Background:
Acupuncture therapy (AT) is a widely used, alternative medicine in China. AT is an effective treatment for many diseases, but its efficacy in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. Therefore, we performed the present meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of AT in stable COPD patients.
Methods:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for AT efficacy in stable COPD patients were searched in literature databases from the inception to December 31, 2021. Pooled effect sizes of outcome measurements with respect to lung function (forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], FEV1 in predicted value [FEV1%], FEV1/FVC), quality of life (St. George respiratory questionnaire [SGRQ]), exercise capacity (6-minute walking distance [6MWD]) and effective rate were estimated by calculating weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI), respectively, by a random-effect model.
Results:
A total of 28 RCTs with 2130 COPD patients were included. AT group had significant improvement in FVC (WMD = 0.29 L, 95% CI: 0.22–0.36, P < .001), FEV1 (WMD = 0.33 L, 95% CI: 0.23–0.43, P < .001), FEV1% (WMD = 3.30%, 95% CI: 3.30–4.64, P < .001), FEV1/FVC (WMD = 5.45%, 95% CI: 4.41–6.49, P < .001), 6MWD (WMD = 45.48 m, 95% CI: 28.21–62.16, P < .001), SGRQ (WMD = −7.79, 95% CI: −12.34 to −3.24, P < .001), and a higher effective rate (OR = 3.71, 95% CI: 2.50–5.52, P < .001) compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis stratified by comparison model (AT combined with other treatments vs other treatments, AT alone vs sham AT) and treatment duration (≥8 weeks, <8 weeks) also showed more improvement in AT arm than control arm without significant between-subgroup difference. Adverse events were reported in a few studies and only mild reactions were observed.
Conclusion:
AT is effective in improving lung function, quality of life and exercise capacity, and can be used as an adjunctive treatment in patients with stable COPD.
Keywords: acupuncture therapy, COPD, lung function, meta-analysis, quality of life
1. Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, progressive disease characterized by irreversible airflow limitation, airway inflammation and gradual loss of lung function.[1] COPD is a major global health issue causing more than 3 million deaths in 2015 and is estimated to be the third major cause of global mortality in 2030.[2,3] With the growing number of smokers and the elderly, COPD becomes more and more prevalent, which is estimated to cause 4.5 million COPD-related deaths in 2030 and 5.4 million deaths in 2060.[2,4] In China, national cross-sectional surveys demonstrated a significant increase of COPD prevalence in people aged 40 or above from 8.2% in 2002 to over 13% in 2015, indicating an urgent need for prevention and treatment of COPD.[5–7]
COPD patients are experiencing persistent respiratory symptoms and airway limitation, and may also suffer repeated respiratory infection, frequent acute exacerbation and hospitalization, which adds an additional burden to the society and medical system.[8] Pharmacological interventions, mainly bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory drugs, have been proven to be efficient in relieving COPD symptoms, improving quality of life and exercise capacity, and reducing risk of exacerbation and hospitalization.[9,10] However, alternative and more effective treatments are still in need to achieve a better management of COPD symptoms and prevention of COPD progression.[11]
Acupuncture therapy (AT) is a widely used, alternative medicine in China for a variety of diseases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved that AT was effective in the treatment of migraine,[12] chronic knee pain,[13] reflex sympathetic dystrophy after stroke,[14] nocturnal enuresis[15] and Alzheimer disease,[16] although the mechanism was not fully elucidated. Recent trials suggested a promising efficacy of AT in COPD patients by reducing dyspnea and improving quality of life and exercise capacity.[17–19] However, the efficacy of AT in improving lung function, quality of life and exercise capacity for stable COPD patients was still in controversy. The inconsistency may be caused by the small sample size of study arms and the difference in comparators of RCTs. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of AT in patients with stable COPD by incorporating current evidence from RCTs.
2. Methods
2.1. Literature search and study selection
We performed the present meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.[20] English literature databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov, and Chinese databases comprising Wanfang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, were searched for eligible studies from the inception to December 31, 2021. The following keywords were used for search: “acupuncture” AND (“chronic obstructive pulmonary disease” OR “COPD”). Only English and Chinese articles were considered. We identified additional studies by manually searching the reference lists of included studies. Since this was a meta-analysis synthesizing published data, ethical approval and patient consent were not necessary.
All eligible studies fulfilled the following criteria: patients were clinically diagnosed with stable COPD; studies were randomized, controlled trials; studies compared AT vs sham AT, or AT combined with other treatments (Western medicine [WM], traditional Chinese medicine [TCM], or pulmonary rehabilitation [PR]) with other treatments; studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: pulmonary function, exercise capacity, quality of life, effective rate. AT included needling acupuncture, electroacupuncture, warm acupuncture and auricular acupuncture, and noninvasive moxibustion and acupressure should be excluded. Case series, review, meta-analysis, studies without sufficient data and studies comparing AT alone with other therapies were also discarded. For duplicated studies, only the most recent one was included.
2.2. Outcome measurements
Pulmonary functions included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the percentage of FEV1 in predicted value (FEV1%) and in FVC (FEV1/FVC). The exercise capacity was assessed by 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and quality of life by St. George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). The criteria for effective rate was based on the Criteria of Diagnosis and Therapeutic Effect of Disease and Syndromes in Traditional Chinese Medicine.[21]
2.3. Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias
We extracted the following information from each study: first author, year of publication, interventions, sample size, mean age, average disease duration, percentage of male, acupoints, treatment duration, outcome measurements, the mean change from baseline and corresponding standard deviation (SD) of each outcome in both groups. If the change value was not directly provided, then we calculated it as follows: Change MEAN = Post-treatment MEAN − Baseline MEAN. The corresponding SD was estimated as follows: Change SD = SQRT (Post-treatment SD2 + Baseline SD2 − 2R × Post-treatment SD × Baseline SD). Usually, we used 0.5 for R.
Risk of bias of each study was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias for randomized trials.[22] This tool assessed the risk of bias of random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting and other bias. The risk of bias was considered as low, high, or unclear.
Two independent investigators reviewed the abstracts and full texts of all studies to obtain eligible studies, extracted the information and assessed the risk of bias of each study. A third investigator made final decisions when discrepancies occurred.
2.4. Statistical analysis
Between-study heterogeneity was assessed by I2, and I2 < 25%, 25% to 50% or more than 50% indicated small, moderate or large heterogeneity, respectively. We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous variables, or pooled odds ratio (OR) and the 95% CI for dichotomous variables. The random-effect DerSimonian-Laird model by was applied for all analyses to gain more conservative estimates than using the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis regarding comparison (AT + Other treatments vs Other treatments, AT vs Sham AT) and treatment duration (≥8 weeks, <8 weeks) was conducted. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess whether a single study obviously affected the pooled estimates or not. Meta-regression analyses for publication year, percentage of male, mean age, sample size and treatment duration were also performed when there were 10 or more eligible studies. Funnel plot and Egger test were used for the assessment of publication bias. All analyses were conducted by using STATA 16.0 (StataCorp LP, TX). P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Description of eligible studies included in meta-analysis
The literature search yielded a total of 517 studies (Fig. 1). We discarded 413 obviously irrelevant studies after reviewing the titles and abstracts. Among the 104 remaining studies, 6 used duplicated samples, 42 recruited patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, 25 investigated the combined effect of AT and TCM, and 3 compared AT alone with WM. Finally, 28 RCTs with 2130 stable COPD patients were eligible for our meta-analysis.[17–19,23–47] Five studies were published in English language[17–19,24,31] and the others were in Chinese language. The sample size of each study ranged between 30 and 150. Six studies compared AT to sham AT,[17,18,23,28,29,34] and the others compared AT + other treatments to other treatments. The characteristics of all eligible studies are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of literature search.
Table 1.
Characteristics of all studies included in meta-analysis.
| Author | Year | Intervention | Sample size | Mean age, yr | Duration | Outcome measurement | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | Treatment | Control | Treatment | Control | ||||
| Jia J | 2004 | AT + PR + WM | PR + WM | 22 | 22 | 61.0 | 61.0 | 100 d | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
| Wan WR | 2009 | AT + TCM | TCM | 75 | 75 | 62.4 | 61.8 | 36 d | FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
| Yang P | 2009 | AT + PR | PR | 40 | 40 | NR | NR | 40 d | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD |
| Deering BM | 2011 | AT + PR | PR | 16 | 25 | 65.1 | 67.7 | 8 w | FEV1%, SGRQ |
| Gao J | 2011 | AT | WM | 30 | 30 | 64.87 | 65.25 | 8 w | FEV1, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, SGRQ |
| Suzuki M | 2012 | AT | Sham AT | 34 | 34 | 72.7 | 72.5 | 12 w | FVC, FEV1, FEV1%, 6MWD, SGRQ |
| Guo YM | 2013 | AT | Sham AT | 18 | 15 | 65.28 | 66.6 | 6 w | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD, |
| Tong J | 2014 | AT | Sham AT | 16 | 14 | 64 | 67 | 5 w | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD, SGRQ |
| Chu EX | 2015 | AT + WM + TCM | WM + TCM | 32 | 32 | NR | NR | 3 m | FEV1, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
| Liu LJ | 2015 | AT + WM | WM | 40 | 40 | 58.3 | 63.2 | 3 m | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD, effective rate |
| Deng CH | 2016 | AT + WM | WM | 22 | 22 | 57.1 | 58.5 | 24 w | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD |
| Feng JF | 2016 | AT | Sham AT | 36 | 36 | 67.8 | 67.1 | 8 w | FVC, FEV1%, 6MWD, SGRQ |
| Li XY | 2016 | AT + WM + TCM | WM + TCM | 30 | 30 | NR | NR | 3 w | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
| Ge Y | 2017 | AT | Sham AT | 24 | 20 | 65 | 65 | 14 sessions | 6MWD, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC |
| Wang Z | 2017 | AT + WM | WM | 50 | 50 | NR | NR | 6 m | 6MWD, SGRQ |
| Chen NH | 2018 | AT + WM | WM | 47 | 47 | 59.83 | 60.29 | 8 m | FVC, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, SGRQ, effective rate |
| Shi GC | 2018 | AT + WM + TCM | WM + TCM | 40 | 40 | 56.2 | 58.1 | 24 w | FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC |
| Zhong GJ | 2018 | AT + WM | WM | 30 | 30 | 50 | 52 | 7 d | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC |
| Deng YQ | 2019 | AT + WM | WM | 43 | 43 | 64.28 | 64.96 | 4 w | FEV1, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD |
| Lv ZJ | 2019 | AT + TCM | TCM | 40 | 40 | 64.36 | 64.23 | 8 w | FEV1, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
| Yu G | 2019 | AT + WM | WM | 56 | 56 | 58.46 | 57.23 | 3 m | FEV1%, FEV1/FVC |
| Zhou Y | 2019 | AT + WM | WM | 44 | 44 | 65.84 | 65.38 | 3 m | FEV1%, 6MWD |
| Li Y | 2019 | AT + WM | WM | 45 | 46 | 65.9 | 67.0 | 6 w | FEV1, FEV1%, 6MWD |
| Li D | 2020 | AT + WM | WM | 40 | 40 | 60.53 | 61.15 | 5 m | FVC, FEV1, 6MWD, SGRQ, effective rate |
| He Y | 2021 | AT | Sham AT | 30 | 26 | 65 | 65 | 4.6 w | FEV1, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD |
| Shi ZW | 2021 | AT + WM | WM | 49 | 48 | 64.96 | 65.11 | 8 w | FEV1, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD, effective rate |
| Wang TT | 2021 | AT + TCM | TCM | 58 | 58 | 58 | 59 | 2 m | FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
| Wang X | 2021 | AT + WM | WM | 41 | 41 | 51.89 | 52.21 | 50 d | FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
| Zhang P | 2021 | AT + WM | WM | 50 | 50 | 70.22 | 70.29 | 2 w | FEV1, FEV1/FVC, effective rate |
6MWD = 6-minute walking distance, AT = acupuncture treatment, d = days, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity, m = months, NR = not reported, PR = pulmonary rehabilitation, SGRQ = St. George respiratory questionnaire, TCM = traditional Chinese medicine, w = weeks, WM = western medicine.
Seventeen studies reported adequate method of randomization. Only 4 reported proper method of allocation concealment.[17,23,29,33] Blinding of participants and personnel were achieved in 5 studies which used sham acupuncture as control.[17,18,23,28,29,34] Therefore, the majority of studies had high risk of performance bias. Six studies reported blinding of outcome assessment and thus had low risk of detection bias.[17–19,23,24,29] All studies reported a small number of or no dropouts, and then low risk of attrition bias was assigned. There was no evidence of selective reporting in 3 studies[17–19] as they were in accordance with their registered protocols while the others were rated as unclear risk of bias. However, we did not have adequate information for the judgement of other bias. The assessment of risk of bias is shown in Table 2. In summary, the methodological quality of studies comparing AT versus Sham AT was high, and that of the other studies was poor.
Table 2.
Assessment of risk of bias using Cochrane collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias for randomized trials.
| Study | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and personnel | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jia J (2004) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Wan WR (2009) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Yang P (2009) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Deering BM (2011) | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low | Low | Unclear |
| Suzuki M (2012) | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear |
| Guo YM (2013) | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Tong J (2014) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Chu EX (2015) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Liu LJ (2015) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Deng CH (2016) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Feng JF (2016) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear |
| Li XY (2016) | Low | Low | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Ge Y (2017) | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Wang Z (2017) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Chen NH (2018) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Shi GC (2018) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Zhong GJ (2018) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Deng YQ (2019) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Li Y (2019) | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Lv ZJ (2019) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Yu G (2019) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Zhou Y (2019) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Li D (2020) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| He Y (2021) | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Shi ZW (2021) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Wang TT (2021) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Wang X (2021) | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
| Zhang P (2021) | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear |
3.2. FVC
A total of 8 studies with 742 COPD patients analyzed the efficacy of AT in improving FVC. There was large heterogeneity (I2 = 67.4%, P < .003). We observed a significantly larger FVC improvement in AT group than the control group (WMD = 0.29 L, 95% CI: 0.22–0.36, P < .001, Fig. 2). The exclusion of Li D study[43] significantly reduced heterogeneity to 10.1% (WMD = 0.26 L, 95% CI: 0.22–0.29). Subgroup analysis showed that AT combined with other treatments improved FVC more than other treatments (WMD = 0.32 L, 95% CI: 0.20–0.44, Fig. 2), and that AT alone showed more FVC improvement than sham AT (WMD = 0.26 L, 95% CI: 0.21–0.30, P < .001, Fig. 2). There was no significant difference between both subgroups (P = .340). We also found significantly FVC improvement in subgroups of treatment duration <8 weeks (WMD = 0.21 L, 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.42) and ≥8 weeks (WMD = 0.30 L, 95% CI: 0.22–0.38).
Figure 2.
Meta-analysis of AT in improving FVC of stable COPD patients. AT = acupuncture therapy, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FVC = forced vital capacity.
3.3. FEV1
We included 12 eligible studies comprising 1094 participants in the meta-analysis of FEV1. Eleven out of 12 studies compared AT + other treatments to other treatments and only 1 compared AT to sham AT. We found AT group had more FEV1 improvement than control group (WMD = 0.33 L, 95% CI: 0.23–0.43, P < .001, Fig. 3). Divided by treatment duration, both short-term (WMD = 0.25 L, 95% CI: 0.18–0.33) and long-term (WMD = 0.38 L, 95% CI: 0.21–0.56) treatment could significantly improve FEV1 of COPD patients, and there was no significant between-subgroup difference (P = .179).
Figure 3.
Meta-analysis of AT in improving FEV1 of stable COPD patients. AT = acupuncture therapy, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
3.4. FEV1%
The meta-analysis of FEV1% included 1256 patients from 19 eligible studies. There was small between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 11.6%, P = .313). Overall, FEV1% improved more in the AT group compared with the control group (WMD = 3.30%, 95% CI: 3.30–4.64, P < .001, Fig. 4). The subgroup of “AT + Other treatments vs Other treatments” included 13 low-quality RCTs and had moderate between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 38.1%). Compared with other treatments, AT combined with other treatments could significantly improve FEV1% (WMD = 3.83%, 95% CI: 2.88–4.77, Fig. 4). Six high-quality RCTs compared AT alone to sham AT and had no between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0), which showed better FEV1% improvement in AT group than sham AT group (WMD = 4.38%, 95% CI: 2.99–5.77, Fig. 4). We also found no heterogeneity in long-term treatment subgroup, and both short-term (WMD = 4.29%, 95% CI: 2.38–6.20) and long-term (WMD = 4.02%, 95% CI: 3.35–4.70) treatment could improve FEV1% with no significant between-subgroup difference.
Figure 4.
Meta-analysis of AT in improving FEV1% of stable COPD patients. AT = acupuncture therapy, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
3.5. FEV1/FVC
The FEV1/FVC outcome was reported in 21 studies with 1592 cases. Patients in the AT group exhibited significant FEV1/FVC improvement compared with those in the control group (WMD = 5.45%, 95% CI: 4.41–6.49, P < .001, Fig. 5). The between-study heterogeneity was obvious (I2 = 63.5%). However, if we excluded 2 outlier studies from Lv ZJ and Yu G,[41,42] there was no heterogeneity anymore (I2 = 0), and the WMD decreased slightly to 5.06% (95% CI: 4.46–5.65, P < .001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated FEV1/FVC improvement in AT combined with other treatments prior to other treatments with substantial heterogeneity (WMD = 5.47%, 95% CI: 4.33–6.61, I2 = 70.6%, Fig. 5), and in AT alone prior to sham AT with no heterogeneity (WMD = 5.52%, 95% CI: 2.46–8.58, I2 = 0, Fig. 5). Both short-term (WMD = 6.12%, 95% CI: 5.01–7.23) and long-term (WMD = 5.13%, 95% CI: 3.65–6.60) treatment resulted in significant FEV1/FVC improvement.
Figure 5.
Meta-analysis of AT in improving FEV1/FVC of stable COPD patients. AT = acupuncture therapy, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity.
3.6. 6MWD
Exercise capacity was reported in 14 studies that included 896 COPD patients. A larger 6MWD improvement was found in AT group than the control group by meta-analysis (WMD = 45.48 m, 95% CI: 28.21–62.16, P < .001, Fig. 6). However, there was substantial heterogeneity in the overall group and any subgroup. There was no significant between-subgroup difference when divided by comparison model (Fig. 6) or treatment duration.
Figure 6.
Meta-analysis of AT in improving 6MWD of stable COPD patients. 6MWD = 6-minute walking distance, AT = acupuncture therapy, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
3.7. SGRQ
Seven studies with 485 participants used SGRQ score to assess the quality of life. There was substantial between-study heterogeneity. Meta-analysis demonstrated that AT had better performance in improving quality of life than control (WMD = −7.79, 95% CI: −12.34 to −3.24, P < .001, Fig. 7).
Figure 7.
Meta-analysis of AT in improving SGRQ of stable COPD patients. AT = acupuncture therapy, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SGRQ = St. George respiratory questionnaire.
3.8. Effective rate
Meta-analysis of 12 studies with 1047 participants demonstrated that the addition of AT to other treatments improved the effective rate compared with other treatments (OR = 3.71, 95% CI: 2.50–5.52, P < .001, I2 = 0, Fig. 8).
Figure 8.
Meta-analysis of effective rate of AT in treating stable COPD patients. AT = acupuncture therapy, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
3.9. Safety
Only 4 studies provided information of adverse events.[18,24,30,33] Suzuki et al reported minor reactions, including fatigue, subcutaneous hemorrhage, dizziness and needle site pain, in some patients who all recovered in a short time.[18] All of 4 studies reported no serious adverse events.
3.10. Sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias
Sensitivity analysis showed that none of a single study had obvious influence on the pooled results. Meta-regression demonstrated that moderators, including publication year, percentage of male, mean age, sample size and treatment duration, did not significantly affect the FEV1, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC or 6MWD (Table 3). The funnel plots of all meta-analyses were symmetrical, and Egger test suggested no obvious evidence of publication bias (Table 4).
Table 3.
Results of meta-regression analysis.
| Moderator | Co-efficient | Standard error | t | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEV1 | ||||
| Publication yearr | 0.005 | 0.139 | 0.37 | .708 |
| Percentage of male | −0.650 | 0.463 | −1.40 | .160 |
| Mean age | −0.011 | 0.009 | −1.20 | .229 |
| Sample size | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.44 | .660 |
| Treatment duration | 0.003 | 0.010 | 0.32 | .752 |
| FEV1% | ||||
| Publication year | −0.052 | 0.137 | −0.38 | .705 |
| Percent of male | 1.014 | 2.566 | 0.40 | .693 |
| Mean age | −0.112 | 0.065 | −1.71 | .087 |
| Sample size | 0.005 | 0.016 | 0.30 | .761 |
| Treatment duration | −0.083 | 0.056 | −1.49 | .137 |
| FEV1/FVC | ||||
| Publication year | −0.003 | 0.132 | −0.03 | .980 |
| Percent of male | 0.057 | 4.483 | 0.01 | .990 |
| Mean age | 0.115 | 0.120 | 0.96 | .337 |
| Sample size | −0.013 | 0.018 | −0.74 | .457 |
| Treatment duration | −0.118 | 0.075 | −1.57 | .117 |
| 6MWD | ||||
| Publication year | 0.469 | 2.779 | 0.17 | .866 |
| Percent of male | 59.07 | 46.63 | 1.27 | .205 |
| Mean age | 1.288 | 2.190 | 0.59 | .556 |
| Sample size | 0.206 | 0.396 | 0.52 | .604 |
| Treatment duration | 0.961 | 1.346 | 0.71 | .475 |
6MWD = 6-minute walking distance, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity.
Table 4.
Egger test for publication bias.
| Outcome | z value | P value |
|---|---|---|
| FVC | 1.64 | .102 |
| FEV1 | 1.41 | .159 |
| FEV1% | 0.45 | .656 |
| FEV1/FVC | 0.98 | .327 |
| 6MWD | 0.29 | .774 |
| SGRQ | 1.46 | .143 |
| Effective rate | 0.43 | .667 |
6MWD = 6-minute walking distance, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity, SGRQ = St. George respiratory questionnaire.
4. Discussion
In the current meta-analysis with evidence from 28 RCTs that included 2130 patients, we found that AT, a popular alternative medicine in China, alone or combined with other treatments could significantly improve lung function, quality of life and exercise capacity of COPD patients. The mean differences of FEV1, 6MWD and SGRQ were 0.33 L, 45.48 m, and −7.79, respectively, which were significantly larger than the minimal clinical important differences of 100 mL, 26 m and 4 points,[48–50] suggesting the improvements by AT were huge.
Despite better efficacy of AT than control, there was substantial heterogeneity and high risk of bias, which may weaken the interpretation of the results of meta-analysis. Most of included studies investigated the efficacy of AT as an adjunctive treatment by comparing AT added to the other treatment (PR, WM, TCM) to other treatment alone. These studies were included in the subgroup “AT + Other treatments vs Other treatments.” Meta-analysis showed that the AT arm of this subgroup had more improvements in FEV1, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, 6WMD, SGRQ, and higher effective rate than the control arm. These results indicated that the efficacy of conventional treatments of stable COPD could be furtherly improved by adding AT. In clinical practice, AT could be used as an adjunctive treatment to conventional treatments of stable COPD. However, there was substantial between-study heterogeneity in this subgroup as indicated by I2 statistic. Moreover, the risk of bias of these studies is high according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias for randomized trials. All these studies had high risk of performance bias, since they did not used placebo AT as control and the randomization was not blinding to participants.
On the contrary, the subgroup “AT vs Sham AT” included 6 sham-controlled RCTs that had low risk of bias according to quality assessment. Subgroup analysis showed there was no between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0) in lung function in terms of FVC, FEV1% and FEV1/FVC, indicating that these trials were in homogeneity. Meta-analysis demonstrated that AT alone could significantly improve lung function in stable COPD compared with placebo AT, which might reflect the real efficacy of AT.
Between-subgroup comparison analysis showed no significant difference between subgroups stratified by comparison model (AT combined with other treatments vs other treatments, AT alone vs sham AT) and treatment duration (≥8 weeks, <8 weeks). A previous network meta-analysis in migraine prophylaxis demonstrated a higher proportion of responders in sham-acupuncture subgroup than oral pharmacological placebo subgroup, suggesting a nonspecific effect of acupuncture.[51] Thus, the overall effect in the subgroup of AT combined with other treatments which were not sham-controlled trials may be over-estimated.
Although AT may be effective, the mechanism remains largely unclear. It was reported that acupuncture may have modulation effects on immune system by reducing the release of inflammation factors and balancing the pro-inflammation and anti-inflammation cytokines.[52] The concentrations of inflammation markers, including IL-6, IL-8, and TNFα, were consistently higher in COPD patients than in the healthy controls.[53] In a randomized controlled study, acupuncture treatment in asthma patients was found to reduce IL-6 level significantly while the control group had no change.[54] Another study in COPD patients showed that IL-6 and TNFα levels were significantly decreased in acupuncture group than in the placebo needling group.[55] These data supported an immune-modulating effect of acupuncture and may partially explain its therapeutic mechanism. Meanwhile, another study showed that electroacupuncture may attenuate the pulmonary vascular remodeling through VEFR/PI3K/Akt pathway in COPD rat model.[56] More studies are needed to elucidate the concise mechanism of AT.
Several meta-analyses of AT treatment for COPD have been previously performed.[57–61] However, our study has some differences and advantages over them. Our study has the largest sample size (28 trials, 2130 participants), thus improving the statistical power. We performed several subgroup analyses, including AT versus Sham AT, AT + Other treatments versus Other treatments, long-term duration (≥8 weeks) and short-term duration (<8 weeks) to comprehensively show the treatment effect of AT. Our study only focused on the treatment effect of AT on stable COPD and has excluded noninvasive moxibustion and acupressure and exacerbated COPD to keep the homogeneity of included studies.
Some limitations should also be noted. Firstly, the majority of included studies had poor quality since a high risk of bias, especially in the aspect of blinding and randomization, was found. Secondly, there was high between-study heterogeneity in most of the comparisons. The heterogeneity of FVC and FEV1/FVC could be significantly reduced by excluding outliers, but the source of heterogeneity of 6MWD and SGRQ has not been determined. Thus, the interpretation of these results should be in caution. Thirdly, adverse events were only reported in a few studies and the safety needs further confirmation in the future. Fourthly, the long-term effect of AT, for example, the prevention of acute exacerbation, were seldom investigated.
5. Conclusions
Our study demonstrated that AT is effective in improving lung function, quality of life and exercise capacity, and can be effectively used as an adjunctive treatment in stable COPD. More large-scale, well-designed, long-term follow-up RCTs are needed in the future.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Su Fan, Qinglin Wang.
Data curation: Su Fan, Zhenyu Zhang.
Formal analysis: Su Fan, Zhenyu Zhang, Qinglin Wang.
Supervision: Qinglin Wang.
Writing – original draft: Su Fan.
Writing – review & editing: Su Fan, Zhenyu Zhang, Qinglin Wang.
Abbreviations:
- 6MWD
- 6-minute walking distance
- AT
- acupuncture therapy
- CI
- confidence interval
- COPD
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- FEV1 =
- forced expiratory volume in 1 second
- FVC
- forced vital capacity
- OR
- odds ratio
- PR
- pulmonary rehabilitation
- RCTs
- randomized controlled trials
- SD
- standard deviation
- SGRQ
- St. George respiratory questionnaire
- TCM
- traditional Chinese medicine
- WM
- Western medicine
- WMD
- weighted mean difference
This work was supported by Beijing Health Promotion Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine and a part of the Excellent Team for Standardized Training of Traditional Chinese Medicine Residents of Beijing.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
How to cite this article: Fan S, Zhang Z, Wang Q. Efficacy of acupuncture therapy for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2023;102:15(e33537).
Contributor Information
Su Fan, Email: sue57570@163.com.
Zhenyu Zhang, Email: zzytuina@163.com.
References
- [1].Vestbo J. COPD: definition and phenotypes. Clin Chest Med. 2014;35:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Singh D, Agusti A, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur Respir J. 2019;53:1900164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1459–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Lopez AD, Shibuya K, Rao C, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current burden and future projections. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:397–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Fang L, Gao P, Bao H, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a nationwide prevalence study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:421–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Wang C, Xu J, Yang L, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China (the China Pulmonary Health [CPH] study): a national cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2018;391:1706–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Zhong N, Wang C, Yao W, et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a large, population-based survey. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:753–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Lopez-Campos JL, Tan W, Soriano JB. Global burden of COPD. Respirology. 2016;21:14–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Geake JB, Dabscheck EJ, Wood-Baker R, et al. Indacaterol, a once-daily beta2-agonist, versus twice-daily beta(2)-agonists or placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kew KM, Mavergames C, Walters JA. Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD010177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Cazzola M, Rogliani P, Ora J, et al. Treatment options for moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17:977–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Yang Y, Que Q, Ye X, et al. Verum versus sham manual acupuncture for migraine: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Acupunct Med. 2016;34:76–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Zhang Q, Yue J, Golianu B, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture for chronic knee pain. Acupunct Med. 2017;35:392–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Wei X, He L, Liu J, et al. Electroacupuncture for reflex sympathetic dystrophy after stroke: a meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28:1388–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Lv ZT, Song W, Wu J, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture in children with nocturnal enuresis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:320701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Zhou J, Peng W, Xu M, et al. The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for patients with Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltim). 2015;94:e933e933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Feng J, Wang X, Li X, et al. Acupuncture for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Medicine (Baltim). 2016;95:e4879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Suzuki M, Muro S, Ando Y, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of acupuncture in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): the COPD-acupuncture trial (CAT). Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:878–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Deering BM, Fullen B, Egan C, et al. Acupuncture as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31:392–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].The State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Criteria of Diagnosis and Therapeutic Effects of Diseases and Syndromes in Traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing: China Medical Science Press. 2002; 54–8. [Google Scholar]
- [22].Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane. 2022. Available at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. [Google Scholar]
- [23].He Y, Li GY, Zheng ZG, et al. Effect of electroacupuncture on small airway function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021;41:861–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Li Y, Xiong C, Zeng Y, et al. Acupuncture treatment of lung-spleen Qi deficiency in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med. 2019;39:885–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Jia J. Clinical study on acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training for improvement of pulmonary function in the patient of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2004;23:681–3. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Wan WR, Chen SL, Zhang W, et al. Clinical study on effect of lung function of patients with COPD in remission stage treated by acupuncture and moxibustion combining with Chinese herbs for warming kidney-yang and regulating qi. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med. 2009;27:163–5. [Google Scholar]
- [27].Yang P, Zhang YL, Peng M. Effect of Pei Tu Sheng Jin acupuncture method on quality of life in patients with COPD. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med. 2009;11:149–50. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Guo YM, Tong J, Yao H. Effect of acupuncture on respiratory function of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Guangzhou Univ Tradit Chin Med. 2013;30:658–63. [Google Scholar]
- [29].Tong J, Guo YM, He Y, et al. Regulatory effects of acupuncture on exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at stable phase: a randomized controlled trial. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2014;34:846–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Chu EX, Cai SC. Observation the efficacy of acupuncture combined with western medicine for the treatment of stable phase of chronic obstructive lung disease. Clin J Tradit Chin Med. 2015;27:82–4. [Google Scholar]
- [31].Liu LJ, Shi MY, Song XM, et al. Clinical effect observation on acupuncture for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Acupunct Tuina Sci. 2015;13:306–11. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Deng CH, Zhang DT, Wang NW. Application of abdominal acupuncture in treating 22 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Yunnan J Tradit Chin Med Mater Med. 2016;37:73–4. [Google Scholar]
- [33].Li XY, Peng L, Cao JZ, et al. Effect of acupuncture combined with medicine on patients with moderate/severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Contin Med Educ. 2016;30:158–60. [Google Scholar]
- [34].Ge Y, Yao H, Tong J, et al. Effects of acupuncture on peripheral skeletal muscle exercise ability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at stable phase. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017;37:366–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Wang Z, Chen YH, Xie Y. Effect of acupuncture for rehabilitation treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Nurs Res. 2017;31:969–70. [Google Scholar]
- [36].Chen NH. The clinical effect of acupuncture on lung function and health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at stable phase. Hebei J Tradit Chin Med. 2018;40:434–7. [Google Scholar]
- [37].Shi GC, Wang KS, Zhou Y, et al. The impact of electroacupuncture combined with Astragalus injection in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Chongqing Med. 2018;47:2992–4. [Google Scholar]
- [38].Zhong GJ. Clinical observation on Bo’s abdominal acupuncture for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease of deficiency of kidney failing to grasp qi type. J New Chin Med. 2018;50:190–2. [Google Scholar]
- [39].Zhou Y, Shao WT. The influence of warming needle moxibustion combined with auricular acupuncture on the cardio-pulmonary function and blood oxygen saturation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Yunnan Univ Tradit Chin Med. 2018;41:69–71. [Google Scholar]
- [40].Deng YQ, Lei XL, Chen Y. Influence of acupuncture on exercise capacity and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Inner Mongolia J Tradit Chin Med. 2019;38:70–1. [Google Scholar]
- [41].Lv ZJ. Clinical study on linggui zhugan decoction combined with wenyang tongluo method acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Guangming J Chin Med. 2019;34:2115–7. [Google Scholar]
- [42].Yu G. Clinical observation on shice jingluo acupuncture for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Community Doctors. 2019;35:118–9. [Google Scholar]
- [43].Li D, Liu GY. The value of acupuncture combined with tiotropium bromide in preventing acute exacerbation of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Public Health Eng. 2020;19:636–8. [Google Scholar]
- [44].Shi ZW, Ni TT, Wang XB. Clinical study on warming-needle moxibustion combined with salmeterol xinafoate and fluticasone propionate powder for inhalation for COPD in stable stage. J New Chin Med. 2021;53:150–3. [Google Scholar]
- [45].Wang TT, Zhou LZ, Ren T, et al. Efficacy observation of electroacupuncture combined with Corbrin capsules for remission-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its effects on serum PTX3, 5-HT and NF-κB. Shanghai J Acu-mox. 2021;40:820–4. [Google Scholar]
- [46].Wang X, Wang H. Effect of Peitu Shengjin acupuncture therapy on lung function and blood oxygen saturation in patients with COPD. J Clin Acupunct. 2021;37:27–31. [Google Scholar]
- [47].Zhang P, Li ZY. Observation on curative effect of warming acupuncture combined with western medicine ultrasonic atomization in the treatment of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at stable stage. Reflexol Rehabil Med. 2021;2:30–3. [Google Scholar]
- [48].Puhan MA, Chandra D, Mosenifar Z, et al. The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:784–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Jones PW. St. George’s respiratory questionnaire: MCID. COPD. 2005;2:75–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Donohue JF. Minimal clinically important differences in COPD lung function. COPD. 2005;2:111–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Meissner K, Fassler M, Rucker G, et al. Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1941–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Zijlstra FJ, van den Berg-de Lange I, Huygen FJ, et al. Anti-inflammatory actions of acupuncture. Mediators Inflamm. 2003;12:59–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Gorska K, Nejman-Gryz P, Paplinska-Goryca M, et al. Comparative study of IL-33 and IL-6 levels in different respiratory samples in mild-to-moderate asthma and COPD. COPD. 2018;15:36–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Joos S, Schott C, Zou H, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of acupuncture in the treatment of allergic asthma: a randomized controlled study. J Altern Complement Med. 2000;6:519–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Suzuki M, Muro S, Fukui M, et al. Effects of acupuncture on nutritional state of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): re-analysis of COPD acupuncture trial, a randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Zhang L, Tian Y, Zhao P, et al. Electroacupuncture attenuates pulmonary vascular remodeling in a rat model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease via the VEGF/PI3K/Akt pathway. Acupunct Med. 2022;40:9645284221078873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Fernández-Jané C, Vilaró J, Fei Y, et al. Acupuncture techniques for COPD: a systematic review. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020;20:138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Liu Q, Duan H, Lian A, et al. Rehabilitation effects of acupuncture on the diaphragm dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:2023–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Fernández-Jané C, Vilaró J, Fei Y, et al. Filiform needle acupuncture for copd: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2019;47:102182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Wang J, Li J, Yu X, et al. Acupuncture therapy for functional effects and quality of life in COPD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3026726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Coyle ME, Shergis JL, Huang ET, et al. Acupuncture therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Altern Ther Health Med. 2014;20:10–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








