Abstract
At the neuromuscular junction, the downstream of tyrosine kinase 7 (DOK7) enhances the phosphorylation of muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) and induces clustering of acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). We identified a patient with congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) with two heteroallelic mutations in DOK7, c.653-1G>C in intron 5 and c.190G>A predicting p.G64R in the pleckstrin homology domain. iPS cells established from the patient (CMS-iPSCs) showed that c.653-1G>C caused in-frame skipping of exon 6 (120 bp) and frame-shifting activation of a cryptic splice site deleting seven nucleotides in exon 6. p.G64R reduced the expression of DOK7 to 10% of wild-type DOK7, and markedly compromised AChR clustering in transfected C2C12 myotubes. p.G64R-DOK7 made insoluble aggresomes at the juxtanuclear region in transfected C2C12 myoblasts and COS7 cells, which were co-localized with molecules in the autophagosome system. A protease inhibitor MG132 reduced the soluble fraction of p.G64R-DOK7 and enhanced the aggresome formation of p.G64R-DOK7. To match the differentiation levels between patient-derived and control induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), we corrected c.190G>A (p.G64R) by CRISPR/Cas9 to make isogenic iPSCs while retaining c.653-1G>C (CMS-iPSCsCas9). Myogenically differentiated CMS-iPSCs showed juxtanuclear aggregates of DOK7, reduced expression of endogenous DOK7 and reduced phosphorylation of endogenous MuSK. Another mutation, p.T77M, also made aggresome to a less extent compared with p.G64R in transfected COS7 cells. These results suggest that p.G64R-DOK7 makes aggresomes in cultured cells and is likely to compromise MuSK phosphorylation for AChR clustering.
Introduction
Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a heterogeneous group of rare inherited diseases characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue resulting from compromised signal transduction at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) (1). Mutations in a total of 34 genes have been reported to cause CMS (2,3). Molecules in the agrin-LRP4-MuSK-DOK7 signaling pathway are essential for the clustering of acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) at the motor endplate (4–10). Both defective and excessive phosphorylation of muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) reduces AChR clusters (11). The downstream of tyrosine kinase 7 (DOK7) enhances agrin-triggered MuSK phosphorylation (8,9). In the absence of Dok7 in mice, agrin cannot induce AChR clustering (12). Phosphorylated MuSK also recruits DOK7 and induces DOK7 phosphorylation. This positive feedback loop ensures sufficient activation of MuSK and triggers AChR clustering. DOK7 is comprised of a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, a phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain and a long unstructured C-terminal region containing a nuclear exporting signal (NES) and two tyrosine residues that can be phosphorylated. The PH domain enables the anchoring of DOK7 to the plasma membrane and the assembly of a protein complex with MuSK (13). The PTB domain contains a MuSK-binding motif (9). The integrity of the PH-PTB domains is critical for dimerizing DOK7 to facilitate MuSK phosphorylation (14). The NES domain controls the subcellular localization of DOK7. Two tyrosine residues provide binding sites for the adaptor proteins such as Crk and Crk-L (15,16), which mediate the downstream signaling pathway to induce AChR clustering at the NMJ.
DOK7 mutations account for 10–15% of CMS, and are the most common cause of limb-girdle myasthenia (8,15,17). More than 70 missense, truncation and splicing mutations have been reported in DOK7 in CMS (8,15,17,18). Mutations in DOK7 cause aberrantly small and simplified neuromuscular synapses (8). Patients with DOK7 mutations usually respond to ephedrine or salbutamol, but often worsen with cholinesterase inhibitors that are effective in most types of CMS (19,20). Twelve missense mutations in DOK7 (p.E3K, p.P31T, p.A33V, p.S45L, p.T77M, p.G109C, p.V139L, p.R158Q, p.G161R, p.G166R, p.G171D and p.G180A) have been characterized in overexpression systems in two reports (15,21). They variably reduced the phosphorylations of MuSK and AChR ß1 subunit, but none reduced the expression of DOK7. Formation of aggregates by mutant DOK7 has not been investigated to date.
Here, we characterized two mutations, c.653-1G > C and c.190G > A, in DOK7 in a patient with CMS (Fig. 1A and B). c.653-1G > C generated two aberrantly spliced transcripts in CMS-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). In transfected COS7 cells and C2C12 myoblasts/myotubes, p.G64R reduced the expression of DOK7 by forming insoluble aggregates, and compromised MuSK phosphorylation and AChR clustering. In CMS-iPSCs, p.G64R formed juxtanuclear aggregates to a less extent and reduced the expression of DOK7 and MuSK phosphorylation, which were rescued by correcting p.G64R by CRISPR/Cas9.
Results
CMS patient
A male patient, currently at age 24 years, had respiratory distress and muscle weakness at birth. He had undergone tracheotomy and was dependent on a respirator up to age 4 years. He had ptosis and limitations in eye movements, which disappeared over time, but the exact temporal profile was not recorded. At age 4 years, he started walking independently, but he showed marked day-to-day variability from being unable to walk to being able to climb 10 steps of stairs. He showed no diurnal fluctuation of muscle weakness. Currently, proximal dominant muscle weakness is observed, but the patient is able to walk independently. Repetitive nerve stimulation decreased the amplitude of compound muscle action potential to 79% of the accessory nerve, but not of the median nerve. Biopsy of biceps brachii at age 9 years showed a decrease of type IIB fibers and an increase of type IIC fibers, but no tubular aggregates. Ephedrine hydrochloride and 3, 4-diaminopyridine showed moderate effects.
Mutations in DOK7
Sanger sequencing revealed that the patient was heterozygous for two mutations in DOK7. One was c.190G > A (NM_173660.5) at position 3 473 495 (GRCh38/hg38) on chromosome 4, predicting p.G64R (NP_775931.3) in the PH domain (Fig. 1A and B). p.G64 is highly conserved across species (Fig. 1C). p.G64R was predicted to be highly pathogenic by InMeRF with a probability of 0.890 (22) (Supplementary Material, Table S1). p.G64R has an accession number of rs1246160310 in dbSNP with global minor allelic frequency (GMAF) = 0.0011% (3/266842). p.G64R was previously reported in two unrelated CMS patients without functional characterization (23). p.G64 was located at the interface between the PH and PTB domains in dimerized DOK7 (Fig. 1D and E) (14).
Another mutation was c.653-1G > C (NM_173660.5) at position 3 491 403 (GRCh38/hg38) on chromosome 4, at the 3′ end of intron 5 (Fig. 1A andB). c.653-1G > C has an accession number of rs1449351306 with GMAF = 0.006% (1/16760). c.653-1G > C was reported in another DOK7-CMS patient without functional characterization (24).
Sanger sequencing showed that the asymptomatic father and mother were heterozygous for c.653-1G > C and c.190G > A, respectively.
Activation of a cryptic 3′ splice site in DOK7 exon 6 due to c.653-1G > C at the 3′ end of intron 5
To examine the effects of c.653-1G > C on splicing, we analyzed DOK7 transcripts in CMS-iPSCs (Fig. 1). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) spanning DOK7 exon 6 (120 bp) and sequencing of cloned fragments showed two aberrantly spliced transcripts in CMS-iPSCs (Fig. 2A). One was due to skipping of exon 6, and the other was due to an activation of a cryptic splice site deleting seven nucleotides at the 5′ end of exon 6 (Fig. 2B andC). The exon 6-skipped transcript was more abundant than the 7-nt-deleted transcript.
The exon 6-skipped DOK7 transcript has an in-frame deletion lacking codons 218–257 (p.D218_G257del), where the nuclear export signal (NES) at 240–249 is located (Fig. 2D). Although p.D218_G257del-DOK7 was similarly expressed compared with WT-DOK7 in COS7 cells (Fig. 2E), disruption of the NES domain was previously reported to compromise MuSK phosphorylation and impair AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes (15,25). The 7-nt-deleted transcript (c.653_659delACCCAAG) predicts p.D218Afs*34 (Fig. 2D), the expression level of which was markedly reduced in COS7 cells (Fig. 2E). These results suggested that c.653-1G > C was likely to generate DOK7 with markedly compromised functions.
Effects of p.G64R on protein expression and AChR clustering
First, we analyzed the expression level of p.G64R-DOK7. Western blotting of transfected C2C12 myoblasts showed that p.G64R significantly reduced the expression of DOK7 (Fig. 3A). Second, we examined the binding of DOK7 to MuSK and the phosphorylation of MuSK. As C2C12 myotubes express DOK7 endogenously, we used COS7 cells that express no or negligible amounts of DOK7 and MuSK (15). p.G64R had no effect on the protein level of MuSK, but reduced the amount of MuSK co-immunoprecipitated with DOK7 in COS7 cells that were transfected with FLAG-tagged MuSK along with WT-DOK7 or p.G64R-DOK7 (Supplementary Material, Fig. S1A). Similarly, tyrosine phosphorylation of MuSK was markedly reduced in p.G64R-DOK7-transfected COS7 cells (Supplementary Material, Fig. S1A). Third, we analyzed the effects of p.G64R on AChR clustering using C2C12 myotubes. WT-DOK7 induced AChR clustering in the absence of agrin, but p.G64R-DOK7 had no essential AChR clustering activity in transfected C2C12 myotubes (Fig. 3B andC). These results suggested that p.G64R reduced the expression of DOK7, and compromised the DOK7-mediated MuSK phosphorylation and AChR clustering.
Ubiquitin inhibitor MG132 accelerates the reduction of soluble p.G64R-DOK7 through forming insoluble aggregates
We next examined whether the reduced expression of p.G64R-DOK7 was due to (i) the reduced amount of mRNA, (ii) the accelerated degradation of DOK7 [e.g. degradation by the ubiquitination proteasome system (UPS)] or (iii) the formation of detergent-insoluble aggregates. First, quantitative RT-PCR of DOK7 transfected into COS7 cells showed that WT- and p.G64R-DOK7 were similarly transcribed, and the addition of a proteasome inhibitor, MG132, had no effect on mRNA levels (Supplementary Material, Fig. S1B). Second, treatment of transfected COS7 cells with MG132 for 3 h decreased the amount of p.G64R-DOK7 (Fig. 4A) in a dose-dependent manner with an apparent half-life of 3.3 h (Supplementary Material, Fig. S1C and D). This indicated that an accelerated UPS-mediated degradation of DOK7 was not the cause of the reduced expression of p.G64R-DOK7. Third, we examined whether p.G64R form a detergent-insoluble fraction. WT-DOK7 was mostly present in the detergent-soluble fraction, whereas p.G64R-DOK7 was mostly located in the detergent-insoluble fraction (Fig. 4B). p.G64R also decreased the sum of the soluble and insoluble fractions of DOK7 (Fig. 4C). MG132 treatment increased the amount of p.G64R-DOK7 in the insoluble fraction in dose- and time-dependent manners (Fig. 4D andE). Immunostaining of DOK7 in COS7 cells expressing WT- and p.G64R-DOK7 also showed that p.G64R-DOK7 was prone to form aggregated puncta at the juxtanuclear region, whereas WT-DOK7 was diffusely dispersed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4F andG). Thus, p.G64R-DOK7 that could not be degraded by the UPS was sequestrated into the insoluble fraction, which subsequently reduced the expression of p.G64R-DOK7.
In addition to COS7 cells, we also evaluated the aggregates of p.G64R-DOK7 in transfected C2C12 myoblasts. We observed that enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-fused p.G64R-DOK7 formed aggregates at the juxtanuclear region in C2C12 myoblasts (Supplementary Material, Fig. S2). Addition of the PLC lysis buffer to transfected C2C12 myoblasts dispersed the cytoplasmic green signals of WT-DOK7-EGFP, but not of aggregates made of p.G64R-DOK7-EGFP, indicating that the aggregates were detergent-insoluble (Supplementary Material, Video).
These results suggested that the reduced expression of p.G64R-DOK7 was accounted for by the formation of abnormal aggregates at the juxtanuclear region.
Characterization of aggregates formed by p.G64R-DOK7
The UPS is primarily responsible for eliminating unfolded and misfolded proteins. When the load of UPS is overwhelmed, protein aggresomes are formed at the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) in a microtubule-dependence manner (26). We thus examined the association of the aggregates with molecules in the MTOC. Nocodazole, an inhibitor of microtubule formation, markedly reduced the formation of aggresomes of p.G64R-DOK7 in transfected COS7 cells (Fig. 5A). A microtubule component, α-tubulin (Fig. 5B) as well as the other aggresome markers (ubiquitin, parkin, P62, and HSP70) (Fig. 5C–F) were colocalized with p.G64R-DOK7 aggregates. These results suggested that p.G64R caused abnormal folding of DOK7, which made DOK7 ubiquitinated, transported to MTOC and form aggresomes at the juxtanuclear region.
Comparison of CMS-iPSCs with p.G64R and isogenic CMS-iPSCs Cas9 without p.G64R
To dissect the effect of p.G64R in patient-derived iPSCs, we established an isogenic cell line, CMS-iPSCsCas9, from CMS-iPSCs by correcting c.190A > G (p.G64R), while retaining c.653-1G > C on another allele (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3A–C). First, myogenic marker genes (MYH3 and MYOD1) and NMJ-associated genes (LRP4, DOK7, MUSK and CHRNG) were induced in myogenic differentiation of both CMS-iPSCs and CMS-iPSCsCas9 (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3D). Next, we observed that, in contrast to CMS-iPSCsCas9, endogenous DOK7 was undetectable even after immunoprecipitation (Fig. 6A), and the phosphorylation of endogenous MuSK was markedly low in myogenically differentiated CMS-iPSCs (Fig. 6B andSupplementary Material, Fig. S4A). Although the staining of endogenous DOK7 was markedly weak in myogenically differentiated CMS-iPSCs (Supplementary Material, Fig. S4B), DOK7 made aggregates at the juxtanuclear region (Fig. 6C andD). In contrast to COS7 cells, however, HSP70 was not colocalized with DOK7. Taken together, p.G64R reduced the expression of DOK7 and MuSK phosphorylation and formed aggregates at the juxtanuclear region in myogenically differentiated CMS-iPSCs.
Unavailability of two anti-DOK7 antibodies, where one was for immunoprecipitation and the other was for immunoblotting, prevented us from evaluating abnormal DOK7 originating from an allele with c.653-1G > C in CMS-iPSCs (Supplementary Material, Fig. S5 and Supplementary Material, Table S2).
Prediction and observation of aggresome formations by five missense mutations at the PH domain
As shown in Figure 1D and E, six missense mutations (p.P31T, p.A33V, p.S45L, p.G64R, p.Y71F and p.T77M) have been reported in CMS at the PH domain. Except for p.S45L that was not conserved between mouse and human (Fig. 1D), the effects of five missense mutations on protein stability and protein structure were evaluated by eight tools (Supplementary Material, Table S3a). Among the five missense mutations, ΔΔG of p.G64R, which is a hallmark of the effect on the protein instability (27,28), was ranked first or second in most tools (Supplementary Material, Table S3b). Generation of novel aggregation-prone regions (APRs) by p.G64R was also predicted (Supplementary Material, Fig. S6A and B). In addition, substantial structural changes of p.G64R, as well as p.T77M to a less extent, were predicted (Supplementary Material, Table S3c). Furthermore, p.G64R was predicted to form new interactions with other amino acids (Supplementary Material, Fig. S6C). We indeed observed that, among the five missense mutations, p.T77M also formed juxtanuclear aggresome to a less extent compared with p.G64R (Fig. 7), but the expression level of p.T77M was not reduced. Thus, the formation of aggresome is not unique to p.G64R-DOK7, and p.T77M can also disrupt DOK7 folding and form aggresome.
Discussion
We identified compound heterozygous mutations (c.653-1G > C and p.G64R) in DOK7 in a patient with CMS. DOK7-CMS is classified into limb-girdle myasthenia, but a review of 15 patients with DOK7-CMS showed the presence of ocular involvement in 11 patients (73%) (29), as we observed in our patient. The deletion of the C-terminal region of DOK7 in one or two alleles is observed in most DOK7-CMS patients, which markedly reduces the expression levels of DOK7 (18). In addition, the deletion of the C-terminal region and the disruption of the NES domain in DOK7 compromise DOK7-mediated MuSK phosphorylation and impair AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes (15,25). We also observed that the C-terminal truncated DOK7 by c.653-1G > C markedly reduced the protein expression level. In contrast to Dok7-deficient mice that showed no AChRs in the diaphragm (2,3), mice carrying the PH and PTB domains by knocking in homozygous c.1124_1127dupTGCC can form immature AChRs with small size, less number and simplified structure (30). Similarly, DOK7-CMS patients with homozygous c.1124_1127dupTGCC show severe symptoms but are not lethal (30). Therefore, lack of the C-terminal region of DOK7 largely compromises the NMJ formation, but does not nullify the effect of DOK7.
We observed that un- or mis-folded p.G64R-DOK7 caused an overload to the UPS, and unprocessed p.G64R-DOK7 made aggresomes at the MTOC. Similar activation of the autophagosome system by an overload the UPS has been repeatedly reported and is reviewed (26). Myogenically differentiated CMS-iPSCs showed that DOK7 made aggregates at the juxtanuclear region without colocalization of HPS70 and that DOK7 expression and MuSK phosphorylation were markedly reduced. CRSPR/Cas9-medited correction of p.G64R in CMS-iPSCs rescued these phenotypes. Lack of aggresomes in CMS-iPSCs was likely to be accounted for by high UPS activities in iPSCs (31–33). Alternatively, this was due to a technical constraint that iPSCs could not form mature myotubes compared with C2C12 myoblasts (34). Although aggresomes were observed in cultured cells and possibly in CMS-iPSCs, no aggregates were observed by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining of biopsied skeletal muscle at Age 9, and the disease did not progress in 15 years after the biopsy, the roles of aggresomes in the patient remain elusive.
Small molecule chaperones, cystic fibrossis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) correctors, have been successfully applied to and approved for reverting folding defects of the CFTR-ΔF508 mutant in cystic fibrosis (35–37). CFTR correctors are unique in that most small molecule chaperones were developed as competitive inhibitors, whereas CFTR correctors enhance protein folding (38). Similar small molecule chaperons may be able to correct misfolding of mutant DOK7 due to p.G64R and others.
Materials and Methods
Generation of CMS-iPSCs
CMS-iPSCs were generated from the peripheral blood monocytes of a patient. All clones were generated using episomal vectors as previously described (39,40). Control iPSCs (454E2-iPSCs) were obtained from the Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University. The established CMS-iPSCs and 454E2-iPSCs were cultured in Primate ES Cell medium (RCHEMD001, Repro CELL) supplemented with 8 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (RCHEOT003, Repro CELL) and 1× Zell Shield (13–0050, Minerva Biolabs) on mitomycin C-treated SNL feeder cells, as described previously (41). For establishment of feeder-free culture of iPSCs, feeder-dependent cultures were adapted into Essential 8 Flex medium (E8-Flex, A28585, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For passaging, the cells were treated with 1 mg/ml Collagenase IV solution (C4–28, Sigma-Aldrich) and gravity-sedimented. The cells were then suspended in E8-Flex and distributed on vitronectin-(VTN-N, A14700, Thermo Fisher Scientific) coated dishes containing E8-Flex medium with 10 μM Y-27634. For differentiation into skeletal muscle cells, doxycycline (Dox)-inducible MyoD expression vector and PBase vector were electroporated into CMS-iPSCs and 454E2-iPSCs using a NEPA21 type II electroporator (Nepa Gene) (42). The transduced cells were selected with puromycin (P8833, Sigma-Aldrich) (1 μg/ml for CMS-iPSCs or 125 ng/ml for 454E2-iPSCs) and clones showing uniformly high MYOD1 expression were selected. The gene expressions of pluripotency markers, POU5F1 (Oct3/4), SOX2, NANOG and MYC (c-myc) were detectable in undifferentiated CMS-iPSCs and 454E2-iPSCs by RT-PCR (Supplementary Material, Fig. S8A). After 8 days of myogenic differentiation, myotube-like spindle-shaped cells with multiple nuclei were observed (Supplementary Material, Fig. S8B and C). There was no significant difference in the morphology in both clones.
Generation of isogenic control CMS-iPSCsCas9
Genomic sequences of DOK7 exons 3 and 6 in CMS-iPSCs were first determined by Sanger sequencing to confirm the presence of heterozygous c.653-1G > C and c.190G > A mutations. To make isogenic control iPSCs, c.190G > A (p.G64R) in DOK7 exon 3 in CMS-iPSCs was corrected by CRISPR/Cas9 in an allele-specific manner (Supplementary Material, Fig. S9), while retaining c.653-1G > C on another allele. The guide RNA (gRNA) was designed against allele A carrying c.190G > A using CHOPCHOP (https://chopchop.cbu.uib.no/). The c.190G > A mutation was located 4 bp upstream of the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site. The sequence of an 81-nt single-strand oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) was: 5′-CCAGCGTGTGGACCAGGCCCTCGTAGGGCAGGCCGGGCTCgAGCCcGCAGATGTCCTCTAGCGTCAGGCTGCTGCGCTCCC-3′, where the complementary sequence shown in Supplementary Material, Fig. S8A is underlined. The ssODN carried c.190G to correct the mutation (lowercase letter ‘c’), as well as an artificial silent c.195G > C mutation (lowercase letter ‘g’) at the PAM site, which also introduced an Xhol restriction site. Cas9 protein (Thermo Fisher Scientific), gRNA and ssODN were introduced into iPSCs by electroporation following a previously reported protocol (43). Electroporated cells were cultured in two dishes. At 48 h after transfection, DNA was extracted from a single dish, and a PCR fragment spanning c.190G > A was digested by XhoI to confirm the presence of cells carrying the artificial silent mutation. Next, 200–400 cells were plated on a 10-cm dish for isolation of single colonies for 7–10 days. Single colonies were picked up, and further expanded in 48-well plates. Mutation-corrected cells (CMS-iPSCsCas9) were identified by an allele-specific PCR (ASP) primer, 5′-GCCTGACGCTAGAGGACATCTGCgGGgTc-3′, where ‘g’ at position −6 was for recognizing the corrected c.190G, ‘g’ at position −3 was an artificial mismatch against the target cDNA for better discrimination in ASP and ‘c’ at the 3′ end was at the artificial silent mutation at the PAM site (Supplementary Material, Table S3). For ASP-positive colonies, the top five off-target sites, which were predicted by CHOPCHOP (https://chopchop.cbu.uib.no/), were Sanger-sequenced, and no artificial mutation was observed. We confirmed that CMS-iPSCsCas9 had the expected correction (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3A), and expressed all pluripotency markers as in CMS-iPSCs (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3B). There were no significant differences in morphology during the myogenic differentiation (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3C).
Culture of CMS-iPSCs
iPSCs were cultured on a plate coated with Vitronectin (VTN-N, A14700, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in Essential-8 Medium (E8, A2858501, Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing puromycin (1 μg/ml for CMS-iPSCs or 125 ng/ml for 454E2-iPSCs) and 10 μM Y-27632 (030–24 021, Fujifilm Wako Chemicals). Cells were seeded at a density of 14 000 cells per well in a 6-well plate and passaged every 5–7 days using Accutase (A1110501, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Medium was changed every day.
For myogenic differentiation, the cells were collected with Accutase, and seeded on a plate coated with Matrigel (Corning) in E8 with puromycin and Y-27632 (Supplementary Material, Fig. S7). On the next day (differentiation Day 1), the medium was replaced with Dulbecco’s-modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F12 (11 320 033, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 5% KnockOut Serum Replacement (KSR, 10828028, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10 μM SB431542 (SB, 13031, Cayman Chemical), 2 μM dorsomorphin (Dor, 3093, R&D Systems), 0.5 mM N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, A7250, Sigma-Aldrich) and 3 μM CHIR99021 (CH, R&D Systems). At 24 additional hours (differentiation Day 2), the medium was changed to DMEM/F12 containing 5% KSR, SB, Dor, NAC and 1 μM retinoic acid (RA, R2625, Sigma-Aldrich). On differentiation Day 3, the medium was changed to DMEM/F12 with 5% KSR and 1 μg/ml Dox. On differentiation Day 4, the medium was changed to Minimum essental medium α (αMEM) (2 144 405, Nacalai Tesque) with 5% KSR, 100 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) and 1 μg/ml Dox. On differentiation Day 5, the medium was changed to the fresh αMEM. On differentiation Day 6, cells were dissociated with Accutase and seeded on Matrigel-coated plates at a density of 1.0 × 106 cells per well in a 6-well plate in αMEM, 5% KSR, 100 μM 2-ME and 1 μg/ml Dox. On differentiation Day 7, cells were added with fresh medium with the same ingredients and were cultured for additional 24 h.
Transcriptomic and immunostaining analysis of CMS-iPSCs
Splicing pattern due to the c.653-1G > A mutation was determined by Sanger sequencing of transcripts spanning DOK7 exon 6. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Material, Table S4. For immunofluorescent staining of DOK7 in CMS-iPSCs, 1.0 × 106 cells were plated on Matrigel-coated glass coverslips in each well of 6-well plate.
Analysis of AChR clustering in C2C12 myotubes transfected with wild-type and mutant DOK7
C2C12 myoblasts were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C with 5% CO2. One day before transfection, 1.0 × 105 cells were plated in each well of a collagen I-coated 6-well plate. On the following day, a plasmid encoding WT-DOK7 or p.G64R-DOK7 was transfected into C2C12 cells using lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 24 h, the medium was switched to DMEM with 2% horse serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to induce myogenic differentiation. After 5–7 days of differentiation, agrin (10 ng/ml) was added to induce AchR clustering for 18 h. To observe AchR clusters, cells were incubated with Alexa Flour 594-tagged α-bungarotoxin for 1 h. Then, cells were fixed for 10 min using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% formaldehyde. Images were captured under an Olympus XL71 fluorescence microscope. The number, size and signal intensity of AchR clusters were analyzed using Image J software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) with an automated macro (Supplementary Material, Fig. S10).
Analysis of detergent-soluble and insoluble fractions
Detergent-soluble and insoluble fractions were extracted as described previously with minor modifications (44). Briefly, cells were lysed in 60 μL PLC buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors. After rotation at 4°C for 30 min, the lysates were centrifuged for 5 min at 15 000 × g at 4°C. The supernatants were designated as detergent-soluble proteins and transferred to new tubes. The pellets containing detergent-insoluble proteins were washed with PLC buffer and dissolved in 60 μL urea buffer (2% SDS, 6 M urea and 30 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6), followed by sonication on ice for 10 s. Equal volumes of protein extraction were heated at 95°C for 5 min in 2× Laemmli buffer and analyzed by western blotting.
Statistical analysis
Values are represented by mean and SD. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test, multiple Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s posthoc test. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Genomic sequencing of the patient
Details are indicated in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Expression analysis of wild-type and mutant DOK7 in COS7 cells
Details are indicated in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Coimmunoprecipitation
Details are indicated in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Plasmid constructions
Details are indicated in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
mRNA expression analysis by reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and real-time RT-PCR
Details are indicated in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Western blotting
Details are indicated in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscope
Details are indicated in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge members at the Core Facility of Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine for their technical support.
Conflict of Interest statement. None declared.
Contributor Information
Shaochuan Zhang, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Bisei Ohkawara, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Mikako Ito, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Zhizhou Huang, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Fei Zhao, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Tomohiko Nakata, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Tomoya Takeuchi, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Hidetoshi Sakurai, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Hirofumi Komaki, Department of Pediatrics, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Masayoshi Kamon, Department of Peripheral Nervous System Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Toshiyuki Araki, Department of Peripheral Nervous System Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Kinji Ohno, Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Funding
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP22bm0804005 and JP22ek0109488), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP20H03561, JP21K06392 and JP21H04815); the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (20FC1036) and the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (2–5).
References
- 1. Engel, A.G., Shen, X.M., Selcen, D. and Sine, S.M. (2015) Congenital myasthenic syndromes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol., 14, 420–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ohno, K., Otsuka, K. and Ito, M. (2016) Roles of collagen Q in MuSK antibody-positive myasthenia gravis. Chem. Biol. Interact., 259, 266–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ramdas, S. and Beeson, D. (2021) Congenital myasthenic syndromes: where do we go from here? Neuromuscul. Disord., 31, 943–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Huze, C., Bauche, S., Richard, P., Chevessier, F., Goillot, E., Gaudon, K., Ben Ammar, A., Chaboud, A., Grosjean, I., Lecuyer, H.A.et al. (2009) Identification of an agrin mutation that causes congenital myasthenia and affects synapse function. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 85, 155–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ohkawara, B., Cabrera-Serrano, M., Nakata, T., Milone, M., Asai, N., Ito, K., Ito, M., Masuda, A., Ito, Y., Engel, A.G. and Ohno, K. (2014) LRP4 third beta-propeller domain mutations cause novel congenital myasthenia by compromising agrin-mediated MuSK signaling in a position-specific manner. Hum. Mol. Genet., 23, 1856–1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chevessier, F., Faraut, B., Ravel-Chapuis, A., Richard, P., Gaudon, K., Bauche, S., Prioleau, C., Herbst, R., Goillot, E., Ioos, C.et al. (2005) Towards the molecular elucidation of congenital myasthenic syndromes: identification of mutations in MuSK. Acta Myol., 24, 55–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Selcen, D., Ohkawara, B., Shen, X.M., McEvoy, K., Ohno, K. and Engel, A.G. (2015) Impaired synaptic development, maintenance, and neuromuscular transmission in LRP4-related myasthenia. JAMA Neurol., 72, 889–896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Beeson, D., Higuchi, O., Palace, J., Cossins, J., Spearman, H., Maxwell, S., Newsom-Davis, J., Burke, G., Fawcett, P., Motomura, M.et al. (2006) Dok-7 mutations underlie a neuromuscular junction synaptopathy. Science, 313, 1975–1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Okada, K., Inoue, A., Okada, M., Murata, Y., Kakuta, S., Jigami, T., Kubo, S., Shiraishi, H., Eguchi, K., Motomura, M.et al. (2006) The muscle protein Dok-7 is essential for neuromuscular synaptogenesis. Science, 312, 1802–1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ohno, K., Ohkawara, B. and Ito, M. (2017) Agrin-LRP4-MuSK signaling as a therapeutic target for myasthenia gravis and other neuromuscular disorders. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets, 21, 949–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rodriguez Cruz, P.M., Cossins, J., Cheung, J., Maxwell, S., Jayawant, S., Herbst, R., Waithe, D., Kornev, A.P., Palace, J. and Beeson, D. (2020) Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to mutations in MUSK suggests that the level of MuSK phosphorylation is crucial for governing synaptic structure. Hum. Mutat., 41, 619–631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Inoue, A., Setoguchi, K., Matsubara, Y., Okada, K., Sato, N., Iwakura, Y., Higuchi, O. and Yamanashi, Y. (2009) Dok-7 activates the muscle receptor kinase MuSK and shapes synapse formation. Sci. Signal., 2, ra7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Buyan, A., Kalli, A.C. and Sansom, M.S. (2016) Multiscale simulations suggest a mechanism for the association of the Dok7 PH domain with PIP-containing membranes. PLoS Comput. Biol., 12, e1005028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bergamin, E., Hallock, P.T., Burden, S.J. and Hubbard, S.R. (2010) The cytoplasmic adaptor protein Dok7 activates the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK via dimerization. Mol. Cell, 39, 100–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hamuro, J., Higuchi, O., Okada, K., Ueno, M., Iemura, S., Natsume, T., Spearman, H., Beeson, D. and Yamanashi, Y. (2008) Mutations causing DOK7 congenital myasthenia ablate functional motifs in DOK-7. J. Biol. Chem., 283, 5518–5524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hallock, P.T., Xu, C.F., Park, T.J., Neubert, T.A., Curran, T. and Burden, S.J. (2010) Dok-7 regulates neuromuscular synapse formation by recruiting Crk and Crk-L. Genes Dev., 24, 2451–2461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Muller, J.S., Mihaylova, V., Abicht, A. and Lochmuller, H. (2007) Congenital myasthenic syndromes: spotlight on genetic defects of neuromuscular transmission. Expert Rev. Mol. Med., 9, 1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Selcen, D., Milone, M., Shen, X.M., Harper, C.M., Stans, A.A., Wieben, E.D. and Engel, A.G. (2008) Dok-7 myasthenia: phenotypic and molecular genetic studies in 16 patients. Ann. Neurol., 64, 71–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Liewluck, T., Selcen, D. and Engel, A.G. (2011) Beneficial effects of albuterol in congenital endplate acetylcholinesterase deficiency and Dok-7 myasthenia. Muscle Nerve, 44, 789–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Witting, N. and Vissing, J. (2014) Pharmacologic treatment of downstream of tyrosine kinase 7 congenital myasthenic syndrome. JAMA Neurol, 71, 350–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cossins, J., Liu, W.W., Belaya, K., Maxwell, S., Oldridge, M., Lester, T., Robb, S. and Beeson, D. (2012) The spectrum of mutations that underlie the neuromuscular junction synaptopathy in DOK7 congenital myasthenic syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet., 21, 3765–3775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Takeda, J.I., Nanatsue, K., Yamagishi, R., Ito, M., Haga, N., Hirata, H., Ogi, T. and Ohno, K. (2020) InMeRF: prediction of pathogenicity of missense variants by individual modeling for each amino acid substitution. NAR Genom. Bioinform., 2, lqaa038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mihaylova, V., Scola, R.H., Gervini, B., Lorenzoni, P.J., Kay, C.K., Werneck, L.C., Stucka, R., Guergueltcheva, V., von derHagen, M., Huebner, A.et al. (2010) Molecular characterisation of congenital myasthenic syndromes in southern Brazil. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 81, 973–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Miyana, K., Ishiyama, A., Saito, Y. and Nishino, I. (2022) Tulobuterol is a potential therapeutic drug in congenital myasthenic syndrome. Pediatr. Int., 64, e15115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ueta, R., Tezuka, T., Izawa, Y., Miyoshi, S., Nagatoishi, S., Tsumoto, K. and Yamanashi, Y. (2017) The carboxyl-terminal region of Dok-7 plays a key, but not essential, role in activation of muscle-specific receptor kinase MuSK and neuromuscular synapse formation. J. Biochem., 161, 269–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Johnston, H.E. and Samant, R.S. (2021) Alternative systems for misfolded protein clearance: life beyond the proteasome. FEBS J., 288, 4464–4487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Frenz, B., Lewis, S.M., King, I., DiMaio, F., Park, H. and Song, Y. (2020) Prediction of protein mutational free energy: benchmark and sampling improvements increase classification accuracy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8, 558247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Strokach, A., Corbi-Verge, C. and Kim, P.M. (2019) Predicting changes in protein stability caused by mutation using sequence-and structure-based methods in a CAGI5 blind challenge. Hum. Mutat., 40, 1414–1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ben Ammar, A., Petit, F., Alexandri, N., Gaudon, K., Bauche, S., Rouche, A., Gras, D., Fournier, E., Koenig, J., Stojkovic, T.et al. (2010) Phenotype genotype analysis in 15 patients presenting a congenital myasthenic syndrome due to mutations in DOK7. J. Neurol., 257, 754–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Oury, J., Zhang, W., Leloup, N., Koide, A., Corrado, A.D., Ketavarapu, G., Hattori, T., Koide, S. and Burden, S.J. (2021) Mechanism of disease and therapeutic rescue of Dok7 congenital myasthenia. Nature, 595, 404–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Koyuncu, S., Saez, I., Lee, H.J., Gutierrez-Garcia, R., Pokrzywa, W., Fatima, A., Hoppe, T. and Vilchez, D. (2018) The ubiquitin ligase UBR5 suppresses proteostasis collapse in pluripotent stem cells from Huntington's disease patients. Nat. Commun., 9, 2886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Noormohammadi, A., Khodakarami, A., Gutierrez-Garcia, R., Lee, H.J., Koyuncu, S., Konig, T., Schindler, C., Saez, I., Fatima, A., Dieterich, C.et al. (2016) Somatic increase of CCT8 mimics proteostasis of human pluripotent stem cells and extends C. elegans lifespan. Nat. Commun., 7, 13649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vilchez, D., Boyer, L., Morantte, I., Lutz, M., Merkwirth, C., Joyce, D., Spencer, B., Page, L., Masliah, E., Berggren, W.T., Gage, F.H. and Dillin, A. (2012) Increased proteasome activity in human embryonic stem cells is regulated by PSMD11. Nature, 489, 304–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Iberite, F., Gruppioni, E. and Ricotti, L. (2022) Skeletal muscle differentiation of human iPSCs meets bioengineering strategies: perspectives and challenges. NPJ Regen. Med., 7, 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pettit, R.S. and Fellner, C. (2014) CFTR modulators for the treatment of cystic fibrosis. P T, 39, 500–511. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lukacs, G.L. and Verkman, A.S. (2012) CFTR: folding, misfolding and correcting the DeltaF508 conformational defect. Trends Mol. Med., 18, 81–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fiedorczuk, K. and Chen, J. (2022) Mechanism of CFTR correction by type I folding correctors. Cell, 185, 158–168e111, 158, 168.e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tran, M.L., Genisson, Y., Ballereau, S. and Dehoux, C. (2020) Second-generation pharmacological chaperones: beyond inhibitors. Molecules, 25, 3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Okita, K., Matsumura, Y., Sato, Y., Okada, A., Morizane, A., Okamoto, S., Hong, H., Nakagawa, M., Tanabe, K., Tezuka, K.et al. (2011) A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Nat. Methods, 8, 409–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Okita, K., Yamakawa, T., Matsumura, Y., Sato, Y., Amano, N., Watanabe, A., Goshima, N. and Yamanaka, S. (2013) An efficient nonviral method to generate integration-free human-induced pluripotent stem cells from cord blood and peripheral blood cells. Stem Cells, 31, 458–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K. and Yamanaka, S. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131, 861–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Uchimura, T., Otomo, J., Sato, M. and Sakurai, H. (2017) A human iPS cell myogenic differentiation system permitting high-throughput drug screening. Stem Cell Res., 25, 98–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Maurissen, T.L. and Woltjen, K. (2020) Synergistic gene editing in human iPS cells via cell cycle and DNA repair modulation. Nat. Commun., 11, 2876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Arslan, M.A., Chikina, M., Csermely, P. and Soti, C. (2012) Misfolded proteins inhibit proliferation and promote stress-induced death in SV40-transformed mammalian cells. FASEB J., 26, 766–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.