Abstract
Transient gut microbiota alterations have been reported after antibiotic therapy for Helicobacter pylori. However, alteration in the gut virome after H. pylori eradication remains uncertain. Here, we apply metagenomic sequencing to fecal samples of 44 H. pylori-infected patients at baseline, 6-week (N = 44), and 6-month (N = 33) after treatment. Following H. pylori eradication, we discover contraction of the gut virome diversity, separation of virome community with increased community difference, and shifting towards a higher proportion of core virus. While the gut microbiota is altered at 6-week and restored at 6-month, the virome community shows contraction till 6-month after the treatment with enhanced phage-bacteria interactions at 6-week. Multiple courses of antibiotic treatments further lead to lower virus community diversity when compared with treatment naive patients. Our results demonstrate that H. pylori eradication therapies not only result in transient alteration in gut microbiota but also significantly alter the previously less known gut virome community.
Subject terms: Stomach diseases, Microbial ecology, Gastrointestinal diseases
Here, Wang et al. use metagenomic sequencing to explore the impact of antibiotic treatment for Helicobacter pylori on the gut virome community in infected patients, showing that recurrent treatment leads to a lower virus community diversity and altered virus-bacteria interactions, compared with treatment naive patients.
Introduction
It was estimated that 4.4 million individuals in the world were infected with Helicobacter pylori, particularly in Asia where up to 54.7% of population were infected1. H. pylori could cause a broad range of gastrointestinal diseases including peptic ulcer, gastric cancer, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT)2. While eradication of H. pylori by antibiotics could lower the risk of these gastrointestinal diseases, antibiotic treatment can also accidentally reshape the gut microbiota3,4 and impact on host health5–7. Increasing evidence suggests that while gut bacteria play a prominent role in disease development and progression8, factors including diet, lifestyle, host genetics, age, and geographic factors could also contribute to gut bacterial profiling9. Thus far, microbiota studies have demonstrated significantly altered gut microbiota, their associated metabolic functions and interactions with host, after antibiotics treatment for H. pylori10,11.
While the human gut microbiome is a complex environment composed of bacteria, viruses, archaea, and fungi12, most researchers have focused on the changes in gut bacteria after H. pylori-eradication. Nonetheless, the changes in gut virome and its correlation with the host after treatment for H. pylori remains unclear. The healthy gut virome comprises bacteriophages (which infect bacteria), eukaryotic viruses and archaea viruses, which is relatively stable and highly individual-specific with a predominance of Caudoviricetes class (mainly bacteriophages)13–16. Bacteria serve as the natural hosts for bacteriophages, and bacteria-phage coevolution is regarded as a crucial driver of the ecological and evolutionary process of the bacteria community17. Antibiotics used in the eradication therapy may promote the enrichment of some resistant strains, like Escherichia coli, or removal of targeted bacteria species18. Given the effects of antibiotics on microbiota, the impact on bacteriophages is less predictable as the alteration is the result of both phage-bacteria interaction and phage-antibiotic synergy.
Recent studies have suggested the potential associations between gut virome and human diseases including type 2 diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease19–21, but the functions or mechanisms underlying the altered viral species were not yet fully understood. Possible mechanisms including the interactions between gut virome and bacteria with reshaping of gut microbiota through lytic or lysogenic life cycles and improving bacteria function through horizontal gene transfer (HGT), which may contribute to human disease pathogenesis22. Understanding the alteration in the gut virome associated with H. pylori eradication may also help to optimize current H. pylori eradication regimens or alleviating the adverse effects of antibiotic treatment through manipulating the microbiome, like fecal virome transplantation (FVT) or phage therapy to reduce the antibiotic resistance.
With the availability of next-generation sequencing, we can further explore the previously non-culturable and unclassified microbes. Several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have revealed disease-specific gut virome dynamics and various virus-bacteria dynamics21,23–25. The NCBI viral RefSeq, the Gut Virome Database (GVD), Integrated Microbial Genomes database (IMG/VR), and the Gut Phage Database (GPD, only phage genome) are frequently used viral sequence databases13,26,27. Through these viral reference databases, we can explore the gut virome dynamics after receiving H. pylori eradication.
In this work, we address the changes in gut virome after H. pylori eradication. We have collected serial stool samples from patients who have received H. pylori eradication therapy and conducted metagenomic sequencing to determine the longitudinal changes in gut virome, microbiome, and virus-bacteria interactions, before and after eradication treatment.
Results
Alteration of viruses at different prevalence levels
Overall, we identified 3581 different viral species from 18,005 qualified contigs, including 12 core viruses (viral species found in over 50% of the samples), 66 common viruses (found in 20–50% of the samples), and 3503 unique viruses (found in less than 20% of the samples), suggesting an individual-specific gut virome pattern. All of the core viruses were bacteriophages, including Faecalibacterium phages (Brigitvirus brigit, Eponavirus epona, Lagaffevirus lagaffe, Mushuvirus mushu, and Toutatisvirus toutatis), Bacteroides phage (CrAss-like virus sp.), Clostridium phage (Clostridium phage c-st), Flavobacterium phage (Immutovirus immuto), Priestia phage (Donellivirus gee), Pseudomonas phage (Knuthellervirus PMBT14), Salmonella phage (Salmonella phage 7-11), and Vibrio phage (Vibrio phage henriette 12B8), whose host was abundant intestinal bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 1). Among which, crAssphage was reported to be highly abundant in human fecal metagenomics28.
The core virus richness diminished 6-week after H. pylori eradication therapy (FDR = 0.002) and gradually restored at 6-month (FDR = 0.382); while common and unique viruses showed a decline both at 6-week (FDR = 0.001 and FDR = 5.44e−05) and 6-month (FDR = 0.003 and FDR = 1.34e−04) after eradication (Fig. 1a). The Sankey diagram indicated the transition from core to common/unique viruses in most of the samples after eradication therapy, consistent with the diminishing of virus richness at different prevalence levels (Supplementary Fig. 2a). We next evaluated the alteration in viral community composition after eradication (Fig. 1b), which indicated that the proportion of core viruses increased (FDR = 0.001), but unique viruses (FDR = 0.006) decreased at 6-month (Supplementary Fig. 2b). These results suggested that the core viruses were more resilient to external challenges like antibiotic exposure compared to common and unique viruses.
Altered virome diversity and composition after eradication therapy
The gut virome diversity and community were significantly altered after eradication therapy. The alpha diversity of the gut virome significantly declined after H. pylori treatment. Compared to the baseline, the total virus richness (Fig. 2a) significantly decreased at 6-week (FDR = 4.74e−05) and 6-month (FDR = 1.94e−04). Both the Shannon index (Fig. 2b) and Simpson index (Fig. 2c) significantly decreased at 6-week (FDR = 0.006 and FDR = 0.02) and failed to return to baseline level 6-month after eradication therapy (FDR = 0.035 and FDR = 0.135). Using principal coordinates analysis (PCoA), we evaluated the beta diversity of the gut virome communities before and after treatment. We found that the baseline virome community was distinct from that at 6-month (PERMANOVA, FDR = 0.012) (Fig. 2d). Further comparison of the average community dissimilarity (Fig. 2e) confirmed that the viral community difference was significantly higher at 6-week (FDR = 0.012) and 6-month (FDR = 0.025) when compared to baseline level, indicating the difference in virome community under the pressure of antibiotic-based eradication.
We next performed differential analysis to investigate the alteration in gut virome composition after eradication therapy at various taxonomy levels. At the class level, the Caudoviricetes class (tailed bacteriophages) was predominant, accounting for over 90% of the viral composition (Supplementary Fig. 3a), while most of them were not assigned at order, family, or genus level (Supplementary Fig. 3b–d). Compared with baseline, the abundance of the Caudoviricetes class showed no significant alteration after eradication therapy (Supplementary Data 3). Further analysis of the alpha diversity indices (Supplementary Fig. 4a) of Caudoviricetes class showed that richness, Shannon index, and Simpson index were all significantly decreased at 6-week (FDR = 2.28e−05, FDR = 0.004, and FDR = 0.012, respectively) and 6-month (FDR = 1.65e−04, FDR = 0.05, and FDR = 0.18, respectively). The beta diversity (Supplementary Fig. 4b) of Caudoviricetes class was separated from baseline at 6-month (PERMANOVA, FDR = 0.024) with increased community structure dissimilarity at both 6-week (FDR = 0.006) and 6-month (FDR = 0.023).
We applied MaAslin2 to identify the viral taxa that were closely associated with H. pylori eradication. At 6-week, we observed 11 bacteriophages that were significantly altered (Fig. 3a and MaAslin2 output in Supplementary Data 3) and of which 9 were enriched, including Bacillus phage (Bacillus phage vB_BhaS-171), Bdellovibrio phage (Bdellovibrio phage phi1422), Clostridium phage (Clostridium phage phiCTP1), Corynebacterium (Samwavirus StAB), Klebsiella phage (Przondovirus KP32), Paenibacillus phage (Paenibacillus phage pG1), Pseudomonas phage (Pseudomonas phage PhiPA3), Staphylococcus phage (Staphylococcus phage StB20), and Yersinia phage (Eneladusvirus Yen904). The abundance of Erwinia phage (Erwinia phage vB_EamM_Phobos) and Chiangmaivirus RSF1 diminished at 6-week. At 6-month (Fig. 3b and MaAslin2 output in Supplementary Data 3), there were 9 bacteriophages that were significantly altered, including Bacillus phage vB_BhaS-171 and Clostridium phage phiCTP1. Other bacteriophages were also enriched at 6-month, including Escherichia phage (Enterobacterial phage mEp390), Pseudomonas phage (Pseudomonas phage phiPSA1), and Yersinia phage (Yersinia phage phiR1-37). Another Escherichia phage (Escherichia phage HK639) diminished at 6-month. Most of these altered bacteriophages after eradication were unique viruses with relatively low prevalence, suggesting that the low prevalence viral species were more likely to be affected by antibiotics, thus leading to the reconstruction of the gut virome community.
Together, these findings showed that H. pylori eradication therapy could result in depletion of gut virome richness, increase in virome community dissimilarity, and reshape of the virome composition.
Different eradication therapies on gut virome alteration
We further explore the associations between different H. pylori eradication therapies and changes in gut virome. Firstly, we analyzed longitudinal alterations of the gut virome in patients with primary treatment (treatment naive) and retreatment (who have failed previous regimens) for H. pylori. The virus richness significantly decreased at 6-week and 6-month in both primary (Supplementary Fig. 5a) and retreatment groups (Supplementary Fig. 5b) (all FDR < 0.05). However, the beta diversity showed no significant separation in both groups (PERMAVONA, FDR > 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 5c, d).
Next, we compared the difference between the two treatment groups. Comparative analysis between the primary and retreatment groups showed that the retreatment group had lower virus richness at baseline, 6-week, and 6-month (all p < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 6a–c), when compared to the primary treatment group. However, no significant separation was found between the two groups in beta diversity (PERMANOVA, all p > 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 6d–f). Although some bacteria and bacteriophage features were detected at baseline between those successfully eradicated and failed subjects (Supplementary Data 3), the functions of these were yet to be determined. Taken together, these results indicated that multiple eradication therapies could have a more profound effect on gut virome.
Asynchronous recovery of virus and bacteria after eradication therapy
Previous studies showed strong and significant correlations between bacteriophages and bacteria in various study populations19,21,29. We characterized all viral species according to their theoretical host. Since the proportion of bacteriophages dominated all other viruses (Supplementary Fig. 7), we first performed diversity analysis on bacteriophages and their associated microbiota. As for the bacteriophage, the phage richness and Shannon index decreased significantly at 6-week when compared to baseline (FDR = 2.9e−05 and FDR = 0.004) and failed to restore at 6-month (FDR = 1.79e−04 and FDR = 0.045) (Fig. 4a). PCoA analysis showed that the community structure of bacteriophage was significantly separated from baseline at 6-month (PERMANOVA, FDR = 0.012) with increased community dissimilarity (FDR = 0.04) (Fig. 4b). However, the composition of bacteriophages showed no significant alterations (Supplementary Data 3).
On the other hand, the diversity of gut bacteria was significantly altered but with a different trend. The bacteria richness and Shannon index decreased at 6-week (FDR = 0.016 and FDR = 0.018) but were restored to baseline level at 6-month (FDR = 0.387 and FDR = 0.052) (Fig. 4c). The beta diversity of bacteria was separated from baseline at 6-week (PERMANOVA, FDR = 0.047) which restored at 6-month (PERMANOVA, FDR = 0.11); and the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of microbiota community displayed higher community difference at 6-week (FDR = 0.018), as compared to baseline and restored to baseline level at 6-month (FDR = 0.077) (Fig. 4d). The difference between the changes in bacteriophages and bacterial diversity indicated that the gut microbiota community was more resilient and easier to recover than the gut virome community after antibiotic-based H. pylori eradication treatment.
We further investigate the correlations between bacteriophage and bacteria on both alpha diversity index and taxonomy level. Bacteria and bacteriophage were all positively correlated at baseline (Pearson, R = 0.67, p = 6e−07; Fig. 5a), 6-week (Pearson, R = 0.78, p = 4.5e−10; Fig. 5b) and 6-month (Pearson, R = 0.56, p = 7.3e−04; Fig. 5c). We also evaluated the correlations between the bacteriophages and the bacteria genera. Overall, we observed a higher number of significant correlations (positive and negative) between phages and bacteria at 6-week (n = 213; Fig. 5d) than baseline (n = 13; Supplementary Fig. 8a) and 6-month (n = 4; Supplementary Fig. 8b). At 6-week, most of the significant correlations (91.07%, 194/213) were positive. While most negative correlations occurred between various bacteriophages and some bacteria genera, including Bacteroides, Flavonifractor, and Fusobacterium (Spearman, ρ range from −0.596 to −0.435; Fig. 5d). Most positive correlations occurred between bacteria genera (Intestinimonas, Faecalibacterium, Sutterella, Anaerobutyricum, Odoribacter, Coprococcus, Faecalibacillus, and Oscillubacter) and bacteriophages like Faecalibacterium phage, Priestia phage, Lactococcus phage, Cellulophage phage, Streptococcus phage, crAssphage, Mycobacterium phage. The abundance of H. pylori prophage (Helicobacter phage phiHP33) was negatively correlated with the Helicobacter genus (Supplementary Fig. 9; R = −0.24, p = 0.008). The correlation analysis indicated a transient but stronger association between phages and bacteria after antibiotic treatment at 6-week, which restored at 6-month, further confirmed the asynchronous restoration of phage and bacteria after treatment.
In addition to the previously reported positive bacteriophage-bacteria correlations after the antibiotic treatment30, the strong and positive correlations between other virus (non-bacteriophages) and bacteria alpha diversity indices (Supplementary Fig. 10) revealed undiscovered cross-kingdom associations among other viruses and bacteria. Similar to the alteration of phage-bacteria correlations after eradication therapy, the significance of the correlation between other viruses and bacteria tended to increase at 6-week (Pearson, R = 0.65, p = 1.8e−06; Supplementary Fig. 10b) and was restored at 6-month (Pearson, R = 0.0.58, p = 3.6e−04; Supplementary Fig. 10c), as compared to baseline (Pearson, R = 0.63, p = 5.4e−06; Supplementary Fig. 10a).
Correlations between antibiotic resistance genes and bacteriophages
We also evaluated the interactions between antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and bacteriophages in view of the previous demonstration of significant correlation of gut ARGs with H. pylori eradication31. Consistent with previous study, various antibiotics treatments led to the enrichment of corresponding ARGs, including multidrug resistance genes (MDR) (acrB, baeR, marA, and mdtP), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) (Escherichia coli emrE and mphA), fluoroquinolone (Escherichia coli gyrA conferring resistance to fluoroquinolone and QnrS1) and other ARGs. We found that Rosemountvirus ZCSE2 was connected to a variety of ARGs glycopeptide resistance genes (vanD, vanHD, vanXD) at 6-week and Cyprinid herpesvirus 2 was connected to various ARGs at 6-month (Supplementary Fig. 11a, b). We next summarized all the bacteriophages that share the same bacteria host at the genus level, the result showed that Faecalibacterium phage and Aurantimonas phage was positively correlated to a variety of ARGs (Supplementary Fig. 11c, d) at 6-week or 6-month. However, none of these single bacteriophage or summarized phages showed significant alteration after antibiotic treatment. We further established the network between bacteria genus and ARGs, and found enriched MDR genes (acrB, baeR, marAm mdtP) to be positively correlated with enriched Shigella and Klebsiella genera at 6-week (Supplementary Fig. 11e, f). These results suggest that the alteration of gut ARGs during the treatment was more likely to be associated with the bacterial host rather than bacteriophages.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the longitudinal changes in gut virome in patients after H. pylori eradication therapy by using the whole-genome shotgun sequencing approach. Our results showed that there was a decrease in virus community diversity, an increase of gut virome difference, and reshaping of the virome community composition after antibiotics treatment for H. pylori eradication. Furthermore, different treatment regimens led to similar changes in gut virome, but repeated courses of H. pylori eradication therapies (in retreatment) could have a more enduring and stronger impact. While the gut microbiota was temporarily altered and was restored to normal at 6-month, the changes in diversity and structure of bacteriophages imposed by eradication therapy were more long lasting. Correlation analysis indicated that the antibiotic exposure promoted the coevolution process of bacteriophage and bacteria, with stronger positive or negative correlations at both diversity and taxa levels. The antibiotic treatment induced ARG enrichment was also more likely to be associated with changes in bacteria rather than bacteriophages.
In contrast to the high temporal intra-individual diversity in infants caused by vigorous colonization process32, healthy adult gut virome was relatively stable13. A previous study reported that 80% of viruses persisted in a healthy adult over a period of 2.5 years33. Cross-sectional studies have reported disease-specific gut virome alteration in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)21, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)20 including ulcerative colitis23, and type 1 or type 2 diabetes19,34 and colorectal cancer35. These studies indicate that the gut virome can be affected in various diseases, however, other environmental factors like medication (antibiotics or immunosuppressants), diet, geographical difference can also influence the bacterial and viral community of the gut36,37. Previous observations suggested prophage diversity was induced after antibiotic treatment in the gut of swine38, which was characterized by an expansion of phages after inhibition of bacteria by antibiotics39. Contrary to these findings, a study in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) patients who received microbiota transfer therapy consisting of 2-week antibiotic treatment showed that the gut phage diversity decreased after vancomycin treatment and recovered later in several subjects40. Similarly, we showed in this study that antibiotics used for H. pylori eradication could cause a decrease of virome (phage) diversity and increase in virome community dissimilarity, suggesting the recovery of gut intestinal inflammation or immune response and a healthier gut virome contributed by H. pylori eradication41.
Previous findings showed that various eradication therapies can lead to different and transient perturbation of the gut microbiota4, we observed both short- and medium-term gut virome alterations after various eradication regimens. One study reported that the phages may inhibit the growth of targeted bacteria and promote the enrichment of normal intestinal microenvironment and commensal42. Besides, majority of the bacteriophages identified in the human gut were temperate phages, which showed relatively lower mutation and evolution rates than the virulent bacteriophages, thereby leading to the different recovery paces of viral and bacterial communities33. Another possible reason for the different recovery paces may be caused by the spatially restructured bacterial community or microenvironment which contributes to the bacteria escape from antibiotic and phage attack43. Moreover, our results showed lower virome diversity in the retreatment group (who had failed prior eradication therapy) as compared to the primary treatment group up to 6-month after eradication therapy, further supporting the findings that the gut virome may be irreversibly altered by the eradication therapy and multiple courses of eradication therapies could have more long-lasting impacts on the virome community. Further large-scale studies involving various regimens will be needed to validate the impact of the different eradication regimens on the gut virome.
We observed transiently enhanced phage-bacteria correlations at 6-week at both diversity and taxonomy level, with an increased number of positive or negative bacteriophage-bacteria correlations, which may result from the complex phage-bacteria coevolution dynamic under antibiotic induced stress44,45. Moreover, we observed that antibiotic treatment could impact some of the gut bacteria19 and thus indirectly alter the abundance and prevalence of phages. For example, the abundance of Bacillus, Bdellovibrio, Corynebacterium, Klebsiella, and Synechococcus genera were enriched after the eradication therapy (Supplementary Data 3), corresponding to the enrichment of Bacillus phage (Bacillus phage vB_BhaS-171), Bdellovibrio phage (Bdellovibrio phage phi1422), Corynebacterium phage (Samwavirus StAB), Klebsiella phage (Przondovirus KP32), and Synechococcus phage (Llyrvirus SSKS1). Bdellovibrio phage phi1422 was reported to be discovered in the blood of more than 50% of healthy individuals in a recent study46. As bacteria hosts can carry multiple phages at the same time, the alteration in a single bacteriophage may not follow the alteration of the bacteria host. For example, the abundance of Enterobacterial phage mEp390 (Escherichia phage) enriched and Escherichia phage HK639 diminished after eradication, while the abundance of Escherichia genus enriched after eradication. Yet, the functions of these bacteriophages would need to be validated by further studies. On the other hand, the enhanced bacteriophage-bacteria interactions and the abundant tailed bacteriophages from the class Caudoviricetes suggested that there were higher chances of phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in human gut47, such as transferring phiHP33 orthologous genes to H. pylori strains, which was associated with H. pylori virulence markers cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) and vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA)48.
In addition to the ability to infect the pathogens in the human gut, the bacteriophages or phage-derived particles (referred to as mobile genetic elements) are also capable of carrying and transferring antibiotic resistance genes into bacteria horizontally49 and promote the emergence of antibiotic-resistance intestinal flora50,51. However, our study showed that the enrichment of ARGs were more closely related to the bacteria host rather than bacteriophage. A previous study showed that none of the prophages identified carry known antimicrobial resistance genes, suggesting that ARGs are rarely encoded in phages and phages may not be responsible for ARG transfer52,53. The prevalence of H. pylori prophages is estimated to be ~21%54. Previous studies have identified the presence of phiHP33 phage sequences and other prophages (Schmidvirus KHP30, Schmidvirus KHP40, and Schmidvirus sv1961P) in H. pylori strains48,55. Although no significant alteration was observed in these H. pylori phages, the phiHP33 prophage showed significant correlation with the abundance of Helicobacter genus. Considering the presence of prophages in H. pylori, studies targeting the prophage genes related to the lysis cassette are useful for phage therapy56. In addition to the phage itself, the phage-encoded lysins and related bacteriolytic enzymes are also considered as potential alternatives to antibiotics in view of the increasing antibiotic resistance57.
There are several limitations of this study. First, compared to the current bacteria sequence databases, the limited bacteriophage sequences in the public databases hamper the identification of bacterial host for phages and significantly limit the gut virome study. Second, whether various eradication therapies work differently on the gut virome need to be validated in future large-scale studies due to the small sample size of this pilot study. Third, a previous study revealed a time-dependent manner of the impacts of antibiotics on bacteriophages that targeted Pseudomonas aeruginosa37. In this study, we observed a decrease of the virome community 6-month after the eradication therapy and a longer observation period will be needed to fully understand the alteration of gut virome. Fourth, we relied on the similarity of predicted ORFs to Viral RefSeq to obtain viral taxonomy information, which could limit the scope of viral diversity being detected. To address this limitation, we have considered other viral database such as Gut Phage Database (GPD)26 which contains over 140,000 viral contigs detected from public metagenomic data. However, these viral genomes only provide taxonomy annotation at the family level. Considering Viral RefSeq has been widely used in many recent studies20,29, we believe this is the most appropriate approach for our study. Finally, as current metagenomic sequencing approach ignored RNA viruses and was not capable of differentiating between active and dormant phages without wet lab approaches, the role of gut eukaryotic viruses could be undervalued58,59. Future works targeting eukaryotic viruses and perfecting the phage database will be necessary.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the impacts of H. pylori eradication in reshaping gut virome, gut microbiota, and viral-bacteria cross-kingdom interactions using metagenomic methods. Our findings highlight the changes in the previously less explored part of the gut microenvironment related to antibiotics treatment for H. pylori.
Methods
Patient characteristics, stool sample collection, and sequencing
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (UW 18-413). Each patient provided written informed consent for receiving H. pylori eradication treatment by their attending clinicians and providing stool samples for this study. We included 44 adult patients with confirmed H. pylori infection, by urea breath test (C13-UBT) or endoscopic-based tests. For treatment naive patients (n = 21), clarithromycin-based triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) was given. For patients who had failed previous eradication therapy (n = 23), levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy, bismuth quadruple therapy, or other combinations were given depending on their previous treatment regimens. The average number of prior therapies in the retreatment group was 1.91. Urea breath test (C13-UBT) was used to confirm the success of H. pylori eradication after treatment, which was the standard of care in our hospital. The authors were not involved in the treatments, all the treatment was standard of care and the detailed therapy information was provided in Supplementary Data 1. For patients who failed prior therapy, prior eradication regimens were also included in Supplementary Data 2.
Stool samples were collected at baseline, 6-week, and 6-month after the completion of the eradication therapy. Stool samples were collected using OMNIgene⋅Gut collection tubes (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, Canada) and were firstly stored at −20 °C before being transferred for DNA extraction. Whole-genome DNA was extracted according to the instruction of the QIAsymphony DSP Virus/Pathogen Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA). Briefly, 200 μl stool sample was obtained from the OMNIgene GUT collection tube and then diluted with 800 μl saline, 50 μl lysozyme (20 mg/ml), 2.5 μl mutanolysin (25 U/μl), 3 μl lysostaphin (4 U/μl) at 37 °C for one hour. Subsequently, the samples were placed in the TissueLyser II (Qiagen, cat. No. 85300) for 10 min at 30 Hz for efficient disruption of the samples and 40 μl proteinase K was applied later at 56 °C for two hours. Total DNA was then extracted from 400 μl mixture using the QIAsymphony machine with the DSP Virus/Pathogen Kit. KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KR0961-V1.14) protocol was used for stool DNA library preparation and construction. 50 ng of extracted DNA was used for the library preparation in each sample. Briefly, the dsDNA was fragmented as end-repaired and A-tailing at 3′ end; the adaptor was ligated with an IDT dual-indexed UMI adaptor system at the terminal ends. The amplified DNA library was validated by Qubit and qPCR for quality control. After diluted to optimal concentration, Illumina NovaSeq 6000 System (Illumina, USA, Paired-end 2 × 150 bp) was used for metagenomic sequencing. The sequencing generated around 54 million reads for each sample (range from 43.35 to 68.69 million).
Putative viral contigs identification
Raw reads were cleaned by quality control (FastQC v0.11.9), followed by removing low-quality reads and filtering human genome contamination by BBMap v38.86 (parameters minid = 0.95 maxindel = 3 bwr = 0.16 bw = 12 minhits = 2 trimq = 10)60. MEGAHIT v1.2.161 was used to assemble the paired-end reads into contigs using the default parameter (contigs shorter than 200 bp were discarded). In total, 15,516,991 contigs were obtained from 121 samples. To identify viral contigs from assembled metagenome contigs, VirSorter v1.0.562 and DeepVirFinder63 were used to discriminate contigs with a viral or bacterial origin. Reference database of VirSorter was constructed from Refseq viral proteins and viral genomes from published metagenomic samples. DeepVirFinder used a machine learning method for the identification of unknown and short viral sequences with high performance. For VirSorter, contigs longer than 5 kb or circular contigs over 1.5 kb were regarded as potential viral contigs. For DeepVirFinder, contigs longer than 500 were collected for the viral contig identification following a previous study64. A contig would be included as a candidate viral contig if it was either in VirSorter result or DeepVirFinder result.
We adopted the false positive removal procedures that were applied in construction of GVD database13. The protein sequences of ORFs (using Prodigal65) were aligned to bacterial and viral database for the verification of candidate viral contigs. Firstly, CAT66 used the bacteria taxonomy database constructed from NCBI non-redundant proteins and assigned a contig to bacteria or viral species by protein alignment results of ORFs. For each contig, the proportion of ORFs that can align to bacteria genes was counted. The larger the proportion was, the less likely the contig was a viral genome. If a candidate viral contig was assigned to a bacteria species and over 40% of its ORFs supported the assignment, the contig was discarded. After this step, the remaining contigs were aligned to VPF67, a viral gene HMM database. If a contig had at least three hits (e-value <0.05) on VPF database, the contig was a valid viral contig. Otherwise, it would align to BUSCO68 using hmmsearch69, which contained bacteria gene database as the final filtering step. Similar with CAT alignment, we calculated the ratio of ORFs that can align to BUSCO database for each contig. If the BUSCO ratio was over 0.067, the contig was pruned. The BUSCO database is composed of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) constructed from genes that are conserved in bacteria. The database provides a score cut-off for each HMM. Genes of viral contigs were predicted by Prodigal. We applied hmmsearch to identify genes from viral contigs against HMMs in the BUSCO database. If a gene located at [x, y] in a viral contig was mapped to a BUSCO HMM with a score exceeding the database-determined cut-off, this gene was regarded as a bacteria gene. The regions excluding [x, y] are defined as non-bacteria regions. These steps resulted in 55,642 candidate contigs.
Taxonomic annotation of viral contigs
Viral contigs in each sample were dereplicated by CD-HIT with 95% nucleotide identity over 85% alignment fraction. Specifically, for each sample, contigs were grouped into clusters from the default output of CD-HIT, and the longest contig per cluster was taken as representative. Then, the taxonomy assignment of viral contigs was performed using BLAST v2.13.070 against NCBI Viral RefSeq proteins. ORFs were predicted and extracted from the assembled contigs using Prodigal. The amino acid sequences of these ORFs were further mapped to the NCBI RefSeq viral proteins. For downstream analysis, only alignment hits of over 50% alignment to viral protein sequences in the RefSeq Viral database (September 2022) in terms of sequence identity/total sequence length were considered as valid hits by BLASTP70 when run with default parameters (listed in Supplementary Methods). The decontam (R) package71 was run via frequency mode after dereplication on the assumption that contaminating DNA was present in uniform concentrations across samples and we have no negative-control samples. Viral taxonomic levels (i.e., species, genus, family, order) were predicted by a majority approach. More specifically, if over 50% of ORFs from a contig were mapped to the reference viral proteins of the same taxonomy (i.e., species, genus, family, order), the contig was assigned to this taxonomy. For example, if a contig had 10 ORFs and at least 5 of them aligned to reference proteins of the same viral species, the contig was assigned to this species. If two viral species report equal number of ORFs, the sum of alignment bit scores would resolve the ambiguity. Also, we required a contig that had at least one ORF with an alignment length of over 20 amino acids to be considered for taxonomic annotation. In the following context, viral species referred to those contigs with assigned taxonomy at species level.
In summary, we obtained 55,642 qualified viral contigs from all samples and 20,264 with a known viral taxonomy. Moreover, as revealed by a recent study that some bacterial contigs can be mis-characterized as nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDV), we verified the taxonomy assignment of 2259 viral contigs that were previously mapped to NCLDV using ViralRecall (VR)72 by two steps. In Step 1, all qualified contigs (N = 2259) were searched against two viral HMM databases: GVODs (specific to NCLDV) and VOGDB (broad characterization of viral signatures) for the identification of NCLDV-specific viral orthologous (mean VR prediction score > 1). The verification confirmed the assignment of 588 NCLDV species (mean VR prediction score > 1). In Step 2, we evaluated the predicted proteins among these contigs (N = 588) by using the Pfam database (v.32) for the identification of virus-unique proteins (e.g., capsid protein) or cellular organisms conserved proteins (e.g., heat-shock proteins). Further evaluation from predicted proteins of these NCLDV contigs suggested none of them has virus unique protein. Thus all 2259 previously assigned NCLDV contigs were excluded from downstream analysis. Finally, 18,005 valid viral contigs with known taxonomy (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, ICTV taxonomy release #37, 2021) were used for downstream analysis. At contigs level, the richness of contigs decreased after the eradication with similar trend as at the species level. Furthermore, viral species assigned to RNA viruses (N = 1533) were removed since our study did not consider the viral RNA during extraction. The dereplicated contig abundance was calculated as the RPKM per known viral species (normalized by contigs length and sequence depth in each sample). The abundance of each taxonomy level was calculated as the sum of the contigs shared the same taxonomic identity (i.e., the abundance of Caudoviricetes class was the RPKM sum of Caudoviricetes contigs). Counts smaller than 0.5 were removed to reduce noise. Finally, we generated a taxonomy table with 3581 viral species. The virome diversity (alpha diversity indices and beta diversity) was based on the abundance of virome species-level using the vegan package in R. The core, common, and unique viral species were defined according to the species prevalence following the below criteria: (1) core species: viral species found in >50% of the samples; (2) common: viral species found 20–50% of the samples; (3) unique species: viral species found in <20% of all the samples.
Microbiota taxonomic profiling
The taxonomy assignment for bacteria genomes was performed on assembled contigs using k-mer-based Kraken2 against the NCBI Reference Sequence Database (RefSeq). Kraken2 was an ultrafast and highly accurate tool for metagenomic sequences classification. The abundance of each taxonomy level (species, genus, family, and phylum) was calculated and further normalized as RPKM (reads per kilobase per million reads). The microbial alpha diversity indices (species richness, Shannon index, and Simpson index) were calculated based on the relative abundance of bacteria species for each sample using the vegan package in R. For the microbial community differentiation (beta-diversity) between three different time points, the unweighted Bray-Curtis distance, was calculated using the phyloseq package in R.
The workflow of the sequencing data processing, viral contigs identification, and viral taxonomy annotation was presented in Supplementary Fig. 12.
Antibiotic resistance gene profiling
Assembled contigs were mapped to the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD)73 using the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) v5.11 with default parameters as described previously31. The abundance of the ARGs was calculated using ShortBRED (95% identity and 95% length coverage)74. The RPKM abundance of ARGs was calculated.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis and figures were performed by the R software (v4.0.3) unless otherwise stated. For microbiome diversity, the two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test or Manny–Whitney U test was used for paired and unpaired samples. Benjamini–Hochberg (FDR) was applied for multiple comparison correction. MaAsLin2 package in R was used to identify differential abundance on microbiome taxonomy level with linear model (original p value <0.05 with q values <0.05 were considered significant; formula adjusted for age, gender, treatment regimens, drug durations, raw reads with a baseline set as the reference group)75. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of beta-diversity of gut microbiota between or within treatment groups was visualized based on chi-square distance matrices. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was then performed to compare microbiota community dissimilarity using analysis of variance using distance matrices (ADONIS) for 999 permutations. For the comparisons of the average Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distance, permutation tests (99,999 times) were used. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to evaluate the association between bacteriophage-bacteria taxa, Benjamini–Hochberg correction with cut-off value 0.05 applied for all paired correlations. Pearson correlation was applied to evaluate the alpha diversity correlation between viral species and bacteria species.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the colleagues in the Centre for PanorOmic Sciences (CPOS) of the University of Hong Kong for stool sample processing, performance of metagenomic sequencing and basic bioinformatics support. This work was supported by a donation from the Hong Kong Jockey Club to the Jockey Club Centre for Clinical Innovation and Discovery of the University of Hong Kong. The funder did not participate in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data.
Author contributions
L.L.W. and W.K.L. conceived and designed the study. K.S.L. contributed to the samples collection and processing. S.Y.L. provided the infrastructure for and supervised the metagenomic sequencing. H.B.Y., D.C.M., and L.L.W. implemented the bioinformatics pipeline of this virome study. L.L.W. performed bioinformatics analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. J.W.K.H. supervised the bioinformatics analysis and edited the manuscript. W.K.L. critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The dataset supporting this article is available in the NCBI Sequencing Read Archive under BioProject ID: PRJNA749138. Other public databases used included CARD (https://card.mcmaster.ca/), BUSCO (https://busco.ezlab.org/), and NCBI virus/bacteria/refseq (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/).
Code availability
Scripts used for the bioinformatic analysis can be found at: https://github.com/hbyaoherbert/ARG_Virus.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-37975-y.
References
- 1.Hooi JKY, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:420–429. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moss SF. ACG clinical guideline: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017;112:212–239. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cornejo-Pareja I, et al. H. pylori eradication treatment alters gut microbiota and GLP-1 secretion in humans. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:451. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liou JM, et al. Long-term changes of gut microbiota, antibiotic resistance, and metabolic parameters after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019;19:1109–1120. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30272-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Subramanian S, et al. Cultivating healthy growth and nutrition through the gut microbiota. Cell. 2015;161:36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhao L, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359:1151–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.aao5774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marchesi JR, et al. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut. 2016;65:330–339. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.He C, et al. The eradication of Helicobacter pylori restores rather than disturbs the gastrointestinal microbiota in asymptomatic young adults. Helicobacter. 2019;24:e12590. doi: 10.1111/hel.12590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Adak A, Khan MR. An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019;76:473–493. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2943-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen L, et al. The impact of Helicobacter pylori infection, eradication therapy and probiotic supplementation on gut microenvironment homeostasis: an open-label, randomized clinical trial. EBioMedicine. 2018;35:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Martín-Núñez GM, et al. H. pylori eradication with antibiotic treatment causes changes in glucose homeostasis related to modifications in the gut microbiota. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gregory AC, et al. The gut virome database reveals age-dependent patterns of virome diversity in the human gut. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:724–740.e728. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Beller L, Matthijnssens J. What is (not) known about the dynamics of the human gut virome in health and disease. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2019;37:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2019.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shkoporov AN, et al. The human gut virome is highly diverse, stable, and individual specific. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:527–541.e525. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chibani CM, et al. A catalogue of 1167 genomes from the human gut archaeome. Nat. Microbiol. 2022;7:48–61. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01020-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hyman P, Abedon ST. Bacteriophage host range and bacterial resistance. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;70:217–248. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(10)70007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:423–435. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rasmussen TS, et al. Faecal virome transplantation decreases symptoms of type 2 diabetes and obesity in a murine model. Gut. 2020;69:2122–2130. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Coughlan S, et al. The gut virome in Irritable Bowel Syndrome differs from that of controls. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1–15. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1887719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lang S, et al. Intestinal virome signature associated with severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:1839–1852. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cao Z, et al. The gut virome: a new microbiome component in health and disease. EBioMedicine. 2022;81:104113. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zuo T, et al. Gut mucosal virome alterations in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2019;68:1169–1179. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Scanlan PD. Bacteria–bacteriophage coevolution in the human gut: implications for microbial diversity and functionality. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:614–623. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaelin EA, et al. Longitudinal gut virome analysis identifies specific viral signatures that precede necrotizing enterocolitis onset in preterm infants. Nat. Microbiol. 2022;7:653–662. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01096-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Camarillo-Guerrero LF, Almeida A, Rangel-Pineros G, Finn RD, Lawley TD. Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. Cell. 2021;184:1098–1109.e1099. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Paez-Espino D, et al. IMG/VR: a database of cultured and uncultured DNA viruses and retroviruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D457–d465. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dutilh BE, et al. A highly abundant bacteriophage discovered in the unknown sequences of human faecal metagenomes. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4498. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Clooney AG, et al. Whole-virome analysis sheds light on viral dark matter in inflammatory Bowel disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:764–778.e765. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li H, et al. The altered gut virome community in rhesus monkeys is correlated with the gut bacterial microbiome and associated metabolites. Virol. J. 2019;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1211-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang L. et al. Dynamic changes in antibiotic resistance genes and gut microbiota after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies. Helicobacter27, e12871 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Breitbart M, et al. Viral diversity and dynamics in an infant gut. Res. Microbiol. 2008;159:367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Minot S, et al. Rapid evolution of the human gut virome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:12450–12455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300833110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhao G, et al. Intestinal virome changes precede autoimmunity in type I diabetes-susceptible children. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E6166–e6175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706359114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nakatsu G, et al. Alterations in enteric virome are associated with colorectal cancer and survival outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:529–541.e525. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Debelius J, et al. Tiny microbes, enormous impacts: what matters in gut microbiome studies? Genome Biol. 2016;17:217. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1086-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Torres-Barceló, C., Gurney, J., Gougat-Barberá, C., Vasse, M. & Hochberg, M. E. Transient negative effects of antibiotics on phages do not jeopardise the advantages of combination therapies. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.94, fiy107 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Allen HK, et al. Antibiotics in feed induce prophages in swine fecal microbiomes. mBio. 2011;2:e00260–11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00260-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Comeau AM, Tétart F, Trojet SN, Prère MF, Krisch HM. Phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS): beta-lactam and quinolone antibiotics stimulate virulent phage growth. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kang DW, et al. Microbiota transfer therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open-label study. Microbiome. 2017;5:10. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0225-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gogokhia L, et al. Expansion of bacteriophages is linked to aggravated intestinal inflammation and colitis. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:285–299.e288. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ott SJ, et al. Efficacy of sterile fecal filtrate transfer for treating patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:799–811.e797. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bull JJ, et al. Phage-bacterial dynamics with spatial structure: self organization around phage sinks can promote increased cell densities. Antibiotics. 2018;7:8. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hall AR, Scanlan PD, Morgan AD, Buckling A. Host-parasite coevolutionary arms races give way to fluctuating selection. Ecol. Lett. 2011;14:635–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01624.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Arias-Sánchez FI, Hall AR. Effects of antibiotic resistance alleles on bacterial evolutionary responses to viral parasites. Biol. Lett. 2016;12:20160064. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Feng B, et al. An atlas of the blood virome in healthy individuals. Virus Res. 2023;323:199004. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2022.199004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Borodovich T, Shkoporov AN, Ross RP, Hill C. Phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer and its implications for the human gut microbiome. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2022;10:goac012. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goac012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kyrillos A, Arora G, Murray B, Rosenwald AG. The presence of phage orthologous genes in Helicobacter pylori correlates with the presence of the virulence factors CagA and VacA. Helicobacter. 2016;21:226–233. doi: 10.1111/hel.12282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brown-Jaque M, Calero-Cáceres W, Muniesa M. Transfer of antibiotic-resistance genes via phage-related mobile elements. Plasmid. 2015;79:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Benveniste R, Davies J. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1973;42:471–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.42.070173.002351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mégraud F. H pylori antibiotic resistance: prevalence, importance, and advances in testing. Gut. 2004;53:1374–1384. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.022111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Happel AU, et al. Presence and persistence of putative lytic and temperate bacteriophages in vaginal metagenomes from South African adolescents. Viruses. 2021;13:2341. doi: 10.3390/v13122341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Enault F, et al. Phages rarely encode antibiotic resistance genes: a cautionary tale for virome analyses. ISME J. 2017;11:237–247. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lehours P, et al. Genome sequencing reveals a phage in Helicobacter pylori. mBio. 2011;2:e00239–11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00239-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mucito-Varela E, et al. Complete genome sequence of Helicobacter pylori strain 29CaP isolated from a Mexican patient with gastric cancer. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e01512–e01515. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01512-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Muñoz AB, Stepanian J, Trespalacios AA, Vale FF. Bacteriophages of Helicobacter pylori. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:549084. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.549084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fischetti VA. Development of phage lysins as novel therapeutics: a historical perspective. Viruses. 2018;10:310. doi: 10.3390/v10060310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dimitrov KM, et al. A robust and cost-effective approach to sequence and analyze complete genomes of small RNA viruses. Virol. J. 2017;14:72. doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0741-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lim ES, et al. Early life dynamics of the human gut virome and bacterial microbiome in infants. Nat. Med. 2015;21:1228–1234. doi: 10.1038/nm.3950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bushnell, B. BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-aware Aligner (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), 2014).
- 61.Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Roux S, Enault F, Hurwitz BL, Sullivan MB. VirSorter: mining viral signal from microbial genomic data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e985. doi: 10.7717/peerj.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ren J, et al. Identifying viruses from metagenomic data using deep learning. Quant. Biol. 2020;8:64–77. doi: 10.1007/s40484-019-0187-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Beller L, et al. The virota and its transkingdom interactions in the healthy infant gut. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2114619119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114619119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hyatt D, et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.von Meijenfeldt FAB, Arkhipova K, Cambuy DD, Coutinho FH, Dutilh BE. Robust taxonomic classification of uncharted microbial sequences and bins with CAT and BAT. Genome Biology20, 217 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 67.Paez-Espino D, Pavlopoulos GA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. Nontargeted virus sequence discovery pipeline and virus clustering for metagenomic data. Nat. Protoc. 2017;12:1673–1682. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011;7:e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Callahan, B. & Davis, N. decontam: identify contaminants in marker-gene and metagenomics sequencing data. (2019).
- 72.Aylward FO, Moniruzzaman M. ViralRecall—a flexible command-line tool for the detection of giant virus signatures in ‘Omic Data. Viruses. 2021;13:150. doi: 10.3390/v13020150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Alcock BP, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D517–d525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kaminski J, et al. High-specificity targeted functional profiling in microbial communities with shortBRED. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015;11:e1004557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mallick H, et al. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2021;17:e1009442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The dataset supporting this article is available in the NCBI Sequencing Read Archive under BioProject ID: PRJNA749138. Other public databases used included CARD (https://card.mcmaster.ca/), BUSCO (https://busco.ezlab.org/), and NCBI virus/bacteria/refseq (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/).
Scripts used for the bioinformatic analysis can be found at: https://github.com/hbyaoherbert/ARG_Virus.