Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1988 Sep;45(9):635–639. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.9.635

Reliability of a widely used test of peripheral cutaneous vibration sensitivity and a comparison of two testing protocols.

F E Gerr 1, R Letz 1
PMCID: PMC1009668  PMID: 3179239

Abstract

Quantitative, non-invasive instruments for assessing peripheral sensory function are being used in many epidemiological investigations of workplace hazards. To be useful in this context such tests should have high reliability and short administration time. The reliability and time efficiency of two testing protocols for determining cutaneous vibration sensitivity (vibration threshold) were compared in 22 healthy volunteers. Both methods were administered using a widely used testing device (Vibratron II). The first testing protocol was a two alternative "forced choice" method recommended by the instrument manufacturer. The second protocol was a "yes-no" method of limits procedure. Each subject's dominant index finger was tested with both methods on two occasions to compare their reliability. In these well educated subjects the method of limits procedure was found to be substantially more reliable and was much less time consuming than the recommended forced choice procedure. The simpler method of limits procedure may be preferable to the forced choice method in certain test conditions.

Full text

PDF
635

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Goldberg J. M., Lindblom U. Standardised method of determining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979 Sep;42(9):793–803. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.42.9.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Katims J. J., Naviasky E. H., Ng L. K., Rendell M., Bleecker M. L. New screening device for assessment of peripheral neuropathy. J Occup Med. 1986 Dec;28(12):1219–1221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Muijser H., Hooisma J., Hoogendijk E. M., Twisk D. A. Vibration sensitivity as a parameter for detecting peripheral neuropathy. I. Results in healthy workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986;58(4):287–299. doi: 10.1007/BF00377886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. WETHERILL G. B., LEVITT H. SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1965 May;18:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00689.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES