Abstract
Purpose
Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is a factor of poor prognosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Direct in-vivo visualization of fibroblast activation as early readout of MF has not been feasible to date. Here, we characterize 68Gallium-labeled-Fibroblast-Activation-Inhibitor-04 ([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04)-PET-CT as a diagnostic tool in SSc-related MF.
Methods
In this proof-of-concept trial, six SSc patients with and eight without MF of the EUSTAR cohort Erlangen underwent [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-PET-CT and cardiac MRI (cMRI) and clinical and serologic investigations just before baseline and during follow-up between January 2020 and December 2020. Myocardial biopsy was performed as clinically indicated.
Results
[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 tracer uptake was increased in SSc-related MF with higher uptake in SSc patients with arrhythmias, elevated serum-NT-pro-BNP, and increased late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cMRI. Histologically, myocardial biopsies from cMRI- and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-positive regions confirmed the accumulation of FAP+ fibroblasts surrounded by collagen deposits. We observed similar but not equal spatial distributions of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake and quantitative cMRI-based techniques. Using sequential [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-PET-CTs, we observed dynamic changes of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake associated with changes in the activity of SSc-related MF, while cMRI parameters remained stable after regression of molecular activity and rather indicated tissue damage.
Conclusions
We present first in-human evidence that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake visualizes fibroblast activation in SSc-related MF and may be a diagnostic option to monitor cardiac fibroblast activity in situ.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-06081-4.
Keywords: Myocardial fibrosis, Systemic sclerosis, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-PET-CT, Cardiac MRI
Introduction
Myocardial fibrosis occurs in response to a variety of triggers and in systemic diseases. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a prototypical fibrosing disorder with a high case-related mortality[1, 2]. Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is a factor of poor prognosis and a major cause of SSc-related deaths[3, 4]. Early vascular lesions with repetitive impairment of the myocardial microcirculation are thought to trigger diffuse MF [5]. Histologically, MF is characterized by the accumulation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts [5]; the latter express alpha-smooth-muscle actin (αSMA) and secrete abundant collagen [6]. Moreover, fibroblast activation prompts the upregulation of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) [7, 8]. Exaggerated fibroblast activation results in progressive accumulation of collagen and disrupts the myocardial tissue structure. Consequently, alterations of the conduction system occur, and cardiac contractility is impaired [9]. The diagnosis and management of patients with SSc-related MF is challenging: Current diagnostics to screen SSc patients for MF including echocardiography, electrocardiogram (ECG), and serum levels of N-terminal-probrain-natriuretic-peptide (Nt-pro-BNP) are not specific for MF and not sensitive for early changes [3, 9, 10]. Endomyocardial biopsy carries an interventional risk and the risk of sampling bias [11]. Cardiac MRI (cMRI) is considered the gold standard for non-invasive diagnostics of MF [9, 11]; however, current imaging techniques including cMRI predominately monitor the accrual of fibrotic tissue damage rather than the activity of the fibrotic remodeling process. The direct, noninvasive monitoring of the current molecular activity of fibrotic remodeling in the heart has not been feasible so far.
Radiolabeled quinoline-based FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) that selectively bind FAP have recently been developed as PET tracers. The expression of FAP on cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is well described, and the first in-human studies demonstrated increased FAPI uptake specifically in the tumor stroma of different malignancies [12–15]. Moreover, FAPI uptake has been characterized in autoimmune diseases including SSc-related pulmonary fibrosis [16], IgG4-related disease [17], and rheumatoid arthritis [18] in alternatively: in pilot studies. Moreover, increased myocardial uptake of a FAP targeting tracer in response to myocardial infarction has recently been described in murine models [19].
Here, we tested the hypotheses that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake can differentiate SSc patients with MF from SSc patients without MF, that increased [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake is associated with unfavorable prognostic factors in SSc-MF and that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake assesses current molecular fibroblast activity rather than accumulating disease damage.
Materials and methods
The materials and methods are described in the supplementary material.
Results
Accumulation of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in myocardial fibrosis in SSc patients
The baseline characteristics of all participants are shown in supplementary table 2. First, we compared myocardial [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake as determined by tissue to background ratio (TBR), mean and maximal standardized uptake value (SUV mean and SUV max), metabolically active volume (MAV), and total lesion FAPI (TL-FAPI) in SSc patients with MF (SSc-MF group) to SSc patients without MF (SSc-noMF group) and to nondiseased controls (Fig. 1A, B): [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake was significantly increased in the SSc-MF group compared to the SSc-noMF group and to controls (Fig. 1B). Subanalyses revealed that SSc patients without myocardial involvement on cMRI also showed numerically higher TBR and SUV mean values compared to non-SSc controls, suggesting an increased basal activation level of myocardial fibroblasts in SSc (Fig. 1B, C). The distribution of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake in the SSc-MF patients was diffuse (Fig. 1C, supplementary Fig. 2) and did not correspond to the coronary artery supply areas.
Cardiac arrhythmias and elevated serum NT-pro-BNP levels are associated with an unfavorable prognosis in SSc [3, 4, 20]. We observed increased [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake values in patients with ECG-abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmias (Fig. 1D). We also observed increased [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake in patients with elevated Nt-pro-BNP values (supplementary Fig. 3).
Accumulation of FAP+ fibroblasts and collagen in myocardial tissue sections from myocardial areas with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake
Next, we correlated the imaging findings of cMRI and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-PET/CT with histological findings by analyzing SSc-MF myocardial biopsy samples taken from myocardial regions with increased [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake and LGE in an SSc-MF patient. Therefore, image-guided collection of myocardial biopsies was performed. Myocardial biopsies of two heart-transplanted patients with healthy donor hearts were analyzed as controls. To analyze both the deposition of collagen and the number of activated fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, we performed sirius red staining and immunofluorescence staining of the pan-fibroblast marker prolyl-4-hydroxylase β(P4Hβ), αSMA, and FAP in consecutive tissue sections. We observed pronounced interstitial collagen deposition in SSc-MF compared to controls (Fig. 2). We observed higher numbers of fibroblasts (P4Hβ+ cells) and in particular accumulation of myofibroblasts (αSMA+; P4Hβ+) in the SSc-MF patient compared to controls. Of note, two thirds of myofibroblasts in SSc-MF stained positive for FAP.
Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake with cMRI-based imaging and clinical parameters at baseline and follow-up
We mapped the intensity of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake (SUVmean) to the 17 regions described by the American Heart Association (AHA) and compared them to LGE and T1-mapping, respectively. Although the spatial distribution of enhanced T1-relaxation times, LGE, and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake overlapped in certain areas, they differed in others, suggesting that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-PET-CT and cMRI visualize different aspects of the disease process (supplementary Figs. 4 and 5).
To further confirm that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI uptake assesses current molecular fibroblast activity, we analyzed associations of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake at baseline with changes of clinical parameters of SSc-MF on follow-up: left ventricular contractility (EF), changes of ECG morphology, and serum Nt-pro-BNP levels in all patients available for follow-up:
Early monitoring of treatment response
In participant 13, who showed high myocardial [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake at baseline, a marked reduction of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake occurred after initiation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment and this was paralleled by reduction of serum Nt-pro-BNP (Fig. 3A). In contrast, LGE and EF remained stable; T1-relaxation times showed minor changes.
Early monitoring of MF exacerbation
Participant 10 presented with inactive MF, but significant fibrotic tissue damage at baseline, as shown by the absence of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 accumulation, enhanced LGE and prolonged T1 relaxation times (Fig. 3B). On follow-up, MF became active as indicated by pronounced [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake associated with increasing serum-levels of Nt-pro-BNP, new onset of atrial fibrillation, and decreased EF.
Early diagnosis of MF
In participant 11, pronounced [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake was observed in both ventricles at baseline. At this time, cMRI did not show evidence of MF (supplementary Fig. 6A). On follow-up, the patient deteriorated clinically with declines in EF and increases in serum NT-pro-BNP. Myocardial biopsy (right ventricle) confirmed MF.
Imaging patterns in patients with stable disease
Participant 14 showed MF on cMRI at baseline and mild [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake, consistent with low molecular activity. On follow-up, MF remained stable on cMRI and clinical parameters had improved. All follow-up investigations are visualized in Fig. 3 and supplementary Fig. 6.
Discussion
Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of directly detecting myocardial fibroblast activation in SSc-related MF on the molecular level in vivo. As proof-of-principle, we show that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 tracer uptake histologically corresponds to myocardial regions with accumulation of FAP+ myofibroblasts. Moreover, we observed that changes of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake between baseline and follow-up paralleled the changes of clinical parameters. Consistent with the pathophysiology of SSc-related MF, the distribution of myocardial [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake is diffused. While [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake directly visualizes activated fibroblasts, quantitative cMRI-based techniques reflect changes in the extracellular space and thus represent accrual of fibrotic damage rather than current activity. This observation is also supported by the different dynamics of change of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake and cMRI-based mapping techniques on follow-up.
Previous studies characterized FAPI uptake in other fibrotic organ changes such as the lung: In a proof-of-concept study, we recently demonstrated increased pulmonary [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake in patients with SSc-related interstitial lung disease at risk of progression and that increased [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake at baseline is associated with the deterioration of lung function on follow-up [16]. Other studies characterized the role of FAPI-PET CT in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [21, 22]. As limitation of this study, the patient number is too small to apply advanced statistical models for the analysis of the association of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake with the course of myocardial fibrosis. This is due to the situation that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-PET-CT is a novel imaging approach and because SSc is an orphan disease with only a subset of patients developing MF. Thus, the analysis of the potential prognostic role of myocardial [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake for the course of myocardial fibrosis will be subject of larger multicenter studies with higher patient numbers and longer follow-up-times.
Another limitation of the study is that the median age between the control group (51 (44.3–54.3)) and the SSc patients groups (SSc-MF patients: 59.5 (58.0–63.3), SSc-no-MF-patients: 56.5 (47.8–67)) differed. The influence of age on myocardial [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake has not been investigated; however, an influence on the results cannot fully be excluded. Moreover, some limitations in spatial and temporal resolution in myocardial imaging are inherent to the PET-imaging technique: limited spatial resolution of the myocardial wall might result in underestimation of the myocardial activity concentration [23]. Temporal resolution is limited due to the relatively long PET measurement frame (2 min) compared to the dynamics of cardiac movements which can potentially be anticipated by cardiac and respiratory gating [23]. However, a gold standard has not been established yet. Despite these limitations, we observed the consistent [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake in patients with myocardial fibrosis and consistent parallels between FAPI uptake and the clinical disease course.
In summary, we present first evidence that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-PET-CT can visualize the current cardiac molecular fibroblast activity and might improve early assessment of treatment responses.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge iTheranotics (Dulles, VA, USA) for providing the precursor FAPI-04.
Author contribution
CT, JHWD, CS, and CB designed the study; CT, KT, SCF, A-HG, AA, A-EM, CD, MB-H, TK, OP, TB, MU, and CS acquired data; CT, JHWD, KT, TK, GS, and CB interpreted data; CT, JHWD, OP, TK, and CB prepared the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by Grants DI 1537/13–1, DI 1537/14–1, DI 1537/17–1, DI 1537/20–1, DI 1537/22–1, and BE 7036/2–1 of the German Research Foundation; SFB CRC1181 (project C01 and Z02), STB TR305 (project Z01) and SFB TR221/ project number 324392634 (B04) of the German Research Foundation; MASCARA (project 2, Distler, Kuwert); grants A64 and A79 of the IZKF in Erlangen; 4D nanoscope project; and grant 21–11-09–1-Bergmann of the ELAN-Foundation Erlangen, Clinician Scientist Program Erlangen (Bergmann).
Data Availability
All data are available upon request from the corresponding author with publication.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee. Subjects were enrolled in the study after signing the informed consent form.
Competing interests
JHWD has consultancy relationships and/or has received research funding from Actelion, BMS, Celgene, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, JB Therapeutics, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, UCB, GSK, Array Biopharma, Galapagos, Inventiva, and Active Biotech in the area of potential treatments of SSc and is stock owner of 4D Science. CB has received consultancy fees from Pfizer, Janssen, and Boehringer Ingelheim. KT has received consultancy fees and honoraria from UCB and Gilead. CS has received consultancy fees from ROTOP Pharmaka GmbH and Lilly Pharmaceuticals.
Footnotes
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiology.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jörg H. W. Distler, Koray Tascilar, Sara Chenguiti Fakhouri, Christian Schmidkonz and Christina Bergmann contributed equally, respectively.
References
- 1.Denton CP, Khanna D. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet. 2017;390(10103):1685–1699. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30933-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gabrielli A, Avvedimento EV, Krieg T. Scleroderma. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(19):1989–2003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0806188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Allanore Y, Distler O, Walker UA, Khanna D, Furst DE, Meune C. Points to consider when doing a trial primarily involving the heart. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(suppl_5):v12-v6. 10.1093/rheumatology/kex198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M, Airò P, Cozzi F, Carreira PE, et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(10):1809–1815. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.114264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meune C, Vignaux O, Kahan A, Allanore Y. Heart involvement in systemic sclerosis: evolving concept and diagnostic methodologies. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;103(1):46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(5):392–401. doi: 10.1038/nrc1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aghajanian H, Kimura T, Rurik JG, Hancock AS, Leibowitz MS, Li L, et al. Targeting cardiac fibrosis with engineered T cells. Nature. 2019;573(7774):430–433. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1546-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hoffmann DB, Fraccarollo D, Galuppo P, Frantz S, Bauersachs J, Tillmanns J. Genetic ablation of fibroblast activation protein alpha attenuates left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rangarajan V, Matiasz R, Freed BH. Cardiac complications of systemic sclerosis and management: recent progress. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017;29(6):574–584. doi: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Karamitsos TD, Arvanitaki A, Karvounis H, Neubauer S, Ferreira VM. Myocardial tissue characterization and fibrosis by imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(5):1221–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Diao KY, Yang ZG, Xu HY, Liu X, Zhang Q, Shi K, et al. Histologic validation of myocardial fibrosis measured by T1 mapping: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0313-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, et al. (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(6):801–805. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Toms J, Kogler J, Maschauer S, Daniel C, Schmidkonz C, Kuwert T, et al. Targeting fibroblast activation protein: radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluation of an (18)F-labeled FAP inhibitor. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(12):1806–1813. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.242958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dendl K, Koerber SA, Finck R, Mokoala KMG, Staudinger F, Schillings L, et al. (68)Ga-FAPI-PET/CT in patients with various gynecological malignancies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(12):4089–4100. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05378-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang D, Wu J, Zhong H, Li Y, Han Y, He Y, et al. [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the evaluation of digestive system tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bergmann C, Distler JHW, Treutlein C, Tascilar K, Müller A-T, Atzinger A, et al. 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET-CT for molecular assessment of fibroblast activation and risk evaluation in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a single-centre, pilot study. The Lancet Rheumatology. 2021;3(3):e185-e94.10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30421-5 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Schmidkonz C, Rauber S, Atzinger A, Agarwal R, Götz TI, Soare A, et al. Disentangling inflammatory from fibrotic disease activity by fibroblast activation protein imaging. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(11):1485–1491. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dorst DN, Rijpkema M, Buitinga M, Walgreen B, Helsen MMA, Brennan E, et al. Targeting of fibroblast activation protein in rheumatoid arthritis patients: imaging and ex vivo photodynamic therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022;61(7):2999–3009. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Langer LBN, Hess A, Korkmaz Z, Tillmanns J, Reffert LM, Bankstahl JP, et al. Molecular imaging of fibroblast activation protein after myocardial infarction using the novel radiotracer [(68)Ga]MHLL1. Theranostics. 2021;11(16):7755–7766. doi: 10.7150/thno.51419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vacca A, Meune C, Gordon J, Chung L, Proudman S, Assassi S, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias and conduction defects in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53(7):1172–1177. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Röhrich M, Leitz D, Glatting FM, Wefers AK, Weinheimer O, Flechsig P, et al. Fibroblast activation protein-specific PET/CT imaging in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases and lung cancer: a translational exploratory study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(1):127–133. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.261925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rosenkrans ZT, Massey CF, Bernau K, Ferreira CA, Jeffery JJ, Schulte JJ, et al. [(68) Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET for non-invasive detection of pulmonary fibrosis disease activity. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(11):3705–3716. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05814-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lassen ML, Kwiecinski J, Slomka PJ. Gating approaches in cardiac PET imaging. PET Clin. 2019;14(2):271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available upon request from the corresponding author with publication.