Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 Apr 5;19(4):e1011296. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011296

Th2-dependent STAT6-regulated genes in intestinal epithelial cells mediate larval trapping during secondary Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri infection

Stefanie Westermann 1, Christoph Schubart 1, Axel Dietschmann 2, Kirstin Castiglione 1, Daniel Radtke 1, David Voehringer 1,*
Editor: Meera Goh Nair3
PMCID: PMC10109486  PMID: 37018382

Abstract

Gastrointestinal helminths are a major health threat worldwide. Alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) have been shown to contribute to host protection during secondary helminth infections. AAMs express effector molecules that depend on activation of the IL-4- or IL-13-induced transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6). However, the specific role of STAT6-regulated genes like Arginase-1 (Arg1) from AAMs or STAT6-regulated genes in other cell types for host protection remains unclear. To address this point, we generated mice expressing STAT6 only in macrophages (Mac-STAT6 mouse). In the model of Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri (Hpb) infection, Mac-STAT6 mice could not trap larvae in the submucosa of the small intestine after secondary infection. Further, mice lacking Arg1 in hematopoietic and endothelial cells were still protected from secondary Hpb infection. On the other hand, specific deletion of IL-4/IL-13 in T cells blunted AAM polarization, activation of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and protective immunity. Deletion of IL-4Rα on IEC also caused loss of larval trapping while AAM polarization remained intact. These results show that Th2-dependent and STAT6-regulated genes in IECs are required and AAMs are not sufficient for protection against secondary Hpb infection by mechanisms that remain to be investigated.

Author summary

Infection of mice with the gastrointestinal helminth Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri is widely used as a model of hookworm infection to study protective immunity. During secondary infection Hpb larvae are trapped in granulomas located in the submucosa of the small intestine by mechanisms that remain poorly defined. Alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) and expression of STAT6-regulated genes, especially Arginase 1, were reported to play an important role in larval trapping. However, using various genetically modified mouse strains we show that AAMs are not sufficient and Arginase 1 is dispensable for larval trapping whereas T cell-derived IL-4/IL-13 and activation of STAT6-regulated genes in intestinal epithelial cells play a critical role in this process.

Introduction

Infections with gastrointestinal helminths affect approximately 2 billion people worldwide and infected individuals, particularly children, often suffer from malnutrition accompanied by physical and cognitive deficits [1]. Efficient anthelminthic drugs for treatment are available, but rapid reinfection and increasing drug resistances underline the need for long-term preventive measures [1,2]. Unfortunately, the immune response against helminths is not yet fully elucidated but a complete understanding is required for development of effective new therapeutics and vaccines.

Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri (Hpb) is a rodent gut dwelling helminth that can be used to model human hookworm infection such as with Ancylostoma ceylanicum [3,4]. Infective L3 stage larvae are ingested and reach the small intestine within 24 to 48 hours, where they invade the submucosa until the outer muscularis layer to molt into L4 [3]. After 6 to 8 days post infection, L4 molt again to become adult worms and re-enter the intestinal lumen to mate whereupon females lay eggs that are released with the feces [3]. Notably, a primary infection with Hpb establishes chronicity in wild-type (WT) mice whereas after a secondary infection the larvae are trapped in a granulomatous structure in the submucosa, formed by a memory response of the host’s immune system, largely preventing their re-entry as adults into the intestinal lumen [5].

Protective immunity against helminths is mediated by a type 2 immune response and involves an interplay of adaptive and innate immune cells. Interleukin (IL) IL-4 and IL-13 secretion from Th2 cells promotes STAT6-dependent polarization of alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs), which were shown to mediate protection against secondary infections with Hpb or Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) [6–8]. In addition, IL-4/IL-13 expressing innate immune cells, including eosinophils, basophils, mast cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s), have also been reported to contribute to protection against gastrointestinal helminths by activation of tuft cells, goblet cells and smooth muscle cells in the small intestine [9–12].

AAMs are usually associated with wound repair, fibrosis and anti-helminth immune responses [5,13]. AAMs express several STAT6-induced effector molecules like Arginase 1 (Arg1), Resistin-like molecule alpha (Relm-α, Retnla), programmed cell death ligand 2 (PD-L2, Pdcd1lg2) and chitinase-like protein Ym-1 (Chil3) that have been suggested to contribute to host defense against helminths [7,8,14–16]. Arg1 has been shown to mediate worm expulsion through impairment of larval health and motility in a secondary Hpb infection [7]. On the other hand, S. mansoni infection in Arg1-deleted mice lead to enhanced type 2 immunity-mediated inflammation and increased death rate [17]. Relm-α was reported to have negative regulatory functions on type 2 immunity-mediated inflammation [18–20]. This effect could be linked to Relm-α expression in hematopoietic cells [21]. Furthermore, Ym-1 was shown to induce Relm-α expression in the lung and both molecules contribute to tissue repair [16]. PD-L2 expression by AAMs was shown to inhibit T cell proliferation and was suggested to prevent an overwhelming type 2 response [14]. Considering these diverse reports, the specific contribution of AAMs and their STAT6-regulated genes, particularly Arg1, to host protection in secondary helminth infections is not clear.

In this study, we generated Mac-STAT6 mice in which STAT6 can only be activated in macrophages (and some other LysM-expressing cells) to investigate the role of AAMs and their STAT6-regulated genes during secondary Hpb infection. STAT6 expression in macrophages was not sufficient and Arg1 expression was dispensable for larval trapping after secondary Hpb infection. In contrast, mice with constitutively active STAT6 in IECs were able to trap Hpb larvae, even in the absence of CD4+ T cells. Importantly, selective deletion of IL-4/IL-13 in T cells or deletion of IL-4Rα on IEC both resulted in impaired larval trapping while AAM differentiation remained intact in the latter situation. These findings indicate that AAMs are not sufficient and Arg1 expression is dispensable for larval trapping while T cell-derived IL-4/IL-13 and activation of STAT6-regulated genes in IECs play a critical role.

Results

Generation of mice with STAT6 expression restricted to macrophages

To investigate the role of STAT6-regulated genes in macrophages for mediating immunity against helminths, we generated mice where STAT6 is expressed only in macrophages. We have previously shown that crossing CD19Cre or VillinCre mice to Rosa26LSL-STAT6vt mice leads to expression of a constitutively active form of STAT6 (STAT6vt) in B cells or intestinal epithelial cells (IEC), respectively [22–25]. Here, we crossed these Rosa26LSL-STAT6vt mice to LysMCre mice and subsequently to mice with a complete knockout of STAT6 (STAT6ko) in order to obtain mice where all cells are STAT6ko except those that express the LysM gene, i.e. predominantly macrophages and neutrophils (Mac-STAT6 mice). To test the phosphorylation of STAT6, we generated bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) and isolated B cells from the spleen of Mac-STAT6, STAT6ko and WT mice and applied them to Western blot analysis. Contrary to expectations and for reasons that remain unclear, STAT6 in the BMDMs of Mac-STAT6 mice was not constitutively phosphorylated as can be seen in the Western blot of unstimulated cells (Fig 1A, left blot). However, when BMDM from the Mac-STAT6 mouse were stimulated with IL-4, STAT6 was phosphorylated comparably to STAT6 in BMDM from WT mice, meaning that STAT6 in the Mac-STAT6 mouse can be activated normally (Fig 1A, right blot). B cells isolated from the Mac-STAT6 mouse and stimulated with IL-4 did only show a very faint band, indicating a good specificity of STAT6 expression only in LysM-expressing cells. As expected, neither phosphorylated nor total STAT6 was detectable in BMDMs and B cells of STAT6ko mice. Furthermore, the expression of the STAT6-regulated genes Arg1, Retnla and Pdcd1lg2 in BMDMs from Mac-STAT6 mice after IL-4 stimulation was comparable to that in WT mice and prominently enhanced compared to that in BMDMs from STAT6ko mice (Fig 1B).

Fig 1. Functional expression of STAT6 in macrophages of the Mac-STAT6 mouse.

Fig 1

Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM, purity >95%) were generated and splenic B cells (purity > 90%) isolated from mice that do express STAT6 only under control of the LysMCre promoter (Mac-STAT6), STAT6 knockout mice (STAT6ko) and BALB/c wild-type (WT) controls. A) Western blot of unstimulated (w/o) and IL-4-stimulated BMDM and B cell lysates of the indicated genotypes for phosphorylated STAT6 (pSTAT6), total STAT6 and β-actin as loading control. Western blot is representative for three to five mice per genotype from two independent experiments. B) qRT-PCR of BMDM from either Mac-STAT6, STAT6ko or WT mice stimulated with 20 ng/ml IL-4 for 48 hrs. Bars show mean expression + SEM of Arg1, Retnla and Pdcd1lg2 normalized on Hprt of three to four mice per genotype out of two experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Two-Way-ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post-hoc testingon log-transformed data. ***p < 0.001; *p < 0.05.

In summary, the Mac-STAT6 mouse provides a tool to investigate the role of STAT6-regulated genes in macrophages without the contribution of STAT6-regulated genes in other cell types.

AAMs are not sufficient for larval trapping during a secondary Hpb infection

In a secondary Hpb infection, polarization of AAMs requires memory Th2 cells [7,26]. To ensure sufficient induction of AAMs in the Mac-STAT6 mice, we decided to reinforce AAM polarization by administration of IL-4 complexes (IL-4c) as described elsewhere [27]. We performed a secondary Hpb infection with i.p. injection of IL-4c or PBS control every other day from the day of secondary helminth infection onwards (Fig 2A). IL-4c-treated Mac-STAT6 mice were not able to trap larvae during secondary infection (Fig 2B). In histological staining of granuloma regions, Relm-α was abundantly expressed in IL-4c-treated Mac-STAT6 mice, more prominent than in the PBS or STAT6ko controls and co-staining with CD68 and DAPI confirmed Relm-α expression in AAMs with similar frequency in Mac-STAT6 and WT mice (Fig 2C). In contrast, compared to WT mice fewer macrophages expressed Arg1 in Mac-STAT6 and STAT6ko mice in all different conditions (Fig 2D). Flow cytometry analysis of cells from the peritoneal cavity (PEC) was used to determine the efficiency of AAM polarization of PEC macrophages, defined by increased PD-L2 surface expression (S1A and S1B Fig). PD-L2 was upregulated significantly in IL-4c-treated Mac-STAT6 mice compared to STAT6ko mice and upregulation was comparable to the level in WT mice (S1C Fig). In addition, RT-PCR of sorted PEC macrophages from IL-4c-treated Mac-STAT6 mice revealed their expression of other AAM-associated markers (S1D Fig). We further analysed mice on day 2 after secondary Nb infection. Compared to STAT6ko mice, both Mac-STAT6 and WT mice showed a trend to fewer larvae in the lung and expressed similar levels of AAM markers (S2 Fig). This indicates that AAM polarization can be induced in macrophages of Mac-STAT6 mice in another helminth infection model. It has been described before that Hpb-specific antibodies of the IgG2a/c isotype can induce Arg1 expression in macrophages and inhibit the motility of larvae [28]. Therefore, we determined the humoral immune response in Mac-STAT6 and control mice. Due to the deficiency of STAT6 in B cells of Mac-STAT6 mice, we observed lower serum levels of total and antigen-specific IgG1 and IgE but higher levels of IgG2a and IgG2b (S3 and S4 Figs). This shows that humoral immunity is not impaired but altered in Mac-STAT6 and STAT6ko mice which actually produce more of the reported macrophage activating isotype. However, we cannot exclude that the quality of the antibodies (affinity, glycosylation pattern) is different compared to WT mice.

Fig 2. AAMs are not sufficient for larval trapping during a secondary Hpb infection.

Fig 2

A) Schematic timeline: Mac-STAT6 mice, STAT6ko mice or BALB/c (WT) control mice were primary infected with Hpb, infection was cleared by Pyrantel pamoate after two weeks and four to six weeks later, mice were secondarily infected. 5 μg/mouse IL-4c in 100 μl PBS or PBS for control groups was injected i.p. on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 after secondary infection. B) Mean + SEM of granuloma with or without (w/o) larvae on day 9 after secondary infection. Statistical analysis was performed separately for granuloma with or w/o larvae by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-hoc testing. *p<0.05. Data are pooled from three independent experiments with five to seven mice per group. C and D) Histological stainings and quantifications of small intestinal cross-sections day 9 after secondary Hpb infection for detection of Relm-α (red) and CD68 (green) (C), or DAPI (blue) and Arg1 (green) (D). Quantification plots display Mean + SEM of percentage of Relm-α+ or Arg1+ of DAPI+CD68+ macrophages, respectively. Representative picture and quantification for four to seven mice per genotype. Scale bar is 100 μm.

Together, these data suggest that AAMs are not sufficient for larval trapping in a secondary Hpb infection. However, the lower expression level of Arg1 in Mac-STAT6 mice may indicate that Arg1 plays an important role.

Arg1 is dispensable for larval trapping

Arg1 was reported to be essential for larval trapping, as mice that were given the Arginase inhibitor BEC were not able to trap the larvae in a secondary Hpb infection [7]. However, a systemically applied inhibitor can have many undesired side effects, so we decided to verify that previous observation with a genetic deletion mouse model. The Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl mice have a genetic knockout of Arg1 in all hematopoietic and endothelial cells and were described before [29]. BMDMs of Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl mice did confirm the knockout by the absence of Arg1 induction upon IL-4 stimulation (Fig 3A). Other IL-4-inducible genes such as Retnla, Chil3, Pdcd1lg2, Mrc1 and Mmp12 were regulated similarly in the IL-4 stimulated BMDM of Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl and Arg1fl/fl control mice. To investigate the role of Arg1 in vivo, we performed a secondary Hpb infection. Unexpectedly, the Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl mice were able to trap larvae as efficient as their Arg1fl/fl littermate controls (Fig 3B). Histological staining for Arg1 and DAPI did show the trapped larvae in the submucosa although Arg1 is absent in the Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl mouse (Fig 3C, right panel). Besides, AAMs, defined here by Relm-α and CD68 co-expression, were present in the granuloma in a similar amount in mice of both genotypes (Fig 3C, upper panel).

Fig 3. Arg1 is dispensable for larval trapping.

Fig 3

A) qRT-PCR of BMDM from mice that lack Arg1 (Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl) or control mice (Arg1fl/fl) stimulated with 20 ng/mL IL-4 or 100 ng/mL LPS for 48 hrs. Bars show mean for two mice per genotype and condition from one experiment. B) Granuloma count on day 9 after secondary Hpb infection in the small intestinal submucosa of Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl and Arg1fl/fl mice. Mean + SEM number of granuloma with larvae and granuloma without (w/o) larvae of five to ten mice per group pooled from two independent experiments. C) Immunofluorescence staining from small intestinal tissue day 9 after secondary Hpb infection. The upper panel shows staining for Relm-α (red) and CD68 (green) and the lower panel staining for Arg1 (green) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar is 100 μm. Pictures are representative for ten to eleven mice per genotype from two independent experiments. Quantifications display Mean + SEM of percentage of Relm-α+ or Arg1+ of DAPI+CD68+ cells, respectively. D) Quantification of total macrophages (DAPI+CD68+) in granuloma. Statistical significance between the different genotypes was determined by Student’s t-Test, ***p < 0.001; ns not significant.

Taken together, genetic deletion of Arg1 in hematopoietic and endothelial cells did not result in impaired larval trapping.

Activated STAT6 in intestinal epithelial cells is sufficient for larval trapping in the absence of CD4+ T cells

Since STAT6-regulated genes in AAMs appeared insufficient for larval trapping in a secondary Hpb infection, we investigated the role of STAT6 in other cell types. A previous report from our group introduced the VillinCre_STAT6vt mice, which express a constitutively active form of STAT6 in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) which causes accumulation of secretory IECs [22]. Remarkably, these mice show a protective immune response against Hpb already during primary infection [22]. One may hypothesize that activated IEC cause larval trapping by promoting a local Th2 response. Considering that memory CD4+ T cells were reported to be essential for larval trapping in secondary Hpb infection [7], we asked whether VillinCre_STAT6vt would still be protected from secondary infection if CD4+ T cells are absent. Thus, we performed a secondary Hpb infection and depleted CD4+ T cells by i.v. injection of an anti-CD4 antibody on the same day as helminth infection (day 0) and again on day 4 after infection (Fig 4A). Depletion of CD4+ T cells occured with high efficiency while macrophages and B cells remained largely unaffected (S5 Fig). Strikingly, the VillinCre_STAT6vt mice were still able to trap larvae, significantly better than their STAT6vt littermate controls, despite the absence of CD4+ T cells (Fig 4B). Accordingly, CD4+ T cell-depleted VillinCre_STAT6vt mice had significantly lower fecal egg counts than CD4+ T cell-depleted STAT6vt mice on day 14 after secondary infection (Fig 4C). Interestingly, gene expression of Arg1, Retnla and Chil3 were strongly reduced in CD4+ T cell-depleted compared to isotype-treated VillinCre_STAT6vt mice, indicating that the typical AAM-associated gene expression was diminished (Fig 4D). Also, histological stainings for Relm-α and Arg1 confirmed the very low expression of AAM effector proteins in the absence of CD4+ T cells (Fig 4E). In contrast, the expression of Retnlb, a STAT6-regulated gene expressed in goblet cells (a subset of IECs), was only reduced in CD4+ T cell-depleted STAT6vt control but not VillinCre_STAT6vt or isotype control-treated mice (Fig 4D).

Fig 4. Activated STAT6 in intestinal epithelial cells is sufficient for larval trapping in the absence of CD4+ T cells.

Fig 4

A) Schematic timeline for the CD4 depletion experiment performed with mice with constitutively active STAT6 in IECs (VillinCre_STAT6vt) and Cre- littermate controls (STAT6vt): Primary Hpb infection was cleared by oral gavage with twice 1 mg Pyrantel pamoate per mouse. 4–6 weeks later, mice were secondarily infected with Hpb and anti-CD4 or isotype antibody (AB) was injected i.v. on day 0 and 4 of secondary infection. B) Number of counted granuloma with or without (w/o) larvae in the submucosa on day 9 or 10 after secondary Hpb infection. Bars show mean count + SEM of four to eleven mice per group from two independent experiments. C) Eggs per gram feces counted on day 14 after secondary Hpb infection. Data show mean count + SEM of three to seven mice per group from two independent experiments. D) Relative expression of Arg1, Retnla, Retnlb, Chil3, Pdcd1lg2, and Mrc1, calculated by normalisation to Hprt. Bars show mean + SEM of four to eleven mice per group from two independent experiments. E) Histological staining and quantification of Relm-α (red) and CD68 (green) in tissue sections from small intestine day 9 after secondary Hpb infection in the left panel and for DAPI (blue) and Arg1 (green) in the right panel. Mean + SEM of percentage of Relm-α+ or Arg1+ of DAPI+CD68+ cells, respectively. Representative picture for one mouse per genotype and quantification for all five to ten mice per group from two independent experiments. Scale bar corresponds to 100 μm. B-E) Statistical significance was determined by Two-Way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post-hoc testing. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.

In summary, we confirm here that CD4+ T cells are essential for larval trapping and activation of IECs in secondary Hpb infection. However, the need for CD4+ T cells could be overcome by expression of a constitutively active form of STAT6 in IECs, emphasizing the prominent role of STAT6-regulated genes in IECs in contributing to larval trapping.

STAT6 signaling in IECs is required for efficient larval trapping

Since our data from the VillinCre_STAT6vt mice suggested that STAT6 signaling in IECs is important for larval trapping during secondary Hpb infection, we asked next whether larval trapping would be impaired when STAT6 signaling in IECs is interrupted. Therefore, we generated mice in which the IL-4Rα is selectively deleted in IECs (VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl). Strikingly, the VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl mice trapped the larvae significantly less efficient than their Cre- littermate controls upon secondary infection (Fig 5A). Histology sections of granuloma regions in the small intestine revealed that Relm-α- and Arg1-expressing macrophages were well present around the granuloma with similar numbers in VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl and IL-4Rαfl/fl control mice (Fig 5B). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the compartments of eosinophils, macrophages, B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell in the PEC and mLN of VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl compared to controls (S6 Fig). However, activation of IECs was abrogated in VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl mice as indicated by a complete loss of Relm-β+ IECs (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. STAT6 signaling in IECs is required for efficient larval trapping.

Fig 5

Mice with a specific deletion of the IL-4Rα in intestinal epithelial cells (VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl) and their Cre- littermate controls (IL-4Rαfl/fl) were subjected to a secondary Hpb infection. A) Number of granuloma in the submucosa with or without (w/o) larvae counted on day 9 after secondary Hpb infection. B) Representative pictures and quantification of Relm-α (upper panel), Arg1 (middle panel) and Relm-β (lower panel) in histological small intestinal sections on day 9 after secondary Hpb infection. Quantification was calculated in Fiji (Relm-α and Arg1) or manually by counting Relm-β+ IECs per field of view (FOV). Scale bar corresponds to 100 μm (Relm-α and Arg1) or 200 μm (Relm-β). A-B) Mean + SEM of five to six mice per group from two independent experiments are displayed. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-Test. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; ns not significant.

In conclusion, STAT6-regulated genes in IECs are required for efficient larval trapping but dispensable for AAM polarization in granuloma.

IL-4/IL-13 from CD4+ T cells is required for activation of IECs, AAM polarization and larval trapping

IL-4 and IL-13 are the two major cytokines for protective immunity against gastrointestinal helminths. To investigate whether T cell-derived IL-4/IL-13 is required for IEC activation in vivo, we performed a secondary Hpb infection with mice that have a T cell-specific knockout of IL-4/IL-13 (4-13Tko), complete IL-4/IL-13 knockout (4-13ko) and WT control mice. Neither 4-13Tko nor 4-13ko mice were able to trap larvae in the submucosa (Fig 6A). Gene expression analysis of whole small intestinal tissue showed that expression of Retnlb was not induced in both knockout mice while it was highly expressed in WT mice (Fig 6B), indicating that IECs are not activated in the knockout mice. Similarly, the AAM-associated markers Arg1, Retnla, Chil3, Pdcd1lg2 and Mrc1 and the Relm-α-induced enzyme Lysyl-hydroxylase 2 (Lh2) in fibroblasts involved in formation of collagen bundles were only expressed in WT but not in 4-13Tko or 4-13ko mice (Fig 6B). However, expression of phospholipase A2 group 1b (Pla2g1b) in IECs, which was previously shown to contribute to larval killing during secondary Hpb infection [30], was comparable in all three groups of mice. Histological staining for Relm-α (Fig 6C, upper panel) and Arg1 (Fig 6C, lower panel) confirmed the gene expression data also on protein level. We further observed impaired differentiation of goblet cells (Relm-β+) and tuft cells (DCLK1+) while Paneth cells (Lysozyme+) were not affected and the number of IECs in cell cycle (Ki67+) were even increased (S7 Fig).

Fig 6. IL-4/IL-13 from CD4+ T cells is required for activation of IECs, AAM polarization and larval trapping.

Fig 6

T cell-specific IL-4/IL-13 knockout (4-13Tko), complete IL-4/IL-13 knockout (4-13ko) or B6 wild-type control (WT) mice were infected twice with Hpb and analysed on day 9 after secondary infection. A) Number of counted granuloma with or without (w/o) larvae. B) qRT-PCR data from whole small intestinal tissue for Arg1, Retnla, Retnlb, Pla2g1b, Chil3, Pdcd1lg2, Mrc1, and Lh2. C) Immunofluorescence staining in small intestinal sections day 9 after secondary Hpb infection. Upper panel was stained for Relm-α (red) and CD68 (green) and lower panel for DAPI (blue) and Arginase 1 (green), scale bar is 100μm. Bars display quantification of percentage of Relm-α+ or Arg1+ cells of DAPI+CD68+. Representative pictures and quantification for four to six mice per genotype from two independent experiments. A-C) Bars show mean + SEM of data pooled from two independent experiments with four to six mice per group. Statistical significance was determined by One-Way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post-hoc testing or, if normality or equal variance were not given, by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-hoc testing. ***p < 0.001; *p < 0.05.

Taken together, IL-4/IL-13 from CD4+ T cells are required for activation of IECs, differentiation of AAMs and essential for larval trapping in a secondary Hpb infection.

Discussion

AAM polarization and expression of several effector molecules is dependent on macrophage-intrinsic activation of STAT6. We generated a mouse model where STAT6-regulated genes could only be activated in macrophages and observed that AAMs and their STAT6-regulated genes were dispensable for larval trapping during secondary Hpb infection. Instead, T cell-derived IL-4/IL-13 and activation of STAT6 in IECs were critical components for larval trapping.

AAMs are induced by IL-4-secreting memory Th2 cells in the context of helminth infections and were described to mediate protection not only during secondary Hpb infection but also during secondary infection with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) [7,8,31,32]. It has been reported that during secondary Hpb infection of WT mice, larvae are trapped in the small intestinal submucosa through memory Th2 cell-polarized AAMs and their expression of Arg1 [7]. In this study polarization of AAMs required cell-intrinsic expression of STAT6, as CD4+ T cell transfer from primary Hpb infected WT mice into STAT6ko mice did not sufficiently induce AAMs and mice retained higher parasite and egg burden than WT recipients [7]. Administration of IL-4c has been shown to induce Relm-α expression in lung interstitial and PEC macrophages [27]. We administered IL-4c during secondary Hpb infection to successfully induce AAM polarization, as shown by flow cytometry, RT-PCR and histology. However, we did not observe that these AAMs were sufficient to trap the larvae. A previous study has shown that IL-4c administration to WT mice during the first few days of a primary Hpb infection is also not sufficient for larval trapping [33]. The reported requirement of Arg1 expression from AAMs in protection during secondary Hpb infection was concluded from experiments using an arginase inhibitor [7]. Systemic administration of such chemical inhibitors can have side effects that influence the outcome of the infection. This issue can be avoided by genetically deleting Arg1. In that case, we found no evidence for a protective role of Arg1 in secondary Hpb infection.

Although our mouse model with selective STAT6 expression in macrophages showed that this is not sufficient to trap larvae, it implicates that STAT6 expression in other cell types must be important. Others have already shown that IL-4 receptor expression on non-bone marrow-derived cells is required for worm expulsion from the intestine [34]. Further, hypercontractility of smooth muscle cells evoked by IL-4 and IL-13 was shown to be dependent on STAT6 in helminth infection [35]. Previous data from our group did show that selective expression of constitutively active STAT6 in IECs is protective against Nb and Hpb infections and leads to trapping of the larvae already in primary Hpb infection [22]. As expected, we also observed trapping of larvae in these mice during secondary Hpb infection, similar to WT mice. Remarkably, when CD4+ T cells were depleted during secondary Hpb infection, mice with the constitutively active STAT6 in IECs were still protected, whereas WT mice were not. These data confirm the critical role of CD4+ T cells for larval trapping after secondary infection as shown before [7,26]. Notably, expression of AAM-associated markers like Arg1, Relm-α or Ym-1 was not induced in the CD4+ T cell-depleted VillinCre_STAT6vt mice, suggesting that STAT6-regulated genes in IECs are sufficient to protect mice in the absence of Th2 cells and AAMs. In turn, these data also show that STAT6-regulated genes in other cells are redundant if STAT6 in IECs is activated. Importantly, VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl mice could not trap larvae during secondary infection despite presence of AAMs in granuloma. Others have already shown the importance of IL-4 receptor signaling in IECs as VillinCre-IL4Rαflox/- mice exhibited impaired worm expulsion in primary Nb infection [36]. Further, a recent study has reported that STAT6 phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation leads to upregulation of the STAT6-regulated gene Gasdermin C in IECs after primary Hpb infection, which facilitated IL-33 secretion via membrane pores and thereby contributed to effective anti-helminth response and intestinal inflammation [37]. Whether this mechanism is also important during a secondary Hpb infection remains to be examined. Relm-β is an effector molecule secreted by goblet cells and has been reported to protect mice from Hpb infection through inhibiting fecundity and survival of adult worms [36,38]. We observed high Retnlb expression in the VillinCre_STAT6vt mice, even after depletion of CD4+ T cells. However, it is rather unlikely that Relm-β contributes to larval trapping because it is secreted to the intestinal lumen while L4 stage larvae are trapped in granuloma structures in the submucosal layer. In our study, Relm-β rather serves as a marker for IL-4/IL-13-induced activation of IECs and goblet cell hyperplasia. Goblet cells and tuft cells were strongly reduced in 4-13Tko mice after secondary Hpb infection demonstrating the requirement of Th2 cells for IEC activation in this model. This is in contrast to the Nb infection model where ILC2- rather than T cell-derived IL-4/IL-13 is required for IEC activation and worm expulsion [39].

In conclusion, we demonstrate the importance of an AAM-independent Th2-IEC-axis for protection against secondary Hpb infection and the relevant IEC-derived molecules that orchestrate larval trapping remain to be identified.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Mouse experiments were conducted with permission of authorities from the Government of Lower Franconia, Germany.

Mice

Generation of STAT6vt mice was described before [22]. These mice were then mated with LysMCre mice to have the STAT6vt expressed under the control of the promotor of lysozyme M [40]. LysMCre-STAT6vt mice were then crossed to mice with a complete knockout of STAT6 (4get STAT6ko) [41] to receive a mouse line where STAT6vt can only be expressed in LysM expressing cells (mainly macrophages and neutrophils) and with a STAT6ko phenotype for all LysM non-expressing cell types, termed Mac-STAT6 mouse. Mac-STAT6 and STAT6ko mice were on a BALB/c background and BALB/c WT mice (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were used as controls. Mice with a knockout of Arg1 in hematopoietic and endothelial cells, Tie2Cre-Arg1fl/fl mice, were described before and on BALB/c background [29]. VillinCre_STAT6vt mice on C57BL/6 background, which express a constitutively active form of STAT6 in intestinal epithelial cells, were described before [22]. VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl mice on C57BL/6 background were generated by crossing Cre-negative littermates from the VillinCre_STAT6vt line to IL-4Rαfl/fl mice [42]. Mice with a T cell-specific knockout of IL-4/IL-13 (CD4Cre_IL-4/IL-13fl/fl, named here 4-13Tko) [43] and mice with a complete knockout of IL-4/IL-13 (4-13ko) [44] were described before. Both lines were on B6 background and C57BL/6J or Ly5.1 B6 mice (Charles River) were used as control. All mice were kept under specific pathogen free conditions.

Hpb infection

Mice were given 200 L3 stage larvae by oral gavage. For a secondary Hpb infection, chronic primary infection was cleared by administration of 1 mg pyrantel pamoate (Sigma-Aldrich) per mouse on day 14 and 16 after primary infection. After 4–6 weeks, mice were challenged with 200 L3 stage larvae given by oral gavage. To assess parasite egg burden, fecal pellets were collected and soaked in 1 mL water overnight. After addition of 3 mL saturated sodium chloride (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), eggs were counted in a McMaster counting chamber (FiBL, Frick, Switzerland) and normalized to gram of feces. Hpb excretory/secretory antigen (HES) was prepared from adult worms isolated from the small intestine of infected mice. Isolated worms were washed extensively with PBS/1% Pen-Strep (v/v) and 1000 worms/mL were incubated in RPMI/1% Pen-Strep (v/v) at 37°C and 5% CO2 for five days. After incubation, supernatant was taken, sterile filtered and stored at -80°C.

Nb infection

Mice were infected with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) by subcutaneous injection of 500 L3 stage larvae at the base of the tail and treated with antibiotics (2 g/L neomycin sulfate, 100 mg/L polymyxin B) in the drinking water for the first 5 days after infection. Secondary infection was performed more than 28 days after primary infection and mice were sacrificed on day 2 after secondary infection. The number of larvae that reached the lung was determined by allowing the larvae to migrate out of the tissue and subsequent counting of the larvae.

IL-4 complex injection

Preparation and usage of IL-4 complex (IL-4c: anti-IL-4 antibody to IL-4) was performed as described before [27,45]. Briefly, recombinant mouse IL-4 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) was complexed to anti-IL-4 mAB (11B11, BioXcell, West Lebanon, NH) at a 1:5 ratio of molecular weight and 5 μg IL-4 complexed to anti-IL-4 in 100 μL PBS or PBS only as control were injected i.p. on day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after secondary Hpb infection.

CD4+ T cell depletion

On day 0 and day 4 of secondary Hpb infection, 250 μg of anti-CD4 (GK1.5, BioXcell) or isotype control (Rat IgG2b, LTF-2; BioXcell) were injected i.v. into the tail vein of the mice. Depletion of CD4+ T cells was verified on day 8 by flow cytometry of blood samples.

Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM)

For BMDM generation, femurs and tibiae from mice were flushed out and cells were subjected to hypotonic red blood cell lysis. 3x106 cells were seeded on a 10 cm petri dish and cultured in DMEM (10% FCS, 1% L-Glutamine, 1% Pen-Strep, all (v/v)) containing 15% (v/v) L929 supernatant with medium changed on day 3 and 5. Differentiated macrophages were harvested on culture day 7 and 1x106 cells per mL were seeded in a 24-well plate and stimulated with 20 ng/mL IL-4 or 100 ng/mL LPS or left unstimulated. For Western blot, stimulation was performed for 1 hr, whereas for qRT-PCR stimulation was performed for 48 hrs, as indicated in the figure legends. Purity of BMDM cultures was determined by flow cytometry and only cultures with >95% CD11b+ F4/80+ cells were used for further experiments.

B cell isolation

Spleens from at least two mice per genotype were pooled and meshed through a 70 μm cell strainer. Single cell suspension was resuspended in Mojo Sort Buffer (2.5% BSA (w/v), 10 mM EDTA, PBS) and B cells were isolated using magnetic bead isolation with the MojoSort Pan B cell Isolation Kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) and an EasySep Magnet (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 10x106 B cells per condition were stimulated in DMEM (10% FCS, 1% L-Glutamine, 1% Pen-Strep, all (v/v)) with 20 ng/ml IL-4 for 1 hr for Western blot analysis. Purity of B cell isolation was determined by flow cytometry and was >90%.

Sort of PEC macrophages

Mac-STAT6, STAT6ko and WT mice were treated with IL-4c i.p. on day 0 and day 2 and sacrificed on day 4, as described before [27]. PEC cells were harvested in PBS and stained with F4/80-PE-Cy7 (BM8) and CD11b-FITC (M1/70) as described in the flow cytometry section. Macrophages were sorted as F4/80+CD11b+ on a S3 sorter (Bio-RAD, Hercules, CA). Cells were sorted into RPMI/40% FCS (v/v), pelleted, lysed in RLT/10% DTT (v/v) and stored at –80°C until RNA preparation for qRT-PCR analysis. Purity was determined after sort and only samples containing >90% F4/80+CD11b+ cells were used for gene expression analysis.

ELISA

For detection of antibodies in serum, plates were coated with rat-anti-mouse IgE (R35-72; BD) or goat-anti-mouse IgG (Southern Biotech) overnight at 4°C. Purified mouse IgE (BD) or unlabelled mouse IgG1, IgG2a or IgG2b (all Southern Biotech) were used to generate a standard curve. Goat-anti-mouse IgE-AP, IgG1-AP, IgG2a-AP or IgG2b-AP (all Southern Biotech) were used for detection. For detection of parasite-specific antibodies, plates were coated with 20 μg/mL of HES suspension overnight at 4°C. After blocking for 2 hrs with 3% BSA, samples were incubated at room temperature for 2 hrs and the AP-coupled antibodies named above were used for detection. Absorption was measured on a Multiscan FC photometer (Thermo Fisher) at 405 nm and blank wells were used to subtract background.

Western blot

Cells were washed with PBS and then lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (1% (v/v) NP-40, 50 mM Tris (pH7.4), 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.25% deoxycholic acid) containing PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor and cOmplete proteinase inhibitor (both Roche, Basel, Switzerland). 20 μg of protein were run on a SDS-PAGE and semi-dry blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane with the Trans-Blot Turbo System (all Bio-RAD, Hercules, CA). Membranes were blocked with 3% BSA in TRIS-buffered saline-tween buffer (TBS-T) and phospho-STAT6 (Y641), STAT6 (Rabbit Ab) or beta-actin (13E5) were applied as primary antibodies (all Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) at 4°C overnight. Bound primary antibodies were detected by a HRP-linked polyclonal goat-anti-rabbit antibody (Rockland Immunochemicals, Limerick, PA) and the SignalFire Plus ECL reagent (Cell Signaling Technology) using the ChemiDoc imager (Bio-RAD). Membranes were stripped with the Restore PLUS Western Blot Stripping Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) before a further primary antibody was applied.

qRT-PCR

For qRT-PCR from stimulated cell cultures, BMDMs were lysed in RLT buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with 0.1 M DTT and frozen at -80°C overnight. RNA was isolated with the Quiagen RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) and cDNA was synthesized with the Superscript III reverse Transcriptase Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), both according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For qRT-PCR from whole lung and whole small intestinal tissue, samples were collected in TRIsure (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany), shredded using 3 mm Tungsten Carbide Beads (Qiagen) in a Bead Ruptor (Omni International, Kennesaw, GA) with 3 cycles at 3.1 m/s for 15 sec and frozen at -80°C overnight. RNA isolation was performed using the Chloroform/Isopropanol method and cDNA was synthesized with the Applied Biosystems High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The SYBR Select Master Mix (Thermo) was used to perform qRT-PCR and these were measured either on a CFX-Connect instrument (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) or a Applied Biosystems ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Hprt was used as a housekeeping gene. Primer sequences can be found in S1 Table.

Histology

Tissue sections from the small intestine were fixed overnight in 4% para-formaldehyde (PFA; Sigma-Aldrich)) at 4°C, followed by 15% (w/v) sucrose and 30% (w/v) sucrose in PBS and embedded in tissue-freezing medium for cryo-sectioning (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). 5–7 μm sections were cut at a cryostat followed by acetone fixation. Frozen sections were shortly thawed at 42°C, rehydrated in PBS and blocked in TNB buffer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) containing 40 μg/mL anti-CD16/CD32 antibody (2.4G2, BioXcell) and 2% serum of the host the secondary antibodies were raised in. Sections were stained for Relm-α (unconjugated, Rabbit-anti mouse; abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD68 (Alexa Fluor 647- or Alexa Flour 488-conjugated, clone FA-11; BioLegend) or Arg1 (V-20 form Santa Cruz or D4E3M from Cell Signaling), Relm-β (unconjugated, Goat-anti-Mouse, R&D, Minneapolis, MN) Lysozyme (unconjugated Rabbit-anti-Mouse from Invitrogen), DCLK1 (unconjugated, Rabbit-anti-Mouse, abcam), Ki67 (D3B5 from Cell Signaling) and Epcam (Alexa Fluor 647- or Alexa Flour 488-conjugated, G8.8; BioLegend). Donkey-anti-Rabbit IgG coupled to Rhodamin-Red-X, Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 647 and Donkey-anti-Goat IgG coupled to Alexa Flour 488 (all Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) were used as secondary antibody and cell nuclei were stained with 4,6 diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) contained in Fluoroshield with DAPI histology mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich). Stained sections were analysed on a confocal LSM700 microscope or a Axio VertA.1 microscope using the ZEN software (all Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometric analysis was performed in accordance to published guidelines [46]. PEC cells were collected in PBS. Whole blood was collected in FACS blood buffer (2% FCS (v/v), 0.1% NaN3 (v/v), 2000 U/L Heparin, in PBS) and applied to red blood cell lysis. Mesenteric lymph nodes were collected in PBS and gently meshed through a 70 μm filter to obtain single cell suspensions. For flow cytometry analysis of GC B cells, acid treatment was performed to remove cytophilic immunoglobulins from the cell surface. In brief, pellets of single cell suspensions were incubated with 1 mL acid buffer (0.085 M NaCl, 0.005 M KCl, 0.01 M EDTA, 0.05 M Na-Acetate, pH 4.0) for 2 min, followed by 0.5 mL FCS for 2 min and then washed twice with FACS buffer before surface staining. Unspecific staining was blocked by 5 min incubation with anti-CD16/CD32 antibody (2.4G2, BioXcell) prior to surface staining at 4°C for 25 min. Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 506 (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to discriminate between dead and living cells. The following antibodies were used for surface stain: from eBioscience: CD4-FITC (RM4.4 and RM4-5), CD8-PE (53–6.7), CD11b-eFluor780 (M1/70), CD19-PE-Cy7 (1D3), F4/80-PerCP-Cy5-5 (BM8) and from BD (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA): B220-BV711 (RA3-6B2), CD8-BUV737 (53–6.7), IgG1-BUV737 (A85-1), IgG2a/b-BUV395 (R2-40), Ly6G-BUV395 (1A8), PD-L2-APC (Ty25), Siglec-F-BV421 (E50-2440) and from BioLegend (SanDiego, CA): CD11b-FITC (M1/70), CD38-PerCP-Cy5-5 (90), F4/80-PE-Cy7 (BM8), GL7-PE (GL7). To determine the purity of isolated B cells and BMDM the following antibodies were used: F4/80-FITC or F4/80-BV421 (BM8), B220-PerCP-Cy5-5 or B220-BV421 (RA3-6B2) (all BioLegend) and CD19-eFluor780 (1D3, eBioscience). For IgG1-BUV737 (A85-1) intracellular staining was performed in addition. Cells were fixed and permeabilized with the BD Phosflow Fix and BD Phosflow Perm/Wash Buffer according to the company’s protocol and stained intracellular for 25 min. Cells were acquired on a BD LSRFortessa (BD Bioscience).

Quantification of histology

Briefly, the number of AAMs or of secretory epithelial subsets in histological sections was approximated by using the “AND” function in Fiji software. For Relm-α and Arg1 stainings, overlap of DAPI and CD68 defined macrophages and DAPI+CD68+ macrophages that overlap with Relm-α or Arg1 were quantified. For Lysozyme and DCLK1, co-staining of these markers with DAPI was quantified. For quantification of Relm-β, DAPI+Epcam+ cells were defined as IECs and co-staining of these with Relm-β was quantified in Fiji (for S7 Fig). Due to technical difficulties, quantification of Relm-β for Fig 5 and S5 Fig, Relm-β+ spots in the epithelial region were counted manually here. Images with a magnification of 10x or 20x were used for Relm-α, Arg1 and Ki67. For Relm-β, DCLK1 and Lysozyme stainings a magnification of 5x was used.

Statistical analysis

SigmaPlot Software (12.3, Systat Software, San Jose, CA) was used to analyse data for statistical significance and to create graphs. Data are displayed as mean + SEM. Statistically significant differences between two groups were determined by Student’s t-test. For comparison of more than two groups, One-Way ANOVA or Two-Way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post-hoc testing was used, depending on the number of factors included in the experimental setup, as indicated in the figure legends. In case normality or equal variance were not given, One-Way ANOVA was replaced by Kruskal Wallis test with Dunn’s post-hoc test. The levels of significance used, were * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01 and *** p≤0.001.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR analyses.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Graphical abstract.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. (related to Fig 1).

AAMs in IL-4c-treated Mac-STAT6 mice.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. (related to Fig 2). Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) infected Mac-STAT6 mice.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. (related to Fig 2).

Antibody and germinal center response of Hpb infected Mac-STAT6 mice.

(PDF)

S5 Fig. (related to Fig 2).

Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis.

(PDF)

S6 Fig. (related to Fig 4).

Immune cell compartments in PEC and mLN of VillinCre_STAT6vt mice.

(PDF)

S7 Fig. (related to Fig 5).

Immune cell compartments in PEC and mLN of VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl mice.

(PDF)

S8 Fig. (related to Fig 6).

Epithelial cell histology for 4-13Tko mice.

(PDF)

S1 Raw Data. Shows the values used to generate bar graphs.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniela Döhler for technical support, Natalie Thuma and Paul Haase for experimental advice, Ulrike Schleicher for providing Tie2Cre_Arg1fl/fl mice, Frank Brombacher for providing IL-4Rαfl/fl mice on B6 background, and members of the Voehringer lab for helpful discussions.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are all included in the manuscript. Raw data for bar graphs are provided in the supplement (Raw data graphs).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant CRC1181_A02 to D.V. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. The Lancet. 2006;367(9521):1521–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68653-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Appleton CC, Mosala TI, Levin J, Olsen A. Geohelminth infection and re-infection after chemotherapy among slum-dwelling children in Durban, South Africa. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009;103(3):249–61. Epub 2009/04/04. doi: 10.1179/136485909X398212 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bouchery T, Volpe B, Shah K, Lebon L, Filbey K, LeGros G, et al. The Study of Host Immune Responses Elicited by the Model Murine Hookworms Nippostrongylus brasiliensis and Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2017;7(4):236–86. Epub 2017/12/21. doi: 10.1002/cpmo.34 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Camberis M, Le Gros G, Urban J, Jr. Animal model of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis and Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2003;Chapter 19:Unit 19 2. Epub 2008/04/25. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1912s55 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gause WC, Urban JF Jr., Stadecker MJ. The immune response to parasitic helminths: insights from murine models. Trends Immunol. 2003;24(5):269–77. Epub 2003/05/10. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(03)00101-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morimoto M, Morimoto M, Whitmire J, Xiao S, Anthony RM, Mirakami H, et al. Peripheral CD4 T cells rapidly accumulate at the host: parasite interface during an inflammatory Th2 memory response. J Immunol. 2004;172(4):2424–30. Epub 2004/02/07. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.4.2424 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anthony RM, Urban JF Jr, Alem F, Hamed HA, Rozo CT, Boucher JL, et al. Memory T(H)2 cells induce alternatively activated macrophages to mediate protection against nematode parasites. Nat Med. 2006;12(8):955–60. Epub 2006/08/08. doi: 10.1038/nm1451 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1955764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krljanac B, Schubart S, Naumann R, Wirtz S, Culemann S, Krönke G, et al. RELMa-expressing macrophages protect against fatal lung damage and reduce parasite burden during helminth infection. Sci Immunol. 2019;4(35):eaau3814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schwartz C, Turqueti-Neves A, Hartmann S, Yu P, Nimmerjahn F, Voehringer D. Basophil-mediated protection against gastrointestinal helminths requires IgE-induced cytokine secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(48):E5169–77. Epub 2014/11/19. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412663111 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4260590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hepworth MR. Mast cells orchestrate type 2 immunity to helminths through regulation of tissue-derived cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(17):6644–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112268109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daly CM, Mayrhofer G, Dent LA. Trapping and immobilization of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis larvae at the site of inoculation in primary infections of interleukin-5 transgenic mice. Infect Immun. 1999;67(10):5315–23. Epub 1999/09/25. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.10.5315-5323.1999 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC96886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neill DR, Wong SH, Bellosi A, Flynn RJ, Daly M, Langford TK, et al. Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1367–70. Epub 2010/03/05. doi: 10.1038/nature08900 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2862165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Allen JE, Sutherland TE. Host protective roles of type 2 immunity: parasite killing and tissue repair, flip sides of the same coin. Semin Immunol. 2014;26(4):329–40. Epub 2014/07/17. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.06.003 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4179909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huber S, Hoffmann R, Muskens F, Voehringer D. Alternatively activated macrophages inhibit T-cell proliferation by Stat6-dependent expression of PD-L2. Blood. 2010;116(17):3311–20. Epub 2010/07/14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-271981 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stutz AM, Pickart LA, Trifilieff A, Baumruker T, Prieschl-Strassmayr E, Woisetschlager M. The Th2 cell cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 regulate found in inflammatory zone 1/resistin-like molecule alpha gene expression by a STAT6 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 2003;170(4):1789–96. Epub 2003/02/08. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.1789 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sutherland TE, Ruckerl D, Logan N, Duncan S, Wynn TA, Allen JE. Ym1 induces RELMalpha and rescues IL-4Ralpha deficiency in lung repair during nematode infection. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(11):e1007423. Epub 2018/12/01. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007423 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6291165 has a financial or non-financial professional or personal relationship with GlaxoSmithKlein. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pesce JT, Ramalingam TR, Mentink-Kane MM, Wilson MS, El Kasmi KC, Smith AM, et al. Arginase-1-expressing macrophages suppress Th2 cytokine-driven inflammation and fibrosis. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(4):e1000371. Epub 2009/04/11. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000371 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2660425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pesce JT, Ramalingam TR, Wilson MS, Mentink-Kane MM, Thompson RW, Cheever AW, et al. Retnla (relmalpha/fizz1) suppresses helminth-induced Th2-type immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(4):e1000393. Epub 2009/04/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000393 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2663845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nair MG, Du Y, Perrigoue JG, Zaph C, Taylor JJ, Goldschmidt M, et al. Alternatively activated macrophage-derived RELM-{alpha} is a negative regulator of type 2 inflammation in the lung. J Exp Med. 2009;206(4):937–52. Epub 2009/04/08. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082048 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2715126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen G, Wang SH, Jang JC, Odegaard JI, Nair MG. Comparison of RELMalpha and RELMbeta Single- and Double-Gene-Deficient Mice Reveals that RELMalpha Expression Dictates Inflammation and Worm Expulsion in Hookworm Infection. Infect Immun. 2016;84(4):1100–11. Epub 2016/02/03. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01479-15 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4807501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Batugedara HM, Li J, Chen G, Lu D, Patel JJ, Jang JC, et al. Hematopoietic cell-derived RELMalpha regulates hookworm immunity through effects on macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;104(4):855–69. Epub 2018/07/12. doi: 10.1002/JLB.4A0917-369RR ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6354768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schubart C, Krljanac B, Otte M, Symowski C, Martini E, Gunther C, et al. Selective expression of constitutively activated STAT6 in intestinal epithelial cells promotes differentiation of secretory cells and protection against helminths. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12(2):413–24. Epub 2018/11/18. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0107-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Daniel C, Salvekar A, Schindler U. A gain-of-function mutation in STAT6. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(19):14255–9. Epub 2000/04/05. doi: 10.1074/jbc.c000129200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mikita T, Daniel C, Wu P, Schindler U. Mutational analysis of the STAT6 SH2 domain. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(28):17634–42. Epub 1998/07/04. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.28.17634 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Haase P, Mokada-Gopal L, Radtke D, Voehringer D. Modulation of the humoral immune response by constitutively active STAT6 expression in murine B cells. Eur J Immunol. 2020;50(4):558–67. Epub 2019/12/06. doi: 10.1002/eji.201948313 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Urban JF Jr, Katona IM, Finkelman FD. Heligmosomoides polygyrus: CD4+ but not CD8+ T cells regulate the IgE response and protective immunity in mice. Exp Parasitol. 1991;73(4):500–11. Epub 1991/11/11. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(91)90074-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Svedberg FR, Brown SL, Krauss MZ, Campbell L, Sharpe C, Clausen M, et al. The lung environment controls alveolar macrophage metabolism and responsiveness in type 2 inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(5):571–80. Epub 2019/04/03. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0352-y ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8381729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Esser-von Bieren J, Volpe B, Kulagin M, Sutherland DB, Guiet R, Seitz A, et al. Antibody-mediated trapping of helminth larvae requires CD11b and Fcgamma receptor I. J Immunol. 2015;194(3):1154–63. Epub 2014/12/31. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401645 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4298127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.El Kasmi KC, Qualls JE, Pesce JT, Smith AM, Thompson RW, Henao-Tamayo M, et al. Toll-like receptor-induced arginase 1 in macrophages thwarts effective immunity against intracellular pathogens. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(12):1399–406. Epub 2008/11/04. doi: 10.1038/ni.1671 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2584974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Entwistle LJ, Pelly VS, Coomes SM, Kannan Y, Perez-Lloret J, Czieso S, et al. Epithelial-Cell-Derived Phospholipase A(2) Group 1B Is an Endogenous Anthelmintic. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22(4):484–93 e5. Epub 2017/10/13. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.09.006 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5644720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Noel W, Raes G, Hassanzadeh Ghassabeh G, De Baetselier P, Beschin A. Alternatively activated macrophages during parasite infections. Trends Parasitol. 2004;20(3):126–33. Epub 2004/03/24. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.01.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Obata-Ninomiya K, Ishiwata K, Tsutsui H, Nei Y, Yoshikawa S, Kawano Y, et al. The skin is an important bulwark of acquired immunity against intestinal helminths. J Exp Med. 2013;210(12):2583–95. Epub 2013/10/30. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130761 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3832932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Urban JF Jr, Maliszewski CR, Madden KB, Katona IM, Finkelman FD. IL-4 treatment can cure established gastrointestinal nematode infections in immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. J Immunol. 1995;154(9):4675–84. Epub 1995/05/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Urban JF Jr, Noben-Trauth N, Schopf L, Madden KB, Finkelman FD. Cutting edge: IL-4 receptor expression by non-bone marrow-derived cells is required to expel gastrointestinal nematode parasites. J Immunol. 2001;167(11):6078–81. Epub 2001/11/21. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.11.6078 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao A, McDermott J, Urban JF Jr, Gause W, Madden KB, Yeung KA, et al. Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and nematode-induced alterations in murine small intestinal smooth muscle contractility on Stat6 and enteric nerves. J Immunol. 2003;171(2):948–54. Epub 2003/07/09. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.2.948 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Herbert DR, Yang JQ, Hogan SP, Groschwitz K, Khodoun M, Munitz A, et al. Intestinal epithelial cell secretion of RELM-beta protects against gastrointestinal worm infection. J Exp Med. 2009;206(13):2947–57. Epub 2009/12/10. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091268 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2806463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhao M, Ren K, Xiong X, Xin Y, Zou Y, Maynard JC, et al. Epithelial STAT6 O-GlcNAcylation drives a concerted anti-helminth alarmin response dependent on tuft cell hyperplasia and Gasdermin C. Immunity. 2022;55(4):623–38 e5. Epub 2022/04/07. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.03.009 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9109499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Artis D, Wang ML, Keilbaugh SA, He W, Swain GP, Knight PA, et al. RELMß/FIZZ2 is a goblet cell-specific immune-effector molecule in the gastrointestinal tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(37):13596–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Oeser K, Schwartz C, Voehringer D. Conditional IL-4/IL-13-deficient mice reveal a critical role of innate immune cells for protective immunity against gastrointestinal helminths. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8(3):672–82. Epub 2014/10/23. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.101 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, Förster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Research. 1999;8(4):265–77. doi: 10.1023/a:1008942828960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Takeda K, Kamanaka M, Tanaka T, Kishimoto T, Akira S. Impaired IL-13-mediated functions of macrophages in STAT6-deficient mice. J Immunol. 1996;157(8):3220–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Herbert DR, Holscher C, Mohrs M, Arendse B, Schwegmann A, Radwanska M, et al. Alternative macrophage activation is essential for survival during schistosomiasis and downmodulates T helper 1 responses and immunopathology. Immunity. 2004;20(5):623–35. Epub 2004/05/15. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00107-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schwartz C, Oeser K, Prazeres da Costa C, Layland LE, Voehringer D. T cell-derived IL-4/IL-13 protects mice against fatal Schistosoma mansoni infection independently of basophils. J Immunol. 2014;193(7):3590–9. Epub 2014/08/31. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401155 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McKenzie G, Fallon PG, Emson CL, Grencis RK, McKenzie ANJ. Simultaneous disruption of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 defines individual roles in T helper cell type 2-mediated responses. J Exp Med. 1999;189(10):1565–72. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.10.1565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Finkelman FD, Madden KB, Morris SC, Holmes JM, Boiani N, Katona IM, et al. Anti-cytokine antibodies as carrier proteins. Prolongation of in vivo effects of exogenous cytokines by injection of cytokine-anti-cytokine antibody complexes. J Immunol. 1993;151(3):1235–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cossarizza A, Chang HD, Radbruch A, Abrignani S, Addo R, Akdis M, et al. Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition). Eur J Immunol. 2021;51(12):2708–3145. Epub 2021/12/16. doi: 10.1002/eji.202170126 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

P'ng Loke, Meera Goh Nair

28 Oct 2022

Dear Dr. Voehringer,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Th2-dependent STAT6-regulated genes in intestinal epithelial cells mediate larval trapping during secondary Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri infection" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

All reviewers agree that the topic of investigating epithelial cell mechanisms in intestinal helminth infections is interesting, but provide valid comments that should be addressed, These include better clarification in the manuscript text, addition of controls, and additional immune and parasite data.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Meera Goh Nair

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

P'ng Loke

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

​orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

All reviewers agree that the topic of investigating epithelial cell mechanisms in intestinal helminth infections is interesting, but provide valid comments that should be addressed, These include better clarification in the manuscript text, addition of controls, and additional immune and parasite data.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The article by Westermann et al describes the involvement of intestinal epithelial cells activation by IL-4/IL/13 in Heligmosmoides polygyrus trapping that occurs during secondary infection. In particular, they prove that macrophages arginase is not required for parasite trapping. This subject is of interest to the community, however I am not sure that the absence of macrophage requirement is proven nor does epithelial involvement in secondary protection is actually proven in the current version of the paper.

Number of repeats are sometimes too low for statistical analysis (example Fig3A) as 2 is not representative of a population.

Many control are missing :For figure 1, WT+IL-4c should be presented as well for worm count and for histology. For figure 4, primary control would be useful, as their is already protection happening in those mice during primary infection (both for worm count and histology).

Reviewer #2: The manuscript explores further how infection with Hpb is controlled by recall immunity. Work from the Gause group has previously demonstrated an important role for AAM in immune memory against Hpb.

In this study the authors explore this relationship further. Using mice expressing only STAT6 in macrophages they identify that when type 2 sufficiency is only present in Macs recall immunity is impaired. Moreover in an Arg1 -/- setting recall immunity is maintained. This is contrary to previous studies using arignase inhibitors. However, this may be explained by maintenance of increased expression of other AAM associated markers.

The authors then address the role of epithelieal cells in contributing to the effector response that promotes recall immunity. The authors identify that an effective epithelial memory response can be launched where STAT-6 is inherently expressed in epithelial cells and CD4 T cells are depleted.

The authors then show that in the absence of IL-4 and IL-13 from T cells recall immunity is impaired.

Therefore recall immunity is driven by a epithelial response which requires CD4 T cell promotion.

Reviewer #3: The authors use a well-characterized model of helminth infection in mice, with H. polygyrus, to establish requirements for larval trapping in the submucosa following secondary infection, which has been reported to require alternatively-activated macrophages (AAMs) and Arginase-1 (Arg-1), signaling through IL4/13 and STAT6. Using transgenic mouse constructs they report that Arg1 is in their hands not required, and that STAT6 activation in AAMs not sufficient for trapping. Rather, STAT6 activation in intestinal epithelial cells is required.

The data are somewhat one-dimensional, for example evaluating helminth immunity solely by granulomas with and without trapped larvae (no adult worm recovery or egg counts), presenting immunohistological snapshots without quantification or image analysis. Overall it offers an incremental contribution rather than a conceptual advance.

While this report shifts the focus towards an epithelial cell mechanism, there is no attempt to provide accompanying data on immune cell phenotypes in the different settings, and the paper does not advance far at any molecular level other than measuring the “usual suspects”. In particular, the authors miss the opportunity of using these mouse constructs (particularly the VillinCre-STAT6vt) for gene expression profiling and identification of the pathway within the epithelial population associated with immunity.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: - Antibodies have previously been shown to be important for trapping of Heligmosmoides (Hp) during secondary infection (10.4049/jimmunol.1401645). The author supplement their Mac-STAT6 with IL-4c to activate macrophage into "M2" however, this is known to not be sufficient for trapping of Hp larvae. Have the author verified if the antibody response against Hp is normal in their Mac-STAT6 mice, as a defect in antibody response would certainly explain why the mice fail to trap the parasite regardless of the M2 polarisation. Of note, to our knowledge IL-4c supplementation in a naive mice has not been shown to be sufficient for Hp trapping (the protocol the authors refer to is for macrophage activation in the lungs). This control naive mice + IL-4c+ Hp is required both for worm count and for histology before being able to conclude that STAT6 activation of macrophage is not sufficient for parasite trapping.

In FigS1, the authors actually report only 18.6% of peritoneal macrophage activated after IL-4c, which is really low. Only PDL-2 is used as activation marker (and not actually used anywhere else in the article), how are the classical M2 markers behaving :ARg1, RELMa, STAT6P ... As the IHC pictures are not presented per channel but only as merged, it is difficult to conclude if the macrophage are even activated in the STAT6MAc+IL4c.

- Figure 3, a quantification of macrophage number in the mucosa, based on histology or flow cytometry to validate that ARg1 depletion is not affecting macrophage recruitment is necessary to reach conclusion. One could quantify peritoneal macrophages as a surrogate.

- The use of the Villin_creSTAT6vt for secondary infection is very confusing. Indeed, the authors have previously shown that trapping takes place in those mice during primary infection and to a similar extent to what is reported here with the isotype control (about 60 granulomas with larvae). There seems to be no further protection due to reinfection. As such I fail to see the meaning of depleting CD4 T cells (previously shown to be required for secondary protection but not primary). Furthermore, the depletion of CD4Tcells in the control mice do not significantly impact the number of granulomas containing larvae. The conclusion of the authors "223 T cells are essential for larval trapping and activation of IECs in secondary Hpb infection." is not currently substantiated by their results.

The authors further state "However, the need for CD4+ 224 T cells could be overcome by

225 expression of a constitutively active form of STAT6 in IECs, emphasizing the prominent role

226 of STAT6-regulated genes in IECs in contributing to larval trapping", however they do not analyse what is the activation of those IECs, or their number. IHC of at least RELmb and an epithelial marker should be presented.

In absence of T cells, the author reports stronger RELmb expression, which contraditcs their claim that T cells are required for activation of IECs.

- Finally, the authors show that IL-4/IL-13 derived from T cells is required for protection. While this is well clear, they also state that this is required for IEC activation. However, here they only report total gene expression of RELMb in the intestine, which is not satisfactory to fully describe an epithelial activation. Could the authors look at proliferation of epithelial cells surrounding the larvae in the granuloma, show that those cells upregulate RELMb maybe even Phospholipase A2, which has already been shown to be important for protection during reinfection. RELMb role in primary expulsion has been established but not in trapping of the larvae during secondary. The authors could prove that RELMbKO mice are not protected during reinfection.

Reviewer #2: The paper is really interesting but I feel could be hard for researchers to grasp.

The authors should include a graphical illustration which highlights the findings from this study in the context of input to recall immunity to Hpb.

This should also highlight the authors thoughts on the importance of AAM. This is the potentially contentious issue with this manuscript. The authors do explain and justify extremely well the reasons for this difference. However, use of an illustration to highlight how this study introduces new insights into the role of epithelial cells and macs in recall immunity really will promote the message of this study.

Reviewer #3: Major Issues

1. The authors do not present any further information on the cellular responses in the different mouse models, which would be important data to understand the mechanisms at play. For example are all other compartments (CD4, ILC2, eosinophils…) normal in the mice unable to trap larvae? What is different about the cellular response in the VillinCre-STAT6vt mice?

2. The authors entitle Figure 2 “AAMs are not sufficient for larval trapping”; however the authors do not show data to document that in vivo AAM development is equal in the WT and Mac-STAT6 mice, they rely on in vitro phenotypes as shown in Figure 1.

3. Interpretation of the immunohistology sections relies on subjective judgement, which is questionable. For example, (lines 144-146) “Relm-a was abundantly expressed in IL4c-treated Mac-STAT6 mice” whereas comparison with the WT panel shows a very substantial reduction; hence it would appear (in contrast to the statement on lines 150-151) that both Relm-a and Arg-1 and Relm-a are compromised in the Mac-STAT6 mice. For objectivity, and also to ensure that the images are representative, quantification of large number of sections should be performed.

4. In Figure 3 the authors use a genetic KO of arginase-1 to follow up on published work with the pharmacological inhibitor BEC (Anthony et al, 2006 Ref 7). They find however that these mice retain the ability to trap larvae, in contrast to the earlier study. It is unfortunate that the authors did not also include WT mice treated with BEC to establish if the different result is due to the model, or other extraneous factors such as the animal facility being used. (Again Figure 3C is not accompanied by any quantitative analysis)

5. Generally, IL4/13 and STAT6 signaling alter the development of intestinal stem cells towards different specialized cell types. Hence an important dimension missing from Figure 4 is any analysis of goblet, Paneth and tuft cells in the different experimental groups.

6. For Figure 5, the authors use IL4/13 KO mice, both as global and T cell-specific Kos to measure the impact on helminth immunity; as would be predicted, immunity is ablated in both. The insight offered by this new experiment is very limited, as in the absence of T cell cytokines from the outset of infection it is only to be expected that immunity will fail to develop ; it would be more useful to ascertain whether T cell cytokines are required at the time of challenge infection.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: - line 104 : the authors state : "Contrary to expectations and for reasons that remain unclear, STAT6 in the BMDMs of Mac-STAT6 mice was not constitutively phosphorylated". It is unclear to me while constitutive activation of STAT6P would have been expected, as this is usually regarded as M2 polarisation marker.

- For all histology, could the author separate the channels, as it would help see colocalization.

- In figure 2C both in WT and in STAT6Mac there is a strong RELMa staining that do not colocolize with CD68, potentially of epithelial origin. However the authors then use RELMa as a marker of macrophage only as opposed to RELmb as a marker of IEC. Staining for EpCAM or related IEC marker might be helpful in the current setting.

- Fig2D:Why is there Arg1 expression in STAT6KO mice ? Does this actually colocolize with a macrophage marker ? In IL4RKO mice, arginase stain has been previously reported to not be present (10.1371/journal.ppat.1003771). There also seems that there is less Arg1 around the larvae in the MACSTAT6+ IL4c that in the STAT6KO which is confusing. A quantification of the staining would be helping with interpretation. Outlining the larvae as well (as they are quite autofluorescent) would help as well.

-There have been some recent papers with improve cell isolation protocol during Hp infection ( Ferrer-Fon et al, 2020 elife; Bouchery et al, 2017, current protocol). Flowing the intestinal macrophage might thus give a better idea of their actual polarisation.

- Besides, AAMs, defined here by Relm-α and

180 CD68 co-expression, are surrounding the granuloma in a similar amount in mice of both

181 genotypes (Fig 3C, left panel.

Please quantify based on images.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Minor Issues

1. Line 63 Reference 8 describes work with N brasiliensis not H polygyrus as stated here.

2. Lines 65-67 (and throughout the manuscript) – there is no mention of tuft cells

3. Lines 69-78 the text describing previous work lacks insight or detail and any key differences between the studies are not defined. At least 2 references are missing:

G. Chen, S. H. Wang, J. C. Jang, J. I. Odegaard and M. G. Nair: Comparison of RELMα and RELMβ Single- and Double-Gene-Deficient Mice Reveals that RELMα Expression Dictates Inflammation and Worm Expulsion in Hookworm Infection. Infect Immun, 84(4), 1100-1111 (2016) doi:10.1128/IAI.01479-15

H. M. Batugedara, J. Li, G. Chen, D. Lu, J. J. Patel, J. C. Jang, K. C. Radecki, A. C. Burr, D. D. Lo, A. R. Dillman and M. G. Nair: Hematopoietic cell-derived RELMα regulates hookworm immunity through effects on macrophages. J Leukoc Biol (2018) doi:10.1002/JLB.4A0917-369RR

4. Line 79 diverse not divers

5. Figure 1 B : why do most graphs show large effects but no significance?

6. Line 335 where not were

7. Lines 395-403 Methods detailing B cell purification do not appear to be necessary as no data are shown.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

P'ng Loke, Meera Goh Nair

13 Mar 2023

Dear Dr. Voehringer,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Th2-dependent STAT6-regulated genes in intestinal epithelial cells mediate larval trapping during secondary Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri infection' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Meera Goh Nair

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

P'ng Loke

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

​orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Both Editor and Reviewer agree that the resubmitted manuscript is improved and will be of interest to the field and journal readership.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Westermann et al, has substantially improved with revision. It now elegantly show that IECs are involved in protection against Hp during secondary infection. Arginase-1 depletion with a deficient model was shown not to be required for protection, and AAM polarization in absence of STAT6 signaling in IECs is not sufficient to perform killing. Further deciphering of the interplay between epithelial cells and macrophages will be extremely interesting to understand how killing is mediated.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: I am now satisfied with the answer to comments.

Of note, for figure 3A, 2 mice per genotype is still low for any type of interpretation regarding of the change the authors have made to the graph ( a minimum of 3 individuals is always required to perform statistical analysis and to sample a population, and this is a mere minimum)

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: no more issues to report

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

P'ng Loke, Meera Goh Nair

30 Mar 2023

Dear Dr. Voehringer,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Th2-dependent STAT6-regulated genes in intestinal epithelial cells mediate larval trapping during secondary Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri infection," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

​orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR analyses.

    (PDF)

    S1 Fig. Graphical abstract.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. (related to Fig 1).

    AAMs in IL-4c-treated Mac-STAT6 mice.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. (related to Fig 2). Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) infected Mac-STAT6 mice.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. (related to Fig 2).

    Antibody and germinal center response of Hpb infected Mac-STAT6 mice.

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. (related to Fig 2).

    Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis.

    (PDF)

    S6 Fig. (related to Fig 4).

    Immune cell compartments in PEC and mLN of VillinCre_STAT6vt mice.

    (PDF)

    S7 Fig. (related to Fig 5).

    Immune cell compartments in PEC and mLN of VillinCre_IL-4Rαfl/fl mice.

    (PDF)

    S8 Fig. (related to Fig 6).

    Epithelial cell histology for 4-13Tko mice.

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw Data. Shows the values used to generate bar graphs.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer comments Westermann.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are all included in the manuscript. Raw data for bar graphs are provided in the supplement (Raw data graphs).


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES