Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0283825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283825

Swine intestinal segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrients bioaccessibility

Matteo Dell’Anno 1, Fabio Acocella 1, Pietro Riccaboni 1, Camilla Recordati 1, Elisabetta Bongiorno 1, Luciana Rossi 1,*
Editor: Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer2
PMCID: PMC10104296  PMID: 37058494

Abstract

Nutrition science requires more science-based evidences for the development of effective functional diets. To reduce animals for experimental purposes innovative reliable and informative models, simulating the complex intestinal physiology, are needed. The aim of this study was to develop a swine duodenum segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrient bioaccessibility and functionality across time. At the slaughterhouse, one sow intestine was harvested following Maastricht criteria for organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) for transplantation purposes. Duodenum tract was isolated and perfused in sub-normothermic conditions with heterologous blood after cold ischemia induction. Duodenum segment perfusion model was maintained under controlled pressure conditions through extracorporeal circulation for 3 hours. Blood samples from extracorporeal circulation and luminal content samples were collected at regular intervals for the evaluation of glucose concentration by glucometer, minerals (Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+) by ICP-OES, lactate-dehydrogenase and nitrite oxide by spectrophotometric methods. Dacroscopic observation showed peristaltic activity caused by intrinsic nerves. Glycemia decreased over time (from 44.00±1.20 mg/dL to 27.50±0.41; p < 0.01), suggesting glucose utilization by the tissue confirming the organ viability in line with histological examinations. At the end of the experimental period, intestinal mineral concentrations were lower than their level in blood plasma suggesting their bioaccessibility (p < 0.001). A progressive increase of LDH concentration over time was observed in the luminal content probably related to a loss of viability (from 0.32±0.02 to 1.36±0.02 OD; p < 0.05) confirmed by histological findings that revealed a de-epithelization of the distal portion of duodenum. Isolated swine duodenum perfusion model satisfied the criteria for studying bioaccessibility of nutrients, offering a variety of experimental possibilities in line with 3Rs principle.

1 Introduction

Nowadays, nutrition plays a pivotal role for both human and animal health, related not only to simply to satisfy nutritional requirements, it also plays a key role in the health and welfare also through its functionality [14]. The literature offers an heterogenous panorama of nutritional studies, and several studies are contradictory on the argument. The prediction of the nutritional quality of food and feed products requires more knowledge related to the individual digestibility of dietary compounds [5].

Currently, the request to reduce animals for experimental purposes is continuously growing. European policies on animal experimentation are intensely aiming to increase the protection of experimental animals, thus various alternative methods have being developed to achieve this purpose [6]. Even the most advanced in vitro and in silico systems cannot fully simulate complex phenomena such as inflammation, digestion, pathologies, and metabolism. However, the introduction of innovative non-animal models is fundamental as complementary to animal experimentation [7]. Thus, reliable science-based models are required in order to reduce and replace animals for experimental purposes. The gastrointestinal physiology is a complex field that involves different tissues and systems (epithelium, muscles, nerves, connective, hormones and glandule), and the use of animals for studying nutrient digestion is still considered essential.

Though remarkable results achieved with in vitro models, organ architecture, epithelium integrity and nutrient absorption are not, at present, efficiently simulated. In vitro studies range in their level of complexity from simple monocultures to complex 3-D structures containing several cell types that are organized into a structure that retains (ex vivo tissue explants) or mimics (tissue engineered in vitro models) different in vivo elements [8]. The ex vivo digestion models are supposed to mimic the in vivo processes better than the in vitro technology, thanks to a manufacturing process of digestive fluids, and the presence of the complete array of proteases and substances that in vivo concur to the digestive process [9]. Several ex vivo studies have been conducted on pigs due to the similar characteristics of swine species in terms of similar morphology, structure, composition and enzymatic activity to humans and the low cost of this technology.

Organ explants efficiently simulate the entire animal complexity, offering the possibility to perform ex vivo experiments under standardized conditions and harvest several tissues from a single animal in line with the 3R principle (replace, reduce, refine). In addition, the possibility to perform more tests involving the same donor, improves the robustness of the ex vivo models [10]. It has been demonstrated that the mucosal epithelium is extremely susceptible to ischemia [11] and although ex vivo models can better reproduce the complexity of the in vivo situation when compared to in vitro models, deterioration of the explanted tissue and lack of hemodynamics can cause differences between ex vivo and in vivo data [12]. The perfusion of ex vivo tissue allow to the conservation of organ viability and structure for a longer period compared to classic ex vivo models [13]. Recent studies, showed encouraging results of swine intestinal perfused model suggesting it as a cost-effective, practical and reliable strategy for the study of intestinal physiology, pharmacology and transplantation [14]. In this scenario, the aim of this study was to develop and assess an innovative swine intestinal segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrient bioaccessibility and organ functionality across time for further applications to study the effect of feed ingredients and additives on nutrients bioavailability.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Organ harvesting and extracorporeal circulation

One gastrointestinal tract was harvested at the slaughterhouse from a 100kg Large White sow, following the Maastricht criteria for organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) for transplantation purposes [15]. Heterologous blood was collected at the slaughterhouse and 25 IU of heparin and 1 g of Cefazolin were added to avoid coagulation and bacterial contaminations. The blood was stored at 4 °C until organ perfusion. During the period of the “warm ischemia”, that lasted from the animal exsanguination until the duodenum isolation, the mesenteric artery was cannulated [16]. The “cold ischemia” started with arterial infusion of 2 L of Belzer UW Cold Storage solution (S.A.L.F. Spa, Bergamo, Italy) [17] within 9 minutes for organ structure preservation. The descendant part of duodenum was isolated, and an intraluminal access was set-up by fixing a luer-lock connector on the pylorus side. The intestinal segment was intraluminal perfused with 360 mL of sterile Krebs-Ringer buffer (NaCl 115 mmol/L, K2HPO4 2.4 mmol/L, KH2PO4 0.4 mmol/L, CaCl2 1.2 mmol/L, MgCl2 1.2 mmol/L, NaHCO3- 25 mmol/L, glucose 10 mmol/L) according to Biolley et al. [18] for favoring the epithelial structure conservation. The organ was transported to the laboratory submerged in a Ringer’s lactate solution at 4°C. Duodenum tract was maintained in controlled pressure conditions (flux pump 1.48 L/min, O2 2 L/min, artery pressure 76/55 mmHg) through extracorporeal circulation with heterologous blood at sub-normothermic perfusion condition for 3 hours starting by the addition of warm blood at 37 °C. The circuit was composed by a peristaltic pump (as a beating heart), venous reservoir and blood oxygenator (as lungs) [19]. Organ temperature was monitored using a thermometer for the entire experimental period.

2.2 Sample collection and analyses

During the first hour of extracorporeal circulation blood samples were collected from the line at 7 minutes interval (T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8). Throughout the second hour, hematic samples were collected each 15 minutes (T9, T10, T11, T12) and at the third hour the collection was performed at 30 minutes intervals (T13, T14). Plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. In addition, the intestinal content was collected from T0 to T14 every 30 minutes from the luer-lock connector. All biological samples were evaluated for mineral and metabolites concentrations.

Glucose concentration was evaluated immediately after blood and intestinal lumen solution sampling from extracorporeal circulation line and the luer-lock connector using a glucometer (U-Right 4278, Biochemical Systems International S.p.A, Arezzo, Italy). The content of main macro-elements (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+) was assessed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Optima 3300 XL, Perkin Elmer Inc., USA). First, calibration curves for each element considered were obtained using certified reference materials. Blood and intestinal content samples were then diluted 1:100 (v/v) with sterile MilliQ water, filtered with 0.45 um syringe filters and injected. The pH of intestinal lumen content was evaluated with pHmeter. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and nitrite ion (NO2-) concentrations were evaluated through colorimetric kits (CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay and Griess Reagent System, Promega Italia S.r.l, Milan, Italy) following the manufacturer instructions. In particular, absorbances were read at 490 nm for LDH and 540 nm for NO2- using a spectrophotometer (Model 680 Microplate Reader; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).

2.3 Histology, immunohistochemistry, and digital image analysis

After 3 hours of continuous perfusion, the intestinal segment was subdivided in three portions (proximal A, medial B, and distal C; Fig 1) and tissue samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 4 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).

Fig 1. Representative image of the intestinal segment perfusion model, ideally subdivided in proximal (A), medial (B) and distal (C) portions for tissue sampling.

Fig 1

The outlined lines indicate the incision points.

To assess the extent of epithelial cells proliferation in the intestinal mucosa, immunohistochemistry with anti-ki67 (SP6, RM-9106-S, Labvision) primary antibody was performed. Four μm sections were deparaffinized and underwent heat-induced epitope retrieval at pH 9, for 40 min at 95°C (Dewax and HIER Buffer H, TA-999-DHBH, Thermo Scientific, UK). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating sections in 3% H2O2 for 10 min. Slides were rinsed and treated with PBS containing 10% normal serum for 30 min to reduce nonspecific background staining and then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with the primary antibodies. Sections were incubated for 30 min with appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and then labelled by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase (ABC) procedure with a commercial immunoperoxidase kit (VECTASTAIN Elite ABC HRP Kit Standard, PK-6100, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The immunoreaction was visualized with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine substrates (Peroxidase DAB Substrate Kit, VC-SK-4100-KI01, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 5 min and sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Digital slides were obtained from H&E, and immunostained sections by using the NanoZoomer-S60 Digital slide scanner (Hamamatsu, C13210-01), and images were captured by using theNDP.view2 Viewing software (Hamamatsu, U12388-01).

To assess the proliferation of the intestinal mucosa, the % of ki67-positive epithelial cells (number of ki67 positive nuclei/number of total nuclei x 100) was evaluated using the ImageJ analysis program [20].

2.4 Statistical analysis

The results of blood and intestinal content glucose, minerals and metabolites were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA using JMP® Pro 15 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Multiple comparisons among timepoints were evaluated by performing Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test (Tukey’s HSD). The results were presented as least squares means ± standard error (SE). The means were considered different when p ≤ 0.05.

3 Results

During the extracorporeal circulation, pressure and oxygenation conditions were maintained stable showing no alterations for three hours. Organ temperature was progressively increasing over time, maintaining the sub-normothermic perfusion throughout the experimental period (T0 = 15.2 °C, T1 = 17.5 °C, T2 = 18.8 °C, T3 = 19.2 °C, T4 = 20.5 °C, T5 = 21.0 °C, T6 = 22.0 °C, T7 = 23.0 °C, T8 = 23.6 °C, T9 = 24.5 °C, T10 = 25.0 °C, T11 = 25.0 °C, T12 = 25.6 °C, T13 = 25.6 °C, T14 = 25.8 °C). In general, the intestinal segment showed redness due to blood vessels reperfusion, except in the distal portion C that appeared pale and bloodless, and the peristaltic activity was observed after pinching stimulation. Reaching 25.3 °C the peristaltic contraction was noted without any external stimulation.

3.1 Glucose, mineral concentrations, organ temperature and intestinal pH

The glucose level measured in Krebs-Ringer solution was 123.67±2.31 mg/dL. The glycemia revealed a constant decreasing trend from an initial concentration of 44.00±1.20 to 27.50±0.41 mg/dL after 3 hours of extracorporeal circulation (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Glycemic levels measured for 3 hours from the extracorporeal circulation of perfused intestinal segment.

Fig 2

Data are expressed as least squared means and standard errors. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.01). First hour: hematic glucose concentrations of the first hour measured at 7 minutes intervals; Second hour: hematic glucose concentrations of the second hour measured at 30 minutes intervals; Third hour: hematic glucose concentrations of the third hour measured at 30 minutes intervals. Asterisk indicates statistically significant different values.

Considering the sampling intervals, during the first hour (T0-T8) statistically significant different concentrations were registered when comparing T0 to T5, T6, T7 and T8 (44.00±1.20, 36.50±1.20, 41.50±1.20, 38.25±1.20, 38.50±1.20 mg/dL respectively; (p < 0.001). In the course of the second (T8-T12) and third hour (T12-T14) glucose concentration gradually decreased until the end of experiment (p < 0.01). The glucose concentrations of intestinal lumen did not significantly differ from the beginning to the end of extracorporeal circulation (T0: 94.00±6.43 mg/dL; T4: 99.50±6.43 mg/dL; T8: 97.50±6.43; T12: 90.50±4.55 mg/dL; T14: 84.00±5.25).

Considering the mineral concentrations, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ and Na+ showed significant differences over the experimental time (Fig 3). In particular, Na+ blood levels raised from T0 to T4 and decreased slightly at T14, while its concentration in intestinal content was constantly reducing over time (p < 0.01). Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ blood concentrations increased significantly over time, and co-currently their concentrations in the intestinal lumen significantly dropped from T0 to T14 (p < 0.01).

Fig 3. Mineral concentrations measured over time in blood plasma and intestinal lumen content.

Fig 3

Data are expressed as least squared means and standard errors. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). a) Calcium (Ca2+) concentrations measured at T0-T7-T14 in blood and T0-T14 in intestinal lumen content; b) Magnesium (Mg2+) concentrations measured at T0-T7-T14 in blood and T0-T14 in intestinal lumen content; c) Potassium (K+) concentrations measured at T0-T7-T14 in blood and T0-T14 in intestinal lumen content; d) Sodium (Na+) concentrations measured at T0-T7-T14 in blood and T0-T14 in intestinal lumen content.

Intestinal pH showed a constant value of 7 registered for T0, T4, T8, T12 and T14.

3.2 Lactate dehydrogenase and nitrite concentrations

LDH blood concentrations revealed a persistent trend over time even if statistically significant differences were observed only in T3 and T4 compared to T14 (T3: 0.77±0.05 OD, T4: 0.85±0.05 OD and T14: 1.08±0.05 OD; p < 0.05; Table 1). Intestinal lumen content registered raising concentrations of LDH from T4 to T14 (p < 0.0001).

Table 1. Lactate dehydrogenase concentrations measured over time in blood and intestinal lumen content.

Timepoint Blood (OD) Lumen (OD)
T0 0.93±0.05ab 0.32±0.02a
T1 0.99±0.05ab
T2 0.81±0.05ab
T3 0.77±0.05a
T4 0.84±0.05a 0.34±0.02a
T5 0.87±0.05ab
T6 0.82±0.05ab
T7 0.89±0.05ab
T8 0.89±0.05ab 0.50±0.02b
T9 0.86±0.05ab
T10 0.92±0.05ab
T11 0.83±0.05ab
T12 0.92±0.05ab 0.80±0.02c
T13 1.01±0.05ab
T14 1.08±0.05b 1.36±0.02d
p-value 0.0256 < 0.0001

Data are expressed as least squared means and standard errors.

Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05).

OD: optical densities measured at 490 nm of wavelength.

Nitrite ion concentrations were below the detection level of the assay for the entire experimental period (< 1.56 μM).

3.3 Histological evaluation of the intestinal segment

In all examined portions (A, B, C), the intestinal architecture was preserved. A diffuse moderate infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells and lesser numbers of neutrophils was present in the intestinal mucosa, consistent with a diffuse moderate subacute enteritis. Moderate hyperemia was present in portions A and B (Fig 4). The intestinal epithelium of A and B portions were similar in terms of a slight de-epithelialization in the apical part of villi (Fig 4A and 4B). On the contrary, the intestinal portion C showed absence of erythrocytes within blood vessels (impaired perfusion) and a diffuse necrosis of villi was visible (Fig 4C). Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed 47.58% of proliferating epithelial cells in portion A, 35.01% in portion B and 33.72% in portion C (Fig 5).

Fig 4. Histology of the perfused intestinal tract at the end of the 3 hours of extracorporeal circulation (H&E stain, 100x, scale bar = 200 μm).

Fig 4

Portions A and B were overall well preserved and perfused, as demonstrated by blood vessels engorged with erythrocytes (arrowheads). In portion C, blood vessels are not evident (impaired perfusion) and necrosis of villi (*) was present. Hematoxylin eosin of intestinal A, B and C portions.

Fig 5. Proliferation of intestinal crypt epithelial cells.

Fig 5

Immunoperoxidase staining for ki67, 400x, scale bar = 20 μm in portions A, B, and C.

4 Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the possibility to develop an alternative perfused intestinal segment model to study the nutrient bioaccessibility and bioavailability targeting to provide more complete data compared to in vitro models. It is important to consider that this model is more advanced if compared to a classic ex vivo model which do not provide extracorporeal circulation. This model was obtained following the surgery techniques used for in vivo organ transplantations in order to preserve the organ viability and architecture during the entire experimental period [13].

Glucose bioaccessibility was evaluated due to its relevance in vivo as energetic marker derived from starch and sugar digestion. The glucose level is considered a marker of cell proliferation, viability [21, 22] and functionality for the metabolic activity [23]. The initial glycemic level (44.00±1.20 mg/dL) could be considered low if compared to the normal range of swine species (from 80 to 120 mg/dL) [24, 25]. The observed initial hypoglycaemia could be due to the animal fasting before slaughtering procedures. The glycemic trend showed a decreasing curve suggesting the utilization of glucose by erythrocytes and intestinal cells and the impossibility to store sugars in the intestinal tissue after blood perfusion. We observed a peak of glucose absorption at 7 minutes of extracorporeal circulation, and after the first hour a drop of 18% was registered. Even without registering significant differences, endoluminal content of glucose showed decreasing concentrations probably due to the low amount of glucose consumed by erythrocytes for their metabolism [26]. However, the observed results suggested that glucose was transported through its traditional mechanism. Glucose uptake is mediated via the Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) localized on the enterocytes membrane and its basolateral transport to the blood circulation is mediated primarily by the Glucose Transporter 2 (GLUT2) [27]. Glucose absorption is a complex mechanism also mediated by pancreas and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone [28]. In this study, the glucose absorption could not be mediated by hormonal asset [29] since it can be fully assessed only in vivo. The glucose concentration used was based on the defined level for the Krebs-Ringer solution as intraluminal nutrient medium. The low intraluminal glucose concentration [30] confirmed the organ metabolism without registering osmotic damage [31], even if it was not possible to evaluate a kinetic curve of its uptake [14]. Observed results suggest that glucose could be considered an interesting marker for further application of this perfusion model for the evaluation of functional feed additives which are meant to improve gut health and nutrient utilization [32, 33].

Minerals are essential inorganic nutrients that have to be exclusively acquired from the diet [34]. Minerals concentration was evaluated as indirect indicator of intestinal function as they do not require digestion to be absorbed. Na+ concentration in blood displayed a significant increase from T0 to T7 and decreased from T7 to T14. In the meantime, the intestinal lumen content of Na+ dropped significantly from T0 to T14. The observed increase in osmolarity suggested that Na+ uptake and utilization was maintained during the extracorporeal circulation. The absorption of Na+ is associated with glucose uptake from Sodium-Glucose Transporters (SGLT1) [35]. In this model, the physiologic separation of vascular, interstitial, and intracellular sections was conserved, and the blood concentration of Na+ required to maintain a correct balance of its level in the interstitial matrix.

K+ is one of the most important minerals for the acid-base and osmotic pressure balance [36]. K+ is the most abundant intracellular cation and its plasma level is lower than sodium abundance [37]. Similar to what observed for Na+, K+ levels increased in blood and decreased in lumen content from T0 to T14.

Mg2+ is one of widely abundant minerals in the animal body, and it is involved in several pivotal processes such as energy production, muscular contraction and nervous impulses transferring [38]. The observed increased Mg2+ plasma concentration suggests its absorption from intestinal lumen. In our study, Mg2+ blood level showed a drop from T0 to T7 probably due to epithelial utilization of this mineral. Subsequently, the Mg2+ concentration increased from T7 to T14 indicating its absorption from the lumen content. The intestinal lumen levels of Mg2+ significantly dropped from T0 to T14 indicating a duodenal uptake through passive and facilitated diffusion processes [39]. Ca2+ absorption is achieved through the active transport and passive diffusion [40]. Its absorption is related to the Mg2+ presence, involving the ATP-dependent ionic pumps that transfer Ca2+ in the extracellular space exchanging calcium with Na+ [41]. Mg2+ could be also indirectly influenced by Na+ and K+ concentrations since it is involved in the activity of the sodium-potassium pump [42]. Gastrointestinal system and kidneys closely regulate Mg2+ absorption and elimination [43], and its intestinal active and passive uptake mechanisms seem to do not be under hormonal control [44]. For this reason, Mg2+ concentration could be considered a translational parameter to in vivo, that indicates the nutrients’ bioaccessibility in the following perfusion model.

In line with the registered trend of Mg2+, Ca2+ levels significantly raised in blood and dropped in the intestinal lumen content. Ca2+, Mg2+ and K+ plasma concentrations showed a decrease in case of enteritis in vivo which can impair the absorption functionality of the gut epithelium [45, 46]. In our duodenum perfusion segment model, luminal and plasma mineral concentrations demonstrated that the bioaccessibility of these nutrients was maintained over three hours of extracorporeal circulation.

The lactate dehydrogenase is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of lactate to pyruvate. LDH measurements offer a non-invasive and objective indication of mucosal cellular integrity since the extracellular localization of LDH is associated with an epithelial tissue injury [47]. LDH blood concentrations did not show any difference over time even if higher numerical values were registered after 3 hours. During an organ injury LDH is released from dead cells and its concentration increases both in plasma and intestinal content [48]. In addition, LDH is strongly correlated with hemoglobin release in blood vessels due to hemolysis [49]. The registered levels of LDH in plasma suggests that peristaltic pump and pressure conditions used for extracorporeal circulation were suitable in terms of erythrocytes integrity [50]. The perfused intestinal segment model showed a progressive increase of luminal concentration of LDH suggesting a progressive damage of epithelial mucosa, consistent with the intestinal de-epithelialization and necrosis observed during the histological evaluation.

In this model, LDH concentrations in plasma and intestinal lumen content could be considered as reliable indirect marker to assess organ viability over time.

In line with Sundaram et al. [51], nitric oxide was not detectable, probably due to the limited ability of swine enterocytes to produce NO2-.

The preservation of tissue integrity before and during the experimentation is pivotal to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of data [52]. Histological evaluation revealed that the overall intestinal architecture was preserved after 3 hours, with a visible blood perfusion and only a slight de-epithelialization of villi in portions A and B, while in portion C perfusion was absent and a diffuse loss of intestinal villi was observed. In this distal portion the nutrient absorption was likely impaired. Intestinal proliferation was highest in proximal portion A with a progressive decrease in B and C, supporting a reduced vitality in particular in the distal portion C. In the examined portions of duodenum, the observed enteritis was considered a spontaneous finding not unexpected in a farming pig. The progressive impairment of section C structure and tissue death could lead to a gradual necrosis that could involve the entire intestinal segment if the perfusion time had been extended. Preservation of epithelial structures for 3 hours was proposed as the optimal period to optimize organ viability in ex vivo studies [53]. The observed increase in LDH was likely due to the de-epithelization of the intestinal mucosa. Hyperemia observed in the portions A and B was probably due to high pressure conditions, even if the selected parameters were in accordance with previous studies. Future development of the following model will target to ensure a complete perfusion by shortening the segment and perfection the surgery technique in order to store the complete vessels’ architecture that could have influenced the blood perfusion in distal section. In this model, pressure conditions require to be adapted in accordance with the size of the considered intestinal segment, and this aspect will require further adaptations in order to perfection this model. Literature studies demonstrated that UW solution provides better conservation of patches through prolonged ischemia compared to other solutions [54]. Further studies are needed to assess the glucose absorption trough perfusion of higher glucose concentrations through the intraluminal line. In addition, more data are required to investigate and optimize the luminal nutrition in order to maximize the organ viability and the conservation of intestinal structure for longer periods.

5 Conclusions

The developed swine perfused intestinal segment model showed characteristics of organ viability and functionality over three hours of extracorporeal circulation. The duodenum segment preserved the principal nutrients bioaccessibility, cellular metabolism, and, at histological evaluation, showed a preserved intestinal epithelial lining in the perfused portions. This study offered encouraging results for the development of a novel swine intestinal segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrients bioaccessibility in line with the 3R principle. Future studies will be useful to improve the organ viability and structures conservation, considering the potential of this model also for application to translational medicine for intestinal transplantations.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the APC central fund of the University of Milan.

Data Availability

All relevant data are available within the paper.

Funding Statement

This research was financially supported by Lombardy Region (funding number: POR FESR 2014–2020_BANDO Call HUB Ricerca e Innovazione_D.G.R. NR 727 del 5 November 2018), within the project "MIND FoodS Hub (Milano Innovation District Food System Hub): Innovative concept for the eco-intensification of agricultural production and for the promotion of dietary patterns for human health and longevity through the creation in MIND of a digital Food System Hub", awarded to LR. This study was also financially supported by the APC Central Fund of the University of Milan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ross AC, Caballero B, Cousins RJ, Tucker KL, Ziegler TR. Modern nutrition in health and disease: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Domínguez Díaz L, Fernández-Ruiz V, Cámara M. The frontier between nutrition and pharma: The international regulatory framework of functional foods, food supplements and nutraceuticals. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2020;60(10):1738–46. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1592107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Novik G, Savich V. Beneficial microbiota. Probiotics and pharmaceutical products in functional nutrition and medicine. Microbes and Infection. 2020;22(1):8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2019.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hull MA. Nutritional prevention of colorectal cancer. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2021;80(1):59–64. doi: 10.1017/S0029665120000051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Devle H, Ulleberg EK, Naess-Andresen CF, Rukke E-O, Vegarud G, Ekeberg D. Reciprocal interacting effects of proteins and lipids during ex vivo digestion of bovine milk. International Dairy Journal. 2014;36(1):6–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jin IS, Yoon MS, Park C-W, Hong JT, Chung YB, Kim J-S, et al. Replacement techniques to reduce animal experiments in drug and nanoparticle development. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2020;50(3):327–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Griffiths NM, Van der Meeren A, Angulo JF, Vincent-Naulleau S. Research on the Radiotoxicology of Plutonium Using Animals: Consideration of the 3Rs—: Replace, Reduce, Refine. Health physics. 2020;119(1):133–40. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blume C, Davies DE. In vitro and ex vivo models of human asthma. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2013;84(2):394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lueangsakulthai J, Sah B, Scottoline B, Dallas D. Survival of Recombinant Monoclonal Antibodies (IgG, IgA and sIgA) Versus Naturally-Occurring Antibodies (IgG and sIgA/IgA) in an Ex Vivo Infant Digestion Model. Nutrients. 2020;12(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baydoun M, Treizeibre A, Follet J, Vanneste S, Creusy C, Dercourt L, et al. An Interphase Microfluidic Culture System for the Study of Ex Vivo Intestinal Tissue. Micromachines. 2020;11(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Salehi P, Zhu JZ, Castillo EG, Avila J, Lakey J, Churchill TA. Preserving the mucosal barrier during small bowel storage1. Transplantation. 2003;76(6):911–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ziegeler S, Raddatz A, Hoff G, Buchinger H, Bauer I, Stockhausen A, et al. Antibiotics modulate the stimulated cytokine response to endotoxin in a human ex vivo, in vitro model. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica. 2006;50(9):1103–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01112.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stangl M, Krapp J, Theodorou D, Eder M, Hammer C, Land W, et al. Computer-assisted ex vivo, normothermic small bowel perfusion. European surgical research. 2000;32(2):100–6. doi: 10.1159/000008747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hamed M, Barlow A, Dolezalova N, Khosla S, Sagar A, Gribble F, et al. Ex vivo normothermic perfusion of isolated segmental porcine bowel: a novel functional model of the small intestine. BJS open. 2021;5(2):zrab009. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thuong M, Ruiz A, Evrard P, Kuiper M, Boffa C, Akhtar MZ, et al. New classification of donation after circulatory death donors definitions and terminology. Transplant International. 2016;29(7):749–59. doi: 10.1111/tri.12776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lauronen J, Pakarinen MP, Pirinen P, Kuusanmãki P, Raivio P, Savilahti E, et al. Effects of extrinsic denervation with or without ischemia–reperfusion injury on constitutional mucosal characteristics in porcine jejunoileum. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2001;46(3):476–85. doi: 10.1023/a:1005674426690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guibert EE, Petrenko AY, Balaban CL, Somov AY, Rodriguez JV, Fuller BJ. Organ preservation: current concepts and new strategies for the next decade. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. 2011;38(2):125–42. doi: 10.1159/000327033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Biolley C, Tretola M, Bee G, Jud C, Silacci P. Punicalagin increases glutamate absorption in differentiated Caco-2 cells by a mechanism involving gene expression regulation of an EAAT3 transporter. Food & function. 2019;10(9):5333–8. doi: 10.1039/c9fo00191c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alexandre F, Fabiani J. Circolazione extracorporea. EMC-Tecniche Chirurgiche-Chirurgia Generale. 2010;10(1):1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rasband WS. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.2011.
  • 21.Li Y, Schilling T, Benisch P, Zeck S, Meissner-Weigl J, Schneider D, et al. Effects of high glucose on mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2007;363(1):209–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.08.161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.MacIver NJ, Jacobs SR, Wieman HL, Wofford JA, Coloff JL, Rathmell JC. Glucose metabolism in lymphocytes is a regulated process with significant effects on immune cell function and survival. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2008;84(4):949–57. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0108024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Clara R, Schumacher M, Ramachandran D, Fedele S, Krieger JP, Langhans W, et al. Metabolic adaptation of the small intestine to short-and medium-term high-fat diet exposure. Journal of cellular physiology. 2017;232(1):167–75. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Uc A, Olivier AK, Griffin MA, Meyerholz DK, Yao J, Abu-El-Haija M, et al. Glycaemic regulation and insulin secretion are abnormal in cystic fibrosis pigs despite sparing of islet cell mass. Clinical science. 2015;128(2):131–42. doi: 10.1042/CS20140059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lombardi P, Musco N, Calabrò S, Tudisco R, Mastellone V, Vastolo A, et al. Different carbohydrate sources affect swine performance and post-prandial glycaemic response. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2020;19(1):421–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nossol C, Barta-Böszörményi A, Kahlert S, Zuschratter W, Faber-Zuschratter H, Reinhardt N, et al. Comparing two intestinal porcine epithelial cell lines (IPECs): morphological differentiation, function and metabolism. PloS one. 2015;10(7):e0132323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Croset M, Rajas F, Zitoun C, Hurot J-M, Montano S, Mithieux G. Rat small intestine is an insulin-sensitive gluconeogenic organ. Diabetes. 2001;50(4):740–6. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.4.740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Giacchetti G, Sechi LA, Rilli S, Carey RM. The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, glucose metabolism and diabetes. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2005;16(3):120–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2005.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Khan A, Pessin J. Insulin regulation of glucose uptake: a complex interplay of intracellular signalling pathways. Diabetologia. 2002;45(11):1475–83. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0974-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, et al. The impact of food bio-actives on gut health. Vitro and ex vivo models. 2015:83–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Quan G-B, Han Y, Yang C, Hu W-B, Liu M-X, Liu A, et al. Inhibitory effect of trehalose on phosphatidylserine exposure, osmotic fragility and membrane lipid peroxidation damage of erythrocytes induced by high concentration of glucose. Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi. 2008;16(6):1442–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sotira S, Dell’Anno M, Caprarulo V, Hejna M, Pirrone F, Callegari ML, et al. Effects of Tributyrin Supplementation on Growth Performance, Insulin, Blood Metabolites and Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglets. Animals. 2020;10(4):726. doi: 10.3390/ani10040726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miragoli F, Patrone V, Prandini A, Sigolo S, Dell’Anno M, Rossi L, et al. Implications of Tributyrin on Gut Microbiota Shifts Related to Performances of Weaning Piglets. Microorganisms. 2021;9(3):584. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Samat NA, Yusoff FM, Rasdi NW, Karim M. Enhancement of live food nutritional status with essential nutrients for improving aquatic animal health: A review. Animals. 2020;10(12):2457. doi: 10.3390/ani10122457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Navale AM, Paranjape AN. Glucose transporters: physiological and pathological roles. Biophysical reviews. 2016;8(1):5–9. doi: 10.1007/s12551-015-0186-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Baloš MŽ, Jakšić S, Knežević S, Kapetanov M. Electrolytes–sodium, potassium and chlorides in poultry nutrition. Archives of Veterinary Medicine. 2016;9(1):31–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Udensi UK, Tchounwou PB. Potassium homeostasis, oxidative stress, and human disease. International journal of clinical and experimental physiology. 2017;4(3):111. doi: 10.4103/ijcep.ijcep_43_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gröber U, Schmidt J, Kisters K. Magnesium in prevention and therapy. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):8199–226. doi: 10.3390/nu7095388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Scillitani A, Pugliese F, Salcuni AS, Carnevale V. Regolazione del metabolismo del calcio, del fosfato e del magnesio. L’Endocrinologo. 2020;21(5):348–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Duan P, Yuan X, Gan S, Zhang Y, Duan W. Time delay induces saw-tooth calcium wave and transition in intracellular calcium oscillation. Chinese Journal of Physics. 2020;66:150–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Veklich T, IuIu M, Kosterin S. Mg2+, ATP-dependent plasma membrane calcium pump of smooth muscle cells. I. Structural organization and properties. Ukrainian biochemical journal. 2015;87(1):5–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rodrigues AM, Silva DB, Miranda MF, Braga da Silva SC, Canton Santos LE, Scorza FA, et al. The Effect of Low Magnesium Concentration on Ictal Discharges In A Non-Synaptic Model. International Journal of Neural Systems. 2021;31(04):2050070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Al Alawi AM, Al Badi A, Al Huraizi A, Falhammar H. Magnesium: The recent research and developments. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2021;96:193–218. doi: 10.1016/bs.afnr.2021.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vormann J. Magnesium: nutrition and metabolism. Molecular aspects of medicine. 2003;24(1–3):27–37. doi: 10.1016/s0098-2997(02)00089-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bhat AA, Wadhwa DR, Singh SP, Singh I. Haematological and biochemical analysis in canine enteritis. Vet World. 2013;6(7):380–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kimmel SE, Waddell LS, Michel KE. Hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia associated with protein-losing enteropathy in Yorkshire terriers: five cases (1992–1998). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2000;217(5):703–6. doi: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sreenivasan PK, Kakarla VVP, Sharda S, Setty Y. The effects of a novel herbal toothpaste on salivary lactate dehydrogenase as a measure of cellular integrity. Clinical oral investigations. 2021;25(5):3021–30. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03623-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mura M, Andrade CF, Han B, Seth R, Zhang Y, Bai X-H, et al. Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute lung injury and oncotic cell death in multiple organs. Shock. 2007;28(2):227–38. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000278497.47041.e3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sullivan I, Faulds J. Lactate dehydrogenase and Haemolysis Index as quality control markers of haemolysis in intra-operative cell salvage. Transfusion medicine. 2013;23(5):326–9. doi: 10.1111/tme.12065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Poder T, Boileau JC, Lafrenière R, Thibault L, Carrier N, de Grandmont MJ, et al. Quantitative assessment of haemolysis secondary to modern infusion pumps. Vox sanguinis. 2017;112(3):201–9. doi: 10.1111/vox.12486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sundaram TS, Giromini C, Rebucci R, Baldi A. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids counteract inflammatory and oxidative damage of non-transformed porcine enterocytes. Animals. 2020;10(6):956. doi: 10.3390/ani10060956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sjöberg Å, Lutz M, Tannergren C, Wingolf C, Borde A, Ungell A-L. Comprehensive study on regional human intestinal permeability and prediction of fraction absorbed of drugs using the Ussing chamber technique. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;48(1–2):166–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sutton ME, op den Dries S, Karimian N, Weeder PD, de Boer MT, Wiersema-Buist J, et al. Criteria for viability assessment of discarded human donor livers during ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion. PloS one. 2014;9(11):e110642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.de Sousa SG, Nascimento da Silva GV, AM CR, da Silva MF, Costa FC, Santana de Macedo B, et al. Organ Preservation Solutions in Transplantation: A Literature Review. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation: Official Journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation. 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer

13 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-35014Swine intestinal segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrients bioaccessibilityPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rossi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Minor revision. The reviewers have recommended the possibility of a publication, but suggest some revisions to your manuscript. I kindly invite you to respond to the reviewers' comments and revise your manuscript accordingly.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 27 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. "PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: " ext-link-type="uri" xlink:type="simple">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ"

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This paper decribes an attempt to use a porcine intestinal segment to use as an ex vivo model for nutrient bioavailability. It is well though of and competently written study with some limitations that are however pointed out by the authors. These limitations derive from the fact that this is considered a preliminary study that should be followed by additional research. My main criticism that I want to be addressed by the authors is there is a lack of discussion on the potential effect on the reported results of the de-epithelization and necrosis observed in segment C. The authors should also hypothesize its effect across time since this is a time-dependent process. Also they should be more specific in the last paragraph before the conclusion section (L282-284) considering their future approach steps would they consider to maximize organ viability and intestinal structure. Finally I have made several corrections/suggestions to improve the final manuscript and pointed out some sentences that need rephrasing to make them clearer. These minor comments are included as cooments using the adobe acrobat tools in the attached file.

Reviewer #2: The European policies on animal experimentation are aiming to increase the protection of experimental animals, thus various alternative methods have to be developed to achieve this purpose. Thus, reliable science based models are required in order to reduce and replace animals for experimental purposes.

In this study, a perfusion model of the porcine duodenal segment was developed for the evaluation of the bioaccessibility and functionality of nutrients over time. The duodenum segment showed characteristics of vitality and functionality of the organ over three hours of extracorporeal circulation. It also preserved the bioaccessibility of the main nutrients, the cellular metabolism and, on histological evaluation, showed a preserved intestinal epithelial lining in the perfused portions.

This study offered encouraging results for the development of a novel porcine intestinal segment perfusion model for the assessment of nutrient bioaccessibility in line with the 3Rs principle.

The manuscript is well written and well organized. The information presented are new and interesting and the conclusions are supported by the data. The Introduction introduces the topic sufficiently. The methodology is sufficiently detailed to allow the experiments to be reproduced. The results of this work will be very useful for further studies and they were also appropriately discussed. Finally, the quality of the English is adequate.

In my opinion the manuscript is acceptable for publication.

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35014.pdf

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0283825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283825.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-35014

Swine intestinal segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrients bioaccessibility

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rossi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Minor revision. The reviewers have recommended the possibility of a publication, but suggest some revisions to your manuscript. I kindly invite you to respond to the reviewers' comments and revise your manuscript accordingly.

==============================

5. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: This paper decribes an attempt to use a porcine intestinal segment to use as an ex vivo model for nutrient bioavailability. It is well though of and competently written study with some limitations that are however pointed out by the authors. These limitations derive from the fact that this is considered a preliminary study that should be followed by additional research. My main criticism that I want to be addressed by the authors is there is a lack of discussion on the potential effect on the reported results of the de-epithelization and necrosis observed in segment C. The authors should also hypothesize its effect across time since this is a time-dependent process. Also they should be more specific in the last paragraph before the conclusion section (L282-284) considering their future approach steps would they consider to maximize organ viability and intestinal structure. Finally I have made several corrections/suggestions to improve the final manuscript and pointed out some sentences that need rephrasing to make them clearer. These minor comments are included as cooments using the adobe acrobat tools in the attached file.

Authors: Thank you so much for your constructive discussion. The progressive impairment of section C structure and tissue death could lead to a gradual necrosis that could involve the entire organ. The future aim for the enhancement of the following model will target to ensure a complete perfusion by shortening the segment and perfection the surgery technique in order to store vessels’ architecture that could have influenced the blood perfusion in distal section (C) (Lines 274-282). The paper has been revised according to your comments/corrections. Find our response point-by-point to your comments in the attached PDF file.

Reviewer #2: The European policies on animal experimentation are aiming to increase the protection of experimental animals, thus various alternative methods have to be developed to achieve this purpose. Thus, reliable science based models are required in order to reduce and replace animals for experimental purposes.

In this study, a perfusion model of the porcine duodenal segment was developed for the evaluation of the bioaccessibility and functionality of nutrients over time. The duodenum segment showed characteristics of vitality and functionality of the organ over three hours of extracorporeal circulation. It also preserved the bioaccessibility of the main nutrients, the cellular metabolism and, on histological evaluation, showed a preserved intestinal epithelial lining in the perfused portions.

This study offered encouraging results for the development of a novel porcine intestinal segment perfusion model for the assessment of nutrient bioaccessibility in line with the 3Rs principle.

The manuscript is well written and well organized. The information presented are new and interesting and the conclusions are supported by the data. The Introduction introduces the topic sufficiently. The methodology is sufficiently detailed to allow the experiments to be reproduced. The results of this work will be very useful for further studies and they were also appropriately discussed. Finally, the quality of the English is adequate.

In my opinion the manuscript is acceptable for publication.

Authors: We are grateful for the time that you dedicated to our manuscript, and we are glad that the submitted paper could be suitable for publication.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35014_Responses to Reviewer 1.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer

20 Mar 2023

Swine intestinal segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrients bioaccessibility

PONE-D-22-35014R1

Dear Dr. Rossi,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer

6 Apr 2023

PONE-D-22-35014R1

Swine intestinal segment perfusion model for the evaluation of nutrients bioaccessibility

Dear Dr. Rossi:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35014.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35014_Responses to Reviewer 1.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are available within the paper.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES