ABSTRACT
Detection of new viruses or new virus hosts is essential for the protection of economically important agroecosystems and human health. Increasingly, metatranscriptomic data are being used to facilitate this process. Such data were obtained from adult Asian citrus psyllids (ACP) (Diaphorina citri Kuwayama) that fed solely on mandarin (Citrus ×aurantium L.) plants grafted with buds infected with ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas), a phloem-limited bacterium associated with the severe Asian variant of huanglongbing (HLB), the most destructive disease of citrus. Brassica yellows virus (BrYV), the causative agent of yellowing or leafroll symptoms in brassicaceous plants, and its associated RNA (named as BrYVaRNA) were detected in ACP. In addition, the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), which affects pigs and is economically important to pig production, was also found in ACP. These viruses were not detected in insects feeding on plants grafted with CLas-free buds. Changes in the concentrations of insect-specific viruses within the psyllid were caused by coinfection with CLas.
IMPORTANCE The cross transmission of pathogenic viruses between different farming systems or plant communities is a major threat to plants and animals and, potentially, human health. The use of metagenomics is an effective approach to discover viruses and vectors. Here, we collected buds from the CLas-infected and CLas-free mandarin (Citrus ×aurantium L. [Rutaceae: Aurantioideae: Aurantieae]) trees from a commercial orchard and grafted them onto CLas-free mandarin plants under laboratory conditions. Through metatranscriptome sequencing, we first identified the Asian citrus psyllids feeding on plants grafted with CLas-infected buds carried the plant pathogen, brassica yellows virus and its associated RNA, and the swine pathogen, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. These discoveries indicate that both viruses can be transmitted by grafting and acquired by ACP from CLas+ mandarin seedlings.
KEYWORDS: Asian citrus psyllid, virus, brassica yellows virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, metatranscriptomics
INTRODUCTION
Plants are infected with a diverse range of microbes that interact with their host and with each other. The majority of these microbes are not causal agents of disease (1), and many promote plant growth (2, 3) while others facilitate resistance to various plant pathogens (4). In addition to these endosymbiotic organisms, coinfections of multiple pathogens are common (5), and citrus trees in orchards are no exception often containing mixed infections of various pathogens, including viruses, many of which can be transmitted by arthropod vectors (6). The extent of these multiple infections and their interactions with each other and with their insect hosts is slowly being revealed due to the development of new molecular tools, especially next generation sequencing (7). After long-term, continuous interactions, once these viruses can colonize an insect’s gut, there is the possibility of phyllosphere transmission by insect vectors (8, 9).
Brassica yellows virus (BrYV) is a recently discovered virus that mainly infects cruciferous vegetables in which it causes mottling, yellowing, or leaf roll symptoms (10, 11). It infects a range of brassicaceous plants, including members of the genera Brassica, Raphanus, and Sinapis (12). BrYV was first identified in China in 2011 (10) and is tentatively placed in the genus Polerovirus (Solemoviridae); it has since been reported in Korea (11), Japan (13) and Australia (14). Molecular and phylogenetic studies show BrYV is closely related to turnip yellows virus (TuYV: Luteoviridae) (10, 14, 15), which has been reported throughout Europe, South Africa, China, Iran, Egypt, South Africa, Egypt, Morocco, and Australia, and infects crops and weeds, including members of the Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Amaranthaceae and Asteraceae (see references in [14]). Poleroviruses are mostly transmitted by aphids in a circulative and nonreplicative mode (16–19); one known polerovirus is transmitted by whiteflies, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) (20). A recent study showed that the expression of polerovirus proteins mediates changes in plant-aphid interactions and inhibits aphid induction of jasmonic acid signaling in plant hosts (21).
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome was first recognized in the United States in 1987 and has become one of the most important diseases affecting the global pig industry (22, 23). The causative agent of the syndrome, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV: Nidoviridales: Arteriviridae), is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus, and possesses a genome ca. 15 kb in length (24). Two genotypes of PRRSV can be found, the European (type 1) and North American (type 2) types that share only approximately 60% nucleotide similarity (25). The virus was first isolated in China in 1996 (26) and has evolved quickly and spread widely during the last 2 decades, causing large economic losses (27–29). To date, it has mainly been detected in domesticated pigs and wild boars (30). However, PRRSV can be acquired by mosquitoes (Aedes vexans (Meigen) (Diptera: Culicidae) and houseflies (Musca domestica L. [Diptera: Muscidae]) from infected pigs and in which it can be retained for a short period; the virus did not replicate within the insects (31–34). It can be mechanically transmitted by mosquitoes and houseflies, but the insects could not serve as biological vectors (31, 32).
Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Asian citrus psyllid, ACP) (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae) is an economically important pest of citrus. It is the major vector of the pathogenic bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas), which is the putative causal agent of the most severe form of huanglongbing (HLB), the most serious disease of citrus (35). Besides spreading HLB, ACP harbors phytopathogenic viruses such as Citrus tristeza virus (CTV: Closteroviridae) (36) and several putative insect-specific viruses, including Diaphorina citri-associated C virus (DcACV: family not assigned), Diaphorina citri bunyavirus (DcBV: Bunyaviridae), Diaphorina citri cimodo-like virus (DcCLV: Reoviridae), Diaphorina citri densovirus (DcDNV: Parvoviridae), Diaphorina citri flavi-like virus (DcFLV: Flaviviridae), Diaphorina citri picorna-like virus (DcPLV: Picorna-like virus), and Diaphorina citri reovirus (DcRV: Rheoviridae) (37–40).
Traditional viral screening often uses PCR and qPCR (38, 41), which depend on prior knowledge of the viral sequences. The technology of metatranscriptomics, based on high-throughput sequencing, can accurately and efficiently determine the RNA viromes present in tissue and environmental samples (42), including plants (43), mammals (44), and arthropods (39). In this study, metatranscriptomics and transmission electron microscopy were used to discover to uncover the composition of the viromes of ACP that may have been acquired from bud grafts taken from CLas+ and CLas– plants, to determine if the virome composition differs due to coinfection with CLas. Two viruses, the brassica yellows virus and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, are the first reports in ACP.
RESULTS
TEM shows that viruses colonized in the filter chamber and midgut loop of the CLas+ ACP and passed into intestinal epithelial cells by incorporation of secretory granules (Fig. 1 A, D). Large accumulations of BrYV-like and PRRSV-like particles can be observed in the apical region close to microvilli (MV) in the intestinal lumen (Fig. 1C), close to the basal lamina (BL) (Fig. 1D), or between these locations (Fig. 1A, B). In addition, degradation of the intestinal microvilli was detected (Fig. 1A, C).
FIG 1.
Transmission electron micrographs of cross section of gut tissues of CLas infected D. citri. A and B, cross section of filter chamber; C and D, cross section of midgut loop. Red arrows indicated viruses. MV, microvilli; WG, White secretory granule; ML, Muscle layer; MT, mitochondrion; IL, Intestinal lumen; CM, Cell membrane; HM, Hemocoel; SV, Secretory vesicle; BRL, BRYV-like; PRL, PRRSV-like; CLasV, CLas vertical section; CLas oblique section; CLasO, CLas oblique section; CLasC, CLas cross section. Scale bar 1000 nm.
A total of 38,676,951 and 34,843,908 clean reads were obtained from the CLas– and CLas+ samples, respectively. The presence of viral sequences from over 13 different viral families were identified from the Kaiju classification (Fig. 2) and a BLAST search, including DcDNV, DcPLV, DcRV, and citrus tristeza virus (CTV: Closteroviridae) (Table S1). The highest proportion of reads derived from both the CLas– and CLas+ samples came from the Microviridae. However, distinct differences in the proportions of reads from the other virus family were detected between the two sets of samples. Most notably, the CLas+ samples contained a high proportion of reads from the Parvoviridae and a smaller proportion from the Phycodnaviridae. In addition, two viruses, BrYV and porcine reproductive and PRRSV, were only detected in the CLas+ samples (Table S1).
FIG 2.
Viral composition of CLas-and CLas+ samples of D. citri. Relative proportions were determined by the number of reads classified to each virus clades using Kaiju.
Putative insect-specific viruses.
First, DcDNV sequences were identified in CLas+ (2 contigs) and CLas– (3 contigs) samples of the Guangdong population. These sequences ranged from 326 to 2,339 nucleotides (nt) in length and showed >98% similarity to an isolate from a Taiwan population. Second, a BLAST search showed that contigs of 9,951 and 9,920 nt amplified from CLas+ and CLas– samples both showed 96.0% similarity to DcPLV found in an ACP population in Brazil. Lastly, a total of 111 contigs from CLas+ samples and 10 contigs from CLas– samples were identified as DcRV and showed >99% similarity to the DcRV-FL isolate recorded in Florida.
Citrus tristeza virus.
The Kaiju classification and BLAST searches confirmed that 5 and 15 contigs from CLas+ and CLas– ACP samples, respectively, as CTV sequences. The contigs ranged from 260 to 3,997 nt in length and had a close relation to the CTV-FN08 isolate from Guangdong, China.
Brassica yellows virus sequence.
A contig of 5,465 nt found in the CLas+ sample was named as BrYV-DC; this virus was not detected in the CLas– samples. It has the typical genomic organization of the BrYV genome, including 6 ORFs (ORF0–ORF5; Fig. 3A). The 5′ untranslated region (UTR) region was missing, while the 3′-UTR and ORF0 were incomplete.
FIG 3.
(A) Gene organization of BrYV-DC and its close related isolates; (B) Phylogenomic inference of BrYV using maximum likelihood method and a TIM2+F+R3 model. Circles on the nodes indicate bootstrap values ≥95.
To compare the new BrYV isolate obtained from ACP to previously characterized BrYV isolates (Table S2), a phylogenetic analysis using maximum likelihood (ML) was performed. The analysis showed most of the BrYV isolates being in the same monophyletic clade. BrYV-DC clustered with BrYV-CC and BrYV-CR, which were both associated with the plant host Raphanus raphanistrum L. (wild radish; Brassicales: Brassicaceae) (Fig. 3B).
An additional contig of 2,404 nt was amplified from the CLas+ sample and shares 95.1% nt identity with a partial sequence of the Turnip yellows virus (TuYV)-associated RNA (TuYVaRNA; MN497833) and 94.9% nt identity with the complete sequence of beet western yellows virus (BWYV)-associated RNA (BWYVaRNA: KF533709). It has a typical genomic organization of Polerovirus-associated RNAs, encoding overlapping ORF1a and ORF1b (Fig. 4A). Compared with other TuYVaRNAs and BWYVaRNAs (Table S3), the contig from ACP forms a unique lineage in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4B). Thus, we propose the name “brassica yellows virus-associated RNA” (BrYVaRNA) for this newly identified RNA.
FIG 4.
(A) Gene organization of BrYVaRNA-DC and its close related isolates; (B) Phylogenetic inference of virus-associated RNAs sequences using maximum likelihood method and a TVMe+R2 substitution model. Circles on the nodes indicate bootstrap values ≥95.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
A total of 11 contigs from the CLas+ sample (defined as PRRSV-DC in this study), ranging from 301 to 1,664 nt in length, were identified as PRRSV type 2 (Table S1). To infer the phylogenetic position of PRRSV-DC, we obtained 1,198 PRRSV type 2 and one PRRSV type 1 isolates from NCBI (Table S4). Based on the sequences of ORF5, phylogenetic analysis showed that PRRSV-DC belongs to the North American type (type 2) and grouped with isolates rV63, rV68, YN-2011, BJ4, GS2002, GS2003, and GS2004 (Fig. 5).
FIG 5.
Phylogenetic inference of Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus (PRRSV) based on the ORF5 sequences using maximum likelihood method and a SYM+R6 substitution model. Circles on the nodes indicate bootstrap values ≥95.
DISCUSSION
Brassica yellows virus sequences.
BrYV usually infects cruciferous crops; however, the most recent studies of this virus have found it in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. [Solanales: Solanaceae]) (45) and strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne [Rosales: Rosaceae]) (46). In this study, we report a novel BrYV isolate associated with ACP that had fed on plants grafted with CLas+ buds. Our findings expand the insect and plant host range of BrYV; the virus has never been reported in members of the Rutaceae nor in ACP. In addition, this is the first report of the genomic sequence of BrYVaRNA in any plant; its original host plant(s) including orchard species and roadside weeds, need (s) to be determined. Some Polerovirus-associated RNAs cause severe of symptoms when in combination with a helper virus, e.g., BWYV ST9-associated RNA and Carrot red leaf virus-associated RNA (47). In addition, associated RNAs may help viruses avoid plant immunity and enhance infection. For example, the βC1 protein encoded by the satellite tomato yellow leaf curl China virus (TYLCCNV)-associated betasatellite (TYLCCNB) interacts with DEMETER in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Brassicales: Brassicaceae), which facilitates DNA glycosylase activity to decrease viral DNA methylation thereby promoting viral virulence (48). This is different from our previous understanding that viruses usually evolve in the direction of reduced pathogenicity. Therefore, the exploration of the mechanisms of BrYV transmission from its usual host is needed to facilitate crop biosecurity, particularly as host substitution often leads to virus mutation and the occurrence of new strains.
Our study suggests that BrYV can be transmitted by grafting, exist in CLas+ plants, and be acquired by ACP. The successful colonization of BrYV in mandarin in orchards is most likely related to transmission by other insect vectors—particularly phloem-feeding insects other than ACP—commonly found on citrus. There is also a possibility that organisms in the soil rhizosphere, phyllosphere fungi or microbial biofilms could be involved in transmission. For example, COVID-19 can be transmitted through biofilms, aerosols and wastewater (49–51). Moreover, the burning of biomass (straw and wood) in rural areas increases the black carbon, which increases the risk of COVID-19 spreading with aerosols (52). In addition, there is a strong fungal network in the rhizosphere of plants in the soil, which helps plants recruit microorganisms (53). Many viruses can be acquired by fungi and their spores (54). It has been shown that viral genomic sequences account for 0.02% of the citrus rhizosphere microbiome composition (55). The complex microbial community in the rhizosphere of plants can also protect plants from diseases (56). Whether BrYV has evolved to be transmitted by fungi needs further research. BrYV is transmitted by aphids (57) and five species, Aphis (Toxoptera) aurantii Boyer de Fonscolombe, Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus (Kirkaldy), Aphis gossypii Glover, Aphis spiraecola Patch, and Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Sternorrhyncha: Aphidae), associated with plant pathogens of citrus in China (58). Of these, Aphis gossypii is known to feed on Brassica rapa L. (syn. B. campestris L.) and from which it can transmit turnip mosaic virus and cucumber mosaic virus 2 (59). Aphis spiraecola has a broad host range, feeding on plants from over 90 families (60), and can spread a range of plant viruses (61). Myzus persicae feeds on more than 400 plant species from over than 40 families, including various brassica species and can transmit over 100 virus diseases (62, 63) including BWYV and four other poleroviruses (13). Hence, aphids, especially M. persicae, should be assessed as potential vectors of BrYV from infected nonrutaceous plants to citrus; however, other phloem-feeding insects that feed on citrus should also be examined.
Our results suggest that BrYV is able to colonize the filter chamber and midgut loop of ACP. Intestinal colonization implies the potential for persistent transmission, which plays a significant role in determining transmission of the virus (64); the acquisition and transmission of this virus by ACP needs further study. The virus can colonize C. ×aurantium and the intestinal channel of ACP together with CLas. Further exploration of interactions between BrYV and CLas is needed, as virus infection can affect plant resistance to other diseases. For example, the C4 protein of TLCYnV can inhibit mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades and the subsequent induction of defense responses (65). Four MAPK cascades genes (CsMAP9, CsMAP9-like, CsPR12, and CsPR14) are associated with CLas infection (66).
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
Our study showed that PRRSV can be transmitted by grafting and acquired by ACP from CLas+ mandarin seedlings. Thus, the virus not only survives in pigs and insects (31–34), but also survives in plants. There are few reports as to how animal viruses escape from plant immunity. In the present study, PRRSV was not detected in ACP that fed on plants grafted with CLas-budwood. Whether infection with CLas influences the colonization of host plants by viruses needs to be examined. How PRRSV entered the CLas+ plants was not determined, and this also requires further study. We propose three hypotheses with regard to co-colonization of citrus by CLas and PRRSV: (1) PRRSV can spread through a biofilm involving CLas in the crown and rhizosphere of plants; (2) CLas infection leads to increased susceptibility of citrus roots permitting entry via root damage caused by other organisms and (3) a boar or other unknown animals chewed the roots of citrus.
Biofilm production is a common trait associated with soil microorganisms (67)—viruses can attach to these structures (68) and gain protection from environmental stresses (69). PRRSV may persist in the soil due to interactions with biofilms. A species of Chryseobacterium was found to be the most abundant member of the rhizosphere microbiome of citrus plants (70, 71), many species of which have the ability to form biofilms and cause denitrification in vitro (72). Evidence for a role of biofilms in transmission comes from the fact that CLas can be successfully cultured with other microorganisms in a mixed-community biofilm with neutral to alkaline pH in vitro (pH 7.0 to 8.0) (70), and the biofilm may aid the persistence of both PRRSV and BrYV. The low concentration of CLas in biofilms indicates a strict dependence on the culture environment and the composition of associated bacteria (70). In the field, aerosol ammonium might facilitate biofilm formation through increasing pH—a large amounts of ammonia will be discharged around the pig farms (73). In addition, aerosols with particulate matter formed due to the burning of biomass increase the possibility of microorganisms that are adapted to neutral or alkaline humid environments (74). The complex interactivity between cloud feedback and aerosol-clouds may affect temperatures and humidity in orchards, which can be beneficial to the dispersal of viruses into plants mediated by plant transpiration (75). Furthermore, nitrogen deposition induces eutrophication and neutralizes the pH of the water, including groundwater and that in escape canals in the limestone mountains, which could increase the risk of microbial aggregation through bridging bacteria (74, 76). Due to the lack of nutrition data required by different plants at different growth stages in different climatic regions and the absence of biosensors, even intelligent water and fertilizer integration facilities often cause excessive water and fertilizer irrigation. Excessive irrigation not only wastes resource, but also provides a hotbed for pathogenic microorganisms colonization in the orchard depressions and ditches biofilm (77, 78). In addition, too much nitrogen in the soil often leads to acidification, which could be adjusted by Chryseobacterium colonization in citrus rhizosphere and might be beneficial to CLas colonization. Soil conditioners and compound fertilizers containing calcium carbonate, aluminum sulfate or iron sulfate used in groves will alter the pH of acidic soil. Additionally, calcium and magnesium ions can increase the ability of bridging bacteria to co-aggregate in biofilms in soil or wastewater (74). Hence, microbial biofilm formation in soil and groundwater might increase the risk of the co-transmission of PRRSV, BrYV and CLas. In addition, smelting and mining not only pollutes soil, causing heavy metal toxicity, but also increases the risk of transmission viruses and bacteria though reducing soil microbial diversity (79).
In the hypothesis of susceptibility caused by CLas, weakness of trees and poor immune balance of plants caused by CLas may lead to susceptibility to viruses. For example, sec-delivered effectors (SDE15) secreted by CLas can inhibit multiple members of papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs), which are extracellular broad-spectrum defense proteins (80, 81).
In China, pig farms are often located close to mountains, and orchards are often distributed in the mountains or at the foot of mountains; the orchard used in our study and a pig farm are located on a hillside. A route via the soil may be possible and facilitated by long-term fertilization with manure and mediated by root damage caused by soilborne pathogens. In addition, orchards are often attacked by wild boars or mice, which may also be a source of PRRSV.
Host substitution often leads to virus mutation and the occurrence of new strains. A partial genome was obtained in this study, with three situations: the virus is not fully adapted to the ACP and cannot replicate completely; the virus exists in ACP at a low concentration, suggesting that the virus cannot not replicate in insects (32, 33). The low concentration of the virus did not permit the de novo assembly of the virus, but the sequence data suggest parts are mutated which could lead to the formation of a new strain.
Citrus tristeza virus.
Citrus tristeza virus was detected in the ACP populations feeding of plants grafted with both CLas+ and CLas– buds. It is probable, therefore, that this virus was widely distributed in the orchard from which the buds were sourced. Only a partial genome sequence of CTV was obtained from these two ACP populations, suggesting that the virus is maintained at a low titer. Our results show that BrYV and PRRSV could colonize in the filter chamber and midgut loop of ACP that carry CTV. In Florida, presence of CTV widespread in ACP sourced throughout the state (82). This study found a relatively low abundance of CTV sequences compared to those of DcACV, as was also found in this current study in China and that of Britt et al. (82) suggest that CTV is likely a part of the citrus phloem contents consumed during ACP-feeding. Various interactions occur between liberibacters and CTV within their plant hosts. In Florida, coinfection of CLas with five strains of CTV did not result in any synergistic effects within different citrus cultivars as judged by symptoms or accumulation of the pathogens (83). However, a study by Fu et al. (84) found that coinfection of sweet orange with a mild-strain of CTV gave limited protection against CLas whereas the interaction of a severe strain and CLas was synergistic. Working with the ‘Ca. L. africanus’ in South Africa, van Vuuren et al. (85) found that some protection against the African form of HLB was conferred by infection with CTV. Therefore, the interactions between different strains of CTV and CLas needs further study.
Conclusion.
This study using metatranscriptomic data have shown differences the viromes of ACP that had fed on CLas– and CLas+ plants. In addition, this study is the first to find BrYV in ACP and to find its associated Polerovirus-associated RNAs, BrYVaRNA, in any host. The study also found PRRSV in the psyllid. The whole genome of BrYV and partial genome of PRRSV were de novo assembled. To determine the source of these viruses, further metagenomic studies should be undertaken that incorporate the plants, soils and insects that occur in and around the citrus grove. In addition, due to the potential for persistent transmission by insect vectors, transmission studies of psyllids infected with these viruses urgently need to be undertaken.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant and insect material.
CLas-infected ‘Shatangju’ potted mandarin trees were collected from Boluo County (23°30′50.19″ N, 114°37′3.05″ E) in east-central Guangdong province, China, and buds from them were cut and grafted onto CLas–free mandarin plants. Buds from the CLas-free plants were also budded onto CLas–free mandarin plants to act as controls. All the grafted citrus plants were kept in a small, insect-proof net house. After 6 months, each plant was assayed by qPCR for the presence of CLas with the primer pair, HLBas/HLBr, targeting the 16S rRNA gene (86). The infected (CLas+) ‘Shatangju’ plants with CT values <25, and the uninfected (CLas-) control with CT values >36 were chosen for further experimentation.
A laboratory strain of ACP collected from Murraya paniculata (L.) Jack (Aurantieae) at South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, in 2013, was used in the present study. The strain had been maintained on M. paniculata in controlled environment chambers under a 14 h: 10 h light: dark cycle at 28 ± 1°C and 60% relative humidity for more than 25 generations.
Third to fourth instar psyllid nymphs were selected and reared on the CLas+ and uninfected (CLas–) ‘Shatangju’ plants for 14 days under a 14 h: 10 h light: dark cycle at 28 ± 1°C and 50–60% relative humidity. After this period, the heads of individual adult psyllids were dissected for DNA extraction using a Tiangen DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) following which the CLas status of each individual was determined by qPCR as above.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
The abdomen of a CLas-infected ACP adult was dissected then fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2) at 4°C overnight. The tissue was then rinsed in 0.1 M PBS, secondarily fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PBS at room temperature for 4 h then embedded in Spurr’s resin. Sections (100 nm) of abdomen tissue were cut with a diamond knife, stained with 2% uranyl acetate and alkaline lead citrate. Sections were then examined using a transmission electron microscope (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp., Danvers, MA, United States) and photographed using a digital camera (Morgagni 268, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, United States).
RNA extraction, RNA-seq and sequences assembly.
Two aliquots of 20 adult CLas+ and two aliquots 20 CLas– ACP were each pooled to constitute a sample to give two samples of each psyllid type and the thoraxes and abdomens ground in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted from each sample using TRIzol. Three biological replicates were made from every sample to give 12 extracts in total and used for RNA-seq. The resulting Illumina reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.33 (87) to remove the adapters and low-quality sequences (Q ≤ 25). Trinity v2.13.0 (88) was then used for the de novo assembly of contigs from the trimmed RNA-seq reads. All data from each psyllid type were combined for analysis.
Sequence analysis.
The reads and assembled contigs were preliminarily classified using the Kaiju virus database (89). Then, targeted contigs were subjected to a BLAST search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Viral sequences were aligned using MAFFT v7.471 with the l-INS-I strategy (90) and maximum likelihood (ML) trees were constructed using IQ-TREE 2.0 (91) to infer the phylogenetic relationships.
Data availability.
All the RNA samples are deposited in −80°C refrigerator in the College of Natural Resource and Environment of China Agricultural University. And all the raw data and clean data of metatranscriptome sequencing are deposited in the private account of corresponding author of data storage center of College of Advanced Agricultural Science of Zhejiang A&F University. The newly generated viral sequences were deposited in https://github.com/ljmhaha/data.of.ACP.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The present work was funded by the Zhejiang A&F University impulse project (2019FR029) and Innovative Talents Training Project for Doctoral Students of South China Agricultural University (CX2017N004). We thank Yijing Cen for helping us to get in touch with the orchard. We also thank Taiyun Wei and Chuanxi Zhang for giving us suggestions on virus detection.
Yanjing Wang conceived the ideas and designed methodology; Lixia Zeng and Yanjing Wang collected the data; Jinming Lu, Yanjing Wang, and Paul Holford analyzed the data; Jinming Lu, Paul Holford, George A. C. Beattie, and Yanjing Wang led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Yanjing Wang, Email: 20180062@zafu.edu.cn, 229141154@qq.com.
Daifeng Cheng, South China Agricultural University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM. 2013. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:634–663. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Redman RS, Sheehan KB, Stout RG, Rodriguez RJ, Henson JM. 2022. Thermotolerance generated by plant/fungal symbiosis. Science 298:1581. doi: 10.1126/science.1078055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Compant S, Reiter B, Sessitsch A, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA. 2005. Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1685–1693. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1685-1693.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arnold AE, Mejía LC, Kyllo D, Rojas EI, Maynard Z, Robbins N, Herre EA. 2003. Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15649–15654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2533483100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Susi H, Barrès B, Vale PF, Laine AL. 2015. Co-infection alters population dynamics of infectious disease. Nat Commun 6:1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saponari M, Loconsole G, Liao HH, Jiang B, Savino V, Yokomi RK. 2013. Validation of high-throughput real time polymerase chain reaction assays for simultaneous detection of invasive citrus pathogens. J Virol Methods 193:478–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Borer ET, Laine AL, Seabloom EW. 2016. A multiscale approach to plant disease using the metacommunity concept. Annu Rev Phytopathol 54:397–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-095959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bomo LM, Orton RJ, Peredo EL, Morrison HG, Sistrom M, Simmons S, Turner PE. 2019. Spatiotemporal dynamics of RNA virus diversity in a phyllosphere microbial community. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/772475. [DOI]
- 9.Wang XW, Blanc S. 2021a. Insect transmission of plant single-stranded DNA viruses. Annu Rev Entomol 66:21.1–21.17. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-060920-094531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xiang H-Y, Dong S-W, Shang Q-X, Zhou C-J, Li D-W, Yu J-L, Han C-G. 2011. Molecular characterization of two genotypes of a new polerovirus infecting brassicas in China. Arch Virol 156:2251–2255. doi: 10.1007/s00705-011-1091-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lim S, Yoo RH, Igori D, Zhao F, Kim KH, Moon JS. 2015. Genome sequence of a recombinant brassica yellows virus infecting Chinese cabbage. Arch Virol 160:597–600. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2258-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang XY, Xiang HY, Zhou CJ, Li DW, Yu JL, Han CG. 2014. Complete genome sequence analysis identifies a new genotype of brassica yellows virus that infects cabbage and radish in China. Arch Virol 159:2177–2180. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2027-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoshida N, Tamada T. 2019. Host range and molecular analysis of Beet leaf yellowing virus, Beet western yellows virus-JP and Brassica yellows virus in Japan. Plant Pathol 68:1045–1058. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Filardo F, Nancarrow N, Kehoe M, McTaggart AR, Congdon B, Kumari S, Aftab M, Trębicki P, Rodoni B, Thomas J, Sharman M. 2021. Genetic diversity and recombination between turnip yellows virus strains in Australia. Arch Virol 166:813–829. doi: 10.1007/s00705-020-04931-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buxton-Kirk A, Adams I, Ward LFR, Kelly M, Forde S, Skelton A, Harju V, Baucas NS, BasIlan MAG, Joshi RC, Reeder RH, Annamalai S, Fox A, Fowkes A. 2021. First report of Turnip yellows virus in cabbage in the Philippines. New Dis Rep 44:e12020. doi: 10.1002/ndr2.12020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stevens M, Smith HG, Hallsworth PB. 1995. Detection of the luteoviruses, beet mild yellowing virus and beet western yellows virus, in aphids caught in sugar-beet and oilseed rape crops, 1990–1993. Ann Appl Biol 127:309–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb06675.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schliephake E, Graichen K, Rabenstein F. 2000. Investigations on the vector transmission of the Beet mild yellowing virus (BMYV) and the Turnip yellows virus (TuYV). J Plant Dis Prot 107:81–87. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kaplan IB, Lee L, Ripoll DR, Palukaitis P, Gildow F, Gray SM. 2007. Point mutations in the potato leafroll virus major capsid protein alter virion stability and aphid transmission. J Gen Virol 88:1821–1830. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82837-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mulot M, Monsion B, Boissinot S, Rastegar M, Meyer S, Bochet N, Brault V. 2018. Transmission of turnip yellows virus by Myzus persicae is reduced by feeding aphids on double-stranded RNA targeting the ephrin receptor protein. Front Microbiol 9:457. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ghosh S, Kanakala S, Lebedev G, Kontsedalov S, Silverman D, Alon T, Mor N, Sela N, Luria N, Dombrovsky A, Mawassi M, Haviv S, Czosnek H, Ghanim M. 2019. Transmission of a new polerovirus infecting pepper by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. J Virol 93:e00488-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00488-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Patton MF, Bak A, Sayre JM, Heck ML, Casteel CL. 2020. A polerovirus, Potato leafroll virus, alters plant–vector interactions using three viral proteins. Plant Cell Environ 43:387–399. doi: 10.1111/pce.13684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Collins JE, Benfield DA, Christianson WT, Harris L, Hennings JC, Shaw DP, Goyal SM, McCullough S, Morrison RB, Joo HS. 1992. Isolation of swine infertility and respiratory syndrome virus (isolate ATCC VR-2332) in North America and experimental reproduction of the disease in gnotobiotic pigs. J Vet Diagn Invest 4:117–126. doi: 10.1177/104063879200400201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chand RJ, Trible BR, Rowland RRR. 2012. Pathogenesis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Curr Opin Virol 2:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dea S, Gagnon CA, Mardassi H, Pirzadeh B, Rogan D. 2000. Current knowledge on the structural proteins of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus: comparison of the North American and European isolates. Arch Virol 145:659–688. doi: 10.1007/s007050050662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nelsen CJ, Murtaugh MP, Faaberg KS. 1999. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus comparison: divergent evolution on two continents. J Virol 73:270–280. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.1.270-280.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Valicek L, Psikal I, Smíd B, Rodák L, Kubalíková R, Kosinová E. 1997. Isolation and identification of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in cell cultures. Vet Med 42:281–287. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00309-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tong G, Zhou YJ, Hao XF, Tian ZJ, An TQ, Qiu HJ. 2007. Highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, China. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1434–1436. doi: 10.3201/eid1309.070399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jiang Y, Li G, Yu L, Li L, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Tong W, Liu C, Gao F, Tong G. 2020. Genetic diversity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) from 1996 to 2017 in China. Front Microbiol 11:618. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu F, Yan Y, Shi M, Liu HZ, Zhang HL, Yang YB, Huang XY, Gauger PC, Zhang JQ, Zhang YH, Tong GZ, Tian ZJ, Chen JJ, Cai XH, Liu D, Li GW, An TQ. 2020. Phylogenetics, genomic recombination, and NSP2 polymorphic patterns of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China and the United States in 2014–2018. J Virol 94:e01813. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01813-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reiner G, Fresen C, Bronnert S, Willems H. 2009. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) infection in wild boars. Vet Microbiol 136:250–258. 30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Otake S, Dee SA, Rossow KD, Moon RD, Pijoan C. 2002. Mechanical transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by mosquitoes, Aedes vexans (Meigen). Can J Vet Res 66:191–195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Otake S, Dee SA, Moon RD, Rossow KD, Trincado C, Pijoan C. 2003. Evaluation of mosquitoes, Aedes vexans, as biological vectors of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Can J Vet Res 67:265–270. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schurrer JA, Dee SA, Moon RD, Murtaugh MP, Finnegan CP, Deen J, Kleiboeker SB, Pijoan CBJ. 2005. Retention of ingested porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in houseflies. Am J Vet Res 66:1517–1525. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pitkin A, Deen J, Otake S, Moon R, Dee R. 2009. Further assessment of houseflies (Musca domestica) as vectors for the mechanical transport and transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus under field conditions. Can J Vet Res 73:91–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bové JM. 2006. Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J Plant Pathol 88:7–37. doi: 10.4454/jpp.v88i1.828. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hajeri S, Killiny N, El-Mohtar C, Dawson WO, Gowda S. 2014. Citrus tristeza virus-based RNAi in citrus plants induces gene silencing in Diaphorina citri, a phloem-sap sucking insect vector of citrus greening disease (Huanglongbing). J Biotechnol 176:42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Matsumura EE, Nerva L, Nigg JC, Falk BW, Nouri S. 2016. Complete genome sequence of the largest known flavi-like virus, Diaphorina citri flavi-like virus, a novel virus of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Genome Announc 4:e00946-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00946-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nigg JC, Nouri S, Falk BW. 2016. Complete genome sequence of a putative densovirus of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Genome Announc 4:e00589. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00589-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nouri S, Salem N, Nigg JC, Falk BW. 2016. Diverse array of new viral sequences identified in worldwide populations of the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri) using viral metagenomics. J Virol 90:2434–2445. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02793-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Britt K, Gebben S, Levy A, Rwahnih MA, Batuman O. 2020. The detection and surveillance of Asian Citrus Psyllid (Diaphorina citri)—associated viruses in Florida citrus groves. Front Plant Sci 10:1687. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nigg JC, Falk BW. 2020. Diaphorina citri densovirus is a persistently infecting virus with a hybrid genome organization and unique transcription strategy. J Gen Virol 101:226–239. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen YM, Sadiq S, Tian JH, Chen X, Lin XD, Shen JJ, Chen H, Hao ZY, Wille M, Zhou ZC, Wu J, Li F, Wang HW, Yang WD, Xu QY, Wang W, Gao WH, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2022. RNA viromes from terrestrial sites across China expand environmental viral diversity. Nat Microbiol 7:1312–1323. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01180-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Maclot F, Candresse T, Filloux D, Malmstrom CM, Roumagnac R, van der Vlugt R, Massart S. 2020. Illuminating an ecological blackbox: using high throughput sequencing to characterize the plant virome across scales. Front Microbiol 11:578064. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.578064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Amimo JO, El Zowalaty ME, Githae D, Wamalwa M, Djikeng A, Nasrallah GK. 2016. Metagenomic analysis demonstrates the diversity of the fecal virome in asymptomatic pigs in East Africa. Arch Virol 161:887–897. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-2819-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang Q, Xu FZ, An LL, Zhang WH. 2019. Molecular characterization of a new recombinant brassica yellows virus infecting tobacco in China. Virus Genes 55:253–256. doi: 10.1007/s11262-019-01636-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.He C, Zhao X, Fan LJ, Li SF, Wang HQ. 2022. Strawberry, a new natural host of brassica yellows virus in China. Plant Dis 106:1079. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-21-1617-PDN.34546782 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gnanasekaran P, Chakraborty S. 2018. Biology of viral satellites and their role in pathogenesis. Curr Opin Virol 33:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gui X, Liu C, Qi Y, Zhou X. 2022. Geminiviruses employ host DNA glycosylases to subvert DNA methylation-mediated defense. Nat Commun 13:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28262-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jiang GY, Wang C, Song L, Wang X, Zhou YY, Fei CN, Liu H. 2021. Aerosol transmission, an indispensable route of COVID-19 spread: case study of a department-store cluster. Front Environ Sci Eng 15:46. doi: 10.1007/s11783-021-1386-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang B, Tang Z, Cai N, Niu H. 2021b. The characteristics and sources apportionment of water-soluble ions of PM2.5 in suburb Tangshan, China. Urban Clim 35:100742. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ji B, Zhao Y, Esteve-Núñez A, Liu R, Yang Y, Nzihou A, Tai Y, Wei T, Shen C, Yang Y, Ren B, Wang X, Wang Y. 2021. Where do we stand to oversee the coronaviruses in aqueous and aerosol environment? characteristics of transmission and possible curb strategies. Chem Eng J 413:127522. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu L, Zhang J, Sun X, Xu S, Shan M, Yuan Q, Liu L, Du Z, Liu D, Xu D, Song C, Liu B, Lu G, Shi Z, Li W. 2020. Variation in Concentration and Sources of Black Carbon in a Megacity of China During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Geophys Res Lett 47:e2020GL090444. doi: 10.1029/2020GL090444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:789–799. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Campbell RN. 1996. Fungal transmission of plant viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 34:87–108. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xu J, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Trivedi P, Riera N, Wang Y, Liu X, Fan G, Tang J, Coletta-Filho HD, Cubero J, Deng X, Ancona V, Lu Z, Zhong B, Roper MC, Capote N, Catara V, Pietersen G, Vernière C, Al-Sadi AM, Li L, Yang F, Xu X, Wang J, Yang H, Jin T, Wang N. 2018. The structure and function of the global citrus root-associated microbiome. Nat Commun 9:4894. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07343-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hiruma K, Gerlach N, Sacristán S, Nakano RT, Hacquard S, Kracher B, Neumann U, Ramírez D, Bucher M, O’Connell RJ. 2016. Root endophyte Colletotrichum tofieldiae confers plant fitness benefits that are phosphate status dependent. Cell 165:464–474. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zuo DP, He MJ, Chen XR, Hu RJ, Zhao TY, Zhang XY, Peng YM, Wang Y, Li DW, Yu JL, Han CG. 2021. A simple method for the acquisition and transmission of brassica yellows virus from transgenic plants and frozen infected leaves by aphids. Plants 10:1944. doi: 10.20944/preprints202008.0232.v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chen DM, Chen WM, Chen SS. 1993. The succession of the predominant citrus aphids and the control of pesticides. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis 5:42–45. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fujisawa I. 1985. Aphid transmission of turnip mosaic virus and cucumber mosaic virus 2 transmission from virus mixtures. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 51:562–568. doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.51.562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Blackman RL, Eastop VF. 1994. Aphids on the world's trees: an identification and information guide. CAB International. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Owolabi AT, Ekpiken EE. 2014. Transmission efficiency of two strains of Moroccan watermelon mosaic virus by two clones of Aphis spiraecola (Patch). Int J Virol 10:253–262. https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijv.2014.253.262. doi: 10.3923/ijv.2014.253.262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.van Emden HF, Eastop VF, Hughes RD, Way MJ. 1969. The ecology of Myzus persicae. Annu Rev Entomol 14:197–270. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.14.010169.001213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Troncoso AJ, Vargas RR, Tapia DH, Olivares-Donoso R, Niemeyer HM. 2005. Host selection by the generalist aphid Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its subspecies specialized on tobacco, after being reared on the same host. B Entomol Res 95:23–28. doi: 10.1079/BER2004334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pan LL, Chen QF, Guo T, Wang XR, Li P, Wang XW, Liu SS. 2018. Differential efficiency of a begomovirus to cross the midgut of different species of whiteflies results in variation of virus transmission by the vectors. Sci China Life Sci 61:1254–1265. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9283-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mei Y, Wang Y, Hu T, He ZF, Zhou XP. 2021. The C4 protein encoded by tomato leaf curl Yunnan virus interferes with mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade-related defense responses through inhibiting the dissociation of the ERECTA/BKI1 complex. New Phytol 231:747–762. doi: 10.1111/nph.17387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wang MM. 2018. Identification and genetic transformation of citrus MAPK genes and PR genes induced by Huanglongbing. Master’s Thesis, Southwest University, China: (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lennon JT, Lehmkuhl BK. 2016. A trait-based approach to bacterial biofilms in soil. Environ Microbiol 18:2732–2742. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Storey MV, Ashbolt NJ. 2001. Persistence of two model enteric viruses (B40-8 and MS-2 bacteriophages) in water distribution pipe biofilms. Water Sci Technol 43:133–138. . doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nath S, Aron GM, Southard GM, McLean RJC. 2010. Potential for largemouth bass virus to associate with and gain protection from bacterial biofilms. J Aquat Anim Health 22:95–101. doi: 10.1577/H09-046.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ha PT, He R, Killiny N, Brown JK, Omsland A, Gang DR, Beyenal H. 2019. Host-free biofilm culture of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus,” the bacterium associated with Huanglongbing. Biofilm 1:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2019.100005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wang N, Stelinski LL, Pelz-Stelinski KS, Graham JH, Zhang Y. 2017. Tale of the huanglongbing disease pyramid in the context of the citrus microbiome. Phytopathology 107:380–387. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-16-0426-RVW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tian L, Wang L. 2021. Multi-omics analysis reveals structure and function of biofilm microbial communities in a pre-denitrification biofilter. Sci Total Environ 757:143908. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yi WY, Shen JL, Liu GP, Wang J, Yu LF, Li Y, Peis S, Wu JS. 2021. High NH3 deposition in the environs of a commercial fattening pig farm in central south China. Environ Res Lett 16:125007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac3603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wang HC, Feng ZH, Peng L, Li MY. 2011. Influence of environmental factors on the co-aggregation ability of Bacillus megaterium T1 as bridging bacterium. J Ah Agr Sci 39:9791–9792. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.16.128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Meehl GA, Senior CA, Eyring V, Flato G, Lamargue J, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE, Schlund M. 2020. Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models. Sci Adv 6:eaba1981. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yi YC, Shen JL, Yang CD, Wang J, Li Y, Wu JS. 2020. Dry deposition of ammonia around paddy fields in the subtropical hilly area in southern China. Atmos Ocean Sci Lett 13:216–223. doi: 10.1080/16742834.2020.1738208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dwiastuti ME. 2020. Citrus foot rot disease (Phytophthora spp.) control in Indonesia using good agricultural practices efforts green agroindustry. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 484:e012097. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/484/1/012097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rusiñol M, Hundesa A, Cárdenas-Youngs Y, Fernández-Bravo A, Pérez-Cataluña A, Moreno-Mesonero L, Moreno Y, Calvo M, Alonso JL, Figueras MJ, Araujo R, Bofill-Mas S, Girones R. 2020. Microbiological contamination of conventional and reclaimed irrigation water: evaluation and management measures. Sci Total Environ 710:136298. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhao M, Liu R, Wang X, Zhang J, Wang J, Cao B, Zhao Y, Xu L, Chen Y, Zou G. 2022. How do controlled-release fertilizer coated microplastics dynamically affect Cd availability by regulating Fe species and DOC content in soil? Sci Total Environ 850:157886. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lanver D, Tollot M, Schweizer G, Presti LL, Reissmann S, Ma LS, Schuster M, Tanaka S, Liang L, Ludwig N, Kahmann R. 2017. Ustilago maydis effectors and their impact on virulence. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:409–421. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Clark K, Franco JY, Schwizer S, Pang ZQ, Hawara E, Liebrand TWH, Pagliaccia D, Zeng L, Gurung FB, Wang PC, Shi JX, Wang YS, Ancona V, van der Hoorn RAL, Wang N, Coaker G, Ma WB. 2018. An effector from the Huanglongbing-associated pathogen targets citrus proteases. Nat Commun 9:1718. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04140-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Britt K, Gebben S, Levy A, Achor D, Sieburth P, Stevens K, Rwahnih M, Batuman O. 2022. Analysis of citrus tristeza virus incidences within Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri) populations in Florida via high-throughput sequencing. Insects 13:275. doi: 10.3390/insects13030275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Folimonova SY, Robertson CJ, Garnsey SM, Gowda S, Dawson WO. 2009. Examination of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (citrus greening) under different conditions. Phytopathology 99:1346–1354. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-12-1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Fu S, Shao J, Paul C, Zhou C, Hartung JS. 2017. Transcriptional analysis of sweet orange trees co-infected with ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ and mild or severe strains of Citrus tristeza virus. BMC Genomics 18:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4174-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.van Vuuren SP, van der Vyver JB, Luttig M, da Graça JV. 2000. Low incidence of Huanglongbing fruit symptoms in Valencia sweet orange trees in the presence of a population of Citrus tristeza virus. International Organization of Citrus Virologists Conference Proceedings (1957–2010) 14(14): 373–377. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Li WB, Hartung JS, Levy L. 2006. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification of “Candidatus Liberibacter” species associated with citrus Huanglongbing. J Microbiol Methods 66:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompsone DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, Chen Z, Mauceli E, Hacohen N, Gnirke A, Rhind N, di Palma F, Birren BW, Nusbaum C, Lindblad-Toh K, Friedman N, Regev A. 2011. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat Biotechnol 29:644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Menzel P. 2016. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat Commun 7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Tables S1 to S4. Download spectrum.04996-22-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.05 MB (50.2KB, xlsx)
Data Availability Statement
All the RNA samples are deposited in −80°C refrigerator in the College of Natural Resource and Environment of China Agricultural University. And all the raw data and clean data of metatranscriptome sequencing are deposited in the private account of corresponding author of data storage center of College of Advanced Agricultural Science of Zhejiang A&F University. The newly generated viral sequences were deposited in https://github.com/ljmhaha/data.of.ACP.





