Abstract
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is a widespread flavor enhancer and stabilizer in manufactured or packaged foods that possess myriad adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MSG on placental progesterone receptors and fetal development. Thirty pregnant Wistar Albino rats were divided into three groups (ten/each). The control group (G1) gavaged distilled water only, low-dose treated group (G2) gavaged 3 g/kg MSG, and high-dose treated group (G3) gavaged 6 g/kg MSG from 1st to 18th days of gestation, and all pregnant rats were sacrificed on the 19th day of gestation. The effect of MSG on fetal weights, crown vertebral length (CVL), placental weight, placental ghrelin expression, and fetal skeleton examination were estimated. MSG induced a significant decrease in fetal weights, CVL lengths, placental weight, and ghrelin expression in both treatment groups compared to the control group. Several parts of the fetal skeleton showed incomplete ossification and delayed chondrification in which high-dose maternally treated fetuses were more affected. Many degenerative changes were detected in both maternal and fetal liver and kidney tissues in MSG-treated groups. Moreover, MSG caused a significant increase in serum ALT, ALP, and creatinine levels in pregnant rats’ blood. Serum progesterone was only elevated in G3 on the 19th day of gestation. This study showed that the administration of MSG during pregnancy adversely influences fetal growth and skeletal development and caused several biochemical and histological changes in the maternal and fetal liver and kidney tissues which assure the toxic and teratogenic effects of MSG.
Keywords: Ghrelin, MSG, Progesterone, Teratogenicity, Toxicity, Liver, Kidney
Introduction
In the last decade, most people prefer consuming fast foods that contain low fiber but high energy rather than natural or little-treated foods due to changes in lifestyle (Bryant and Dundes 2008, Dongen et al. 2010). Flavors and flavor enhancers are used to bring out the flavor in a wide range of foods without adding a flavor of their own, improving the palatability of the food distinctly (Elhariry et al. 2004). Flavorings are vital in savory food manufacturing and could play an important nutritional role by providing needed appeal (Löliger 2000).
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is one of the most used flavor enhancers worldwide. It is a non-essential amino acid found in high protein food products such as meat, fish, certain types of cheese and vegetables (Yamaguchi and Ninomiya 2000, Wifall et al. 2006, Shigemura et al. 2009, Kochem and Breslin 2017). MSG has a unique taste (umami) (Kurihara 2015, Stańska and Krzeski 2016). MSG was identified 100 years ago by Kikunae Ikeda which is the fifth basic taste, in addition to sweet, sour, salty, and bitter. In addition to its basic specificity, the umami taste can enhance overall flavor intensity and improve food palatability (Zanfirescu et al. 2019). It is considered a flavoring agent, being used thoroughly in industrialized food. Its production increased from 200.000 tons/year in 1969 to 3 million tons per year being consumed in the global market in 2021, which reflects its crescent use in the food industry (Hermanussen et al. 2006, Nakamura and Itsub 2021). Moreover, MSG is artificially added to food for providing an expansion and extension of taste, whereas it stimulates receptors located in taste buds (Taylor-Burds et al. 2004, Diniz et al. 2005).
The safety and toxicity of MSG have become controversial in the last few years because of reports of adverse reactions in people who have eaten foods that contain MSG. Many studies have confirmed such adverse reactions (Obochi et al. 2009, Meraiyebu et al. 2012). MSG has been reported to cause headaches, vomiting, diarrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, asthma attacks in asthmatic patients, and panic attacks (Hall et al. 1996). Moreover, MSG is shown to have side effects on different body systems; studies reported that diets that contained food additives affected brain neurotransmission, psychological status, behavior, and memory, especially in children (Zeisel 1986, Löwik 1996, Pollitt et al. 1996, Umukoro et al. 2015, Zanfirescu et al. 2019, Akataobi 2020). Moreover, it is believed that MSG can induce obesity; pregnant women who consumed MSG during the gestational period could have a connection with future obesity of the newborn, who suffered from hypothalamic lesions while being in the uterus (Fernández-Tresguerres 2006, Hermanussen et al. 2006).
Administration of any teratogen at the gestation period negatively influenced fetal body weight and differentiation especially when they are administered during the organogenesis period (Carlson 2009). MSG was shown to penetrate placental barrier and distribute almost evenly among embryonic tissues (Gao et al. 1994, Abu Elnaga et al. 2019).
Ghrelin is a hormone that acts as an endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue receptor (Kojima et al. 1999). This hormone is produced from the stomach, kidney (Mori et al. 2000), hypothalamus (Korbonits et al. 2001), pancreas (Date et al. 2002), and placenta (Gualillo et al. 2001); however, the principal source is the gastrointestinal tract. Placental ghrelin plays a pivotal role in the differentiation and growth of placental cells, modulates growth hormone production and influences fetal development (Nakahara et al. 2006).
Some studies reported the adverse effects of MSG on the female reproductive system (Miskowiak and Partyka 1999, Mondal et al. 2018), but studies of its possible impact on the placental progesterone and fetal development are lacking. Thus, the main aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of MSG on progesterone level, fetal growth which judged by placental ghrelin expression and skeletal abnormalities in Wistar Albino rats.
Materials and methods
Animals
Thirty adult virgin female rats and ten male Wistar Albino rats were used in this study. Their weights ranged from 200 to 220 g. Rats were obtained from the Animal House of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. Animals were kept under standard conditions and allowed free access to food and water. The animals were kept in a natural day-night cycle at room temperature 25 ± 2 °C and kept for 2 weeks for adaptation. The technical standards and international guidelines for research on animals were followed according to the ethical guidelines for animal use in laboratory experiments of the Faculty of Veterinary, Suez Canal University, Egypt (02019020). Only female rats that completed at least two consecutive estrous cycles were used in the present study (Ekambaram et al. 2017). Three females in proestrus were mated with one fertile male per cage overnight. The presence of a vaginal plug or sperm in the vaginal smears the next morning was considered the zero-day of pregnancy (Piesta et al. 2009). Pregnant rats were weighed daily to follow-ups on their pregnancy.
Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
The MSG was provided in the form of white crystalline powder and fast-soluble in water, supplied by Merck Co., USA (CAS No. 6106-04-3). Monosodium glutamate was dissolved in distilled water, and the dose for each rat was determined according to its respectable body weight.
Experimental design
Thirty pregnant Wistar Albino rats were divided into three groups ten pregnant rats for each. Control group (G1) gavaged distilled water only, low-dose treated group (G2) gavaged 3 g/kg MSG, and the high-dose treated group (G3) gavaged 6 g/kg MSG according to Eweka and Om’Iniabohs (2007) from the 1st to 18th days of gestation. All pregnant females were observed on daily basis throughout gestation.
Morphological examination
Maternal body weights were measured day after day, and the percent of maternal body weight gain was calculated according to the following equation:
All the pregnant rats were sacrificed under tetrahydrofuran inhalation anesthesia on day 19th of gestation, and then uterine horns were removed and freshly photographed. The fetuses were removed from the uterus and cleaned before being weighed and photographed. The uterine shape, number of living and dead fetuses, the fetal crown vertebral length (cm), the fetal weight (g), the placental weight (g), and the presence of external malformations were recorded.
Skeletal preparation
Skin, viscera, adipose tissue, and eyes were detached from fetuses and kept in 95% ethyl alcohol for 4 days followed by acetone for 1 day to remove the fat. Fetuses were double stained for cartilage and bone (Alizarin red S plus Alcian blue staining), according to Inouye (1976). Then, the stained fetuses were washed with water and placed in 1% aqueous KOH to remove soft tissue and then put ascending series of glycerol and 1% aqueous KOH solution until preserved in 100% glycerin. Skeletal systems of fetuses from different groups were photographed and examined for the presence or absence of ossification centers, and any abnormality of bone was recorded.
Blood sampling and blood parameters
At the 7th, 14th, and 19th days of gestation, blood samples were collected from the eye using the orbital sinus technique (Sanford 1954). The blood was collected and allowed to clot, and then the serum was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 20 min, and the clear non-hemolyzed serum was collected, divided into several aliquots, and stored at – 80 °C until assayed. Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was measured using a kit provided by Abcam (Cat. No ab83369, UK), while alanine transaminase (ALT) was determined using a kit provided by DIACHEM Ltd. (Cat. No. 48261, Hungary). Serum creatinine was determined by a kit provided by DIACHEM Ltd. (Cat. No. 46161, Hungary), while serum progesterone was determined by progesterone ELISA kit provided by TECAN (REF52231, Germany).
Histopathological preparation
At the 19th day of gestation, samples of the liver, kidney, and placenta of pregnant mothers beside the fetal liver and kidney were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffer formalin for the histological techniques. Then, they were dehydrated in ascending series of alcohol after washing, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin wax. The paraffin blocks were cut 5 μm in thickness and mounted on glass slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Drury and Wallington 1980).
Placental ghrelin expression
Ghrelin gene expression was assessed in rat tissues. Samples of feto-maternal junctions and placentae of day 7, day 14, and day 19 of pregnant rats from the control and MSG-treated groups were collected in RNA stabilizing reagent. Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen Co, cat no 74104, USA) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Samples were subjected to RNase-free DNase I treatment for 2 h at 37 °C. Next, RNA purity and concentration were assessed using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Tech, USA). For reverse transcription reaction, RNA samples (10 ng) and a high-capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) were used. Reactions were carried out in a Mastercycler Gradient Thermocycler (Eppendorf, Germany). Real-time PCR was employed following the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) Guidelines. The ghrelin gene was analyzed in the fetomaternal and placental tissues and then normalized to beta-actin gene with accession number “V01217” according to Langnaese et al. (2008). Primer pairs were obtained from ORIGENE Company (USA). Table 1 represents the reaction containing the cDNA template, qPCR Green Master (Jena Bioscience, Germany), forward and reverse primers, and PCR-grade water was run in StepOne Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA), as previously described.
Table 1.
Gene | Forward | Reverse |
---|---|---|
Gherlin | CCAGAGGACAGAGGACAAGC | AGTTGCAGAGGAGGCAGAAGCT |
ACTB | AAGTCCCTCACCCTCCCAAAAG | AAGCAATGCTGTCACCTTCCC |
The fold change of mRNA expressions in each tissue sample was calculated relative to the control tissues via Livak and Schmittgen (2001) method based on the quantitative cycle (Cq) values with the following equation: relative quantity = 2−ΔΔCq.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s (IMB-SPSS version 28.0 for Mac OS) for comparing the means value obtained in the different groups (Knapp 2017). Data were represented as mean ± SE, and significance was defined as P < 0.05. Being non-parametric, a logistic transformation of gene expression was used. A two-way ANOVA test with the Geisser-Greenhouse correction was employed to estimate how the gene expression changes according to the levels of MSG dose and the time point of sampling simultaneously. The corrected method of Benjamini and Yekutieli was computed for each comparison. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Morphological studies
The result indicated that there was a steady increase in the body weight of all pregnant rats in different groups during the gestation period. The average percentage of increase in maternal weight at the 19th day of gestation was significantly higher in treated groups than in control ones (Table 2). All females in the control, low, and high-dose groups have completed their pregnancy without any abortion cases; no deaths were recorded in the control or treated groups. However, MSG altered the distribution of implantation sites in the uterine horns in all treated groups (Fig. 1). Moreover, the placental weights of maternally treated fetuses were significantly decreased compared to the control. The total number of fetuses per dam showed a significant decrease as compared with controls; it was minimal in the high-dose group (Table 2).
Table 2.
Parameters | Control | Treated | |
---|---|---|---|
Low dose | High dose | ||
Initial body weight | 204 ± 2.0 a | 204.00 ± 1.9a | 209.22 ± 6.7a |
Final body weight | 227 ± 1.5b | 247.6 ± 8.0a | 253 ± 7.5a |
Maternal body weight gain | 23 ± 1.6 b | 43.6 ± 7.2a | 43.78 ± 6.7a |
% of body weight gain | 12 ± 1.0 b | 21.45 ± 3.4a | 21.5 ± 3.6a |
Total number of mother | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Total number of fetuses | 87 a | 55b | 34c |
Mean number/dam | 8.7 ± 0.27a | 5.5 ± 0.26b | 3.4 ± 0.23c |
Fetus length | 3.70 ± 0.048a | 3.44 ± 0.056b | 3.31 ± 0.067b |
Fetus weight | 4.53 ± 0.12a | 3.76 ± 0.079b | 3.62 ± 0.12b |
Placental weight | 0.65 ± 0.022a | 0.51 ± 0.017b | 0.47 ± 0.008b |
kinky tail | 0a | 4 (7.27%) b | 9 (26.47%) c |
Clubbed forelimbs | 0a | 3 (5.45%)b | 11 (32.35%)c |
Soft skin | 0a | 8(14.5%)b | 20 (58.8%)c |
Skeletal defects | 0a | 9(16.36%)b | 34 (100%)c |
Data represent the mean value ± S.E. from10 rat/group. Mean values with different superscript letters within the same row are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 using ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple comparison test
The morphological examination of fetuses maternally treated with a low or high-dose of MSG showed that some fetuses exhibited soft, membranous, and thin skin and kinky tail as well and others showed clubbed forelimb (Table 2, Fig. 2). Moreover, the weight and length of maternally treated fetuses were significantly decreased compared to their control. The minimal weight and length were observed among fetuses maternally treated with high-dose of MSG (Table 2).
Skeletal malformation of 19th-day rat fetuses
On day 19th of gestation, the skeletal system of a control rat showed that ossification and chondrification processes were completed. However, fetuses maternally treated with MSG showed a marked retardation ossification and delayed chondrification in some parts of the skull, sternebrae, vertebrae, pelvic girdle, pectoral girdle, fore, and hind limbs (Table 2, Fig. 3). Examination of the skull of high-dose maternally treated fetuses’ revealed absence of cartilage formation in all parts of skull (Fig. 4), while the vertebral column exhibited absence of chondrification in all vertebrae and delay in ossification of the center of the cervical vertebrae and absence of most or all caudal vertebrae (Fig. 5). The sternum exerted delay in chondrification of the sternal portion of ribs and absence of xiphoid cartilage (Fig. 6), while complete delay in chondrification of the pectoral girdle and forelimb and absence of ossified phalanges were also recorded (Fig. 7). The pelvic girdle showed absence of chondrification and a great reduction in the size of the obturator foramen (Fig. 8), and the hind showed a complete absence of chondrification in the entire limb (Fig. 9).
Biochemical parameters
The result showed that serum ALT and creatinine were significantly (p < 0.05) elevated in pregnant rats treated with low and high doses of MSG compared to control after the 14th and 19th days of gestation (Table 3). However, serum ALP was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in pregnant rats treated with low-dose MSG on the 19th day of gestation only. However, ALP was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in the 14th and 19th day of gestation in the high-dose MSG-treated pregnant rats (Table 3).
Table 3.
Time (days) | Control | Treated | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Low dose | High dose | |||
Alanine transaminase activity (U/I) | 14th day of gestation | 22.33 ± 1.84c | 32.3 ± 3.63bc | 42.36 ± 9.87b |
19th day of gestation | 23.06 ± 2.19c | 50.18 ± 10.93ab | 60.97 ± 8.45a | |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/I) | 14th day of gestation | 195.01 ± 15.96c | 200.0 ± 12.41c | 400.66 ± 42.87a |
19th day of gestation | 148.93 ± 7.04c | 203.78 ± 6.78c | 306.0 ± 20.94b | |
Creatinine level (U/I) | 14th day of gestation | 0.8 ± 0.23d | 1.83 ± 0.10bc | 1.57 ± 0.12ab |
19th day of gestation | 1.09 ± 0.25cd | 1.91 ± 0.17a | 1.78 ± 0.16ab | |
Serum progesterone level (ng/Ml) | 7th day of gestation | 54.0 ± 2.30a | 40.0 ± 1.70b | 31.0 ± 3.50c |
14th day of gestation | 62.5 ± 3.00a | 38.2 ± 0.80b | 46.5 ± 1.50c | |
19th day of gestation | 31.0 ± 3.50a | 34.5 ± 1.50a | 70.25 ± 2.00c |
Data represent the mean value ± S.E. from10 rat/group. Mean values with different superscript letters within the same row are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 using ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple comparison test
Moreover, there was a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in serum progesterone levels in pregnant rats treated with a low and high dose of MSG than control after the 7th and 14th days of gestation. However, progesterone level significantly (p < 0.05) increased only in the serum of pregnant mothers treated with high-dose MSG at the 19th day of gestation (Table 3).
Histological studies
Liver of control pregnant rats showed the normal structure of hepatic tissue with normal central and portal areas. The hepatic tissue consists of plates of polyhedral hepatocytes radially arranged around a central vein and separated by blood sinusoids. The portal areas are arranged at the peripheral angles of each lobule and contain branches from the hepatic portal vein, hepatic artery, and the bile duct (Fig. 10a,b). Microscopic examination of the liver sections of mothers treated with MSG showed different histopathological changes, which were more severe in rats given the high dose of MSG. Histological alternations included both degeneration and necrosis of some hepatocytes. Degeneration was of the hydropic and fatty types. Other hepatocytes showed different shapes of hepatic necrosis, including karyorrhexis, karyolysis, and pyknosis. Besides, dilated sinusoid and lymphocytic infiltration of inflammatory cells surrounding the portal area were also reported (Fig. 10c,d,e). Hyperplasia of bile ducts with infiltration of inflammatory cells and destruction of the area surrounding the portal veins were only noted in the liver section of high-dose MSG-treated mothers (Fig. 10f). The hepatic tissues of the 19th day of gestation control rat fetuses are composed of irregular hepatic plates formed of hepatocytes. Between the cords, sinusoids which are irregular, dilated, and lined with a discontinuous layer of endothelial and Kupffer cells are found. Numerous young, nucleated erythroblasts are found inside the sinusoids and in between the hepatic cords. Few megakaryocytes are encountered in blood sinusoids of control fetus rat liver. The liver examination of low-dosed maternally treated fetuses showed normal hepatocytes and liver structure (Fig. 11a), while the liver of highly dosed maternally treated fetuses showed hydropic degeneration, and the central and portal veins as well as blood sinusoids were congested; besides, lymphocytic infiltration was also observed (Fig. 11b,c).
Kidneys of control pregnant rats showed normal structure with regular cortex and medulla areas (Fig. 12a,b). The histopathological examination of low-dose MSG-treated mother’s kidney showed some atrophied renal corpuscle, and the epithelia of the visceral and parietal layers of some Bowman’s capsules have degenerated with dilatation of the urinary space. Besides, some cells lining the proximal and distal convoluted tubules were pyknotic, and others were degenerated (Fig. 12c,d). However, the high-dose MSG-treated mothers showed cortical regions with many atrophied and degenerated renal corpuscles, besides pyknosis and degenerated convoluted tubules, while the medullary region showed pyknotic and degenerated descending and ascending limbs of Henle’s loop and the collecting tubule (Fig. 12e,f). The kidney of the 19th-day control fetus rats was differentiated into cortex and medulla closely covered with connective tissue. The cortex contains Malpighian corpuscles and proximal and distal tubules. In contrast, the medulla contains undifferentiated mesenchymal cells and is occupied by the ascending and descending loops of Henle (Fig. 13a). The kidney examination of MSG maternally treated fetuses showed that kidney tissue lost its typical configuration; some glomeruli were atrophied, and others with degenerated glomeruli (Fig. 13b), while some renal tubules appear deteriorated (shedding out of epithelial lining the convoluted renal tubules) (Fig. 13c).
Ghrelin expression in placenta
Compared to control samples, MSG treatment was associated with significant suppression of ghrelin gene expression in the placenta at days 7, 14, and 19 groups compared to their corresponding control group (p < 0.001). Mixed-effects analysis showed a significant difference in gene expression by drug dose (p < 0.001) and time point (p = 0.001) separately. In addition, there was an interaction effect between both factors (p = 0.011). Multiple comparison analysis revealed that in the high-dose MSG groups, treatment reduced ghrelin gene expression with a mean difference of – 1.722 for day 14 vs. day 7 (q value = 0.001) and a mean difference of – 2.325 for day 19 vs. day 7 (q value = 0.007) (Fig. 14).
Discussion
Morphological studies
In the present study, pregnant females in the different experimental treated groups showed a significant increase in body weight gain during the gestation period. This result agrees with Tala’a (2019), Mohamed et al. (2017), and Savcheniuk et al. (2014). Moreover, Abd El-Aziz et al. (2014) found prolonged administration of MSG causes an initial increase in weight gain followed by terminal suppression and independent of food consumption.
The results showed that MSG altered the distribution of implantation sites in the uterine horns in all treated groups. Abu Elnaga et al. (2019) found that MSG caused the unequal distribution of implantation sites in the uterine horns and the early death of embryos. George et al. (2013) reported that a low dose of MSG (0.4 g/kg b.w) reduced the number of rat embryos and some resorbed bodies appeared. Ibrahim et al. (2012) suggested that the early death of embryos may be due to an anemic condition induced by MSG as they found that hemoglobin level and red blood cell count were indicative of an anemic condition in pregnant rats treated with MSG. Moreover, the current study showed a significant reduction in maternal serum progesterone level at the 7th day of gestation which is considered a critical period after implantation time (Yoshinaga 2018) gives an idea about early preimplantation embryonic losses due to implantation failure where high progesterone level is needed.
The influence of various chemical agents on embryos and fetuses differs according to the ontogenetic stages and gestation period (Rugh 1968, Persaud 1979). The results showed that fetuses maternally treated with MSG exhibited some developmental malformations such as thin skin, a kinky tail, and abnormal hind limb. This was in agreement with Abu Elnaga et al. (2019) who observed the absence of eyelids, ear pinna, elongated and narrowed head, edema under the skin layer, atrophied eye, and abnormal fore and hind limbs in fetuses maternally treated with MSG (7 g/10 mL/kg b. wt) in the 9th to 14th days of gestation. Other different developmental malformations were observed in chick embryos (Roongruangchai et al. 2018; Al-Ghamdi 2017; Al-Qudsi and Al- Jahdali 2012) and zebrafish (Sajjaviriya et al. 2019).
Moreover, the recorded reduction in body weight and crown-rump length of fetuses at the 19th day of gestation maternally treated with MSG were in agreement with George et al. (2013), Tawfeeq and Jarjees (2013), Abu Elnaga et al. (2019), and Gad EL-Hak et al. (2021) in rat fetuses. This may be explained by Husarova and Ostatnikova (2013) who reported that MSG decreased the pituitary gland growth hormone level which is directly responsible for fetal growth. Also, Zanfirescu et al. (2019) suggested that the reduced fetus body weight may be due to MSG induce depression in the embryonic cells’ cellular differentiation process. Also, Al-Ghamdi (2017) suggested that MSG may directly affect embryo cell metabolism, as MSG can pass through the membrane easily and affect embryo development and growth. The present study revealed that the placental weight of MSG-treated pregnant rats was decreased compared with controls. This result was inconsistent with Abu Elnaga et al. (2019) who recorded that MSG-induced placental weight decrease in treated mothers. The later results were in harmony with the reduced placental ghrelin expression in the herein study, whereas placental ghrelin plays a pivotal role in the differentiation and growth of placental cells, modulates growth hormone production, and influences fetal development (Nakahara et al. 2006).
Skeletal malformation
Many studies investigate MSG effects, but those dealing with MSG effects on the fetal skeleton are extremely limited. In the present study, the administration of MSG to pregnant rats caused a dose-dependent delay in chondrification and ossification of some parts of the axial and appendicular fetal skeleton. Dhindsa et al. (1978) found that MSG induced marked repression in the ossification of the developing endochondral bone and massive accumulation of adipose tissue with receded hemopoietic tissue within the bone marrow. They suggested that this may be due to MSG’s influence on the hydrolysis of alkaline phosphatase enzyme and glycolysis involved in the bone deposition or on secretions of hormones responsible for bone resorption.
Histological studies
The current study showed that the liver of mothers treated with different doses of MSG was markedly affected. The fatty degeneration and lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration observed in the liver of MSG-treated mothers were in agreement with Kumbhare et al. (2015), Eid et al. (2018), Othman and Jumah (2019), and Gad EL-Hak et al. (2021). Kumbhare et al. (2015) stated that the presence of these fat droplets represents the response of hepatocytes to the ingestion of MSG, while Sherlock and Dooley (1993) suggested that the fatty changes induced in the liver in pathological conditions may be due to an imbalance between the normal rates of lipids synthesis and utilization. Shakoor et al. (1982) considered lymphocytic inflammation as a prominent response of body tissues facing any injurious impacts. According to Kumbhare et al. (2015), the migration of leukocytes to the site of inflammation is known as chemotaxis and can be explained the important role of lymphocytes as a prominent response of the body toward any injuries.
The observed hepatic necrosis (karyolysis, karyorrhexis, and pyknosis) in this study was in agreement with Aji et al. (2019), Shukry et al. (2020), El-Alfy et al. (2020), and Hamza and Diab (2020). Doaa et al. (2019) suggested that liver damage induced by MSG may be due to MSG accumulation inside the hepatocytes’ mitochondria; thus, the hepatocytes will not be able to maintain themselves metabolically or structurally, and this failure results in the death and dissolution of the cell.
Dilatation and congestion of the hepatic sinusoids, and central and portal veins recorded in this study were similar to results obtained by Hussin and Tala’a (2019) and Gad EL-Hak et al. (2021). According to Haschek et al. (2013), congestion may be due to the failure of the heart, which produces changes in different organs via excessive blood in the venous system and increases blood pressure on the surrounding capillaries, which may exert undue stress in the surrounding structures.
Among the important findings of the present study was the noticeable hyperplasia of bile ducts in high-dose MSG-treated mothers. This result agreed with Eid et al. (2018) and Gad EL-Hak et al. (2021). Hyperplasia associated with acute liver injury in which an increased number of ducts are confined to the portal tract is observed (Uchida et al. 1983; Nakanuma and Ohta 1986; Popper et al. 1987; Desmet 1987). According to Slott et al. (1990), hyperplasia of bile ducts indicated bile duct obstruction observed in forms of liver disease caused by infectious or toxic agents (Popper et al. 1987).
The liver of maternally treated fetuses showed many degenerative changes. This result is consistent with Al-Ghamdi (2017), Eid et al. (2018), and Gad EL-Hak et al. (2021). Eid et al. (2018) suggested that the toxic effect of MSG on the liver of rat pups is due to MSG, which causes highly distorted central veins and distorted blood vessels as well as reduce DNA total amounts in their liver. However, Al-Mosaibih (2013) considered that the toxic effect of MSG in the fetus’ liver is due to its oxidative damage in the liver.
MSG induced prominent lesions in the kidney tissues, and these observations were in agreement with Kumbhare et al. (2015), Mustafa et al. (2015), Shredah (2017), and Eid et al. (2019). Moreover, many studies showed a strong association between MSG exposure and renal effects (Eid et al. 2019, Yousef et al. 2019). Sharma et al. (2013) suggested that exposure to MSG may harm renal function which might be due to oxidative stress induced by MSG on the renal tissue. This can be explained by a change in the threshold of tubular reabsorption and glomerular filtration rate (El-Sheikh and Khalil 2011). Moreover, cells lining proximal convoluted tubules appeared to be the tissues in the kidney most highly sensitive to MSG. They suggested that this may be because they are the first to come in contact with the toxic agent after it is filtered by the glomeruli (Kumbhare et al. 2015, Dixit et al. 2014, Ortiz et al. 2006).
Fetuses’ renal atrophy and degeneration of Malpighian corpuscles were also noted by Andrew (2007), Tawfik and Al-Badr (2012), Osman et al. (2012), Elshama et al. (2016), and AL-Khatawi et al. (2019). Park et al. (2000) and Beyreuther et al. (2007) suggested that prenatal exposure to MSG would result in histological changes in the kidney because MSG readily crossed the placenta and accumulated in fetal tissue throughout gestation. On the other hand, Amin et al. (2010) and Inetianbor et al. (2015) suggested that MSG is capable of inducing oxidative damage to the brain, heart, liver, kidneys, and reproductive organs of developing fetuses by its effect on membranes, DNA, and antioxidant defense systems of cells.
Biochemical parameters
The observed significant increases in serum ALT and creatinine in MSG-treated pregnant rats coincided with Tawfik and Al-Badr (2012), Osman et al. (2012), Sharma et al. (2013), and Gad EL-Hak et al. (2021). ALT is considered one of the cytosolic enzymes that are present exclusively in hepatocytes (Pratt and Kaplan 2000); thus, its presence in the plasma here denotes that there were deleterious effects on hepatocytes, as confirmed by histopathology that led to their damage and liberation of a such enzyme to plasma. Moreover, the elevated maternal ALP in MSG-treated pregnant mothers could be attributed to the hepatocytes function where the ALP is produced in case of biliary pressure. Moreover, it is closely related to the disturbances in hepatic secretory activities (Giannini et al. 2005, Kumar and Magon 2012). This result was consistent with the liver histopathology examination, which showed bile duct hyperplasia due to bile obstruction.
Progesterone is essential for the regulation of normal female reproductive functions. Also in the brain, its neurobehavioral expression is associated with sexual responsiveness (Genazzani et al. 2000) and in the bone prevention of bone loss (Balasch 2003). The present study showed that MSG decreased serum progesterone levels in MSG-treated pregnant rats at the 7th and 14th days of gestation. Similar results were obtained by Abu Elnaga et al. (2019) who reported that MSG increased the incidence of abortion after the reduction of progesterone hormone due to atrophic action of MSG on the ovary. In contrast at the 19th day of gestation, serum progesterone level showed a significant increase in the high MSG-treated group only. The progesterone level should be down-regulated at the end of the gestation period due to sensitization with estradiol receptors that prepare the uterus for oxytocin action and delivery (Leavitt et al. 1985). The herein results demonstrated that a high MSG-dose could impair the delivery and action of oxytocin due to failure of progesterone down-regulation at the end of gestation. This point may provide a future prospective research point.
The current study showed that treated groups showed down-regulation of Ghrelin in the placenta. Ghrelin is a gut hormone that activates its receptor, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R). Ghrelin controls bone formation and metabolism by modulating osteoblasts proliferation and differentiation (Delhanty et al. 2013, Pradhan et al. 2013). The observed delay in chondrification and ossification of some parts of the axial and appendicular fetal skeleton may be due to MSG-caused down-regulation of ghrelin in the placenta resulting in ghrelin disability to control fetal bone formation.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that pregnant rats treated with different doses of MSG at the 1st–18th days of gestation showed that MSG significantly induces many alterations in the morphological, histological, and physiological parameters under investigation. MSG was able to pass through the placenta and cause teratogenic effects on the developing fetuses as well as its pregnancy-threatening effect via altering progesterone levels. This study recommends that the uptake of MSG during pregnancy should be decreased to a minimal level due to its hazardous effects on pregnant mothers, which puts their fetuses at high risk of malformation.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Hadeer M. Shosha, Ranwa A. Elrayess, Heba M. A. Abdelrazek, Hala M. Ebaid, and Eman A. Toraih. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ranwa A. Elrayess and Eman A. Torah, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Data availability
Data supporting findings are presented within the manuscript.
Declarations
Ethics approval
This study was carried out and approved by the Committee for Ethics of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering during the handling.
Consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Abd El-Aziz GS, El-Fark MO, Hassan SM, Badawoud MH. Effects of prolonged oral intake of monosodium glutamate (MSG) on body weight and its correlation to stomach histopathological changes in male rats. Thai J Vet Med. 2014;44:201. [Google Scholar]
- Abu Elnaga NA, Sarhan M, Mansour H. Teratogenicity of monosodium glutamate on the pregnant rats and their fetuses. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2019;74(8):1737–1747. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.28580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aji DD, Mulyaningsih REM, Mzz AF. The effect of Lemon Juice (Citrus limon) in Liver Histopathologic Appearance of Male Mice (Mus musculus L.) Exposed by Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) Proc Int Conference on App Sci Health. 2019;4:135–142. [Google Scholar]
- Akataobi US. Effect of monosodium glutamate (MSG) on behavior, body and brain weights of exposed rats. Environ Dis. 2020;5(1):3–8. doi: 10.4103/ed.ed_31_19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Ghamdi F. Toxicity of Monosodium Glutamate on the liver of chick embryos and the effectiveness of pomegranate peel extract in reducing this toxicity (to show scientific miracles in the Quran and Sunnah) Life Sci J. 2017;14:37–60. [Google Scholar]
- AL-Khatawi GMG, AL-Attabi MR, Bargooth AF (2019) Physiological and histological study to the effects of monosodium glutamate in laboratory male rats and the protective role of vitamin E. Int J Pharm Qual Assu 10(02):272
- AL-Mosaibih MA. Effects of monosodium glutamate and acrylamide on the liver tissue of adult Wistar rats. Life Sci J. 2013;10(2 s):35–42. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Qudsi F, Al-Jahdali A. Effect of monosodium glutamate on chick embryo development. J Am Sci. 2012;8:499–509. [Google Scholar]
- Amin KA, Hameid HA, Abd Elsttar AH. Effect of food azo dyes tartrazine and carmoisine on biochemical parameters related to renal, hepatic function and oxidative stress biomarkers in young male rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(10):2994–2999. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andrew OE (2007) Histological studies of the effects of monosodium glutamate on the kidney of adult Wistar rats. The Internet Journal of. Health 6
- Balasch J. Sex steroids and bone: current perspectives. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(3):207–222. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beyreuther K, Biesalski HK, Fernstrom JD, Grimm P, Hammes WP, Heinemann U, Kempski O, Stehle P, Steinhart H, Walker R. Consensus meeting: monosodium glutamate–an update. Europ J Clin Nut. 2007;61(3):304–313. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bryant R, Dundes L. Fast food perceptions: a pilot study of college students in Spain and the United States. Appetite J. 2008;51:327–330. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlson BM. Human embryology and developmental. biology.4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby El sevier; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Date Y, Nakazato M, Hashiguchi S, Dezaki K, Mondal MS, Hosoda H, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Arima T, Matsuo H. Ghrelin is present in pancreatic α-cells of humans and rats and stimulates insulin secretion. Diabetes. 2002;51(1):124–129. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.1.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delhanty PJ, Neggers SJ, van der Lely AJ. Des-acyl ghrelin: a metabolically active peptide. Ghrelin Syst. 2013;25:112–121. doi: 10.1159/000346059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desmet VJ (1987) Cholangiopathies: past, present, and future. In Seminars Liver Dis 7(2):67-76. 10.1055/s-2008-1040566 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Dhindsa KS, Omran RG, Bhup R. Effect of monosodium glutamate on the histogenesis of bone and bone marrow in mice. Cells Tissues Organs. 1978;101(3):212–217. doi: 10.1159/000144969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diniz YS, Faine LA, Galhardi CM, Rodrigues HG, Ebaid GX, Burneiko RC, Cicogna AC, Novelli EL. Monosodium glutamate in standard and high-fiber diets: metabolic syndrome and oxidative stress in rats. Nutrition. 2005;21(6):749–755. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixit SG, Rani P, Anand A, Khatri K, Chauhan R, Bharihoke V. To study the effect of monosodium glutamate on histomorphometry of cortex of kidney in adult albino rats. Renal Fail. 2014;36:266–270. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.846865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doaa A, Atef H, El-sherbiny M, El-shafey M, Eslam KF, Hany A, Abd AL-Moneim A (2019) Monosodium glutamate induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress: pathophysiological, biochemical and electron microscopic study. Med J Cairo University 87: 397-406.
- Dongen M, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. Effects of snack consumption for 8 weeks on energy intake and body weight. Int J Obes. 2010;34:319–326. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drury RAB, Wallington EA. Carleton’s histological technique. 5. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Eid FA, Abu Elnaga NA, Sarhan M, Mansour H. Effect of monosodium glutamate on liver of pregnant rats and their fetuses (Histological and histochemical studies) Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;73(11):8091–8098. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.21951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eid RA, Al-Shraim M, Zaki MS, Kamar SS, Abdel Latif NS, Negm S, Al-Ani B, Haidara MA. Vitamin E protects against monosodium glutamate-induced acute liver injury and hepatocyte ultrastructural alterations in rats. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2019;43:4–5. doi: 10.1080/01913123.2019.1673860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ekambaram G, Kumar SKS, Joseph LD. Comparative study on the estimation of estrous cycle in mice by visual and vaginal lavage method. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(1):AC05–AC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23977.9148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Alfy NZ, Mahmoud MF, Eissa MI, Emam AA. Role of propolis against toxic effects of monosodium glutamate on histology and expression lipid metabolism genes of ,mice liver. Indian J Public Health. 2020;11(05):867. [Google Scholar]
- Elhariry H, Kawasaki H, Auling G. Recent advances in microbial production of flavour enhancers for the food industry. Recent Res Develop Microbiol. 2004;8:15–39. [Google Scholar]
- Elshama SS, Osman HEH, El-Kenawy AEM, Youseef HM. Comparison between the protective effects of vitamin K and vitamin A on the modulation of hypervitaminosis D3 short-term toxicity in adult albino rats. Turkish J Med Sci. 2016;46(2):524–538. doi: 10.3906/sag-1411-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Sheikh NM, Khalil FA. L-Arginine and L-glutamine as immunonutrients and modulating agents for oxidative stress and toxicity induced by sodium nitrite in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49:758–762. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-Tresguerres I, Gracia A, Canto-Pingarrón MD, Blanco-Jérez L. Physiological bases of bone regeneration I: histology and physiology of bone tissue. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:E47–E51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gad El-hak HN, Abdelrazek HM, Zeidan DW, Almallah AA, Khaled HE. Assessment of changes in the liver of pregnant female rats and their fetuses following monosodium glutamate administration. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(32):44432–44441. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13557-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao J, Wu J, Zhao XN, Zhang WN, Zhang YY, Zhang ZX. Transplacental neurotoxic effects of monosodium glutamate on structures and functions of specific brain areas of filial mice. Sheng Li Xue Bao: [Acta physiologica Sinica] 1994;46:44–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genazzani AR, Stomati M, Morittu A, Bernardi F, Monteleone P, Casarosa E, Gallo R, Salvestroni C, Luisi M. Progesterone, progestagens and the central nervous system. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(S1):14–27. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George KR, Shibija NG, Malini NA. Monosodium glutamate (MSG) induced developmental dysfunction in female albino rats (Rattus norvegicus) Bioscan. 2013;8:73–76. [Google Scholar]
- Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ. 2005;172(3):367–379. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gualillo O, Caminos J, Blanco M, Garcìa-Caballero T, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Dieguez C, Casanueva F. Ghrelin, a novel placental-derived hormone. Endocrinology. 2001;142(2):788–794. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.2.7987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall JE, Guyton AC, Brands MW. Pressure-volume regulation in hypertension. Kidney Int Suppl. 1996;55:S35–S41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamza RZ, Diab AA. Testicular protective and antioxidant effects of selenium nanoparticles on monosodium glutamate-induced testicular structure alterations in male mice. Toxicol Rep. 2020;7:254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haschek WM, Rousseaux CG, Wallig MA, Bolon B, Ochoa R. Haschek and rousseaux's handbook of toxicologic pathology. Academic Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hermanussen M, Garcia AP, Sunder M, Voigt M, Salazar V, Tresguerres JAF. Obesity, voracity, and short stature: the impact of glutamate on the regulation of appetite. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:25–31. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Husarova V, Ostatnikova D. Monosodium glutamate toxic effects and their implications for human intake: a review. J Med Sci Res. 2013;2013:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Hussin AM, Tala’a AA (2019) Adverse cytological and enzymatic effects of long term monosodium glutamate (msg) intake on liver
- Ibrahim OM. Some hematological and histological impact of sub-acute exposure to mono sodium glutamate in mice. Iraqi J Vet Med. 2012;36(0E):127–131. doi: 10.30539/iraqijvm.v36i0E.406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Inetianbor JE, Yakubu JM, Ezeonu SC. Effects of food additives and preservatives on man-a review. Asian J Sci Technol. 2015;6:1118–1135. [Google Scholar]
- Inouye M. Differential staining of cartilage and bone in fetal mouse skeleton by Alcian blue and alizarin red S. Congenit Anom. 1976;16:171–173. [Google Scholar]
- Kochem M, Breslin PA. Clofibrate inhibits the umami-savory taste of glutamate. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kojima M, Hosoda H, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature. 1999;02(6762):656–660. doi: 10.1038/45230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korbonits MR, Bustin SA, Kojima M, Jordan S, Adams EF, Lowe DG, Kangawa K, Grossman AB. The expression of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor ligand ghrelin in normal and abnormal human pituitary and other neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(2):881–887. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.2.7190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knapp H (2017) Introductory statistics using SPSS. Second edition Los Angeles:SAGE.
- Kumar P, Magon N. Hormones in pregnancy. Nigerian Med J: J Nigeria Med Assoc. 2012;53:179. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.107549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumbhare V, Gajbe U, Singh BR, Reddy AK, Shukla S. Histological & histochemical changes in liver of adult rats treated with monosodium glutamate: a light microscopic study. World J Pharm Pharma Sci. 2015;4:898–911. [Google Scholar]
- Kurihara K. Umami the fifth basic taste: history of studies on receptor mechanisms and role as a food flavor. BioMed Res Intern. 2015;2015:189402. doi: 10.1155/2015/189402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langnaese K, John R, Schweizer H, Ebmeyer U, Keilhoff G. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in a rat asphyxial cardiac arrest model. BMC Mol Biol. 2008;9(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-9-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leavitt WW, Okulicz WC, McCracken JA, Schramm W, Robidoux WF., Jr Rapid recovery of nuclear estrogen receptor and oxytocin receptor in the ovine uterus following progesterone withdrawal. J Steroid Biochem. 1985;22(6):687–691. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(85)90272-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Löliger J. Function and importance of glutamate for savory foods. J Nutr. 2000;130(4):915S–920S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.4.915S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Löwik MRH. Possible use of food consumption surveys to estimate exposure to additives. Food Addit Contam. 1996;13(4):427–441. doi: 10.1080/02652039609374428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meraiyebu A, Akintayo CO, Uzoechi AC, Okere S. The effects of orally administered monosodium glutamate (MSG) on blood thrombocyte, blood coagulation and bleeding in rats. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2012;4(1):04–08. [Google Scholar]
- Miskowiak B, Partyka M. Effect of neonatal treatment with MSG (monosodium glutamate) on thyroid of the adult male rats. Histol Histopathol. 1999;14(1):63–68. doi: 10.14670/HH-14.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohamed AA, Thabet HZ, Abdel-hafez AM. Toxicity of monosodium glutamate on male rat reproductive system and effect of curcumin and propolis co-administeration. Egyptian J Forensic Sci Appl Toxicol. 2017;17:129–146. doi: 10.21608/ejfsat.2017.46106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mondal M, Sarkar K, Nath PP, Paul G. Monosodium glutamate suppresses the female reproductive function by impairing the functions of ovary and uterus in rat. Environ Toxicol. 2018;33:198–208. doi: 10.1002/tox.22508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori K, Yoshimoto A, Takaya K, Hosoda K, Ariyasu H, Yahata K, Mukoyama M, Sugawara A, Hosoda H, Kojima M. Kidney produces a novel acylated peptide, ghrelin. FEBS Lett. 2000;486(3):213–216. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02308-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mustafa SJ, Salih TA, Yasseen HA, Marouf BH, Mohammed AI. Effect of monosodium glutamate on mice ovaries and possible protective role of vitamin C. Ann Appl Biol Sci. 2015;2:A100–A105. [Google Scholar]
- Nakahara K, Nakagawa M, Baba Y, Sato M, Toshinai K, Date Y, Nakazato M, Kojima M, Miyazato M, Kaiya H, Hosoda H, Kangawa K, Murakami N. Maternal ghrelin plays an important role in rat fetal development during pregnancy. Endocrinology. 2006;147(3):1333–1342. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura K, Itsubo N. Lifecycle assessment of monosodium glutamate made from non-edible biomass. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3951. doi: 10.3390/su13073951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nakanuma Y, Ohta G. Immunohistochemical study on bile ductular proliferation in various hepatobiliary diseases. Liver. 1986;6:205–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1986.tb01067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Obochi GO, Malu SP, Obi-Abang M, Alozie Y, Iyam MA. Effect of garlic extracts on monosodium glutamate (MSG) induced fibroid in Wistar rats. Pakistan J Nutri. 2009;8(7):970–976. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2009.970.976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz GG, Bitzer-Quintero OK, Zárate CB, Rodríguez-Reynoso S, Larios-Arceo F, Velázquez-Brizuela IE, Moisés FP, Rosales-Corral SA. Monosodium glutamate-induced damage in liver and kidney: a morphological and biochemical approach. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006;60:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2005.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osman HE, Elshama S, El-Kenawy A. Study of the role of antioxidant (vitamin C) on modulation toxicity of chronic use of monosodium glutamate in liver of Albino rats. Ain Shams J Forensic Med Clin Toxicol. 2012;19:75–87. doi: 10.21608/ajfm.2012.19538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Othman SI, Jumah MB. Histomorphological changes in mono-sodium glutamate induced hepato-renal toxicity in mice. Intern J Pharmacol. 2019;15:449–456. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2019.449.456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Park JS, Choi MA, Kim BS, Han IS, Kurata T, Yu R. Capsaicin protects against ethanol-induced oxidative injury in the gastric mucosa of rats. Life Sci. 2000;67(25):3087–3093. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00890-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Persaud TV, editor. Teratogenic mechanisms. MTP Press; 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Piesta A, Maj T, Chełmońska-Soyta A. The influence of mating on estrogen receptor alpha protein level in spleen and uterine macrophages in female mice. Reprod Biol. 2009;9(3):225–240. doi: 10.1016/S1642-431X(12)60028-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pollitt E, Jacoby E, Cueto S. School breakfast and cognition among nutritionally at-risk children in the Peruvian Andes. Nutri Rev. 1996;54:S22. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Popper H, Roth L, Purcell RH, Tennant BC, Gerin JL. Hepatocarcinogenicity of the woodchuck hepatitis virus. Proc National Acad Sci. 1987;84(3):866–870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.3.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pradhan P, Lüdeke MK, Reusser DE, Kropp JP. Embodied crop calories in animal products. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8(4):044044. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pratt DS, Kaplan MM. Evaluation of abnormal liver-enzyme results in asymptomatic patients. New England J Med. 2000;342(17):1266–1271. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004273421707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roongruangchai J, Viravud Y, Plakornkul V, Sripaoraya K, Boonmark W, Roongruangchai K. The teratogenic effects of monosodium glutamate (MSG) on the Development of Chick Embryos. Siriraj Med J. 2018;70(6):514–522. [Google Scholar]
- Rugh R. The mouse. Its reproduction and development: Oxford Science Publications; 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Sajjaviriya C, Ponpornpisit A, Pirarat N, Suthamnatpong N. Chronic toxicity of monosodium glutamate on the reproductive system and some internal organs of zebrafish (Danio rerio) Thai J Vet Med. 2019;49:335–342. [Google Scholar]
- Sanford HS. Method for obtain venous blood from the orbital sinus of the rat or mouse. Sci. 1954;119:100. doi: 10.1126/science.119.3081.100.a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savcheniuk OA, Virchenko OV, Falalyeyeva TM, Beregova TV, Babenko LP, Lazarenko LM, Demchenko OM, Bubnov RV, Spivak MY. The efficacy of probiotics for monosodium glutamate-induced obesity: dietology concerns and opportunities for prevention. EPMA J. 2014;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1878-5085-5-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shakoor A, West TR, Scholer CF. Physical characteristics of some Indiana argillaceous carbonates regarding their freeze-thaw resistance in concrete. Bull Assoc Eng Geologists. 1982;19(4):371–384. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma A, Prasongwattana V, Cha’on U, Selmi C, Hipkaeo W, Boonnate P, et al. Monosodium glutamate (MSG) consumption is associated with urolithiasis and urinary tract obstruction in rats. Public Library Sci. 2013;8:e75546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherlock S, Dooley J. The liver in infancy and childhood. Diseases of the liver and biliary system. London: Blackwell; 1993. p. 455474. [Google Scholar]
- Shigemura N, Shirosaki S, Sanematsu K, Yoshida R, Ninomiya Y. Genetic and molecular basis of individual differences in human umami taste perception. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shredah MT. Molecular study to the effect of monosodium glutamate on rat gingiva. Tanta Dental J. 2017;14(3):155. doi: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_21_17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shukry M, El-Shehawi AM, El-Kholy WM, Elsisy RA, Hamoda HS, Tohamy HG, Abumandour MM, Farrag FA (2020) Ameliorative effect of graviola (Annona muricata) on mono sodium glutamate-induced hepatic injury in rats: antioxidant, apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, lipogenesis markers, and histopathological studies. Animals 10(11): 1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Slott PA, Liu MH, Tavoloni N. Origin, pattern, and mechanism of bile duct proliferation following biliary obstruction in the rat. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:466–477. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91030-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stańska K, Krzeski A. The umami taste: from discovery to clinical use. Otolaryngol Pol. 2016;70(4):10–15. doi: 10.5604/00306657.1199991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tala’a AA. Effects of chronic oral monosodium glutamate on body weight and liver histology in Wistar rats. Online J Vet Res. 2019;23(5):414–422. [Google Scholar]
- Tawfeeq FK, Jarjees EH (2013) The effect of monosodium glutamate to pregnant female rats and embryos. Al-Anbar J Vet Sci 6
- Tawfik MS, Al-Badr N. Adverse effects of monosodium glutamate on liver and kidney functions in adult rats and potential protective effect of vitamins C and E. Food Nutri. 2012;3:651–659. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor-Burds CC, Westburg ÄM, Wifall TC, Delay ER. Behavioral comparisons of the tastes of L-alanine and monosodium glutamate in rats. Chem Senses. 2004;29:807–814. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uchida T, Kao H, Quispe-Sjogren M, Peters RL. Alcoholic foamy degeneration—a pattern of acute alcoholic injury of the liver. Gastroenterology. 1983;84:683–692. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(83)90131-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Umukoro S, Oluwole GO, Olamijowon HE, Omogbiya AI, Eduviere AT. Effect of monosodium glutamate on behavioral phenotypes, biomarkers of oxidative stress in brain tissues and liver enzymes in mice. World J Neurosci. 2015;5:339–349. doi: 10.4236/wjns.2015.55033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wifall TC, Faes TM, Taylor-Burds CC, Mitzelfelt JD, Delay ER. An analysis of 5′-inosine and 5′-guanosine monophosphate taste in rats. Chem Senses. 2006;32:161–172. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjl043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamaguchi S, Ninomiya K. Umami and food palatability. J Nutr. 2000;130(4S):921S–926S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.4.921S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshinaga K. A historical review of blastocyst implantation research. Biol Reprod. 2018;99:175–195. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yousef M, El-Nassag D, Gasser M, Ibrahim A. Potential protective effects of propolis against hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity induced by monosodium glutamate in rabbits. Alexandria Sci Exch J. 2019;40:30–42. doi: 10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2019.26639. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zanfirescu A, Ungurianu A, Tsatsakis AM, Nițulescu GM, Kouretas D, Veskoukis A, Tsoukalas M, Engin AB, Aschner M, Margină D. A review of the alleged health hazards of monosodium glutamate. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019;18:1111–1134. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeisel SH. Dietary influences on neurotransmission. Adv Pediatr. 1986;33:23–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting findings are presented within the manuscript.