Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 28;44(2):154–167. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000838

Table A2. Characteristics of all studies of frequent callers and repeat callers (N = 27).

Reference Frequent callers definition from article Sample size
Country
Type of study
Apsler and Hoople (1976) More than one call 11,703
United States
Records audit
Barmann (1980) Five times a day for a period of 1 month or longer 14
United States
Intervention study
Bassilios et al. (2015) More than one call Noncallers: n = 8,751; single callers: n = 44; repeat callers: n = 46
Australia
Helpline questions from a national mental health and wellbeing survey
Berman (1990) No clear definition provided 1
United States
Single case study
Brockopp et al. (2002) More than 10 calls in 9 months Frequent callers: n = 24; nonfrequent callers: n = 378
United States
Records audit, no comparison with nonfrequent callers
Brunet et al. (1994) More than 10 calls/month 5
Canada
Intervention study
Burgess et al. (2008) More than 10 calls/month The center answered a total of 1,404 calls in the study period. Of these, 439 calls met the inclusion criteria (i.e., not crisis and not short referral), 270 callers agreed to participate and 71 declined participation. The remaining 98 calls were from repeat callers
Australia
Survey of helplines crisis callers
De Carli (1988) Twice a week for at least one month 9
United States
Survey of helplines crisis callers
Greer (1976) At least 19 contacts over 2 years Frequent callers: n = 37; random sample of single-call callers: n = 26
United States
Survey of helpline callers
Hall and Schlosar (1995) No clear definition provided 13,510 calls
Canada
Intervention study; no comparisons
Haycock (1998) At least 10 calls over 12 months, very frequent callers at least 50 Callers chosen from people with 6 or more contacts with a mental health service during 1 year. Compared frequent callers (n = 30) with very frequent callers (n = 10)
United States
Survey of helpline callers who were in contact with a mental health service
Hirsch (1981) No clear definition provided Listened to 100 calls, no indication how many were frequent callers
Canada
Records audit and clinical impressions from listening to calls
Johnson and Barry (1978) Total number of calls studied (some were more than 10/month) 100 callers categorized by frequency of calls
United States
Records audit relating overall number of calls to nature of problems
Kinzel and Nanson (2000) Nonapplicable Nonapplicable
Not available
Literature review on crisis line volunteers’ impressions
Lester and Brockopp (1970) More than 10 calls in 9 months 24
United States
Records audit
Middleton, Gunn et al. (2016) ≥20/month
Australia
19
Australia
Semistructured telephone interviews with frequent callers
Middleton et al. (2017) ≥20/month 315
Frequent callers: n = 69; repeat callers: n = 162; unique callers: n = 79
Survey of helplines crisis callers
Middleton, Gunn et al. (2016) ≥4/month 789 participants
Australia
Records audit of frequent use of telephone helplines and health service use over time in general practice attendees with depressive symptoms
Mishara and Daigle (1997) Multiple calls/same problem 617 calls from 263 callers, of which 25% of callers repeatedly called and had a dossier as a “chronic caller” at the center
Canada
Intervention study
O’Neill et al. (2019) Cluster analyses identified two clusters of “prolific” callers: those who call thousands of times and hundreds of times A total of 3.449 million calls (= 725 calls per 1,000 population), with a cluster of callers who have a pattern of calling thousands of times, generally with calls under 10 minutes, and others who call hundreds of times with longer calls.
Ireland
Records audit of call frequency and duration data
Pirkis et al. (2016) ≥20/month Nonapplicable
Australia
Review and document audit and survey
Sawyer and Jameton (1979) Multiple calls for same problem 67
United States
Records audit
Speer (1971) Listed total calls over 2 months Found that 17 of 418 callers called 20 or more times over 2 months, no further descriptive data on frequent callers
United States
Records audit
Spittal et al. (2015) 0.667 calls per day in any period from 1 week to 549 days (4.7 in 7 days, 20 in 30 days, etc.) N = 98,174 individuals (411,725 calls) n = 75,362 single callers (75,362 calls)
n = 22,818 repeat callers (336,365 calls)
n = 2,595 frequent callers (247,547 calls)
Australia
Records audit
Torop and Torop (1972) No clear definition provided Nonapplicable
United States
Intervention study
Vivekananda, Bamford et al. (2019) No clear definition provided 33
Australia
Intervention study
Vivekananda, Cuppari et al. (2019) No clear definition provided Nonapplicable
Australia
Semistructured telephone interviews with 10 senior clinical supervisors at four helplines