Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1974 Jul;31(3):185–195. doi: 10.1136/oem.31.3.185

Assessment of radiological progression of simple pneumoconiosis in individual miners

F D K Liddell 1
PMCID: PMC1009583  PMID: 4412101

Abstract

Liddell, F. D. K. (1974).British Journal of Industrial Medicine,31, 185-195. Assessment of radiological progression of simple pneumoconiosis in individual miners. The studies reported aimed to determine the best method of assessing radiological progression of simple pneumoconiosis in the individual, so that his progression score could be related to other known information about him. The main concern was with subjects for whom three serial posteroanterior chest radiographs were available at approximately quinquennial intervals.

As in other investigations, the 12-point scale of the National Coal Board elaboration led to markedly lower observer error and variability than did the 4-point International Labour Office classification, without distorting levels of progression.

Side-by-side reading led to substantially lower observer error and variability than did independent reading. Although the levels of progression in side-by-side reading were on average a little lower than in independent reading, the effect varied between readers and sessions, being frequently reversed.

Of the three possible methods of side-by-side assessment, the only one without contraindictions was that in which all three films for each subject were viewed together, and there were some specific indications for this approach. Viewing only the first and last films led to some loss of information; viewing all three possible pairs was very expensive of time, both in organization and in actual reading, and was not entirely consistent (additive); and disguise of temporal order of the films proved impractical.

It is concluded that the method of choice for assessing progression in the individual from serial films at roughly quinquennial intervals is to view all films together in known temporal order, recording into the most detailed classification available.

Full text

PDF
185

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amandus H. E., Reger R. B., Pendergrass E. P., Dennis J. M., Morgan K. C. The penumoconioses: methods of measuring progression. Chest. 1973 May;63(5):736–743. doi: 10.1378/chest.63.5.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashford J. R., Enterline P. E. Radiologic classification of the pneumoconioses. An Anglo-American radiograph reading exercise and study of the International Labour Office (1958) Classification of the Pneumoconioses. A cooperative study. Arch Environ Health. 1966 Mar;12(3):314–330. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1966.10664378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COCHRANE A. L. The attack rate of progressive massive fibrosis. Br J Ind Med. 1962 Jan;19:52–64. doi: 10.1136/oem.19.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. LIDDELL F. D. AN EXPERIMENT IN FILM READING. Br J Ind Med. 1963 Oct;20:300–312. doi: 10.1136/oem.20.4.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liddell F. D., Lindars D. C. An elaboration of the I.L.O. classification of simple pneumoconiosis. Br J Ind Med. 1969 Apr;26(2):89–100. doi: 10.1136/oem.26.2.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. RAE S., ASHFORD J. R., MORGAN D. C., PASQUAL R. S., PEARSON N. G. A COMPARISON OF SOME ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHS FOR COAL-WORKERS' PNEUMOCONIOSIS. Br J Ind Med. 1963 Oct;20:293–299. doi: 10.1136/oem.20.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rossiter C. E., Bristol L. J., Cartier P. H., Gilson J. G., Grainger T. R., Sluis-Cremer G. K., McDonald J. C. Radiographic changes in chrysotile asbestos mine and mill workers of Quebec. Arch Environ Health. 1972 Jun;24(6):388–400. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1972.10666114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES