Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284248

“Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID–19: The AKICOV multicenter study in Catalonia”

Arsenio De La Vega Sánchez 1,2,#, Ana Navas Pérez 3,#, Marcos Pérez-Carrasco 1,2,*, María Torrens Sonet 4, Yolanda Diaz Buendia 5, Patricia Ortiz Ballujera 6, Miguel Rodríguez López 7, Joan Sabater Riera 8, Aitor Olmo-Isasmendi 9, Ester Vendrell Torra 10, María Álvarez García-Pumarino 11, Mercedes Ibarz Villamayor 12, Rosa María Catalán Ibars 13, Iban Oliva Zelaya 14, Javier Pardos Chica 15, Conxita Rovira Anglès 16, Teresa M Tomasa-Irriguible 17, Anna Baró Serra 18, Edward J Casanova 19, Francisco J González De Molina 20,#; on behalf of The AKICOV Group
Editor: Jordi Camps21
PMCID: PMC10104297  PMID: 37058544

Abstract

This study describes the incidence, evolution and prognosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critical COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave. We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study of confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to 19 intensive care units (ICUs) in Catalonia (Spain). Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, drug and medical treatment, physiological and laboratory results, AKI development, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and clinical outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis for AKI development and mortality were used. A total of 1,642 patients were enrolled (mean age 63 (15.95) years, 67.5% male). Mechanical ventilation (MV) was required for 80.8% and 64.4% of these patients, who were in prone position, while 67.7% received vasopressors. AKI at ICU admission was 28.4% and increased to 40.1% during ICU stay. A total of 172 (10.9%) patients required RRT, which represents 27.8% of the patients who developed AKI. AKI was more frequent in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) ARDS patients (68% vs 53.6%, p<0.001) and in MV patients (91.9% vs 77.7%, p<0.001), who required the prone position more frequently (74.8 vs 61%, p<0.001) and developed more infections. ICU and hospital mortality were increased in AKI patients (48.2% vs 17.7% and 51.1% vs 19%, p <0.001) respectively). AKI was an independent factor associated with mortality (IC 1.587–3.190). Mortality was higher in AKI patients who required RRT (55.8% vs 48.2%, p <0.04). Conclusions There is a high incidence of AKI in critically ill patients with COVID-19 disease and it is associated with higher mortality, increased organ failure, nosocomial infections and prolonged ICU stay.

Introduction

Novel coronavirus infection is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). On 30 January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak to be the sixth Public Health Emergency of International Concern. On 11 February 2020, the WHO named the disorder coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Although it manifests mainly as an acute respiratory disease, Covid-19 can affect multiple organs, including the kidneys and the heart, the digestive tract, the blood, and the nervous system [1]. The first data from China suggested that fewer than 1% of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had acute kidney Injury (AKI), however several subsequent studies have shown a considerable increase in renal impairment [24], and have linked this damage to an increase in in-hospital mortality [5]. These data have been supported by the presence of kidney damage in the autopsies of patients who died from the disease [6].

Several mechanisms related to kidney involvement in COVID-19 have been identified, including the tropism of the virus by the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in kidney cells, damage caused by the storm of cytokines, which target different organs, and common causes of acute kidney damage in patients, such as drug toxicity, prerenal factors and other causes of AKI [7]. Therefore, kidney involvement in COVID-19 is multifactorial and can have a broad clinical spectrum, and mild kidney injury may go unnoticed.

Due to the pulmonary complications produced by SARS-CoV-2, many patients required admission to intensive care units (ICU), with an increase in the already high mortality rate [8, 9]. Furthermore, AKI is a common condition in critically ill patients and has been associated with even higher morbidity and mortality rates [10].

The aim of this study is to define the burden of kidney injury and its early prognosis in critical COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to 19 ICUs in Catalonia, Spain.

Materials and methods

Study population

In the present study, 1,642 patients admitted in ICUs who were diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 1 to May 15 were recruited from 19 hospitals in Catalonia. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Sabadell (Ref 2020/621). Verbal consent for participation was requested and recorded in the patient’s medical history at each center.

Inclusion criteria

Patients included were at least 18 years old, had laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and had been admitted to a critical care area at one of the 19 hospitals in Catalonia. A confirmed case of COVID-19 was defined as a positive RT-PCR assay of a specimen collected via nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab.

Exclusion criteria

Patients were excluded if they were under 18 years old or had a non-COVID-19 related illness.

Definitions and measurements

AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) [11] criteria as follows. Stage I—An increase in serum creatinine of 0.3mg/dL within 48 hours or a 1.5 to 1.9 times increase in serum creatinine from baseline within seven days or an urine output <0.5ml/kg/h for six to twelve hours; Stage II–A 2 to 2.9 times increase in serum creatinine within seven days or urine output <0.5ml/k/h for more than 12 hours; Stage III–A threefold or more increase in serum creatinine within seven days, an increase of creatinine >4mg/dL, the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) or urine output <0.3ml/k/h for more than 24 hours or anuria for more than 12 hours. Baseline creatinine was recorded from ambulatory data records.

ARDS was defined according to the Berlin definition [12], acute respiratory failure within one week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms, chest imagining with bilateral opacities- not fully explained by effusion, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules, respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload and oxygenation criteria regarding Pa O2 /FiO2: mild 200< Pa O2 /FiO2< 300 mmHg with PEEP or CPAP ≥ 5 cmH2O, moderate 100 mmHg < Pa O2 /FiO2 < 200 mmHg with PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O, and severe Pa O2 /FiO2 < 100 mmHg with PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O.

Shock was defined as hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain mean pressure higher than 65 mmHg, and have an elevated serum lactate (more than 2 mm/l) [13].

Hepatic failure was defined as increased serum bilirubin more than 1,9 mg/dL following criteria for liver failure used in the SOFA score [14].

Thrombocytopenia was defined less than 150.000 u/dL and coagulopathy an alteration of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in laboratory test made at ICU admission.

Neurological alteration at admission was defined as a mayor neurological alteration, excluding symptoms like headache, nausea, dizziness or vomiting. We consider neurological alteration altered mental state, encephalitis, encephalopathy or vascular disorder.

There was no unified protocol of treatment and all treatments, including RRT, were started by clinician decision.

Data collection

The data were collected from on-line REDCap, to which a medical team added the information recorded at their hospitals. Data collected include demographic data, comorbidity including hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [15], asthma (GEMA 2012), diabetes mellitus [16], chronic kidney disease (CKD) any other disease diagnosed at admission, community treatment, APACHE II and SOFA scores, COVID-19 treatment received, AKI incidence and severity grade on the KDIGO/AKIN scale, the need for renal replacement therapy, the need for mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic support, mortality and other events at admission.

Statistical analyses

The descriptive statistical analyses performed include means and SDs for normally distributed continuous measures, medians and IQRs for skewed continuous measures, and frequency and proportions for categorical measures. We compared baseline patient characteristics between patients with and without AKI using the Chi-squared test or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. A multivariate analysis was performed with logistic regression to identify the factors associated with AKI and mortality. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was conducted using StataCorp. 2019. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.

Results

Demographics and characteristics of COVID-19 patients

The baseline characteristics of the COVID-19 patients with AKI admitted to the ICU compared with non-AKI patients are outlined in Table 1. Patients with AKI were significantly older than those in the non-AKI group (66 vs 60.7, p<0.001), a higher proportion were men (76.8% vs 61.3%, p<0.001) and they had higher severity score (APACHE II 15 vs 11, p<0.001 and SOFA 7 vs 4, p<0.001).

Table 1. Patient characteristics at ICU admission.

General Data Global AKI No AKI p
(n = 1642) (n = 618, 40.1%) (n = 923, 59.9%)
Age median, year (IQR) 63.0 (54.0,69.9) 66.0 (58.8,71.7) 60.7 (51.8,68.2) <0.001
Men n (%) 1040 (67.5) 474 (76.8) 566 (16.3) <0.001
APACHE II median (IQR) 12.0 (9.0,17.0) 15.0 (11.0,20.0) 11.0 (8.0,15.0) <0.001
SOFA score median (IQR) 5.0 (3.0,7.0) 7.0 (4.0,8.0) 4.0 (3.0,6.0) <0.001
Comorbidities
    Hypertension n (%) 745 (45.5) 358 (57.9) 356 (38.6) <0.001
    Asthma n (%) 77 (4.7) 20 (3.2) 54 (5.9) 0.0019
    COPD n (%) 130 (7.9) 71 (11.5) 55 (6) <0.001
    Heart failure n (%) 16 (1) 9 (1.5) 6 (0.7) 0.114
    Chronic kidney disease n (%) 100 (6.1) 76 (12.3) 22 (2.4) <0.001
    Chronic liver disease n (%) 52 (3.2) 26 (4.2) 18 (2) 0.009
    Pregnancy n (%) 4 (0.2) 1 (0.2) 2 (0.2) 1.00
    BMI median, (kg/m2) (IQR) 28.4 (25.7,32.0) 28.7 (26.0,32.7) 28.2 (25.6,31.6)
    Obesity BMI >30 n (%) 517 (31.5) 223 (42.5) 278 (36.2) 0.024
    Obesity BMI >40 n (%) 54 (3.3) 26 (5) 28 (3.7) 0.251
    Diabetes mellitus n (%) 372 (22.7) 190 (30.7) 175 (19) <0.001
    HIV infection 2 (0.1) 2 (0.3) 0 (0) 0.161
    Chronic coronary syndrome n (%) 76 (4.6) 41 (6.6) 34 (3.7) 0.008
    Autoimmune disease n (%) 53 (3.2) 23 (3.7) 28 (3) 0.459
Community Treatment
    ACEi n (%) 345 (21) 176 (28.5) 158 (17.1) <0.001
    ARBs n (%) 200 (12.2) 94 (15.2) 96 (10.4) 0.005
    β-blockers n (%) 149 (9.1) 83 (13.4) 62 (6.7) <0.001
    Diuretics n (%) 178 (10.8) 94 (15.2) 78 (8.5) <0.001
    NSAID´s n (%) 79 (4.8) 38 (6.1) 41 (4.4) 0.136
    Statins n (%) 377 (23) 181 (29.3) 184 (19.9) <0.001
    Anticoagulant therapy n (%) 60 (3.7) 32 (5.2) 26 (2.8) 0.017

IQR- Interquartile range. BMI- Body Mass Index

AKI- Acute kidney injury

COPD- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

HIV- Human immunodeficiency virus

ACEi- Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

ARBs- Angiotensin II receptor blockers

NSAIs- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Regarding comorbidities, the most frequent pathology associated with COVID-19 was hypertension in 745 patients (57.9% vs 38.6%, p<0.001), followed by obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) >30) (34.8%).

ICU admission and organic dysfunction

At admission into the ICU, the diagnostic was viral pneumonia in 1,553 cases (94.6%). AKI (467 cases, corresponding to 28.4%) was the most frequent organic dysfunction in the group of COVID-19 patients, followed by shock in 447 cases (27.2%). All the organic dysfunctions at admission were significantly related with AKI (Table 2).

Table 2. ICU admission and organic dysfunction.

Global AKI No AKI p
(n = 1642) (n = 618, 40.1%) (n = 923, 59.9%)
Diagnosis at admission
Viral pneumonia n (%) 1553 (94.6) 600 (97.1) 899 (97.4) 0.712
COPD exacerbation n (%) 16 (1) 8 (1.3) 8 (0.9) 0.417
Acute asthma n (%) 17 (1) 5 (0.8) 12 (1.3) 0.366
Heart failure n (%) 23 (1.4) 14 (2.3) 9 (1) 0.041
Other n (%) 47 (2.9) 134 (21.7) 103 (11.2) 0.362
Severity of the ARDS <0.001
Mild n (%) 127 (7.9) 28 (4.6) 92 (10.1)
Moderate n (%) 514 (32.7) 168 (27.5) 330 (36.3)
Severe n (%) 935 (59.4) 416 (68) 488 (53.6)
Organic dysfunction at admission
Shock n (%) 447 (27.2) 276 (44.7) 155 (16.8) <0.001
AKI n (%) 467 (28.4)
Hepatic failure n (%) 291 (17.7) 158 (25.6) 131 (14.2) <0.001
Coagulopathy n (%) 245 (14.9) 134 (21.7) 103 (11.2) <0.001
Neurological alteration n (%) 189 (11.5) 102 (16.5) 83 (9) <0.001
Thrombocytopenia n (%) 169 (19.3) 100 (16.2) 68 (7.4) <0.001

COPD- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ARDS- Acute respiratory distress syndrome

AKI- Acute kidney injury.

COVID-19 treatment and coinfection at admission

Bacterial coinfection at admission to the ICU was not common in COVID-19 patients, with only 84 cases (5.3%), and with Streptococcus pneumoniae as the most frequent coinfection. During admission to the ICU, almost all patients received antibiotics 1439 (97.1%), with Azithromycin 1194 (72.7%) and Ceftriaxone 1095 (66.7%) being the most common. Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Meropenem were used in 469 (28.6%) and 375 (22.8%) cases respectively.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, different treatments were proposed (Table 3): hydroxychloroquine was used in 1,443 cases (90.8%), followed by Lopinavir/ritonavir in 949 cases (60.8%), other treatments being Tocilizumab in 527 cases (35.4%) and Remdesivir in 29 cases (2%). Treatment with corticosteroids was significantly more frequently used in AKI group (52.2% vs 47.4%, p = 0.048), especially as a treatment for shock in AKI group (7.1% vs 1%, p <0.001). There were no differences in other treatments between the AKI group and the non-AKI group, though interferon beta was more frequently used in the AKI group (169 cases, 29.5%) than in the non-AKI group (168 cases, 19.5%).

Table 3. Treatments and support.

Global AKI No AKI p
(n = 1642) (n = 618, 40.1%) (n = 923, 59.9%)
COVID-19 treatment
Hydroxychloroquine/ Chloroquine. n (%) 1443 (90.8) 553(89.8) 840 (91.2) 0.345
Lopinavir/Ritonavir. n (%) 949 (60.8) 358 (60.1) 552 (60.4) 0.899
Remdesivir. n (%) 29 (2.0) 11 (2.0) 18 (2.1) 0.925
Interferon b. n (%) 352 (23.5) 169 (29.5) 168 (19.1) <0.001
Tocilizumab. n (%) 527 (35.4) 182 (32.6) 327 (37.2) 0.073
Corticosteroids 756 (49.2) 310 (52.6) 425 (47.4) 0.048
for shock n (%) 53 (3.2) 44 (7.1) 9 (1.0) <0.001
for ARDS n (%) 645 (39.3) 248 (40.1) 378 (41.0) 0.747
for asthma/bronchial hyperreactivity n (%) 67 (4.1 27 (4.4) 39 (4.2) 0.891
Hemodynamic support
Noradrenaline n (%) 1112 (67.7) 518 (83.8) 560 (60.7) <0.001
Dobutamine n (%) 27 (1.6) 20 (3.2) 6 (0.7) <0.001
Dopamine n (%) 7 (0.4) 4 (0.6) 3 (0.3) 0.448
Adrenaline n (%) 11 (0.7) 8 (1.3) 3 (0.3) 0.033
Levosimendan n (%) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 1.000
Respiratory Support
Oxygen n (%) 924 (56.33) 349 (56.5) 547 (59.3) 0.276
High-flow nasal cannula n (%) 651 (39.6) 214 (34.6) 412 (59.3) <0.001
Non-invasive ventilation n (%) 307 (18.7) 125 (20.2) 172 (18.6) 0.438
Mechanical ventilation n (%) 1326 (80.8) 568 (91.9) 717 (77.7) <0.001
Prone position n (%) 1058 (64.4) 462 (74.8) 563 (61) <0.001
ECCO2R n (%) 7 (0.4) 5 (0.8) 2 (0.2) 0.124
ECMO n (%) 42 (2.9) 19 (3.1) 23 (2.5) 0.491

ARDS- Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ICU- Intensive care unit

ECCO2R- extracorporeal membrane carbon dioxide removal

ECMO- Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

AKI- Acute kidney injury.

The use of corticosteroids during the COVID-19 pandemic was limited to other complications and not directly related to COVID-19 treatment. In this study, ARDS was the main reason for their use and they were used in 645 (39.3%) of the patients with no difference between groups. Other indications were shock and asthma or bronchial hyperreactivity.

Significantly more patients with AKI required invasive mechanical ventilation, namely 568 patients (91.9%) vs 717 (77.7%), of whom 462 (74.8%) needed to be placed in the prone position in the AKI group, which is significantly more than in the non-AKI group. Ventilation with high flow nasal cannula was more common in the non-AKI group.

Hemodynamic support was needed during ICU admission. Noradrenaline was the most frequently used treatment for hypotension and its use was significantly different between the two groups (AKI group: 518 (83.8%) vs 560 (60.7%) in the non-AKI group, p<0.001). Likewise, the use of Dobutamine was higher in the AKI group than in the non-AKI group. Other supports, such as Adrenaline, Dopamine and Levosimendan, were used in selected patients.

Acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury was the most common complication at admission to the ICU (Table 4). Baseline creatinine was higher in the AKI group (0.9 vs 0.76, p<0.001), creatinine at hospital and ICU admission was significantly higher in the AKI group. The use of nephrotoxic drugs was higher in the AKI group (50.5% vs 41.4%, p<0.001). AKI evolution during admission was transitory AKI (<72h) in 188 (31.1%) patients, between 72 hours and seven days in 209 (34.5%) and more than seven days in 208 (34.4%) patients. Creatinine levels at hospital discharge were higher in the AKI group (0.96 vs 0.62, p<0.001). A total of 172 (10.9%) patients required renal replacement therapy, which represents 27.8% of the patients who developed AKI, of whom 151 (91.5%) had a KDIGO stage III AKI. Anuric state and hypervolemia were the most frequent indications for RRT.

Table 4. Characteristics of acute kidney injury.

Global AKI No AKI p
(n = 1642) (n = 618, 40.1%) (n = 923, 59.9%)
Baseline creatinine 0.80(0.27) 0.90 (0.32) 0.76 (0.29) <0.001
Creatinine at admission 0.87 (0.43) 1.10 (0.64) 0.80 (0.27) <0.001
ICU admission creatinine 0.80 (0.46) 1.18 (0.71) 0.70 (0.27) <0.001
Creatinine at discharge 0.7 (0.47) 0.96 (1.08) 0.62 (0.28) <0.001
Use of nephrotoxics n (%) 711 (43.4) 312 (50.5) 382 (41.4) <0.001
AKI evolution
Transitory <72h n (%) 188 (31.1)
>72h to < 7d n (%) 209 (34.5)
>7d n (%) 208 (34.4)
RRT n (%) 172 (10.9) 172 (27.8)
RRT indication
Hypervolemia n (%) 85 (49.4)
Pulmonary edema n (%) 3 (1.7)
Anuric n (%) 109 (63.4)
Hyperkalemia n (%) 56 (32.6)
Uremic syndrome n (%) 52 (30.2)
Sepsis n (%) 32 (18.6)
Severity of AKI at RRT start
KDIGO I n (%) 4 (2.4)
KDIGO II n (%) 10 (6.1)
KDIGO III n (%) 151 (91.5)

AKI- Acute kidney injury

RRT- Renal replacement therapy

h-Hour. d-days.

ICU complications and outcomes

During admission to the ICU, multiple complications were detected in COVID-19 patients. In our study, we focused on infectious and thrombotic events (Table 5). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was the most common complication in our study with 477 cases (30.5%). The AKI group had significantly more cases of VAP than the non-AKI group (37.7% vs 25.6%, p<0.001). Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) occurred in 280 patients (18%) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) in 229 (14.8%). Thrombotic events, such as acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, were detected in 236 (15.3%) patients, with differences between groups.

Table 5. Complications and outcome.

Global AKI No AKI p
(n = 1642) (n = 618, 40.1%) (n = 923, 59.9%)
Complications
Ventilator-associated pneumonia n (%) 477 (30.5) 229 (37.7) 231 (25.6) <0.001
Catheter-related bloodstream infections n (%) 280 (18.0) 126 (20.9) 145 (16.0) 0.015
Urinary tract infections n (%) 229 (14.8) 112 (18.6) 111 (12.4) 0.001
Thrombotic events n (%) 236 (15.3) 109 (18.1) 118 (13.2) 0.010
Outcome
Length stay in ICU median (IQR) 14.0 (6.0,27.0) 18.0 (8.0,33.0) 12.0 (5.0,24.0) <0.001
Length stay in Hospital median (IQR) 26.5 (15.0,44.0) 29.0 (16.0,52.0) 25.0(15.0,39.0) 0.002
ICU mortality n (%) 469 (29.7) 296 (48.2) 162 (17.7) <0.001
Global mortality n (%) 493 (31.2) 311 (51.1) 172 (19) <0.001

ICU–Intensive Care Unit

IQR- Inter Quartile Range.

ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) were also analyzed, and there were significant differences between the AKI group and the non-AKI; hospital LOS (28 vs 24 days, p 0.002) and ICU LOS (18 days vs 11 days, p <0.001).

COVID-19 related mortality ICU was significantly higher in the AKI group than in the non-AKI group (48.2% vs 17.7%, p<0.001). Moreover, overall mortality was significantly higher in the AKI group (51.1% vs 172 19%, p<0.001) and in patients who required RRT (55.8%).

Discussion

This is the first multicenter study of 19 ICUs in a specific region during the first wave of the pandemic that presents the characteristics of COVID-19 critically ill patients who developed AKI, showing increased mortality and hospital stay. Catalonia was one of the most affected regions in Spain, with a total of 55,196 COVID-19 infections and a high volume of patients requiring ICU admission [17].

Initially, several studies suggested that AKI was not frequently seen in COVID-19 patients [18], being in accordance with the progress of the pandemic as one of the most major complications [19, 20]. Other complications showed major differences between studies: for example, Klok FA et al. [21] reported a 31% rate of thrombotic events, while others, such as Gupta A et al. [20], reported a 10.3% rate of thrombotic events. Myocardial injury, with an elevation of cardiac biomarkers, occurred in 20–30% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, with higher rates (55%) among those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease [22, 23]. Among AKI patients, the presence of another organic dysfunction such as liver failure, coagulopathy or neurological disorder was more frequent. Additionally, those patients were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and develop a severe ARDS. All these conditions coincide with higher severity scores (APACHE II and SOFA) at admission, similar to the patients in our study.

Although this study includes only critically ill patients admitted to ICU, AKI incidence is similar to that described by Hirsch JS et al. [24] who found an incidence of 36% among the 5,449 patients admitted to hospitals in New York from March 1 to April 5, 2020. Furthermore, a total of 1,395 (25.6%) were critically ill patients, most of them required mechanical ventilation and 1,060 patients (75%) developed AKI. Piñeiro et al. [25] analyzed 52 critically ill patients with COVID-19 and AKI admitted to ICU, our AKI incidence is higher (40.1% vs 21.4%), by highlighting more patients with BMI >30 (42.5% vs 21.2%) and younger (66y vs 71y), despite this differences RRT requirement and AKI mortality are similar (27.5% vs 28.5%; 51.1% vs 52%). Zheng X et al. [26] described that kidney injury of some kind occurred in 42% of the two cohorts that they analyzed, though only 6% of those patients developed a KDIGO criteria of AKI. Among critically ill patients, 30% developed AKI during admission and 9% had pre-hospital AKI. In another study analysing AKI incidence in COVID patients Chung M et al. [27] describe that AKI occurred in 1,406 (46%) patients overall, when referring to critically ill patients the incidence rises to 68% (admission plus new cases).

Finally, a multi-center study in Belgium [28] describes 85.1% of AKI incidence in critically ill patients. These large differences between studies may be explained by the important differences between the populations analyzed and the different definitions of AKI used in the studies. Hirsch JS et al. [24] used the KDIGO score but not urine output due to a lack of data, while an algorithm was used to calculate baseline creatinine because only 15% had records with baseline creatinine [17]. Chung M et al. [27] define AKI as at least an increase in peak serum creatinine of 0.3 mg/dL or 50% above baseline, while for patients without a baseline creatinine measurement, creatinine at admission was imputed based on a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) estimated glomerular filtration fraction (eGFR) of 75 ml/min/1.73m as per Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI guidelines [11]. Higher incidence in the Belgium cohort could partially explain by the use of the urinary output criteria and the high proportion of obese patients in the AKI group (one-third) and the use of actual body weight for calculation of UO as mL/kg/h.

In our study, hypertension, COPD, BMI >30, CKD, and diabetes mellitus were the comorbidities associated with the AKI group, and these findings are consistent with those described in previous studies [4, 29, 30]. Obesity was the most frequent independent comorbidity in critically ill COVID patients who developed AKI.

Different treatments have been proposed during the pandemic. In our study, patients received Hydroxychloroquine, Beta interferon, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Tocilizumab and 29 patients were administered Remdesivir. None of these therapies has been related with a greater risk of AKI in previous studies and there was no difference in our study between the AKI group and the non-AKI group. Remdesivir and AKI were analyzed by Wang et al. but no relation was observed. Lopinavir/ritonavir has been related with acute interstitial nephritis in HIV patients but not with COVID-19 patients [31].

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients underwent significant changes in treatment protocols. However, our study found no differences between ICUs, as a unified protocol for regional assistance and a controlling center for resource distribution were in place. Antibiotics were commonly prescribed upon admission and were selected based on the local ecology of each medical center, but no significant differences were detected.

In our study, corticosteroid use was more frequent in the AKI group. The relationship between corticosteroid treatment and AKI in patients with COVID has not been directly related. Cheng et al. [5] found that patients with AKI were more likely to receive glucocorticoids on admission, along the same lines as critically ill patients [19]. Moreover, their use has been related to a decrease in the requirement of RRT [16]. In our case, the administration of corticosteroids is related to the presence of shock and ARDS, more frequent in patients who developed AKI. Unfortunately, the relationship between corticosteroids and AKI in critically ill COVID 19 remains unresolved.

A small number of studies have focused on RRT, most of which are single center studies. Most of the data about RRT has linked its use to a higher mortality rate and more severe illness [32]. Focusing on COVID and RRT, Gupta S et al. [33] describe the results of 3,099 critically ill patients with COVID19 in the United States, describing how 20.7% of the patients developed AKI-RRT and had a mortality rate above 60%. In our study, the need for RRT in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU was only 10.9%, similar to Belgium cohort [28], this could be explained by a conservative approach for initiate RRT in COVID19 patients. Mortality rate in COVID patients with AKI-RRT is 55.8%, similar to other studies [32, 33].

AKI and mortality were widely analyzed by Lim MA et al. [34] in a systematic review and meta-analysis that concluded that AKI had a RR (RR: 13.38 [8.15, 21.95]), Chung M et al. [27] conclude that in-hospital mortality in patients with AKI was 41% overall and 52% in intensive care. In this study, mortality rate (51.1%) is similar to that described in those studies when referring to critically ill patients.

This study has some limitations. Firstly, it is a descriptive study focusing on a single geographical region. Therefore, it may be difficult to generalize these findings to other regions. Secondly, the diagnosis of AKI was mainly based on creatinine and oliguria variation, without taking into account variations in urine output. Thirdly, there was no unified protocol for the treatment of COVID-19 among hospitals, no for the prevention, management of AKI or use of RRT. Finally, the study describes what happened during the first pandemic wave in which there was no standardized treatment, so there could be differences with the results obtained in the following pandemic waves in which treatment was standardized.

Conclusion

This study represents one of the largest series of critically ill COVID-19 with AKI in a specific region of Europe during the first pandemic wave, confirming their increased rate of mortality and ICU and hospital stay. Furthermore, it suggests that hypertension, COPD, BMI >30, CKD and diabetes mellitus are comorbidities associated with AKI in these patients; requiring RRT would increase their mortality.

Finally, studies involving multiple regions may be needed to understand the true incidence and involvement of AKI in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Sabadell (Ref 2020/621.)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the members of the AKICOV group and the respective study collaborators at each intensive care unit: Carolina Maldonado and Abrahan Mera, Department of Critical Care, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital; Mireia Cerdà Martínez, Loreley Betancourt Castellanos, Gemma Gomà Fernández, Critical Care Center, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari; María del Mar Fernández, Enrique Piacentini Intensive care Department, Mútua Terrassa University Hospital; Ana Segarra Martínez-Sahuquillo, Intensive Care Department. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau; Anna Horta Puig, Intensive Care Department. Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona; Susana Hernandez Marín, Beatriz Cancio Rodriguez and Arantxa Mas Serra, Critial care department. Hospital del Baix Llobregat Moises Broggi; Miguel Angel Gordillo Benítez, Intensive Care department. Bellvitge university hospital; Sandra Barbadillo Ansorregui, Critical Care department Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya Sant Cugat del Vallès; Cristina Pedrós Mas, Intensive Care Department. Hospital General de Granollers; Federico Esteban Reboll, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona; Laura Raguer-Pardo, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital Intensive Care Department.

Abbreviations

ACE2

angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

AKI

Acute kidney injury

APACHE

Acute physiology and chronic health disease classification system

APPT

Activated partial thromboplastin time

ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BMI

Body mass index

CKD

chronic kidney disease

COPD

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019

CRBSIs

Catheter-related bloodstream infections

eGFR

estimated glomerular filtration fraction

ICU

Intensive care unit

KDIGO

Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes

MDRD

Modification of diet in renal disease

MV

Mechanical ventilation

PT

Prothrombin time

RRT

Renal replacement Therapy

RT-PCR

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

SOFA

Sequential organ failure assessment

UTI

Urinary tract infections

VAP

Ventilator associated pneumonia

WHO

World health organization

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Naicker S, Yang CW, Hwang SJ, Liu BC, Chen JH, Jha V. The Novel Coronavirus 2019 epidemic and kidneys. Kidney International. 2020;97(5):824–828. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gabarre P, Dumas G, Dupont T, Darmon M, Azoulay E, Zafrani L. Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(7):1339–1348. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06153-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, et al. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2020;395(10236):1569–1578. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney International. Published online 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Santoriello D, Khairallah P, Bomback AS, et al. Postmortem Kidney Pathology Findings in Patients with COVID-19. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2020;31(9):2158–2167. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020050744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ronco C, Reis T. Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2020;16(6):308–310. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-0284-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association. 2020;323(16):1574–1581. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guan W jie, Ni Z yi, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382(18):1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peerapornratana S, Manrique-Caballero CL, Gómez H, Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury from sepsis: current concepts, epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment. Kidney International. 2019;96(5):1083–1099. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.05.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, et al. Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney International Supplements. 2012;2(1):1–138. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012. Jun 13;307(23):2526–33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016. Feb 23;315(8):801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, de Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10. doi: 10.1007/BF01709751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.GesEPOC G de T de. SEPAR: Guía de Práctica Clínica para el Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Pacientes con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica (EPOC)–Guía Española de la EPOC (GesEPOC). Versión 2017. Arch Bronconeumol. 2017;53(Supl 1):2–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rydén L, Grant PJ, Anker SD, et al. Guía de práctica clínica de la ESC sobre diabetes, prediabetes y enfermedad cardiovascular, en colaboración con la European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2014;67(2):136.e1-136.e56. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2013.10.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Equipo COVID-19, RENAVE, CNE, CNM (ISCIII). Informe sobre la situación de COVID-19 en España. Published 2020. Accessed March 31, 2021. https://www.isciii.es/QueHacemos/Servicios/VigilanciaSaludPublicaRENAVE/EnfermedadesTransmisibles/Documents/INFORMES/Informes COVID-19/Informe no 32. Situación de COVID-19 en España a 21 de mayo de 2020.pdf
  • 18.Wang L, Li X, Chen H, et al. Coronavirus disease 19 infection does not result in acute kidney injury: An analysis of 116 hospitalized patients from Wuhan, China. American Journal of Nephrology. 2020;51(5):343–348. doi: 10.1159/000507471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2020;8(5):475–481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Sehgal K, et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Nature Medicine. 2020;26(7):1017–1032. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0968-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, van der Meer NJM, et al. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thrombosis Research. 2020;191(April):145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, et al. Association of Cardiac Injury with Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiology. 2020;5(7):802–810. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, et al. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiology. 2020;5(7):811–818. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hirsch JS, Ng JH, Ross DW, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Kidney International. 2020;98(1):209–218. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Piñeiro GJ, Molina-Andújar A, Hermida E, et al. Severe acute kidney injury in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Journal of Nephrology. 2021;34(2):285–293. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00918-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zheng X, Yang H, Li X, et al. Article Prevalence of Kidney Injury and Associations with Critical Illness and Death in Patients with COVID-19. Published online 2020:1–8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04780420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chung M, Deshpande P, Farouk SS, et al. Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. Published online 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.04.20090944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schaubroeck H, Vandenberghe W, Boer W, Boonen E, Dewulf B, Bourgeois C, et al. Acute kidney injury in critical COVID-19: a multicenter cohort analysis in seven large hospitals in Belgium. Crit Care. 2022. Jul 25;26(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04086-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk Factors Associated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020;180(7):934–943. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Popkin BM, Du S, Green WD, et al. Individuals with obesity and COVID‐19: A global perspective on the epidemiology and biological relationships. Obesity Reviews. 2020;21(11). doi: 10.1111/obr.13128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Parkhie SM, Fine DM, Lucas GM, Atta MG. Characteristics of patients with HIV and biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2010;5(5):798–804. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08211109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Metnitz PGH, Krenn CG, Steltzer H, et al. Effect of acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy on outcome in critically ill patients. Critical Care Medicine. 2002;30(9):2051–2058. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gupta S, Coca SG, Chan L, et al. AKI Treated with Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19.: 1–16. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020060897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lim MA, Pranata R, Huang I, Yonas E, Soeroto AY, Supriyadi R. Multiorgan Failure With Emphasis on Acute Kidney Injury and Severity of COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease. 2020;7. doi: 10.1177/2054358120938573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jordi Camps

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

24 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-33365Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID–19: the AKICOV multicenter study in CataloniaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pérez-Carrasco,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it can be accepted after slight changes suggested by the Reviewer. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 10 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jordi Camps

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The article can be accepted after taking into account the comments of the reviewer

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: A very interesting study.

Avoid abbreviations not explained in the abstract.

Also in the text when using the abbreviations explain them the first time they are used, see RRT.

The material and method need to be defined: ARDS, organic dysfunction,

Describing the usual treatments of the patients and those used during admission brings originality to the study, there are few that describe them.

Have differences been observed between the participating hospitals in terms of these treatments?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284248.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Mar 2023

Dear Reviewers of PLOS One,

We would like to express our gratitude for taking the time to review our article titled "Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19: the AKICOV multicenter study in Catalonia." Your constructive feedback and suggestions were extremely helpful in improving the quality of the article.

We are writing to inform you of the changes we made based on your feedback:

1- “Avoid abbreviations not explained in the abstract” and “Also in the text when using the abbreviations explain them the first time they are used, see RRT”. We have explained all abbreviations used in the abstract and manuscript, as suggested in your comments.

2- “The material and method need to be defined: ARDS, organic dysfunction”. We included definitions for all the dysfunctions used in the study, as you recommended.

3- “Describing the usual treatments of the patients and those used during admission brings originality to the study, there are few that describe them”. We have expanded the discussion section to include a more detailed description of the usual treatments given to patients and those used during admission, as you noted that few studies have done so.

4- “Have differences been observed between the participating hospitals in terms of these treatments?”. We have explained in the discussion that no significant differences were detected between ICUs, likely due to a regional unified protocol being established.

Yours faithfully,

Marcos Pérez Carrasco Arsenio de la Vega Sánchez

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Jordi Camps

27 Mar 2023

Insuficiencia renal aguda en pacientes críticos con COVID-19: el estudio multicéntrico AKICOV en Cataluña

PONE-D-22-33365R1

Dear Dr. Pérez-Carrasco,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

PD: The title has been written in Spanish in the web page, although it is in English in the manuscript. Please, correct.

Kind regards,

Jordi Camps

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Jordi Camps

5 Apr 2023

PONE-D-22-33365R1

“Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID–19: the AKICOV multicenter study in Catalonia”

Dear Dr. Pérez-Carrasco:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jordi Camps

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES