Abstract
The general consensus is that increases in neuronal activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) contribute to pain’s negative affect. Here, using in vivo imaging of neuronal calcium dynamics in mice, we report that nitrous oxide, a general anesthetic that reduces pain affect, paradoxically, increases ACC spontaneous activity. As expected, a noxious stimulus also increased ACC activity. However, as nitrous oxide increases baseline activity, the relative change in activity from pre-stimulus baseline was significantly less than the change in the absence of the general anesthetic. We suggest that this relative change in activity represents a neural signature of the affective pain experience. Furthermore, this signature of pain persists under general anesthesia induced by isoflurane, at concentrations in which the mouse is unresponsive. We suggest that this signature underlies the phenomenon of connected consciousness, in which use of the isolated forelimb technique revealed that pain percepts can persist in anesthetized patients.
General anesthetics are potent regulators of pain processing and can produce effects ranging from diminished or absent pain perception (i.e., analgesia1–4) to the total abolition of reflexive responses to ongoing surgical stimuli2,5. Importantly, pain is a conscious, multidimensional percept that includes both sensory-discriminative (modality, location, intensity) and affective-motivational (unpleasantness) features6. Studies in awake, responsive patients inhaling nitrous oxide, a general anesthetic gas with analgesic properties1,7,8, report a preferential reduction of the affective-motivational aspects of pain9,10. Currently, however, there is limited information as to the neural mechanisms that underlie the ability of nitrous oxide to modulate affective-motivational aspects of pain.
The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is critical to processing the affective-motivational features of the pain percept11. In humans, primates, and rodents, ACC neurons respond to noxious, but not innocuous, thermal and mechanical stimuli12–15. Human neuroimaging studies have shown that increased ratings of the unpleasantness of pain correlate with increased ACC activity, and that analgesia correlates with decreased ACC activity11,16. Interestingly, after targeted ACC manipulations, including ablations17–19 or deep brain stimulation20,21, patients still sense noxious stimuli, but report that the stimuli are less painful or less “bothersome”. Consistent with clinical findings, ablative22,23 or pharmacological24–26 manipulations of the ACC in rodents produced selective reduction in affective-motivational responses to pain without influencing sensory thresholds22–32. Importantly, these studies led to the conclusion that inhibition22–24 of the ACC is critical to generating pain control and that excitation25,33–35 produces increased pain aversion.
Unexpectedly, and indeed paradoxically given the general consensus6,36, cerebral blood flow and metabolism-based measurements of neural activity report that nitrous oxide increases activity in frontal cortical regions37, and in particular in the ACC38. However, because nitrous oxide has a strong vasodilatory effect that confounds interpretations of data from neuroimaging studies39,40, these findings are controversial. If true, these studies would suggest that increases in ACC activity do not necessarily lead to increased pain aversion and may even contribute to the analgesic effects of nitrous oxide. To date, however, there have been no direct measurements (electrophysiology or in vivo calcium imaging) of neural activity in the ACC during inhalation of nitrous oxide.
In this present work, using in vivo imaging of the calcium dynamics of ACC neurons in mice, we report that nitrous oxide, in fact, produces profound increases in ACC activity. Furthermore, in studies of molecularly distinct subsets of cortical neurons, we discovered that nitrous oxide preferentially activates excitatory ACC neurons, with limited actions on inhibitory interneurons. In behavioral studies, we confirmed that nitrous oxide produces a potent analgesia that preferentially diminishes affective-motivational pain endpoints. In awake, freely moving mice, we demonstrated that by increasing spontaneous ACC activity, nitrous oxide reduces the relative magnitude of noxious stimulus-induced ACC activation. Importantly, this reduction in noxious stimulus-evoked ACC activation correlates with nitrous oxide-induced reductions in affective-motivational behaviors, but not reflexive behaviors. Lastly, using these changes in ACC as a neural biomarker for affective-motivational aspects of pain, we demonstrate the presence of neural signatures of pain even in an isoflurane-anesthetized, behaviorally unresponsive mouse.
RESULTS
Nitrous oxide induces paradoxical increases in ACC activity
We used head-mounted miniature microscopes41,42 to monitor the calcium dynamics43 of individually identified ACC neurons during exposure to nitrous oxide or control gas (oxygen) (Fig. 1A, B, Fig. S1). Across the two separate exposures, we identified 1,364 neurons (nitrous oxide: 795, oxygen: 569). Consistently, we found that inhalation of nitrous oxide drove sustained and significant increases in spontaneous ACC activity (Fig. 1C, Supplemental Video 1).
Next, we used clustering to identify distinct activity patterns that occur during inhalation of nitrous oxide or control gas. Dimensionality reduction of neural activity patterns using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) reveals that neural activity patterns during inhalation of nitrous oxide are highly divergent and largely nonoverlapping with those observed during inhalation of control gas (Fig. 1D and E). Density-based spatial clustering after tSNE analysis identified 4 unique clusters of activity (Fig. 1D and F). Neurons identified during nitrous oxide recordings predominately populated clusters defined by large increases in activity (Fig. 1F: clusters 1, 2). Neurons from control gas recordings are largely confined to clusters with minimal activity changes (Fig. 1F: cluster 3) or slightly decreased activity (Fig. 1F: cluster 4). Thus, in sharp contrast to the established literature, we conclude that increased ACC activity can occur during inhalation of a known analgesic.
Nitrous oxide preferentially activates excitatory ACC neurons in cortical layer 2/3
Cortical circuits are comprised of functionally distinct neurons with unique molecular identities that underlie cortical information processing44–51. Using a combinatorial viral/genetic strategy that enables the selective expression of genetically encoded calcium indicators within specific cell types, we monitored the activity of principal (excitatory) neurons (vGluT2 expressing; VG2), and molecularly distinct subpopulations of cortical inhibitory interneurons that express parvalbumin (PV), somatostatin (SST), or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) (Fig. 2A, B). During separate exposures to nitrous oxide or control gas (oxygen) (Fig. S1), we identified 1,771 neurons (by subtype: VG2: 846, PV: 296, SST: 260, VIP: 369; by gas: nitrous oxide: 1049, oxygen: 722).
Figures 2C and S2 show that compared to oxygen, nitrous oxide preferentially activated excitatory neurons. Although we do observe PV-, SST-, and VIP-expressing interneurons with increased activity (Fig. 2D), the proportion of neurons with increased activity did not differ between oxygen and nitrous oxide (Fig. 2C and Fig. S2). An assessment of the recruitment of subtypes of neurons to clusters with distinct activity profiles confirmed that excitatory, but not inhibitory (PV, SST, VIP), neurons are preferentially recruited to clusters with increased activity (Fig. 2E and F: clusters 1 and 2).
Next, to provide a surrogate of overall neuronal activity in the ACC, we immunolabeled for Fos protein (Fig. 3A), a molecular marker of recently activated neurons52. Paralleling our calcium imaging observations (Fig. 1), we found that nitrous oxide increased Fos expression compared to air (Fig. 3B and C). Figure 3D further shows that the increased Fos expression was particularly pronounced in cortical layers 2/3 compared to other layers. Also consistent with the recordings, we found a very small, albeit significant increase, from 3 to 6%, in Fos double-labeling of inhibitory interneurons (GAD67-GFP+). This result indicates that the increased Fos expression observed in layer 2/3 is largely due to activation of excitatory neurons. We conclude that nitrous oxide preferentially activates excitatory neurons in the ACC, effects that we hypothesize profoundly alter the experience of pain.
Nitrous oxide reduces affective-motivational pain-related behaviors
Mice produce complex nocifensive behaviors to noxious stimuli. As noted above, alterations in ACC activity are postulated to influence affective-motivational, but not reflexive, responses to noxious stimuli. Here, we asked whether nitrous oxide-induced changes in ACC activity translate to preferential reduction of affective-motivational, rather than reflexive, indices of pain. In these studies, we compared the effects of nitrous oxide inhalation on the production of reflexive versus affective-motivational behaviors during presentation of a noxious stimulus (Fig. 4A and B).
While mice inhaled nitrous oxide (60%) or control gas (air), we generated brief, noxious heat stimuli using infrared laser pulses targeted to the hindpaw. The laser stimulus produced robust nocifensive responses in mice, including withdrawals, shakes, and licks53 (Fig. 4B, Supplemental Video 2). Importantly, in rodents, licking of the hindpaw following a noxious stimulus is an affective-motivational response indicative of the experience of pain27,54–56, not merely a reflexive response, as is the case for withdrawals and shakes55,57,58. Figure 4C shows that nitrous oxide produces a potent suppression of affective-motivational measures of pain. Indeed, nitrous oxide almost completely abolished laser-evoked licks. In contrast, reflexive behaviors are minimally affected by nitrous oxide (Fig. 4C).
In mice, a single laser stimulus often evokes multiple concurrent behaviors, with the production of licks usually coupled to reflexive behaviors (i.e., withdrawals and shakes). Nitrous oxide dramatically reduced this coupling, with laser-evoked reflexes producing proportionally fewer concurrent licks (Fig. 4D). Taken together, we conclude that the reduction of affective-motivational behaviors produced by nitrous oxide is independent of any effects on reflexive behaviors.
Nitrous oxide-induced analgesia correlates with noxious stimulus-evoked ACC activity
Next, we investigated how paradoxical, nitrous oxide-induced increases in spontaneous ACC activity translate to an analgesic effect in response to a noxious stimulus. We hypothesized that nitrous oxide-induced increases in ACC activity create a ceiling effect, thereby attenuating the relative magnitude of noxious stimulus-evoked changes, which results in a diminished experience of pain. To test this hypothesis, we imaged neural activity in ACC neurons during inhalation of nitrous oxide (60%) or control gas (air) with concurrent delivery of the laser stimulus (Fig. 4E, Supplemental Video 3). Given our finding that nitrous oxide predominantly increases activity in excitatory neurons of the ACC, here we used a viral approach to monitor activity exclusively in excitatory neurons (Fig. 4E). Across the nitrous oxide and air exposures, we identified 1402 neurons (nitrous oxide: 825, air: 577).
During presentation of the laser stimulus, we found that noxious stimulus responsive ACC neurons accounted for 31.8±2.5% of the total population in the air condition and 23.4±3.0% under nitrous oxide (Fig. 4F, J). In agreement with the findings described above, nitrous oxide significantly increased the pre-stimulus baseline event rate compared to air (Fig. 4G and I). Interestingly, and as would be expected for a ceiling effect, we observed no difference in the absolute magnitude of laser-evoked activity between nitrous oxide and air conditions (Fig. 4G and I). However, when measures of noxious stimulus-evoked activity were normalized to pre-stimulus baseline activity there was a clear reduction in the nitrous oxide exposure as compared to air (Fig. 4H and I). In other words, nitrous oxide reduces the relative magnitude of noxious stimulus-evoked activity compared to air.
Importantly, the degree of laser-evoked licking behavior, but not reflexes, correlates not only with the relative magnitude of the laser-evoked maximum event rate, but also with the percentage of ACC neurons activated by the laser (Fig. 4I, J). These relationships suggest that noxious stimulus-evoked neural activity of the ACC can indeed be used as a proxy for the affective-motivational aspects of the pain experience in mice.
Neural signatures of pain are present during isoflurane-induced general anesthesia
To date, aside from directly asking patients to rate levels of ongoing pain, there is no neural biomarker that can be used as a proxy of the affective experience of pain. This lack of an adequate pain biomarker is particularly problematic during general anesthesia, where patients (and animals) are immobilized and thus behaviorally unresponsive and incapable of reporting their pain experience59. Rather disturbingly, clinical studies using the isolated forearm technique reveal that patients often report the experience pain under general anesthesia60,61. Fortunately, perhaps, the amnestic effects of general anesthetics largely render them unable to recall such events postoperatively62. As nitrous oxide does not produce loss of behavioral responsiveness in mice under normal conditions (concentrations greater than 100% would be required), we could not determine whether there is persistent brain activity in a nitrous oxide anesthetized mouse. Therefore, we initiated studies using isoflurane, a widely used volatile anesthetic that readily produces general anesthesia. Our specific question is whether there can be persistent ACC activity consistent with the experience of pain in an otherwise anesthetized, behaviorally unresponsive mouse.
We first assessed the influence of isoflurane on the spontaneous activity of ACC neurons. In contrast to changes recorded during nitrous oxide inhalation, we found that isoflurane decreased spontaneous ACC activity in a dose-dependent manner, and completely abolished ACC activity at the highest concentrations (Supplemental Video 4).
We then assessed noxious stimulus-evoked ACC activity in isoflurane-anesthetized mice. As expected, mice tested at 2% isoflurane, a concentration where nociceptive reflexes withdrawals are abolished, we observed a complete absence of spontaneous and evoked activity.
Next, we tested mice during inhalation of 1% isoflurane in air, a concentration where mice are immobilized and lack righting reflexes (a rodent measure of awareness), yet still retain neural activity (Fig. 5A and B). Although laser stimulation increased the activity of ACC neurons in both air and 1% isoflurane conditions (Fig. 5C), we recorded significantly fewer laser responsive neurons under isoflurane (Fig. 5G). However, we found no significant differences between baseline or laser-evoked ACC activity (i.e., event rate-based) measurements (Fig. 5E, F, G).
Lastly, using the relationship between noxious stimulus-evoked ACC activity and the generation of affective-motivational behaviors (licks) recorded in nitrous oxide and air exposed mice (Supplemental Fig. 3), we assessed the presence of neural activity patterns indicative of an affective-motivational pain experience in isoflurane-anesthetized mice. Surprisingly, noxious stimulus-evoked ACC activity during inhalation of 1% isoflurane, when mice could not perform licks due to isoflurane-induced immobilization, not only persists, but is consistent with the experience of pain (Fig. 5H). We conclude that a brain signature of affective-motivational aspects of the pain experience can be preserved under general anesthesia.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we explored the influence of nitrous oxide, an inhalational anesthetic with analgesic properties, on neural activity of the ACC, a cortical region that is a major contributor to the affective-motivational aspects of pain6. In contrast to the prevailing view, namely that inhibition of the ACC reduces pain affect22–24, we discovered that nitrous oxide profoundly increases spontaneous ACC neuronal activity. Clearly, our results present a paradox: how is it that nitrous oxide increases spontaneous ACC activity and produces analgesia, but does not, as the literature would predict, increase affective-motivational indices of pain. Unexpectedly, we discovered that the absolute magnitude ACC activity provoked by a noxious stimulus did not differ between nitrous oxide and air, even though nitrous oxide reduced measures of the affective pain experience. Rather, we demonstrate that it is the relative magnitude of noxious stimulus-evoked ACC activity, as compared to activity immediately prior to the stimulus, that best correlates with the production of affective-motivational pain behaviors. In essence, what underlies the affective-motivational aspects of pain by the ACC is a circuit mechanism of gain control63, namely one that adjusts the signal-to-noise ratio of stimulus-evoked ACC neuronal activity64. In this model, spontaneous activity (i.e., noise) can be tuned, for example, by nitrous oxide, to modulate the relative change of activity provoked by a noxious stimulus (i.e., signal). Based on our findings, we conclude that increased activity per se is not necessarily indicative of a pain experience. Rather, it is the change in between resting (spontaneous) ACC activity and that evoked by a noxious stimulus (e.g., laser or surgical intervention) that determines whether there is pain affect. Of course, this conclusion is consistent with the fact that despite ongoing activity in the naïve mouse (and human), there is no pain affect until the introduction of a noxious stimulus.
Unclear is the mechanism underlying the selective increase in the activity of excitatory ACC neurons by nitrous oxide, purportedly a non-competitive inhibitor of the NMDA receptor65. Although one would expect that blocking NMDA receptors would decrease neuronal activity, previous recordings in the prefrontal cortex reported that selective NMDA receptor antagonists, in fact, increase excitatory neuronal activity, not directly, but by decreasing the activity of inhibitory interneurons66. As we did not observe decreases in inhibitory interneuron activity, we suggest that nitrous oxide’s effects on the ACC involve alternative mechanisms65. For example, nitrous oxide could influence ACC neuronal activity via direct actions on upstream brain regions67, such as medial-dorsal thalamus or basolateral amygdala68.
Also unclear are the direct downstream consequences of nitrous oxide-induced increases in ACC activity, and how this translates to behavioral analgesia in tests of pain affect. The ACC is a major hub that is highly connected to other elements of the so-called “pain matrix”69. Thus, nitrous oxide-induced activation of ACC projection neurons would produce wide-ranging effects on other components of the matrix70, thereby altering the experience of pain. Other studies reported that nitrous oxide analgesia is naloxone reversible65. In ongoing studies we are examining whether the downstream circuits engaged by the ACC contribute to the naloxone-reversible aspects of nitrous oxide-induced analgesia, potentially by direct actions on endorphin-mediated inhibitory controls71,72.
Particularly surprising was the persistence of noxious stimulus-evoked activity in the ACC of isoflurane-anesthetized mice, at concentrations that blocked behavioral indices of pain affect, namely, licking in response to a noxious stimulus. As this activity was comparable to that recorded in awake mice, we suggest that it represents a neural biomarker, in effect a surrogate pain index that is specific for the affective component of the pain experience. In other words, the brain can “experience” pain even under general anesthesia, an interpretation consistent with provocative clinical reports of the high prevalence of an intraoperative experience of pain in patients60–62,73 under general anesthesia. These patients can communicate their pain experience in real time through the isolated forearm technique59–61, a phenomenon known as connected consciousness59.
Importantly, it is possible to establish a level of general anesthesia in which connected consciousness does not occur74. In fact, when we increased the depth of anesthesia using 2% isoflurane and then tested the mice, not only was there no behavioral response to a noxious stimulus, but we observed that both spontaneous and evoked ACC activity were abolished. This absence of activity at the deepest levels of anesthesia75 creates, in essence, a functional “ablation” of the ACC, which blocks the experience of pain much in the same way that a physical lesion of the ACC provides pain relief in patients17. However, although similarly deep levels of general anesthesia (measured by EEG) can ensure the absence of connected consciousness74, the associated increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes (death, stroke, postoperative delirium)76 likely outweigh any potential benefits. For this reason, our findings are particularly relevant to ongoing efforts to develop neural activity-based biomarkers that can reliably document adequate analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia77, which, in turn, will support the development of novel general anesthetics that can safely block the experience of pain.
METHODS
Animal husbandry
All mouse husbandry and surgical procedures adhered to the regulatory standards of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California San Francisco (UCSF; protocol AN199730). The following mouse strains were used: vGluT2-IRES-Cre78 (Jax # 028863), PV-IRES-Cre79 (Jax #017320), SST-IRES-Cre80 (Jax # 028864), VIP-IRES-Cre80 (Jax # 031628), Ai75D (ROSA26-nls-tdTomato; Jax # 025106), and GAD67-GFP81. The health and wellbeing of the mice were monitored daily.
Calcium imaging of spontaneous ACC activity
GECI expression strategy
We used two strategies to express genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECI; GCaMP6f43) in neurons: (1) viral pan-neuronal expression, and (2) viral/genetic expression within molecular distinct subsets of neurons. For experiments with pan-neuronal expression, we delivered GCaMP6f under control of the synapsin promoter (AAV1/9-SYN-GCaMP6f; Addgene, #100837)51. The restricted delivery of GCaMP6f to molecularly distinct populations of neurons was achieved using the vGluT2-Cre78, PV-Cre79, SST-Cre80, or VIP-Cre80 mouse lines in combination with the Cre-inducible viral expression of GCaMP6f in the ACC (AAV1/9-SYN-FLEX-GCaMP6f; Addgene, #100833).
Surgical preparation for ACC calcium imaging
Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (2% in oxygen) and placed on a stereotaxic frame (Kopf). After craniotomy above the left ACC (Bregma, x: −0.33mm, y:1.27mm), we injected virus (depth: −1.75mm), and chronically implanted a gradient index (GRIN) lens (0.5×4mm ProView, Inscopix; depth: −1.7mm). The GRIN lens and titanium headbar (custom made, eMachineShop.com) were affixed to the skull with dental cement (Metabond). Mice were provided with postoperative analgesia (carprofen and slow-release buprenorphine). One week after implantation surgery, under isoflurane anesthesia, a baseplate was affixed above the GRIN lens with dental cement. To provide time for sufficient GCaMP6f expression, mice recovered for 3 to 4 weeks before experiments began.
Behavioral apparatus and anesthesia delivery
Mice were headfixed to a passive treadmill82, which was modified to provide heating that kept the mice isothermic during exposure to anesthesia, and then placed in a modified anesthetic induction chamber (VetEquip, 7L). Before the start of the experiment, the atmosphere of the chamber was replaced with oxygen. During experimental sessions, the mice were exposed to continually increasing concentrations of isoflurane or nitrous oxide, or for control conditions, continued exposure to oxygen. For all experiments, the concentration of oxygen never fell below 21%. Isoflurane was delivered via an Isoflurane Vaporizer (DRE Veterinary). Gas concentrations were monitored by a Datex Ohmeda S/5 anesthesia patient monitor and recorded by VSCapture software.
Calcium imaging and behavior monitoring
Changes in GCaMP6f fluorescence were captured with Inscopix miniscopes (nVista 3.0 or nVoke 2.0) at 20 frames per second (fps). Imaging parameters (excitation LED power, digital gain, and focus depth) were individually set for each mouse. Calcium imaging data were recorded via Inscopix Data Acquisition Software (IDAS), and recordings were triggered via TTL input. The behavior of the mouse was monitored with a Logitech webcam and recorded via ffmpeg software (https://ffmpeg.org/). Recording sessions were coordinated by Arduino/MATLAB, which triggered the start and end of data acquisition via miniscopes, ffmpeg, and VSCapture.
Tissue processing
After completion of the in vivo imaging experiments, the mice were anesthetized with Avertin (2.5% in saline) and transcardially perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then 4% formaldehyde (37% formaldehyde; Acros Organics, 11969–0100) diluted in PBS. Whole heads were postfixed in 4% formaldehyde at 4°C overnight, then brains were extracted from the skull and postfixed overnight at 4°C. Following postfixation, the brains were cryoprotected at 4°C overnight in 30% sucrose in PBS, and embedded in specimen matrix (Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound, Tissue-Tek) and stored at −80°C. Confocal microscopy confirmed GCaMP6f expression and proper GRIN lens targeting.
Assessing induction of immediate early genes by nitrous oxide
Fos induction
Adult GAD67-GFP mice (6–10 weeks old) were habituated to an anesthetic induction chamber (7L, VetEquip) for 30-minute sessions on 3 separate days. The following day, after an additional 30 minute habituation, the mice were exposed to 2L/minute of 60% nitrous oxide or medical air. After 2 hours, the mice were anesthetized with Avertin and transcardially perfused as described above. The brain was then removed, post-fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 4 hours at 4°C and then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, embedded in OCT, frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80°C.
Fos immunohistochemistry and confocal imaging
Frozen brains were coronally sectioned (30 microns) with a Hacker cryostat (Bright OTF series). ACC sections were slide mounted, washed with PBS (3 times for 5 minutes), and blocked with 10% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS for 1 hour. Slides were incubated overnight at room temperature in rabbit anti-Fos primary antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) diluted in PBS with 0.3% Triton-X and 1% NGS (PBST). Slides were then washed with PBS (3 times for 5 minutes), incubated in AlexaFluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen) diluted in PBST at room temperature for one hour, and washed again with PBS (3 times for 5 minutes). Sections were coated with mounting media (DAPI Fluoromount-G, Southern Biotech, #0100–20), and then coverslipped with #1.5 glass (Epredia, #152460). Fos immunofluorescence was captured via epifluorescent microscopy using a Zeiss Axio Zoom.V16. Colocalization of GAD67-GFP and Fos was captured by confocal microscopy using a Zeiss LSM980 Airyscan II microscope.
Fos image analysis and quantification
Fos expression was quantified using a thresholded z-scoring approach with custom-written MATLAB code. Briefly, we used the intensity values of pixels in cortical layer 1, which has minimal Fos expression, to set the mean and standard deviation for image z-scoring. The intensity of all pixels within an image were z-scored as: (Pixel intensity – mean background intensity)/(standard deviation of background intensity). Pixels within the ACC that have z-score values above 1.96 were considered Fos+. Double labeling of GAD67-GFP and Fos immunolabeling was quantified within ImageJ by a blind scorer.
Assessing noxious stimulus-evoked responses to infrared laser pulses
Behavioral apparatus and volatile anesthetic delivery
Mice were placed inside a modified anesthetic induction chamber (VetEquip, 2L) with a high-transmittance glass floor that allowed for the presentation of noxious heat stimuli during the concurrent inhalation of nitrous oxide. During experimental sessions, mice were exposed to nitrous oxide (60%) or control gas (medical air). We used subhypnotic concentrations of nitrous oxide that allowed awake, weightbearing mice to freely respond to noxious stimuli83, but below concentrations that induce unconsciousness (i.e., MACawake)84,85. The concentration of oxygen was held equivalent to atmospheric concentrations (21%) during nitrous oxide inhalation. Concentrations of nitrous oxide, oxygen, and carbon dioxide were monitored by a Datex Ohmeda S/5 anesthesia patient monitor and recorded using VSCapture software86. Individual mice were tested with different gasses during separate experimental sessions using a crossover study design with a minimum washout period of 7 days.
Generation of acute noxious thermal stimuli
Acute noxious thermal stimuli were generated using a fiber-attached infrared diode laser (LASMED (Lass-7M) 7W 975nm laser) that produced brief pulses that rapidly heat skin without causing injury53,87. Mice received 10 trials of laser stimuli, with one laser pulse per trial. The laser power and pulse duration were set to 1750mA and 300 milliseconds, respectively. During presentation of the laser stimulus, a focused beam (2.0mm, 1/e2 diameter) was shone on the central portion of the plantar surface of the hindpaw53. The laser stimulus was manually triggered via a footswitch and laser firing time was recorded via Arduino/MATLAB. Behavioral responses were recorded with a digital camera (Imaging Source, DMK 37BUX252) at 200 frames per second (fps) using StreamPix (Norpix) software.
Calcium imaging of noxious stimulus-evoked ACC activity
ACC calcium imaging preparation
Mice were prepared for calcium imaging as described above, with the following differences: (1) GCaMP6f was virally expressed in excitatory neurons using the CaMKIIa promotor (AAV1/9-CaMKIIa-GCaMP6f, Inscopix), (2) viral injection and implantation of an integrated GRIN lens/baseplate (0.5×4mm, Inscopix) occurred within a single surgery.
Calcium imaging and behavior monitoring
Changes in GCaMP6f fluorescence were monitored and noxious heat stimuli were generated as described above. For nitrous oxide recordings, anesthesia and behavioral monitoring were performed as for the laser experiments. For recordings under isoflurane anesthesia, mice were first tested during inhalation of air as described above. Then, mice were briefly anesthetized with 1.0% isoflurane within the recording chamber, and then moved from the chamber to a heating pad where isoflurane was administered via nosecone. Mice were equilibrated to isoflurane anesthesia for 30 minutes to ensure steady-state concentrations within the brain88 before testing resumed. This equilibration process was repeated for recordings conducted under 2% isoflurane. Miniscope recording, laser pulses and behavioral camera recording signals were coordinated via TTL pulse via Arduino/MATLAB and synchronized by monitoring TTL signals via Inscopix DAQ (data acquisition) box.
Data processing
Calcium imaging data processing
Calcium imaging data were processed with Inscopix Data Processing Software (IDPS), MATLAB-IDPS API, and custom MATLAB code. Briefly, raw videos are spatially cropped, downsampled (2X), and bandpass filtered89. Processed videos are then motion corrected, normalized (dF/F), and individual cells segmented using principal component analysis and independent component analysis (PCA/ICA)90. Cell segmentation is manually confirmed in the IDPS GIU for each identified cell. Changes in calcium fluorescence per cell are extracted, and individual calcium transients within a trace are extracted as events, using either event detection algorithm in IDPS or custom MATLAB code.
Calcium imaging data analysis
To demonstrate nitrous oxide-induced increases in spontaneous activity, we Z-score normalized the activity of each cell to the baseline event rate. For clustering analysis, z-scored neuronal activity was transformed by dimensional reduction using tSNE algorithm. Clusters of neurons with unique activity patterns were identified from the tSNE mapping using DBSCAN. For stimulus-evoked changes, activity was extracted from 10 separate presentations of the noxious laser stimulus. The timing of stimulus presentation was determined using laser-generated TTL pulses recorded via the Inscopix nVoke DAQ box. Pre-stimulus activity is the time from −5 to 0 seconds before the laser stimulus; post-stimulus activity is measured from 0 seconds to 5 seconds after the laser stimulus. Baseline event rate is the mean pre-stimulus event rate per neuron per mouse. The maximum event rate is the maximum post-stimulus event rate. Where noted, fold changes in measures of neural activity are calculated as post-stimulus activity divided by pre-stimulus activity. Fluorescence traces were used to calculate the percentage of neurons with stimulus-evoked activity. Traces were z-scored to pre-stimulus activity and considered to have evoked activity if the trace z-scored value was greater than 1.96 for the post-stimulus period. Stepwise linear regression with interaction effects was performed on data mean-centered to control gas condition (medical air only). A neural activity (biomarker)-based estimate of laser evoked licks that otherwise would occur in awake mice was predicted from ACC recordings in isoflurane anesthetized mice. The isoflurane data were mean-centered to the control gas (medical air), and a prediction was made using the linear regression model generated from nitrous oxide and air recordings.
Scoring of stimulus-evoked behaviors
We used custom MATLAB software to score behavioral videos (viewed at 1/5X speed). Behavioral responses to individual laser stimuli were categorized as: (a) no response, (b) reflexes, such as flinches (the stimulated hindpaw shifted position but did not leave the glass floor), withdrawals (the stimulated hindpaw is rapidly pulled off of the glass floor), or shakes (the stimulated hindpaw is moved in a repetitive oscillatory fashion), or (c) licks (the stimulated hindpaw is brought to the face and licked or bitten). Each video was scored independently by two individuals. All scorers were blind to experimental conditions.
Statistical analyses
Data were processed and analyzed in Mathwork’s MATLAB (R2020a) software. Statistical tests were performed with Prism (GraphPad) software. The threshold for significance for all statistical tests was set at p < 0.05, and indicators of significance levels were as follows: ns (not significant; p > 0.05); *= p < 0.05; **=p < 0.01; *** =p < 0.001; and ****= p < 0.0001. Corrections for multiple comparisons were performed using the false discovery rate method of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli, and noted within figure legends as “FDR corrected”.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was funded by NIH NSR35NS097306 (AIB), Open Philanthropy (AIB), NIGMS fellowship F32GM131479 (JAPW), and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Doctoral Foreign Study Award DFD-170771 (CDL). We are grateful to: Dr. Eric Lam (UCSF) for aiding in the design and fabrication of experimental setups; Dr. Philip Bickler (UCSF) for advice on experimental setup; Dr. Racheli Wercberger (UCSF) for helpful advice on calcium imaging and analyses; Dr. Chris Tsang (Inscopix) for initial training for surgical implant of GRIN lenses; Dr. Julian Motzkin (UCSF) for helpful discussions on data analysis and statistics.
REFERENCES
- 1.Davy H. Researches, Chemical and Philosophical; Chiefly Concerning Nitrous Oxide: Or Dephlogisticated Nitrous Air, and Its Respiration. 588 (1800). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Snow J. D. On the inhalation of the vapour of ether in surgical operations: Part I. in On the inhalation of the vapour of ether in surgical operations (John Churchill, 1847). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Coffey F. et al. STOP!: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane for the treatment of acute pain. Emerg. Med. J. 31, 613–618 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Olofsen E. et al. Ketamine psychedelic and antinociceptive effects are connected. Anesthesiology 136, 792–801 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Merkel G. & Eger E. I. A comparative study of halothane and halopropane anesthesia including method for determining equipotency. Anesthesiology 24, 346–357 (1963). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Basbaum A. I., Bautista D. M., Scherrer G. & Julius D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell 139, 267–284 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sanders R. D., Weimann J. & Maze M. Biologic effects of nitrous oxide: a mechanistic and toxicologic review. Anesthesiology 109, 707–722 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lew V., McKay E. & Maze M. Past, present, and future of nitrous oxide. Br. Med. Bull. 125, 103–119 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pirec V., Patterson T. H., Thapar P., Apfelbaum J. L. & Zacny J. P. Effects of subanesthetic concentrations of nitrous oxide on cold-pressor pain in humans. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 51, 323–329 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ramsay D. S., Brown A. C. & Woods S. C. Acute tolerance to nitrous oxide in humans. Pain 51, 367–373 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rainville P., Duncan G. H., Price D. D., Carrier B. & Bushnell M. C. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277, 968–971 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hutchison W. D., Davis K. D., Lozano A. M., Tasker R. R. & Dostrovsky J. O. Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 403–405 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kuo C.-C. & Yen C.-T. Comparison of anterior cingulate and primary somatosensory neuronal responses to noxious laser-heat stimuli in conscious, behaving rats. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1825–1836 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Iwata K. et al. Anterior cingulate cortical neuronal activity during perception of noxious thermal stimuli in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1980–1991 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuo C.-C., Chiou R.-J., Liang K.-C. & Yen C.-T. Differential involvement of the anterior cingulate and primary sensorimotor cortices in sensory and affective functions of pain. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 1201–1210 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kröger I. L. & May A. Central effects of acetylsalicylic acid on trigeminal-nociceptive stimuli. J. Headache Pain 15, 59 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Foltz E. L. & White L. E. Pain “relief” by frontal cingulumotomy. J. Neurosurg. 19, 89–100 (1962). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Agarwal N., Choi P. A., Shin S. S., Hansberry D. R. & Mammis A. Anterior cingulotomy for intractable pain. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery 6, 80–83 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Strauss I. et al. Double anterior stereotactic cingulotomy for intractable oncological pain. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 95, 400–408 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Spooner J., Yu H., Kao C., Sillay K. & Konrad P. Neuromodulation of the cingulum for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 107, 169–172 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Farrell S. M., Green A. & Aziz T. The current state of deep brain stimulation for chronic pain and its context in other forms of neuromodulation. Brain Sci. 8, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Johansen J. P., Fields H. L. & Manning B. H. The affective component of pain in rodents: direct evidence for a contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 8077–8082 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Juarez-Salinas D. L. et al. GABAergic cell transplants in the anterior cingulate cortex reduce neuropathic pain aversiveness. Brain 142, 2655–2669 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.LaGraize S. C. & Fuchs P. N. GABAA but not GABAB receptors in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex selectively modulate pain-induced escape/avoidance behavior. Exp. Neurol. 204, 182–194 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Johansen J. P. & Fields H. L. Glutamatergic activation of anterior cingulate cortex produces an aversive teaching signal. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 398–403 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bannister K. et al. Multiple sites and actions of gabapentin-induced relief of ongoing experimental neuropathic pain. Pain 158, 2386–2395 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Donahue R. R., LaGraize S. C. & Fuchs P. N. Electrolytic lesion of the anterior cingulate cortex decreases inflammatory, but not neuropathic nociceptive behavior in rats. Brain Res. 897, 131–138 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.LaGraize S. C., Borzan J., Peng Y. B. & Fuchs P. N. Selective regulation of pain affect following activation of the opioid anterior cingulate cortex system. Exp. Neurol. 197, 22–30 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Qu C. et al. Lesion of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex eliminates the aversiveness of spontaneous neuropathic pain following partial or complete axotomy. Pain 152, 1641–1648 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Navratilova E. et al. Endogenous opioid activity in the anterior cingulate cortex is required for relief of pain. J. Neurosci. 35, 7264–7271 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gomtsian L. et al. Morphine effects within the rodent anterior cingulate cortex and rostral ventromedial medulla reveal separable modulation of affective and sensory qualities of acute or chronic pain. Pain 159, 2512–2521 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barthas F. et al. The anterior cingulate cortex is a critical hub for pain-induced depression. Biol. Psychiatry 77, 236–245 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fuchs P. N., Peng Y. B., Boyette-Davis J. A. & Uhelski M. L. The anterior cingulate cortex and pain processing. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 8, 35 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Terrasa J. L. et al. Anterior cingulate cortex activity during rest is related to alterations in pain perception in aging. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13, 695200 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kasanetz F. & Nevian T. Increased burst coding in deep layers of the ventral anterior cingulate cortex during neuropathic pain. Sci. Rep. 11, 24240 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Devinsky O., Morrell M. J. & Vogt B. A. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 118 (Pt 1), 279–306 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deutsch G. & Samra S. K. Effects of nitrous oxide on global and regional cortical blood flow. Stroke 21, 1293–1298 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gyulai F. E., Firestone L. L., Mintun M. A. & Winter P. M. In vivo imaging of human limbic responses to nitrous oxide inhalation. Anesth. Analg. 83, 291–298 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dashdorj N. et al. Effects of subanesthetic dose of nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow and metabolism: a multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 118, 577–586 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Reinstrup P. et al. Regional cerebral metabolic rate (positron emission tomography) during inhalation of nitrous oxide 50% in humans. Br. J. Anaesth. 100, 66–71 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ghosh K. K. et al. Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat. Methods 8, 871–878 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Corder G. et al. An amygdalar neural ensemble that encodes the unpleasantness of pain. Science 363, 276–281 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen T.-W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zeisel A. et al. Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 347, 1138–1142 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tasic B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335–346 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fuzik J. et al. Integration of electrophysiological recordings with single-cell RNA-seq data identifies neuronal subtypes. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 175–183 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Harris K. D. & Mrsic-Flogel T. D. Cortical connectivity and sensory coding. Nature 503, 51–58 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Niell C. M. & Scanziani M. How cortical circuits implement cortical computations: mouse visual cortex as a model. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 44, 517–546 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Blackwell J. M. & Geffen M. N. Progress and challenges for understanding the function of cortical microcircuits in auditory processing. Nat. Commun. 8, 2165 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wood K. C., Blackwell J. M. & Geffen M. N. Cortical inhibitory interneurons control sensory processing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 46, 200–207 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cichon J., Blanck T. J. J., Gan W.-B. & Yang G. Activation of cortical somatostatin interneurons prevents the development of neuropathic pain. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1122–1132 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dragunow M. & Faull R. The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing. J. Neurosci. Methods 29, 261–265 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mitchell K. et al. Nociception and inflammatory hyperalgesia evaluated in rodents using infrared laser stimulation after Trpv1 gene knockout or resiniferatoxin lesion. Pain 155, 733–745 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Roome R. B. et al. Phox2a defines a developmental origin of the anterolateral system in mice and humans. Cell Rep. 33, 108425 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wheeler-Aceto H. & Cowan A. Standardization of the rat paw formalin test for the evaluation of analgesics. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 104, 35–44 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huang T. et al. Identifying the pathways required for coping behaviours associated with sustained pain. Nature 565, 86–90 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sherrington C. S. The integrative action of the nervous system. (Yale University Press, 1911). doi: 10.1037/13798-000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bradley N. S. & Smith J. L. Neuromuscular patterns of stereotypic hindlimb behaviors in the first two postnatal months. III. Scratching and the paw-shake response in kittens. Brain Res. 466, 69–82 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sanders R. D., Tononi G., Laureys S. & Sleigh J. W. Unresponsiveness ≠ unconsciousness. Anesthesiology 116, 946–959 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sanders R. D. et al. Incidence of Connected Consciousness after Tracheal Intubation: A Prospective, International, Multicenter Cohort Study of the Isolated Forearm Technique. Anesthesiology 126, 214–222 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lennertz R. et al. Connected consciousness after tracheal intubation in young adults: an international multicentre cohort study. Br. J. Anaesth. (2022) doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sebel P. S. et al. The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: a multicenter United States study. Anesth. Analg. 99, 833–839 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Quiquempoix M. et al. Layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons control the gain of cortical output. Cell Rep. 24, 2799–2807.e4 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Vander Weele C. M. et al. Dopamine enhances signal-to-noise ratio in cortical-brainstem encoding of aversive stimuli. Nature 563, 397–401 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fujinaga M. & Maze M. Neurobiology of nitrous oxide-induced antinociceptive effects. Mol. Neurobiol. 25, 167–189 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Homayoun H. & Moghaddam B. NMDA receptor hypofunction produces opposite effects on prefrontal cortex interneurons and pyramidal neurons. J. Neurosci. 27, 11496–11500 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fillinger C., Yalcin I., Barrot M. & Veinante P. Afferents to anterior cingulate areas 24a and 24b and midcingulate areas 24a’ and 24b’ in the mouse. Brain Struct. Funct. 222, 1509–1532 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Meda K. S. et al. Microcircuit Mechanisms through which Mediodorsal Thalamic Input to Anterior Cingulate Cortex Exacerbates Pain-Related Aversion. Neuron 102, 944–959.e3 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tracey I. & Johns E. The pain matrix: reloaded or reborn as we image tonic pain using arterial spin labelling. Pain 148, 359–360 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Peeters L. M. et al. Chemogenetic silencing of neurons in the mouse anterior cingulate area modulates neuronal activity and functional connectivity. Neuroimage 220, 117088 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Basbaum A. I. & Fields H. L. Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 309–338 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fillinger C., Yalcin I., Barrot M. & Veinante P. Efferents of anterior cingulate areas 24a and 24b and midcingulate areas 24a’ and 24b’ in the mouse. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 1747–1778 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Linassi F., Zanatta P., Tellaroli P., Ori C. & Carron M. Isolated forearm technique: a meta-analysis of connected consciousness during different general anaesthesia regimens. Br. J. Anaesth. 121, 198–209 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gaskell A. L. et al. Frontal alpha-delta EEG does not preclude volitional response during anaesthesia: prospective cohort study of the isolated forearm technique. Br. J. Anaesth. 119, 664–673 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ní Mhuircheartaigh R., Warnaby C., Rogers R., Jbabdi S. & Tracey I. Slow-wave activity saturation and thalamocortical isolation during propofol anesthesia in humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 208ra148 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pawar N. & Barreto Chang O. L. Burst suppression during general anesthesia and postoperative outcomes: mini review. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 15, 767489 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.García P. S., Kreuzer M., Hight D. & Sleigh J. W. Effects of noxious stimulation on the electroencephalogram during general anaesthesia: a narrative review and approach to analgesic titration. Br. J. Anaesth. 126, 445–457 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vong L. et al. Leptin action on GABAergic neurons prevents obesity and reduces inhibitory tone to POMC neurons. Neuron 71, 142–154 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hippenmeyer S. et al. A developmental switch in the response of DRG neurons to ETS transcription factor signaling. PLoS Biol. 3, e159 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Taniguchi H. et al. A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in cerebral cortex. Neuron 71, 995–1013 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tamamaki N. et al. Green fluorescent protein expression and colocalization with calretinin, parvalbumin, and somatostatin in the GAD67-GFP knock-in mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 467, 60–79 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jackson J., Karnani M. M., Zemelman B. V., Burdakov D. & Lee A. K. Inhibitory control of prefrontal cortex by the claustrum. Neuron 99, 1029–1039.e4 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Alkire M. T. & Gorski L. A. Relative amnesic potency of five inhalational anesthetics follows the Meyer-Overton rule. Anesthesiology 101, 417–429 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dwyer R., Bennett H. L., Eger E. I. & Heilbron D. Effects of isoflurane and nitrous oxide in subanesthetic concentrations on memory and responsiveness in volunteers. Anesthesiology 77, 888–898 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Eger E. I. Age, minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration-awake. Anesth. Analg. 93, 947–953 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Karippacheril J. G. & Ho T. Y. Data acquisition from S/5 GE Datex anesthesia monitor using VSCapture: An open source.NET/Mono tool. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 29, 423–424 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhang J., Cavanaugh D. J., Nemenov M. I. & Basbaum A. I. The modality-specific contribution of peptidergic and non-peptidergic nociceptors is manifest at the level of dorsal horn nociresponsive neurons. J Physiol (Lond) 591, 1097–1110 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wasilczuk A. Z., Meng Q. C. & McKinstry-Wu A. R. Electroencephalographic evidence for individual neural inertia in mice that decreases with time. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 15, 787612 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Jarvie B. C., Chen J. Y., King H. O. & Palmiter R. D. Satb2 neurons in the parabrachial nucleus mediate taste perception. Nat. Commun. 12, 224 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mukamel E. A., Nimmerjahn A. & Schnitzer M. J. Automated analysis of cellular signals from large-scale calcium imaging data. Neuron 63, 747–760 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.