Abstract
This erratum corrects an error in Table 4 of our paper [Biomed. Opt. Express 13, 1737 (2022) 10.1364/BOE.451628].
We regret that Table 4 [1] incorrectly included the correlation coefficient instead of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as intended. The updated table below includes a new column with the correct ICC calculated using SPSS statistical software with a two-way mixed model and absolute agreement type. We also correct the data reported in the corresponding text: The lowest intraclass correlation coefficient was found for τ2 (0.72). The highest intraclass correlation occurred for the g phasor coordinate (0.97). We note that this error does not change the interpretation or conclusions of the paper.
Table 4. Average data for visit 1 and visit 2 and statistical significance.
| Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Correlation Coefficient | Intraclass correlation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| τm (ps) | 221.11 ± 50.038 | 228.94 ± 38.91 | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| τ1 (ps) | 142.12 ± 36.59 | 148.40 ± 29.78 | 0.61 | 0.75 |
| τ2 (ps) | 1014.62 ± 119.87 | 1028.62 ± 80.63 | 0.59 | 0.72 |
| a1 (%) | 90.36 ± 1.24 | 90.27 ± 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| (g, s) | (0.87 ± 0.01, 0.22 ± 0.01) | (0.87 ± 0.01, 0.22 ± 0.01) | (0.96, 0.86) | (0.97, 0.89) |
Funding
Research to Prevent Blindness10.13039/100001818 (Department of Ophthalmology, Ernest and Elizabeth Althouse, Special Scholar Award (JJH), Unrestricted Grant to the University of Rochester); National Institutes of Health10.13039/100000002 (P30 EY001319, R01 EY004367, R01 EY022371, T32 EY007125).
Disclosures
KP: University of Rochester (P), QY: University of Rochester (P), JJH: University of Rochester (P).
References
- 1.Tang J. A. H., Granger C. E., Kunala K., Parkins K., Huynh K. T., Bowles-Johnson K., Yang Q., Hunter J. J., “Adaptive optics fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy of in vivo human retinal pigment epithelium,” Biomed. Opt. Express 13(3), 1737 (2022). 10.1364/BOE.451628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
