THE ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC IN-PATIENTS AND THE OUTCOME SIX OR MORE YEARS LATER. I. CLINICAL HISTORIES AND HOSPITAL FINDINGS. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1965 May;6(1):1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1965.tb02150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WYATT S., MARRIOTT R. Night work and shift changes. Br J Ind Med. 1953 Jul;10(3):164–172. doi: 10.1136/oem.10.3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES