Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284521

Women empowerment through involvement in community-based health and nutrition interventions: Evidence from a qualitative study in India

Manas Ranjan Pradhan 1, Sayeed Unisa 1,*, Ramu Rawat 2, Somila Surabhi 1, Abhishek Saraswat 2, Reshmi R S 1, Vani Sethi 3
Editor: Vijayaprasad Gopichandran4
PMCID: PMC10118087  PMID: 37079532

Abstract

Women’s empowerment is fundamental for realizing unalienable human rights and is vital to sustainable development outcomes. In India, the SWABHIMAAN intervention program was an integrated multi-sectoral strategy to improve girls’ and women’s nutrition before conception, during pregnancy, and after childbirth. This study assesses the role of self-help-group (SHGs) in improving the effectiveness of community health interventions and its impact on their self-empowerment. Qualitative data gathered through in-depth interviews (IDI) with community-based SHG members involved as Nutrition Friend (Poshan Sakhi-PS) in the SWABHIMAAN program in 2018 was used for analysis. Informed consent procedures were followed, and only those who voluntarily consented to the interview were interviewed. Twenty-five IDIs of purposively selected PSs in three states (Bihar, n = 9; Chhattisgarh, n = 8; and Odisha, n = 8) were analyzed thematically, according to Braun & Clarke (2006). NVivo 12 software was used for organizing and coding data. Three central themes that emerged to explain women’s empowerment were (1) Barriers & redressal mechanisms adopted by PS, (2) PS as a change-maker, and (3) Changes in the life of PS. The study found that women perceive themselves as more empowered through involvement in the SWABHIMAN intervention program, besides improving the community’s and their households’ nutritional status. The results suggest that policies and programs on health and nutrition interventions need to involve peer women from the community, leading to more effective outcomes. Empowering women and closing gender gaps in employment/work are critical to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.

Introduction

Women’s empowerment is fundamental for realizing unalienable human rights [1] and key to effective and sustainable development outcomes [2]. Investing in women’s empowerment can unlock human potential on a transformational scale [3]. In India, the policy initiatives toward women’s empowerment are well in place, especially the involvement of women in development programs, and policy-making at the grassroots is increasingly stressed. The national policy for women’s empowerment envisages women attaining their full potential and enabling them to participate as equal partners in all spheres of life and influence social change [4]. The operational strategy includes advocacy and stakeholder partnerships involving and strengthening the grassroots level Self-Help-Group (SHG) capacities, thus, enabling women to participate in policy planning and make informed decisions and choices on social and economic development programs. The Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM) also relies on harnessing the innate capabilities of the SHG members and complements them with capacities (information, knowledge, skills, tools, finance, and collectivization) to participate in the growing economy of the country [5]. The theory of change underlying to SHGs includes access to resources (such as increased income, savings, and loan repayments), agency (such as increased autonomy, self-confidence, or self-efficacy), and achievements (such as the ability to transform choices into the desired action) [68]. Evidence suggests that gender equality and women’s empowerment are vital in stimulating social and economic development [911].

Community-based intervention components such as primary education, health education, business or entrepreneurial skills training, awareness of women’s rights, or community development training, if added to the SHG program, have a significant positive impact on the SHG members [9]. The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions is well-established [12]. Literature shows positive outcomes of peer-led community interventions on health and empowerment [13]. Moreover, group support through training is a critical factor in increasing women’s empowerment and, more specifically, improvements in self-confidence [1418]. Thus, only microfinance or livelihood components may not be sufficient to benefit SHGs in all empowerment domains. Instead, integrating SHGs with other community-based intervention programs, such as health programs, may be necessary. Some of these integrated models, in which health, livelihoods, or other activities are added to savings and credit-focused groups, are increasingly common in South Asia [14, 16]. It is thus imperative to assess the effect of interventions on the health and empowerment of the change-makers implementing community-level interventions, especially in the Indian context. This paper explores the role of SHGs in improving the effectiveness of community health interventions and its impact on their self-empowerment.

The SWABHIMAAN demonstration program was initiated as a collaborative pilot project across five blocks of three Indian states (Bihar, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha), including—women’s SHGs federated as Village Organizations (VO) under NRLM to implement village nutrition plans through cash grants. The SWABHIMAAN demonstration program is an integrated multi-sectoral strategy to improve girls’ and women’s nutrition before conception, during pregnancy, and after childbirth in selected blocks of the states mentioned above. The program entails two strategies (i) formal system strengthening to improve coverage of food security, health, nutrition, water, and sanitation services and (ii) partnering with village organizations to design, implement and monitor a multi-sector program for adolescent girls and women [19]. UNICEF India assists the three States’ Livelihood Missions in implementing the integrated strategy. In the SWABHIMAAN program, the system’s strengthening was done by coordinating the Departments of Health, Civil Supplies, Social Welfare, and Public Health Engineering, with technical and financial support from UNICEF. A reputed academic institute was the technical partner for the baseline and served as the principal agency for the impact evaluation in the midline and end-line of the program.

The SHG program under NRLM was considered untapped to reach out to adolescents and pregnant women with a unique package of reproductive, health, and nutrition messages and services. Evidence suggests that these community organizations and their federations have the potential to manage grants for improving last-mile delivery of essential nutrition services for women, provided they are enabled, supervised, and provided protection against violence and exploitation [20]. In the context of Indian public health services, the field workers are critical to improving the last-mile delivery of health services and undertaking a range of activities like community mobilization, counseling, and record-keeping, to name a few, which have primarily been considered honorary workers. In the SWABHIMAAN Program, a "Poshan Sakhi" (Nutrition friend/peer) was designated from the SHG members, trained to reach out to adolescents and pregnant women in their working area to deliver the special package of reproductive health and nutrition messages as well as services. This paper intends to qualitatively assess the role of the SWABHIMAAN intervention program (nutrition and health training and implementation) in empowering the SHG members in rural areas of three states of India. The impact evaluation was registered with the Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations [RIDIE-STUDY-ID-58261b2f46876] and the national clinical trials registry [CTRI/2016/11/007482]. The institute IRB approved this study.

Methods

Data

This study is based on the qualitative data gathered through in-depth interviews (IDI) with community-based SHG members involved as Poshan Sakhi (PS) in the SWABHIMAAN program. The data was collected during midline evaluation in 2018. The participants were selected purposively from the pool of PSs involved in the intervention. We approached 25 PSs and could interview all of them at their convenient time and place. There was no refusal as they were active partners in the implementation program. Specifically, the present study is based on 25 IDIs of PSs from three Indian States-Bihar (n = 9), Odisha (n = 8), and Chhattisgarh (n = 8). The number of participants is sufficient to draw relevant inferences as it is well above the minimum suggested number to justify data saturation [2123]. Informed consent procedures were followed, and only those who voluntarily consented to the interview were interviewed. Written consent was sought and obtained from all the participants. The interviews were audio-recorded after written consent from the respondents. Trained research interviewers performed the IDIs using a pre-tested interview guideline. All the interviews were performed in the local languages (Hindi in Bihar and Chhatisgarh, and Odiya in Odisha). The duration of IDIs ranged between 45–65 minutes. The interviewers were from the states under the study but were not from the same village as the participants to avoid bias.

Analysis

The field notes supplemented the audio-recorded IDIs to finalize the transcriptions. NVivo 12 was used for organizing and coding data. The data were analyzed thematically, according to Braun & Clarke [24]. A theme captures something important about the data concerning the research question and represents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set. Thematic analysis is a method for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data. As a method, it further interprets various aspects of the research topic [25]. We familiarized ourselves with data, generated initial codes, searched for themes, reviewed themes, defined and named themes, and produced the report. The coding process started with identifying and coding three IDIs, independently by the first and the corresponding authors. Both authors discussed the initial emerging codes and finalized the code list to ensure inter-coder reliability. Subsequently, the first author coded the data and briefed the study team about coding categories and emerging themes from time to time. The codes, categories, and themes were finalized in consultation with the study team. The relationship among emerging themes, categories, and codes was studied using memos and mind maps through an iterative process. In this study, anonymous direct quotes were used to substantiate the findings.

Profile of study participants

The average age of the 25 PSs interviewed was 29 years. Of the 25 PSs, nine had 12+ years of schooling, while the remaining had 8–10 years of schooling. All the PSs were associated with SHGs and worked for the SWABHIMAAN intervention study for two-plus years.

Results

Three central themes that emerged to explain PS’s empowerment through involvement in the intervention study were (1) Barriers & redressal mechanisms adopted by PS, with categories of family, community, and organization level barriers plus effective ways adopted to address those barriers, (2) PS as a change-maker, with categories of malnutrition and sensitizing the community on nutrition and nutritious foods, and improved reproductive health, and (3) Changes in the life of PS, with categories of nutritional knowledge and improved health, recognition in the community, and sense of independence [Fig 1].

Fig 1. Key themes emerged from the in-depth interview of the Poshan Sakhis.

Fig 1

Barriers & redressal mechanism adopted by PS

The PSs encountered various individual, family, community, and organizational level barriers while executing their responsibility [Fig 2]. The first hindrance was to convince the spouse and, for some, both the spouse and the in-laws to get involved in the intervention program. Many got the nod to engage as PS with specific riders. Mainly, they were instructed to only visit within the village and even certain areas/communities. It was also made clear that household chores must be the priority and should not be compromised at any cost. There was even an instance of a PS leaving the program due to concerns of the family.

Fig 2. Barriers & redressal mechanism adopted by Poshan Sakhis.

Fig 2

She (earlier PS) had to leave the program 4–5 months after getting the training because she had personal and family problems

(IDI 9, PS from Bihar).

Performing the dual duty as a wife/mother and PS was difficult for many PSs, reported as initial interruptions. Some felt overburdened to work as PS and perform the expected household duties.

I had got problems at our home. I have to prepare food for the family and to attend the meeting. Moreover, women come to the meeting if I call 2–3 times. Time-to-time, I have to tell them. My family members ask who will do household work for you (me) daily

(IDI 9, PS from Chhatisgarh).

We were not getting adequate time for our work. We were overburdened by lots of household work

(IDI 22, PS from Odisha).

I have to complete household chores first and then come to work. I have to call other women(didi) for the meeting and bring material from Jagdalpur

(IDI 10, PS from Chhatisgarh).

Some families were further skeptical about the meager financial incentives for the PS, at the cost of perceived negligence of family responsibilities, visiting outside the village, and participating in meetings in various places.

You (the PS) may have to visit outside the village, how much money will you get?, Who will manage the household work and children

(IDI 18, PS from Odisha).

PSs could overcome the initial concerns on the personal and family front to fulfill their interest and commitment to work as a PS. Most of the PS believed that they gradually got family support due to the in time completion of household duties and their contribution to family income besides recognition in the community. The recognition and role within the community had further cemented their decision-making ability within their household.

Earlier, I had a problem because of my young child; now, I get the support of my family and the VO for our work. Earlier, we individually worked, but now ASHA, ANM, and AWW work together.

(IDI 13, PS from Chhatisgarh).

Now, my family is supportive of my work as PS. They feel I am doing good for the village

(IDI 20, PS from Odisha).

Before, nobody asked my opinion, but now I am being consulted on healthcare decisions in the family. My husband feels I know many things about health matters

(IDI 7, PS from Bihar).

At the community level, the initial poor interest of the community, no support from Panchayat members, inter-caste equation, inability & refusal of the newlywed to visit the Anganwadi center, and financial expectations of community for participation in meetings/awareness programs were the significant hindrances encountered by the PS during the implementation of the SWABHIMAAN program.

The family does not allow the newlyweds (nayi dulhan) to go out of home or to other parts of the village (next paraa) for meetings

(IDI 11, PS from Chhatisgarh).

Distance to the Anganwadi center prevents many from attending the VHND. Moreover, as I am from a particular caste, women from other castes avoid meetings organized by me

(IDI 14, PS from Chhatisgarh).

When we go for a home visit, some women don’t talk with us properly, and we feel bad. We explain to them a lot, but they don’t understand. They don’t cooperate because they don’t get any financial help

(IDI 1, PS from Bihar).

The women’s illiteracy was further perceived to make it difficult for the PS to convince them to participate in program activities to improve their health and nutrition.

Our area is tribal, and women are not educated. They need to be oriented several times

(IDI 20, PS from Odisha).

The PSs overcame these community-level barriers through frequent visits to targeted households/women, convincing people about the importance of nutrition, and rescheduling the meeting timing and venue convenient to the community members.

As newlyweds are not allowed to come out, we go to their homes and talk to them. After convincing her in-laws, we ensure that she participates in the meeting in her paraa (part of her village). We welcome them with coconut and flowers in our meeting

(IDI 11, PS from Chhatisgarh).

There was little difficulty in doing the meetings. Women started asking for money for it. Then we made them understand that this is for you. We are giving information about your health and good food

(IDI 1, PS from Bihar).

Now, all understand the importance of the program; they cooperate well. Now ANM and ASHA are also with us, so all women understand. All come for the meetings

(IDI 12, PS from Chhatisgarh).

An organizational challenge encountered by a few PSs was the absence of senior employees in all the meetings/activities organized by the PS. It was viewed that women perceive the meeting attended by higher officials from outside to be of importance and were more likely to join it. Non-cooperation of ASHA, ANM, and AWW in the initial stages of program implementation was also a concern for many across the states. A few also raised shortages and delays in money for conducting activities under the program.

The main problem is that sometimes we do not get the proper ingredients for certain foods from the market. Sometimes, we also have a shortage of funds and run without money

(IDI 9, PS from Bihar).

However, commitment to responsibility, understanding the importance of the program for own and community health, financial incentives, and recognition in the community led the PSs to continue in the program.

I feel the program is good for people. I also get recognition in the village

(IDI 9, PS from Bihar).

When I joined Swabhimaan, I did not know that I was underweight, I attended training where I got to know about nutritious food, and now I’m normal. Because of it now, I want more and more people to understand this

(IDI 24, PS from Odisha).

PS as a change maker

PSs believed to have successfully brought a positive change in the nutrition and health of the women in the community [Fig 3]. Nutrition hygiene imparted by the PSs, the reduced gender gap in the intra-household consumption of nutritious foods, and nutrition/kitchen gardens initiated through the PS were perceived to have reduced the malnutrition situation in the community.

Fig 3. Poshan Sakhis as a change-maker in the community.

Fig 3

Almost all women are now adopting healthy behavior, we told them. Those who are malnourished also adopted it. Now slowly, they are coming out of malnourishment. Changes have happened

(IDI 2, PS from Bihar).

Before, women don’t come to Aarogya Diwas, but now they are coming. There is also a change in farming. They are also doing farming (kitchen garden) in less space. The program is going very well

(IDI 22, PS from Odisha).

A total of three women are now out of undernourishment in my catchment area, and within last six months, one woman came out of malnutrition

(IDI 3, PS from Bihar).

PSs again perceived to have significantly improved the reproductive health status of women in the community. Most PSs claimed credit for the perceived decline in child marriage and the use of modern spacing methods of contraception among newlyweds. Additionally, almost all the PSs believed they were instrumental in increased pregnancy registration, enhanced antenatal care (ANC), consumption of nutrition supplements, institutional delivery, and on-time child immunization in their areas.

Now pregnant women are going for ANC checking. They understand what is good for them. They are starting to believe in Poshan Sakhi

(IDI 22, PS from Odisha).

Now pregnant women do early registration, receive TT. Earlier, they were shy, now by the third month, they do registration. They are going for hot cooked meal earlier not. Earlier, all were not consuming iron tablets. Now they consume. Now they care for food, water, and hospital delivery

(IDI 10, PS from Chhatisgarh).

Earlier, not many women used modern methods of family planning, but now they do. Now they are getting wise

(IDI 3, PS from Bihar)

Changes in the life of PS

The involvement of SHG members, such as PSs, in the intervention program brought considerable changes in their lives [Fig 4]. It has enhanced nutritional knowledge and has improved the health-seeking behavior of the PSs.

Fig 4. Changes in the life of Poshan Sakhis.

Fig 4

There are many changes. Previously I did not know that children should be given supplementary foods, but now I know what a mother should eat and for how long. Now we understand the importance of vaccination, food, etc

(IDI 5, PS from Bihar).

I feel happy as I received training on it and got informed that my daughter is an adolescent (Kishori). Now I care for her health and give her food 3–4 times, and with varieties, I would give her one vegetable earlier. Now I prepare three-colour food. I learned to design a kitchen garden. One type of Doctor we are now. I feel happy to be in this role. I see a change in people, so I feel happy. People listen to us and change so that we see and feel happy. Someone’s life is changed, so we feel good

(IDI 11, PS from Chhatisgarh).

PSs perceived to have earned recognition and respect in the community through their work for the intervention study. This resulted in increased self-confidence of the PSs.

I am happier in my life than past. It makes me happy that people know my name and understand my work. We have to work hard, but when we get respect, it feels good

(IDI 1, PS from Bihar).

Before, I was utterly unknown about everything, but now I know everything. Before SWABHIMAAN, nobody knew us, but now everyone knows us and gives us respect

(IDI 4, PS from Bihar).

When I go somewhere, all women try to talk. It feels good to get respect from people. If anything happens, women first inform me

(IDI 3, PS from Bihar).

Earlier, I had hesitation to talk, but not now. Now I talk freely. Now even with training sir, I talk freely

(IDI 9, PS from Chhatisgarh).

Happy to say that despite the water shortage, people now have a small kitchen garden in their courtyard. Most of them are growing vegetables for their consumption. Two-to-three produce on a large scale and has promoted it like a business

(IDI 21, PS from Odisha).

It also emerged that the PSs developed a sense of independence and satisfaction. It was due to their involvement and successful execution of the responsibilities resulting in a positive change in the nutrition and health status of the community.

I was not aware of many issues before Swabhimaan. Earlier, I used to fear what to say and how to talk. Now we can talk about our thoughts and problems to others without hesitation. I feel happy to say that the villagers recognize me as I work for them. Even I give training to another didi (PS) in the next village. I feel happy to train others. I feel now that I am standing on my own feet

(IDI 9, PS from Chhatisgarh).

Empowerment of the PS

Involvement in the program has resulted in the overall empowerment of the PSs [Fig 5]. Specifically, it had worked through educational, economic, health, and extensive exposure of the PSs. These women gained knowledge and experience through the program, which helped improve the nutritional and healthcare autonomy of the PSs, resulting in improved health and nutrition for the community and their own family. They were perceived to have strengthened their self-confidence and ability to convince people of critical social issues through exposure to the community and frequent interaction with experts. The respect and recognition resulting from hard work, financial incentives, and enhanced understanding of health, nutrition, and social issues also contributed to a sense of empowerment among the PSs.

Fig 5. Mind map of women empowerment through involvement in the study.

Fig 5

Discussion

The Swabhimaan program involved the SHG women from the community as Poshan Sakhi to implement the intervention. It helped them develop as change agents who positively contributed to young girls’ and women’s health and nutrition. Enhanced knowledge of health and nutrition care, mobility and opportunity to express views, strengthened skills to communicate and motivate people, recognition in the household and community, and increased economic status have brought a clear sense of empowerment among the PSs. Earlier studies do recognize the promotion of health knowledge [26], physical mobility [27], enhancement of skills for information technology and communication [28], work participation [29], and economic independence [30] as enablers of women’s empowerment. It is also proved that employment and income sources empower women through increased domestic decision-making power [31].

The study found that the involvement of PSs as a mediator of knowledge transfer is beneficial, and particularly, the familiarity of the PSs with the community has helped achieve the desired nutritional and health outcomes. The finding confirms an earlier study that found that the peer-led intervention model improves marginalized women’s combined health and economic outcomes in India [13]. The PSs could successfully initiate kitchen gardens, which have proven beneficial for addressing malnutrition. A past study reveals the positive impacts of home gardens towards addressing food insecurity and malnutrition, besides benefits such as income and livelihood opportunities for resource-poor families [32]. Nutrient-sensitive agriculture has also been the best approach to improving children’s nutritional status [33].

Women’s empowerment has been proven to enhance dietary diversity [3436] and micronutrient deficiency among women [37], besides improving child nutrition [38]. Empowered women are better positioned to enhance food security for children by increasing household food quantity, diversity, and nutritional value. In addition to contributing to the decline in malnutrition among young girls and women in the community, PSs adopted healthy behaviors for themselves and their children, thus reducing malnutrition at home.

The study found a sense of empowerment and decision-making autonomy among PSs after their involvement in the intervention. An earlier study also reveals that empowerment is a significant determinant of healthcare decision-making and women’s physical and mental health [39]. Our study indicates higher healthcare autonomy among women, which influenced their health-seeking behavior. The result aligns with an earlier study that found a strong association between healthcare autonomy and maternal healthcare in developing countries [40]. PSs have improved communication skills, networking, self-confidence, and enhanced socioeconomic status. A past qualitative study in Uganda also reveals that participatory community intervention enhances the health and socioeconomic status of the implementing women [41]. The study highlighted the contributory role of involvement in community-level interventions in women’s empowerment, a finding with a significant policy and program implication. However, the results are based on qualitative data gathered through IDIs with a purposively selected group of women. Therefore, caution needs to be taken regarding the results’ transferability.

Conclusion

The PSs perceive themselves as more empowered through involvement in the Swabhimaan intervention program, besides improving the nutritional status of the community and their households. The results suggest that policies and programs on health and nutrition interventions need to involve peer women from the community, leading to more effective outcomes. Empowering women and closing gender gaps in employment/work are critical to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the community participants who worked in this intervention study and our respondents.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical issues. Data are available from the Swabhimaan program at IIPS, Mumbai (contact: iipsswabhimaan@iipsindia.ac.in) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

The research received grants under Programme Code & Title- Nutrition 200-Swabhimaan; Project Code & Title: 200-203-03-Swabhimaan, from UNICEF, New Delhi, India. The donor had no role in study design, data collection and analysis decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights [Internet]. 1948. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  • 2.USAID. Gender Equality and ’Women’s Empowerment 2020 Policy [Internet]. 2020. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USAID_GenderEquality_Policy_MT_WEB_single_508.pdf
  • 3.Hudson V. M., Ballif-Spanvill B., Caprioli M., & Emmett CF. Sex and world peace. Columbia University Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Government of India M of W and CD. National Policy for the empowerment of women 2016 [Internet]. 2016. https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/women empowerment poliy_Final_17May.pdf
  • 5.Government of India M of RD (MoRD). Deendayal Antyodaya Yojna- NRLM [Internet]. 2015. https://aajeevika.gov.in/en/content/welcome-deendayal-antyodaya-yojana-nrlm
  • 6.United Nations. ’Women’s Control over Economic Resources and Access to Financial Resources, including Microfinance [Internet]. 2009. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/public/WorldSurvey2009.pdf
  • 7.IFAD. Enabling the rural poor to overcome poverty [Internet]. 2004. https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39309787/eng_1.pdf/69805352-18ca-47b2-82c7-4848121337cb
  • 8.Kabeer N. Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of ’Women’s Empowerment. Dev Change [Internet]. 1999. Jul 1;30(3):435–64. Available from: doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Hoop, T, Brody, C, Tripathi, S, Vojtkova, M and Warnock, R. Economic self-help group programmes for improving ’women’s empowerment, 3ie Systematic Review Summary 11 [Internet]. 2019. https://www.3ieimpact.org/evidence-hub/publications/systematic-review-summaries/economic-self-help-group-programmes-improving
  • 10.Ahmed SM. Intimate partner violence against women: experiences from a woman-focused development programme in Matlab, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2005. Mar;23(1):95–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dalal K. Does economic empowerment protect women from intimate partner violence? J Inj Violence Res. 2011. Jan;3(1):35–44. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v3i1.76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J. The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2015;15(1):129. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2020;20(1):1766. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09884-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pitt MM, Khandker SR and Cartwright J Empowering women with micro-finance: evidence from Bangladesh [Internet]. 2006. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/503580?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Deininger Klaus & Liu Y. Economic and Social Impacts of an Innovative Self-Help Group Model in India. World Dev [Internet]. 2013;43(C):149–63. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v43y2013icp149-163.html [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Desai, Raj M.; Joshi S. Collective Action and Community Development: Evidence from Self-Help Groups in Rural India. 2012; https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15907
  • 17.Knowles GE. An examination of microfinance self-help groups and the poorest of the poor women in Tamil Nadu, India [Internet]. Queensland University of Technology; 2014. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/72998/
  • 18.Lopamudra S, SinghSuresh K, Sahu L, Qualitative SSKA. A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON ROLE OF SELF HELP GROUP IN WOMEN EMPOWERMENT IN RURAL PONDICHERRY, INDIA. In 2012.
  • 19.Sethi V, Bhanot A, Bhattacharjee S, Gope R, Sarangi D, Nath V, et al. Integrated multisectoral strategy to improve ’girls’ and ’women’s nutrition before conception, during pregnancy and after birth in India (Swabhimaan): protocol for a prospective, non-randomised controlled evaluation. BMJ Open. 2019. Nov;9(11):e031632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.UNICEF. Comprehensive Life Skills Framework: Rights based and life cycle approach to building skills for empowerment [Internet]. 2016. https://www.unicef.org/india/media/2571/file/Comprehensive-lifeskills-framework.pdf
  • 21.Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. Int J Soc Res Methodol [Internet]. 2015. Nov 2;18(6):669–84. Available from: doi: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marshall B, Cardon P, Poddar A, Fontenot R. Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research. J Comput Inf Syst [Internet]. 2013. Sep 1;54(1):11–22. Available from: doi: 10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baker, S. E. and Edwards R. How Many Qualitative Interviews are Enough? National Centre for Research Methods Review Discussion Paper [Internet]. 2012. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf
  • 24.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol [Internet]. 2006. Jan 1;3(2):77–101. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boyatzis R. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis code development. sage, thousand oaks. 1998. Jan 1; [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Porr C, Drummond J, Richter S. Health literacy as an empowerment tool for low-income mothers. Fam Community Health. 2006;29(4):328–35. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200610000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Murshid N, Ball A. Examining ’women’s physical mobility and microfinance participation in Bangladesh: Results from a nationally representative sample. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2018. Jul 1;69:33–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharf BF. Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. Women Health. 1997;26(1):65–84. doi: 10.1300/J013v26n01_05 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar S, Kuncharam SR. Determinants of Women Empowerment Responsible for Reducing Crime Against Women in India. Violence Gend [Internet]. 2020. Aug 20;7(4):182–7. Available from: doi: 10.1089/vio.2020.0023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ahmed S, Creanga AA, Gillespie DG, Tsui AO. Economic Status, Education and Empowerment: Implications for Maternal Health Service Utilization in Developing Countries. PLoS One [Internet]. 2010. Jun 23;5(6):e11190. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Banerjee S, Alok S, George B. Determinants of Women Empowerment as Measured by Domestic Decision-Making: Perspective from a Developing Economy. In: Barnett WA, Sergi BS, editors. Advanced Issues in the Economics of Emerging Markets [Internet]. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2020. p. 1–12. (International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics; vol. 27).
  • 32.Galhena DH, Freed R, Maredia KM. Home gardens: a promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agric Food Secur [Internet]. 2013;2(1):8. Available from: doi: 10.1186/2048-7010-2-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dey D, Jana A, Pradhan MR. Influence of agriculture on child nutrition through child feeding practices in India: A district-level analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021. Dec 16;16(12):e0261237. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Galiè A, Teufel N, Girard AW, Baltenweck I, Dominguez-Salas P, Price MJ, et al. ’Women’s empowerment, food security and nutrition of pastoral communities in Tanzania. Glob Food Sec [Internet]. 2019;23:125–34. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912417301219 [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kassie M, Fisher M, Muricho G, Diiro G. ’Women’s empowerment boosts the gains in dietary diversity from agricultural technology adoption in rural Kenya. Food Policy [Internet]. 2020;95:101957. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919220301615 [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gupta S, Vemireddy V, Pingali PL. Nutritional outcomes of empowerment and market integration for women in rural India. Food Secur [Internet]. 2019;11(6):1243–56. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s12571-019-00978-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gupta S, Pingali P, Pinstrup-Andersen P. ’Women’s empowerment and nutrition status: The case of iron deficiency in India. Food Policy [Internet]. 2019;88:101763. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919219305858 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Onah MN. ’Women’s empowerment and child nutrition in South-Central Asia; how important is socioeconomic status? SSM—Popul Heal [Internet]. 2021;13:100718. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827320303554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roy K, Chaudhuri A. Influence of socioeconomic status, wealth and financial empowerment on gender differences in health and healthcare utilization in later life: evidence from India. Soc Sci Med. 2008. May;66(9):1951–62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sohn M, Jung M. Effects of Empowerment and Media Use by Women of Childbearing Age on Maternal Health Care Utilization in Developing Countries of Southeast Asia. Int J Heal Serv [Internet]. 2019. Aug 15;50(1):32–43. Available from: doi: 10.1177/0020731419867532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Belaid L, Ochola E, Bayo P, Alii GW, Ogwang M, Greco D, et al. Exploring the impact of a community participatory intervention on ’women’s capability: a qualitative study in Gulu Northern Uganda. BMC Womens Health [Internet]. 2021;21(1):28. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01170-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran

14 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-25775Women empowerment through involvement in community-based health and nutrition interventions: Evidences from a qualitative study in IndiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Unisa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Thank you for submitting this important manuscript. Please find attached a peer review comments. Please work on this, revise and resubmit. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 31 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: General comments: This is an important topic reflecting on community participation of women from SHGs and its impact on their empowerment. The three themes derived from the data are presented well however, as this paper primarily focuses on empowerment of SHGs, the barriers at personal and professional front could have been probed more in terms of:

1. Challenges at the level of family: Family member’s positive or negative attitude towards their job (especially of the spouse and in-laws ), how it influences their work? and how do they overcome such challenges? Does the recognition and role within community, has empowered their decision making ability within their household? (As decision making ability within household is an important indicator of women empowerment). Insight on such aspects will shed more light on the crucial role of family in women empowerment.

2. Challenges at the organization level: - Factors like hierarchical support/conflicts/discrimination, issues related to delay in incentive dispersal (This is a common issue faced by HCWs) and what motivates them to continue their work despite such challenges, if any.

Some minor comments:

The data collection method has been presented well except for few points that needs modification or further information needs to be added to make it more streamlined with qualitative study guidelines:

1. Line 154-156: Coding of data requires two or more independent researchers ensuring Intercoder Reliability (ICR), kindly provide the information on number of researchers involved in coding apart from the primary author.

2. The number of respondents who were approached, how many refused to participate and reason for refusal.

3. Was the transcript shared with the participants for comments or correction?

4. Duration of IDIs

Line 94-95: “This paper attempts to examine the impact on the implementors and their role in implementing the intervention in enhancing empowerment”:

This line could be modified as it confuses whose empowerment authors are referring to, SHGs or community? Since, the participants are only PSs (Poshan Sakhis) it would be better to put the rationale in their terms.

Suggestion: “ This paper explores the role of SHGs in improving the effectiveness of community health interventions and its impact on their self empowerment.

Line 248: “registration, enhanced antenatal care (ANC), consumption of IFA tablets/syrup”

Suggestion: Kindly mention consumption of nutrition supplements or mention the full range of supplements given i.e IFA, Calcium and Albendazole tablets.

Overall the paper provides a good insight on the role of PSs in community health intervention and how it is beneficial for their personal growth. If the authors can respond to the above queries, then this paper may be considered for publication.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Isha Sinha

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284521.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Mar 2023

Response to review and editor comments

Comments Response

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

R- The revised manuscript follows the suggested style requirements

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

R-The method section includes additional details regarding type of participant consent.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

R-The research received grants under Programme Code & Title- Nutrition 200-Swabhimaan; Project Code & Title: 200-203-03-Swabhimaan, from UNICEF, New Delhi, India. The aforementioned grant number is provided in the Funding information Section in the cover letter and online financial disclosure section.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

R- The revised manuscript contains the following data availability statements.

“Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical issues. Data are available from the Swabhimaan program at IIPS, Mumbai (contact: iipsswabhimaan@iipsindia.ac.in) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data”.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

R-The reference list has been checked and found to be complete and correct.

Reviewer 1

Reviewer #1: General comments: This is an important topic reflecting on community participation of women from SHGs and its impact on their empowerment.

The three themes derived from the data are presented well however, as this paper primarily focuses on empowerment of SHGs, the barriers at personal and professional front could have been probed more in terms of:

1. Challenges at the level of family: Family member’s positive or negative attitude towards their job (especially of the spouse and in-laws ), how it influences their work? and how do they overcome such challenges? Does the recognition and role within community, has empowered their decision making ability within their household? (As decision making ability within household is an important indicator of women empowerment). Insight on such aspects will shed more light on the crucial role of family in women empowerment.

2. Challenges at the organization level: - Factors like hierarchical support/conflicts/discrimination, issues related to delay in incentive dispersal (This is a common issue faced by HCWs) and what motivates them to continue their work despite such challenges, if any.

R-Thank you for reviewing the paper and the valuable comments to enhance its quality. As appreciated, efforts were made to present the three emerging themes from the data. Nevertheless, in view of the suggestions, we have made revised the manuscript highlighting the barriers at personal and professional front.

Some minor comments:

The data collection method has been presented well except for few points that needs modification or further information needs to be added to make it more streamlined with qualitative study guidelines:

R-As suggested, we have done required changes to make data collection method more streamlined

1. Line 154-156: Coding of data requires two or more independent researchers ensuring Intercoder Reliability (ICR), kindly provide the information on number of researchers involved in coding apart from the primary author.

R-Both the first and the corresponding author were involved in initial coding of 3 IDIs. The codes were discussed at length and a comprehensive code list was prepared in consensus, to ensure ICR. Specifically, the following sentences are added in the revised manuscript.

“The coding process started with identification and coding of three IDIs, independently by the first and the corresponding author. To ensure, inter-coder reliability, both the authors discussed the initial emerging codes and finalized the code list. Subsequently, the first author coded the data and briefed the study team about coding categories and the emerging themes from time to time.”

2. The number of respondents who were approached, how many refused to participate and reason for refusal.

R-We could interview all the chosen respondents. Specifically, the following sentences are added in the revised manuscript. “We approached 25 PSs and could interview all of them at their convenient time and place. There was no refusal as they were active partners in the implementation program. Specifically, the present study is based on 25 IDIs of PSs from three Indian States-Bihar (n=9), Odisha (n=8), and Chhattisgarh (n=8)”.

3. Was the transcript shared with the participants for comments or correction?

R- Individual respondents were briefed on the points raised/told by them to avoid any misunderstanding/assessment by the interviewer. However, the transcripts which were prepared after the interviews were not shared with them.

4. Duration of IDIs

R- The duration of IDIs ranges between 45- 65 minutes.

Line 94-95: “This paper attempts to examine the impact on the implementors and their role in implementing the intervention in enhancing empowerment”:

This line could be modified as it confuses whose empowerment authors are referring to, SHGs or community? Since, the participants are only PSs (Poshan Sakhis) it would be better to put the rationale in their terms.

Suggestion: “ This paper explores the role of SHGs in improving the effectiveness of community health interventions and its impact on their self-empowerment.

R- Appreciate the suggestion. We have modified the sentence as suggested.

Line 248: “registration, enhanced antenatal care (ANC), consumption of IFA tablets/syrup”

Suggestion: Kindly mention consumption of nutrition supplements or mention the full range of supplements given i.e IFA, Calcium and Albendazole tablets.

R- As suggested, we have modified the sentence

Overall the paper provides a good insight on the role of PSs in community health intervention and how it is beneficial for their personal growth. If the authors can respond to the above queries, then this paper may be considered for publication.

R- Thank you for appreciating the contribution of this paper. We have incorporated all the comments of the reviewer in the revised manuscript to be considered for publication.

Thank you

Attachment

Submitted filename: R1_Response to reviewer and editor comments_24032023.docx

Decision Letter 1

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran

3 Apr 2023

Women empowerment through involvement in community-based health and nutrition interventions: Evidence from a qualitative study in India

PONE-D-22-25775R1

Dear Dr. Unisa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran

11 Apr 2023

PONE-D-22-25775R1

Women empowerment through involvement in community-based health and nutrition interventions: Evidence from a qualitative study in India

Dear Dr. Unisa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Vijayaprasad Gopichandran

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: R1_Response to reviewer and editor comments_24032023.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical issues. Data are available from the Swabhimaan program at IIPS, Mumbai (contact: iipsswabhimaan@iipsindia.ac.in) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES