Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Western Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Western Journal of Medicine
. 1983 Apr;138(4):582–588.

The Effect of an Individualized Practice-Based CME Program on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes

David S Gullion, T Elaine Adamson, Malcolm S M Watts
PMCID: PMC1010773  PMID: 6868584

Abstract

The Professional Competence Assurance Program (PROCAP) is an individualized educational program that examines physicians' performance in ambulatory practice. It uses medical record review to identify deficiencies in the care process that guides development of the educational intervention. Medical care is reassessed one year later. This program was used with 51 private practitioners to assess the care of 1,229 hypertensive patients. The educational program included a computer printout comparing one physician's performance with that of peers, readings targeted to management problems, and a conference call or group seminar with an expert stressing issues relevant to each physician's performance. Postintervention assessment showed that physicians prescribed beta-blockers (P<.01) and vasodilators (P<.01) more often. Improvement (P<.05) occurred in the control of diastolic blood pressure (≤90 mm of mercury) and in several other criteria. These results show that well-designed, individualized continuing medical education addressing specific deficiencies can change physicians' performance and patients' intermediate outcome.

Full text

PDF
582

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamson T. E., Gullion D. S. Small group teaching via telephone in continuing medical education. Mobius. 1982 Oct;2(4):13–19. doi: 10.1002/chp.4760020404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertram D. A., Brooks-Bertram P. A. The evaluation of continuing medical education: a literature review. Health Educ Monogr. 1977 Winter;5(4):330–362. doi: 10.1177/109019817700500404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown C. R., Jr, Uhl H. S. Mandatory continuing education. Sense or nonsense? JAMA. 1970 Sep 7;213(10):1660–1668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christoffel T., Loewenthal M. Evaluating the quality of ambulatory health care: a review of emerging methods. Med Care. 1977 Nov;15(11):877–897. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197711000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Geertsma R. H., Parker R. C., Jr, Whitbourne S. K. How physicians view the process of change in their practice behavior. J Med Educ. 1982 Oct;57(10 Pt 1):752–761. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198210000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gonnella J. S., Goran M. J., Williamson J. W., Cotsonas N. J., Jr Evaluation of patient care. An approach. JAMA. 1970 Dec 14;214(11):2040–2043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hulka B. S., Romm F. J., Parkerson G. R., Jr, Russell I. T., Clapp N. E., Johnson F. S. Peer review in ambulatory care: use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments. Med Care. 1979 Mar;17(3 Suppl):i-vi, 1-73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lieberman C. M., Lieberman B. W. Current concepts: marihuana--a medical review. N Engl J Med. 1971 Jan 14;284(2):88–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197101142840206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lloyd J. S., Abrahamson S. Effectiveness of continuing medical education: a review of the evidence. Eval Health Prof. 1979 Sep;2(3):251–280. doi: 10.1177/016327877900200301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyons T. F., Payne B. C. The relationship of physicians' medical recording performance to their medical care performance. Med Care. 1974 Aug;12(8):714–720. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197408000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Payne B. C. The medical record as a basis for assessing physician competence. Ann Intern Med. 1979 Oct;91(4):623–629. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-4-623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Putnam W., Curry L. Patient care appraisal in the ambulatory setting: effectiveness as a continuing medical education tool. Annu Conf Res Med Educ. 1980;(19):207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Romm F. J., Putnam S. M. The validity of the medical record. Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):310–315. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanazaro P. J. Medical audit, continuing medical education and quality assurance. West J Med. 1976 Sep;125(3):241–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sibley J. C., Sackett D. L., Neufeld V., Gerrard B., Rudnick K. V., Fraser W. A randomized trial of continuing medical education. N Engl J Med. 1982 Mar 4;306(9):511–515. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198203043060904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sivertson S. E., Meyer T. C., Hansen R., Schoenenberger A. Individual Physician Profile: continuing education related to medical practice. J Med Educ. 1973 Nov;48(11):1006–1012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stein L. S. The effectiveness of continuing medical education: eight research reports. J Med Educ. 1981 Feb;56(2):103–110. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198102000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williamson J. W., Alexander M., Miller G. E. Continuing education and patient care research. Physician response to screening test results. JAMA. 1967 Sep 18;201(12):938–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Williamson J. W., Alexander M., Miller G. E. Priorities in patient-care research and continuing medical education. JAMA. 1968 Apr 22;204(4):303–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williamson J. W. Evaluating quality of patient care. A strategy relating outcome and process assessment. JAMA. 1971 Oct 25;218(4):564–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Western Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES