Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284414

Predictors and incidence of depression and anxiety in women undergoing infertility treatment: A cross-sectional study

Lingyan Wang 1,#, Youyin Tang 2,#, Yuyang Wang 1,*
Editor: Jacopo Di Giuseppe3
PMCID: PMC10101516  PMID: 37053254

Abstract

The global incidence of infertility is increasing year by year, and the association between infertility and mental illness has been widely concerned. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of anxiety and depression in infertile women in China and explore the risk factors which might lead to anxiety and depression. From January 2020 to December 2020, female infertile patients who received assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment at West China Second Hospital were recruited and a total of 1712 eligible female patients were finally enrolled in this study. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used to evaluate the patients’ psychological status. The reliability of all scales was evaluated by Cronbach’s α and Spearman-Brown half coefficient, and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value was calculated by factor analysis to evaluate validity. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were applied for assessing independent risk factors of anxiety and depression, respectively. The incidence of anxiety and depression in infertile women were 25.2% and 31.3%, respectively. Cronbach’s α coefficients and Spearman-Brown half-fold coefficients of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 were 0.870, 0.825, 0.852 and 0.793, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that education level (junior college degree or above, OR:1. 6, 95% CI: 1.2–2.1, P = 0.003), somatic symptoms (severe somatic symptoms, OR:15.2, 95%CI: 5.6–41.3, P<0.001), sleep quality (poor sleep quality, OR:9.3, 95% CI:4.7–18.4, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for anxiety. And age>35 years old, moderate and severe somatic symptoms and poor sleep quality were independent risk factors for depression. Somatic symptoms and poor sleep quality are both the risk factors of anxiety and depression symptoms of infertile woman. And high educated (junior college degree or above) patients are more likely to be complicated with anxiety symptoms, while elderly patients (age>35) are prone to be complicated with depression symptoms.

Introduction

Infertility is a disease of reproductive system, which is defined as the failure to conceive despite 12 months of unprotected intercourse [1]. Studies have revealed that environmental pollution, food safety, alcoholism, smoking, endocrine dysfunction, abnormal immune function, delayed childbearing age and other factors will contribute to an increase risk of couples suffered from infertility [2]. There are nearly 200 million people diagnosed with infertility worldwide [3]. The incidence of infertility is increasing year by year in China [4]. Previous studies have shown that there were more than 50 million infertile patients in China in 2014, with a prevalence rate of 15% [5]. However, by 2023, the prevalence rate of infertility is expected to be as high as 18.2% [4, 6, 7].

Previous studies have shown that besides being unable to conceive naturally, infertility is also related to various physical and mental diseases such as anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and sleep disorder [8, 9]. In the past years, infertility was considered as a shameful disease, and society and family might give individuals and couples a greater psychological burden which greatly affected the physical and mental health of infertile patients [10]. For infertile patients, first went to outpatient consultation or chose assisted reproductive technology treatment might cause anxiety [11]. In Japan, about 67% of unmarried women believe that couples should have at least one child after marriage, while about 25% of married women believe that a couple is socially acceptable only after they have children, according to the study [12]. In China, people attach great importance to fertility [13, 14]. Even though women have relatively high family decision-making power than in the past, there still exist a tendency in society to think that "it is always women’s fault to have no children” [5, 15]. Therefore, compared to male patients, female infertility patients experienced greater psychosocial stress and were more likely to induce psychosocial related physical and mental disorders, such as anxiety, depression, obsessive compulsive symptoms, and sleep disorders [16].

In recent years, with the increasing incidence of infertility, more and more researchers have begun to pay attention to the psychological stress, such as anxiety and depression, of infertile women [5, 9, 17]. However, many of the current studies only focused on the relationship between stigma and psychological distress [4, 5, 12, 18], only few studies [13, 14] investigated the risk factors for psychological stress in infertile women. Besides, the sample size included in these studies were not large enough, and they only investigated the influence of demographic characteristics on psychological stress of infertile women. Thus, a large sample size study with more variables focused on psychological stress of infertile female patients was helpful for clinicians to accurately predict the high-risk factors and severity of psychological stress of infertile female patients and guide clinical decision-making.

Based on the above reasons, we designed a cross-sectional study to investigate the incidence of anxiety and depression symptoms of infertile female patients in West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, aiming at determining the risk factors causing anxiety and depression symptoms and predicting the risk of anxiety and depression of infertile female patients.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

The demographic characteristics, somatic symptoms, sleep quality and psychological stress of female infertile patients in our hospital were collected by questionnaire. Psychological stress refers to anxiety and depression. Patient health questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) was used to record physical symptoms and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) was used to record sleep quality. Anxiety and depression were assessed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9), respectively. In addition, anxiety and depression symptoms (converted into binary variables) were taken as dependent variables, and physical symptoms, sleep quality and demographic characteristics were taken as independent variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to select independent risk factors and quickly identify high-risk patients, so as to facilitate early psychological intervention.

Patient selection

During January 2020 to December 2020, female infertile patients who received assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment at infertility counseling department of West China Second Hospital were recruited and medical records of them were reviewed, and a total of 1712 female infertile patients were included in this study.

The inclusion criteria were: i) patient should be older than 20 years old; ii) patient had received primary school education and above and able to communicate normally; iii) patient had good physical condition and had not been diagnosed with mental illness before. Exclusion criteria: i) patient had impairment of reading, comprehension or writing; ii) patient was diagnosed with consciousness disorder and cognitive disorder of orientation.

Questionnaire design and content

Demographic characteristics include age, educational, occupation, causes of infertility. Physical symptoms (evaluated by PHQ-15) include 15 items such as abdominal pain, back pain, arm, leg or joint pain, dysmenorrhea, sexual intercourse pain, etc., and sleep quality (evaluated by PSQI) include 7 items (sleeping time, sleep efficiency, hypnotic drugs, etc.). The scores of GAD-7, PHQ-9, PHQ-15 and PSQI [19] in patients were shown in S1 File. The questionnaires were in Chinese format. A nurse (Lingyan Wang) with a National Psychological Consultant certification distributed and retrieved the questionnaires. And all the questionnaires were finished in the infertility counseling department of West China Second Hospital during January 2020 to December 2020. All the questionnaires were locked in a special box that could only be opened by Yuyang Wang. A monthly questionnaire count was performed independently by Lingyan Wang, Youyin Tang, and Yuyang Wang.

Generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) [20]

The scale for evaluating patients’ generalized anxiety symptoms and severity, one month prior to the study consists of 7 scoring items, and each item is scored according to 4 grades (0, 1, 2 and 3), with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The higher the score, the more serious the anxiety symptoms. Grading criteria: 0 to 4 for no anxiety, 5 to 9 for mild anxiety, 10 to 14 for moderate anxiety and 15 to 21 for severe anxiety.

Patient health questionnaire-9(PHQ-9) [21]

To evaluate the psychological condition of patients in the past 2 weeks, there were 9 items in total, and each item was scored according to 4 grades (0, 1, 2 and 3), with a total score ranging from 0 to 27. The higher the score, the more severe the depressive symptoms. Grading criteria: 0 to 4 for no depression, 5 to 9 for mild depression, 10 to 14 for moderate depression and 15 to 27 for severe depression.

Quality control and reliability & validity analysis [22]

The two researchers who participated in the quality control of this study were trained professionals (with the national third-class and above psychological counselor qualification certificate) to ensure the authenticity and validity of the questionnaire and scale. In this study, patients do not need to fill in private information such as their names and ID numbers, and all patients voluntarily participate in this study and sign informed consent forms. At the same time, researchers are not allowed to guide, mislead or fill in on their behalf.

Cronbach’s α coefficient and Spearman-Brown half-fold coefficient were used to analyze the reliability of the scale. Generally, Cronbach’s α coefficient> 0.7 and Spearman-Brown half-fold coefficient> 0.7 suggesting that the internal consistency of the questionnaire is good, that is, the reliability is good. Factor analysis was used to evaluate the structure validity of each scale by calculating the KMO value. KMO value> 0.6 indicates a well data structure validity. Calibration validity refers to the proximity between the scale measurement results and the standard measurement.

Ethical considerations

This study was a cross-sectional study which was approved by Medical Ethics Committee of West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University (Ethic number: No.2020167). Written informed consent was waived due to no individual information (such as patient’s name, ID card number, phone number and biometrics identification data) was identified.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are expressed by mean ± standard deviation (x± s), and t test is used for statistical analysis. Counting data is expressed as number (n), and chi-square test is applied for statistical analysis. The reliability of all scales was evaluated by Cronbach’s α and Spearman-Brown half coefficient, and KMO value was calculated by factor analysis to evaluate validity. Univariate and multivariate Logistic analysis was used to analyze the independent risk factors leading to anxiety symptoms or depression symptoms. Variables with p-value<0.1 in univariate analysis were further stepped in multivariate Logistic regression analysis. The test level α was 0.05. P value< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted with EmpowerStats software, version 2.20 and SPSS20.0 software.

Results

Demographic characteristics of patients

In this study, a total of 2301 female infertility patients were given questionnaires, among which 438 patients refused to participate in the survey, and 151 patients presented incomplete questionnaires. The flow diagram of this study was showed in (Fig 1). A total of 1712 valid questionnaires were recovered, with a questionnaire recovery rate of 74.4%. The patients ranged from 20 to 49 years old, with an average age of 32.1±4.59 years old. Besides, the incidence of anxiety and depression in infertile women were 25.2% and 31.3%, respectively. Among all the patients included in this study, there was 836 patients whose age range from 30 to 35 years old with the highest composition ratio of 48.8%. While 1118 patients had an education level of junior college or above, accounting for 65.3% of all patients. The differences were statistically significant (P< 0.05) (Table 1).

Fig 1. The flow diagram of this study.

Fig 1

Abbreviation: GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7; PHQ-15: Patient health questionnaire-15; PSQI: Pittsburgh sleep quality index; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionaire-9.

Table 1. The baseline characteristics of infertility women in this study.

Variable Anxiety symptoms(assessed by GAD-7)
No anxiety (n = 1267) Mild anxiety (n = 383) Moderate anxiety (n = 49) Severe anxiety (n = 13)
Age, year, n
(20, 29] 428 132 12 5
(30, 35] 601* 199 30 6
>35 238 52 7 2
Educational level, n
Junior high school  247 49 7 4
High school 220 59 8 0
Junior college degrees or above 800* 275 34 9
Occupational status, n
Employed 603 208 27 6
Un-employed 664 175 22 7
Causes of infertility, n
Primary infertility 557 184 23 5
Secondary infertility 710 199 26 8
Sleep quality # , n
Very well 819 91 2 1
General 431 257 33 4
Poor 17 34 14 8
Awful sleep quality 0 1 0 0
Somatic Symptoms & , n
No 924 107 6 1
Mild 302 170 18 3
Moderate 36 92 18 5
Severe 5 14 7 4

Abbreviation: GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7

# Assessed by Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)

&Assessed by Physical Health Questionnaire-15(PHQ-15).

* Statistically difference (P<0.05)

Reliability, construction validity and spearman correlation analysis of the scale

Cronbach’s α coefficients of PHQ-15, GAD-7, PHQ-9 and PSQI were 0.809, 0.870, 0.825 and 0.758 respectively. Spearman-Brown half-fold coefficients were 0.700, 0.852, 0.793 and 0.783 respectively, and KMO values were 0.892, 0.890, 0.913 and 0.862 respectively. Cronbach’s α coefficients and Spearman-Brown half-fold coefficients suggested that the reliability and construction validity of the four scales included in this study are good (P < 0.001). (Shown in S1 File).

Spearman correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficients was well (P < 0.001). (Shown in S1 File).

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of anxiety and depressive symptoms

Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis showed that education level (junior college degree or above, OR:1. 6, 95%CI: 1.2–2.1, P = 0.003), somatic symptoms (severe somatic symptoms, OR:15.2, 95%CI: 5.6–41.3, P<0.001), sleep quality (poor sleep quality, OR:9.3, 95%CI:4.7–18.4, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for anxiety. The univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis of anxiety was showed in Table 2.

Table 2. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the anxiety in infertile women.

Variable Univariate analysis (p value) Multivariate analysis OR (95%CI) p value
Age, year
(20, 29] ref ref ref
(30, 35] 0.28 1.1(0.8, 1.4) 0.52
>35 0.06 0.8(0.5, 1.2) 0.22
Occupational status
Employed ref ref ref
Un-employed 0.71 1.2(0.8, 1.8) 0.77
Educational background
Junior high school ref ref ref
Higher school 0.27 1.4(0.9, 2.2) 0.13
Junior college degrees or above <0.001 1.6(1.2, 2.1) 0.003
Somatic Symptoms *
No ref ref ref
Mild <0.001 3.4(2.6, 4.5) <0.001
Moderate <0.001 13.3(9.3, 19.1) <0.001
Severe <0.001 15.2(5.6, 41.3) <0.001
Causes of infertility
Primary infertility ref ref ref
Secondary infertility 0.88 1.0(0.8, 1.3) 0.26
Sleep quality # , n
Very well ref ref ref
General <0.001 3.3(2.6, 4.2) <0.001
Poor <0.001 9.3(4.7, 18.4) <0.001
Awful sleep quality 0.97 - -

Abbreviation: ref: reference; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

*Assessed by Physical Health Questionnaire-15(PHQ-15).

# Assessed by Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)

Univariate and multivariate Logistic analysis showed that age>35 years old, moderate and severe somatic symptoms and poor sleep quality were independent risk factors for depression. Severe somatic symptoms and poor sleep quality had a very strong contribution to anxiety, with an Odds Ratio of 13.3 and 16.1 respectively. The univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic analysis of depress was showed in Table 3.

Table 3. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the depression in infertile women.

Variable Univariate analysis (p value) Multivariate analysis OR (95%CI) p value
Age, year
(20, 29] Ref ref Ref
(30, 35] 0.670 1.0(0.8, 1.3) 0.99
>35 0.012 0.7(0.5, 0.98) 0.044
Occupational status
Employed Ref ref ref
Un-employed 0.167 0.9(0.7, 1.3) 0.90
Educational background
Junior high school Ref ref ref
Higher school 0.769 1.0(0.6, 1.5) 0.88
Junior college degrees or above 0.016 1.3(1.0, 1.8) 0.089
Physical Symptoms *
No ref ref ref
Mild <0.001 4.0(3.1, 5.2) <0.001
Moderate <0.001 14.8(8.9, 24.6) <0.001
Severe <0.001 13.3(4.0, 44.2) <0.001
Causes of infertility
Primary infertility Ref ref ref
Secondary infertility 0.736 0.7(0.5, 0.9) 0.99
Sleep quality # , n
Very well Ref ref ref
General <0.001 3.1(2.6, 3.7) <0.001
Poor <0.001 16.1(7.1, 36.5) <0.001
Awful sleep quality 0.965 - -

Abbreviation: ref: reference; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

*Assessed by Physical Health Questionnaire-15(PHQ-15).

# Assessed by Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)

Discussion

We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the prevalence of anxiety and depression among women treated for infertility and the independent risk factors for anxiety and depression. This study found that anxiety symptoms and depression in infertile women were significantly correlated with their educational level, physical symptoms and sleep quality, rather than occupation status and infertility reasons. In addition, age> 35 years old is an independent risk factor for depression. Therefore, psychoeducation is necessary for infertile women who combined the above risk factors to reduce the risk of anxiety or depression. The main findings and impacts are discussed as follows.

In China, people attach great importance to fertility, and there is a tendency in society to think that "it is always a woman’s fault to have no children” [5]. This study found that the incidence of anxiety and depression in infertile women were 25.2% and 31.3%, respectively, which is lower than the incidence of anxiety and depressed reported in Japan of 51.1% and 54%, respectively [12]. It might be due to Japan’s developed economy and high social pressure that young women with infertility were more likely to experience anxiety and depression.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that moderate and severe somatic symptoms were independent risk factors of anxiety (P<0.001) and depression in infertile patients (P< 0.001), and severe somatic symptoms can increase the risk of anxiety symptoms by 14.2-fold. Further analysis of the sources of patients’ physical symptoms shows that dysmenorrhea and other menstrual problems account for 58% (P<0.05). In addition, many studies have shown that all kinds of pain can increase the risk of anxiety and depression, which were consistent with the conclusion of our study [2325]. Similarly, a study of women with dysmenorrhea found that they were also more likely to experience anxiety and depression [26]. Therefore, clinical attention should be paid to patients’ dysmenorrhea and other somatic symptoms in order to reduce their risk of anxiety and depression.

Infertile women were 16.1 times more likely to be depressed when their sleep quality is poor, showing a strong connection between poor sleep quality and depression. Previous investigations [2729] implied that insomnia can increase the risk of depression or anxiety through impair emotional regulation, which supported our result. In addition, analysis of the PSQI scale revealed that 71.8% of patients suffered from subjective sleep disorders, but only 0.99% of patients used hypnotic drugs for sleep. Although we don’t know why only a few patients use hypnotics to sleep, we think that the sleep quality of patients can be improved by strengthening the preaching of safe use of hypnotics to help patients sleep and guiding patients to actively go to sleep medical centers.

The study also found that having a junior college degree or higher increased the risk of anxiety symptoms (P = 0.003), but not depression symptoms (P = 0.089). Although the impact of education level on anxiety is controversial, the majorities believed that higher education level will increase the incidence of anxiety disorder, especially for women, this is because the current labor market cannot provide adequate economic or social resources for people with higher education level, and this mismatch between labor and salary will lead to depression and disappointment of people with higher education, which might further result in mental illness [30]. In China, with the development of economy, women usually receive good education, however, the ensuing saturation of labor market will also increase the life and work pressure of higher education people, and then bring psychological stress. Previous studies have suggested that the influence of education level on mental health is not simply increasing linearly, but there is a threshold. Once the education level is higher than this threshold, the risk of mental illness will greatly increase [31, 32], which is also consistent with the current conclusion of our research that highly educated infertile patients are more likely to have anxiety symptoms. Although we didn’t deeply explore why high education level has such a different impact on anxiety and depression, it is completely consistent with the relationship between Japanese infertile women’s education level and anxiety or depression reported in Yokota’s research [12], which further proves the reliability of our research conclusions. Therefore, we should provide the psychological test and offer psychoeducation for highly educated infertile women to reduce the impact of anxiety and depression on them.

The age of infertile woman (>35 years) was another independent risk factor for depressive symptoms (P<0.05). These finding was similar to many previous study conducted in other provinces of China [13, 14]. And the possible reason might be that with the increase of age, the probability of successful conception of infertile patients will gradually decrease [33]. A large clinical study involving 1612 women with a total of 4246 insemination cycles showed that when the age of infertile patients is over 35 years old, the clinical pregnancy rate after intrauterine insemination will decrease from 27.1% to 21.6% [34], which may be the potential cause of depression in elderly patients. Consequently, infertile women who over 35 might benefit from psychoeducation to reduce anxiety and depression.

However, there are still some limitation in this study. Firstly, this study is a single-center cross-sectional study, and there is inevitable selectivity bias. The results of this study still need to be confirmed by multicenter prospective studies. In addition, the high rate of lost follow-up among infertile outpatients makes it difficult to reevaluate all patients, which will have an impact on the study’s repeatability. Finally, during the study period, COVID-19 pandemic broke out, and the psychological state of infertile women patients may be affected by COVID-19 pandemic, so it might have an impact on the research conclusion. However, most of the patients included in the study were from Sichuan Province which the epidemic is not serious in this area. Thus, the selection bias of this study in COVID-19 pandemic was relatively low. And we will carry out a large-scale multicenter related research in order to draw more scientific conclusions and help clinicians make more comprehensive clinical decisions in the future.

Conclusions

Moderate and severe somatic symptoms and poor sleep quality can significantly increase the risk of anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms of infertile woman. And high educated (junior college degree or above) patients are more likely to be complicated with anxiety symptoms, while elderly patients (age>35) are more likely to be complicated with depression symptoms. Therefore, psychoeducation is necessary for infertile women who combined the above risk factors to reduce the risk of anxiety or depression.

Supporting information

S1 File. The details of four scales and reliability and validity analysis of four scales.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the research platform provided by West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University and the statistical assistance provided by West China Big Data Center.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Chambers GM, Dyer S, Zegers-Hochschild F, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Banker M, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014dagger. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2021;36(11):2921–34. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab198 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fabamwo AO, Akinola OI. The understanding and acceptability of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among infertile women in urban Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2013;33(1):71–4. Epub 2015/03/25 2012/12/25. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.730077 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Human reproduction update. 2015;21(4):411–26. Epub 2017/10/17. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao Q, Huangfu C, Li J, Liu H, Tang N. Psychological Resilience as the Mediating Factor Between Stigma and Social Avoidance and Distress of Infertility Patients in China: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Psychology research and behavior management. 2022;15:391–403. Epub 2022/07/16. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S354803 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang F, Lv Y, Wang Y, Cheng X, Yan Y, Zhang Y, et al. The social stigma of infertile women in Zhejiang Province, China: a questionnaire-based study. BMC women’s health. 2021;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01246-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Ziegler D, Gambone JC, Meldrum DR, Chapron C. Risk and safety management in infertility and assisted reproductive technology (ART): from the doctor’s office to the ART procedure. Psychology research and behavior management. 2013;100(6):1509–17. Epub 2022/03/02. doi: 10.2147/prbm.s35480310.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.020 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8882026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou Z, Zheng D, Wu H, Li R, Xu S, Kang Y, et al. Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population-based study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018;125(4):432–41. Epub 2013/11/10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.02010.1111/1471-0528.14966 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Simionescu G, Doroftei B, Maftei R, Obreja BE, Anton E, Grab D, et al. The complex relationship between infertility and psychological distress (Review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2021;21(4):306. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9737 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7885086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Teklemicheal AG, Kassa EM, Weldetensaye EK. Prevalence and correlates of infertility related psychological stress in women with infertility: a cross-sectional hospital based survey. BMC Psychology. 2022;10(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00804-w ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8988399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhu H, Shi L, Wang R, Cui L, Wang J, Tang M, et al. Global Research Trends on Infertility and Psychology From the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2022;13:889845. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.889845 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9317298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holter H, Anderheim L, Bergh C, Möller A. First IVF treatment—short-term impact on psychological well-being and the marital relationship. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2006;21(12):3295–302. Epub 2006/08/26. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del288 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yokota R, Okuhara T. Association between Stigma and Anxiety, Depression, and Psychological Distress among Japanese Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;10(7):1300. Epub 2023/01/27. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071300 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liang S, Chen Y, Wang Q, Chen H, Cui C, Xu X, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of infertility among 20–49 year old women in Henan Province, China. Reproductive Health. 2021;18:254. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01298-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8691046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu C, Yan L, He C, Wang Y, Wu J, Chen L, et al. Incidence and risk factors of infertility among couples who desire a first and second child in Shanghai, China: a facility-based prospective cohort study. Reproductive Health. 2022;19:155. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01459-x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9270756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Péloquin K, Brassard A, Arpin V, Sabourin S, Wright J. Whose fault is it? Blame predicting psychological adjustment and couple satisfaction in couples seeking fertility treatment. Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018;39(1):64–72. Epub 2017/06/22. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1289369 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Madero S, Gameiro S, García D, Cirera D, Vassena R, Rodríguez A. Quality of life, anxiety and depression of German, Italian and French couples undergoing cross-border oocyte donation in Spain. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2017;32(9):1862–70. Epub 2017/09/01. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex247 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kamboj N, Saraswathy KN, Prasad S, Babu N, Puri M, Sharma A, et al. Women infertility and common mental disorders: A cross-sectional study from North India. Plos one. 2023;18(1):e0280054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280054 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9815660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xie Y, Ren Y, Niu C, Zheng Y, Yu P, Li L. The impact of stigma on mental health and quality of life of infertile women: A systematic review. Plos one. 2022;13:1093459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093459 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9869765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry research. 1989;28(2):193–213. Epub 1989/05/01. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tomitaka S, Furukawa TA. The GAD-7 and the PHQ-8 exhibit the same mathematical pattern of item responses in the general population: analysis of data from the National Health Interview Survey. BMC Psychology. 2021;9(1):149. Epub 2021/09/25. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00657-9 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8461873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pranckeviciene A, Saudargiene A, Gecaite-Stonciene J, Liaugaudaite V, Griskova-Bulanova I, Simkute D, et al. Validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 and the generalized anxiety disorder-7 in Lithuanian student sample. Plos one. 2022;17(1):e0263027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263027 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alkhadim GS. Cronbach’s Alpha and Semantic Overlap Between Items: A Proposed Correction and Tests of Significance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:815490. Epub 2022/03/01. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815490 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8867700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karlson CW, Alberts NM, Liu W, Brinkman TM, Annett RD, Mulrooney DA, et al. Longitudinal pain and pain interference in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer. 2020;126(12):2915–23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32853 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu C, Xu J, Lin Y, Ju P, Duan D, Luo Y, et al. Loss of Microglia and Impaired Brain-Neurotrophic Factor Signaling Pathway in a Comorbid Model of Chronic Pain and Depression. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2018;9:442. Epub 2022/06/14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00442 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9395447 Pmc6190863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu M, Chen Y, Shen Z, Zhu Y, Xiao S, Zhu X, et al. Electroacupuncture Alleviates Anxiety-Like Behaviors Induced by Chronic Neuropathic Pain via Regulating Different Dopamine Receptors of the Basolateral Amygdala. Molecular neurobiology. 2022;59(9):5299–311. Epub 2020/04/01. doi: 10.1007/s12035-022-02911-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7245551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Faramarzi M, Salmalian H. Association of psychologic and nonpsychologic factors with primary dysmenorrhea. Iranian Red Crescent medical journal. 2014;16(8):e16307. Epub 2018/10/26. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16307 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4222008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suo X, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Zhao G, Zhu Y, Liu Y, et al. A mental health survey among young front-line clinicians in high-risk areas during the COVID-19 sporadic epidemic in China. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2022;13:872331. Epub 2022/09/17. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.872331 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9468417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jaussent I, Bouyer J, Ancelin ML, Akbaraly T, Pérès K, Ritchie K, et al. Insomnia and daytime sleepiness are risk factors for depressive symptoms in the elderly. Sleep. 2011;34(8):1103–10. Epub 2011/08/02. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1170 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3138165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hertenstein E, Feige B, Gmeiner T, Kienzler C, Spiegelhalder K, Johann A, et al. Insomnia as a predictor of mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep medicine reviews. 2019;43:96–105. Epub 2018/12/12. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.10.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Carpinelli Mazzi M, Iavarone A, Musella C, De Luca M, de Vita D, Branciforte S, et al. Time of isolation, education and gender influence the psychological outcome during COVID-19 lockdown in caregivers of patients with dementia. European Geriatric Medicine. 2020;11(6):1095–8. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00413-z ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7556578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Link BG, Phelan JC, Miech R, Westin EL. The resources that matter: fundamental social causes of health disparities and the challenge of intelligence. Journal of health and social behavior. 2008;49(1):72–91. Epub 2008/04/19. doi: 10.1177/002214650804900106 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bracke P, Pattyn E, von dem Knesebeck O. Overeducation and depressive symptoms: diminishing mental health returns to education. Sociology of health & illness. 2013;35(8):1242–59. Epub 2013/08/06. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12039 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dinelli L, Courbière B, Achard V, Jouve E, Deveze C, Gnisci A, et al. Prognosis factors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination with the husband’s sperm: conclusions of an analysis of 2,019 cycles. Fertility and sterility. 2014;101(4):994–1000. Epub 2014/02/19. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schorsch M, Gomez R, Hahn T, Hoelscher-Obermaier J, Seufert R, Skala C. Success Rate of Inseminations Dependent on Maternal Age? An Analysis of 4246 Insemination Cycles. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2013;73(8):808–11. Epub 2014/04/29. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350615 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3859121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jacopo Di Giuseppe

20 Mar 2023

PONE-D-23-04196Predictors of depressive and anxiety in women undergoing infertility treatment: a cross-sectional studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 04 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jacopo Di Giuseppe

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: TITLE: Depressive should be substituted with depression and this should also be done in the short title

ABSTRACT: Lines 24-25 is not clear and should be recasted. In lines 28-29, CAD, PHQ, KMO should all be written in full 1st . The authors should include a summary of how the patients were selected and state the study design here. Lines 39-42, it is not clear if the authors are reporting results and there is not conclusion in the abstract.

INTRODUCTION: There are several grammatical errors and wrong use of tenses that make several statement difficult to understand. The statements in the following lines are not clear and should be recasted, 56-58, 58-59, 64-67, 70-72, 74-76, . Line 78 should be --- determining the risk factors---.

METHODS: Several grammatical errors and wrong use of tenses. How were the patients selected and how did the authors determine their sample size? The questionnaires should all be referenced. Line 112 should read --- severity , one month prior to the study---- . Who distributed the questionnaires, how were they administered , when and where was this done and what language were they? Under ethical considerations, it is not clear if approval for conduct of the study was given by the ethical review committe and in line 138 , what individual information are the authors referring to?

RESULTS: It is not clear in lines 159-160 which differences were statistically significant.

DISCUSSION: There is no need to repeat p values or odds ratios that are in the results here. There are also very many grammatical errors and wrong use of tenses that make many sentences difficult to understand. The following sentences should be recast6ed for clarity,; lines 212-213, 216-217, 219-220, 227-229, in 247 what do the authors mean by -- another founding--?. Lines 254-255 and 258-259 are not clear.

REFERNCES. The authors should crosscheck the journal title of reference number 2. The following references do not seem complete; 8,9,10,12,17 and 18

Reviewer #2: I suggest to include the incidence in the title because incidence was mentioned as one of the objectives.

Discussion

the rate (incidence of the anxiety was not discussed. Authors jumped directly to associated factors.

Incidence have to be compared with previous studies and to discuss who there is difference between the other studies.

I think sleep problem or pattern are not predictors for anxiety and depression but are effects. e,g are manifestation for anxiety and depression.

Reviewer #3: The article is an interesting one.

The methodology is not detailed enough. For instance, the administration of the questionnaire was not clearly described. I got to know about it in the result section.

The authors should do the corrections in the manuscript as suggested before publication.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Habiba Ibrahim Abdullahi

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: REVIEW PLOS ONE.docx

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284414.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Mar 2023

Reviewer #1:

(i) TITLE: Depressive should be substituted with depression and this should also be done in the short title

Thanks for your suggestion and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have changed this word.

(ii) ABSTRACT: Lines 24-25 is not clear and should be recasted. In lines 28-29, CAD, PHQ, KMO should all be written in full 1st. The authors should include a summary of how the patients were selected and state the study design here. Lines 39-42, it is not clear if the authors are reporting results and there is not conclusion in the abstract.

Thanks for your suggestions and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have recasted the abstract. And since “the format criteria of PLOs One” the conclusion can be found in the last two paragraph of abstract “Somatic symptoms and poor sleep quality are both the risk factors of anxiety and depression symptoms of infertile woman. And high educated (junior college degree or above) patients are more likely to be complicated with anxiety symptoms, while elderly patients (age>35) are prone to be complicated with depression symptoms.”

(iii) INTRODUCTION: There are several grammatical errors and wrong use of tenses that make several statement difficult to understand. The statements in the following lines are not clear and should be recasted, 56-58, 58-59, 64-67, 70-72, 74-76, . Line 78 should be --- determining the risk factors---.

Thanks for your questions and suggestions and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have revised our manuscript.

(iv) METHODS: Several grammatical errors and wrong use of tenses. How were the patients selected and how did the authors determine their sample size? The questionnaires should all be referenced. Line 112 should read --- severity, one month prior to the study----. Who distributed the questionnaires, how were they administered, when and where was this done and what language were they? Under ethical considerations, it is not clear if approval for conduct of the study was given by the ethical review committee and in line 138, what individual information are the authors referring to?

Thanks for your questions and suggestions and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have revised our manuscript.

For patient selection, all patients who came to our hospital for infertility counseling during January 2020 to December 2020 were asked to finish the questionnaires and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were shown in the manuscript. EmpowerStats software was used to calculate the sample size of the study. Power analysis of the study were shown in the following table. We chose the lowest hazards ratio (college degrees or above:1.6) to calculate the estimated samples size, and the estimated samples size should be more than 914.

Anxiety/No anxiety value Depression/ No depression value

Two-sided α 0.05 Two-sided α 0.05

The incidence of anxiety in infertile women 0.252 The incidence of depression in infertile women 0.056

Assuming hazard ratio of Junior college degrees or above 1.6 Assuming hazard ratio of general sleep quality 3.1

Power 90% Power 90%

Estimated patients number in this study 914 Estimated patients number in this study 136

The questionnaires were in Chinese format and distributed by a nurse who have obtained a certification of National Psychological Consultant, her name was Lingyan Wang. And all the questionnaires were finished in the infertility counseling department of West China Second Hospital. All the questionnaires were locked down in a special box, and counted every month by Lingyan Wang, Youyin Tang and Yuyang Wang.

Written informed consent was waived due to no individual information (such as patient’s name, ID card number, phone number and biometrics identification data) was identified.

(v) RESULTS: It is not clear in lines 159-160 which differences were statistically significant.

Thanks for your question and we appreciated for your carefully review. In this sentence, we mean to say that the age and education level had significant difference in no anxiety patients. And we add a “*” in table 1 to express this statistically difference.

(vi) DISCUSSION: There is no need to repeat p values or odds ratios that are in the results here. There are also very many grammatical errors and wrong use of tenses that make many sentences difficult to understand. The following sentences should be recasted for clarity; lines 212-213, 216-217, 219-220, 227-229, in 247 what do the authors mean by -- another founding--?. Lines 254-255 and 258-259 are not clear.

Thanks for your question and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have revised our manuscript according to the above questions.

(vii) REFERNCES. The authors should crosscheck the journal title of reference number 2. The following references do not seem complete; 8,9,10,12,17 and 18

Thanks for your question and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have checked our references and revised some of them.

Reviewer #2:

(i) I suggest to include the incidence in the title because incidence was mentioned as one of the objectives.

Thanks for your suggestion and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have changed the title.

(ii) Discussion

the rate (incidence of the anxiety was not discussed. Authors jumped directly to associated factors. Incidence have to be compared with previous studies and to discuss who there is difference between the other studies.

Thanks for your suggestion and we appreciated for your carefully review. Actually, we have discussed the incidence of anxiety and depression and compared with previous studies in Line 225-227 in Discussion part. Besides, we added more details of the incidence and adjusted the position of this paragraph.

(iii) I think sleep problem or pattern are not predictors for anxiety and depression but are effects. e,g are manifestation for anxiety and depression.

Thanks for your question and we appreciated for your carefully review. We agree with your opinion that sleep problem might be manifestation for anxiety and depression. In this study we only want to explain the relationship between sleep problem and anxiety or depression, and we noticed that poor sleep quality patients had a strong association with depression. Therefore, we revised our manuscript according your suggestion.

Reviewer #3:

(i) The article is an interesting one. The methodology is not detailed enough. For instance, the administration of the questionnaire was not clearly described. I got to know about it in the result section.

Thanks for your suggestions and we appreciated for your carefully review. We have revised our manuscript according your suggestion. The administration of the questionnaire were as follows.

“The questionnaires were in Chinese format. A nurse (Lingyan Wang) with a National Psychological Consultant certification distributed and retrieved the questionnaires. And all the questionnaires were finished in the infertility counseling department of West China Second Hospital during January 2020 to December 2020. All the questionnaires were locked in a special box that could only be opened by Yuyang Wang. A monthly questionnaire count was performed independently by Lingyan Wang, Youyin Tang, and Yuyang Wang.”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Jacopo Di Giuseppe

30 Mar 2023

Predictors and incidence of depression and anxiety in women undergoing infertility treatment: a cross-sectional study

PONE-D-23-04196R1

Dear Dr. Wang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jacopo Di Giuseppe

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Jacopo Di Giuseppe

4 Apr 2023

PONE-D-23-04196R1

Predictors and incidence of depression and anxiety in women undergoing infertility treatment: a cross-sectional study

Dear Dr. Wang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

MD Jacopo Di Giuseppe

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. The details of four scales and reliability and validity analysis of four scales.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: REVIEW PLOS ONE.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES