Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Nov 9;61(49):e202211671. doi: 10.1002/anie.202211671

Crownphyrins: Metal‐Mediated Transformations of the Porphyrin‐Crown Ether Hybrids

Maksym Matviyishyn 1, Agata Białońska 1, Bartosz Szyszko 1,
PMCID: PMC10098552  PMID: 36214485

Abstract

Crownphyrins are hybrid macrocycles combining structural features of porphyrin and crown ethers. The molecular architecture renders them an intriguing class of hosts capable of binding neutral, and ionic guests. The presence of dynamic covalent imine linkages connecting the dipyrrin segment with the ether chain enables unusual coordination behavior of crownphyrins, as demonstrated by the formation of two classes of strikingly different complexes. The remarkable metal‐mediated expansion to the helical [2+2] macrocyclic complex is reversible. The reaction of the figure‐eight mercury(II) assembly with [2.2.2]cryptand results in ring contraction providing the metal‐free crownphyrin macrocycle.

Keywords: Crown Ethers, Porphyrinoids, Receptors, Self-Assembly, Supramolecular Chemistry


Crownphyrins, hybrid systems forged from porphyrin and crown ether counterparts, were synthesized. The novel family of macrocycles serves as dynamic, conformationally flexible systems, able to undergo guest‐induced, reversible expansion. The tunable character of their cavities allows for binding neutral and ionic guests.

graphic file with name ANIE-61-0-g003.jpg

Introduction

The design of new macrocyclic compounds can be considered a core research area of modern supramolecular chemistry.[ 1 , 2 , 3 ] Porphyrins and crown ethers are two archetypical classes of macrocycles fundamental for the development of functional supramolecular materials.[ 4 , 5 ] Both groups of compounds demonstrated numerous intriguing features critical for their applications in coordination chemistry,[ 6 , 7 , 8 ] biomolecular mimetism,[ 9 , 10 , 11 ] self‐assembly,[ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] medicine,[ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] and materials sciences.[ 20 , 21 , 22 ] They acted as versatile macrocyclic platforms for artificial receptors,[ 23 , 24 , 25 ] optical sensors,[ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] catalysts,[ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] mechanically interlocked molecules,[ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] molecular machines,[ 39 , 40 , 41 ] cages,[ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] and stimuli‐responsive materials.[ 46 , 47 ]

In terms of molecular design, crown ethers and porphyrins belong to strikingly different classes of macrocyclic ligands. Porphyrins are planar, rigid, and aromatic macrocycles that incorporate nitrogen donors in the cavity predesigned to coordinate transition metals.[ 48 , 49 ] They typically act as four‐coordinate ligands enforcing the square planar, [50] tetragonal pyramidal, [51] or octahedral geometry [52] of metal centers, although other binding modes have also been described.[ 53 , 54 ] Crown ethers whose cavities incorporate oxygen donors, show flexibility, allowing them to adjust conformation to the requirements of the guest. [3] These structural features enable crown ethers to bind not only transition[ 32 , 55 ] but, most importantly, alkali and alkaline earth metals.[ 56 , 57 , 58 ] The cavity composed of hydrogen bond‐accepting oxygens rendered them ideal hosts for various organic compounds incorporating functional groups serving as hydrogen bond (HB) donors.[ 58 , 59 ]

Herein we report the hybrid macrocycles bearing structural features of porphyrins and crown ethers, namely crownphyrins (Figure 1). The compounds can be considered imine analogs of expanded porphyrinoids incorporating flexible oligo(ethylene glycol) moieties. Previously the Bowman‐James, Sessler, and Love groups have reported a variety of imine analogs of expanded porphyrins, including accordion porphyrins,[ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ] texaphyrins,[ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ] and Pacman calixpyrroles.[ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crownphyrin—a hybrid of porphyrin and crown ether.

Several crowned porphyrins were reported in which the crown ether ring was embedded as a meso‐substituent (1), [76] or attached to the β‐positions of a pyrrole ring (2) (Scheme 1). [77] Boitrel and others reported systems where the ether formed a strap placed on a single (3) or both sides of the macrocycle plane.[ 78 , 79 , 80 ] In fact, the first synthetic attempts toward the macrocyclic system merging the architectures of porphyrin and crown ether were undertaken by Sessler and co‐workers and published in the late‐1980s.[ 81 , 82 ] The group succeeded in synthesizing a tripyrrane‐incorporated macrocycle 4 and its derivative with a longer bridge, yet their properties and coordination chemistry remained untackled. In 2012 Love and co‐workers obtained iminocalixpyrroles, e.g., 5, forming Pacman‐type architectures upon metalation. [75] Ravikanth developed a copper(II)‐sensitive sensor 6 incorporating the structural elements of porphyrin and crown ether. [83]

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Crown ether‐embedded porphyrins and porphyrinoids.

In this contribution, we present a straightforward synthesis of crownphyrins and demonstrate that they act as remarkable macrocyclic ligands, forming two fundamentally different classes of complexes, depending on the requirements of the metal cation. The incorporation of lead(II) into the crownphyrin yielded a monomeric complex with the coordination environment of the metal composed of both—nitrogen and oxygen donors. Remarkably, the coordination of zinc(II), cadmium(II), and mercury(II), although initially leading to lead(II)‐analogous species, enforced the unexpected ring expansion, resulting in the figure‐eight architectures. Importantly, we have found that the same products can be directly targeted in three‐component reactions between diformyldipyrrins, amine, and a metal source, showcasing, to the best of our knowledge, the first use of diformyldipyrrins in the subcomponents self‐assembly. [84]

Results and Discussion

The synthesis of crownphyrins is straightforward and involves the condensation of a dicarboxyaldehyde introducing the dipyrrin motif with an ether chain‐embedded diamine (Scheme 2). Eventually, the diformyldipyrromethanes incorporating the meso‐phenyl‐7 a‐H3 and meso‐pentafluorophenyl‐ 7 b‐H3 substituents were found as suitable building blocks.[ 62 , 85 ]

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

The synthesis of crownphyrinogens and crownphyrins. 15 b‐H was obtained from 4,7,10‐trioxa‐1,13‐tridecanediamine 9.

The reactions of 7 a‐H3 and 7 b‐H3 with diamine 8 were carried out in DCM‐n‐hexane for 24 hours at 298 K. Depending on the meso‐substituent in the 7‐H3 substrate, crownphyrinogen 14 a‐H3 or crownphyrin 14 b‐H were nearly quantitatively obtained. However, even upon prolonged stirring of 14 a‐H3 under aerobic conditions, only up to 5–10 % of 14 a‐H was obtained. Reversely, the presence of pentaflurophenyl in 7 b‐H3 did not allow isolating pure 14 b‐H3 , as upon exposition to air, spontaneous oxidation to 14 b‐H was observed. The alternative pathway of 14 b‐H synthesis involved a direct condensation of 7 b‐H with 8 (Scheme 2). Following the synthetic protocol a series of crownphyrins 14 b‐H19 b‐H, differing in the oligo(ethylene glycol) chain length, was synthesized. All diamine reagents were either commercially available (8, 9) or could be easily obtained in reasonable quantities (1013). [86]

Interestingly, our results are different from Bowman‐James′ reports on the accordion‐porphyrins obtained in the template‐directed reactions between diformyldipyrromethane and propane‐1,3‐diamine. [60] In our case carrying out reactions in the presence of alkali and alkaline‐earth metal templates did not result in the preferable formation of [2+2] condensation products. Thus, the geometric dimensions of the diamine reagent seem to be the factor enforcing crownphyrinogens formation over dimerization.

The 1H NMR spectrum of 14 a‐H3 at 300 K demonstrated the features expected of the macrocycle composed of the meso‐aryl dipyrromethane connected to the ether chain through imine linkages (Figure 2A). The azomethine proton resonated at 7.98 ppm, whereas the β‐H gave rise to an AB spin system at 6.08 and 6.35 ppm. The sp 3 hybridization of the meso‐carbon was corroborated by the 13C NMR chemical shift of 44.10 ppm (Figure S30, Supporting Information) and the position of the CH singlet at 5.46 ppm. The signals corresponding to the crown ether segment demonstrated diastereotopic differentiation. Upon lowering the temperature to 205 K, the H2O line at 4.80 ppm appeared, altogether with the NH resonance at 10.63 ppm (Figure 2B, S25, Supporting Information). The chemical shift of the broad signal, down‐field relocated in comparison to the free water resonance in CDCl3 (ca. 1.56 ppm), suggested the placement of the water molecule in close proximity to the cavity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The 1H NMR spectra of A) 14 a‐H3 (300 K, CDCl3, 500 MHz), B) 14 a‐H3 (205 K, CDCl3, 600 MHz), C) 14 b‐H (300 K, CDCl3, 600 MHz). The impurities were marked with asterisks.

The absence of the meso‐CH signal in the 1H NMR spectrum ([D]chloroform, 300 K) of 14 b‐H confirmed the introduction of the dipyrrin motif into the macrocyclic framework (Figure 2C). The resonances attributed to imine and β‐pyrrolic protons were found at 8.44, 6.69, and 6.48 ppm. Interestingly, the 1H NMR spectrum of 15 b‐H recorded in [D2]DCM at 160 K showed that the tautomerization within the dipyrrin subunit was slowed down sufficiently to observe differentiation of the imine and β‐pyrrolic signals (Figure S63, Supporting Information). The broad resonance at 4.15 ppm, detected for 15 b‐H at 180 K, confirmed the crownphyrin is also amenable to binding water.

The XRD studies [87] unambiguously confirmed the identity of 14 a‐H3 and 15 b‐H. The molecular structure of 14 a‐H3 demonstrated the macrocycle built of the dipyrromethane segment connected with the ether chain through the imine linkages (Figure 3A). The Cα−Cmeso bond lengths equal to 1.501(3) Å, confirmed that both pyrroles are linked through C(sp 2)−C(sp 3) single bonds with the tetrahedral meso‐carbon. The C=N distances of 1.257(4) Å and 1.267(3) Å are in a range typical for imine bonds. [88] The single water molecule was found nesting within the cavity. 14 a‐H3  ⋅ H2O complex is stabilized through a network of hydrogen bonds with the water protons and pyrrole NH acting as HB donors, oxygen atoms of ether chain, and imine nitrogens being acceptors.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The X‐ray molecular structures of A) 14 a‐H3  ⋅ H2O, B) 15 a‐H7  ⋅ (HCl)2 , C) 15 b‐H. Left: front view, right: side projection with selected protons omitted for clarity.

Crownphyrinogens can be reduced in a reaction with excess sodium borohydride (Scheme S2, Supporting Information). The molecular structure of 14 a‐H7 revealed the macrocycle retaining the conformation of 14 a‐H3 and also binding the water molecule in the cavity (Figure S200, Supporting Information). Interestingly, the larger analog 15 a‐H7 crystallized as a dihydrochloride salt, as it interacts with chlorides so effectively that it bound them during the post‐reaction work‐up involving washing with the ammonium chloride solution (Figure 3B). The C−N bond lengths in the protonated secondary amine groups are equal to 1.500(10), 1.479(8), and 1.476(10), 1.489(11) Å. The pyrrole rings tilt in opposite directions at a 67° angle creating two pockets located above and below the mean macrocyclic plane, which supports the binding of chlorides on both sides.

The bond lengths pattern in the dipyrrin segment of 15 b‐H confirmed the valence structure presented in Scheme 2. The Cα−N−Cα bond angles equal 105.1(4)°and 110.5(4)° correspond to the imine, and amine pyrrolic nitrogens, respectively (Figure 3C). The length of the ether chain enforced its bending out of the diiminodipyrrin plane. The C=N distances are equal to 1.279(6) and 1.276(6) Å, expectedly of the imine C=N bond. One of the imine groups adopted a transoid geometry expelling the nitrogen atom outside the cavity.

Even the smallest representative of the crownphyrin series, i.e. 14 b‐H has a cavity large enough to classify it as an expanded porphyrinoid. [89] The modification of the ether chain length fundamentally alters the macrocycle‘s structural facets affecting the ligand‘s coordination properties (Figure 4A). Thus, 14 b‐H is a dual nature, single cavity ligand, in which the interaction with oxygen atoms supplements the coordination through the nitrogen donors. Further elongation of the ether chain enlarged the cavity dimensions, resulting in the macrocycles in which two separate binding pockets could arise. The first, porphyrin‐like is constructed of the dipyrrin moiety and two imine nitrogens preorganized for the coordination. The second one, composed solely of the oligo(ethylene glycol) units, mimics the crown ether pocket, as illustrated for 18 b‐H/19 b‐H.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A) The chain elongation strategy; B) the DFT optimized models of 14 b‐H19 b‐H and S1.

The presence of an crown ether segment in crownphyrins results in their conformational elasticity, more pronounced than for expanded porphyrinoids constructed of rigid heterocyclic or carbocyclic subunits.[ 90 , 91 ] In particular, the cavity of crownphyrin is expected to shrink, expand or bend upon metal binding or guest complexation. To estimate the cavity dimensions of 14 b‐H19 b‐H in their extended conformations, the DFT calculations (B3LYP/6‐31G(d,p)) were performed (Figure 4B). However, it needs to be pointed out that the pronounced flexibility of crownphyrins limits the precision of geometric dimensions estimation. As shown in Figure 4B the imine N⋅⋅⋅N distance (X) varies in a 4.4–5.0 Å range, whereas the vertical dimension (Y) ranges from 8.3 to >13.2 Å.

To explore the ligand properties of crownphyrins the reactions with metal cations differing in geometric preferences and coordination numbers were carried out for 14‐H and 15‐H as the representative examples (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Metal‐mediated reactivity of 15 b‐H.

The lead(II) having the covalent radius of 1.46 Å [92] was selected as the size‐wise adjusted to the cavity of 14‐H and 15‐H. In addition, the coordination sphere of PbII is adaptable, offering a wide range of coordination modes accessible for the crown‐ and heterocrown‐ethers, with the metal reaching high coordination numbers from eight to eleven.[ 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 ]

Stirring the dichloromethane solution of 15 b‐H with lead(II) acetate for 24 hours was associated with a distinct color change from orange to purple‐blue, indicative of the formation of 21 b‐Pb. Metalation of the macrocycle was reflected in the highly altered electronic spectrum of the product containing three absorption bands at 296, 551, and 585 nm (Figure S194, Supporting Information). Interestingly, the same complex type could be obtained directly from 14 a‐H3 . In fact, the spontaneous oxidation of dipyrromethane to dipyrrin upon metalation was reported. [97]

The 1H NMR spectrum ([D]chloroform, 300 K) of 21 b‐Pb contained two β‐pyrrolic signals at 6.57 and 6.72 ppm and the azomethine resonance at 8.60 ppm (Figure 5A). The broadening of the ether chain signals likely arises due to the dynamic nature of the complex, in which oxygen atoms of the ligand undergo reversible binding to the metal cation, [95] but the axial acetate↔water ligand exchange detected in the solution might also contribute. The 19F NMR spectrum of 21 b‐Pb recorded at 293 K revealed five resonances correspondingly to the differentiation of fluorine atoms in the C6F5‐group, being a consequence of the axial coordination of the acetate (Figure S115, Supporting Information). Both ortho‐F correlated to the same β 2,3 protons in the 1H‐19F HOESY spectrum (inset in Figure 5A, Figure S113, Supporting Information).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The 1H NMR spectra of A) 21 b‐Pb (300 K, CDCl3, 600 MHz), B) 21 b‐Cd (178 K, CD2Cl2, 500 MHz), C) 22 b‐Cd (300 K, CD2Cl2, 600 MHz), D) 22 b‐Cd (180 K, CD2Cl2, 600 MHz). The insets in traces A, B, and D contain part of the 1H‐19F HOESY spectra.

Eventually, lead(II) coordination was confirmed by single crystal XRD carried out for 20 a‐Pb (Figure 6A). [85] Two nearly identical molecules were found in the asymmetric unit, differing slightly in the arrangement of the ether chain. In both, the metal center lies in the diiminodipyrrin plane coordinating to pyrrolic and imine nitrogens. The Pb‐Npyrr distances remain in the 2.456(6)‐2.527(7) Å range, being notably shorter than Pb‐Nimine bonds which vary from 2.636(7) to 2.777(7) Å. The axially coordinated acetate ligands interact with the lead(II) through both oxygen atoms but one Pb−O bond is considerably longer, approaching 2.864(6)/2.899(6) Å, than the other equal to 2.308(6)/2.320(6) Å. The proximity of the metal and the ether chain oxygen atoms vary in a 3.072–3.328 Å range. Although smaller than the sum of van der Waals radii of lead and oxygen equal to 3.54 Å, [98] these values suggested only weak secondary interactions.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The X‐ray molecular structure of A) 20 a‐Pb and B) 22 b‐Zn. Left: front view, right: side projection. Protons were omitted for clarity.

To study the reactivity of crownphyrins towards metal cations with the preference for lower coordination numbers and geometrically more demanding than lead(II), the reactions of 15 b‐H were carried out with ZnII, CdII, and HgII salts (Scheme 3).

The zinc(II), cadmium(II), or mercury(II) acetate addition to a dichloromethane solution of 15 b‐H was typically carried out for 48 hours and was accompanied by a distinct change of color from orange to purple.

Unexpectedly, in the case of reaction with a ZnII source the mass spectrum recorded for the product mixture demonstrated, aside from the expected 21 b‐Zn product, the intense signal at the m/z=1163.3232 corresponding to a zinc(II) complex of the macrocycle with a doubled molecular mass compared to 21 b‐Zn (Figure S17,18, Supporting Information). The analogous spectra were recorded for the mixtures obtained from cadmium(II) and mercury(II) acetates (Figures S19–22, Supporting Information).

The monocrystals grown for 22‐M (M=Zn, Cd, Hg) provided the structural proof for the formation of novel metal‐organic assemblies (Figure 6B, S201–203, Supporting Information). [85] In all complexes, the penta‐ (22 a‐Zn, Figure S201, Supporting Information) or hexacoordinate (22 b‐M, M=Zn, Cd, Hg) metal cation was found to be bound to the macrocycle built of two diiminodipyrrin segments connected through ether chains. Each side of the macrocycle played a role of a tridentate ligand, coordinating the metal through two pyrrolic and single imine nitrogen, with the other, non‐involved in the coordination, acquiring a transoid geometry. The metal cation adopted a pseudo‐octahedral (pseudo‐square pyramidal for 22 a‐Zn, Figure S201, Supporting Information) geometry, arranging two iminodipyrrin ligands in a meridional fashion, and imposing the figure‐eight architecture. The M−Npyrr distances varied in ranges: 2.009(3)–2.180(3) Å for 22 b‐Zn, 2.222(7)–2.372(7) for 22 b‐Cd, and 2.160(7)–2.469(7) Å in 22 b‐Hg, whereas the M‐Nimine bonds were substantially longer, approaching 2.437(3)/2.469(3) Å, 2.491(7)/2.671(8) Å, and 2.671(8)/2.780(2) Å, respectively.

As could be inferred from the molecular structures of 22‐M, their formation required a metal‐enforced reassembly of 15 b‐H. To understand the mechanism of 22‐M formation the reactions of 15 b‐H with the ZnII, CdII, and HgII acetates were carried out under mass spectrometry and UV/Vis spectroscopy control (Figures S15–22, S197–199, Supporting Information).

The addition of cadmium(II) acetate aliquots to the solution of 15 b‐H was accompanied by a continuous color change from orange to purple‐blue, reflecting the alteration of the UV/Vis spectrum (Figure 7A). Upon the addition of one equivalent of cadmium(II) acetate, the bathochromic shift of the 15 b‐H band from 273 nm to 295 nm was observed, accompanied by the disappearance of the broad absorption at 485 nm and the rise of a more narrow one at the 585 nm (sh. 557 nm). The high‐resolution mass spectrum demonstrated a major signal at m/z=663.0913, corresponding to 21 b‐Cd (Figure 7C). Once formed, it started transforming yielding eventually the purple 22 b‐Cd. The transformation was associated with the 28 nm blue shift of the intense absorption to 557 nm (Figure 7B). The presence of signals at m/z=607.1525 (+2), and 1213.2975 (+1) in the mass spectrum confirmed the expansion to 22 b‐Cd (Figure 7D).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Left: the UV/Vis spectra (DCM, 278 K) A) recorded in the course of the titration of 15 b‐H with Cd(OAc)2 in MeOH; B) of 22 b‐Cd (298 K). Right: the high‐resolution mass spectra (experimental: top, simulated: bottom) of C) 21 b‐Cd; D) 22 b‐Cd.

21 b‐M (M=Zn, Cd, Hg) were obtained under the 1H NMR control at low temperature, which slowed down the following transformations (Figures S119, 130, Supporting Information). The 1H NMR spectrum of 21 b‐Cd in [D2]DCM at 178 K shared a considerable resemblance to 21 b‐Pb (Figure 5B). The cadmium(II) coordination was explicit, as confirmed by the 111/113Cd satellites for β‐ and azomethine protons signals at 6.55, 6.59, and 8.18 ppm, respectively. 21 b‐Zn and 21 b‐Hg complexes demonstrated resonances in similar regions (Figure S129, Supporting Information).

The 1H NMR spectrum of 22 b‐Cd at 300 K does not allow to distinguish it from 21 b‐Cd based on the symmetry (Figure 5C). The spectra of the corresponding 22 b‐Zn and 22 b‐Hg complexes are also similar to these of the respective 21 b‐M species, preventing structure determination solely on the number and chemical shifts of the resonances. In particular, the 1H NMR spectra of 22 b‐M did not reflect the symmetry of the molecule detected in the solid state (Figure 6B). Namely, two types of imine groups were identified in the crystal structure—one of which was uninvolved in the metal coordination. In contrast, only a single azomethine proton signal was identified in the 1H NMR spectra at 300 K. Thus, 22‐M was expected to adopt a different conformation in the solution or to be involved in a dynamic process, increasing its effective symmetry. Lowering the temperature of 22 b‐Cd in [D2]DCM resulted in a gradual broadening of resonances, followed by their doubling below 200 K (Figure S149, Supporting Information). At 180 K the spectrum corresponded to the solid‐state symmetry of 22 b‐Cd (Figure 5D). Four β‐pyrrolic lines were located in the 6.5–6.9 ppm range, alongside two azomethine signals at 8.15 and 8.01 ppm. The imine resonances revealed a critical difference; namely detection of the 111/113Cd satellites only for one of them was consistent with the presence of coordinating and non‐coordinating imine groups in the molecule. The pattern of the EXSY cross‐peaks detected in the ROESY spectrum (Figure S159–161, Supporting Information) for the protons of metal‐coordinated and non‐coordinating imine groups, as well as respective β‐H's, reflected the exchange indicative of the helicity inversion of 22 b‐M enantiomers (Scheme 4).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

The helicity inversion in 22‐M.

The difference between 21 b‐M and 22 b‐M became apparent upon a comparison of the 1H‐19F HOESY spectra (Figures 5B, D). In particular, for 21 b‐Cd, a single pair of the correlation peaks between two ortho‐F and β 2,3 protons was identified. In contrast, a set of cross‐peaks, including F⋅⋅⋅HC=N−Cd, F⋅⋅⋅HC=N, F⋅⋅⋅β 1‐4, and several F⋅⋅⋅CH2, was identified for 22 b‐Cd due to much closer distances between the meso‐C6F5 group and protons of the helical macrocycle. Thus, the HOESY experiment can be, in this case, exploited not only to probe the conformation of the assembly but also its size.

To our best knowledge, the metal‐mediated crownphyrin expansion consists of the unprecedented [1+1] to [2+2] transformation of the iminopyrrole macrocycle. In fact, the Schiff porphyrinoids expansion reactions are very rare. Love described the [2+2] to [3+3] enlargement of the calixpyrrole macrocycle upon zinc(II) coordination. [99]

Two mechanistic pathways resulting in the 21‐M to 22‐M expansion can be proposed (Figure 8). The first one involves the cleavage of a single imine bond of 21‐M, producing the open‐chain complex 23‐M. Its reaction with demetalated 24, enforced by maximizing the occupation of the cation‘s coordination sphere, would generate an open chain dimer 25‐M. The ring‐closing reaction of the latter could follow two routes, yielding the figure‐eight 22‐M or a catenand 27‐M. The shift of the equilibrium towards 22‐M likely resulted from the structural limitations of intermediates, namely the presence of a bulky meso‐aryl group, preventing 27‐M formation. The alternative pathway could involve the formation of a sandwich‐like complex 26‐M from the reaction of 21‐M and 15. Once formed, 26‐M could rearrange into 27‐M, or undergo partial or complete imine bonds cleavage to 25‐M, followed by ring‐closing reaction yielding 22‐M. [100]

Figure 8.

Figure 8

A plausible mechanism of 22‐M formation.

In fact, similar transformations, namely the formation of the helicate and catenand, were reported by Nitschke as alternative pathways governing the outcome of subcomponents self‐assembly of 2,2′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diylbis(oxy))bis(ethan‐1‐amine) and phenanthroline‐2,9‐dicarboxaldehyde in the presence of copper(I) template. [101] To verify if 22‐M can be obtained directly from the acyclic building blocks, we carried out a three‐component reaction between 7 b‐H, diamine 9, and zinc(II) acetate in a 2 : 2 : 1 ratio (Scheme 5). An alternative experiment was also carried out in which 7 b‐H was replaced by 7 b‐H3 . Both processes worked analogously, producing the helical 22 b‐Zn as the major product, although accompanied by minor species which could not be identified. It is worth pointing out that only one of the two assembly processes is fully reversible, as the formation of 22 b‐Zn required the oxidation of dipyrromethane to dipyrrin prior to the assembly, or at the macrocycle formation stage, limiting the reversibility.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

The formation of 22 b‐M via the subcomponents self‐assembly.

Surprisingly, we have found that in the case of 22 b‐Hg, the expansion of the macrocycle is reversible. The prolonged (ca. 7 days) stirring of the solution of 22 b‐Hg with [2.2.2]cryptand resulted in a mercury(II) removal and the transformation of the helical complex into 15 b‐H (Scheme 3; Figure S182, 183, Supporting Information), yet some unidentified byproducts were also formed. The same reaction carried out for 22 b‐Zn and 22 b‐Cd did not result in analogous contraction. The reassembly process can be understood in terms of the dynamic equilibrium involving 22 b‐Hg, 21 b‐Hg, 7 b‐H, diamine 9, and mercury(II). To our knowledge, only a single example of iminopyrrole macrocycle contraction was to date reported in the literature. [99]

Conclusion

The combination of structural facets of porphyrins and crown ethers resulted in the group of novel hybrid macrocycles, i.e. crownphyrins. They were demonstrated to be conformationally flexible and structurally adjustable systems, prone to binding neutral, cationic, and anionic guests. The ligand character of the crownphyrin is highly tunable; depending on the length of the ether chain, its cavity can be considered a dual nature, providing nitrogen and oxygen donors simultaneously but at a proper size, two discrete pockets, providing chemically diverse environments could form.

The presence of dynamic covalent imine bonds linking the dipyrrin segment with the ether chain remarkably affects the crownphyrin reactivity toward metal cations. Depending on the requirements of the metal, the macrocycle could form a monomeric complex with a secondary interaction between the cation and ligand oxygens or expand providing the octahedral arrangement of donors. Exceptionally, the same architecture could be obtained directly from pyrrole building blocks and diamine in the presence of a metal template, showcasing the exploitation of pyrrolic synthons in the subcomponents self‐assembly approach.

The described metal‐mediated transformations of crownphyrins are likely just the tip of the iceberg hiding the reactivity these ligands will reveal. The crownphyrins with two well‐defined cavities are preadapted for binding more than one cation providing exciting structural motifs, and opening new routes for the coordination chemistry of flexible porphyrinoids (Figure 9). Furthermore, the introduction of catalytically‐active metals into the crownphyrin core could allow for the construction of functional supramolecular systems capable of performing the controlled transformations on the bound guests.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Selected structural motifs attainable for complexes of large crownphyrins.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by the National Science Centre of Poland 2020/38/E/ST4/00024. DFT calculations were carried out using resources provided by the Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing, grant 329.

M. Matviyishyn, A. Białońska, B. Szyszko, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202211671; Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202211671.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.

References

  • 1. van Veggel F. C. J. M., Verboom W., Reinhoudt D. N., Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 279–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Martí-Centelles V., Pandey M. D., Burguete M. I., Luis S. V., Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 8736–8834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liu Z., Nalluri S. K. M., Stoddart J. F., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2459–2478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kolesnichenko I. V., Anslyn E. V., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2385–2390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Amabilino D. B., Smith D. K., Steed J. W., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2404–2420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Andrews C. G., Macdonald C. L. B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7453–7456; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 7619–7622. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dailey K. K., Rauchfuss T. B., Yap G. P. A., Rheingold A. L., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1833–1835; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1985–1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Horie M., Sassa T., Hashizume D., Suzaki Y., Osakada K., Wada T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4983–4986; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 5071–5074. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gokel G. W., Leevy W. M., Weber M. E., Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2723–2750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Taniguchi M., Lindsey J. S., Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 344–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dong Z., Luo Q., Liu J., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7890–7908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gao W.-X., Feng H.-J., Guo B.-B., Lu Y., Jin G.-X., Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6288–6325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Corbett P. T., Leclaire J., Vial L., West K. R., Wietor J.-L., Sanders J. K. M., Otto S., Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3652–3711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. He Z., Jiang W., Schalley C. A., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 779–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wang H., Wang K., Xu Y., Wang W., Chen S., Hart M., Wojtas L., Zhou L.-P., Gan L., Yan X., Li Y., Lee J., Ke X.-S., Wang X.-Q., Zhang C.-W., Zhou S., Zhai T., Yang H.-B., Wang M., He J., Sun Q.-F., Xu B., Jiao Y., Stang P. J., Sessler J. L., Li X., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 5826–5835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Xue X., Lindstrom A., Li Y., Bioconjugate Chem. 2019, 30, 1585–1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Liu C., Dobhal M. P., Ethirajan M., Missert J. R., Pandey R. K., Balasubramanian S., Sukumaran D. K., Zhang M., Kadish K. M., Ohkubo K., Fukuzumi S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14311–14323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Galan A., Andreu D., Echavarren A. M., Prados P., De Mendoza J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1511–1512. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Arambula J. F., Sessler J. L., Chem 2020, 6, 1634–1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Drain C. M., Varotto A., Radivojevic I., Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 1630–1658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Urbani M., Grätzel M., Nazeeruddin M. K., Torres T., Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 12330–12396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Banerjee D., Kim D., Schweiger M. J., Kruger A. A., Thallapally P. K., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2724–2739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Jones J. W., Gibson H. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7001–7004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Francesconi O., Ienco A., Moneti G., Nativi C., Roelens S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6693–6696; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6845–6848. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Norvaiša K., Flanagan K. J., Gibbons D., Senge M. O., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16553–16557; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 16705–16709. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mako T. L., Racicot J. M., Levine M., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 322–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ding Y., Zhu W.-H., Xie Y., Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 2203–2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Paolesse R., Nardis S., Monti D., Stefanelli M., Di Natale C., Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 2517–2583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Li J., Yim D., Jang W.-D., Yoon J., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2437–2458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Norvaiša K., Kielmann M., Senge M. O., ChemBioChem 2020, 21, 1793–1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li S., Huang J., Cook T. R., Pollock J. B., Kim H., Chi K.-W., Stang P. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2084–2087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yoo C., Dodge H. M., Miller A. J. M., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 5047–5059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Slagt V. F., Reek J. N. H., Kamer P. C. J., van Leeuwen P. W. N. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4271–4274; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 4401–4404. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Roucan M., Kielmann M., Connon S. J., Bernhard S. S. R., Senge M. O., Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 26–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Faiz J. A., Heitz V., Sauvage J.-P., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 422–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Niu Z., Gibson H. W., Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6024–6046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Forgan R. S., Sauvage J.-P., Stoddart J. F., Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5434–5464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Evans N. H., Beer P. D., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 4658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Basuray A. N., Jacquot de Rouville H.-P., Hartlieb K. J., Kikuchi T., Strutt N. L., Bruns C. J., Ambrogio M. W., Avestro A.-J., Schneebeli S. T., Fahrenbach A. C., Stoddart J. F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11872–11877; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 12042–12047. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu S., Kondratuk D. V., Rousseaux S. A. L., Gil-Ramírez G., O'Sullivan M. C., Cremers J., Claridge T. D. W., Anderson H. L., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5355–5359; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 5445–5449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Serreli V., Lee C.-F., Kay E. R., Leigh D. A., Nature 2007, 445, 523–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Durot S., Taesch J., Heitz V., Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8542–8578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Meng W., Breiner B., Rissanen K., Thoburn J. D., Clegg J. K., Nitschke J. R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3479–3483; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 3541–3545. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mouarrawis V., Bobylev E. O., Bruin B., Reek J. N. H., Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 8390–8397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Percástegui E. G., Mosquera J., Nitschke J. R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9136–9140; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 9264–9268. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xia D., Wang P., Ji X., Khashab N. M., Sessler J. L., Huang F., Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6070–6123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mandal A. K., Gangopadhyay M., Das A., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 663–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. O′Neill J. S., Kearney L., Brandon M. P., Pryce M. T., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 467, 214599. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Thuita D. W., Brückner C., Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 7990–8052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. To W.-P., Liu Y., Lau T.-C., Che C.-M., Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 5654–5664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Gutzeit F., Dommaschk M., Levin N., Buchholz A., Schaub E., Plass W., Näther C., Herges R., Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 12542–12546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Boucher L. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 6640–6645. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Le Gac S., Fusaro L., Roisnel T., Boitrel B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6698–6715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Arnold J., Dawson D. Y., Hoffman C. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2707–2713. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Swidan A., Macdonald C. L. B., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 3883–3915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bradshaw J. S., Izatt R. M., Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 338–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Hamilton G. R. C., Sahoo S. K., Kamila S., Singh N., Kaur N., Hyland B. W., Callan J. F., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4415–4432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Steed J. W., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 215, 171–221. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Luo Y.-H., Ge S.-W., Song W.-T., Sun B.-W., New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 723–729. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Acholla F., Mertes K. B., Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 3269–3270. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Acholla F. V., Takusagawa F., Mertes K. B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6902–6908. [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Gerasimchuk N. N., Gerges A., Clifford T., Danby A., Bowman-James K., Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 5633–5636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Reiter W. A., Gerges A., Lee S., Deffo T., Clifford T., Danby A., Bowman-James K., Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 174, 343–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Sessler J. L., Hemmi G., Mody T. D., Murai T., Burrell A., Young S. W., Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Brewster J. T., Thiabaud G. D., Harvey P., Zafar H., Reuther J. F., Dell'Acqua S., Johnson R. M., Root H. D., Metola P., Jasanoff A., Casella L., Sessler J. L., Chem 2020, 6, 703–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Hannah S., Lynch V., Guldi D. M., Gerasimchuk N., MacDonald C. L. B., Magda D., Sessler J. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8416–8427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Hannah S., Lynch V. M., Gerasimchuk N., Magda D., Sessler J. L., Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3911–3914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Mody T. D., Fu L., Sessler J. L., in Progress in Inorganic Chemistry (Ed.: Karlin K. D.), Wiley, Hoboken, 2007, pp. 551–598. [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Mody T. D., Sessler J. L., J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2001, 05, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Root H. D., Thiabaud G., Sessler J. L., Front. Chem. 2020, 14, 19–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Askarizadeh E., Yaghoob S. B., Boghaei D. M., Slawin A. M. Z., Love J. B., Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 710–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Love J. B., Chem. Commun. 2009, 3154–3165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Arnold P. L., Jones G. M., Odoh S. O., Schreckenbach G., Magnani N., Love J. B., Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 221–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Arnold P. L., Pécharman A.-F., Hollis E., Yahia A., Maron L., Parsons S., Love J. B., Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 1056–1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Leeland J. W., Finn C., Escuyer B., Kawaguchi H., Nichol G. S., Slawin A. M. Z., Love J. B., Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 13815–13831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Thanabal V., Krishnan V., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3643–3650. [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Murashima T., Uchihara Y., Wakamori N., Uno H., Ogawa T., Ono N., Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3133–3136. [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Richardson N. M., Sutherland I. O., Camilleri P., Page J. A., Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3739–3742. [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Michaudet L., Richard P., Boitrel B., Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8289–8292. [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Gunter M. J., Johnston M. R., Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 4801–4804. [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Sessler J. L., Burrell A. K., in Macrocycles, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992, pp. 177–273. [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Sessler J. L., Johnson M. R., Lynch V., Murai T., J. Coord. Chem. 1988, 18, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Ojha B., Kumar A., Thorat K. G., Ravikanth M., Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 130574. [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Sarma R. J., Nitschke J. R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 377–380; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 383–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Taniguchi M., Balakumar A., Fan D., McDowell B. E., Lindsey J. S., J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2005, 09, 554–574. [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Mongin C., Ardoy A. M., Méreau R., Bassani D. M., Bibal B., Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 1478–1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Crystal data for 14 a-H3 , 14 a-H7 , 15 a-H7 , 15 b-H, 20 a-Pb, 22 a-Zn, 22 b-Zn, 22 b-Cd, and 22 b-Hg are given in the Supporting Information. Deposition Numbers 2192561, 2192562, 2192563, 2192564, 2192565, 2192566, 2192567, 2192568 and 2192569 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.
  • 88. Orpen A. G., Brammer L., Allen F. H., Kennard O., Watson D. G., Taylor R., in Structure Correlation, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 752–858. [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Sessler J. L., Seidel D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5134–5175; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 5292–5333. [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Szyszko B., Białek M. J., Pacholska-Dudziak E., Latos-Grażyński L., Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 2839–2909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Szyszko B., Latos-Grażyński L., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16874–16901; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 17020–17049. [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Cordero B., Gómez V., Platero-Prats A. E., Revés M., Echeverría J., Cremades E., Barragán F., Alvarez S., Dalton Trans. 2008, 2832–2838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Rieger F., Mudring A.-V., Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 2989–2993. [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Rogers R. D., Bond A. H., J. Chem. Crystallogr. 1997, 27, 263–267. [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Farina P., Latter T., Levason W., Reid G., Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 4714–4724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Rogers R. D., Bond A. H., Inorg. Chim. Acta 1992, 192, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Brückner C., Karunaratne V., Rettig S. J., Dolphin D., Can. J. Chem. 1996, 74, 2182–2193. [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sergio Casas J., Sordo J., Vidarte M. J., in Lead, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 41–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Givaja G., Blake A. J., Wilson C., Schröder M., Love J. B., Chem. Commun. 2005, 4423–4425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Ciaccia M., Di Stefano S., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 646–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Hutin M., Schalley C. A., Bernardinelli G., Nitschke J. R., Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4069–4076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES