Abstract
Living systems contain various functional membraneless organelles that can segregate selective proteins and RNAs via liquid–liquid phase separation. Inspired by nature, many synthetic compartments have been engineered in vitro and in living cells, mostly focused on protein-scaffolded systems. Herein, we introduce a nature-inspired genetically encoded RNA tag to program cellular condensate formations and recruit non-phase-transition target RNAs to achieve functional modulation. In our system, different lengths of CAG-repeat tags were tested as the self-assembled scaffold to drive multivalent condensate formation. Various selective target messenger RNAs and noncoding RNAs can be compartmentalized into these condensates. With the help of fluorogenic RNA aptamers, we have systematically studied the formation dynamics, spatial distributions, sizes, and densities of these cellular RNA condensates. The regulation functions of these CAG-repeat tags on the cellular RNA localization, lifetime, RNA–protein interactions, and gene expression have also been investigated. Considering the importance of RNA condensation in both health and disease conditions, these genetically encodable modular and self-assembled tags can be potentially widely used for chemical biology and synthetic biology studies.
Introduction
The functions of cellular RNAs are highly related with their subcellular localizations and local environment. One ubiquitous approach to control RNA localization is via macromolecular condensation, i.e., the formation of membraneless subcellular compartments. RNA compartmentalization is prevalent and plays critical roles in process such as transcription, splicing, RNA degradation, heterochromatin formation, and stress response.1–4 The precise modulation of subcellular compartmentalization of specific RNA sequences is thus important for controlling gene expression and cellular functions.
Cellular RNA localization, compartmentalization, and trafficking have been largely regulated by the formation of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes via RNA–protein interactions.5,6 Recent studies demonstrated that specific RNA self-assemblies, particularly among repeat expansions, can also be used to mediate RNA phase separation inside living cells.7–10 Compared to protein-based RNA compartmentalization, RNA–RNA interaction-mediated condensate formation can be highly sequence-specific, modular, and programmable.11,12 As a result, powerful RNA devices may be engineered to control cellular compartmentalization of specific cellular RNAs and modulate their local concentrations and functions.
In this study, short CAG trinucleotide repeats are engineered into genetically encodable self-regulated tags to recruit and condense different cellular target RNAs. CAG repeats are used here because these trinucleotides can readily form condensation, without the involvement of proteins.9,10,13,14 We want to test here if these naturally occurring CAG repeats can be used as functional RNA nanodevices, either being a cis-acting RNA element within target RNA transcript or as a trans-acting effector functioning through specific hybridization with target RNAs. Both cis- and trans-mechanisms can be potentially applied to develop general platforms to induce the phase separation of various target RNAs, in vitro and in living systems.
To image these RNA condensates, especially inside living cells, we fuse the CAG-repeat-tagged RNA strands with a fluorogenic RNA aptamer, named Broccoli. Broccoli is an RNA strand that can selectively bind and activate the fluorescence signal of small-molecule dyes, such as DFHBI-1T.15 The dynamics, sizes, and densities of RNA condensates can thus be visualized and quantified based on fluorescence images. Our results show that target RNAs of different lengths and sequences can be efficiently recruited into condensates by these CAG-repeat tags. CAG repeats can also be genetically encoded to regulate the subcellular localization, compartmentalization, and function of various messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and noncoding RNAs inside living bacterial cells.
Results and Discussion
We first asked if Broccoli can be used to visualize CAG-repeat-induced RNA condensation. To test this, we synthesized F30-2d×Broccoli-tagged RNA strands containing 0×, 4×, 20×, 31×, or 47×CAG repeats, which were named as 0R, 4R, 20R, 31R, and 47R, respectively. The F30 scaffold was used to ensure the proper folding of two incorporated dimeric Broccoli RNA (Table S1).16 Compared to untagged F30-2d×Broccoli (i.e., 0R), after attaching these RNA repeats, F30-2d×Broccoli still exhibits strong, even slightly higher, fluorescence signals (Figure S1a). By annealing a solution containing 4 μM RNA, 20 mM MgCl2, and 80 μM DFHBI-1T, 20R, 31R, and 47R samples exhibited obvious RNA condensation (Figure 1a), with a large number of spherical-shaped fluorescent condensates at ~1.4–1.8 μm in diameter (Figure 1c). In contrast, almost no phase separation was observed with the 0R and 70AC control. Here, 70AC is an F30-2d×Broccoli-tagged RNA of equivalent length as 47R but contains only repeated AC dinucleotides. Interestingly under our experimental condition, with only 4×CAG repeats, 4R can also generate large-sized RNA condensates (diameter, ~1.8 μm), while at a lower density than longer CAG repeats.
To further compare the RNA densities within these different CAG-repeat aggregates, we characterized the partition ratio of each single condensate, which is defined as the ratio of average fluorescence intensity inside individual condensate versus background solution fluorescence signals. A partition ratio of ~2.2, 8.9, 7.4, 7.3 and 7.7 was exhibited for the 70AC, 4R, 20R, 31R, and 47R condensates, respectively (Figure 1d). 4R exhibited a slightly higher partition ratio and larger aggregation size as compared to other expanded CAG repeats. On the other hand, 4R solution contained less condensates (~5 per 400 μm2 imaging area) than that of 20R, 31R, and 47R (>15 counts per same area) (Figure 1). These results indicated that the CAG repeats can indeed induce in vitro RNA phase separation. Meanwhile, Broccoli can be used as a fluorescence imaging reporter for RNA condensates, and these fluorescence signals may also be used to estimate RNA concentrations within each condensate (Figure S1b, c).
We noticed that these CAG-repeat condensates tend to exhibit gel-like behaviors, such as stacking and slow fusion (Figure 1a). These gel-like properties can be resulted from strong multivalence interactions among these trinucleotide repeats.8,17 A fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) approach was also applied to measure RNA mobilities in condensates. Minimal fluorescence recovery was observed (over a total of ~5 min, Figure S2), indicating that in vitro formed CAG condensates indeed display a highly static structure. The kinetics of RNA condensation was also monitored right after the snap cooling of a solution containing 4 μM 47R and 20 mM MgCl2. Our results showed that the number of RNA condensates kept increasing during the first 15 min of incubation, while the diameter and partition ratio of each condensate already reached ~90% of the maximum level in ~5 min (Figure S3). These data indicated the fast assembly kinetics of these RNA condensates.
We also studied the effect of RNA and Mg2+ concentrations on the CAG-repeat-induced phase separation. In our test, 0.02–10 μM of 0R, 20R, 31R, or 47R strand was separately mixed with 5–40 mM of MgCl2. As expected, the formation of RNA condensates can be facilitated with increasing concentrations of RNA and MgCl2 (Figure S4). RNAs with longer CAG repeats, e.g., 31R and 47R, can more readily form condensates, even at reduced RNA and MgCl2 levels. It is worth mentioning that in these tests, almost no RNA condensation was observed under physiologically relevant ≤5 mM Mg2+ ion conditions.18,19 Meanwhile, minimal RNA condensation was shown without annealing. However, intracellular RNA compartmentalization can still be quite different from these in vitro tests, as RNA condensation can be potentially facilitated by the crowded and protein-rich cellular environment.7,20,21
Before testing RNA condensation in living cells, we also wondered if these CAG repeats can function as general molecular tags to induce the phase transition of attached RNA sequences. For this purpose, we synthesized 20 different RNA strands that contain 5’-F30-2d×Broccoli-tagged 100-, 200-, 500-, 1,000-, or 2,000-nucleotide (nt)-long scrambled sequences. 0×, 20×, 31×, or 47×CAG repeats were conjugated at the 3’-end of these strands, respectively. 4×CAG repeats were not chosen because their condensation occurs at low efficiency. Without attaching CAG repeats, scrambled RNAs (named as 0.1k, 0.2k, 0.5k, 1.0k, and 2.0k) could not form condensates in a solution containing 4 μM RNA, 20 mM MgCl2, and 80 μM DFHBI-1T (Figure 2). In contrast, the 20×CAG tag can induce compartmentalization when short RNA sequences (i.e., 100 and 200 nt) were attached, while obvious condensates were shown in all the solutions containing 31×CAG- or 47×CAG-tagged RNA strands. These results indicated that CAG repeats can still induce phase separation even after tagging with long non-condensation RNA strands.
We further quantified the correlations between the length of CAG repeats and the partition ratio and size of condensates. As shown in Figure S5, a longer CAG-repeat tag can generally increase both the diameter and partition ratio of RNA condensates. While interestingly, after attaching longer scrambled RNAs to the same CAG-repeat tag, the partition ratio and size of condensates tended to first increase and then decrease (Figure 2b, c). This result is consistent with those observed in synthetic multivalent polymers with changing valency of interactions,22 suggesting that the efficiency of condensate formation is influenced by the sequence length of both CAG repeats and target RNAs. A longer CAG repeat tag is normally needed to recruit larger RNA targets into condensates.
To next study if CAG repeats can also mediate condensation of endogenous RNA sequences, three bacterial RNAs were tested, including a 109-nt-long OxyS small noncoding RNA (sRNA) and two lac operon mRNA, lacY (1,254 nt) and lacZ (3,044 nt). After tagging with F30-2d×Broccoli and 20×, 31×, or 47×CAG repeats, OxyS can easily form obvious condensates, with size and partition ratio comparable to those of 0.1k scrambled RNAs (Figure 2 and S6). Similarly, 31× and 47×CAG-tagged lacY mRNA can also generate condensates close to those of 1.0k scrambled RNAs. Even in the case of the 3,044-nt-long lacZ mRNA, after conjugating with 31×CAG and 47×CAG, micrometer-sized condensates can be clearly observed (Figure 2a). These data demonstrated that the CAG repeat tags can facilitate both scrambled and functional RNA species to partition into condensates.
By combining all these results from different RNA targets, our data showed that the size of condensates tended to be first enlarged and then reduced with an increasing ratio between the CAG repeat number and total RNA length, NCAG/Ntotal (Figure 2d). Meanwhile, the partition ratio is also generally increased at low NCAG/Ntotal ratio and then slightly decreased at NCAG/Ntotal >5% for 31× and 47×CAG repeat samples (Figure 2e). These results suggested that NCAG/Ntotal ratio can be potentially an important factor for regulating the aggregation status of RNA-repeat condensates.
After all these in vitro characterizations, we next asked if CAG repeats could also be used as genetically encoded tags to regulate the condensation of target RNAs inside living cells. In our test, we first transformed BL21 Star™ (DE3) E. coli cells with pET-28c vectors that express 4R, 20R, 31R, or 47R sequences. Compared to the control cells encoding only F30-2d×Broccoli (0R) or 70AC, the formation of cellular condensates can be clearly visualized in CAG-repeat-containing strains (Figure 3a). Similar to the in vitro results, the number and partition ratio of cellular condensates highly depend on the length of CAG repeats. Most abundant and RNA-concentrated condensates were shown in 47R-expressing cells (Figure 3b, c). Vast majority of CAG-repeat-expressing cells (4R–47R) contain one or two condensates (76%–85%), mainly localized at the cell poles. Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning that minimal cytotoxicity was observed in these CAG repeats-expressing E. coli cells (Figure S7). Indeed, CAG repeat-regulated formation of RNA condensates can occur in living bacterial cells.
We also applied FRAP to study the mobility of RNAs within these cellular condensates. In contrast to our in vitro data (Figure S2), these intracellular RNA condensates exhibit more liquid-like properties as fast fluorescence recovery was observed: ~90% of original fluorescence signals being reached in ~30 s (Figure S8). Interestingly, for cells possessing two major condensates at opposite poles, after photobleaching the condensate at one pole, a clear transfer of fluorescence signal from the other unbleached pole was observed in 5 out of 9 tested cells (Figure S8).
To further study if the formation of these cellular condensates can be simply regulated by adding magnesium ions to increase the binding affinities among CAG-repeat strands, we incubated 0R- and 47R-expressing cells with 0, 1, or 5 mM MgCl2. Indeed, both the number and partition ratio of RNA condensates were upregulated in 47R cells after adding 5 mM MgCl2 (Figure 3d and S9). In contrast, no changes were observed in 0R cells, meanwhile, the average cellular Broccoli fluorescence in both groups of cells was not altered. Mg2+ can thus be used as a convenient regulator of these cellular CAG-repeat condensates.
In addition, our data showed that the formation of CAG condensates may reduce the cellular RNA degradation in these bacterial cells. In our test, after incubation for 24 hours, ~45% of 47R cellular fluorescence could still be observed, with most signals coming from condensates. While in 0R-expressing E. coli cells, the cellular fluorescence was decreased by >75% under this same experimental condition (Figure S10).
We next tested if CAG repeats can also recruit other cellular RNA targets into condensates. For this purpose, we prepared pET-28c vectors that respectively express 0R, 20R, 31R, or 47R-tagged OxyS, lacY, and lacZ RNAs. After transforming into BL21 Star™ (DE3) cells, bright fluorescent foci can be observed only in CAG-repeat-expressing cells (Figure S11). Both the number and partition ratio of RNA condensates tend to be increased after attaching elongated CAG repeats (Figure S11). On average, ~1.5–2.4 condensates were shown in each individual cell, mostly at the poles. All these data supported that the CAG repeats can be used as genetically encoded tags to drive the phase transition of target RNAs inside living cells.
To further assess if the formation of CAG condensates will change the cellular localization of target RNAs, we applied super-resolution structured illumination microscopy to image 0R- and 47R-tagged lacY mRNA. It is known that lacY prefers to localize near bacterial membranes, i.e., the functioning site of its protein product, lactose permease LacY.23–25 Indeed, without the CAG-repeat modification, lacY-0R was exclusively located at the E. coli membranes, exhibiting a hollow fluorescent pattern around the cells (Figure 4a). In contrast, after tagging with 47R, the hollow membrane fluorescent pattern was disrupted and replaced by condensation across the cytoplasm in most majority of cells. These results further validated that the CAG-repeat tags can alter the cellular locations of the attached RNAs.
We also studied if the phase transition of target RNAs can be used to control their cellular functions. OxyS sRNA is known to repress the expression of transcription termination factor NusG and impair cell division, and as a result, generate long bacterial cells.26,27 By comparing the length of individual E. coli cells expressing either 0×CAG- or 47×CAG-tagged OxyS, our results showed that the average length of OxyS-47R cells is ~46% shorter than OxyS-0R cells (Figure 4b). As a control, without attaching OxyS, 0R- and 47R-expressing E. coli cells exhibited almost identical lengths as those of OxyS-47R cells. These data indicated that after condensation, the regulation function of OxyS on cell division is impaired, likely due to a reduced chance of OxyS to interact with nusG mRNA, which resumed the NusG expression.26
To further test if protein synthesis can indeed be regulated via the condensation of specific mRNAs, we transformed BL21 Star™ (DE3) cells with vectors expressing 0×CAG- or 47×CAG-tagged 705-nt-long mRNA (named as Nir-0R and Nir-47R) that encodes a near-infrared fluorescent protein (NirFP). Compared to Nir-0R cells, ~20% lower NirFP signals were observed in Nir-47R cells (Figure 4c). Most Nir-47R RNA was located within condensates at the poles (as shown in the Broccoli channel), while the majority of translated NirFP proteins were observed throughout the cells, except the poles. We further plotted the cellular NirFP signals as a function of the number of condensates in each Nir-47R cell. A reduced NirFP signal was shown in cells that contain more condensates (Figure 4c). These data suggested that gene expression can be possibly regulated by the CAG-repeat-mediated condensation of cellular mRNAs.
We next wanted to study if these CAG repeats can be used as trans-acting effectors to potentially control the cellular condensation of endogenous target RNAs. To test this, we first in vitro synthesized F30-2d×Broccoli-containing 47R strands (named as 47R-cO and 47R-cY) that were tagged with a complementary sequence that hybridize with either an OxyS or lacY target RNA. A 23-nt- and 26-nt-long non-structural region in OxyS and lacY was respectively designed as the targeting domain, which secondary structures were pre-evaluated via Mfold and NUPACK software.28,29 To image the proposed RNA–RNA interactions, a secondary fluorogenic RNA aptamer (Pepper)30 was tagged to the target OxyS and lacY RNAs, i.e., OxyS-Pep and lacY-Pep. After mixing OxyS-Pep with 47R-cO (Figure 5a) or lacY-Pep with 47R-cY (Figure 5b), the fluorescence signals from target RNAs (Pepper channel) were clearly accumulated and colocalized with the 47R condensates (Broccoli channel). As a negative control, without attaching the complementary sequence, 47R strands can still form obvious condensates but without recruiting OxyS-Pep or lacY-Pep (Figure 5a, b).
Interestingly, a ring-shaped Pepper fluorescence pattern was observed in both OxyS-Pep/47R-cO and lacY-Pep/47R-cY condensate samples (Figure 5a, b). Meanwhile, the recruitment of target RNAs led to an increase in the condensate size (Figure 5c). These results suggested that the target RNAs were mainly hybridized to the surface areas of condensates, likely after the initial formation of the condensate core regions. To further assess if this ring-shaped fluorescence distribution could be resulted from the misfolding of Pepper RNAs inside the center of condensates, we synthesized a control strand with Pepper directly tagged with a 47–CAG-repeat (47R-Pep). 47R-Pep exhibited minimal ring-shaped condensates (Figure 5d), indicated that the ring-shaped Pepper fluorescence in OxyS-Pep/47R-cO and lacY-Pep/47R-cY samples were indeed likely due to the surface attachment of these target RNAs onto the CAG-repeat condensates.
We lastly tested if these trans-acting CAG-repeat tags can also function inside living cells. For this purpose, we transformed BL21 Star™ (DE3) cells with vectors expressing Pepper-tagged NirFP mRNA (Nir-Pep) together with an F30-2d×Broccoli-conjugated 47×CAG-repeat strand (47R) or that contains a 25-nt-long complementary sequence 47R-cN. In the presence of 5 mM MgCl2, based on the Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the two fluorescent channels, ~80% of Pepper signals in Nir-Pep- and 47R-cN-expressing cells were colocalized with CAG-repeat condensates (Figure 6a, b). While in contrast, only 55% of Nir-Pep RNAs were found inside 47R condensates, indicating the roles of complementary sequence in recruiting target RNAs into CAG-repeat condensates. Consistent with the results from cis-acting CAG-repeat tags (Figure 4c), after forming condensates, ~30% lower NirFP signals were observed in 47R-cN/Nir-Pep cells as compared to that of 47R/Nir-Pep control (Figure 6c). All these data suggested that trans-acting CAG-repeat tags can be used to recruit cellular mRNAs into condensates, which may be potentially engineered into a functional gene regulation platform.
Conclusions
The importance of RNA condensation in studying cellular functions as well as disease diagnosis and treatment has been increasingly recognized.11,31 Programmable and self-functional probes that enable precise cellular RNA condensate regulation are thus useful tools in the field of chemical biology and synthetic biology. In this study, we demonstrated that naturally existing CAG repeats can be used as genetically encoded tags to induce cellular condensation of different RNAs of interest, including small noncoding RNAs and long mRNAs (>3,000 nt). The formation of these self-assembled RNA condensates can be tracked in vitro and in living cells by fluorogenic RNA aptamers. The number, size, and density of RNA condensates can be facilely regulated by the length of CAG-repeat tags and Mg2+ concentration. The cellular RNA localization and compartmentalization can be rationally tuned by these CAG repeats tags, via either cis- or trans-acting mechanism. Critically, the cellular functions of these target RNAs such as in RNA-protein interactions (in the case of lacY) and gene expression patterns (in the case of NirFP and OxyS), can also be regulated by these CAG-repeat tags.
We expect that these functional CAG-repeat tags can be broadly applied to reprogram living cells with defined compartmentalizations and structures. This work can also inspire the potential engineering of various types of genetically encodable RNA nanodevices, which can be based on similar nature-inspired RNA repeat tags. These tags will be used to regulate different endogenous RNA targets and may also be applied to orthogonally recruit different RNA and protein molecules into specific RNA condensates. Powerful nanodevices may also be possibly designed to be controllable by different small-molecule or light triggers.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from a UMass Amherst start-up grant, NSF CAREER award #1846152, Sloan Research Fellowship, and Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award to M. You. R. Zheng was also supported by NIH T32GM008515. We are grateful to Dr. James Chambers for the assistance in fluorescence imaging. The authors also thank other members in the You Lab for useful discussion and valuable comments.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability
The data found in this study are available within the main text and in the ESI online.
Notes and References
- (1).Martin K. C.; Ephrussi A. mRNA Localization: Gene expression in the spatial dimension. Cell 2009, 136 (4), 719–730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Rhine K.; Vidaurre V.; Myong S. RNA droplets. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2020, 49 (1), 247–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Sabari B. R.; Dall’Agnese A.; Young R. A. Biomolecular condensates in the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2020, 45 (11), 961–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Protter D. S. W.; Parker R. Principles and properties of stress granules. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26 (9), 668–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Bracha D.; Walls M. T.; Brangwynne C. P. Probing and engineering liquid-phase organelles. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37 (12), 1435–1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Buchan J. R. mRNP granules. RNA Biol. 2014, 11 (8), 1019–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Van Treeck B.; Protter D. S. W.; Matheny T.; Khong A.; Link C. D.; Parker R. RNA self-assembly contributes to stress granule formation and defining the stress granule transcriptome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018, 115 (11), 2734–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Krzyzosiak W. J.; Sobczak K.; Wojciechowska M.; Fiszer A.; Mykowska A.; Kozlowski P. Triplet repeat RNA structure and its role as pathogenic agent and therapeutic target. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (1), 11–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Jain A.; Vale R. D. RNA phase transitions in repeat expansion disorders. Nature 2017, 546 (7657), 243–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Guo H.; Ryan J. C.; Song X.; Mallet A.; Zhang M.; Pabst V.; Decrulle A. L.; Ejsmont P.; Wintermute E. H.; Lindner A. B. Spatial engineering of E. coli with addressable phase-separated RNAs. Cell 2022, 185 (20), 3823–3837.e23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Roden C.; Gladfelter A. S. RNA contributions to the form and function of biomolecular condensates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22 (3) 183–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Van Treeck B.; Parker R. Emerging roles for intermolecular RNA-RNA interactions in RNP assemblies. Cell 2018, 174 (4), 791–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Nguyen H. T.; Hori N.; Thirumalai D. Condensates in RNA repeat sequences are heterogeneously organized and exhibit reptation dynamics. Nat. Chem. 2022, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Ma Y.; Li H.; Gong Z.; Yang S.; Wang P.; Tang C. Nucleobase clustering contributes to the formation and hollowing of repeat-expansion RNA condensate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (11), 4716–4720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Filonov G. S.; Moon J. D.; Svensen N.; Jaffrey S. R. Broccoli: Rapid selection of an RNA mimic of green fluorescent protein by fluorescence-based selection and directed evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (46), 16299–16308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Filonov G. S.; Jaffrey S. R. RNA imaging with dimeric Broccoli in live bacterial and mammalian cells. Curr. Protoc. Chem. Biol. 2016, 8 (1), 1–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Li P.; Banjade S.; Cheng H. C.; Kim S.; Chen B.; Guo L.; Llaguno M.; Hollingsworth J. V.; King D. S.; Banani S. F.; Russo P. S.; Jiang Q. X.; Nixon B. T.; Rosen M. K. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins. Nature 2012, 483 (7389), 336–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Groisman E. A.; Hollands K.; Kriner M. A.; Lee E. J.; Park S. Y.; Pontes M. H. Bacterial Mg2+ homeostasis, transport, and virulence. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2013, 47, 625–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Romani A. M. Cellular magnesium homeostasis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2011, 512 (1), 1–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Boeynaems S.; Holehouse A. S.; Weinhardt V.; Kovacs D.; Van Lindt J.; Larabell C.; Van Den Bosch L.; Das R.; Tompa P. S.; Pappu R. V.; Gitler A. D. Spontaneous driving forces give rise to protein– RNA condensates with coexisting phases and complex material properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2019, 116 (16), 7889–7898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Ellis R. J. Macromolecular crowding: an important but neglected aspect of the intracellular environment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001, 11(1), 114–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Sing C. E.; Perry S. L. Recent progress in the science of complex coacervation. Soft Matter 2020, 16 (12), 2885–2914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Nevo-Dinur K.; Nussbaum-Shochat A.; Ben-Yehuda S.; Amster-Choder O. Translation-independent localization of mRNA in E. coli. Science 2011, 331 (6020), 1081–1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Kannaiah S.; Livny J.; Amster-Choder O. Spatiotemporal organization of the E. coli transcriptome: translation independence and engagement in regulation. Mol. Cell 2019, 76 (4), 574–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Guan L.; Kaback H. R. Lessons from lactose permease. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2006, 35, 67–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Barshishat S.; Elgrably-Weiss M.; Edelstein J.; Georg J.; Govindarajan S.; Haviv M.; Wright P. R.; Hess W. R.; Altuvia S. OxyS small RNA induces cell cycle arrest to allow DNA damage repair. EMBO J. 2018, 37 (3), 413–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Fröhlich K. S.; Gottesman S. Small regulatory RNAs in the enterobacterial response to envelope damage and oxidative stress. Regulating with RNA in Bacteria and Archaea 2018: 211–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (13), 3406–3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Zadeh J. N.; Steenberg C. D.; Bois J. S.; Wolfe B. R.; Pierce M. B.; Khan A. R.; Dirks R. M.; Pierce N. A. NUPACK: Analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32 (1), 170–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Chen X.; Zhang D.; Su N.; Bao B.; Xie X.; Zuo F.; Yang L.; Wang H.; Jiang L.; Lin Q.; Fang M. Visualizing RNA dynamics in live cells with bright and stable fluorescent RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37(11), 1287–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Conti B. A.; Oppikofer M. Biomolecular condensates: new opportunities for drug discovery and RNA therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 43(10), 820–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data found in this study are available within the main text and in the ESI online.