Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Mar 22;35(7):2752–2761. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02939

Partitioning the Two-Leg Spin Ladder in Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6: From Magnetic Order through Spin-Freezing to Paramagnetism

Charlotte Pughe , Otto H J Mustonen ‡,†,*, Alexandra S Gibbs §,∥,⊥,*, Stephen Lee #, Rhea Stewart #, Ben Gade §, Chennan Wang , Hubertus Luetkens , Anna Foster , Fiona C Coomer , Hidenori Takagi ⊥,¶,&, Edmund J Cussen †,*
PMCID: PMC10100530  PMID: 37063596

Abstract

graphic file with name cm2c02939_0011.jpg

Ba2CuTeO6 has attracted significant attention as it contains a two-leg spin ladder of Cu2+ cations that lies in close proximity to a quantum critical point. Recently, Ba2CuTeO6 has been shown to accommodate chemical substitutions, which can significantly tune its magnetic behavior. Here, we investigate the effects of substitution for non-magnetic Zn2+ impurities at the Cu2+ site, partitioning the spin ladders. Results from bulk thermodynamic and local muon magnetic characterization on the Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6 solid solution (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.6) indicate that Zn2+ partitions the Cu2+ spin ladders into clusters and can be considered using the percolation theory. As the average cluster size decreases with increasing Zn2+ substitution, there is an evolving transition from long-range order to spin-freezing as the critical cluster size is reached between x = 0.1 to x = 0.2, beyond which the behavior became paramagnetic. This demonstrates well-controlled tuning of the magnetic disorder, which is highly topical across a range of low-dimensional Cu2+-based materials. However, in many of these cases, the chemical disorder is also relatively strong in contrast to Ba2CuTeO6 and its derivatives. Therefore, Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6 provides an ideal model system for isolating the effect of defects and segmentation in low-dimensional quantum magnets.

1. Introduction

Copper oxides are excellent hosts for unusual magnetic phenomena. This is due to the quantum spin S = 1/2 of Cu2+ cations combined with the strong Jahn–Teller effect, which leads to co-operative orbital ordering that effectively lowers the dimensionality of the interactions between the Cu2+ spins. The quantum spin and low dimensionality enhances quantum effects and can give rise to a range of exotic quantum magnetic phases and transitions, many of which are of technological value.1 As a result, copper-based transition metal oxides such as perovskites are desirable models to study existing and discover new low-dimensional quantum phenomena, e.g., high temperature superconductivity, frustrated magnetism, and quantum magnetic transitions.28

The two-leg spin ladder in Ba2CuTeO6 is an example of a low-dimensional copper perovskite. The 12R hexagonal perovskite structure of Ba2CuTeO6 has face-sharing CuO6-TeO6-CuO6 trimers linked by corner-sharing TeO6 units (Figure 1a).9 Through Cu-O-Te-O-Cu superexchange, this creates two-leg Cu2+ spin ladders along the b axis of the monoclinic crystal structure, wherein the intra-ladder superexchange interactions are the Jleg and Jrung interactions shown by the red arrows in Figure 1b. A weak inter-ladder exchange (Jinter) occurs through the face-sharing trimers, creating a highly quasi-two-dimensional system.10 This system has attracted interest as it lies very close to the quantum critical point (QCP) on the Nèel ordered side of the two-leg spin ladder phase diagram shown in Figure 1c.1113 QCPs are electronic phase transitions at absolute zero, and they occur in a range of technologically important materials (e.g., superconductors, insulators, and semiconductors).1417

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Monoclinic structure of Ba2CuTeO6 showing the 12R hexagonal stacking sequence. The intra-ladder (Jleg and Jrung) interactions between the Cu2+ cations (colored green) are indicated by the red arrows. The inter-ladder interaction Jinter through the face-sharing CuO6-TeO6-CuO6 trimer is indicated by the blue arrow. (b) Two-leg spin ladder structure of Cu2+ cations in Ba2CuTeO6 viewed along the a axis. (c) Two-leg spin ladder phase diagram. The red arrow shows that Ba2CuTeO6 lies close to the quantum critical point (QCP) on the Nèel ordered side of the phase diagram.

We have recently demonstrated that the intra-ladder interactions in Ba2CuTeO6 can be site-selectively tuned through W6+ substitution.18 W6+ is almost exclusively substituted for Te6+ at the corner-sharing site (B″(c)) rather than the face-sharing trimer site (B″(f)) indicated in Figure 1. Through the d10/d0 effect, the competing d10 Te6+ and d0 W6+ interactions strongly suppress the Jrung, while the Jleg is slightly strengthened.18,19 This tunes the system from a spin ladder toward a spin chain, further reducing the dimensionality of the Cu2+ interactions. It is possible that the dimensionality of the two-leg spin ladder could be modified from another perspective. Instead of between ladders, substitution could be performed directly within the ladder at the Cu2+ site. Non-magnetic impurities, whether intrinsic or purposefully introduced, are an important consideration when synthesizing magnetic materials and have been considered using percolation theory in square lattices, spin chains, and spin ladders.20,21 In a two-leg spin ladder, any finite impurities will segment the ladder into clusters. This is due to the fact that a ladder is a one-dimensional system, and two neighboring non-magnetic impurities linked by a “rung” will create a break in the ladder interactions. The size of the clusters is controlled by the level of non-magnetic impurities.21

Non-magnetic Zn2+ impurities have been studied in two-leg spin ladders previously. Examples include Sr(Cu1 – xZnx)2O3, Bi(Cu1 – xZnx)2PO6, and (C7H10N)2Cu1 – xZnx(Br)4.2229 These two-leg spin ladders lie on the spin singlet side of the two-leg spin ladder phase diagram, where Jinter is weak, creating near-isolated spin ladders. As expected, the introduction of Zn2+ creates “free” Cu2+ spins as singlet dimers are broken by the removal of Cu2+.23 Unexpectedly, antiferromagnetic ordering has also been observed for Sr(Cu1 – xZnx)2O3 and Bi(Cu1 – xZnx)2PO6 with low Zn2+ concentrations (x = 0.01–0.02).24,25,29 It is proposed that antiferromagnetic order arises from Cu2+ moments generated in the vicinity of the Zn2+ impurity.28 The Cu2+ moments are independent of geometry and create antiferromagnetic correlations.29 Theoretical calculations suggest that the extended Cu2+ spin ladder interactions are not destroyed and only the local Cu2+ singlets are affected.30 The effect of Zn2+ impurities in Nèel ordered two-leg spin ladders with stronger Jinter interactions remains experimentally unexplored. To investigate, a solid solution of Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.6) was prepared and analyzed using a range of structural and magnetic characterization techniques.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Synthesis

Polycrystalline powders of Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6, 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.6, were prepared by mixing high-purity BaCO3 (99.997%), CuO (99.9995%), ZnO (99.99%), and TeO2 (99.995%). The reactant mixture was pressed into a pellet and calcined in air for 12 h at 900 °C. Calcined pellets were re-ground and pressed before heating at 1050–1100 °C under a flow of oxygen for 24 h. A total of 72 h (3 × 24 h) was required to achieve phase purity in all samples.

2.2. X-ray and Neutron Diffraction

A Rigaku Miniflex diffractometer (Cu Kα1/ Kα2 (λ = 1.5405 and 1.5443 Å)) monitored the sample purity during the reaction. Neutron diffraction data were collected on the time-of-flight diffractometer HRPD at the ISIS Neutron and Muon Source.31,32 The data were collected at ambient temperature in a standard time-of-flight window of 30–130 ms with the sample contained in standard cylindrical vanadium cans. Data were analyzed using Rietveld refinement as implemented in GSAS, TOPAS Academic v7, and PIEFACE for polyhedral distortions.3335

2.3. Inductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectroscopy

ICP-OES was performed on x = 0.1–0.6 samples to determine the relative percentage of Cu2+ and Zn2+ in the samples. Powder samples were digested in an aqua regia mixture at 150 °C before being analyzed by a Spectrogreen FMX46 ICP-OES where, upon ionization, the percentage Cu2+ and Zn2+ in each sample was determined from the light emitted at wavelengths of 324.754 nm (Cu) and 213.856 nm (Zn) using an optical spectrometer.

2.4. Magnetic Susceptibility

Measurements were performed using a Quantum Design MPMS3 SQUID magnetometer. The DC susceptibility (χ vs T) was measured between 2 and 300 K in both zero-field cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) modes using a 1000 Oe external field. AC susceptibility (χAC vs T) measurements were performed on the x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 samples. Using a weak DC field of 25 Oe and an AC field of 5 Oe, the AC susceptibility was measured from 2 to 100 K in a frequency range of 10 to 467 Hz.

2.5. Heat Capacity

A Quantum design PPMS was used to perform heat capacity measurements. Shards of sintered pellets weighing ∼10 mg were placed onto the sample puck using Apiezon N grease, and the heat capacity was measured using the thermal relaxation method between 2 and 100 K in the zero field. The contribution of the grease and puck was subtracted from the total measurement to give the heat capacity of the sample.

2.6. Muon Spin Relaxation

Muon experiments were performed at the Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) using the GPS beamline. Approximately 1 g of polycrystalline powder (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) was loaded into a silver foil packet and secured onto the sample fork. The sample fork was inserted into the muon beam and cooled to 1.5 K using a cryostat. Zero-field (ZF), transverse-field (TF), and longitudinal-field (LF) muon spin relaxation measurements were performed between 1.5 and 20 K. The data were analyzed using musrfit.36

3. Results

3.1. Crystal Structure

Our high resolution neutron diffraction data confirm that the same monoclinic C2/m crystal structure is present across the series 0 ≤x ≤ 0.6 at T = 300 K. Figure 2 shows an example of the Rietveld refinement for x = 0.1, wherein all the Bragg peaks are described well by the refined C2/m model shown in Table S1. It should be noted that the parent x = 0 compound has a weak transition to a triclinic P1̅ phase at T = 287 K, and the x = 1 composition is rhombohedral (Rm).9,10C2/m to P1̅ distortions could be observed for Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6 upon cooling. This distortion will have a minor effect on the structure and interactions as the C2/m and P1̅ models are very similar. Consequently, the high-temperature C2/m structure can be used to model the magnetic interactions in the low-temperature P1̅ structure of Ba2CuTeO6.12

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Rietveld refinement of the monoclinic x = 0.1 model using the 300 K HRPD neutron diffraction data for Ba2Cu0.9Zn0.1TeO6 (Rwp(%) = 6.41 and χ2 = 2.924).

Substitution of Zn2+ for Cu2+ leads to a systematic reduction in the a lattice parameter, an increase in b and c, and an increase in the monoclinic β angle. This results from a weakening of the strength of the cooperative Jahn–Teller distortion with increasing x. Due to the significant irregularity in the shape and bond lengths of the (Cu,Zn)O6 octahedra, this may be better quantified through minimum bounding ellipsoid analysis34 than by the investigation of specific bond lengths and angles. The main parameter of interest from this calculation is the magnitude of the largest ellipsoidal principal axis (effectively the Jahn–Teller axis), R1. As x varies from 0 to 0.2 to 0.4, for example, the magnitude of this parameter decreases from 2.371 Å to 2.356 and 2.343 Å. In addition, the variance of the principal axes indicates the overall strength of the distortion from an ideal polyhedron. As expected, this reduces monotonically with increasing x with σ(R)x = 0 = 0.192, σ(R)x = 0.2 = 0.179, and σ(R)x = 0.4 = 0.167.

Given the similar Cu2+ and Zn2+ X-ray and neutron scattering lengths, ICP-OES was used to confirm the samples’ stoichiometries. The ICP-OES results gave the percentages of Cu2+ and Zn2+ in each composition. The percentage of Zn2+ was divided by the total percentages of Cu2+ and Zn2+ in each sample. This gave the proportion of Zn2+ in the sample as a decimal where the total amount of Cu2+ + Zn2+ = 1, and the Cu2+ portion was found by Cu2+ = 1- Zn2+. Table 1 shows that the Zn2+ portion incrementally increases by ∼0.1 for each x = 0.1 increase in the Zn2+ concentration, while the Cu2+ portion decreases by ∼0.1. This agrees with the sample stoichiometry of the x = 0.1–0.6 samples, confirming no elemental losses.

Table 1. Results from ICP-OES Measurements of the Ba2CuxZn1 – xTeO6x = 0.1–0.6 Samples Showing the Amount of Zn2+ and Cu2+ in Each Sample as a Proportion of the Total Amount of Cu2+ and Zn2+, Where Cu2+ + Zn2+ = 1.

x Zn2+ Cu2+
0.1 0.1068(3) 0.893(3)
0.2 0.2116(6) 0.788(2)
0.3 0.312(3) 0.688(6)
0.4 0.417(4) 0.583(6)
0.5 0.516(3) 0.484(2)
0.6 0.621(2) 0.388(1)

3.2. DC Susceptibility

Figure 3 shows the χ vs T data for x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.6. No ZFC and FC divergence was observed for any of the samples. There are clear changes in the features of the χ vs T curve as Zn2+ is introduced to Ba2CuTeO6. To most clearly show the effect of dilution of Cu2+ by Zn2+, the susceptibility has been scaled to cm3 mol–1 of Cu2+. Panel (a) shows the χ vs T curve of x = 0 has a broad maximum of about Tmax ≈ 74 K, below which the susceptibility decreases leading to a low-temperature upturn of about Tmin ≈ 14 K. Tmax represents the establishment of short-range ladder interactions. The low temperature upturn is thought to indicate entry to the Nèel ordered state but is not a classical indication of antiferromagnetic order.10,18 Therefore, the upturn cannot be assumed to be the position of TN. Instead, magnetic ordering has been confirmed using other methods and places TN at 14.1 K for Ba2CuTeO6.5

Figure 3.

Figure 3

DC susceptibility data of the (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.1, (c) x = 0.2, (d) x = 0.3, (e) x = 0.5, and (f) x = 0.6 Ba2CuxZn1 – xTeO6 samples. χ is scaled to cm3 mol–1 of Cu2+ to reflect dilution of the Cu2+ site. The χ vs T data of x = 0.4 was identical to other samples beyond x ≥ 0.3. The position of Tmax and/or Tmin are indicated in the χ vs T curves where appropriate. Expansions of the low-temperature data are shown in panels (b) and (c). There is a clear “kink” at ∼10 K in the x = 0.1 curve that is not visible in the x ≥ 0.2 curves. (g) Weiss constant (θW) plotted as a function of x in Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6. θW increases linearly as x increases, showing large weakening of the magnetic interactions.

The introduction of 10% Zn2+ (Figure 3b) causes a sharp rise in the low-temperature upturn feature and a shift in Tmax toward lower temperatures. The decrease in Tmax (Table 2) indicates weakening of the short-range interactions. The expansion in panel (b) shows a visible “kink” in the low-temperature data at 10 K, close to the position of the Tmin upturn in x = 0. Beyond x = 0.1, there is no visible “kink” in the low-temperature data (see expansion in Figure 3c). The low-temperature susceptibility continues to grow, and the Tmax feature transitions into a large paramagnetic tail. The inverse 1/χ vs T data between 150 and 300 K were fitted using the Curie–Weiss law (see Supplementary Figure S15). Table 2 shows the values of the Curie constant (C), Weiss constant (θW), and effective magnetic moment (μeff). The linear change in θW (plotted in Figure 3g) from −89.3(4) K for x = 0 to a value of −9.9(5) K for x = 0.6 shows a large weakening of the antiferromagnetic interactions. Table 2 shows that the μeff is close to the previously reported value for Ba2CuTeO6 and Ba2CuTe1 – xWxO6.10,18

Table 2. Results from DC χ vs T Data for Ba2CuxZn1 – xTeO6 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.6).

x Tmax (K) C (cm3 K mol–1) θW (K) μeffB per Cu2+)
0 73.7 0.4450(7) –89.3(4) 1.890(5)
0.1 64 0.4688(8) –84.0(3) 1.936(2)
0.2 ∼57 0.4438(4) –71.70(9) 1.8840(8)
0.3   0.4365(7) –58.6(2) 1.869(1)
0.4   0.4291(7) –44.3(2) 1.852(1)
0.5   0.4214(6) –36.6(2) 1.835(1)
0.6   0.3751(8) –9.9(3) 1.732(2)

The χ vs T data for 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.3 were modeled using the isolated two-leg spin ladder model between 35 and 300 K. The model is based on Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations of isolated two-leg spin ladders and has been employed to model Ba2CuTeO6 and Ba2CuTe1 – xWxO6 previously.10,18,22 The fitting parameters, Jleg, Jrung/Jleg, and Landè g-factor, for x = 0 were near identical to previous reports: Jleg = 89.2(3) K, Jrung/Jleg = 0.972(6), and g = 2.231(2).10,18 The x = 0.1 data could be described using the spin ladder model but, as shown in Figure 4, began to fail for x = 0.2 as the Tmax feature is suppressed. The model completely fails for x = 0.3, indicating a change from spin ladder behavior. This can be seen by comparing the fits shown by the solid black lines in Figure 4. Hence, accurate fitting parameters could only be obtained for x = 0.1 and suggest slight strengthening of the Jleg = 99.5(2) K interaction compared to x = 0. The Jrung/Jleg = 0.17(2) ratio is significantly reduced from near unity in the x = 0 compound, showing strong suppression of the Jrung interaction. This agrees with the values of θW and μeff, which suggest weakening of the overall intra-ladder interactions in x = 0.1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Modeling the χ vs T data of x = 0, 0.1, and 0.2 using the QMC isolated two-leg spin ladder model. The fits are shown by the solid black lines. The data are offset along the y axis. The isolated two-leg spin ladder model provides a good description of the x = 0 and x = 0.1 data, allowing extraction of the Jleg, Jrung/Jleg, and g fitting parameters. The fit to the x = 0.2 and x = 0.3 data shows that the model increasingly fails to described the suppressing Tmax feature.

3.3. AC Susceptibility

The AC susceptibility data is shown in Figure 5. The χAC vs T curves in panels (a) x = 0.1, (b) x = 0.2, and (c) x = 0.3 show no frequency-dependent shift. Neither were there any distinctive peaks in the imaginary component of the AC susceptibility (χAC vs T) plotted in Supplementary Figure S16. As such, the expected AC signatures of a canonical spin glass are not observed in any of the samples.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

AC susceptibility data of the (a) x = 0.1, (b) x = 0.2, and (c) x = 0.3 samples. None of the samples show any frequency-dependent shift in their χAC vs T curve to suggest a canonical spin glass.

3.4. Muon Spin Relaxation

Muon spin relaxation (μSR) experiments were performed on x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 to learn more about the local magnetic behavior. Previous measurements of Ba2CuTeO6 on ARGUS at the RIKEN-RAL using a pulsed muon source have identified a single oscillation of frequency f = 4.3 MHz in the ZF-μSR data at 2 K.5 Continuous muon sources such as PSI offer improved time resolution and can detect higher frequency oscillations compared to at pulsed sources. In this work, x = 0 was measured on GPS using a continuous PSI source, and the 1.5 K ZF-μSR data in Figure 6a shows that the signal is actually composed of two oscillations. The presence of two oscillations shows there are two muon stopping sites in Ba2CuTeO6. The two oscillations were described well using the polarization function in eq 1. This sums a Gaussian cosine and an exponential cosine (to describe the two oscillations) with an exponential background term.

3.4. 1

Figure 6.

Figure 6

GPS ZF-μSR data of the (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.1, (c) x = 0.2, and (d) x = 0.3 samples at 1.5 K. The black lines in the plots are the fits to the experimental data. Clear oscillations are observed for the x = 0 and x = 0.1 samples, demonstrating long-range order. Recovery of 1/3 of the initial asymmetry implies static ordering for x = 0.2, whereas exponential relaxation observed for x = 0.3 reflects a mostly dynamic magnetic environment. The goodness of fit (χ2) is shown in each panel.

A0, A1, and A2 are the initial asymmetries, σ is the Gaussian decay rate, λ1 is the exponential cosine decay rate, and λ2 is the decay rate of the background term. f1 and f2 are the frequencies, and ø1 and ø2 are the phases of the respective oscillations. From the fit in Figure 6a, f1 = 3.81(1) MHz, f2 = 6.67(9) MHz, and the phases were zero in zero-field. The values of σ = 1.4(1) μs–1 and λ1 = 12.3(8) μs–1 show that muon relaxation is faster at the muon site described by the exponential cosine term.

Figure 6 compares the ZF-μSR data of x = 0 in panel (a) to the Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6 (b) x = 0.1, (c) x = 0.2, and (d) x = 0.3 data at 1.5 K. Clear oscillations are present in the x = 0.1 data in panel (b), showing that long-range magnetic order is still present. The oscillations were described poorly using the x = 0 polarization function in eq 1 (see Supplementary Figure S17). Instead, the x = 0.1 muon relaxation was better described using the polarization function involving Bessel functions in eq 2.

3.4. 2

Here, two exponential zeroth-order Bessel functions J0(2πf1t + ø1) describe the two muon sites, and the exponential term describes the background. The fit in panel (b) of Figure 6 shows that eq 2 describes the muon relaxation of x = 0.1 well when the phases of the Bessel functions were non-zero (ø1= 33.9(4.2)° and ø2= −35.9(4.4)°). The use of Bessel functions implies an incommensurate magnetic structure where the non-zero phase arises from the infinite number of magnetically inequivalent muon sites.3739 However, this behavior has also been observed in materials with significant disorder whose magnetic structures are commensurate.8,40,41 The x = 0 ZF-μSR data in Figure 6a was also fitted using eq 2 and is compared to the fit using eq 1 in Supplementary Figure S18. Both equations provided an adequate description of the muon polarization. The slight improvement in the fit using eq 2 implies that an incommensurate magnetic structure could also be plausible for x = 0. The ZF-μSR data for x = 0.1 at above 1.5 K in Figure S19 shows that the magnetic oscillations decay on warming and are no longer visible above 8 K. This indicates that 10% Zn2+ substitution lowered the transition temperature compared to x = 0 (TN= 14.1 K).

Panel (c) in Figure 6 shows the behavior of the x = 0.2 sample differs to x = 0.1. There are no oscillations to suggest long-range order. The muon polarization drops sharply at low times but quickly retains 1/3 of the initial asymmetry. Retention of 1/3 of the initial asymmetry suggests a static component to the muon relaxation as well as a dynamic component that leads to the sharp drop in the initial asymmetry. The combination of static and dynamic behavior can be phenomenologically described using the sum of a Gaussian dynamic Kubo–Toyabe function and an exponential as in eq 3, where pz(t) is the static Kubo–Toyabe function (eq 4), v is the muon hopping rate, δ is the width of the local field distribution, and λ the exponential decay rate.

3.4. 3
3.4. 4

At 1.5 K, v is close to zero; therefore, the static Kubo–Toyabe function mainly contributes to P(t). This accounts for the 1/3 retention of the initial asymmetry. This shows that the spins are frozen at 1.5 K. ZF-μSR measurements at higher temperatures show that the muon hopping rate increases on warming (see Supplementary Figure S20), causing gradual loss of the 1/3 tail as the frozen static moments become dynamic. Note that the x = 0.2 muon relaxation also resembles a spin glass. However, fits using stretch exponentials did not derive a meaningful stretching exponent (i.e., β < 0.5) to support canonical spin glass behavior in agreement with the AC susceptibility data.

The 1.5 K ZF-μSR of x = 0.3 in panel (c) is exponential with no recovery of 1/3 of the asymmetry. The muon relaxation was described using two exponentials to reflect the two muon sites:

3.4. 5

ZF-μSR measurements on warming show that the high-temperature muon relaxation is quickly recovered as the dynamic fluctuations increase with temperature (see Supplementary Figure S21). Transverse field (TF)-μSR measurements were also performed on warming. Dampening of the TF-μSR oscillations indicates static magnetism as the muon spins begin to feel the effects of the internal fields and decouple from the TF field. While the majority of the Cu2+ moments in x = 0.3 are dynamic, slight dampening of the TF-μSR oscillations upon cooling in Figure 7c implies a small fraction of frozen spins. The TF-μSR asymmetry AT(T) was determined by fitting the TF oscillations using eq 6. The normalized AT(T)/AT(20 K) for x = 0.3 plotted in red in Figure 7d noticeably decreases below 10 K and suggests that ∼14% of the spins are frozen at 1.5 K.

3.4. 6

Figure 7.

Figure 7

TF-μSR data for the (a) x = 0.1, (b) x = 0.2, and (c) x = 0.3 samples. TF-μSR data were collected at various temperatures between 1.5 and 20 K using a TF field of 30 G. Clear dampening is observed for the x = 0.1 and x = 0.2 samples, whereas the TF oscillations for x = 0.3 are only slightly damped at 1.5 K. Panel (d) plots the normalized TF asymmetry AT(T)/AT(20 K) for x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 as a function of temperature, T. AT(T)/AT(20 K) was determined by fitting the TF oscillations using eq 6.

Figure 7 also shows the TF-μSR data of (a) x = 0.1 and (b) x = 0.2. Figure 7a shows complete dampening of the TF oscillations for x = 0.1. The AT(T)/AT(20 K) plot for x = 0.1 (green) in Figure 7d shows that long-range ordering is complete below 8 K, showing that Zn2+ lowered the ordering temperature of Ba2CuTeO6 (TN = 14.1 K). The transition was gradual and occurred over a wider temperature range than might be expected for long-range ordering. The transition temperature was chosen as the point at which AT(T)/AT(20 K) plateaued to a constant value. Strong dampening was observed for x = 0.2 (Figure 7b). The value of AT(T)/AT(20 K) in Figure 7d plateaued to a constant value, indicating that freezing of the magnetic spins was complete below 4 K for x = 0.2 (shown in pink). It was noted that the TF oscillations were not completely damped at 1.5 K for x = 0.2 in Figure 7b, whereas they were in the x = 0.1 data in Figure 7a. This supports the existence of a small dynamic fraction (∼6%) at 1.5 K. It is also noted that the transitions in the x = 0.1 and x = 0.2 samples are also gradual. This is clearly shown in the plot in Figure 7d comparing the AT(T)/AT(20 K) data of x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3.

Longitudinal field (LF)-μSR measurements of x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are compared in Figure 8. LF-μSR measurements indicate the field strength required to repolarize the muon spin in the direction of the LF field. Figure 8 shows the LF data of (a) x = 0.1 and (b) x = 0.2. For x = 0.1, suppression of the muon relaxation occurs above 100 G and complete repolarization occurs by 1000 G. The small suppression observed between 0 and 50 G represents decoupling from weak static nuclear spins. Larger LF fields are required to decouple electronic spins compared to nuclear spins. Repolarization requires weaker LF fields than might be expected for a long-range ordered sample owing to the weak Cu2+ moment and quantum fluctuations. The effects of the LF field can be seen at 100 G in the x = 0.2 dataset in Figure 8b. The stronger suppression between 50 and 100 G might represent decoupling from dynamic or static electronic spins as well as static nuclear spins. Similar to the x = 0.1 data, the largest changes occur above 100 G and the muon polarization is nearly completely recovered at 1000 G. The LF-μSR data for x = 0.3 in Figure 8c behaves differently. The muon polarization is gradually recovered as the LF field increases and is nearly complete at 1000 G. Suppression at 50 G likely represents decoupling from static nuclear spins, while the gradual recovery above 50 G resembles decoupling from dynamic electronic spins.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

LF-μSR measurements of the (a) x = 0.1, (b) x = 0.2, and (c) x = 0.3 samples. LF measurements were performed at 1.5 K using LF fields of 50–1000 G.

3.5. Heat Capacity

The zero-field heat capacity (CP/T vs T) data of the x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 samples is plotted in Figure 9a. As in previous reports, no clear Nèel transition can be observed for Ba2CuTeO6 at ∼14 K.10,18 The close proximity to the QCP creates quantum fluctuations that smear out the lambda (λ) ordering peak. The CP/T vs T curve of x = 0.1 is similar, with no evidence of a λ-peak about the TN = 8 K indicated by the dotted line in the CP/T vs T2 plot in Figure 9b. This indicates that strong quantum fluctuations persist upon Zn2+ substitution. The CP/T vs T2 data of x = 0 and x = 0.1 between 1.8 and 109 K was linear and could be fitted well using the Debye–Einstein equation to determine the electronic (γ) and phonon ( βD) contribution to the heat capacity.

3.5. 7

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Heat capacity data for the x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 samples. Panel (a) shows the CP/T vs T data between 1.8 and 120 K. Panel (b) shows the low-temperature CP/T vs T2 data. Debye–Einstein fits for the x = 0 and x = 0.1 data between 1.8 and 109 K are shown by the black lines. The horizontal dotted lines at 8 and 4 K indicate the TN of x = 0.1 and spin-freezing temperature of x = 0.2, respectively, determined from the TF-μSR measurements.

The γ-contribution was almost zero for x = 0 (γ = 1.4(1) mJ mol–1 K–2), in agreement with previous reports, where γ = 3.5(4) mJ mol–1 K–2.18 The value of γ was also close to zero for x = 0.1 (γ = 8.6(1) mJ mol–1 K–2). The low-temperature CP/T vs T2 data for x = 0.2 and x = 0.3 could not be fitted using eq 7. The x = 0.2 data shown in red in Figure 9b deviates slightly from linear behavior and has a slight bump at 4 K (dotted line). This is close to the spin-freezing transition identified in the TF-μSR measurements, so an association may be formed with this. The x = 0.3 data in black deviates from linear behavior as the temperature decreases, leading to an upturn below 4 K. The upturn indicates a clear change in the behavior between x = 0.2 and x = 0.3.

4. Discussion

Zn2+ was successfully substituted for Cu2+ within the spin ladder, forming a monoclinic Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6 solid solution. In-depth magnetic characterization using both bulk and local techniques showed that the spin ladder behavior changes as the Zn2+ concentration increases. Replacing magnetic Cu2+ with non-magnetic Zn2+ breaks local magnetic interactions in the system. Percolation theory can be used to explain the effects of such non-magnetic impurities on different spin systems.20,21 In this approach, below a critical impurity level known as the percolation threshold, the system contains one infinitely large cluster and smaller isolated clusters. Above this level, only isolated clusters remain. Therefore, the properties of these systems are different below and above the percolation threshold. For example, on a square, this threshold is 40.7%.20 The situation is different in one-dimensional systems such as spin chains and spin ladders. The percolation threshold is essentially zero as any finite level of impurities will break the system into isolated clusters. In a two-leg spin ladder, this occurs when two non-magnetic impurities neighbor each other, cutting the local ladder interactions.

The size of the clusters in spin ladders with non-magnetic impurities is still determined by percolation theory. We can understand the observed changes in the properties of Ba2CuTe1 – xZnxO6 by considering how the cluster size changes with increasing x. The cluster size distribution intuitively depends on the impurity concentration x and is approximated as a geometric distribution:

4. 8

ρ(l) is the probability of finding a cluster of l sites, which are mainly comprised of Cu2+S = 1/2 spins as well as potential isolated Zn2+ impurities that do not break the ladder interactions. ζ is the probability of breaking the ladder and is given by eq 9, where x is the impurity concentration that has a value between 0 and 1.

4. 9

The average cluster size () is the expected value of the geometric distribution

4. 10

Any value of x leads to segmentation of the ladder into clusters; however, below a certain critical value (xc), the clusters are large enough to form long-range magnetic order. This agrees well with the result for x = 0.1. Using eqs 9 and 10, the average cluster size for x = 0.1 is calculated as = 40 sites. There are clear oscillations in the μSR data below TN = 8 K, showing that long-range order is retained. TF-μSR measurements in Figure 7 show that the transition is gradual. This can be explained by the distribution of cluster sizes, which are ordered at slightly different temperatures. The Weiss constant and position of Tmax indicate slight weakening of the magnetic interactions. However, the susceptibility data could still be described using the isolated two-leg spin ladder model, where the reduced Jrung/Jleg ratio also supports the weakening of the ladder interactions. There are remnants of the Tmin feature from the “kink” in the low-temperature data. Also, like x = 0, the electronic contribution to the heat capacity was found to be near-zero, reflecting insulating behavior. There is some indication that the magnetic structure of x = 0.1 might be incommensurate. Low-temperature neutron diffraction would determine this, although it would require a high flux instrument given the very weak Cu2+ magnetic scattering. In any case, it is clear that the behavior of x = 0.1 closely resembles that of Ba2CuTeO6.

Curie–Weiss fitting shows further weakening of the interactions as the Zn2+ content increases. The Tmax feature is suppressed, and the Tmin upturn transitions into a large paramagnetic tail, suggesting the generation of “free” spins as Zn2+ breaks the Cu2+ interactions. Above x > 0.1, the two-leg spin ladder model began to deviate as the Tmax was suppressed. This indicates that the Zn2+ concentration has exceeded the critical value beyond which the cluster size is too small to facilitate long-range magnetic order. For x = 0.2, the expected cluster size is only = 11. There was no evidence of long-range order in the μSR data. Instead, the ZF-μSR measurements indicate frozen spins from the 1/3 recovery of the initial muon polarization below 4 K. This likely represents the formation of a long-range disordered static state, wherein the spins within clusters are statically ordered, but between clusters, the Cu2+ spins are long-range disordered. Similar to x = 0.1, the transition is gradual, reflecting the freezing of the different cluster sizes. However, the relaxation curve is not typical of static order, with a strong relaxing component at short times indicating that there is also a dynamic component to the muon relaxation. TF-μSR measurements suggest a small ∼6% fraction of dynamic electronic spins at 1.5 K. Decoupling of the ZF muon relaxation occurred at slightly weaker LF fields above 50 G compared to the >100 G required for x = 0.1, implying that dynamic electronic spins are present. The dynamic fraction arises from the portion of small clusters in the distribution in which there is too few spins to freeze.

The behavior further changes between x = 0.2 and x = 0.3. The heat capacity data of x = 0.3 shows an upturn that is not present in the x ≤ 0.2 data. There are a variety of plausible explanations for the low-temperature upturn, e.g., magnetic defects, spin fluctuations, or weak ferromagnetism.42,43 The Tmax feature is suppressed in the χ vs T curve and can no longer be described by the two-leg spin ladder model. At 1.5 K, the ZF muon relaxation is mostly dynamic with only a small frozen fraction of spins (∼14%). The expected cluster size is = 6 for x = 0.3; therefore, the small frozen fraction is likely to represent freezing of the small portion of large clusters in the distribution. Helium dilution fridge experiments would reveal whether this frozen fraction increases below 1.5 K. The LF-μSR data supports dynamic behavior, showing a gradual repolarization of the muon spins as the LF field increased. Therefore, as the average cluster size further decreases from = 6 to = 4 between x = 0.3 and x = 0.4, the system approaches a purely paramagnetic state. This leads to a Curie-like magnetic susceptibility for x ≥ 0.3, in which there is no Tmax feature.

5. Conclusions

Ba2CuTeO6 has been shown to be a versatile structure, accommodating chemical substitution at both the magnetic Cu2+ site and non-magnetic B″ sites. Non-magnetic Zn2+ substitution at the Cu2+ site produced a Ba2Cu1 – xZnxTeO6 solid solution (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.6). The results can be understood from the viewpoint of the percolation theory, whereby the Zn2+ impurities segmented the two-leg spin ladder into clusters. We observe three distinct types of behavior depending on the cluster size. For x = 0.1, the cluster size was large enough that long-range magnetic order was retained and the magnetic properties were similar to x = 0. As the cluster size is further reduced, the critical cluster size for long-range order is exceeded and a long-range disordered static state is proposed for x = 0.2. The behavior changes further between x = 0.2 and x = 0.3. Dynamic muon behavior was observed for x = 0.3, indicating a mostly paramagnetic state as the cluster size is too small to facilitate ordering or spin-freezing. This makes Ba2Cu1-xZnxTeO6 an excellent model for studying non-magnetic impurities in two-leg spin ladders as the structural disorder (apart from that introduced by Zn2+) is low and the changes in magnetic behavior closely follow that expected for the percolation of a two-leg spin ladder.

Acknowledgments

E.J.C., O.M., and C.P. acknowledge financial support from the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant No. RPG-2017-109. O.M. is grateful for funding via the Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship ECF-2021-170. A.S.G. acknowledges funding through an EPSRC Early Career Fellowship EP/T011130/1. A.S.G. and H.T. acknowledge funding through the Humboldt Foundation and the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research. Sabine Prill-Diemer is gratefully acknowledged for sample preparation and characterization. The authors thank the Science and Technology Facilities Council for beamtime allocated at ISIS through proposal RB1990046 (DOI: 10.5286/ISIS.E.RB1990046) and the Swiss Muon Source at the Paul Scherrer Institute through proposal numbers 20150959 and 20211440. The authors are grateful for access to the MPMS3 instrument at The Royce Discovery Centre at the University of Sheffield (EPSRC grant no. EP/R00661X/1) and the PPMS instrument at the University of St. Andrews (EPSRC grant no. EP/T031441/1).

Glossary

ABBREVIATIONS

QCP

quantum critical point

μSR

muon spin relaxation

QMC

Quantum Monte Carlo.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02939.

  • Curie–Weiss fitting, imaginary AC susceptibility, analysis of the muon spin relaxation data, QMC isolated two-leg spin ladder model, and average cluster size for nonmagnetic dilution of a spin ladder (PDF)

  • CIF file for Ba2Cu0.9Zn0.1TeO6 (CIF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

cm2c02939_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
cm2c02939_si_002.cif (449.1KB, cif)

References

  1. Balents L. Spin Liquids in Frustrated Magnets. Nature 2010, 464, 199–208. 10.1038/nature08917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tranquada J. M.; Sternlleb B. J.; Axe J. D.; Nakamura Y.; Uchida S. Stripe Correlations of Spins and Holes in Copper Oxide Superconductors. Nature 1995, 375, 561. 10.1038/375561a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Müller K. H.Magnetic Properties of Low-Dimensional Cuprates. In High-Tc Superconductors and Related Materials; Springer US, 2001; Vol. 89. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mustonen O.; Vasala S.; Sadrollahi E.; Schmidt K. P.; Baines C.; Walker H. C.; Terasaki I.; Litterst F. J.; Baggio-Saitovitch E.; Karppinen M. Spin-Liquid-like State in a Spin-1/2 Square-Lattice Antiferromagnet Perovskite Induced by d10-d0 Cation Mixing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1085. 10.1038/s41467-018-03435-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glamazda A.; Choi Y. S.; Do S. H.; Lee S.; Lemmens P.; Ponomaryov A. N.; Zvyagin S. A.; Wosnitza J.; Sari D. P.; Watanabe I.; Choi K. Y. Quantum Criticality in the Coupled Two-Leg Spin Ladder Ba2CuTeO6. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 184430. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.184430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee P. A.; Nagaosa N.; Wen X. G. Doping a Mott Insulator: Physics of High-Temperature Superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2006, 78, 17–85. 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sachdev S. Quantum Criticality: Competing Ground States in Low Dimensions. Science 2000, 288, 475–480. 10.1126/science.288.5465.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mustonen O.; Vasala S.; Schmidt K. P.; Sadrollahi E.; Walker H. C.; Terasaki I.; Litterst F. J.; Baggio-Saitovitch E.; Karppinen M. Tuning the S = 1/2 Square-Lattice Antiferromagnet Sr2Cu(Te1-xWx)O6 from Néel Order to Quantum Disorder to Columnar Order. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 064411 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.064411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kohl P.; Reinen D. Structural and Spectroscopic Investigations on Ba2CuTeO6. Z. anorg. allg. Chem. 1974, 409, 257–272. 10.1002/zaac.19744090302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbs A. S.; Yamamoto A.; Yaresko A. N.; Knight K. S.; Yasuoka H.; Majumder M.; Baenitz M.; Saines P. J.; Hester J. R.; Hashizume D.; Kondo A.; Kindo K.; Takagi H. S = 12 Quantum Critical Spin Ladders Produced by Orbital Ordering in Ba2CuTeO6. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 104428. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.104428. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Furuya S. C.; Dupont M.; Capponi S.; Laflorencie N.; Giamarchi T. Dimensional Modulation of Spontaneous Magnetic Order in Quasi-Two-Dimensional Quantum Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 144403. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.144403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Macdougal D.; Gibbs A. S.; Ying T.; Wessel S.; Walker H. C.; Voneshen D.; Mila F.; Takagi H.; Coldea R. Spin Dynamics of Coupled Spin Ladders near Quantum Criticality in Ba2CuTeO6. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 174410. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.174410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Troyer M.; Zhitomirsky M. E.; Ueda K. Nearly Critical Ground State of LaCuO2.5. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55, R6117–R6120. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R6117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chitov G. Y.; Ramakko B. W.; Azzouz M. Quantum Criticality in Dimerized Spin Ladders. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 224433. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.224433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sachdev S. Quantum Magnetism and Criticality. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 173–185. 10.1038/nphys894. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vojta M. Frustration and Quantum Criticality. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018, 81, 064501 10.1088/1361-6633/aab6be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sachdev S.; Keimer B. Quantum Criticality. Phys. Today 2011, 64, 29–35. 10.1063/1.3554314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pughe C.; Mustonen O. H. J.; Gibbs A. S.; Etter M.; Liu C.; Dutton S. E.; Friskney A.; Hyatt N. C.; Stenning G. B. G.; Mutch H. M.; Coomer F. C.; Cussen E. J. Site-Selective d10/d0 Substitution in an S = 1/2 Spin Ladder Ba2CuTe1-xWxO6 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.3). Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 4033–4045. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mustonen O. H. J.; Pughe C. E.; Walker H. C.; Mutch H. M.; Stenning G. B. G.; Coomer F. C.; Cussen E. J. Diamagnetic D-Orbitals Drive Magnetic Structure Selection in the Double Perovskite Ba2MnTeO6. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 7070–7079. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02971. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vajk O. P.; Mang P. K.; Greven M.; Gehring P. M.; Lynn J. W. Quantum Impurities in the Two-Dimensional Spin One-Half Heisenberg Antiferromagnet. Science 2002, 295, 1691–1695. 10.1126/science.1067110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lavarélo A.; Roux G.; Laflorencie N. Magnetic Responses of Randomly Depleted Spin Ladders. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 134420. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.134420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnston D. C.; Troyer M.; Miyahara S.; Lidsky D.; Ueda K.; Azuma M.; Hiroi Z.; Takano M.; Isobe M.; Ueda Y.; Korotin M. A.; Anisimov V. I.; Mahajan A. V.; Miller L. L.. Magnetic Susceptibilities of Spin-1/2 Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Ladders and Applications to Ladder Oxide Compounds. 2000. arXiv preprint cond-mat/0001147, No. February.
  23. Nagaosa N.; Furusaki A.; Sigrist M.; Fukuyama H. Non-Magnetic Impurities in Spin Gap Systems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 65, 3724. 10.1143/JPSJ.65.3724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Iino Y.; Imada M. Effects of Nonmagnetic Impurity Doping on Spin Ladder System. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 3728–3731. 10.1143/JPSJ.65.3728. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kanbur U.; Polat H.; Vatansever E. Thermal Properties of Rung-Disordered Two-Leg Quantum Spin Ladders: Quantum Monte Carlo Study. Phys. Rev. E 2020, 102, 042104 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.042104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schmidiger D.; Povarov K. Y.; Galeski S.; Reynolds N.; Bewley R.; Guidi T.; Ollivier J.; Zheludev A. Emergent Interacting Spin Islands in a Depleted Strong-Leg Heisenberg Ladder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 257203. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.257203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Krasnikova Y. V.; Glazkov V. N.; Ponomaryov A.; Zvyagin S. A.; Povarov K. Y.; Galeski S.; Zheludev A. Electron Spin Resonance Study of Spin Relaxation in the Strong-Leg Spin Ladder with Nonmagnetic Dilution. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 144446. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fukaya A.; Higemoto W.; Hagiwara M.; Nagamine K. μSR Study of a Spin-Ladder System (Cu1-xZnx)2(1,4-Diazacycloheptane)2Cl4. Phys. B 2000, 289-290, 189–193. 10.1016/S0921-4526(00)00361-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bobroff J.; Laflorencie N.; Alexander L. K.; Mahajan A. V.; Koteswararao B.; Mendels P. Impurity-Induced Magnetic Order in Low-Dimensional Spin-Gapped Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 047201 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.047201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mikeska H.-J.; Neugebauer U.; Schollwöck U. Spin Ladders with Nonmagnetic Impurities. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55, 2955–2963. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.2955. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fortes A. D.; Gibbs A. S. HRPD-X; a Proposed Upgrade to the ISIS High-Resolution Powder Diffractometer. J. Neutron Res. 2020, 22, 91–98. 10.3233/JNR-190130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ibberson R. M. Design and Performance of the New Supermirror Guide on HRPD at ISIS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 2009, 600, 47–49. 10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Larson A. C.; Von Dreele R. B. General Structure Analysis System (GSAS). Los Alamos Natl. Lab., [Rep.] LA (U. S.) 2004, 86–748. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cumby J.; Attfield J. P. Ellipsoidal Analysis of Coordination Polyhedra. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14235. 10.1038/ncomms14235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Coelho A. A. TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: An Optimization Program Integrating Computer Algebra and Crystallographic Objects Written in C++. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2018, 51, 210–218. 10.1107/S1600576718000183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Suter A.; Wojek B. M. Musrfit: A Free Platform-Independent Framework for ΜsR Data Analysis. Phys. Procedia 2012, 30, 69–73. 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.04.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Blundell S. J. Spin-Polarized Muons in Condensed Matter Physics. Contemp. Phys. 1999, 40, 175–192. 10.1080/001075199181521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Amato A. Heavy-Fermion Systems Studied by ΜSR Technique. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1997, 69, 1119–1180. 10.1103/RevModPhys.69.1119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Amato A.; Feyerherm R.; Gygax F. N.; Schenck A.; Löhneysen H. v.; Schlager H. G. Muon-Spin-Relaxation Studies on the Heavy-Fermion System with Non-Fermi-Liquid Behavior CeCu5.9Au0.1. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 52, 54–56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Xiao F.; Blackmore W. J. A.; Huddart B. M.; Gomilšek M.; Hicken T. J.; Baines C.; Baker P. J.; Pratt F. L.; Blundell S. J.; Lu H.; Singleton J.; Gawryluk D.; Turnbull M. M.; Krämer K. W.; Goddard P. A.; Lancaster T. Magnetic Order and Disorder in a Quasi-Two-Dimensional Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnet with Randomized Exchange. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 174429. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.174429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hong W.; Liu L.; Liu C.; Ma X.; Koda A.; Li X.; Song J.; Yang W.; Yang J.; Cheng P.; Zhang H.; Bao W.; Ma X.; Chen D.; Sun K.; Guo W.; Luo H.; Sandvik A. W.; Li S. Extreme Suppression of Antiferromagnetic Order and Critical Scaling in a Two-Dimensional Random Quantum Magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 037201 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.037201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yadam S.; Singh D.; Venkateshwarlu D.; Gangrade M. K.; Samatham S. S.; Ganesan V. Magneto-Heat Capacity Study on Kondo Lattice System Ce(Ni1-xCux)2Al3. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2016, 39, 537–541. 10.1007/s12034-016-1157-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Acharya S.; Anwar S.; Mori T.; Soni A. Coupling of Charge Carriers with Magnetic Entropy for Power Factor Enhancement in Mn Doped Sn1.03Te for Thermoelectric Applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 6489–6493. 10.1039/C8TC00788H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cm2c02939_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
cm2c02939_si_002.cif (449.1KB, cif)

Articles from Chemistry of Materials are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES