Abstract
Reconfigurable metasurfaces offer great promises to enhance photonics technology by combining integration with improved functionalities. Recently, reconfigurability in otherwise static metasurfaces has been achieved by modifying the electric permittivity of the meta-atoms themselves or their immediate surrounding. Yet, it remains challenging to achieve significant and fast tunability without increasing bulkiness. Here, we demonstrate an ultrathin tunable metalens whose focal distance can be changed through optomechanical control with moderate continuous wave intensities. We achieve fast focal length changes of more than 5% with response time of the order of 10 μs.
Keywords: Optomechanics, Reconfigurable metasurface, Nanophotonics, Metalens
A metalens is a two-dimensional (2D) metasurface1−3 that controls the amplitude, polarization, and phase of the impinging light using engineered sub-wavelength resonators, also known as meta-atoms (MA), judicially arranged in periodic or quasi-periodic arrays.2,4−6 To date, metalenses are the center of intense research efforts and have shown great potential to replace bulky optical elements, sometimes even with superior performance.7 However, the intrinsic passive nature of metalenses limits their use where active operation is required, such as adaptive vision and imaging.5−12 To address this challenge, various approaches have emerged that rely on changing the optical properties of the meta-atoms themselves or their surrounding medium.6,12−26 In particular, promising advances were reported using electro-optic control,12,16−18 temperature-induced effects,19,20 light-induced effects,21−25 phase change media,26 and mechanical actuation.6,13−15 Despite this progress, it remains challenging to combine compactness, fast operation speed, and low energy consumption. For instance, a phase-change material-based metasurface provides large tunability and ultrafast switch ON time (up to MHz) but suffers from long switch OFF time.27 Similarly, electrically controlled liquid crystal (LC) embedded metalenses operate at low driving voltages (<10 V). However, they require bulky LC chambers and are polarization-dependent due to the birefringence of the LC.12,28 Micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS)-based technologies promise large focal length changes and high switching speed but require high driving voltages.6,15 On the other hand, mechanical stretching requires bulky mechanical arms limiting integration and response time.14
Optomechanics,29−35 where optical forces mediate the interaction between light and structural mechanics, offers new possibilities for reconfigurable metasurfaces. When considering suspended meta-atoms patterned in a thin membrane, the enhanced electromagnetic forces at resonance can exceed elastic forces of the material, thereby inducing mechanical deformation. Already a small deformation alters the phase delay incurred by the impinging light substantially.36 First proposed theoretically,37 the concept of optomechanical metasurfaces features giant nonlinearity, optical bistability, and asymmetric light transmission. Shortly after, optomechanically induced modulation of light transmission through a metasurface was experimentally demonstrated.38 Similarly, gold meta-atoms supported by pairs of free-standing silicon nitride strings exhibit individual optomechanical plasmonic resonances.39 An experimental study of a suspended silicon carbide (SiC) metasurface supporting multimode vibrational resonances was reported.40 More recently, an experimental demonstration of nonreciprocal transmission and optical bistability at low intensity (∼10 W/cm2) in a free-standing Si3N4 membrane-based metasurface was presented.41 These observations suggest optomechanical control as a promising approach toward compact, fast, and low-power tunable metalenses.
In this Communication, we design, fabricate, and characterize an ultrathin optomechanically reconfigurable metalens operating in the near-IR regime. Our metalens is formed by an ensemble of suspended Huygens’ meta-atoms42 carved in a free-standing crystalline silicon membrane, as illustrated in Figure 1. The metalens is designed to focus the probe light at λprobe = 1.31 μm while being controlled by a pump beam at λpump = 1.55 μm. Optical forces experienced by the meta-atoms translate into a mechanical deformation of the metalens (Δz) and consequently a change in the focal length Δf. Beyond demonstrating the tunability of the focal length by the pump light, we perform a full characterization of the lens performance including power dependence, focusing efficiency, and time response.
Combining light focusing with optomechanical control requires careful multimode engineering at both pump and probe wavelengths. On the one hand, the set of meta-atoms must cover phase changes from 0 to 2π at λprobe. On the other hand, an additional mode at λpump is required to induce optical forces causing a sufficiently large mechanical deformation. To meet these requirements, we selected a rectangular periodic arrangement of suspended Huygens’ meta-atoms with periodicity Px (Py) along the x (y) axis, in a 200 nm-thick silicon membrane. Each meta-atom consists of a disk with radius r, attached to a transversal nanobeam of width w2 via a short neck of width w1 (Figure 2a). Design optimization used a commercial finite element method simulator (COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS). Figure 2b displays the transmission T and reflection R for a specific meta-atom with r = 0.2 μm, w1 = w2 = 0.095 μm, and Px = Py = 1.275 μm. Under x-polarized light, the disk supports magnetic and electric dipolar resonances around λprobe = 1.31 μm. The interaction between the electric and magnetic dipole resonances, controlled by the disk radius r, introduces a phase delay of the incoming light.42,43 Additionally, the disk attached to the supporting beam supports an electric mode around λpump, which we use for optomechanical control.
Next, we optimized an entire set of meta-atoms to provide 0–2π phase change at λprobe, by changing the disk radius r and beam width w2 simultaneously. The simulated phase imparted (ϕMA) by these meta-atoms at λprobe are shown in Figure 2c as a function of r (yellow solid line with triangular markers), while the respective w2 parameter is given in Table 1 in the Supporting Information. The periodicity and the width were kept constant at Px = Py = 1.275 μm and w1 = 0.095 μm, respectively.
In addition, we used the time-averaged Maxwell’s stress tensors to calculate the optical forces acting on the meta-atoms, as a function of the disc radius r (see Supporting Information for details). Figure 2c shows that the subunit (see Figure S4a in Supporting Information) of the meta-atoms experiences antiparallel forces along the z-direction, while the forces cancel out in the xy plane. The disk experiences a negative force that pulls against the illumination direction. Conversely, the beam is pushed by the incoming light. This force imbalance across the meta-atom introduces a tilt of the disk with respect to the beam, while the total positive force over a finite periodic array bends the whole array forward. Furthermore, we numerically simulated the deformation Δz, for a maximum pump intensity of Ip = 110 μW/μm2 for each meta-atom arranged equidistantly in a one-dimensional (1D) array of 100 μm.37Figure 2d shows the deformation Δz as a function of disk radius r. We observe a maximum deformation Δz ≈ 380 nm for the meta-atom with r = 200 nm. Heating of the metalens under pump illumination induces thermal expansion and bending in the suspended meta-atoms. In order to quantify the thermal effects, we simulated the thermal distribution for each meta-atom using COMSOL MULTIPHYSIS (see Supporting Information for method). Figure S1b shows the temperature distribution for a meta-atom array with r = 0.22 μm for Ip = 110 μW/μm2. Similarly, Figure S1c shows the maximum temperature change ΔTmax for all the meta-atoms in the library. The maximum ΔTmax = 250 K occurs for the meta-atom with radius r = 0.21 μm. Based on the coefficient of thermal expansion of silicon,44−46 the thermally induced buckling of the array of length L = 100 μm is expected to be of only few nanometers. From these simulations, we conclude that the thermal expansion is negligible when compared to the optomechanically induced deformation.
To calculate the required phase profile ϕreq(x, y) in the xy-plane, which focuses light at focal length f, we used the hyperboloidal phase function.
We fixed the focal distance and diameter of the metalens at f = 300 μm and D = 100 μm, respectively. We discretized the continuous ϕreq(x, y) with a suitable meta-atom such that, at a given x and y position, |ϕMA – ϕreq(x, y)| is minimized.
To fabricate our tunable metalens design, we employed top-down electron beam (E-beam) lithography. As material substrate we used a commercially available free-standing crystalline (100) silicon membrane from Norcada Inc. We spin-coated the membrane sample with the AR-P 6200.04 positive e-beam resist with a thickness of 230 nm followed by baking for 1 min at 150 °C. Afterward, E-beam exposure was carried out followed by one and a half minutes of development in an AR 600-546 developer at room temperature. We then etched the silicon membrane using HBr chemistry with an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etcher. Finally, we stripped off the photoresist with an oxygen plasma etcher. Figure 3 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the final metalens with a diameter D = 100 μm and designed focal length f = 300 μm.
We characterized the fabricated metalens using a homemade two-color optical setup (see Figure S2 of the Supporting Information). Collimated probe and pump beams are linearly polarized. The pump beam passes through a combination of an electro opto modulator (EOM), a polarizing beam splitter and a half-wave plate to control the power and polarization of the pump beam. Afterward, both beams were recombined on a 50:50 beam splitter. A 20× objective lens and numerical aperture (NA) = 0.4 focuses the probe and pump beam to a focal spot of 100 and 60 μm onto the metalens. A second identical objective mounted on a piezoelectric stage collects the light after the metalens. A band-pass filter with central frequency of 1.31 μm blocks the pump while allowing the probe to reach a near-infrared (NIR) camera and a photodiode. We acquired an image stack of 2D intensity maps along the principle optical axis with a step size of ∼1 μm by moving the collection objective with the piezo stage. First, we characterized the lens response in the absence of the pump beam. Figure 4a,b shows the 2D intensity map without pump (Ip = 0 μW/μm2) in the xz-plane (longitudinal) and at the focal plane (transversal), respectively. For the sake of space, we only present the axial intensity profile along the xz-plane. However, the focal length evolution is similar in the yz-plane, as the metalens confines the light in both x- and y-directions (see Figure 4b). The measured focal length is f = 328 ± 0.3 μm. We also measured the transmission efficiency of the metalens in terms of the focused probe intensity as a fraction of the incident probe beam intensity to ∼47%. Subsequently, we switched on the pump beam (intensity Ip = 110 μW/μm2) and observed a reduction of the focal length by Δf = −20 μm. The 2D intensity maps (longitudinal and transversal) are displayed in Figure 4c,d. For further comparison, we plot the focus profile (z-cut) and 1D focal spot profile with and without pump laser in Figure 4e,f, respectively. It is noteworthy that the focusing quality and the full width at half-maximum (fwhm) value is well-preserved upon the introduction of the pump laser. Furthermore, the involved pump intensities are compatible with light-emitting diode (LED) arrays, thus eliminating the need for a bulky laser source.
Although our metalens was optimized for x-polarized pump light, we also characterized the metalens under y-polarized pump light and found a focal change Δf = −6 μm for the pump intensity Ip = 110 μW/μm2 (see Figure S3 in Supporting Information). This is consistent with numerical simulations shown in Figure S4b, which reveal that, under y-polarization, the effect of the pump on the beam becomes negligible, and, in contrast to the x-polarized case, the force on the disk is along the propagation direction.
When sweeping the pump intensity Ip from 0 to 110 μW/μm2, we observed a linear power dependence of the focal distance (Figure 5a). Another important parameter that characterizes the performance of a metalens is the focusing efficiency (FE), defined as the fraction of the transmitted power concentrated within an aperture of radius three times the fwhm of the focal spot at the respective focal plane of the metalens.47 We experimentally measured the FE for increasing Ip and observed a reduction from 78% (for Ip = 0 μW/μm2) to 68% (for Ip = 110 μW/μm2) as depicted in Figure 5a (blue circular dots).
Finally, we are interested in the switching dynamics of our optomechanically reconfigurable metalens. To measure its time response, we modulated the pump beam through the EOM with a square wave of frequency 0.5 Hz and amplitude 110 μW/μm2. The switching on rise time (10–90%) and switching off fall time (90–10%) of the EOM is limited to 14 μs. Figure 5b,c shows the time response of both the pump (red solid curve) and the metalens (blue solid line). We fit a sigmoid function to the data (black solid line for the metalens and gray dashed line for the pump) to obtain the rise and fall times. Our measurements give a rise time Δtrise = 17 μs (10% to 90%) and fall time Δtfall = 18 μs (90% to 10%) for the metalens highlighted by yellow shaded area in Figure 5b,c, respectively. From these values, we rule out that thermal effects dominate in the tunability of our lens. This conclusion is corroborated by the switching time calculated by Zhang et al.37
In conclusion, we proposed and realized an ultrathin varifocal metalens actuated by optomechanical control, which combines significant tunability with 10 μs response time. While the system was optimized to operate in the NIR region of the spectrum, extension to the visible frequency range could be achieved through an appropriate adjustment of the meta-atoms parameters and choice of their constitutive material. We foresee that future development of optomechanical integrated reconfigurable metalenses and other metasurface-based functionalities would greatly benefit from advanced mode engineering (exploiting for instance quasi bound states in the continuum), engineering the internal residual stress and exploiting the mechanical resonance frequencies of the system.
Acknowledgments
Adeel Afridi acknowledges financial support from the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Co-funding Programme (COFUND-DP, H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2014, GA No. 665884).
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04105.
Additional figures, references, and discussion (ZIP)
Numerical simulations (optical and thermal) of meta-atoms, optical force calculation, meta-atom library, optical setup for characterization of metalens, metalens performance under y-polarization pump, optical forces and actuation under y-polarized pump, meta-atom actuation as increasing beam length and characterization of structural anisotropy (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Kildishev A. V.; Boltasseva A.; Shalaev V. M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 2013, 339, 1232009. 10.1126/science.1232009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu N.; Capasso F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 139–150. 10.1038/nmat3839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genevet P.; Capasso F.; Aieta F.; Khorasaninejad M.; Devlin R. Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces. Optica 2017, 4, 139–152. 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu N.; Genevet P.; Kats M. A.; Aieta F.; Tetienne J. P.; Capasso F.; Gaburro Z. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: Generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 2011, 334, 333–337. 10.1126/science.1210713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khorasaninejad M.; Capasso F. Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic components. Science 2017, 358, eaam8100 10.1126/science.aam8100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- She A.; Zhang S.; Shian S.; Clarke D. R.; Capasso F. Adaptive metalenses with simultaneous electrical control of focal length, astigmatism, and shift. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaap9957 10.1126/sciadv.aap9957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moon S.-W.; Kim Y.; Yoon G.; Rho J. Recent progress on ultrathin metalenses for flat optics. Iscience 2020, 23, 101877. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D.; Gwak J.; Badloe T.; Palomba S.; Rho J. Metasurfaces-based imaging and applications: from miniaturized optical components to functional imaging platforms. Nanoscale Advances 2020, 2, 605–625. 10.1039/C9NA00751B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khorasaninejad M.; Chen W. T.; Devlin R. C.; Oh J.; Zhu A. Y.; Capasso F. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science 2016, 352, 1190–1194. 10.1126/science.aaf6644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalanne P.; Chavel P. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: past, present, perspectives. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2017, 11, 1600295. 10.1002/lpor.201600295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tseng M. L.; Hsiao H.-H.; Chu C. H.; Chen M. K.; Sun G.; Liu A.-Q.; Tsai D. P. Metalenses: advances and applications. Advanced Optical Materials 2018, 6, 1800554. 10.1002/adom.201800554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bosch M.; Shcherbakov M. R.; Won K.; Lee H. S.; Kim Y.; Shvets G. Electrically Actuated Varifocal Lens Based on Liquid-Crystal-Embedded Dielectric Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 3849–3856. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ee H. S.; Agarwal R. Tunable Metasurface and Flat Optical Zoom Lens on a Stretchable Substrate. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2818–2823. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamali S. M.; Arbabi E.; Arbabi A.; Horie Y.; Faraon A. Highly tunable elastic dielectric metasurface lenses. Laser and Photonics Reviews 2016, 10, 1002–1008. 10.1002/lpor.201600144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Arbabi E.; Arbabi A.; Kamali S. M.; Horie Y.; Faraji-Dana M.; Faraon A. MEMS-tunable dielectric metasurface lens. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–9. 10.1038/s41467-018-03155-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Z.; Zhou S.; Li X.; Ge S.; Chen P.; Hu W.; Lu Y. Liquid crystal integrated metalens with tunable chromatic aberration. Advanced Photonics 2020, 2, 036002. 10.1117/1.AP.2.3.036002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fan C.-Y.; Chuang T.-J.; Wu K.-H.; Su G.-D. J. Electrically modulated varifocal metalens combined with twisted nematic liquid crystals. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 10609. 10.1364/OE.386563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Badloe T.; Kim I.; Kim Y.; Kim J.; Rho J. Electrically tunable bifocal metalens with diffraction-limited focusing and imaging at visible wavelengths. Advanced Science 2021, 8, 2102646. 10.1002/advs.202102646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Archetti A.; Lin R.-J.; Restori N.; Kiani F.; Tsoulos T. V.; Tagliabue G. Thermally reconfigurable metalens. Nanophotonics 2022, 11 (17), 3969–3980. 10.1515/nanoph-2022-0147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Afridi A.; Canet-Ferrer J.; Philippet L.; Osmond J.; Berto P.; Quidant R. Electrically Driven Varifocal Silicon Metalens. ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 4497–4503. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yao B.; Zang X.; Zhu Y.; Yu D.; Xie J.; Chen L.; Han S.; Zhu Y.; Zhuang S. Spin-decoupled metalens with intensity-tunable multiple focal points. Photonics Research 2021, 9, 1019. 10.1364/PRJ.420665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang W.; Kang C.; Liu X.; Qu S. Spin-selected and spin-independent dielectric metalenses. Journal of Optics 2018, 20, 095102. 10.1088/2040-8986/aad6fd. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Groever B.; Rubin N. A.; Mueller J.; Devlin R. C.; Capasso F. High-efficiency chiral meta-lens. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–6. 10.1038/s41598-018-25675-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu R.; Li Z.; Zheng G.; Chen M.; Yang Y.; Tao J.; Wu L.; Deng Q. Reconfigurable step-zoom metalens without optical and mechanical compensations. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 12221. 10.1364/OE.27.012221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu L.; Fan Y.; Wang Y.; Zhang C.; Yang W.; Song Q.; Xiao S. Spin angular momentum controlled multifunctional all-dielectric metasurface doublet. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2020, 14, 1900324. 10.1002/lpor.201900324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shalaginov M. Y.; An S.; Zhang Y.; Yang F.; Su P.; Liberman V.; Chou J. B.; Roberts C. M.; Kang M.; Rios C.; et al. Reconfigurable all-dielectric metalens with diffraction-limited performance. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–8. 10.1038/s41467-021-21440-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikheeva E.; Kyrou C.; Bentata F.; Khadir S.; Cueff S.; Genevet P. Space and Time Modulations of Light with Metasurfaces: Recent Progress and Future Prospects. ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 1458–1482. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J.; Gurung S.; Bej S.; Ni P.; Howard Lee H. W. Active optical metasurfaces: comprehensive review on physics, mechanisms, and prospective applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2022, 85, 036101. 10.1088/1361-6633/ac2aaf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gartner C.; Moura J. P.; Haaxman W.; Norte R. A.; Groblacher S. Integrated optomechanical arrays of two high reflectivity SiN membranes. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 7171–7175. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moura J. P.; Norte R. A.; Guo J.; Schäfermeier C.; Gröblacher S. Centimeter-scale suspended photonic crystal mirrors. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 1895–1909. 10.1364/OE.26.001895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgwal R.; Pino J. d.; Verhagen E. Comparing nonlinear optomechanical coupling in membrane-in-the-middle and single-cavity systems. New J. Phys. 2020, 22, 113006. 10.1088/1367-2630/abc1c8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- La Gala G.; P Mathew J.; Neveu P.; Verhagen E. Nanomechanical design strategy for single-mode optomechanical measurement. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2022, 55, 225101. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac569d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Norte R. A.; Moura J. P.; Gröblacher S. Mechanical resonators for quantum optomechanics experiments at room temperature. Physical review letters 2016, 116, 147202. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.147202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu H.; Yi F.; Cubukcu E. Plasmonic metamaterial absorber for broadband manipulation of mechanical resonances. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 709–714. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zanotto S.; Tredicucci A.; Navarro-Urrios D.; Cecchini M.; Biasiol G.; Mencarelli D.; Pierantoni L.; Pitanti A. Optomechanics of chiral dielectric metasurfaces. Advanced Optical Materials 2020, 8, 1901507. 10.1002/adom.201901507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zheludev N. I.; Plum E. Reconfigurable nanomechanical photonic metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 16–22. 10.1038/nnano.2015.302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J.; MacDonald K. F.; Zheludev N. I. Nonlinear dielectric optomechanical metamaterials. Light: Science & Applications 2013, 2, e96–e96. 10.1038/lsa.2013.52. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karvounis A.; Ou J. Y.; Wu W.; Macdonald K. F.; Zheludev N. I. Nano-optomechanical nonlinear dielectric metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 191110. 10.1063/1.4935795. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ou J.-Y.; Plum E.; Zheludev N. I. Optical addressing of nanomechanical metamaterials with subwavelength resolution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 081104. 10.1063/1.5036966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ajia I. A.; Ou J. Y.; Dinsdale N. J.; Singh H. J.; Chen-Sverre T.; Liu T.; Zheludev N. I.; Muskens O. L. Gigahertz Nano-Optomechanical Resonances in a Dielectric SiC-Membrane Metasurface Array. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 4563–4569. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sang Y.; Xu J.; Liu K.; Chen W.; Xiao Y.; Zhu Z.; Liu N.; Zhang J. Spatial Nonreciprocal Transmission and Optical Bistability Based on Millimeter-Scale Suspended Metasurface. Advanced Optical Materials 2022, 10, 2201523. 10.1002/adom.202201523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Decker M.; Staude I.; Falkner M.; Dominguez J.; Neshev D. N.; Brener I.; Pertsch T.; Kivshar Y. S. High-efficiency dielectric Huygens’ surfaces. Advanced Optical Materials 2015, 3, 813–820. 10.1002/adom.201400584. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y. F.; Zhu A. Y.; Paniagua-Domínguez R.; Fu Y. H.; Luk’yanchuk B.; Kuznetsov A. I. High-transmission dielectric metasurface with 2π phase control at visible wavelengths. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2015, 9, 412–418. 10.1002/lpor.201500041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Middelmann T.; Walkov A.; Bartl G.; Schödel R. Thermal expansion coefficient of single-crystal silicon from 7 to 293 K. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 174113. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe H.; Yamada N.; Okaji M. Development of a laser interferometric dilatometer for measurements of thermal expansion of solids in the temperature range 300 to 1300 K. Int. J. Thermophys. 2002, 23, 543–554. 10.1023/A:1015117704933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe H.; Yamada N.; Okaji M. Linear thermal expansion coefficient of silicon from 293 to 1000 K. Int. J. Thermophys. 2004, 25, 221–236. 10.1023/B:IJOT.0000022336.83719.43. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lin H.; Xu Z.-Q.; Cao G.; Zhang Y.; Zhou J.; Wang Z.; Wan Z.; Liu Z.; Loh K. P.; Qiu C.-W.; et al. Diffraction-limited imaging with monolayer 2D material-based ultrathin flat lenses. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 1–11. 10.1038/s41377-020-00374-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.