Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36276. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36276

Association of the Depth of Invasion With Recurrence Rates of Basal Cell Carcinoma in a Tertiary Health Care Facility: A Retrospective Study Over a Period of Six Years

Ambreen Unar 1, Hira Khan 2, Nida Zahid 3, Mustafa A Khan 4, Saira Fatima 5, Safdar A Shaikh 6, Mohammad Fazlur Rahman 7,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10105902  PMID: 37073206

Abstract

Background

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is one of the most common types of cutaneous malignancies and the most frequently occurring form of cancer worldwide. The incidence of basal cell carcinoma is difficult to determine due to its wide geographic variations; however, it has been increasing worldwide with an annual increase of 7% in the number of reported cases. Although BCC is more prevalent in the aging population, diagnosis in younger individuals is steadily increasing. BCC has overall low mortality, however, it leads to significant economic and physical impact on patients and their families along with adding burden to the healthcare system. The primary risk factor for the development of BCC is increased cumulative sun exposure, particularly to UV radiation. The UV index of Karachi averages around 12 (extremely high) during summer months, putting the population at a significantly higher risk of developing BCC in the long term.

Objectives

This audit was undertaken with the following primary objectives: to use the data collected to determine possible prognostic factors for BCC, to measure the rate of recurrence and the number of new primary tumors detected, to study the completeness of follow-up by patients, and to co-relate histopathological findings with the recurrence rate of basal cell carcinoma.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients with BCC who had undergone surgical resection over a six-year time period. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, tumor size, onset-to-diagnosis, anatomic location, clinical subtype, histologic differentiation, method of surgical treatment, and recurrence. Data were entered and analyzed in SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Results

The review identified cases of BCC in 99 patients. Of the 99 patients, 60.39% were men and 38.38% were women. The most frequent age group was 65-85-year-olds (42 patients, 42.85%) for BCC. Based on the aesthetic units of the face, the most common location was the nasal unit (30 cases, 30.30%) for BCC. Most of the lesions were closed primarily; however; local flaps were used in the case of surgical defects. The recurrence rate was 19.19% for BCC in this study. Our study included 1.0% of patients who were classified as Clark classification level 2 of BCC, 6.1% as Clark level 3, 23.4% as Clark level 4, and 0.16% as Clark level 5. Recurrence rates were seen to increase with increasing Clark classification level in this study.

Conclusion

In our study, many characteristics of BCC were compared to previously published reports and the results were seen to be generally similar. This study correlates the recurrence of BCC with Clark’s classification, showing that depth of invasion is a significant factor in predicting recurrence. There is a paucity of literature regarding the depth of invasion of BCC along with its’ Clarks classification and recurrence. Further studies can help explore and establish the characteristics of BCC. 

Keywords: clinical audit, tertiary care center, surgical skin excision, recurrence rate, basal cell carcinoma histopathology

Introduction

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a slow-growing epidermal malignancy arising from the basal layer of the epidermis and its appendages. Metastasis is extremely rare, but the disease can spread to regional lymph nodes, lungs, and bones [1]. BCC is the most common type of cutaneous malignancy seen around the world. Its incidence is increasing worldwide, with the literature reporting an annual increase of BCC of 7% for both genders [2]. In 2002, the incidence was 884 in 100,000, which, in 2011, increased to 1840 in 100,000 [3]. Out of all countries, Australia has the highest rate of basal cell carcinoma among its population [1]. The five-year reoccurrence rate of basal cell carcinoma after surgical intervention is 3.2% to 8% [4].

Morbidity associated with basal cell carcinoma results from local tissue invasion and destruction, particularly in the head and neck. Perivascular and perineural invasion are features associated with highly aggressive tumors. Mortality is becoming exceedingly rare, and the median age of death is higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma. Risk factors associated with basal cell carcinoma are excessive exposure to ultraviolet radiation, previous non-ionizing radiation, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, mutations in genes such as p53 and PTCH, skin types I and II, immunosuppression, and arsenic exposure [5]. Anatomically, 93% of primary basal cell carcinomas occur in the head and neck region with the nose being the most common site while the other 7% arise in the trunk. There are different morphological and histological variants of basal cell carcinoma: nodular, superficial, sclerosing, pigmented, trabecular, and adnexal, of which the most common subtype is nodular [5].

Common treatment modalities for basal cell carcinoma are surgical excision and minimally invasive destructive procedures. Radiotherapy can be considered when surgery is not feasible for locally advanced tumors. Targeted chemotherapy, such as Sonic Hedgehog pathway inhibitors, is used for metastatic or locally advanced basal cell carcinoma that cannot be treated with surgery or radiation [6,7]. Locally aggressive basal cell carcinoma of head and neck patients experience a high rate of local recurrence but low disease-specific mortality when treated with primary surgery and selected use of adjuvant treatment [8,9].

The aims of our study were to conduct an audit and determine the prognostic factors for BCCs along with their frequencies, to measure the rate of recurrence and the number of primary tumors detected, and to determine the completeness of follow-up by patients. We also aimed to discover and correlate any risk factors with the recurrence of disease in our patients.

Materials and methods

A retrospective consecutive case-series study, including all patients with biopsy-proven BCC from 2014-2019, was conducted after Ethics Review Committee (ERC) consent from our institution. We reviewed 99 patients who received treatment for BCC at the department of surgery in Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi. Patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years were included in the study. However, patients with incomplete information, patients with other cutaneous malignancies, and patients with radiation-induced basal cell carcinoma were excluded from this study. Data were collected after ethical review committee exemption. Information of all the patients who came to AKUH with basal cell carcinoma and met our eligibility criteria was recorded by the research team from their medical records on a predesigned proforma. Data were collected on documentation of pre and postoperative risk factors, treatments received, and subsequent follow-up. Patient records were reviewed for their demographic information, dimensions of the tumor, anatomical location of the tumor, clinical classification and subtype, histologic features, choice of method for surgical treatment, and tumor recurrence. Information was collected by the research team on the following: patient’s age, gender, and reason for the hospital visit, treatment modality received by the patient’s excision with or without radiation, site of the tumor, size of the tumor and width of the margins, and recurrence of the disease at the two-year follow-up. Ethical exemption was taken from the institutional ethical review board. Data were entered and analyzed in Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS ) version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics were reported as frequency and percentages for categorical variables, which were analyzed using the chi-square/Fisher exact test. Quantitative variables were reported as appropriate and are assessed by the independent t-test/Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of the 99 patients from 2014 to 2020 who received treatment for basal cell carcinoma at our institute. Out of these, 74 were excised by plastic surgeons, five were resected by ENT surgeons, and the remaining were removed by other specialties. In our study, 60.39% of patients were men and 38.38% were women. Patient ages ranged from 29 years to 89 years, with a mean ± SD age of 63.02 ± 14.99 years. The number of patients managed and treated along the lines of BCC at our institution increased each year during the study period as shown in Figures 1-2.

Figure 1. Number of patients who received treatment for basal cell carcinoma at our institute from 2014-2019.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The overall rate of incomplete excisions was 4.6%.

Figure 2

Tumor size

 The median tumor diameter was 3.92 cm with an interquartile range of 2.03-8.45 as shown in Table 1. The median anteroposterior diameter of tumors was 2.00 mm and the median transverse diameter was 2.45 mm.

Table 1. Showing tumor size, depth of invasion, and diameter of the tumor.

  Tumour Size (mm^2) Depth Transverse Dimension Vertical Dimension
N Valid 88 58 88 88
Missing 11 40 10 10
Mean 9.2289 .433 2.8284 2.2295
Median 3.9200 .300 2.4500 2.0000
Std. Deviation 16.19671 .4050 1.91058 1.72054
Percentiles 25 2.0250 .200 1.6000 1.0250
50 3.9200 .300 2.4500 2.0000
75 8.4450 .500 3.5000 2.5000

Anatomic distribution

Preoperative photographs were taken into consideration and reviewed to analyze the location of the tumors and were subsequently categorized based on different aesthetic units of the face (Table 2). The results showed a predilection for BCC for the nasal unit (30 cases, 30.30%), followed by the cheek (20 cases, 20.20%) and the forehead (15 cases, 15.15%).

Table 2. Distribution of basal cell carcinoma by aesthetic units of the head and neck region.

  Frequency Percent
  Total  99 100
Nose  Yes 30 30.30
Nasolabial fold  Yes 6 6.06
Lateral canthus of eye  Yes 13 13.13
Medial Canthus of the eye  Yes 5 5.05
Cheek  Yes 20 20.20
Periauricular region  Yes 6 6.06
Lip Yes 4 4.04
Forehead  Yes 15 15.15

Surgical treatment: operative methods

Adhering to our inclusion criteria, all the patients were treated with wide local excision of the tumors as the first choice of management. The most common method was primary closure of the lesion (68.0%), followed by a local flap (21.4%), and the rest of the cases included closure by other methods.

Recurrence

Of the 99 cases, local recurrence was noted to have occurred in 19 cases (19.19%) during the six-year study period. Patients who underwent a secondary operation were reported to have a curative rate without recurrence of 22.44%. However, there was one patient who experienced a recurrence of BCC after the secondary operation but was lost to follow-up (Table 3).

Table 3. Analysis of the relationship of the margin status with recurrence.

  Recurrence Total  
N/A Yes No  
Surgical Margins N/A Count 0 1 2 3  
% within Recurrence 0.0% 5.3% 2.7% 3.0%  
>5 mm Count 1 7 35 43  
% within Recurrence 16.7% 36.8% 47.3% 43.4%  
< 5 mm Count 5 11 37 53  
% within Recurrence 83.3% 57.9% 50.0% 53.5%  
Total Count 6 19 74 99  

Clark's classification in relation to the recurrence of BCC in patients

We evaluated the histopathological variables in a total of 46 patients, 39 of which experienced a recurrence of BCC. Fifty percent of the cases were found to have Grade IV Clark's classification and and 34.8% were in the Grade V category (Table 4). The percentage of recurrence was seen to increase in patients who had a higher Clark's classification of lesions.

Table 4. Distribution of basal cell carcinoma according to Clark's classification and the percentage of recurrences in 50% of cases.

Clark's classification Number of patients % Recurrence
2 1 0
3 6 0
4 23 8.7
5 16 25

Discussion

We conducted this study in order to audit the patients with BCC in our setting and compare outcomes and prognostic factors with those seen in the literature. Basal cell carcinoma is the most common cutaneous malignancy around the world with incidence increasing worldwide over the last decade [10]. It is more prevalent in the elderly population, which is consistent with our study [11]. A number of studies conducted in Korea have reported increases in the overall incidence of cutaneous malignancies, with the study by Kim et al. demonstrating an increase from 0.25% to 0.34% over a period of just 10 years [12]. In previous studies, the incidence of cutaneous malignancies has been shown to be greater for males than females [13], but recent studies have shown otherwise [14].

The ideal surgical treatment for BCC is complete removal, and it can be achieved with safe excision margins [15]. A 4-mm surgical margin of clinically normal skin is required for an elliptical excision, which is the most often used treatment for basal cell carcinoma. However, because of the cosmetic limitations of the face, a 4-mm surgical margin is often not compatible with the goal of holistic patient care [15].

Surgical excision is an effective treatment option for BCCs with reported recurrence rates of less than 5% [16]. Combination curettage and excision was the most often utilized treatment method for patients. A low recurrence rate of 10.5% has been observed following aggressive curettage and excision [17].

In the present study, the median tumor diameter was 0.25 cm for BCC. The face is more prone to develop skin cancer because it receives the most cumulative amount of UV radiation throughout the day. In fact, most BCC cases are found in the head and neck region [18], which is consistent with the results of our study.

Patients having a history of several BCCs are more likely to experience further skin malignancies in the future [19]. In this audit, more than one-third of individuals who had new lesions also had one or more prior BCCs. Longer follow-up was typically required for lesions that were incompletely excised, aggressive in histology, or located in high-risk locations. All of these have a poor prognosis and an increased risk of recurrence. This audit looked at patients who had their primary BCC treated by simple surgical excision and found that there was inadequate documentation of lesion size and the histological features of the tumors (only aggressive lesions were documented).

The majority of plastic surgeons acknowledge that patient follow-up has recognizable benefits, however, the desire for routine follow-up was not expressed by 62% of patients. Our clinic's high percentage of follow-up appointment cancellations leads us to believe that some of our patients would prefer not to receive regular follow-ups. Loss of compliance is caused by the costs associated with patients skipping review appointments. The cost of follow-up attendance at outpatients is difficult to estimate but by applying current figures to our audit, the cost of two years of follow-up per patient is Rs. 12000 (USD 150), while the cost of one year of follow-up is Rs. 6000 (USD 75). This proves to be substantial, especially in Pakistan where the most common means of paying for healthcare is out-of-pocket.

We reviewed the literature and found some regional and international work with similar ideas as shown in Table 5. The rate of recurrence in our retrospective review of the chart was 19.38%, which is consistent with studies conducted in Sweden, Turkey, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom [8,20-22]. According to our audit, the nodular type is the most commonly prevalent type of basal cell carcinoma in our population, which is consistent with the results of audits conducted in other studies except Elis Salimi et al. [23], who concluded that the infiltrating type is the most common in their region. The most common region involved in basal cell carcinoma is the head and neck, which is in concurrence with our findings.

Table 5. The literature review of international audits on basal cell carcinoma and comparison of results with our study .

Author and year of publication Number of patients Duration of follow-up Rate of recurrence Country Recommended resection margins Most common location ( head and neck ) Mean age of patients Most common histological subtype
Mc Loone et al. 2006 [22] 114 1999-2000 Low Risk of developing new 11-63% Belfast, United Kingdom 2 cm Yes 70 years Nodular
Venables ZC et al. 2019 [24] 285 2013-2015 No comment Wales, United Kingdom 2 cm Yes 71 years Nodular
Kyung Won Kang et al. [12] 265 19 years  3.9% Korea - Yes 70-79 years Nodular
Elias Salimi 2017 [23] 59 - 1.9% Iran 2 mm - 4 mm Yes 69.9 years Infiltrative type
Eva Van Loo [21] 469 1999-2002 13.3%-56% (5-year follow-up) The Netherlands 5 mm - 2 cm Yes No comments by the author Nodular
J. Kappelin 2020 [8] 3911 2008-2015 5% Sweden 2 cm Yes 72 years Nodular
Sibel Hakarverdi et al. 2011 [2] 197 2005-2010 17.7% Turkey 2 cm Yes 64.11 years Nodular
AKUH 2021 (current study) 98 2014-2019 19% Karachi, Pakistan 5 mm - 2 cm Yes 63 years Nodular

BCC is associated with genetic syndromes such as Bazex syndrome, basal cell nevus syndrome (also called Gorlin syndrome), and xeroderma pigmentosum [25]. Our study found three patients with co-existing conditions with BCC including melanoma, osteosclerosis, and myelofibrosis.

Many factors are associated with the recurrence of basal cell carcinoma. These include aggressive clinical and histopathologic features like morpheiform, perineural invasion, irregular border), immunosuppressive status, or prior field irradiation [12]. Lesion size is also a factor (>10 mm on a cheek, forehead, scalp, or neck, or of >6 mm on the central face, periorbital area, nose, lip, chin, or auricle). Out of 19 cases of recurrence in our study, 13 tumors were resected by plastic surgeons.

In our study, perineural involvement was not present in any tumors. However, lymphovascular invasion was present in two patients.

Strengths and limitations

The present study evaluates patients of BCC at the department of surgery from 2014 to 2019. Our registry has a near-complete coverage of performed surgeries, thus, the registry has a representative coverage of BCC tumors treated in the area during this period of time, hence decreasing the risk of selection bias. A majority of excisions were made by plastic surgeons and followed up by otorhinolaryngologists. Furthermore, this study presents detailed data regarding surgical margins in relation to histological subtypes and tumor sites. The strengths of our study include the sample size, which is that of international standards, and this is the first audit to investigate BCC at our institute. The limitations include being a single-center study design, which leads to non-generalizable results in the Pakistani population. Our study was retrospective, therefore, we encountered some missing data, which had to be excluded.

Conclusions

Basal cell carcinoma continues to be the most frequently occurring cutaneous malignancy worldwide. The data collected in this study will serve as a reference for future research and the development of preventive strategies in our population. This study also highlights the lack of proper documentation of lesion description and the loss to follow-up seen in patients treated for BCC. Follow-up proves to be vital in healthcare, as it allows physicians to re-evaluate patients following treatment and detect recurrences earlier.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank our colleagues and personnel at the department of plastic surgery and otorhinolaryngology at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan, for contributing to creating our quality registry on surgically excised basal cell carcinoma and thereby making this study possible.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.McDaniel B, Badri T, Steele RB. StatPearls [Internet. Vol. 24. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls [Internet]; 2021. Basal Cell Carcinoma; pp. 161–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Trends in the incidence of basal cell carcinoma by histopathological subtype. Arits AH, Schlangen MH, Nelemans PJ, Kelleners-Smeets NW. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:565–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03839.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.A study of basal cell carcinoma in South Asians for risk factor and clinicopathological characterization: a hospital based study. Kumar S, Mahajan BB, Kaur S, Yadav A, Singh N, Singh A. J Skin Cancer. 2014;2014:173582. doi: 10.1155/2014/173582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rerecurrence 5 years after treatment of recurrent cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. Hamilton JR, Parvataneni R, Stuart SE, Chren MM. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:616–618. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.3339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Basal cell carcinoma. Wong CS, Strange RC, Lear JT. BMJ. 2003;327:794–798. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. Von Hoff DD, LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1164–1172. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Oncologic outcomes after surgery for locally aggressive basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Gill AS, Nittur VR, Moore MG, Farwell DG, Bewley AF. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:115–119. doi: 10.1002/lary.27882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma: a case series on factors influencing the risk of an incomplete primary excision. Kappelin J, Nielsen K, Nilsson F, Bjellerup M, Ahnlide I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:2518–2525. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. Telfer NR, Colver GB, Morton CA. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:35–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Basal-cell carcinoma incidence and associated risk factors in U.S. women and men. Wu S, Han J, Li WQ, Li T, Qureshi AA. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:890–897. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Skin cancer epidemics in the elderly as an emerging issue in geriatric oncology. Garcovich S, Colloca G, Sollena P, et al. Aging Dis. 2017;8:643–661. doi: 10.14336/AD.2017.0503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.A retrospective clinical view of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region: a single institution’s experience of 247 cases over 19 years. Kang KW, Lee DL, Shin HK, Jung GY, Lee JH, Jeon MS. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2016;17:56–62. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2016.17.2.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sex and gender disparities in melanoma. Bellenghi M, Puglisi R, Pontecorvi G, De Feo A, Carè A, Mattia G. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12 doi: 10.3390/cancers12071819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sex disparity in skin carcinogenesis and potential influence of sex hormones. Collier V, Musicante M, Patel T, Liu-Smith F. Skin Health Dis. 2021;1:0. doi: 10.1002/ski2.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Surgical margin of excision in basal cell carcinoma: a systematic review of literature. Quazi SJ, Aslam N, Saleem H, Rahman J, Khan S. Cureus. 2020;12:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Treatment of facial basal cell carcinoma: a review. Smith V, Walton S. J Skin Cancer. 2011;2011:380371. doi: 10.1155/2011/380371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Treatment of basal cell carcinoma with curettage followed by imiquimod 3.75% cream. Zeichner JA, Patel RV, Birge MB. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21607193/ J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4:39–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: a retrospective analysis of completely excised 331 cases. Demirseren DD, Ceran C, Aksam B, Demirseren ME, Metin A. J Skin Cancer. 2014;2014:858636. doi: 10.1155/2014/858636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Educational case: basal cell carcinoma. O'Connell KA, Conran RM. Acad Pathol. 2021;8:2374289521998030. doi: 10.1177/2374289521998030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Retrospective analysis of basal cell carcinoma. Hakverdi S, Balci DD, Dogramaci CA, Toprak S, Yaldiz M. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77:251. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.77483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Surgical excision versus Mohs' micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma of the face: a randomised clinical trial with 10 year follow-up. van Loo E, Mosterd K, Krekels GA, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:3011–3020. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Follow-up of basal cell carcinomas: an audit of current practice. Mc Loone NM, Tolland J, Walsh M, Dolan OM. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:698–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Recurrence of basal cell carcinoma after Mohs micrographic surgery: a 4-year retrospective analysis. Salimi E, Kanjourpour A. Int J Cancer Manag. 2020;13:0. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Epidemiology of basal and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the U.K. 2013-15: a cohort study. Venables ZC, Nijsten T, Wong KF, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:474–482. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Genetic skin diseases predisposing to basal cell carcinoma. Castori M, Morrone A, Kanitakis J, Grammatico P. Eur J Dermatol. 2012;22:299–309. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2011.1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES