Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 1996 Dec;55(12):901–906. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.12.901

Development of a functional scoring system for rheumatoid arthritis patients with cervical myelopathy.

A T Casey 1, J M Bland 1, H A Crockard 1
PMCID: PMC1010342  PMID: 9014584

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To be able to measure disability objectively in rheumatoid arthritis complicated by cervical myelopathy. METHODS: The responses to the Stanford health assessment questionnaire disability index were recorded from 250 consecutive patients (group 1) referred to our unit for spinal surgery. Using principal components analysis the questionnaire was reduced from 20 questions to 10 questions. In the second part of the study, the results of the questionnaire for those patients undergoing surgery from the original group of 250 patients were analysed with respect to outcome. RESULTS: The reduction in the number of questions results in no significant loss of information, reliability (internal consistency Cronbach's alpha = 0.968) or sensitivity. The new scale, the myelopathy disability index, measures only one dimension (Eigen value 6.97) and may be more finely tuned to the measurement of disability in these myelopathic patients. When administered to the 194 patients undergoing cervical spine (group 2) surgery the myelopathy disability index was an accurate predictor of neurological and functional outcome, as well as survival following surgery (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The myelopathy disability index provides a much needed objective and reliable means of assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid involvement of the cervical spine and also in predicting outcome following surgical intervention. It also provides information for both the patient and surgeon alike, on what to realistically expect from surgery. Its adoption should facilitate comparisons between different forms of surgical intervention.

Full text

PDF
901

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agarwal A. K., Peppelman W. C., Jr, Kraus D. R., Eisenbeis C. H., Jr The cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):79–80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boden S. D., Dodge L. D., Bohlman H. H., Rechtine G. R. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. A long-term analysis with predictors of paralysis and recovery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Sep;75(9):1282–1297. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199309000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CRONBACH L. J., MEEHL P. E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardiel M. H., Abello-Banfi M., Ruiz-Mercado R., Alarcon-Segovia D. How to measure health status in rheumatoid arthritis in non-English speaking patients: validation of a Spanish version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (Spanish HAQ-DI). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993 Mar-Apr;11(2):117–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daltroy L. H., Larson M. G., Roberts N. W., Liang M. H. A modification of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol. 1990 Jul;17(7):946–950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ekdahl C., Eberhardt K., Andersson S. I., Svensson B. Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol. 1988;17(4):263–271. doi: 10.3109/03009748809098795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fortin P. R., Stucki G., Katz J. N. Measuring relevant change: an emerging challenge in rheumatologic clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Aug;38(8):1027–1030. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frankel H. L., Hancock D. O., Hyslop G., Melzak J., Michaelis L. S., Ungar G. H., Vernon J. D., Walsh J. J. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia. 1969 Nov;7(3):179–192. doi: 10.1038/sc.1969.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fries J. F., Spitz P. W., Young D. Y. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):789–793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fries J. F., Spitz P., Kraines R. G., Holman H. R. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137–145. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardiner P. V., Sykes H. R., Hassey G. A., Walker D. J. An evaluation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire in long-term longitudinal follow-up of disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Aug;32(8):724–728. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/32.8.724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goeppinger J., Doyle M. A., Charlton S. L., Lorig K. A nursing perspective on the assessment of function in persons with arthritis. Res Nurs Health. 1988 Oct;11(5):321–331. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hawley D. J., Wolfe F. Sensitivity to change of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and other clinical and health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis: results of short-term clinical trials and observational studies versus long-term observational studies. Arthritis Care Res. 1992 Sep;5(3):130–136. doi: 10.1002/art.1790050304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirabayashi K., Watanabe K., Wakano K., Suzuki N., Satomi K., Ishii Y. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983 Oct;8(7):693–699. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198310000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huskisson E. C. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127–1131. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KATZ S., FORD A. B., MOSKOWITZ R. W., JACKSON B. A., JAFFE M. W. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kauppi M., Hakala M. Prevalence of cervical spine subluxations and dislocations in a community-based rheumatoid arthritis population. Scand J Rheumatol. 1994;23(3):133–136. doi: 10.3109/03009749409103045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirwan J. R., Reeback J. S. Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire modified to assess disability in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1986 May;25(2):206–209. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/25.2.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Leigh J. P., Fries J. F. Predictors of disability in a longitudinal sample of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 May;51(5):581–587. doi: 10.1136/ard.51.5.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liang M. H., Fossel A. H., Larson M. G. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990 Jul;28(7):632–642. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liang M. H., Larson M. G., Cullen K. E., Schwartz J. A. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 May;28(5):542–547. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95(1):87–100. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pincus T., Summey J. A., Soraci S. A., Jr, Wallston K. A., Hummon N. P. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 1983 Nov;26(11):1346–1353. doi: 10.1002/art.1780261107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ranawat C. S., O'Leary P., Pellicci P., Tsairis P., Marchisello P., Dorr L. Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Oct;61(7):1003–1010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Redlund-Johnell I., Pettersson H. Radiographic measurements of the cranio-vertebral region. Designed for evaluation of abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1984;25(1):23–28. doi: 10.1177/028418518402500105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vogel H. P. Influence of additional information on interrater reliability in the neurologic examination. Neurology. 1992 Nov;42(11):2076–2081. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.11.2076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Weissman B. N., Aliabadi P., Weinfeld M. S., Thomas W. H., Sosman J. L. Prognostic features of atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Radiology. 1982 Sep;144(4):745–751. doi: 10.1148/radiology.144.4.7111719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van der Heide A., Jacobs J. W., Bijlsma J. W. An evaluation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) in a long-term longitudinal follow-up of disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Feb;33(2):195–197. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.2.195-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES