Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Mar 1;60(6):3379–3395. doi: 10.1007/s12035-023-03269-z

Caveolin-1-Mediated Cholesterol Accumulation Contributes to Exaggerated mGluR-Dependent Long-Term Depression and Impaired Cognition in Fmr1 Knockout Mice

Li Luo 1,#, Le Yang 1,#, Kun Zhang 1,#, Shi-Meng Zhou 2, Yan Wang 3, Liu-Kun Yang 2, Bin Feng 4, Shui-Bing Liu 2, Yu-Mei Wu 2, Ming-Gao Zhao 1, Qi Yang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC10122623  PMID: 36854997

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is one of the most common inherited mental retardation diseases and is caused by the loss of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) expression. The metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) theory of FXS states that enhanced mGluR-dependent long-term depression (LTD) due to FMRP loss is involved in aberrant synaptic plasticity and autistic-like behaviors, but little is known about the underlying molecular mechanism. Here, we found that only hippocampal mGluR-LTD was exaggerated in adolescent Fmr1 KO mice, while N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-LTD was intact in mice of all ages. This development-dependent alteration was related to the differential expression of caveolin-1 (Cav1), which is essential for caveolae formation. Knockdown of Cav1 restored the enhanced mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice. Moreover, hippocampal Cav1 expression in Fmr1 KO mice induced excessive endocytosis of the α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptor subunit GluA2. This process relied on mGluR1/5 activation rather than NMDAR. Interference with Cav1 expression reversed these changes. Furthermore, massive cholesterol accumulation contributed to redundant caveolae formation, which provided the platform for mGluR-triggered Cav1 coupling to GluA2. Importantly, injection of the cholesterol scavenger methyl-β-cyclodextrin (Mβ-CD) recovered AMPA receptor trafficking and markedly alleviated hyperactivity, hippocampus-dependent fear memory, and spatial memory defects in Fmr1 KO mice. Together, our findings elucidate the important role of Cav1 in mediating mGluR-LTD enhancement and further inducing AMPA receptor endocytosis and suggest that cholesterol depletion by Mβ-CD during caveolae formation may be a novel and safe strategy to treat FXS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12035-023-03269-z.

Keywords: Metabotropic glutamate receptor, Long-term depression, Caveolin-l, Endocytosis, Cholesterol, Fragile X syndrome

Introduction

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited neurodevelopmental disease and is characterized by intellectual disability, hyperactivity, attention deficits, and autistic-like behaviors [1]. It is caused by the full mutation of the Fmr1 gene, which is characterized by the excessive expansion of CGG trinucleotide repeats (≥ 200) in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the gene. These expanded CGG triplet repeats are hypermethylated with consequent transcriptional gene silencing, halting gene expression, thereby resulting in a reduction or absence of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) [2, 3]. With the development of Fmr1 knockout (KO) mice [4], numerous animal studies have attempted to uncover the pathology of FXS. Over the last few years, the metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) theory of FXS has gained much support [5]. The theory states that α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptor internalization, triggered by mGluR5 stimulation, is exaggerated in Fmr1 KO mice and associated with protein synthesis, accounting for the enhanced hippocampal long-term depression (LTD) [5, 6]. Although loss of FMRP leads to prolonged mGluR signaling, little is known about the developmental alterations in experience-dependent synaptic function. The molecular mechanisms underlying these changes have yet to be elucidated, but are thought to be related to the role of FMRP in mRNA transport and translation [7–10].

We previously reported that caveolin-1 (Cav1) is a targeted mRNA repressed by FMRP [11]. Cav1 is the best-characterized mediator of clathrin-independent endocytosis and can mediate rapid endocytosis [12, 13]. Within hippocampal neurons, Cav1 has been found to bind and colocalize with Group I mGluRs [14]. Research in Cav1 KO mice suggests that Cav1 is required for normal coupling of mGluR1/5 to downstream signaling cascades and induction of mGluR-LTD [15]. Due to the important role of Cav1 in cholesterol transport and homeostasis, findings suggest that altered cholesterol homeostasis may affect Cav1 expression and the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases [16]. However, the role of Cav1 regulation via cholesterol in exaggerated mGluR-LTD due to lack of FMRP is not known.

Here, we report that exaggerated mGluR-LTD in the Fmr1 KO hippocampus is development-dependent and caused by overexpressed Cav1, in accordance with the loss of FMRP. We show that under mGluR1/5 activation, Cav1 facilitates AMPA receptor endocytosis. Knockdown of excess Cav1 alleviates aberrant mGluR-LTD and AMPA receptor endocytosis. Moreover, massive cholesterol accumulation in neurons provides the structural basis for caveolae hyperfunction. Upon depletion of cellular cholesterol with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (Mβ-CD), learning and memory disorders in Fmr1 KO mice are significantly relieved. Together, these findings provide evidence for an unknown molecular mechanism of the mGluR theory in FXS and suggest that Mβ-CD may be a potential drug to treat FXS.

Materials and Methods

Animals

We used male Fmr1 KO (Stock No: 004624, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA), Fmr1 WT (Stock No: 004828, The Jackson Laboratory), and, as controls, C57BL/6 J mice for this study. The mice were housed on a 12-h light/dark cycle and provided ad libitum access to food and water. All procedures involving animals were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Fourth Military Medical University.

Drugs and Antibodies

(RS)-3,5-DHPG and dynasore were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). AP5 (D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate), MPEP, cholesterol, and methyl-β-cyclodextrin (Mβ-CD) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). We used the following antibodies: anti-FMRP (MAB2160; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), anti-Cav1 (ab2910, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-GluA1 (ab31232; Abcam), anti-GluA2 (ab20673; Abcam), anti-pan-cadherin (C1821; Sigma), anti-ERK1/2 (sc514302; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-pERK1/2 (sc81492; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-mTOR (sc517464; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-pmTOR (sc293133; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-β-actin (A5316; Sigma).

DNA Constructs and Lentiviral Vector

We obtained full-length mouse Cav1 by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT‒PCR) using the following primers: 5′-CCCTCGAGGGAAACCTCCTCAGAGCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGGAATTCAAATTTGCTGCTGCGAGA-3′ (reverse). The Cav1 cDNA was cloned into a lentiviral expression vector provided by GenePharma (Shanghai, China). To knock down Cav1, two sequences were targeted: AAGGAGATTGACCTGGTCAAC (Cav1 shRNA-1) and GCAAGATATTCAGCAACATCC (Cav1 shRNA-2). All lentiviral vectors were carried with GFP tags, and the infected cells could be identified under a fluorescence microscope. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, animals and cells were treated with varying doses of the vector (1 × 109 pfu/ml) for 5–7 days. Mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium, and Cav1 shRNA lentivirus was stereotaxically microinjected into the bilateral CA1 region of the hippocampus (2.3 mm anterior to bregma, ± 1.5 mm lateral to midline, and 1.7 mm ventral to bregma) at a rate of 0.1 µl/min for 10 min, resulting in a dose of 1 µl of lentivirus per side. One week after surgery, hippocampal slices were prepared from the animals.

Hippocampal Slice Preparation

Hippocampal slices from male WT and Fmr1 KO mice were prepared as previously described [17]. Two different age groups were used: p8-p15 and p28-p35. Slices were cut in oxygenated solution (in mM): 250 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 0.5 CaCl2, 6 MgSO4, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, and 10 D-glucose. After cutting, the slices recovered at 34 °C in aCSF (in mM) as follows: 124 NaCl, 4.4 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgSO4, 1 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, and 10 D-glucose. After 10 min, the slices were placed in aCSF at room temperature for an additional 1–2 h and gassed with 95% O2–5% CO2.

Field Electrophysiological Recordings

Briefly, individual slices were placed in an MED64 probe (MED-P515A, 8 × 8 array; interpolar distance, 150 µm) positioned on the Schaffer collateral-CA1 pathway of the dorsal hippocampus. Stable baseline responses were recorded for at least 1 h, and slices were treated with DHPG (100 μM) for 10 min or low-frequency stimulation (LFS; 900 pulses at 1 Hz for 15 min). After the wash period, mGluR-dependent LTD was induced by application of DHPG, and NMDAR-dependent LTD was induced by LFS. It has been reported that some LFS-induced LTD is also sensitive to mGluRs [18]. Therefore, the effect of LFS on inducing LTD in hippocampal slices from WT or KO mice was examined in the presence or absence of the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP (40 μM). Similarly, for mGluR-dependent LTD, NMDAR antagonist AP5 (50 μM) was applied to determine whether there was any effect on DHPG-induced LTD. Multichannel electrophysiological data were collected every 1 min, and fEPSP slopes were measured and analyzed using Mobius software (Panasonic Alpha-Med Sciences, Tokyo, Japan) [11, 19].

Input/Output Curve Plotting

To determine whether Cav1 shRNA had an effect on the baseline responses recorded from hippocampal field potentials in Fmr1 KO mice, input/output curves were plotted. The X-axis represents different stimulation intensities. The slope of the fEPSP under each stimulus intensity was measured, and I/O curves were generated.

Primary Neuronal Culture

Neuronal hippocampal cultures were prepared from embryonic 17-day-old (E17) mice and grown in neurobasal medium supplemented with B27 and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), as described previously [20]. The cultures were infected with lentivirus at 6 days in vitro (DIV) or treated with drugs at 10 DIV.

Caveolae Membrane Fraction Purification

Caveolae-enriched membrane fractions were purified by using a Caveolae/Rafts Isolation Kit (CS0750; Sigma). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, cells grown on 10-cm plates were washed in cold PBS and scraped into 1-ml lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100. Following homogenization and sonication, 0.84 ml of the suspension was adjusted to 35% OptiPrep by adding 1.16 ml of OptiPrep density gradient medium and placed at the bottom of an ultracentrifuge tube. A discontinuous gradient was generated by layering 2 ml of 30%, 25%, 20%, and 0% OptiPrep (diluted in lysis buffer) in decreasing order. The gradients were centrifuged at 200,000 × g using an SW41Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA, USA) for 4 h at 4 °C. From the top of each gradient, ten equal fractions (1 ml) were collected. A light scattering band was observed at fractions 4–5, corresponding to caveolae [21]. Each fraction was concentrated by using a Pierce® SDS‒PAGE Sample Prep Kit (No. 89888; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and analyzed by immunoblotting.

Synaptosome Preparation

Synaptosomes were prepared according to the protocol described by Zhou et al. [22]. Briefly, the homogenates of neuronal cells were diluted with a discontinuous Percoll gradient (P4937; Sigma). After centrifugation for 5 min at 33,000 × g at 4 °C, the layers between 10 and 20% Percoll were collected, washed in HEPES-buffered medium (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM NaHCO3, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) and further centrifuged at 22,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in Krebs–Ringer buffer and recentrifuged at 2000 × g for 15 min. The final pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of neuronal lysis buffer and immediately used for Western blot analysis.

Surface Biotinylation Assay

Surface AMPA receptors were detected by biotinylation assay as described previously [23]. After treatment, neurons were incubated with 1 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin (No. 21335; Thermo Scientific) in aCSF for 30 min on ice, and then the reaction was stopped by removal of the solution and incubation in 100 mM ice-cold glycine in aCSF for 20 min. After cell lysis with RIPA buffer, biotinylated surface (membrane) proteins were precipitated with 30 μl of Dynabead Biotin Binder (No. 11047; Thermo Scientific), and the residual samples were cytoplasm. Both membrane and cytosolic samples were subjected to SDS‒PAGE and probed with anti-GluA C-terminal antibodies. Pan-cadherin and β-actin were used as internal controls.

Immunoblot Analysis

Samples were separated using a 12% SDS‒PAGE gel and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked in PBS Tween-20 (1%) containing 5% BSA and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were visualized using secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and ECL reagent (GE Healthcare Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The densitometric analysis of bands was conducted using a ChemiDoc XRS (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and quantified using Quantity One version 4.1.0 (Bio-Rad).

Cholesterol Detection

The cellular lipid content was extracted from aliquots of the hippocampus or serum. Both total and free cholesterol concentrations were measured using a Cholesterol Quantitation Kit (MAK043; Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s directions [24]. Cholesterol was quantified by densitometry and comparison with cholesterol standards run on the same plate. The measurements were performed by a GloMax® Discover Multimode Microplate Reader (Promega). For cholesterol staining, hippocampal sections were labeled with filipin III, 50 μg/ml, for 2 h in the dark. To focus on the cholesterol levels in neuronal cells, permeabilized sections were also incubated with monoclonal NeuN (ab177487; Abcam) overnight at 4 °C and then with a FITC-conjugated secondary antibody for 40 min at room temperature. Images were acquired with a living cell microscopic imaging station (BioTek, Cytation 1, USA).

Behavioral Tests

Five-week-old KO mice were divided into four groups and subcutaneously injected with 125, 250, or 500 mg/kg Mβ-CD or saline twice per week for 2 weeks. Each group contained 10 mice. All mice were brought into the testing room 2 h before the tests. Behavior was assessed by an experimenter blinded to the treatment. All behavioral tests were performed during the light period on the designated days of the experiment.

Open-Field Test

Each animal was placed in the center of a Plexiglas box (30 × 30 × 30 cm3) and allowed to freely explore for 15 min. The total distance traveled and time spent in the central area were analyzed using a video-tracking system (MedAssociates, St. Albans, VT, USA).

Fear Conditioning Test

On the training day (day 1), mice were placed in a dark chamber and presented with three tone (conditioned stimulus (CS): 90 dB, 5 kHz)-shock (unconditioned stimulus (US): 2.0 s, 1.0 mA) pairings with a varying intertrial interval of 30–90 s. On day 2, the mice were re-exposed to the fear conditioning chamber for 8 min to test contextual fear recall, and freezing time was averaged across the entire session. On day 3, the mice were tested for cued fear recall. The session started with a 3-min acclimation period; then, 10 blocks of five CS were presented for 30 s each with an intertrial interval of 5 s, and freezing was recorded during each presentation. For analysis, total freezing was averaged across all CS presentations. Freezing was determined using analysis software (Med Associates, San Diego, CA, USA) [25].

Morris Water Maze Test

A circular tank (120 cm in diameter and 50 cm in height) with nontoxic tempera paint solution (maintained at 22–25 °C) was used. Visual cues were placed in the four corners for spatial orientation. All mice were trained for 4 d (60 s trial time, 4 trials each day) to find a hidden platform in the Morris water maze. One hour after the final learning trial, a single 60-s probe trial was conducted without the platform. During the experiment, the entry quadrant varied, but the platform location remained constant. The latency to enter the target area (the previous platform location), number of platform crossings, and swimming speed were calculated [26].

Statistical Analyses

The sample size was chosen based on previous publications. Based on the number of comparisons and the pattern of data distribution, appropriate statistical tests were used to analyze the data. Data analysis was conducted using Prism 8 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). The data are expressed as the means ± SEMs for at least three independent experiments. For two-group comparisons, statistical significance was determined using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Multigroup analyses were performed using one/two-way ANOVA. Significance was defined as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. P values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses for every experiment are described accordingly in the figure captions.

Results

Fmr1 KO Mice Exhibit Altered mGluR-LTD but Intact NMDAR-LTD

Based on the mGluR theory of FXS, exaggerated hippocampal mGluR-dependent LTD is a well-known characteristic in fmr1 KO mice [5, 6]. To confirm these findings, we first recorded mGluR-LTD from the CA1 area in adolescent (p28-p35) mice. By using multichannel signals through a MED64 system, we recorded fEPSP slopes in the active channels from hippocampal slices. To induce pure mGluR-LTD, slices were preincubated with NMDAR antagonist AP5 for 30 min. Then, after perfusion with the selective mGluR Group I agonist DHPG for 10 min, synaptic responses were transiently reduced. When DHPG was washed out, the normalized fEPSP slope (% baseline) during the last 30 min between WT and KO mice (p28-p35) showed no significant change in the presence or absence of AP5 (Fig. S1A, B). Next, we used DHPG to induce mGluR-LTD without AP5. After perfusion with DHPG for 10 min, synaptic responses were transiently reduced, and fEPSP slopes increased gradually in both WT and KO genotypes when DHPG was washed out. In WT mice, the normalized fEPSP slope (% baseline) of 56 channels during the last 30 min was averaged at 70.19 ± 1.62% (data from 8 slices of five mice), whereas the fEPSP slope of 63 channels in Fmr1 KO mice was reduced to 55.11 ± 1.62% (data from 9 slices from six mice; Fig. 1A). Next, we checked the effect of DHPG on mGluR-LTD in neonatal (p8-p15) mice and found no detectable difference in baseline fEPSP slopes between WT and KO hippocampal slices (WT group, 66.61 ± 1.31% of 58 channels; KO group, 68.85 ± 1.67% of 53 channels; data from 8 slices of five WT mice and 9 slices of five KO mice; Fig. 1B), which is consistent with other reports [17].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Enhanced mGluR-LTD in the adolescent Fmr1 KO hippocampus. A Induction of mGluR-LTD by bath application of DHPG (100 μM, 10 min) at age p28-p35 in WT and Fmr1 KO mice. n = 56 channels recorded from 8 slices of five WT mice, n = 63 channels recorded from 9 slices of six KO mice; ** p < 0.01 versus WT mice, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. B DHPG induced mGluR-LTD at age p8-p15 in WT and Fmr1 KO mice. n = 58 channels recorded from 8 slices of five WT mice, n = 53 channels recorded from 9 slices of five KO mice, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. C NMDAR-LTD was induced by LFS (900 pulses at 1 Hz, 15 min) at age p28-p35 in WT and Fmr1 KO mice. n = 61 channels recorded from 9 slices of five WT mice, n = 73 channels recorded from 9 slices of six KO mice, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. D LFS induced NMDAR-LTD at age p8-p15 in WT and Fmr1 KO mice. n = 55 channels recorded from 7 slices of four WT mice, n = 69 channels recorded from 9 slices of five KO mice, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Top, representative traces of 64 channels recorded at baseline (black) and 1 h after stimulation (colors). Calibration bars: 0.2 mV, 50 ms. Bottom left, normalized fEPSP slope (% baseline) of LTD from total active channels. Bottom right, summary graph of the final average fEPSP slope during the last 30 min

It has been reported that some low-frequency stimulation (LFS)-induced LTD is also sensitive to mGluRs [18]. Therefore, we first explored whether the application of the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP had an effect on LFS-induced NMDAR-LTD. The results indicated that the normalized fEPSP slope (% baseline) of hippocampal slices from WT and KO mice (p28-p35) was not distinctly altered with or without MPEP (Fig. S1C, D). Thus, we further induced NMDAR-LTD by delivering LFS to Schaffer collateral axons in p8-p15 and p28-p35 mice without MPEP involvement. When recording from the CA1 area in p28-p35 mice, the normalized fEPSP slope (% baseline) from slices of WT and KO mice was averaged at 75.80 ± 1.72% (n = 61 channels recorded from 9 slices of five mice) and 76.34 ± 1.94% (n = 73 channels recorded from 9 slices of six mice; Fig. 1C), respectively. Similarly, in slices from p8-p15 mice, we found no significant difference in fEPSP slopes between the WT and KO groups (WT mice, 73.38 ± 1.04% of 55 channels; KO mice, 74.90 ± 0.96% of 69 channels; data from 7 slices of four WT mice and 9 slices of five KO mice; Fig. 1D). These results suggest that hippocampal NMDAR-LTD is intact in Fmr1 KO mice. However, only at p28-p35 was enhanced mGluR-LTD observed in KO mice, suggesting that dysregulated mGluR activity in FXS is dependent on the specific developmental stage.

Cav1 Translation Controlled by mGluR Is Dysregulated in Fmr1 KO Mice

Studies have reported that enhanced mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice is due to exaggerated protein synthesis [5, 27]. In agreement with other studies [28], we found that FMRP levels in the mouse hippocampus were high in the first/second postnatal week and then gradually decreased (Fig. 2A). However, Cav1 expression gradually increased after birth and peaked when FMRP expression disappeared in WT mice (Fig. 2A). Previously, we demonstrated that FMRP interacted directly with Cav1 mRNA [11]. Therefore, FMRP negatively regulates the translation of Cav1 during development. Furthermore, elevated Cav1 expression was observed only at 5 weeks in the KO hippocampus, while no difference was observed between WT and KO mice at 2 weeks (Fig. 2B). Similar results were observed in hippocampal synaptosomes (Fig. 2C). Thus, it can be seen that the age of the exaggerated enhancement of mGluR-LTD in the KO hippocampus keeps pace with the time period of the increase in Cav1 expression, indicating that increased Cav1 protein levels due to lack of FMRP since adolescence may underlie the exclusively enhanced mGluR-LTD at age p28-p35 in KO mice.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

The expression of Cav1 is related to the level of FMRP. A Correlation between Cav1 and FMRP expression in the hippocampus at different weeks after birth. n = 8 mice per group. B, C Cav1 and FMRP protein levels were detected in hippocampus (B) and synaptosomes (C) from WT and Fmr1 KO mice at 2 and 5 weeks. n = 8 mice per group; ** p < 0.01 versus WT mice at 5 weeks, n.s. represented the comparison between WT and KO mice at 2 weeks was not significant, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

We then evaluated the effect of Group I mGluR activation on Cav1 translation. In the control group, Cav1 protein levels were higher in KO neurons than in WT neurons (Fig. 3A). However, DHPG induced a significant increase in the protein level of Cav1 in WT neurons but not in KO neurons (Fig. 3A). In addition, we also observed changes in mTOR and ERK phosphorylation levels by DHPG induction in WT and KO neurons, which were consistent with those of Cav1 (Fig. 3B, C). Takayasu et al. [15] reported that reduced mGluR-LTD in Cav1 − / − mice is protein synthesis-dependent and requires signaling via ERK and mTOR. Taken together with our finding, we considered Cav1 knockout would cause the elevation of basal phosphorylation of MEK and ERK1/2, but the regulatory mechanism was still unclear. These findings indicate that mGluR-dependent stimulation of Cav1 expression is regulated improperly in Fmr1 KO mice.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Effect of group I mGluR activation on Cav1, ERK, and mTOR expression. A DHPG (100 μM, 10 min) induced the expression of Cav1 in WT neurons (10 DIV), but led to no further increase in KO neurons. n = 6 dishes from three independent experiments; ** p < 0.01 versus WT control neurons, n.s. represented the comparison between KO control and DHPG was not significant, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. B, C Basal levels of phosphorylated ERK (B) and mTOR (C) were increased in Fmr1 KO neurons. In contrast to WT neurons, there was no further DHPG (100 μM, 5 min)-induced phosphorylation of ERK (B) and mTOR (C) in KO neurons. n = 6 dishes from three independent experiments; ** p < 0.01 versus WT control, n.s. represented the comparison between KO control and DHPG was not significant, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

Aberrant mGluR-LTD and GluA2 Endocytosis Is Alleviated by Knocking Down Excessive Cav1

We next investigated whether dysregulated Cav1 induced by FMRP responded to augmented mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice. Because Cav1 was overexpressed in the hippocampus of young KO mice, we microinjected GFP-labeled Cav1 shRNA lentiviruses into the CA1 area to knock down Cav1 and found that Cav1 shRNA-1 was the most effective (Fig. 4A, B). In the field potential recording, input/output curves showed that the fEPSP amplitude of each group increased as the stimulation intensity increased. However, there was no significant difference in the fEPSP slope between the Cav1 shRNA-1 group and the negative control group, indicating that shRNA had no effect on the baseline responses (Fig. S2). We then induced LTD at age p28-p35 in the KO hippocampus after shRNA-1 lentivirus infection for 1 week. In DHPG-induced mGluR-LTD, compared with the negative controls, Cav1 shRNA-1 significantly recovered the fEPSP slope of baseline (Cav1 shRNA-1, 74.06 ± 1.74% of 59 channels; negative control, 58.56 ± 1.01% of 58 channels; data from 10 slices of six Cav1 shRNA-1-infected mice and 9 slices of six negative control mice; Fig. 4C). However, no significant change was observed in LFS-induced NMDAR-LTD (Cav1 shRNA-1, 72.11 ± 1.64% of 55 channels; negative control, 73.64 ± 0.77% of 62 channels; data from 9 slices of six Cav1 shRNA-1-infected mice and 9 slices of six negative control mice; Fig. 4D). Furthermore, we wondered if inhibitory transmission may also be affected in these mice. Whole-cell patch recording in hippocampal neurons showed that inhibitory transmission in KO mice was normal and was not affected by Cav1 shRNA-1 (Fig. S3). These data support a function for Cav1 in the over-induction of mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Knockdown of Cav1 rescues the aberrant mGluR-LTD and GluA2 endocytosis. A Schematic diagram showed the location of the Med64 probe on a hippocampal slice and the position of GFP-labeled lentivirus infection. Scale bar = 1000 μm. B Knockdown of Cav1 in the hippocampus detected after shRNA infection for 4 days. n = 6 mice per group; ** p < 0.01 versus WT mice; ## p < 0.01 versus negative KO mice, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. C After 7 days of infection, Cav1 shRNA-1 decreased the normalized fEPSP slope of DHPG (100 μM, 10 min)-induced mGluR-LTD at age p28-p35 in KO mice. n = 58 channels recorded from 10 slices of six Cav1 shRNA-1-infected mice, n = 59 channels recorded from 9 slices of six negative KO mice; ** p < 0.01 versus negative KO mice, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. D No significant differences in normalized fEPSP slope was observed in LFS (900 pulses at 1 Hz, 15 min)-induced NMDAR-LTD. n = 62 channels recorded from 9 slices of six Cav1 shRNA-1-infected mice, n = 55 channels recorded from 9 slices of six negative KO mice, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Top, representative traces of 64 channels recorded at baseline (black) and 1 h after stimulation (colors). Calibration bars: 0.2 mV, 50 ms. Bottom left, normalized fEPSP slope (% baseline) of LTD from total active channels. Bottom right, summary graph of the final average fEPSP slope during the last 30 min. E Representative Western blots showed differential distribution of GluA1/2 on membranes and in the cytoplasm by DHPG-treated Cav1-interfered KO neurons. F, G Quantitative analysis of cumulative western blot experiments. Immunoreactivities of GluA2 (F) and GluA1 (G) on membranes were normalized to cadherin, and the cytoplasm were normalized to β-actin. n = 6 dishes from three independent experiments. H, I Quantitative analysis of cumulative western blot experiments. Immunoreactivities of total GluA1 (H) and GluA2 (I) were normalized to β-actin. n = 6 dishes from three independent experiments; ** p < 0.01 versus control; ## p < 0.01 versus negative + DHPG treatment; & p < 0.05 versus Cav1-shRNA + DHPG treatment, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

Given that the key event involved in LTD maintenance is internalization via endocytosis of synaptic AMPA glutamate receptors (AMPARs) [29–31], we evaluated the role of Cav1 in transporting the key subunits of AMPARs, GluA1 and GluA2. In cultured KO neurons, DHPG strongly promoted GluA2, but not GluA1, translocation from membranes to the cytoplasm (Fig. 4E). However, GluA2 expression on membranes induced by DHPG was increased after Cav1 knockdown compared to the negative control conditions, although the distribution of GluA1 on membranes and cytoplasm was not altered (Fig. 4E–G). However, the change in GluA2 delivery was blocked by dynasore, an inhibitor of dynamin, which is a GTPase affecting membrane scission (Fig. 4E, F). In addition, there were no significant changes in GluA1 and GluA2 total protein levels (Fig. 4E, H, I). Conversely, we overexpressed Cav1 in cultured WT neurons (Fig. 5A, B) and found that Cav1 overexpression further decreased the membrane GluA2 level after DHPG incubation and that this effect was also blocked by dynasore (Fig. 5C, D). The GluA1 distribution in cell subregions was similarly unchanged (Fig. 5C, E). Also, the total protein levels of GluA1 and GluA2 showed no remarkable changes (Fig. 5C, F, G). Besides, Sucrose gradient fractions revealing membrane GluA2 localized in caveolae, identified by the presence of Cav1. DHPG treatment enhanced Cav1 expression and redistributed GluA2 from membrane rafts to the cytoplasm (Fig. S4). These results indicate that abnormal Cav1 assembles excessive GluA2 endocytosis in a dynamin-dependent manner, resulting in exaggerated mGluR-LTD in the KO hippocampus.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Overexpression of Cav1 regulates the GluA2 endocytosis induced by DHPG. A Bright-field image showing hippocampal neurons cultured in vitro for 10 days. GFP-positive neurons (green) indicate the successful infection of the lentivirus. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Cav1 expression was detected by Western blot after 4 days of infection. n = 6 dishes from three independent experiments; ** p < 0.01 versus negative control, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. C Representative western blots showed differential distribution of GluA1/2 on membranes and in the cytoplasm by DHPG-treated Cav1-OE WT neurons. D, E Quantitative analysis of cumulative western blot experiments. Immunoreactivities of GluA2 (D) and GluA1 (E) on membranes were normalized to cadherin, and the immunoreactivities in the cytoplasm were normalized to β-actin. n = 6 dishes from three independent experiments. F, G Quantitative analysis of cumulative western blot experiments. Immunoreactivities of total GluA1 (F) and GluA2 (G) were normalized to β-actin. n = 6 dishes from three independent experiments; ** p < 0.01 versus control; # p < 0.05 versus negative + DHPG treatment; && p < 0.01 versus Cav1-OE + DHPG treatment, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

Excessive Cholesterol Accumulated in Fmr1 KO Mice

Cholesterol is highly concentrated in caveolae domains. Recent findings indicate that Cav1 directly binds to cholesterol, and this protein-lipid interaction is thought to be essential for caveolae formation [32, 33]. We determined cholesterol contents by quantitative measurements and filipin III staining. Total cholesterol levels in the serum or hippocampus were the same in both 2-week- and 5-week-old WT and KO mice, but free cholesterol levels were significantly lower in 5-week-old KO mice than in WT mice (Fig. 6A, B). Namely, cholesterol ester was increased in 5-week-old KO mice, indicating the accumulation of excessive cholesterol in Fmr1 KO mice. Consistently, filipin III staining also showed increased cholesterol concentrations in the CA1 region of 5-week-old KO mice (Fig. 6C). These data support the notion that excessive cholesterol accumulation in the hippocampus promotes caveolae formation, facilitating GluA2 internalization under certain circumstances.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Excessive cholesterol is accumulated in the adolescent Fmr1 KO hippocampus. A, B Levels of total cholesterol and free cholesterol were detected in serum (A) and hippocampus tissue (B) from WT and KO mice. Free cholesterol was reduced over 5 weeks in KO mice. n = 6 mice per group; * p < 0.05 versus WT. Cholesterol content was normalized with protein and expressed as ng/mg of tissue. n = 6 mice per group; * p < 0.05 versus WT, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. C Filipin III staining showed the cholesterol (green) in the hippocampal CA1 region under 4 × and 20 × magnification, respectively. Green represents positive neurons. The statistical results showed that the cholesterol intensity in CA1 region increased in 5-week-old KO mice. Left: scale bar = 1000 μm; Right: scale bar = 100 μm. n = 6 mice per group; * p < 0.05 versus WT, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

Mβ-CD Restores Abnormal GluA2 Trafficking and Behaviors in Fmr1 KO Mice

To assess the role of Cav1-mediated cholesterol and membrane/lipid rafts in DHPG-triggered AMPA receptor internalization, we used the cholesterol-binding agent methyl-β-cyclodextrin (Mβ-CD), which depletes cell surface cholesterol [34]. The results revealed that Mβ-CD (5 mM, 60 min) prevented DHPG-induced excessive GluA2 endocytosis in the KO hippocampus, with higher membrane and lower cytoplasm levels than DHPG alone (Fig. 7A–C). In addition, cholesterol (15 μg/ml, 60 min) reversed the effects of Mβ-CD on GluA2 endocytosis (Fig. 7A–C). These data indicate that DHPG-induced GluA2 trafficking depends on the structural integrity of caveolae in neurons.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Mβ-CD reverses DHPG-induced GluA2 trafficking and abnormal behaviors of adolescent Fmr1 KO mice. A Immunoblots detected GluA2 levels on membranes and in the cytoplasm of hippocampal slices, with pan-cadherin and β-actin as internal control, respectively. B Mβ-CD enhanced the surface level in the KO hippocampus upon DHPG treatment, but the effect was reversed by cholesterol. n = 6 mice per group; ** p < 0.01 versus KO control; ## p < 0.01 versus KO DHPG alone; & p < 0.05 versus KO DHPG and Mβ-CD, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. C The cytoplasmic GluA2 level was slightly decreased under Mβ-CD, although there was no significant difference. n = 6 mice per group; ** p < 0.01 versus KO control, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. D Sample traces of locomotor activity in the open field test. E, F Fmr1 KO mice subcutaneously injected with low (125 mg/kg), medium (250 mg/kg), and high (500 mg/kg) doses of Mβ-CD for 2 weeks showed a reduction in the total distance travelled (E) and time spent in center area (F). n = 10 mice per group; ** p < 0.01 versus WT mice; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus KO mice. G On training day 1, mice were exposed to three tone-foot shock pairs. KO mice with Mβ-CD exhibited increased freezing during the last phase. H Low and medium doses of Mβ-CD improved contextual fear learning in KO mice. I Mβ-CD had no effect on cued fear learning. n = 10 mice per group; * p < 0.05 versus WT mice; ## p < 0.01 versus KO mice alone. J In the Morris water maze test, KO mice injected with Mβ-CD showed reduced escape latency, with an increase in learning days. K Low and medium doses of Mβ-CD enhanced the number of crossings in KO mice. L No significant difference between groups was observed in swimming speed. n = 10 mice per group; ** p < 0.01 versus WT mice; ## p < 0.01 versus KO mice alone, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (E–L)

Based on the preliminary results, different doses of Mβ-CD (125, 250, 500 mg/kg) were finally used to test whether Mβ-CD affects abnormal behaviors in Fmr1 KO mice. Locomotor activity was analyzed in an open-field test to characterize hyperactivity, a common phenotype in FXS [35]. We found that all three doses of Mβ-CD significantly reduced the total distance traveled and the time spent in the central area in KO mice (Fig. 7D–F). In the fear conditioning paradigm described previously [25], we subjected mice to three pairs of CS-US during the learning phase on day 1 (Fig. 7G). During the acquisition period, KO mice injected with Mβ-CD exhibited higher responses than control mice (Fig. 7G). On day 2, both low and medium doses of Mβ-CD significantly increased freezing times during the hippocampus-dependent contextual recall test (Fig. 7H), whereas no significant differences between groups were observed during the amygdala-dependent cued fear condition on day 3 (Fig. 7I). Because spatial working memory is hippocampus-dependent [36], we next determined the effect of Mβ-CD on impaired spatial memory in KO mice tested on the Morris water maze. After Mβ-CD injection, KO mice were able to quickly find the platform on the following day, while vehicle-treated KO mice took until the fourth day to find it (Fig. 7J). Both low and medium doses of Mβ-CD dramatically increased the number of platform crossings in KO mice in the Morris water maze test (Fig. 7K), and these effects had nothing to do with swimming speed (Fig. 7L). Taken together, these findings show that Mβ-CD can alleviate the behavioral defects of Fmr1 KO mice, implying its potential clinical usage to treat FXS.

Discussion

Although clathrin-dependent internalization of neurotransmitter receptors has been extensively documented, little is known about the contribution of caveolins to endocytosis in neurons. In this study, we showed that Cav1 is involved in mGluR-triggered AMPA receptor endocytosis within the LTD and obtained evidence for the mGluR theory of FXS in view of structural signal formation.

mGluR- and NMDAR-LTD in the Different Stages of FXS

The mGluR theory hypothesizes that the psychiatric and neurological aspects of FXS are a consequence of exaggerated Group I mGluR activation [5]. Here, since FXS is a developmental retardation disease, we focused on the changes in mGluR-LTD in the Fmr1 KO hippocampus at different developmental stages. Using the Group I mGluR agonist DHPG, we observed augmented hippocampal mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice aged p28-p35 but not in those aged p8-p15. Consistently, Toft et al. [17] reported that with NMDAR blockers, only p30-p60 Fmr1 KO mice exhibited more mGluR-LTD than WT mice, suggesting that prolonged mGluR signaling in FXS results from specific alterations during development. Although Cooke et al. [37] proposed that the enhancement of mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice was due to a lack of amino acids in the incubation medium, we suggest that one of the important reasons is the differential protein expression that mediates AMPA receptor endocytosis. Caveolin-coated pits in the postsynaptic membranes of glutamatergic nerves are primarily found in the late stages of growth and development [38]. Additionally, Cav1 protein levels gradually increase after birth due to the inhibitory effect of FMRP on Cav1 mRNA translation [11]. We therefore considered that Cav1 was not expressed high enough to initiate mGluR-triggered endocytosis during early development. Moreover, there was no difference in Cav1 levels between WT and KO mice at this stage, and mGluR-LTD was normal in infant Fmr1 KO mice. However, Cav1 expression increased in adolescence, especially in Fmr1 KO mice, which may have been involved in the excessive endocytosis of AMPARs and led to mGluR-LTD enhancement.

Because at early stages, mGluR-LTD is presynaptic and independent of protein synthesis [39], we propose another reason related to protein synthesis. At later stages, mGluR-LTD is a dendritic protein synthesis-dependent form of synaptic plasticity [40, 41]. Although increased protein synthesis is observed in multiple brain regions of FXS mouse models and in cells derived from FXS patients [42, 43], some studies have indicated that protein synthesis is not required for mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice [27, 44]. Consistently, we observed that the ERK and mTOR signaling pathways involved in protein synthesis were not further activated by DHPG in the KO hippocampus. Thus, the enhancement of mGluR-LTD in Fmr1 KO mice did not require protein synthesis, perhaps because the “LTD protein” levels were elevated due to excessive translation during development. Our study suggests Cav1 as one kind of LTD protein whose levels are increased in the adolescent Fmr1 KO hippocampus and whose expression is no longer induced by DHPG.

Role of Caveolins in Synaptic Plasticity

Caveolae are 50 ~ 100-nm flask-shaped invaginations of the plasma membrane and are identified by the presence of the protein caveolin, which is essential for their biogenesis [45]. Caveolae harbor numerous signaling proteins, largely through their interaction with caveolin. They have been hypothesized to act as central hubs for intracellular signaling, facilitating signal transduction or, in some cases, sequestering and limiting activation of signaling cascades [45, 46]. This raises the possibility that caveolae might be involved in synapse formation and plasticity. Head et al. [47] demonstrated that neuron-targeted Cav1 improved NMDA- and BDNF-mediated signaling and enhanced dendritic growth. The resultant structural alterations in hippocampal neurons are associated with improvements in hippocampal-dependent learning and memory [25]. Another study has shown that Cav1 can also directly interact with and regulate the function of Group I mGluRs in the hippocampus and facilitate mGluR1 and mGluR5 expression [14]. Cav1 may thus positively regulate the transport of mGluR1/5 to the membrane surface and then amplify mGluR signaling, which may be responsible for the exaggerated mGluR in FXS. Accordingly, we previously reported that overexpressed Cav1 in Fmr1 KO mice interfered with synaptic facilitation and LTP formation in the ACC [11].

Here, we demonstrate that Cav1 is involved in AMPAR endocytosis in the Fmr1 KO hippocampus. Cav1 interference reversed mGluR-LTD and decreased the mGluR-induced reduction in surface AMPARs. Conversely, Cav1 overexpression promoted AMPAR endocytosis from lipid rafts. Additionally, other studies have provided evidence for the localization of GluA2 to caveolae-like structures in hippocampal neurons [48, 49], which structurally supports the participation of Cav1 in GluA2 trafficking. However, we cannot exclude the role of clathrin in normal mGluR-LTD because DHPG is still able to induce LTD in the hippocampal slices of Cav1 KO mice, although at a smaller magnitude than in WT controls [15]. As DHPG promptly induced Cav1 expression, we suggest that Cav1-mediated GluA2 endocytosis is primarily dependent on mGluR1/5 activity and therefore attribute the enhanced mGluR-LTD in the Fmr1 KO hippocampus to excessive Cav1 levels.

Potential of Cyclodextrin in the Treatment of FXS

Cav1 is an integral membrane protein required for the formation of cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomain caveolae. Recent findings indicate that transport of newly synthesized cholesterol from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane is mediated by caveolin proteins [50, 51]. In addition, Cav1 directly binds cholesterol, and cholesterol is required for the insertion of recombinant Cav1 into lipid membranes [32, 52]. Cav1 expression is increased in several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), suggesting Cav1 as a potential therapeutic target [53]. Our studies found that Cav1 expression in Fmr1 KO mice is increased due to the loss of FMRP translation repression, implying the relevance of Cav1 for FXS pathogenesis [11]. Previous reports have shown that compounds from herbs, such as curcumin, daidzein, and salidroside, decrease Cav1 expression and/or phosphorylation [54, 55]. However, none has a specific effect on caveolae. Some studies have used cyclodextrin (CD), a cholesterol scavenger, to directly prevent caveolae formation [56]. 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) treatment has been evaluated in the AD mouse model and found to reduce the neurotoxic effects of Aβ [57]. Additionally, CD-based therapies have demonstrated promising advances with HP-β-CD in clinical trials for Niemann-Pick and Tangier disease [58]. Here, we found elevated cholesterol ester contents in the Fmr1 KO hippocampus accompanied by alterations in Cav1 expression. These findings provide new insights into the altered lipid profiles in FXS. Although hypocholesterolemia was observed in a French-Canadian FXS population [59], this may have been due to the inconsistency between cholesterol metabolism in the blood and brain or to differences in age. Therefore, further investigations are warranted to better understand the association between cholesterol metabolism and FXS. A recent clinical study supported the clinical significance of lipid raft cholesterol alterations in FXS [60]. It is clear that lovastatin, a drug widely prescribed to treat high cholesterol, can correct excess hippocampal ERK-mediated protein synthesis and prevent mGluR-induced epileptogenesis in Fmr1 KO mice [61]. We therefore used Mβ-CD to restore GluA2-containing AMPA receptor endocytosis. Moreover, Mβ-CD administered subcutaneously twice a week for 2 weeks to Fmr1 KO mice attenuated hyperactivity and rescued hippocampus-dependent contextual fear memory and spatial memory but did not affect amygdala-dependent cued fear memory. Although mGluR5 antagonists can also significantly improve synaptic development, plasticity, and behavioral abnormalities in Fmr1 KO mice [62], clinical trials have thus far failed due to widespread adverse reactions. CD has been used as a drug delivery carrier because of its safety, so it is expected to be applied to regulate the function of mGluR in patients with FXS.

In conclusion, our study indicates that exaggerated mGluR-LTD in the Fmr1 KO hippocampus is development-dependent and related to overexpressed Cav1 followed by AMPA receptor endocytosis under mGluR1/5 activation. Moreover, massive cholesterol accumulation contributes to redundant caveolae formation, which provides the platform for mGluR-triggered Cav1 coupling to GluA2. In addition, cholesterol depletion by Mβ-CD recovers AMPA receptor trafficking and ameliorates the principal behavioral disorders observed in Fmr1 KO mice. Our findings elucidate the important role of Cav1 in the pathology of FXS from the perspective of mGluR theory and suggest a novel and safe strategy for the treatment of FXS.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1035 KB) (1MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Ya-Ya Du and Wen-Na Liu for technical support.

Author Contribution

Qi Yang and Li Luo contributed to the conception and design of the study. Li Luo, Le Yang, Kun Zhang, Shi-Meng Zhou, Liu-Kun Yang, Shui-Bing Liu, Yu-Mei Wu, Yan Wang, and Bin Feng contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data. Qi Yang and Li Luo drafted the manuscript and figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31500820 and 81870893) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tangdu Hospital (2021ZTXM-033).

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

All animal experiments were approved by the Fourth Military Medical University.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Li Luo, Le Yang, and Kun Zhang contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Protic DD, Aishworiya R, Salcedo-Arellano MJ, Tang SJ, Milisavljevic J, Mitrovic F, et al. Fragile X syndrome: from molecular aspect to clinical treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):1935. doi: 10.3390/ijms23041935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sutcliffe JS, Nelson DL, Zhang F, Pieretti M, Caskey CT, Saxe D, et al. DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1(6):397–400. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.6.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dockendorff TC, Labrador M. The fragile X protein and genome function. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(1):711–721. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1122-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dahlhaus R. Of Men and mice: modeling the fragile X syndrome. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:41. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bear MF, Huber KM, Warren ST. The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27(7):370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huber KM, Gallagher SM, Warren ST, Bear MF. Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(11):7746–7750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122205699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garber K, Smith KT, Reines D, Warren ST. Transcription, translation and fragile X syndrome. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16(3):270–275. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zalfa F, Achsel T, Bagni C. mRNPs, polysomes or granules: FMRP in neuronal protein synthesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16(3):265–269. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bagni C, Greenough WT. From mRNP trafficking to spine dysmorphogenesis: the roots of fragile X syndrome. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(5):376–387. doi: 10.1038/nrn1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grossman AW, Aldridge GM, Weiler IJ, Greenough WT. Local protein synthesis and spine morphogenesis: fragile X syndrome and beyond. J Neurosci. 2006;26(27):7151–7155. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1790-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang Q, Yang L, Zhang K, Guo YY, Liu SB, Wu YM, et al. Increased coupling of caveolin-1 and estrogen receptor alpha contributes to the fragile X syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(4):618–636. doi: 10.1002/ana.24358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pelkmans L, Burli T, Zerial M, Helenius A. Caveolin-stabilized membrane domains as multifunctional transport and sorting devices in endocytic membrane traffic. Cell. 2004;118(6):767–780. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Motanis H, Buonomano D. Decreased reproducibility and abnormal experience-dependent plasticity of network dynamics in Fragile X circuits. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71333-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Francesconi A, Kumari R, Zukin RS. Regulation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptor trafficking and signaling by the caveolar/lipid raft pathway. J Neurosci. 2009;29(11):3590–3602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5824-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Takayasu Y, Takeuchi K, Kumari R, Bennett MV, Zukin RS, Francesconi A. Caveolin-1 knockout mice exhibit impaired induction of mGluR-dependent long-term depression at CA3-CA1 synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(50):21778–21783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015553107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Valenza M, Cattaneo E. Cholesterol dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: is Huntington's disease in the list? Prog Neurobiol. 2006;80(4):165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Toft AK, Lundbye CJ, Banke TG. Dysregulated NMDA-receptor signaling inhibits long-term depression in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J Neurosci. 2016;36(38):9817–9827. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3038-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim HH, Park JM, Lee SH, Ho WK. Association of mGluR-dependent LTD of excitatory synapses with endocannabinoid-dependent LTD of inhibitory synapses leads to EPSP to spike potentiation in CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. 2019;39(2):224–237. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2935-17.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song Q, Zheng HW, Li XH, Huganir RL, Kuner T, Zhuo M, et al. Selective phosphorylation of AMPA receptor contributes to the network of long-term potentiation in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Neurosci. 2017;37(35):8534–8548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0925-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Raynaud F, Janossy A, Dahl J, Bertaso F, Perroy J, Varrault A, et al. Shank3-Rich2 interaction regulates AMPA receptor recycling and synaptic long-term potentiation. J Neurosci. 2013;33(23):9699–9715. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2725-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang B, Peng F, Wu D, Ingram AJ, Gao B, Krepinsky JC. Caveolin-1 phosphorylation is required for stretch-induced EGFR and Akt activation in mesangial cells. Cell Signal. 2007;19(8):1690–1700. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou Y, Takahashi E, Li W, Halt A, Wiltgen B, Ehninger D, et al. Interactions between the NR2B receptor and CaMKII modulate synaptic plasticity and spatial learning. J Neurosci. 2007;27(50):13843–13853. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4486-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang H, Wu LJ, Kim SS, Lee FJ, Gong B, Toyoda H, et al. FMRP acts as a key messenger for dopamine modulation in the forebrain. Neuron. 2008;59(4):634–647. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Widenmaier SB, Snyder NA, Nguyen TB, Arduini A, Lee GY, Arruda AP, et al. NRF1 is an ER membrane sensor that is central to cholesterol homeostasis. Cell. 2017;171(5):1094–1109 e1015. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mandyam CD, Schilling JM, Cui W, Egawa J, Niesman IR, Kellerhals SE, et al. Neuron-targeted caveolin-1 improves molecular signaling, plasticity, and behavior dependent on the hippocampus in adult and aged mice. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81(2):101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang K, Li YJ, Feng D, Zhang P, Wang YT, Li X, et al. Imbalance between TNFalpha and progranulin contributes to memory impairment and anxiety in sleep-deprived mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43594. doi: 10.1038/srep43594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hou L, Antion MD, Hu D, Spencer CM, Paylor R, Klann E. Dynamic translational and proteasomal regulation of fragile X mental retardation protein controls mGluR-dependent long-term depression. Neuron. 2006;51(4):441–454. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bonaccorso CM, Spatuzza M, Di Marco B, Gloria A, Barrancotto G, Cupo A, et al. Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) interacting proteins exhibit different expression patterns during development. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2015;42:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Isaac JT, Ashby MC, McBain CJ. The role of the GluR2 subunit in AMPA receptor function and synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2007;54(6):859–871. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Malinow R, Malenka RC. AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002;25:103–126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25:112701.142758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Malenka RC, Bear MF. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron. 2004;44(1):5–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Murata M, Peränen J, Schreiner R, Wieland F, Kurzchalia TV, Simons K. VIP21/caveolin is a cholesterol-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(22):10339–10343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sargiacomo M, Scherer PE, Tang Z, Kübler E, Song KS, Sanders MC, et al. Oligomeric structure of caveolin: implications for caveolae membrane organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(20):9407–9411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ushio-Fukai M, Hilenski L, Santanam N, Becker PL, Ma Y, Griendling KK, et al. Cholesterol depletion inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation by angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle cells: role of cholesterol-rich microdomains and focal adhesions in angiotensin II signaling. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(51):48269–48275. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105901200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moon J, Beaudin AE, Verosky S, Driscoll LL, Weiskopf M, Levitsky DA, et al. Attentional dysfunction, impulsivity, and resistance to change in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Behav Neurosci. 2006;120(6):1367–1379. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.6.1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bannerman DM, Sprengel R, Sanderson DJ, McHugh SB, Rawlins JN, Monyer H, et al. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity, spatial memory and anxiety. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(3):181–192. doi: 10.1038/nrn3677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cooke SK, Russin J, Moulton K, Nadel J, Loutaev I, Gu Q, et al. Effects of the presence and absence of amino acids on translation, signaling, and long-term depression in hippocampal slices from Fmr1 knockout mice. J Neurochem. 2019;151(6):764–776. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Petralia RS, Wang YX, Wenthold RJ. Internalization at glutamatergic synapses during development. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;18(12):3207–3217. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2003.03074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nosyreva ED, Huber KM. Developmental switch in synaptic mechanisms of hippocampal metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent long-term depression. J Neurosci. 2005;25(11):2992–3001. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3652-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hou L, Klann E. Activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway is required for metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent long-term depression. J Neurosci. 2004;24(28):6352–6361. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0995-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huber KM, Roder JC, Bear MF. Chemical induction of mGluR5- and protein synthesis–dependent long-term depression in hippocampal area CA1. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86(1):321–325. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.1.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aryal S, Klann E. Turning up translation in fragile X syndrome. Science. 2018;361(6403):648–649. doi: 10.1126/science.aau6450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Darnell JC, Klann E. The translation of translational control by FMRP: therapeutic targets for FXS. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(11):1530–1536. doi: 10.1038/nn.3379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nosyreva ED, Huber KM. Metabotropic receptor-dependent long-term depression persists in the absence of protein synthesis in the mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95(5):3291–3295. doi: 10.1152/jn.01316.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cohen AW, Hnasko R, Schubert W, Lisanti MP. Role of caveolae and caveolins in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004;84(4):1341–1379. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00046.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Parton RG, Simons K. The multiple faces of caveolae. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(3):185–194. doi: 10.1038/nrm2122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Head BP, Hu Y, Finley JC, Saldana MD, Bonds JA, Miyanohara A, et al. Neuron-targeted caveolin-1 protein enhances signaling and promotes arborization of primary neurons. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(38):33310–33321. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.255976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Suzuki T, Ito J, Takagi H, Saitoh F, Nawa H, Shimizu H. Biochemical evidence for localization of AMPA-type glutamate receptor subunits in the dendritic raft. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001;89(1–2):20–28. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(01)00051-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gaudreault SB, Chabot C, Gratton JP, Poirier J. The caveolin scaffolding domain modifies 2-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate receptor binding properties by inhibiting phospholipase A2 activity. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(1):356–362. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304777200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Smart EJ, Ying Y, Donzell WC, Anderson RG. A role for caveolin in transport of cholesterol from endoplasmic reticulum to plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(46):29427–29435. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.46.29427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fielding CJ, Bist A, Fielding PE. Caveolin mRNA levels are up-regulated by free cholesterol and down-regulated by oxysterols in fibroblast monolayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(8):3753–3758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li S, Song KS, Lisanti MP. Expression and characterization of recombinant caveolin. Purification by polyhistidine tagging and cholesterol-dependent incorporation into defined lipid membranes. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(1):568–573. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.1.568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang S, Leem JS, Podvin S, Hook V, Kleschevnikov N, Savchenko P, et al. Synapsin-caveolin-1 gene therapy preserves neuronal and synaptic morphology and prevents neurodegeneration in a mouse model of AD. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021;21:434–450. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Arya A, Yadav HN, Sharma PL. Involvement of vascular endothelial nitric oxide synthase in development of experimental diabetic nephropathy in rats. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;354(1–2):57–66. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-0805-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wu D, Yang X, Zheng T, Xing S, Wang J, Chi J, et al. A novel mechanism of action for salidroside to alleviate diabetic albuminuria: effects on albumin transcytosis across glomerular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016;310(3):E225–237. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00391.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Buschiazzo J, Bonini IC, Alonso TS. Inhibition of Bufo arenarum oocyte maturation induced by cholesterol depletion by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Role of low-density caveolae-like membranes. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2008;1778(6):1398–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yao J, Ho D, Calingasan NY, Pipalia NH, Lin MT, Beal MF. Neuroprotection by cyclodextrin in cell and mouse models of Alzheimer disease. J Exp Med. 2012;209(13):2501–2513. doi: 10.1084/jem.20121239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tufro A. Cholesterol accumulation in podocytes: a potential novel targetable pathway in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2013;62(11):3661–3662. doi: 10.2337/db13-1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Caku A, Seidah NG, Lortie A, Gagné N, Perron P, Dubé J, et al. New insights of altered lipid profile in Fragile X Syndrome. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Toupin A, Benachenhou S, Abolghasemi A, Laroui A, Galarneau L, Fülöp T, et al. Association of lipid rafts cholesterol with clinical profile in fragile X syndrome. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2936. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07064-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Osterweil EK, Chuang SC, Chubykin AA, Sidorov M, Bianchi R, Wong RK, et al. Lovastatin corrects excess protein synthesis and prevents epileptogenesis in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Neuron. 2013;77(2):243–250. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yan QJ, Rammal M, Tranfaglia M, Bauchwitz RP. Suppression of two major Fragile X Syndrome mouse model phenotypes by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP. Neuropharmacology. 2005;49(7):1053–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sun LN, Yang ZY, Lv SS, Liu XC, Guan GJ, Liu G. Curcumin prevents diabetic nephropathy against inflammatory response via reversing caveolin-1 Tyr14 phosphorylation influenced TLR4 activation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2014;23(1):236–246. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1035 KB) (1MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Articles from Molecular Neurobiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES